Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the predominant primary cancer arising from the liver and is one of the major causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The cellular origin of HCC has been a topic of great interest due to conflicting findings regarding whether it originates in hepatocytes, biliary cells, or facultative stem cells. These cell types all undergo changes during liver injury, and there is controversy about their contribution to regenerative responses in the liver. Most HCCs emerge in the setting of chronic liver injury from viral hepatitis, fatty liver disease, alcohol, and environmental exposures. The injuries are marked by liver parenchymal changes such as hepatocyte regenerative nodules, biliary duct cellular changes, expansion of myofibroblasts that cause fibrosis and cirrhosis, and inflammatory cell infiltration, all of which may contribute to carcinogenesis. Addressing the cellular origin of HCC is the key to identifying the earliest events that trigger it. Herein, we review data on the cells of origin in regenerating liver and HCC and the implications of these findings for prevention and treatment. We also review the origins of childhood liver cancer and other rare cancers of the liver.

UNASSIGNED: As the composition of the bile acid (BA) pool has a major impact on liver pathophysiology, we studied its regulation by the BA receptor Takeda G protein coupled receptor (TGR5), which promotes hepatoprotection against BA overload.
UNASSIGNED: Wild-type, total and hepatocyte-specific TGR5-knockout, and TGR5-overexpressing mice were used in: partial (66%) and 89% extended hepatectomies (EHs) upon normal, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)- or cholestyramine (CT)-enriched diet, bile duct ligation (BDL), cholic acid (CA)-enriched diet, and TGR5 agonist (RO) treatments. We thereby studied the impact of TGR5 on: BA composition, liver injury, regeneration and survival. We also performed analyses on the gut microbiota (GM) and gallbladder (GB). Liver BA composition was analysed in patients undergoing major hepatectomy.
UNASSIGNED: The TGR5-KO hyperhydrophobic BA composition was not directly related to altered BA synthesis, nor to TGR5-KO GM dysbiosis, as supported by hepatocyte-specific KO mice and co-housing experiments, respectively. The TGR5-dependent control of GB dilatation was crucial for BA composition, as determined by experiments including RO treatment and/or cholecystectomy. The poor TGR5-KO post-EH survival rate, related to exacerbated peribiliary necrosis and BA overload, was improved by shifting BAs toward a less toxic composition (CT treatment). After either BDL or a CA-enriched diet with or without cholecystectomy, we found that GB dilatation had strong TGR5-dependent hepatoprotective properties. In patients, a more hydrophobic liver BA composition was correlated with an unfavourable outcome after hepatectomy.
UNASSIGNED: BA composition is crucial for hepatoprotection in mice and humans. We indicate TGR5 as a key regulator of BA profile and thereby as a potential hepatoprotective target under BA overload conditions.
UNASSIGNED: Through multiple in vivo experimental approaches in mice, together with a patient study, this work brings some new light on the relationships between biliary homeostasis, gallbladder function, and liver protection. We showed that hepatic bile acid composition is crucial for optimal liver repair, not only in mice, but also in human patients undergoing major hepatectomy.

Extracellular nucleotides, including ATP, are essential regulators of liver function and serve as danger signals that trigger inflammation upon injury. Ectonucleotidases, which are expressed by liver-resident cells and recruited immune cells sequentially hydrolyse nucleotides to adenosine. The nucleotide/nucleoside balance orchestrates liver homeostasis, tissue repair, and functional restoration by regulating the crosstalk between liver-resident cells and recruited immune cells. In this review, we discuss our current knowledge on the role of purinergic signals in liver homeostasis, restriction of inflammation, stimulation of liver regeneration, modulation of fibrogenesis, and regulation of carcinogenesis. Moreover, we discuss potential targeted therapeutic strategies for liver diseases based on purinergic signals involving blockade of nucleotide receptors, enhancement of ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase activity, and activation of adenosine receptors.

An understanding of the molecular basis of liver regeneration will open new horizons for the development of novel therapies for chronic liver failure. Such therapies would solve the drawbacks associated with liver transplant, including the shortage of donor organs, long waitlist time, high medical costs, and lifelong use of immunosuppressive agents. Regeneration after partial hepatectomy has been studied in animal models, particularly fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase-deficient (FAH -/-) mice and pigs. The process of regeneration is distinctive, complex, and well coordinated, and it depends on the interplay among several signaling pathways (eg, nuclear factor κβ, Notch, Hippo), cytokines (eg, tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 6), and growth factors (eg, hepatocyte growth factor, epidermal growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor), and other components. Furthermore, endocrinal hormones (eg, norepinephrine, growth hormone, insulin, thyroid hormones) also can influence the aforementioned pathways and factors. We believe that these endocrinal hormones are important hepatic mitogens that strongly induce and accelerate hepatocyte proliferation (regeneration) by directly and indirectly triggering the activity of the involved signaling pathways, cytokines, growth factors, and transcription factors. The subsequent induction of cyclins and associated cyclin-dependent kinase complexes allow hepatocytes to enter the cell cycle. In this review article, we comprehensively summarize the current knowledge regarding the roles and mechanisms of these hormones in liver regeneration. Articles used for this review were identified by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception through June 1, 2019.

Uncontrolled liver proliferation is a key characteristic of liver cancer; however, the mechanisms by which this occurs are not well understood. Elucidation of these mechanisms is necessary for the development of better therapy. The oncogene Gankyrin (Gank) is overexpressed in both hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatoblastoma. The aim of this work was to determine the role of Gank in liver proliferation and elucidate the mechanism by which Gank promotes liver proliferation.
We generated Gank liver-specific knock-out (GLKO) mice and examined liver biology and proliferation after surgical resection and liver injury.
Global profiling of gene expression in GLKO mice showed significant changes in pathways involved in liver cancer and proliferation. Investigations of liver proliferation after partial hepatectomy and CCl4 treatment showed that GLKO mice have dramatically inhibited proliferation of hepatocytes at early stages after surgery and injury. In control LoxP mice, liver proliferation was characterized by Gank-mediated reduction of tumor-suppressor proteins (TSPs). The failure of GLKO hepatocytes to proliferate is associated with a lack of down-regulation of these proteins. Surprisingly, we found that hepatic progenitor cells of GLKO mice start proliferation at later stages and restore the original size of the liver at 14 days after partial hepatectomy. To examine the proliferative activities of Gank in cancer cells, we used a small molecule, cjoc42, to inhibit interactions of Gank with the 26S proteasome. These studies showed that Gank triggers degradation of TSPs and that cjoc42-mediated inhibition of Gank increases levels of TSPs and inhibits proliferation of cancer cells.
These studies show that Gank promotes hepatocyte proliferation by elimination of TSPs. This work provides background for the development of Gank-mediated therapy for the treatment of liver cancer. RNA sequencing data can be accessed in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus: GSE104395.

The liver is unique in regenerative potential, which could recover the lost mass and function after injury from ischemia and resection. The underlying molecular mechanisms of liver regeneration have been extensively studied in the past using the partial hepatectomy (PH) model in rodents, where 2/3 PH is carried out by removing two lobes. The whole process of liver regeneration is complicated, orchestrated event involving a network of connected interactions, which still remain fully elusive. Bile acids (BAs) are ligands of farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a nuclear receptor of ligand-activated transcription factor. FXR has been shown to be highly involved in liver regeneration. BAs and FXR not only interact with each other but also regulate various downstream targets independently during liver regeneration. Moreover, recent findings suggest that tissue-specific FXR also contributes to liver regeneration significantly. These novel findings suggest that FXR has much broader role than regulating BA, cholesterol, lipid and glucose metabolism. Therefore, these researches highlight FXR as an important pharmaceutical target for potential use of FXR ligands to regulate liver regeneration in clinic. This review focuses on the roles of BAs and FXR in liver regeneration and the current underlying molecular mechanisms which contribute to liver regeneration.

Liver regeneration has been well studied with hope of discovering strategies to improve liver disease outcomes. Nevertheless, the signals that initiate such regeneration remain incompletely defined, and translation of mechanism-based pro-regenerative interventions into new treatments for hepatic diseases has not yet been achieved. We previously reported the isoform-specific regulation and essential function of zinc-dependent histone deacetylases (Zn-HDACs) during mouse liver regeneration. Those data suggest that epigenetically regulated anti-proliferative genes are deacetylated and transcriptionally suppressed by Zn-HDAC activity or that pro-regenerative factors are acetylated and induced by such activity in response to partial hepatectomy (PH). To investigate these possibilities, we conducted genome-wide interrogation of the liver histone acetylome during early PH-induced liver regeneration in mice using acetyL-histone chromatin immunoprecipitation and next generation DNA sequencing. We also compared the findings of that study to those seen during the impaired regenerative response that occurs with Zn-HDAC inhibition. The results reveal an epigenetic signature of early liver regeneration that includes both hyperacetylation of pro-regenerative factors and deacetylation of anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic genes. Our data also show that administration of an anti-regenerative regimen of the Zn-HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) not only disrupts gene-specific pro-regenerative changes in liver histone deacetylation but also reverses PH-induced effects on histone hyperacetylation. Taken together, these studies offer new insight into and suggest novel hypotheses about the epigenetic mechanisms that regulate liver regeneration.