BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models (CPM), such as the SCOAP-CERTAIN tool, can be utilized to enhance decision-making for lumbar spinal fusion surgery by providing quantitative estimates of outcomes, aiding surgeons in assessing potential benefits and risks for each individual patient. External validation is crucial in CPM to assess generalizability beyond the initial dataset. This ensures performance in diverse populations, reliability and real-world applicability of the results. Therefore, we externally validated the tool for predictability of improvement in oswestry disability index (ODI), back and leg pain (BP, LP).
METHODS: Prospective and retrospective data from multicenter registry was obtained. As outcome measure minimum clinically important change was chosen for ODI with ≥ 15-point and ≥ 2-point reduction for numeric rating scales (NRS) for BP and LP 12 months after lumbar fusion for degenerative disease. We externally validate this tool by calculating discrimination and calibration metrics such as intercept, slope, Brier Score, expected/observed ratio, Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL), AUC, sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: We included 1115 patients, average age 60.8 ± 12.5 years. For 12-month ODI, area-under-the-curve (AUC) was 0.70, the calibration intercept and slope were 1.01 and 0.84, respectively. For NRS BP, AUC was 0.72, with calibration intercept of 0.97 and slope of 0.87. For NRS LP, AUC was 0.70, with calibration intercept of 0.04 and slope of 0.72. Sensitivity ranged from 0.63 to 0.96, while specificity ranged from 0.15 to 0.68. Lack of fit was found for all three models based on HL testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing data from a multinational registry, we externally validate the SCOAP-CERTAIN prediction tool. The model demonstrated fair discrimination and calibration of predicted probabilities, necessitating caution in applying it in clinical practice. We suggest that future CPMs focus on predicting longer-term prognosis for this patient population, emphasizing the significance of robust calibration and thorough reporting.

Purpose: This study aims to elucidate the role of quantitative SSTR-PET metrics and clinicopathological biomarkers in the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Methods: A retrospective analysis including 91 NET patients (M47/F44; age 66 years, range 34-90 years) who completed four cycles of standard 177Lu-DOTATATE was conducted. SSTR-avid tumors were segmented from pretherapy SSTR-PET images using a semiautomatic workflow with the tumors labeled based on the anatomical regions. Multiple image-based features including total and organ-specific tumor volume and SSTR density along with clinicopathological biomarkers including Ki-67, chromogranin A (CgA) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were analyzed with respect to the PRRT response. Results: The median OS was 39.4 months (95% CI: 33.1-NA months), while the median PFS was 23.9 months (95% CI: 19.3-32.4 months). Total SSTR-avid tumor volume (HR = 3.6; P = 0.07) and bone tumor volume (HR = 1.5; P = 0.003) were associated with shorter OS. Also, total tumor volume (HR = 4.3; P = 0.01), liver tumor volume (HR = 1.8; P = 0.05) and bone tumor volume (HR = 1.4; P = 0.01) were associated with shorter PFS. Furthermore, the presence of large lesion volume with low SSTR uptake was correlated with worse OS (HR = 1.4; P = 0.03) and PFS (HR = 1.5; P = 0.003). Among the biomarkers, elevated baseline CgA and ALP showed a negative association with both OS (CgA: HR = 4.9; P = 0.003, ALP: HR = 52.6; P = 0.004) and PFS (CgA: HR = 4.2; P = 0.002, ALP: HR = 9.4; P = 0.06). Similarly, number of prior systemic treatments was associated with shorter OS (HR = 1.4; P = 0.003) and PFS (HR = 1.2; P = 0.05). Additionally, tumors originating from the midgut primary site demonstrated longer PFS, compared to the pancreas (HR = 1.6; P = 0.16), and those categorized as unknown primary (HR = 3.0; P = 0.002). Conclusion: Image-based features such as SSTR-avid tumor volume, bone tumor involvement, and the presence of large tumors with low SSTR expression demonstrated significant predictive value for PFS, suggesting potential clinical utility in NETs management. Moreover, elevated CgA and ALP, along with an increased number of prior systemic treatments, emerged as significant factors associated with worse PRRT outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: For infants with single ventricle heart disease, the time after stage 2 procedure (S2P) is believed to be a lower risk period compared with the interstage period; however, significant morbidity and mortality still occur.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to identify risk factors for mortality or transplantation referral between S2P surgery and the first birthday.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort analysis of infants in the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative who underwent staged single ventricle palliation from 2016 to 2022 and survived to S2P. Multivariable logistic regression and classification and regression trees were performed to identify risk factors for mortality and transplantation referral after S2P.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 1,455 patients in the cohort who survived to S2P, 5.2% died and 2.3% were referred for transplant. Overall event rates at 30 and 100 days after S2P were 2% and 5%, respectively. Independent risk factors for mortality and transplantation referral included the presence of a known genetic syndrome, shunt type at stage 1 procedure (S1P), tricuspid valve repair at S1P, longer time to extubation and reintubation after S1P, ≥ moderate tricuspid regurgitation prior to S2P, younger age at S2P, and the risk groups identified in the classification and regression tree analysis (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after S1P and longer S2P cardiopulmonary bypass time without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation).
UNASSIGNED: Mortality and transplantation referral rates after S2P to 1 year of age remain high ∼7%. Many of the identified risk factors after S2P are similar to those established for interstage factors around the S1P, whereas others may be unique to the period after S2P.

The current era of big data offers a wealth of new opportunities for clinicians to leverage artificial intelligence to optimize care for pediatric and adult patients with a congenital heart disease. At present, there is a significant underutilization of artificial intelligence in the clinical setting for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of congenital heart disease patients. This document is a call to action and will describe the current state of artificial intelligence in congenital heart disease, review challenges, discuss opportunities, and focus on the top priorities of artificial intelligence-based deployment in congenital heart disease.

Digital data processing has revolutionized medical documentation and enabled the aggregation of patient data across hospitals. Initiatives such as those from the AO Foundation about fracture treatment (AO Sammelstudie, 1986), the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) about survival, and the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) pioneered multi-hospital data collection. Large trauma registries, like the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU) helped improve evidence levels but were still constrained by predefined data sets and limited physiological parameters. The improvement in the understanding of pathophysiological reactions substantiated that decision making about fracture care led to development of patient\'s tailored dynamic approaches like the Safe Definitive Surgery algorithm. In the future, artificial intelligence (AI) may provide further steps by potentially transforming fracture recognition and/or outcome prediction. The evolution towards flexible decision making and AI-driven innovations may be of further help. The current manuscript summarizes the development of big data from local databases and subsequent trauma registries to AI-based algorithms, such as Parkland Trauma Mortality Index and the IBM Watson Pathway Explorer.

Pediatric Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas differ from adult cases in biology and management, yet there is a lack of survival analysis tailored to pediatric lymphoma. We analyzed lymphoma data from 1975 to 2018, comparing survival trends between 7,871 pediatric and 226,211 adult patients, identified key risk factors for pediatric lymphoma survival, developed a predictive nomogram, and utilized machine learning to predict long-term lymphoma-specific mortality risk. Between 1975 and 2018, we observed substantial increases in 1-year (19.3%), 5-year (41.9%), and 10-year (48.8%) overall survival rates in pediatric patients with lymphoma. Prognostic factors such as age, sex, race, Ann Arbor stage, lymphoma subtypes, and radiotherapy were incorporated into the nomogram. The nomogram exhibited excellent predictive performance with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.766, 0.724, and 0.703 for one-year, five-year, and ten-year survival, respectively, in the training cohort, and AUC values of 0.776, 0.712, and 0.696 in the validation cohort. Importantly, the nomogram outperformed the Ann Arbor staging system in survival prediction. Machine learning models achieved AUC values of approximately 0.75, surpassing the conventional method (AUC =  ~ 0.70) in predicting the risk of lymphoma-specific death. We also observed that pediatric lymphoma survivors had a substantially reduced risk of lymphoma after ten years b,ut faced an increasing risk of non-lymphoma diseases. The study highlights substantial improvements in pediatric lymphoma survival, offers reliable predictive tools, and underscores the importance of long-term monitoring for non-lymphoma health issues in pediatric patients.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To optimize our previously proposed TransRP, a model integrating CNN (convolutional neural network) and ViT (Vision Transformer) designed for recurrence-free survival prediction in oropharyngeal cancer and to extend its application to the prediction of multiple clinical outcomes, including locoregional control (LRC), Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS).
METHODS: Data was collected from 400 patients (300 for training and 100 for testing) diagnosed with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) who underwent (chemo)radiotherapy at University Medical Center Groningen. Each patient\'s data comprised pre-treatment PET/CT scans, clinical parameters, and clinical outcome endpoints, namely LRC, DMFS and OS. The prediction performance of TransRP was compared with CNNs when inputting image data only. Additionally, three distinct methods (m1-3) of incorporating clinical predictors into TransRP training and one method (m4) that uses TransRP prediction as one parameter in a clinical Cox model were compared.
RESULTS: TransRP achieved higher test C-index values of 0.61, 0.84 and 0.70 than CNNs for LRC, DMFS and OS, respectively. Furthermore, when incorporating TransRP\'s prediction into a clinical Cox model (m4), a higher C-index of 0.77 for OS was obtained. Compared with a clinical routine risk stratification model of OS, our model, using clinical variables, radiomics and TransRP prediction as predictors, achieved larger separations of survival curves between low, intermediate and high risk groups.
CONCLUSIONS: TransRP outperformed CNN models for all endpoints. Combining clinical data and TransRP prediction in a Cox model achieved better OS prediction.

Outcome prediction in prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC) remains challenging. This can result in either inappropriate withdrawal of treatment or unnecessary prolongation of treatment. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a cheap, portable, and non-invasive device with various opportunities for complex signal analysis. Computational EEG measures, such as EEG connectivity and network metrics, might be ideal candidates for the investigation of DOC, but their capacity in prognostication is still undisclosed. We conducted a meta-analysis aiming to compare the prognostic power of the widely used clinical scale, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised - CRS-R and EEG connectivity and network metrics. We found that the prognostic power of the CRS-R scale was moderate (AUC: 0.67 (0.60-0.75)), but EEG connectivity and network metrics predicted outcome with significantly (p = 0.0071) higher accuracy (AUC:0.78 (0.70-0.86)). We also estimated the prognostic capacity of EEG spectral power, which was not significantly (p = 0.3943) inferior to that of the EEG connectivity and graph-theory measures (AUC:0.75 (0.70-0.80)). Multivariate automated outcome prediction tools seemed to outperform clinical and EEG markers.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1217037.].