BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) represents a rare subtype of breast cancer, with limited prognostic factor studies available. The purpose of this research was to develop a unique nomogram for predicting MBC patient overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).
METHODS: From 2010 to 2020, clinical characteristics of male breast cancer patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Following univariate and multivariate analyses, nomograms for OS and BCSS were created. Kaplan-Meier plots were further generated to illustrate the relationship between independent risk variables and survival. The nomogram\'s ability to discriminate was measured by employing the area under a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curves. Additionally, when the nomogram was used to direct clinical practice, we also used decision curve analysis (DCA) to evaluate the clinical usefulness and net clinical benefits.
RESULTS: A total of 2143 patients were included in this research. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that age, grade, surgery, chemotherapy status, brain metastasis status, subtype, marital status, race, and AJCC-T, AJCC-N, and AJCC-M stages were significantly correlated with OS. Lung metastasis, age, marital status, grade, surgery, and AJCC-T, AJCC-N, and AJCC-M stages were significantly correlated with BCSS. By comprising these variables, a predictive nomogram was constructed in the SEER cohort. Then, it could be validated well in the validation cohort by receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) curve and calibration plot. Furthermore, the nomogram demonstrated better decision curve analysis (DCA) results, indicating the ability to forecast survival probability with greater accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: We created and validated a unique nomogram that can assist clinicians in identifying MBC patients at high risk and forecasting their OS/BCSS.

Male breast cancer is a rare disease, and it is important to have a high index of suspicion in patients presenting with breast symptoms, such as a breast mass or nipple discharge. Most male patients who are diagnosed with breast cancer present with breast complaints and/or a strong family history of cancer. Here, we will present a 47-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with bilateral ductal carcinoma in situ during a routine gynecomastia surgery after massive weight loss. This case demonstrates the importance of sending breast tissue specimens for pathology, especially in a male patient.

OBJECTIVE: Histological grading of tumours is a well-established biomarker used to guide treatment in female breast cancer. However, its significance in male breast cancer remains unclear. This systematic review investigates the prognostic significance of tumour grade in relation to breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in male breast cancer patients undergoing surgery.
METHODS: MEDLINE, PUBMED Central and EMBASE databases were searched to identify randomised trials and observational studies related to male breast neoplasms, tumour grading, recurrence, and survival.
RESULTS: A total of fifteen observational type studies were included in the review. A significant association between tumour grade and BCSS was reported in a majority of studies. This association was most evident with regard to high-grade (grade III) compared to low grade (grade I) tumours, with a significant relationship in 4 out of 4 studies. For intermediate-grade II tumours an association was demonstrated in a minority of studies.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms an association between high-grade male breast cancers and poorer disease-specific survival, however, the significance of intermediate-grade tumours remains unclear. Further research is required to investigate the biology of male breast cancer in relation to histological grade and optimally define intermediate-grade disease.

Male breast cancer (MBC), one of the rare types of cancer among men where the global incidence rate is 1.8% of all breast cancers cases with a yearly increase in a pace of 1.1%. Since the last 10 years, the incidence has been increased from 7.2% to 10.3% and the mortality rate was decreased from 11% to 3.8%. Nevertheless, the rate of diagnoses has been expected to be around 2.6% in the near future, still there is a great lack in studies to characterize the MBC including the developed countries. Based on our search, it is evidenced from the literature that the number of risk factors for the cause of MBC are significant, which includes the increase in age, family genetic history, mutations in specific genes due to various environmental impacts, hormonal imbalance and unregulated expression receptors for specific hormones of high levels of estrogen or androgen receptors compared to females. MBCs are broadly classified into ductal and lobular carcinomas with further sub-types, with some of the symptoms including a lump or swelling in the breast, redness of flaky skin in the breast, irritation and nipple discharge that is similar to the female breast cancer (FBC). The most common diagnostic tools currently in use are the ultrasound guided sonography, mammography, and biopsies. Treatment modalities for MBC include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapies. However, the guidelines followed for the diagnosis and treatment modalities of MBC are mostly based on FBC that is due to the lack of prospective studies related to MBC. However, there are distinct clinical and molecular features of MBC, it is a need to develop different clinical methods with more multinational approaches to help oncologist to improve care for MBC patients.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer is rare and accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancer cases worldwide.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients of invasive male breast cancer treated with curative intent by a trimodality approach via a multidisciplinary team at an academic university hospital in India between 2009 and 2023. Records were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathological parameters, treatment details and survival were recorded and analysed.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included. The median (IQR) age was 55(44-63) years. Most patients were overall stage III (74%) and node positive (79%) with Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade II (50%). Twenty-five patients (73%) were oestrogen receptor (ER) positive. Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and perineural invasion (PNI) were present in 62% and 21% of patients, respectively. The most common chemotherapy timing was adjuvant (53%) followed by neoadjuvant (41%), and the most commonly used regimen consisted of a combination of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane (53%). Most (85%) patients underwent a mastectomy, five patients underwent breast conservation. All patients received radiotherapy to a dose of 42.6 Gy in 16 fractions, followed by a tumour bed boost for those undergoing breast conservation. At a median follow-up of 70 months (range 10-159 months), the five and ten-year overall survival was 91% and 58%, and the five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 67%. The median DFS was 72 months. On univariate analysis, the tumour sub-type (Luminal versus TNBC) significantly predicted DFS (P = 0.03 log-rank).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer in males has a high incidence of node positivity, ER positivity and LVSI. Even with advanced stages at presentation, trimodality therapy in a multidisciplinary setting offers good long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) can improve quality of life for men with hypogonadism. However, it is generally avoided in patients with a history of prostate cancer or breast cancer as there is uncertainty about risks. This case illustrates an example of synchronous metastatic prostate cancer and male breast cancer following TRT.
METHODS: A 72-year-old man with previously treated intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma experienced a gradual rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) while self-administering testosterone replacement. He was later found to have recurrent metastatic prostate cancer and prior to initiating androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), he was also diagnosed with male breast cancer. His treatment has consisted of continued ADT for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) as well as surgical resection of his breast cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: ADT plays a role in treatment of male breast cancer and prostate cancer. TRT remains relatively contraindicated in patients with a history of these malignancies, but the evidence supporting this recommendation is somewhat limited.
CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the potential risk for synchronous recurrent prostate and new male breast cancer following TRT. Further studies are needed to better elucidate the increased risks of these malignancies with TRT.

BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely® (CW) campaign recommended de-implementation of surgical management of axillary nodes in specified patients. This study aimed to assess trends in the application of CW guidelines for lymph node (LN) surgery in males with breast cancer.
METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for males diagnosed with breast cancer from 2017 to 2020. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on CW criteria. Cohort 1 included all T1-2, clinically node-negative patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy and with ≤ 2 positive nodes, and Cohort 2 included all T1-2, node-negative, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients aged ≥ 70 years. In Cohort 1, patients who underwent sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB) alone were compared with axillary LN dissection (ALND) or no LN surgery, while in Cohort 2, patients who underwent LN surgery were compared with those with no LN surgery.
RESULTS: Of 617 patients who met the criteria for Cohort 1, 73.1% underwent SLNB alone compared with ALND (11.8%) or no LN surgery (15.1%). Those who received SLNB alone were younger (65 vs. 68 vs. 73 years; p < 0.001). The annual proportion of males who underwent SLNB alone remained stable from 2017 to 2020. Overall, 1565 patients met the criteria for Cohort 2, and 84.9% received LN surgery. LN surgery was omitted in older patients (81 vs. 77; p < 0.001). The proportion of elderly males with early-stage breast cancer who underwent LN surgery increased from 2017 to 2020.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that CW recommendations are not being routinely applied to males. These findings reinforce the need for additional studies and subsequent recommendations for optimal application of axillary surgery de-implementation for males diagnosed with breast cancer.

UNASSIGNED: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare condition, and recent research has underscored notable distinctions between MBC and breast cancer in women. This study aimed to assess and contrast the long-term survival outcomes and disease patterns of MBC patients with those of their female counterparts.
UNASSIGNED: We analyzed data from 113,845 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who had undergone curative surgery from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry (KBCR) between January 1990 and August 2014 in Seoul, Korea. The five-year overall survival was analyzed according to clinicopathological characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: Among 113,845 patients with breast cancer, 473 MBC cases were included. The median duration of follow-up was 72 months. The median age at diagnosis was 60 and 48 years for MBC and female breast cancer, respectively. Most male patients (92.6%) underwent total mastectomy, while 50.4% of female patients underwent breast-conserving surgery. Among MBC, 63.2% received chemotherapy, and 83.9% of hormone receptor-positive male patients received endocrine therapy. In survival analysis, MBC demonstrated distinct 5-year overall survival patterns compared with female breast cancer, according to age at diagnosis. In women with breast cancer, the younger age group (≤40 years) demonstrated worse 5-year overall survival than did the older age group (>40 years) (91.3% vs 92.7%, p <0.05). While in MBC, the younger age group (≤40 years) demonstrated better 5-year overall survival than did the older age group (>40 years) (97.4% vs 86.4%, p <0.05).
UNASSIGNED: In conclusion within this extensive cohort, we have revealed unique survival patterns in MBC that diverge from those observed in women with breast cancer. This study enhances our comprehension of MBC prognosis and can potentially shed light on unresolved questions, paving the way for future research in the realm of MBC.

UNASSIGNED: Although hereditary male neoplasms are quite rare, individuals harbouring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) may have a risk of developing tumours associated with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome, including male breast (MBC), prostate (PCa) and pancreatic (PC) cancers, and melanoma. Women and men showed a comparable genetic architecture of cancer susceptibility, but there are some gender-specific features. Since little is known about cancer genetic susceptibility in male population, our study was aimed at investigating the frequency of BRCA1/2 PVs in men with HBOC syndrome-associated tumors, in order to understand whether differences in gender may reflect in the prevalence and spectrum of germline alterations.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively collected and analysed clinical information of 352 HBOC-associated male cancer patients genetically tested for germline BRCA1/2 PVs by Next-Generation Sequencing analysis, enrolled, from February 2018 to January 2024, at the \"Regional Center for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of rare and heredo-familial tumors of adults\" of the University-Hospital Policlinico \"P. Giaccone\" of Palermo (Italy).
UNASSIGNED: Our investigation revealed that 7.4% of patients was carrier of a germline BRCA PV, with an almost total prevalence of BRCA2 alterations. In particular, 65.4% of BRCA-positive patients developed MBC, 19.2% had PC, 11.6% developed PCa, and only 3.8% had melanoma. Specifically, MBC individuals showed a BRCA-associated genetic predisposition in 17% of cases, whereas patients with PCa or PC exhibited a lower frequency of BRCA2 PVs, taking into account the current national criteria for access to germline genetic testing.
UNASSIGNED: Our study showed a high heterogeneity in prevalence of germline BRCA2 PVs among men which could reflect a potential gender-specific genetic heterogeneity. Therefore, BRCA-associated male tumours could be due to BRCA2 PVs different from those usually detected in women. In the event that it is demonstrated, in future, that male cancers are genetically distinct entities from those female this could improve personalized risk evaluation and guide therapeutic choices for patients of both sexes, in order to obtain a gender equality in cancer care.

This is a case report of a 76-year-old Filipino male who presented with a six-year history of a steadily growing left breast mass. The mass was eventually diagnosed to be Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, Anatomic and Prognostic Stage IIIB (T4b cN0 M0), Grade 3, Luminal A. Subsequently, the patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel, followed by modified radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection, concluded by post-mastectomy radiation therapy. The patient had complete clinical response to this trimodality therapy. The rarity of this case is juxtaposed and integrated with the present literature on male breast cancer.