未经证实:为了评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的乳头周OCT血管造影(OCTA)的可重复性,轻度认知障碍(MCI),帕金森病(PD),或正常认知。
未经评估:横截面。
未经证实:临床诊断为AD的患者,MCIPD,或正常认知成像。那些患有青光眼的人,糖尿病,玻璃体视网膜病理学,质量差的图像被排除在外。
UNASSIGNED:使用ZeissCirrusHD-OCT5000和AngioPlex(CarlZeissMeditec),每位参与者的每只合格眼睛在一次会议中接受2次OCTA4.5×4.5-mm乳头周扫描。Zeiss软件(v11.0.0.29946)量化了4个部门的放射状乳头状周围毛细血管(RPC)丛中的灌注测量(上级,鼻部,劣等,temporal).计算并报告了这些部门的平均值。
UNASSIGNED:使用2个参数对径向乳头状周围毛细血管丛灌注进行定量:毛细血管灌注密度(CPD)和毛细血管通量指数(CFI)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)来量化可重复性。对于包括双眼的受试者,每个扫描对的平均值用于评估CPD和CFI的眼间对称性.
未经批准:在374只眼睛中,46人来自患有AD的参与者,85人来自MCI患者,87人来自PD患者,156人来自认知正常的参与者.AD患者毛细血管灌注密度ICC=0.88(95%置信区间[CI],0.79-0.93),MCI=0.95(0.92-0.96),PD=0.91(0.87-0.94),对照=0.90(0.87-0.93)。AD中的毛细管通量指数ICC=0.82(0.70-0.90),MCI=0.87(0.80-0.91),PD=0.91(0.87-0.94),对照=0.85(0.79-0.89)。AD患者眼间平均CPD和CFI差异无统计学意义,MCI或PD(均P>0.05)。在AD中注意到孤立的眼间部门CPD差异(鼻腔,P=0.049;时间,P=0.024),PD(鼻部,P=0.036),和控制(鼻,P=0.016)。观察到MCI上半部分的CFI(P=0.028)和对照组的平均CFI(P=0.035)的眼间差异。
UNASSIGNED:AD的乳头周围OCTA可重复性,MCI和PD是良好的,与正常认知相似。乳头周围OCTA的眼间不对称性不明显,表明神经变性可能会均匀进行;未来的研究可能会揭示单眼成像的适当性。
UNASSIGNED: To assess the repeatability of peripapillary OCT angiography (OCTA) in those with Alzheimer disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Parkinson disease (PD), or normal cognition.
UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD, MCI, PD, or normal cognition were imaged. Those with glaucoma, diabetes mellitus, vitreoretinal pathology, and poor-quality images were excluded.
UNASSIGNED: Each eligible eye of each participant underwent 2 OCTA 4.5 × 4.5-mm peripapillary scans in a single session using a Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 with AngioPlex (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The Zeiss software (v11.0.0.29946) quantified measures of perfusion in the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) plexus in 4 sectors (superior, nasal, inferior, temporal). The average of these sectors was calculated and reported.
UNASSIGNED: Radial peripapillary capillary plexus perfusion was quantified using 2 parameters: capillary perfusion density (CPD) and capillary flux index (CFI). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to quantify repeatability. For subjects who had both eyes included, the average values of each scan pair were used to assess interocular symmetry of CPD and CFI.
UNASSIGNED: Of 374 eyes, 46 were from participants who had AD, 85 were from participants who had MCI, 87 were from participants who had PD, and 156 were from participants who had normal cognition. Capillary perfusion density ICC in AD = 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.93), MCI = 0.95 (0.92-0.96), PD = 0.91 (0.87-0.94), and controls = 0.90 (0.87-0.93). Capillary flux index ICC in AD = 0.82 (0.70-0.90), MCI = 0.87 (0.80-0.91), PD = 0.91 (0.87-0.94) and controls = 0.85 (0.79-0.89). There were no significant differences in interocular variation in average CPD and CFI in AD, MCI, or PD (all P > 0.05). Isolated interocular sectoral CPD differences were noted in AD (nasal, P = 0.049; temporal, P = 0.024), PD (nasal, P = 0.036), and controls (nasal, P = 0.016). Interocular differences in CFI in the superior sector in MCI (P = 0.028) and in average CFI for controls (P = 0.035) were observed.
UNASSIGNED: Peripapillary OCTA repeatability in AD, MCI, and PD is good-excellent and similar to those with normal cognition. Insignificant interocular asymmetry in peripapillary OCTA suggests neurodegeneration may proceed uniformly; future studies may reveal the appropriateness of single-eye imaging.