BACKGROUND: For patients with sepsis receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV), early rehabilitation is crucial. The Sitting Baduanjin (SBE) is an efficient early rehabilitation exercise suitable for bed patients. There is no consensus about the effect of SBE on the early rehabilitation of septic patients with NIV. This study focused on how the SBE affected the early rehabilitation of sepsis patients with NIV.
METHODS: 96 sepsis patients with NIV were randomly assigned to either an Baduanjin group that received the SBE based on the routine rehabilitation exercise (n = 48) or a control group (n = 48) that received routine rehabilitation exercise. The primary outcome was the Medical Research Council(MRC)score, and the Barthel Index score, the duration of NIV, length of ICU stay, length of total stay, hospitalization expense as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 245 sepsis patients were screened, with 96 randomly assigned. The study was completed by 90 patients out of the 96 participants.Results revealed that the MRC score increased in both groups, but the improvement of muscle strength in Baduanjin group was more obvious, with statistical significance (p < 0.001).There was statistically significantly difference between the two groups in Barthel Index at the day of transfer out of ICU(P = 0.028).The patients in the Baduanjin group had an average reduction of 24.09 h in the duration of NIV and 3.35 days in total length of hospital stay compared with the control group (p < 0.05).Of note, the Baduanjin group had significantly reduction the total hospitalization expense. No serious adverse events occurred during the intervention period.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sepsis, the SBE appears to improve muscle strength and activities of daily living (ADL), and lowed the duration of NIV, the length of the total stay, and the hospitalization expense.
BACKGROUND: The study registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ), Clinical Trials identifier ChiCTR1800015011 (28/02/2018).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the evidence-based practice of prevention and care of nasal and facial pressure injuries in patients with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) using the knowledge to action framework (KTA), and to explore its effectiveness.
METHODS: Using an evidence-based nursing approach, an evidence-based practice group was established to formulate a clinical problem, the literature from domestic and international databases were researched for relevant evidence, the evidence was introduced into clinical scenarios, an evidence-based practice plan was developed, and a strategy for applying the best evidence was constructed by conducting a baseline review of healthcare professionals and patients with NPPV, analyzing barriers and promoting factors, and making changes in clinical practice at the organizational level, the practitioner level, and the patient level. Purposive sampling method was used to select the healthcare staff of the cardiac surgical intensive care unit (CSICU) of the Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, as well as the patients with NPPV admitted from October 1 to November 15, 2023 (pre-evidence-based practice) and November 16 to December 31 (post-evidence-based practice), as the subjects of the study. Through questionnaire analysis, the incidence of nasal and facial pressure injury of NPPV patients, the implementation rate of review indicators of medical staff, the score of the knowledge, belief and conduct of medical staff, and the compliance and comfort of patients before and after evidence-based practice were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 52 medical staff were included, aged (28.54±6.50) years old, with 3.00 (1.00, 12.75) years of working experience; 2 doctoral degree holders (3.85%), 4 master degree holders (7.69%), 46 bachelor degree holders (88.46%); 2 with senior title (3.85%), 17 with intermediate title (32.69%), and 33 junior titles (63.46%). Fifty patient questionnaires were collected before and after evidence-based nursing practice; the differences between before and after evidence-based practice in terms of gender, age, body weight, duration of ventilator usage, 24-hour bleeding and total bleeding were not statistically significant and were comparable. Compared with the pre-evidence-based practice, after carrying out the corresponding evidence-based nursing practice, the incidence of nasal and facial pressure injuries of NPPV patients decreased from 16.00% (8/50) to 4.00% (2/50, P < 0.05), the total implementation rate of review indicators of medical staff increased from 79.73% to 94.08% (P < 0.01), and the total scores of knowledge, belief and conduct were significantly improved (141.96±13.88 vs. 114.65±19.72, P < 0.05), and compliance and comfort of patients were significantly improved (compliance score: 4.60±0.99 vs. 5.82±1.42, comfort score: 4.10±1.63 vs. 6.92±2.33, both P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The application of an evidence-based nursing approach to obtain evidence related to the prevention of nasal and facial pressure injuries in patients with NPPV can be used to guide clinical practice, significantly reducing the incidence of nasal and facial pressure injuries in such patients, improving the implementation rate of review indicators and the knowledge, belief, and conduct scores of medical staff, and enhancing compliance and comfort of NPPV patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application effect of early awake prone position in mild-to-moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients, and analyze the related factors affecting the prone position outcome.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted. The mild-to-moderate ARDS patients admitted to the emergency department of Yingshang County People\'s Hospital from January 2020 to June 2023 were enrolled as the research subjects. According to the results of prone tolerance test, the patients were divided into awake prone position group and non-prone position group. All patients were given high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) according to the standard procedures. The patients in the awake prone position group received prone position treatment within 12 hours after admission, in addition to the standard treatment. This could be performed in several times, at least once a day, and at least 2 hours each time. In order to prolong the prone position as much as possible, the patients were allowed to move or keep a small angle side prone. The changes of oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after admission, the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, the use rate and use time of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), the total hospital stay, and the daily prone position time and 2-hour ROX index [ratio of pulse oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) and respiratory rate (RR)] of prone position patients were recorded. The successful termination of HFNC was defined as the successful prone position, and the failure of prone position was defined as switching to NIV or transferring to ICU. Subgroup analysis was performed, and the binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the influencing factors of the early awake prone position outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were finally enrolled, with 61 in the awake prone position group and 46 in the non-prone position group. Both groups showed a gradual increase in PaO2/FiO2 with prolonged admission time. The PaO2/FiO2 at 24 hours after admission in the awake prone position group was significantly higher than that at 0 hour [mmHg (1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 191.94±17.86 vs. 179.24±29.27, P < 0.05], while the difference in the non-prone position group was only statistically significant at 72 hours (mmHg: 198.24±17.99 vs. 181.24±16.62, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the PaO2/FiO2 at 48 hours and 72 hours after admission in the awake prone position group was significantly higher than that in the non-prone position group. The use rate of NIV in the awake prone position group was significantly lower than that in the non-prone position group [36.1% (22/61) vs. 56.5% (26/46), P < 0.05]; Kaplan-Meier curve analysis further confirmed that the patients in the awake prone position group used NIV later, and the cumulative rate of NIV usage was significantly lower than that in the non-prone position group (Log-Rank test: χ 2 = 5.402, P = 0.020). Compared with the non-prone position group, the ICU transfer rate in the awake prone position group was significantly lowered [11.5% (7/61) vs. 28.3% (13/46), P < 0.05], and the HFNC time, NIV time, and total hospital stay were significantly shortened [HFNC time (days): 5.71±1.45 vs. 7.24±3.36, NIV time (days): 3.27±1.28 vs. 4.40±1.47, total hospital stay (days): 11 (7, 13) vs. 14 (10, 19), all P < 0.05]. Of the 61 patients who underwent awake prone positioning, 39 were successful, and 22 failed. Compared with the successful group, the patients in the failure group had a higher body mass index [BMI (kg/m2): 26.61±4.70 vs. 22.91±5.50, P < 0.05], lower PaO2/FiO2, proportion of asymptomatic hypoxemia and 2-hour ROX index of prone position [PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg): 163.73±24.73 vs. 185.69±28.87, asymptomatic hypoxemia proportion: 18.2% (4/22) vs. 46.2% (18/39), 2-hour ROX index of prone position: 5.75±1.18 vs. 7.21±1.45, all P < 0.05], and shorter daily prone positioning time (hours: 5.87±2.85 vs. 8.05±1.99, P < 0.05). Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that all these factors were influencing factors for the outcome of awake prone positioning (all P < 0.05), among which BMI [odds ratio (OR) = 1.447, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.105-2.063] and non-asymptomatic hypoxemia (OR = 13.274, 95%CI was 1.548-117.390) were risk factors for failure of prone position, while PaO2/FiO2 (OR = 0.831, 95%CI was 0.770-0.907), daily prone positioning time (OR = 0.482, 95%CI was 0.236-0.924), and 2-hour ROX index of prone position (OR = 0.381, 95%CI was 0.169-0.861) were protective factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Early awake prone positioning in patients with mild-to-moderate ARDS supported by HFNC is safe and feasible, reducing the use rate and duration of NIV, lowering the ICU transfer rate, and shortening the hospital stay. High BMI and non-asymptomatic hypoxemia are risk factors for failed prone position, while higher PaO2/FiO2 and the ROX index within 2 hours of prone position (the patient\'s good response to prone position), and prolonged daily prone position can improve the success rate of prone position.

BACKGROUND: Extremely preterm infants (EPIs) frequently encounter challenges in feeding due to their underdeveloped digestive systems. Attaining full enteral feeding at the earliest possible stage can facilitate the removal of vascular catheters and decrease catheter-related complications.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study comprising 145 extremely preterm infants with a gestational age < 28 weeks who underwent non-invasive mechanical ventilation at Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital between January 2019 and June 2020. The KMC group received standard nursing care along with KMC, while the control group received standard nursing care without KMC. KMC initiation took place three weeks after admission and continued for a period of two weeks or more while maintaining stable vital signs. We evaluated the rate of exclusive breastmilk feeding within 24 h prior to discharge and the time to full enteral feeding throughout hospitalization. Additionally, we conducted a multiple linear regression analysis to identify the independent factors associated with exclusive breastmilk feeding rates and the time to full enteral feeding.
RESULTS: The KMC group exhibited a significantly higher rate of exclusive breastmilk feeding in the 24 h before discharge in comparison to the Non-KMC group (52.8% vs. 31.5%, OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.24, 4.78). Moreover, the KMC group achieved full enteral feeding in a shorter duration than the Non-KMC group (43.1 ± 9.6 days vs. 48.7 ± 6.9 days, p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that KMC was an independent protective factor associated with improved exclusive breastmilk feeding rates (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.24, 4.78) and a reduction in the time to full enteral feeding (β -5.35, p < 0.001) in extremely preterm infants.
CONCLUSIONS: Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) can expedite the achievement of full enteral feeding and enhance exclusive breastmilk feeding rates in extremely preterm infants receiving non-invasive assisted ventilation. These findings highlight the beneficial effects of KMC on the feeding outcomes of this vulnerable population, underscoring the importance of implementing KMC as a part of comprehensive care for extremely preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: A high-flow nasal cannula (cHFNC) delivers flow continuously (during inspiration and expiration). Using the diaphragm electrical activity (Edi), synchronizing HFNC could be an alternative (cycling high/low flow on inspiration/expiration, respectively). The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of synchronized HFNC (sHFNC) and compare it to cHFNC.
METHODS: Different levels of cHFNC and sHFNC (4, 6, 8, and 10 liters per minute [LPM], with 2 LPM on expiration for sHFNC) were compared in eight rabbits (mean weight 3.16 kg), before and after acute lung injury (pre-ALI and post-ALI). Edi, tracheal pressure (Ptr), esophageal pressure (Pes), flow, and arterial CO2 were measured. In addition to the animal study, one 3.52 kg infant received sHFNC and cHFNC using a Servo-U ventilator.
RESULTS: In the animal study, there were more pronounced decreases in Edi, reduced Pes swings and reduced PaCO2 at comparable flows during sHFNC compared to cHFNC both pre and post-ALI (p < .05). Baseline (pre-inspiratory) Ptr was 2-7 cmH2O greater during cHFNC (p < .05) indicating more dynamic hyperinflation. In one infant, the ventilator performed as expected, delivering Edi-synchronized high/low flow.
CONCLUSIONS: Synchronizing high flow unloaded breathing, decreased Edi, and reduced PaCO2 in an animal model and is feasible in infants.

BACKGROUND: Although cumulative studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, randomized trials to compare HFNC with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as initial treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure are limited. The aim of this randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial was to compare treatment failure rates between HFNC and NIV in such patients.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with AECOPD with a baseline arterial blood gas pH between 7.25 and 7.35 and PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg admitted to two intensive care units (ICUs) at a large tertiary academic teaching hospital between March 2018 and December 2022 were randomly assigned to HFNC or NIV. The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment failure, defined as endotracheal intubation or a switch to the other study treatment modality. Secondary endpoints were rates of intubation or treatment change, blood gas values, vital signs at one, 12, and 48 h, 28-day mortality, as well as ICU and hospital lengths of stay.
RESULTS: 225 total patients (113 in the HFNC group and 112 in the NIV group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The failure rate of the HFNC group was 25.7%, while the NIV group was 14.3%. The failure rate risk difference between the two groups was 11.38% (95% CI 0.25-21.20, P = 0.033), which was higher than the non-inferiority cut-off of 9%. In the per-protocol analysis, treatment failure occurred in 28 of 110 patients (25.5%) in the HFNC group and 15 of 109 patients (13.8%) in the NIV group (risk difference, 11.69%; 95% CI 0.48-22.60). The intubation rate in the HFNC group was higher than in the NIV group (14.2% vs 5.4%, P = 0.026). The treatment switch rate, ICU and hospital length of stay or 28-day mortality in the HFNC group were not statistically different from the NIV group (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: HFNC was not shown to be non-inferior to NIV and resulted in a higher incidence of treatment failure than NIV when used as the initial respiratory support for AECOPD patients with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure.
BACKGROUND: chictr.org (ChiCTR1800014553). Registered 21 January 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn.

OBJECTIVE: The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is gaining popularity for the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF). However, limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of HFNC for hypoxemic ARF in patients with blunt chest trauma (BCT).
METHODS: This retrospective analysis focused on BCT patients with mild-moderate hypoxemic ARF who were treated with either HFNC or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the emergency medicine department from January 2021 to December 2022. The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as either invasive ventilation, or a switch to the other study treatment (NIV for patients in the NFNC group, and vice-versa).
RESULTS: A total of 157 patients with BCT (72 in the HFNC group and 85 in the NIV group) were included in this study. The treatment failure rate in the HFNC group was 11.1% and 16.5% in the NIV group - risk difference of 5.36% (95% CI, -5.94-16.10%; P = 0.366). The most common cause of failure in the HFNC group was aggravation of respiratory distress. While in the NIV group, the most common reason for failure was treatment intolerance. Treatment intolerance in the HFNC group was significantly lower than that in the NIV group (1.4% vs 9.4%, 95% CI 0.40-16.18; P = 0.039). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that chronic respiratory disease, abbreviated injury scale score (chest) (≥3), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (≥15), partial arterial oxygen tension /fraction of inspired oxygen (≤200) at 1 h of treatment and respiratory rate (≥32 /min) at 1 h of treatment were risk factors associated with HFNC failure.
CONCLUSIONS: In BCT patients with mild-moderate hypoxemic ARF, the usage of HFNC did not lead to higher rate of treatment failure when compared to NIV. HFNC was found to offer better comfort and tolerance than NIV, suggesting it may be a promising new respiratory support therapy for BCT patients with mild-moderate ARF.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of a risk prediction model guided by the ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragm thickening fraction (RR/DTF) for noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition timing in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), through ultrasound evaluation of diaphragm movement indicators.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients diagnosed with AECOPD and undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV), who were admitted to the department of critical care medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University from January 2022 to July 2023 were enrolled. They were divided into NIV successful group and NIV failure group based on the outcome of NIV within 24 hours. Clinical indicators such as RR/DTF, diaphragmatic excursion (DE), tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), pH value, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and sputum excretion disorder were compared between the two groups after 2 hours of NIV. The factors influencing NIV failure were included in binary Logistic regression analysis, and an RR/DTF oriented risk prediction model was established. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) analysis was used to assess the predictive value of this model for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.
RESULTS: Among 64 patients with AECOPD, with 43 in the NIV successful group and 21 in the NIV failure group. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), oxygenation index (P/F), smoking history, and acute physiological and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) between the two groups of patients, indicating comparability. Compared to the NIV successful group, the NIV failure group showed a significantly increase in RR/DTF, RR, PaCO2, and sputum retention, while VT and DE were significantly decreased [RR/DTF (%): 1.00±0.18 vs. 0.89±0.22, RR (bpm): 21.64±3.13 vs. 19.62±2.98, PaCO2 (mmHg, 1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 70.82±8.82 vs. 65.29±9.47, sputum retention: 57.1% vs. 30.2%, VT (mL): 308.09±14.89 vs. 324.48±23.82, DE (mm): 19.91±2.94 vs. 22.05±3.30, all P < 0.05]. Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that RR/DTF [odds ratio (OR) = 147.989, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 3.321-595.412, P = 0.010], RR (OR = 1.296, 95%CI was 1.006-1.670, P = 0.045), VT (OR = 0.966, 95%CI was 0.935-0.999, P = 0.044), PaCO2 (OR = 1.086, 95%CI was 1.006~1.173, P = 0.035), and sputum retention (OR = 4.533, 95%CI was 1.025-20.049, P = 0.046) were independent risk factors for predicting NIV failure in AECOPD patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.713 with a 95%CI of 0.587-0.839 (P = 0.005). The sensitivity was 72.73%, the specificity was 88.10%, the Youden index was 0.394, and the optimal cut-off value was 0.87.
CONCLUSIONS: The RR/DTF risk prediction model has good predictive value for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.

To investigate noninvasive pressure-strain loop (PSL) combined with two-dimensional speck tracking imaging and left ventricular pressure measurement in the evaluation of cardiac function changes in anemia of prematurity (AOP) with different modes of respiratory support, and to explore its value in detecting subclinical myocardial injury in preterm infants. This retrospective study included 79 preterm infants with anemia, according to different modes of respiratory support, who were divided into invasive respiratory support group (39 cases) and noninvasive respiratory support group (40 cases). A control group of 40 nonanemic preterm infants with matched age, sex, and gestational age were also included. Complete echocardiography was performed for each included infant. There are PSL parameters that used to evaluate cardiac function, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE) among the three groups were compared. Compared with the control group, the value of GWI, GCW, and GWE were significantly lower and GWW was higher in the AOP groups (P < 0.05), and GWI, GCW and GWE were much significantly lower in the invasive respiratory support group than in the noninvasive respiratory support group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in GLS among the three groups (P > 0.05). Noninvasive PSL analysis can quantitatively assess myocardial work in AOP with different respiratory support, which is more sensitive than other conventional echocardiographic indices. This technique may provide a new method for monitoring subclinical myocardial injury with AOP.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) combined with severe type II respiratory failure have a high probability of ventilation failure using conventional non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of high intensity NPPV (HI-NPPV) for the treatment of AECOPD combined with severe type II respiratory failure.
METHODS: The data of patients with AECOPD combined with severe type II respiratory failure (blood gas analysis pH≤7.25) treated with NPPV in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from July 2013 to July 2023 were collected to conduct a retrospective case-control study. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the inspired positive airway pressure (IPAP) used during the NPPV treatment: a NPPV group (IPAP<20 cmH2O, 1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa) and a HI-NPPV group (20 cmH2O≤IPAP< 30 cmH2O). Ninety-nine and 95 patients were included in the NPPV group and the HI-NPPV group, respectively. A total of 86 pairs of data were matched using propensity score matching (PSM) for data matching. The primary outcome indexes (mortality and tracheal intubation rate) and secondary outcome indexes [blood gas analysis pH, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), adverse reaction rate, and length of hospitalization] were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The tracheal intubation rates of the NPPV group and the HI-NPPV group were 6.98% and 1.16%, respectively, and the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (χ2=4.32, P<0.05); the mortality of the NPPV group and the HI-NPPV group was 23.26% and 9.30%, respectively, and the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (χ2=11.64, P<0.01). The PaO2 at 24 h and 48 h after treatment of the HI-NPPV group was higher than that of the NPPV group, and the PaCO2 of the HI-NPPV group was lower than that of the NPPV group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The differences of pH at 24 h and 48 h after treatment between the 2 groups were not statistically significant (both P>0.05). The differences between the 2 groups in adverse reaction rate and hospitalization length were not statistically significant (both P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: HI-NPPV can reduce mortality and tracheal intubation rates by rapidly improving the ventilation of patients with AECOPD combined with severe type II respiratory failure. This study provides a new idea for the treatment of patients with AECOPD combined with severe type II respiratory failure.
目的: 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease，AECOPD)合并严重II型呼吸衰竭患者使用常规无创正压通气(non-invasive positive pressure ventilation，NPPV)通气失败的概率较高。本研究旨在探讨高压力NPPV(high intensity NPPV，HI-NPPV)治疗AECOPD合并严重II型呼吸衰竭的临床疗效。方法: 收集2013年7月至2023年7月因AECOPD伴严重II型呼吸衰竭(血气分析pH值≤7.25)在重庆医科大学附属第二医院进行NPPV治疗的患者资料，进行回顾性病例对照研究。根据NPPV治疗过程中采用的吸气相气道正压(inspired positive airway pressure，IPAP)将患者分为2组：NPPV组(IPAP<20 cmH2O，1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa)和HI-NPPV组(20 cmH2O≤IPAP<30 cmH2O)。NPPV组和HI-NPPV组分别纳入99和95例患者。通过倾向性得分匹配法(propensity score matching，PSM)进行数据配比，共匹配得到86对数据。比较2组的主要结局指标(病死率、气管插管率)及次要结局指标[血气分析的pH值、动脉血氧分压(arterial partial pressure of oxygen，PaO2)和动脉血二氧化碳分压(arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide，PaCO2)，不良反应率，住院时长]。结果: NPPV组和HI-NPPV组的气管插管率分别为6.98%和1.16%，2组之间差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.32，P<0.05)；NPPV组和HI-NPPV组的病死率分别为23.26%和9.30%，2组之间差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.64，P<0.01)。HI-NPPV组治疗后24、48 h的PaO2均高于NPPV组，PaCO2均低于NPPV组，差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)；治疗后24、48 h，2组之间pH值的差异无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。2组在不良反应率、住院时长方面的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论: HI-NPPV可通过迅速改善AECOPD合并严重II型呼吸衰竭患者的通气状态，从而降低病死率及插管率，本研究为AECOPD合并严重II型呼吸衰竭患者的治疗提供了新的思路。.