Nurse-led clinics

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:政策制定者和研究人员经常建议,护士可能在解决复杂疾病患者不断变化的需求方面发挥关键作用,通过担任高级角色并提供护理咨询。护理咨询在不同的环境和国家之间差异很大,他们的活动范围从补充到替代传统的由医生主导的咨询或常规护理。
    目的:本研究旨在描述在任何情况下对复杂患者进行护理咨询对患者预后的影响(生活质量,身体状况,社会心理健康,健康行为,药物依从性,死亡率,人体测量和生理结果,和患者满意度)和组织结果(卫生资源使用和成本)。
    方法:雨伞综述。
    方法:我们采用了JoannaBriggsInstitute的伞式评价方法。我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,Cochrane系统评论数据库和CINAHL,以确定以英语发表的相关文章,荷兰人,法语,2013年1月至2023年2月期间的西班牙语或德语。我们包括系统的文献综述,有或没有荟萃分析,其中包括在高收入国家进行的随机对照试验.如果评论涉及由专业护士或高级护士从业人员领导的咨询,则符合资格。文章选择,数据提取和质量评估由至少两名评审员独立进行.
    结果:我们纳入了基于473项独特试验的50项系统综述。对于所有患者结果,护理咨询取得的效果至少相当于医生主导的咨询或常规护理的效果(即,非自卑)。为了生活质量,健康行为,药物依从性,死亡率和患者满意度,超过一半的荟萃分析发现,有利于护理咨询的统计学显著影响(即,优势)。必须谨慎解释成本结果,因为提取了很少和异构的成本相关数据,成本分析的方法学质量值得怀疑。叙事综合证实了荟萃分析的总体结论。
    结论:护理咨询对医疗环境中复杂健康状况患者的影响似乎至少与医生主导的咨询或常规护理相似。在生活质量方面,护理咨询似乎比医生主导的咨询或常规护理更有效,健康行为,死亡率,患者满意度和药物依从性。有必要对原始数据进行进一步分析,以确定护理咨询最有效的患者人群和设置。中等学习质量,系统评价之间和内部的多样性,报告的质量阻碍了调查结果的强度。
    BACKGROUND: Policymakers and researchers often suggest that nurses may play a crucial role in addressing the evolving needs of patients with complex conditions, by taking on advanced roles and providing nursing consultations. Nursing consultations vary widely across settings and countries, and their activities range from complementing to substituting traditional physician-led consultations or usual care.
    OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed at describing the effects of nursing consultations with patients with complex conditions in any setting on patient outcomes (quality of life, physical status, psychosocial health, health behaviour, medication adherence, mortality, anthropometric and physiological outcomes, and patient satisfaction) and organisational outcomes (health resource use and costs).
    METHODS: Umbrella review.
    METHODS: We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute method for umbrella reviews. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL to identify relevant articles published in English, Dutch, French, Spanish or German between January 2013 and February 2023. We included systematic literature reviews, with or without meta-analyses, that included randomised controlled trials conducted in high-income countries. Reviews were eligible if they pertained to consultations led by specialised nurses or advanced nurse practitioners. Article selection, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed independently by at least two reviewers.
    RESULTS: We included 50 systematic reviews based on 473 unique trials. For all patient outcomes, nursing consultations achieved effects at least equivalent to those of physician-led consultations or usual care (i.e., non-inferiority). For quality of life, health behaviour, medication adherence, mortality and patient satisfaction, more than half the meta-analyses found statistically significant effects in favour of nursing consultations (i.e., superiority). Cost results must be interpreted with caution, because very few and heterogeneous cost-related data were extracted, and the methodological quality of the cost analyses was questionable. Narrative syntheses confirmed the overall conclusions of the meta-analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: The effects of nursing consultations on patients with complex health conditions across healthcare settings appear to be at least similar to physician-led consultations or usual care. Nursing consultations appear to be more effective than physician-led consultations or usual care in terms of quality of life, health behaviour, mortality, patient satisfaction and medication adherence. Further analysis of the primary data is necessary to determine the patient populations and settings in which nursing consultations are most effective. Moderate study quality, diversity amongst and within systematic reviews, and quality of reporting hamper the strength of the findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行及其社会限制加速了虚拟临床护理的扩展,据报道这是安全的,低成本和灵活。
    本研究旨在检查糖尿病患者的护理实践和患者对计划外护士主导的虚拟护理的满意度。
    对临床护士专家和患者进行了横断面描述性调查,使用活动日志进行护理实践,并对来电者进行满意度和支持调查。
    患者报告说,在接受虚拟护理后,患者对保持健康的满意度和更大的自信心。大多数来自患者的电话(74.8%)是为了咨询和教育。每个电话平均导致临床护士专家采取2.5次行动。
    该服务具有很高的价值和有效性,但增加了护士的工作量负担。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic and its social restrictions accelerated the expansion of virtual clinical care, and this has been reported to be safe, low cost and flexible.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to examine nursing practices and patient satisfaction with unscheduled nurse-led virtual care for people with diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional descriptive survey of clinical nurse specialists and patients was carried out, using an activities log for nursing practices and a satisfaction and enablement survey for callers.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients reported high satisfaction levels and greater self-confidence in keeping themselves healthy after receiving virtual care. Most calls (74.8%) from patients were for advice and education. Each call led to an average of 2.5 actions for the clinical nurse specialist.
    UNASSIGNED: The service is highly valued and is effective, but adds to the nurse workload burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨围手术期护士主导的咨询干预对未满足需求的影响。结直肠癌患者的性功能和生活质量。
    方法:这项准实验研究包括82例接受结直肠癌手术的患者(对照n=45,干预n=37)。基于电话的围手术期护士主导的咨询干预,其中包含实施,后续行动,和评估,从手术前开始到手术后第3个月。数据是用癌症幸存者未满足需求量表收集的,欧洲癌症治疗和研究组织生活质量量表-30,结肠直肠-29,女性性功能指数,和国际勃起功能指数术前和术后第3-6个月。控制数据是在大流行之前收集的,以及整个大流行期间的干预组。Mann-Whitney-U,使用Wilcoxon秩检验。
    结果:与对照组相比,干预组患者报告较低的未满足和总需求得分(p=0.000);较高的生活质量(p=0.000),物理,情绪(p=0.000),角色(p=0.001),和社会功能得分(p=0.002);较低的疲劳(p=0.000),便秘(p=0.034),疼痛(p=0.018),恶心呕吐(p=0.004),失眠得分(p=0.003);和更高的身体形象,焦虑(p=0.000)和体重评分(p=0.003),下尿频臀部疼痛(p=0.000),排尿困难(p=0.001),腹痛(p=0.001),波动(p=0.000),大便频率(p=0.002),6个月时大便失禁(p=0.006)评分(p<0.05)。男女性功能评分差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
    结论:围手术期护士主导的咨询减少了未满足的需求,并通过降低症状水平提高了整体生活质量,但不影响结直肠癌手术患者的性健康结局。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of perioperative nurse-led counselling intervention on unmet needs, sexual function and quality of life in colorectal cancer patients.
    METHODS: This quasi-experimental study included 82 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery (control n = 45, intervention n = 37). The telephone-based perioperative nurse-led counselling intervention, which contained implementation, follow-up, and assessment, was applied to start from pre-surgery to post-surgery 3rd month. Data were collected with the Unmet Needs of Cancer Survivors Scale, European Organisation for Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality of Life Scale-30, Colorectal-29, Female Sexual Function Index, and International Index of Erectile Function pre- and post-surgery 3rd-6th months. The control data was collected before the pandemic, and the intervention group throughout the pandemic. The Mann-Whitney-U, Wilcoxon rank test was used.
    RESULTS: Compared to the control group, intervention group patients reported lower unmet and total needs scores (p = 0.000); higher quality of life (p = 0.000), physical, emotional (p = 0.000), role (p = 0.001), and social functioning scores (p = 0.002); lower fatigue (p = 0.000), constipation (p = 0.034), pain (p = 0.018), nausea-vomiting (p = 0.004), and insomnia scores (p = 0.003); and higher body image, anxiety (p = 0.000) and weight scores (p = 0.003), lower urinary frequency buttock pain (p = 0.000), dysuria (p = 0.001), abdominal pain (p = 0.001), fluctuance (p = 0.000), stool frequency (p = 0.002), and faecal incontinence (p = 0.006) scores at the sixth month (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between male and female sexual function scores (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative nurse-led counselling reduced unmet needs and increased the overall quality of life by decreasing symptom levels but did not affect sexual health outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:作为最常见的心律失常类型,心房颤动(AF)正在逐步增加,每年有500万例新病例。最近的指南强调了使用多学科协作团队的重要性,以改善房颤患者管理期间的结果。以护士为主导的计划,包括以护士为主导的教育,咨询和干预已显示可改善房颤患者的预后.在这个分析中,我们旨在系统地比较被分配到护士主导的介入治疗方案和常规治疗组的房颤患者的临床结局.
    方法:EMBASE,MEDLINE,http://www。
    结果:政府,WebofScience;GoogleScholar和Cochrane数据库是数据源。临床结果被认为是本研究的终点。这是一个荟萃分析,采用RevMan软件(5.4版)进行统计分析。使用风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示统计分析后的数据。
    结果:共纳入6项研究,共2916名参与者,其中1434名参与者被分配到护士主导的干预,1482名参与者被分配到常规护理组。我们的结果表明,被分配到护士主导的介入组的房颤参与者的复合终点风险显着降低(RR:0.82,95%CI:0.70-0.96;P=0.01),心力衰竭(RR:0.66,95%CI:0.47-0.92;P=0.02),房颤(RR:0.77,95%CI:0.63-0.94;P=0.01)和再入院(RR:0.78,95%CI:0.62-0.99;P=0.04)。然而,全因死亡风险(RR:0.86,95%CI:0.68-1.09;P=0.21),心源性死亡(RR:0.67,95%CI:0.33-1.39;P=0.28),心肌梗死(RR:0.70,95%CI:0.35-1.42;P=0.33),卒中(RR:0.75,95%CI:0.44-1.26;P=0.28),所有出血事件(RR:1.11,95%CI:0.81-1.53;P=0.51)和大出血事件(RR:0.91,95%CI:0.56-1.49;P=0.71)无显著差异.
    结论:护士主导的介入方案显著改善了复合终点,包括心力衰竭和房颤复发,导致与常规护理组相比,入院率显着降低。然而,护士主导的介入计划不影响死亡率,中风,心肌梗死和出血事件。根据我们目前的结果,护士主导的介入治疗方案显然对房颤患者有益.未来更大的试验将能够证实这一假设。
    BACKGROUND: Being the most common type of arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation (AF) is progressively increasing with an annual rate of 5 million new cases. Recent guidelines highlight the importance of using collaborative multidisciplinary teams in order to improve outcomes during management of patients with AF. A nurse-led program including a nurse-directed education, counselling and intervention has shown to improve patients\' outcomes in candidates with AF. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the clinical outcomes observed in patients with AF who were assigned to a nurse-led interventional program versus a usual care group.
    METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Http://www.
    RESULTS: gov , Web of Science; Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were the data sources. The clinical outcomes were considered as the endpoints in this study. This is a meta-analysis, and the statistical analysis was conducted by the RevMan software (version 5.4). Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data after statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: Six studies with a total number 2916 participants were included whereby 1434 participants were assigned to a nurse-led intervention and 1482 participants were assigned to the usual care group. Our results showed that participants with AF who were assigned to the nurse-led interventional group had a significantly lower risk of composite endpoints (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.96; P = 0.01), heart failure (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47-0.92; P = 0.02), atrial fibrillation (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63-0.94; P = 0.01) and re-admission (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; P = 0.04). However, the risks of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68-1.09; P = 0.21), cardiac death (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.33-1.39; P = 0.28), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.35-1.42; P = 0.33), stroke (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.44-1.26; P = 0.28), all bleeding events (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.81-1.53; P = 0.51) and major bleeding events (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.56-1.49; P = 0.71) were not significantly different.
    CONCLUSIONS: The nurse-led interventional program significantly improved composite endpoints including heart failure and the recurrence of AF, resulting in a significantly lower admission rate compared to the usual care group. However, nurse-led interventional program did not affect mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction and bleeding events. Based on our current results, a nurse-led interventional programs apparently could be beneficial in patients with AF. Future larger trials would be able to confirm this hypothesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是全球患者死亡的主要原因之一。据世界卫生组织(WHO)报道,大约80%的心血管疾病可以通过改变生活方式来预防。CAD的管理涉及心血管危险因素的预防和控制,侵入性和非侵入性治疗,包括冠状动脉血运重建,坚持适当的药物治疗和定期门诊随访。护士主导的诊所主要是为了提供支持,教育,预防措施和对患者的心理支持,与治疗诊所完全不同。我们的审查重点是护士在心血管疾病的一级和二级预防和管理中的参与和意义。护士在介入心脏病学中起着至关重要的作用。它们在管理包括充血性心力衰竭在内的心脏并发症中也有重要作用,心房颤动和心脏移植。今天,护士主导的远程咨询策略的实施也获得了积极的意见。因此,在临床实践中,应实施护士主导的心血管疾病患者管理干预措施。基于治疗的进展,应开展更多的研究,以进一步调查护士主导的诊所在心血管疾病患者长期治疗和管理中的作用。
    Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one among the major causes of mortality in patients all around the globe. It has been reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) that approximately 80% of cardiovascular diseases could be prevented through lifestyle modifications. Management of CAD involves the prevention and control of cardiovascular risk factors, invasive and non-invasive treatments including coronary revascularizations, adherence to proper medications and regular outpatient follow-ups. Nurse-led clinics were intended to mainly provide supportive, educational, preventive measures and psychological support to the patients, which were completely different from therapeutic clinics. Our review focuses on the involvement and implication of nurses in the primary and secondary prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases. Nurses have a vital role in Interventional cardiology. They also have major roles during the management of cardiac complications including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation and heart transplantation. Today, the implementation of a nurse-led tele-consultation strategy is also gaining positive views. Therefore, a nurse-led intervention for the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases should be implemented in clinical practice. Based on advances in therapy, more research should be carried out to further investigate the effect of nurse-led clinics during the long-term treatment and management of patients with cardiovascular diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长效丁丙诺啡注射剂用于阿片类药物使用障碍已被广泛预示为突破性治疗,几项研究表明,当使用这些药物时,结果是积极的。在许多地方,执业护士开处方,administrate,并监测长效注射制剂。本文的目的是探讨分配的针头和注射器的减少是否归因于LAIB处方的增加。我们对通过卫生服务针头和注射器程序自动售货机分配的针头进行了回顾性审核,以及由执业护士领导的模型用长效注射丁丙诺啡治疗的个体。此外,我们研究了可能影响分配针头数量变化的潜在因素.线性回归发现,使用长效可注射丁丙诺啡治疗的阿片类药物依赖患者每个月分配的针头减少90个(p<0.001)。执业护士领导的阿片类药物依赖患者的护理模型似乎影响了针头和注射器计划中分配的针头数量。尽管所有混杂因素都不能完全打折扣,如物质可用性,负担能力,以及在其他地方获得注射设备的个人,我们的研究表明,在研究环境中,一名执业护士领导的阿片类药物使用障碍患者治疗模型影响了针头和注射器的分配.
    The introduction of long-acting injectable buprenorphine preparations for opioid use disorder has been widely heralded as a breakthrough treatment, with several studies indicating positive results when using these medications. In many locations, nurse practitioners prescribe, administer, and monitor long-acting injectable preparations. The objective of this paper is to explore whether a reduction in dispensed needles and syringes is attributable to increased nurse practitioner prescribing of LAIB. We used a retrospective audit of needles dispensed through the health service needle and syringe program vending machine, and individuals treated with long-acting injectable buprenorphine by the nurse practitioner led model. In addition, we examined potential factors that may influence changes in the number of needles dispensed. Linear regression found that each individual with opioid dependence treated with long-acting injectable buprenorphine was associated with 90 fewer needles dispensed each month (p < 0.001). The nurse practitioner led model of care for individuals with opioid dependence appears to have influenced the number of needles dispensed at the needle and syringe program. Although all confounding factors could not be discounted entirely, such as substance availability, affordability, and individuals obtaining injecting equipment elsewhere, our research indicates that a nurse practitioner led model of treating individuals with opioid use disorder influenced needle and syringe dispensing in the study setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:认知评估服务被发现对有认知投诉的老年人有益,但对所提供建议的依从性的信息有限。这项研究旨在确定在香港参加社区护士主导的认知评估服务后,客户对护理建议的依从性的预测因素。
    方法:采用横断面设计。我们分析了2012年1月至2018年1月期间从参加服务的客户那里收集的常规数据集。进行多元回归分析以确定预测因子(人口统计,功能健康状况和认知表现)客户的依从性。还检查了他们对服务的满意度。
    结果:两百二十三名客户到诊所就诊。在咨询后6个月完成电话随访的133人中,44.1%的人不遵守建议。具有较高临床痴呆评级的客户(OR=4.17),发现较低的时钟绘制测试评分(OR=1.13)和较低的教育水平(OR=0.91)不太可能遵循护理建议。百分之九十六(190/198)对整体服务感到满意。
    结论:护士主导诊所的认知评估服务可以为有认知问题的老年人提供自我转诊服务。然而,认知功能较差,受教育程度较低的患者对护理建议的依从性较低.
    OBJECTIVE: Cognitive assessment services were found to be beneficial to older people with cognitive complaints but information is limited on adherence to the recommendations provided. This study aimed to identify predictors of clients\' adherence to nursing recommendations after attending a community-based nurse-led cognitive assessment service in Hong Kong.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional design was adopted. We analysed a dataset routinely collected from clients attending the services between January 2012 and January 2018. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors (demographics, functional health status and cognitive performance) of the clients\' adherence. Their satisfaction with the services was also examined.
    RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-three clients attended the clinic. Of the 133 who completed the telephone follow-up at the 6 months postconsultation, 44.1% did not adhere to the recommendations. Clients with a higher Clinical Dementia Rating (OR = 4.17), lower Clock Drawing Test score (OR = 1.13) and lower education level (OR = 0.91) were found to be less likely to adhere to the nursing recommendations. Ninety-six percent (190/198) were satisfied with the overall services.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive assessment services in nurse-led clinics could provide a self-referred service for older people with cognitive complaints. However, low adherence to nursing recommendations was found among clients with poorer cognitive functions and lower education levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在遇到系统性更大的医疗保健障碍的社区中,缺乏获得初级和行为医疗保健的机会很普遍。这项研究描述了在护士主导的初级保健诊所中实施协调护理模式,并确定了持续整合的基本要素。使用混合方法解释性序贯研究设计来收集和分析定量和定性数据。参与者报告了整合前后整合水平的总体统计学上的显着平均增加(M=2.47,SD±2.01,p<0.001)。定性结果表明,团队优势的优化和突出,整体护理的Lundeen模式,解决身体和心理障碍导致持续的融合水平。综合做法对于评估和支持个人的整体需求至关重要,家庭,和社区。未来的研究应该检查促进或障碍,在其他医疗机构的综合实践,综合护理客户的长期健康结果,以及整合的成本效益。
    Lack of access to primary and behavioral healthcare is prevalent in communities experiencing systematically greater obstacles to healthcare. This study describes the implementation of the Coordinated Care Model in a nurse-led primary care clinic and identifies the essential factors for sustained integration. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential study design was used to collect and analyze quantitative and qualitative data. Participants reported an overall statistically significant mean increase (M = 2.47, SD ± 2.01, p < 0.001) in the level of integration pre-and post-integration. Qualitative results indicated that the optimization and accentuation of team strengths, the Lundeen model of holistic care, and addressing physical and psychological barriers lead to sustained level of integration. Integrated practices are essential in assessing and supporting the holistic needs of individuals, families, and communities. Future studies should examine facilitators or impediments to integrated practice in other healthcare settings, long-term health outcomes of clients in integrated care, and the cost-effectiveness of integration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: RA should be treated to target in a process of shared decision-making with patients. Person-centred care is essential to meeting specific patient needs. Nurse-led clinics, where a nurse is responsible for care, have demonstrated added value in some countries but are still not implemented widely. This study aimed to explore stakeholders\' perceptions of advantages, disadvantages and conditions for the implementation of nurse-led clinics for RA in Belgium.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a cross-sectional qualitative study consisting of five semi-structured focus group interviews. Rheumatology nurses, patients with RA and rheumatologists were interviewed as stakeholders. The analysis was carried out by three researchers according to the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL), formulating a conceptual framework of overarching themes and deconstructing this into perceived advantages, disadvantages and conditions.
    UNASSIGNED: Two focus groups with nurses (total n = 16), two with patients (n = 17) and one with rheumatologists (n = 9) were conducted. The interview synthesis resulted in five overarching themes across stakeholders: efficiency of care, disease management, legal and organizational requirements, the conventional role of the nurse and the extended role of the nurse. All stakeholders perceived additional education for nurses as essential, but rheumatologists debated nurses\' abilities to lead a rheumatology clinic. Furthermore, patients preferred care protocols to guide nurses, and care providers approached this reluctantly. Generally, patients with a well-controlled disease were perceived as the ideal candidates for nurse-led care.
    UNASSIGNED: Nurse-led clinics could provide many benefits but require additional nurse education and a legal and organizational framework before being implemented widely and successfully.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims at exploring the effectiveness of nurse-led advanced practice for patients with cancer.
    METHODS: This review followed the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Randomised controlled trials on cancer nurse-led clinics for patient outcomes, costs, service utilisation and other outcomes were included. Databases such as MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsychINFO were searched based on MeSH terms. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise results of the included studies.
    RESULTS: Seventeen articles were included, published between 2001 and 2019. There were methodological shortcomings with a number of the studies reviewed. Five themes were identified including (1) rationale for developing nurse-led clinics, (2) mode of delivery of nurse-led clinics, (3) the content of nurse-led clinics, (4) exploring patient outcomes and (5) satisfaction with nurse-led clinics.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results support the effectiveness of nurse-led clinics in improving self-reported responses such as distress levels, satisfaction, quality of life, depressive symptoms, concerns and vomiting among cancer patients. Following a sound protocol for both the study and the reporting is recommended, and future studies should focus more on costs and effectiveness of different models of care administered by advanced practice nurses. Effectiveness of nurse-led clinics needs further evaluation with stronger trials and wider focus on nursing-sensitive clinical outcomes and costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号