OBJECTIVE: To clarify the mechanistic basis for the success or failure of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF).
METHODS: We created digital twins based on mechanistic computational models of individual patients with AHRF.
METHODS: Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Systems Medicine Research Network.
METHODS: We used individual patient data from 30 moderate-to-severe AHRF patients who had failed high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and subsequently underwent a trial of NIV.
METHODS: Using the digital twins, we evaluated lung mechanics, quantified the separate contributions of external support and patient respiratory effort to lung injury indices, and investigated their relative impact on NIV success or failure.
RESULTS: In digital twins of patients who successfully completed/failed NIV, after 2 hours of the trial the mean (sd) of the change in total lung stress was -10.9 (6.2)/-0.35 (3.38) cm H2O, mechanical power -13.4 (12.2)/-1.0 (5.4) J/min, and total lung strain 0.02 (0.24)/0.16 (0.30). In the digital twins, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) produced by HFNC was similar to that set during NIV. In digital twins of patients who failed NIV vs. those who succeeded, intrinsic PEEP was 3.5 (0.6) vs. 2.3 (0.8) cm H2O, inspiratory pressure support was 8.3 (5.9) vs. 22.3 (7.2) cm H2O, and tidal volume was 10.9 (1.2) vs. 9.4 (1.8) mL/kg. In digital twins, successful NIV increased respiratory system compliance +25.0 (16.4) mL/cm H2O, lowered inspiratory muscle pressure -9.7 (9.6) cm H2O, and reduced the contribution of patient spontaneous breathing to total driving pressure by 57.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: In digital twins of AHRF patients, successful NIV improved lung mechanics, lowering respiratory effort and indices associated with lung injury. NIV failed in patients for whom only low levels of positive inspiratory pressure support could be applied without risking patient self-inflicted lung injury due to excessive tidal volumes.

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants often require non-invasive breathing support while their lungs and control of respiration are still developing. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) is an emerging technology that allows infants to breathe spontaneously while receiving support breaths proportional to their effort. This study describes the first Australian Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) experience of NIV-NAVA.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of infants admitted to a major tertiary NICU between October 2017 and April 2021 supported with NIV-NAVA. Infants were divided into three groups based on the indication to initiate NIV-NAVA (post-extubation; apnoea; escalation). Successful application of NIV-NAVA was based on the need for re-intubation within 48 h of application.
RESULTS: There were 169 NIV-NAVA episodes in 122 infants (82 post-extubation; 21 apnoea; 66 escalation). The median (range) gestational age at birth was 25 + 5 weeks (23 + 1 to 43 + 3 weeks) and median (range) birthweight was 963 g (365-4320 g). At NIV-NAVA application, mean (SD) age was 17 days (18.2), and median (range) weight was 850 g (501-4310 g). Infants did not require intubation within 48 h in 145/169 (85.2%) episodes [72/82 (87.8%) extubation; 21/21 (100%) apnoea; 52/66 (78.8%) escalation).
CONCLUSIONS: NIV-NAVA was successfully integrated for the three main indications (escalation; post-extubation; apnoea). Prospective clinical trials are still required to establish its effectiveness versus other modes of non-invasive support.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been the cornerstone for managing acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) with hypercapnic respiratory failure. Nasal high flow (NHF) oxygen therapy has emerged as a potential alternative, offering a more tolerable modality with promising outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether NHF respiratory support is noninferior to NIV with respect to treatment failure, in patients with mild-to-moderate hypercapnic AECOPD.
METHODS: In this multi-center, randomized, noninferiority trial, 105 patients with AECOPD and respiratory failure type II were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either NHF therapy or NIV. The primary endpoint was the frequency of treatment failure, defined as the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation or a switch to the alternative treatment group. Secondary endpoints included changes in respiratory parameters, patient comfort indicators, and the occurrence of complications.
RESULTS: The findings revealed no significant difference in the primary outcome between the groups, with a treatment failure rate of 19.6 % (10 out of 51) in the NHF group and 14.8 % (8 out of 54) in the NIV group. Interestingly, NHF users reported significantly lower levels of dyspnea and discomfort at multiple follow-up points. Despite the differences in patient comfort, respiratory parameters such as respiratory rate, arterial blood gases, and use of accessory muscles of respiration showed no significant disparities between the groups throughout the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: NHF therapy was similar to NIV in preventing treatment failure among patients with hypercapnic AECOPD, offering a viable alternative with enhanced comfort.
BACKGROUND: The study was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03466385) on March 15, 2018.

UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between demographic, clinical, and interface factors and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) usage.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort analysis of 478 patients prescribed NIV from 2013 to 2021 was performed. Demographic factors, clinical indications for NIV, and interface factors were collected, and linear regression was conducted to evaluate the association between these variables and NIV usage (hour/night).
UNASSIGNED: The average usage of the cohort was 6.5 hour/night ± 4.6, with an average age of 57 years ± 16 and body mass index (BMI) of 40.5kg/m2 ± 14.7. The cohort was mostly male (n = 290, 60.6%). The most common indications for NIV prescription were high-pressure requirement for obstructive sleep apnea (HPR, n = 190, 39.7%), neuromuscular disease (NMD, n = 140, 29.3%), and obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS, n = 111, 23.2%). A diagnosis of NMD was a significant predictor of higher NIV usage (8.0 ± 6.1 hour/night) in multivariate analysis (p = .036). The HPR subcohort had the lowest usage of all indications. Age and BMI did not predict usage. A nasal interface (p < .01) and lower expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) setting (p < .001) were associated with increased NIV usage.
UNASSIGNED: This study highlights the multifaceted nature of NIV usage. Where demographic factors were not consistent predictors of usage, interface, and clinical indication were associated with usage. These findings highlight that the HPR users are a group at risk of low usage.

暂无摘要。

Palliative care is important for many patients who require noninvasive ventilation. The particular needs of patients with neuromuscular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are explored. Advance care planning is explored with tips for undertaking this important communication task. Brief comments regarding symptom burden, weaning, voluntary assisted dying, and self-care are included.

High-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has an increasing role in the management of acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Due to its tolerable interface and ease of use, its role in chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF) is emerging. This article examines the literature to date surrounding the short and long-term mechanisms of HFNT in sleep and wakefulness of CHRF patients. It is likely HFNT will have an increasing role in those patients intolerant of non-invasive ventilation.

Telemonitoring in non-invasive ventilation is constantly evolving to enable follow-up of adults and children. Depending on the device and manufacturer, different ventilator variables are displayed on web-based platforms. However, high-granularity measurement is not always available remotely, which precludes breath-by-breath waveforms and precise monitoring of nocturnal gas exchange. Therefore, telemonitoring is mainly useful for monitoring utilization of the device, leaks, and respiratory events. Coordinated relationships between patients, homecare providers, and hospital teams are necessary to transform available data into diagnosis and actions. Telemonitoring is time and cost-consuming. The balance between cost, workload, and clinical benefit should be further evaluated.

The choice of interface used to deliver noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is a critical element in successfully and safely establishing home NIV in people with sleep hypoventilation syndromes. Both patient-related and equipment-related factors need to be considered when selecting an interface. Recognizing specific issues that can occur with a particular style of mask is important when troubleshooting NIV problems and attempting to minimize side effects. Access to a range of mask styles and designs to use on a rotational basis is especially important for patients using NIV on a more continuous basis, those at risk of developing pressure areas, and children.

Initiation of home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) requires careful consideration of the patient\'s condition, motivation, expectations, wishes, and social circumstances. The decision to start NIV depends on a combination of factors including patient symptoms and objective evidence of nocturnal hypoventilation. A solid understanding of the underlying pathophysiology is key to a systematic and well-balanced clinical approach to titrating NIV. The location where NIV is initiated is not the most relevant issue, provided that it is a comfortable, safe environment in which adequate monitoring can be assured. The majority of patients prefer their own home for treatment initiation.