Life Support Care

生命支持护理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    道德困扰会对护士和护理团队产生重大影响。致力于关怀和同情原则的职业通常会受到患者的徒劳治疗。随着极端延长生命的措施的扩散,这些医疗模式的退出出现了困难。如果预后较差,并且护理被认为是治愈性的而不是姑息性的,提供者可能经常对他们的干预感到矛盾和痛苦。美国护理学院协会对使用与徒劳护理有关的不适当的生命支持治疗的增加表示越来越关注。令人信服的案例是,一名被殴打的69岁无家可归者因心脏骤停而心脏骤停,并在经历了未知的停机时间后被复苏,提供了此报告的上下文框架。道德冲突可能变得非常具有挑战性,这不可避免地增加了患者及其护理人员的痛苦。研究结果表明,医疗保健组织可以从制定过程中受益,这些过程使道德考虑成为日常临床实践的早期和常规部分。对道德冲突采取积极的方法可以改善患者的护理结果并减少道德困扰。
    Moral distress can impact nurses and the care team significantly. A profession dedicated to the principles of caring and compassion is often subjected to patients receiving futile treatment. With the proliferation of extreme life-prolonging measures come the difficulties in the withdrawal of those medical modalities. If a prognosis is poor and care is perceived as curative rather than palliative, providers may often feel conflicted and distressed by their interventions. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing has expressed growing concern about an increase in the use of inappropriate life-support treatments related to futile care. The compelling case of a severely beaten 69-year-old homeless man who had cardiac-arrested and was resuscitated after an unknown amount of down-time, provides the contextual framework for this report. Ethical conflicts can become very challenging, which inevitably increases the suffering of the patient and their caregivers. Research findings suggest that health care organizations can benefit from enacting processes that make ethical considerations an early and routine part of everyday clinical practice. A proactive approach to ethical conflicts may improve patient care outcomes and decrease moral distress.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    在ICU中退出维持生命治疗的决定很常见,但是关于如何退出治疗的信息很少。一项初步研究表明,即使在相同的情况下,医生也会以不同的方式撤回维持生命的治疗。这种变化可能会给ICU工作人员和亲属带来压力。我们的研究调查了在瑞典ICU工作的医生关于撤回两名虚构患者的生命维持治疗的决定。是否以及如何退出药物治疗存在差异,以及应如何撤销通气支持。经验不足的医生倾向于选择通过断奶来延长死亡过程,即使不清楚这对工作人员或亲戚来说是可取的。我们的研究可用于ICU的讨论中,以尝试了解个别医生如何做出退出维持生命治疗的决定。
    Decisions to withdraw life sustaining treatment in the ICU are common, but there is little information about how treatment should be withdrawn. A pilot study showed that doctors withdraw life sustaining treatment in different ways even in identical cases. This variation can cause stress for ICU staff and relatives.  Our study investigated the decisions of doctors working in ICUs in Sweden regarding the withdrawal of life sustaining treatment for two fictitious patients. There was variation in if and how drug treatments should be withdrawn, as well as how ventilatory support should be withdrawn. Less experienced doctors tended to choose to prolong the dying process by weaning, even if it is unclear if that is preferable for the staff or for relatives.  Our study could be used in discussions in ICUs to try to understand how individual doctors make decisions about withdrawing life sustaining treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者自治权法案(PRAA),2019年在台湾实施,通过提前护理计划(ACP)实现提前决策(AD)。该法律框架允许在不可逆昏迷的情况下扣留和撤回维持生命的治疗(LST)或人工营养和水合(ANH),植物人状态,严重的痴呆,或难以忍受的疼痛。本研究旨在调查不同临床状况对LST或ANH的偏好,参与者偏好的变化,以及影响城市居民这些偏好的因素。
    方法:采用合法结构化AD文档的调查和数据收集的便利抽样,个人从台北市医院招募,自PRAA成立以来,作为ACP在台湾的主要试验和示范设施。该研究检查了广告和ACP咨询记录,记录性别,年龄,福利权利,疾病状况,家庭护理经验,ACP咨询的地点,二级亲属的参与,以及参加ACP的意向。
    结果:从电子记录中提取2337名参与者的数据。拒绝LST和ANH的意愿高度一致,在晚期疾病和极度严重的痴呆症之间存在显着差异。此外,ANH被广泛接受为限时治疗,并且有一种普遍的趋势是授权卫生保健代理(HCA)代表参与者做出决定。观察到性别差异,女性更倾向于拒绝LST和ANH,而男性倾向于接受全面或有时间限制的治疗。年龄也起了作用,年轻的参与者对治疗和授权HCA更加开放,年龄较大的参与者更容易拒绝。
    结论:LST和ANH的不同偏好是由公众当前对不同临床状态的理解决定的,性别,年龄,和文化因素。我们的研究揭示了细微差别的临终偏好,不断发展的广告,和社会人口影响。进一步的研究可以探索随时间变化的偏好以及医疗保健专业人员对神经系统患者LST和ANH决策的看法。.
    BACKGROUND: The Patient Right to Autonomy Act (PRAA), implemented in Taiwan in 2019, enables the creation of advance decisions (AD) through advance care planning (ACP). This legal framework allows for the withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (LST) or artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in situations like irreversible coma, vegetative state, severe dementia, or unbearable pain. This study aims to investigate preferences for LST or ANH across various clinical conditions, variations in participant preferences, and factors influencing these preferences among urban residents.
    METHODS: Employing a survey of legally structured AD documents and convenience sampling for data collection, individuals were enlisted from Taipei City Hospital, serving as the primary trial and demonstration facility for ACP in Taiwan since the commencement of the PRAA in its inaugural year. The study examined ADs and ACP consultation records, documenting gender, age, welfare entitlement, disease conditions, family caregiving experience, location of ACP consultation, participation of second-degree relatives, and the intention to participate in ACP.
    RESULTS: Data from 2337 participants were extracted from electronic records. There was high consistency in the willingness to refuse LST and ANH, with significant differences noted between terminal diseases and extremely severe dementia. Additionally, ANH was widely accepted as a time-limited treatment, and there was a prevalent trend of authorizing a health care agent (HCA) to make decisions on behalf of participants. Gender differences were observed, with females more inclined to decline LST and ANH, while males tended towards accepting full or time-limited treatment. Age also played a role, with younger participants more open to treatment and authorizing HCA, and older participants more prone to refusal.
    CONCLUSIONS: Diverse preferences in LST and ANH were shaped by the public\'s current understanding of different clinical states, gender, age, and cultural factors. Our study reveals nuanced end-of-life preferences, evolving ADs, and socio-demographic influences. Further research could explore evolving preferences over time and healthcare professionals\' perspectives on LST and ANH decisions for neurological patients..
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)可降低死亡率。of.医院心脏骤停.执行CPR(W-CPR)的意愿也至关重要。据报道,2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对W-CPR的影响不确定。我们的目标是在COVID-19大流行期间检查W-CPR,包括旁观者-受害者关系的影响,旁观者的特点,以及外行人和医疗保健提供者(HCP)的W-CPR的CPR背景。
    在2020年8月至2020年11月期间,对泰国外行人和HCP进行了一项横断面在线调查。作为在线调查,向志愿者提供了结构化问卷。我们记录了W-常规CPR(W-C-CPR),W-压缩。只有CPR(W-CO-CPR),胸部按压,自动体外除颤器(AED),嘴。to.嘴,面罩,和家庭成员的袖珍面罩通风(FM),熟人,和陌生人在研究期间(大流行)和非大流行的情况下进行分析。
    我们包括419名外行人和716名HCPs。大流行期间,除了FM中的W-CO-CPR和FM和熟人中的AED外,外行人在所有干预措施中表达的意愿较低(P<0.05)。HCPs不愿意进行任何干预(P<0.05)。外行在FMs和熟人之间表现出相当的W-C-CPR和W-CO-CPR,但在陌生人中表现较少(P<0.05)。HCP\'W-CPR根据它们的关系而显着不同(P<0.05),除了FM和熟人之间的W-CO-CPR。自我CPR功效,单身婚姻状况,CPR经验,HCP在FM中报告了更高的W-CO-CPR。
    在COVID-19大流行期间,所有接受者的W-CPR较少(外行人:2.8%-21.0%,HCP:7.6%-31.2%),除了有FM的外行人。接受者的关系在W-C-CPR中比在W-CO-CPR中更重要,特别是在HCPs中。
    UNASSIGNED: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) reduces mortality from out.of.hospital cardiac arrest. The willingness to perform CPR (W-CPR) is also critical. Uncertain effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on W-CPR were reported. Our objectives aim to examine W-CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the influence of the bystander-victim relationship, bystander characteristics, and CPR background on the W-CPR of laypeople and healthcare providers (HCPs).
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between August 2020 and November 2020 among Thai laypeople and HCPs. A structured questionnaire was given to volunteers as an online survey. We recorded W-Conventional CPR (W-C-CPR), W-Compression.only CPR (W-CO-CPR), chest compression, automated external defibrillator (AED), mouth.to.mouth, face shield, and pocket mask ventilation on family members (FMs), acquaintances, and strangers during the study (pandemic) and in nonpandemic situation and analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 419 laypeople and 716 HCPs. During the pandemic, laypeople expressed less willingness in all interventions (P < 0.05) except W-CO-CPR in FMs and AED in FMs and acquaintances. HCPs were less willing to any interventions (P < 0.05). Laypeople showed comparable W-C-CPR and W-CO-CPR between FMs and acquaintances but less among strangers (P < 0.05). HCPs\' W-CPR differed significantly depending on their relationship (P < 0.05), except W-CO-CPR between FMs and acquaintances. CPR self.efficacy, single marital status, CPR experience, and HCPs reported higher W-CO-CPR in FMs.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants were less W-CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic on all recipients (laypeople: 2.8%-21.0%, HCPs: 7.6%-31.2%), except for laypeople with FMs. The recipient\'s relationship was more critical in W-C-CPR than in W-CO-CPR, especially in HCPs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗保健专业人员的经验和自信心在减少紧急情况下的焦虑水平方面发挥着关键作用。重要的是要认识到焦虑对表现的潜在影响。加强处理紧急情况的准备和信心,医疗保健专业人员受益于定期培训和模拟。此外,反复暴露于紧急情况可以帮助调节生理反应。有效管理焦虑是关键,与焦虑相关的交感神经刺激会对表现产生不利影响。本研究旨在调查护士自我评估的管理急诊指南的能力及其在重症监护环境中执行任务的自信心。向1097名护士提供了问卷。我们比较了经验丰富的护士(EN)和新注册护士(NLN)在管理急诊科轮班或重症患者方面的自信心,并发现EN在这些情况下更有信心。在参加模拟课程的受试者中也观察到了这种现象,尽管他们的比例仍然很低。大多数NLN感到足够准备在中等强度的病房中工作。参加高级培训课程可以增强护士的自信心,并可以改善患者的安全管理。,改善患者康复,尽量减少错误。参加课程可以提高护士在不同情况下的自主性。
    The experience and self-confidence of healthcare professionals play critical roles in reducing anxiety levels during emergencies. It is important to recognize the potential impact of anxiety on performance. To enhance preparedness and confidence in managing emergencies, healthcare professionals benefit from regular training and simulations. Additionally, repeated exposure to emergency scenarios can help modulate physiological responses. Managing anxiety effectively is key, as heightened sympathetic stimulation associated with anxiety can adversely affect performance. This study aimed to investigate nurses\' self-assessed ability to manage emergency guidelines and their self-confidence in performing tasks in critical care settings. A questionnaire was provided to 1097 nurses. We compared the self-confidence of experienced nurses (ENs) and newly licensed nurses (NLNs) in managing emergency department shifts or critical patients, and found that ENs are more confident in these scenarios. This phenomenon was also observed in subjects who had taken simulation courses, although they were still a low percentage. Most NLNs feel sufficiently ready to work in medium-intensity wards. Attending advanced training courses enhances nurses\' self-confidence and may improve patient safety management., improving patient recovery, and minimizing errors. Attending courses improves the perception of autonomy of nurses in different scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于不良的神经系统预后,心脏骤停的昏迷幸存者可能在停止维持生命的治疗(WLST)后死亡。家庭成员,作为代理决策者,经常被要求决定患者是否应继续接受持续的生命维持治疗,例如在移除后死亡风险的背景下进行机械通气。有时候,医生和家庭成员不同意什么是病人的最大利益,这场冲突给家庭和医务人员带来了痛苦。本文研究了哥伦比亚大学医学中心(CUMC)24名心脏骤停患者的医疗记录中记录的主题,尽管医生建议退出,但他们的家人还是选择了继续维持生命。在病人家属和他们的提供者之间记录在案的对话中,最突出的主题包括对奇迹的信仰,扮演上帝的不恰当,“与病人有更多时间的价值,以及提供者和家庭成员如何感知患者状态的差异。
    Comatose survivors of cardiac arrest may die following withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) due to poor neurologic prognosis. Family members, acting as surrogate decision makers, are frequently asked to decide whether the patient should continue to receive ongoing life-sustaining therapy such as mechanical ventilation in this context of risk of death following removal. Sometimes, physicians and family members disagree about what is in the patient\'s best interest, and this conflict causes distress for both families and medical personnel.This article examines themes recorded in the medical records of 24 cardiac arrest patients at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) whose families chose to pursue continued life support despite physician recommendations for withdrawal. In documented conversations between patients\' families and their providers, the most prominent themes included faith in miracles, the inappropriateness of \"playing God,\" the value of more time with the patient, and differences in how providers and family members perceived the patient\'s status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管是美国增长最快的种族之一,在住院环境中如何表达和制定华裔美国人的治疗偏好存在差距。
    目的:比较美籍华人和美国白人ICU患者提前护理记录和维持生命治疗的比率。
    方法:在这项配对的回顾性死者队列研究中,我们在位于唐人街附近的三级医疗中心中包括了四个ICU。华裔美国人队列包括ICU晚期入院期间的成年患者,主要语言为中文(普通话,粤语,泰山人)。美国白人队列是根据年龄匹配的,性别,死亡的一年,承认诊断。
    结果:我们在每个队列中确定了154名死者。尽管入院时的赔率相似,在ICU晚期入院期间,华裔美国人完成DNR(OR1.82;95CI0.99-3.40)和DNI完成(OR1.81;95CI,1.07-1.57)的几率更高。尽管美籍华人有相似的插管几率(aOR0.90;95CI,0.55-1.48),插管后签署DNI的比例更高(41%vs25%)。美籍华人死者的CPR几率也较高(aOR2.03;95CI,1.03-41.6),尽管签署了DNR命令,但三名美籍华人死者仍接受CPR(12%对0%)。
    结论:在终端ICU入院期间,美籍华人死者比美国白人死者更有可能完成预先护理文件并接受CPR。气管插管后,华裔美国人的代码状态变化更为常见。需要进一步的研究来了解这些差异并确定目标一致护理的机会。
    BACKGROUND: Despite being one of the fastest growing ethnic groups in the U.S., there exists a gap in how treatment preferences among Chinese Americans are expressed and enacted upon in inpatient settings.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of advance care documentation and life-sustaining treatment between Chinese American and White American ICU decedents.
    METHODS: In this matched retrospective decedent cohort study, we included four ICUs within a tertiary medical center located in a Chinatown neighborhood. The Chinese American cohort included adult patients during the terminal admission in the ICU with primary language identified as Chinese (Mandarin, Cantonese, Taishanese). The White American cohort was matched according to age, sex, year of death, and admitting diagnosis.
    RESULTS: We identified 154 decedents in each cohort. Despite similar odds on admission, Chinese American decedents had higher odds of DNR completion (OR 1.82; 95%CI 0.99-3.40) and DNI completion (OR 1.81; 95%CI, 1.07-1.57) during the terminal ICU admission. Although Chinese American decedents had similar odds of intubation (aOR 0.90; 95%CI, 0.55-1.48), a higher proportion signed a DNI after intubation (41% vs 25%). Chinese American decedents also had higher odds of CPR (aOR 2.03; 95%CI, 1.03-41.6) with three Chinese American decedents receiving CPR despite a signed DNR order (12% vs 0%).
    CONCLUSIONS: During terminal ICU admissions, Chinese American decedents were more likely to complete advance care documentation and to receive CPR than White American decedents. Changes in code status were more common for Chinese Americans after intubation. Further research is needed to understand these differences and identify opportunities for goal-concordant care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在重症监护病房(ICU)中,维持生命疗法(LLST)的局限性很常见,但是以前没有研究检查南非(SA)的临终(EOL)护理和LLST。
    方法:本研究从前瞻性,国际,多中心,观察性研究(Ethicus-2),并与世界其他国家的实践进行比较。
    结果:LLST在SA中相对常见,并且扣留比撤回治疗更频繁。然而,停药和停药治疗不太常见,虽然心肺复苏失败更常见,比其他许多国家都多。没有患者有预先指示。SA中LLST的主要原因是生活质量差,多系统器官衰竭和患者对最大治疗无反应。EOL决策的主要考虑因素是良好的医疗实践和患者的最佳利益,很少考虑需要ICU病床。
    结论:在SA和全球范围内,扣留治疗比撤回治疗更常见,尽管与世界平均水平相比,两者在SA中的频率明显较低。
    OBJECTIVE: Limitations of life sustaining therapies (LLST) are frequent in intensive care units (ICUs), but no previous studies have examined end-of-life (EOL) care and LLST in South Africa (SA).
    METHODS: This study evaluated LLST in SA from the data of a prospective, international, multicentre, observational study (Ethicus-2) and compared practices with countries in the rest of the world.
    RESULTS: LLST was relatively common in SA, and withholding was more frequent than withdrawing therapy. However, withdrawing and withholding therapy were less common, while failed CPR was more common, than in many other countries. No patients had an advance directive. Primary reasons for LLST in SA were poor quality of life, multisystem organ failure and patients\' unresponsiveness to maximal therapy. Primary considerations for EOL decision-making were good medical practice and patients\' best-interest, with the need for an ICU bed only rarely considered.
    CONCLUSIONS: Withholding was more common than withdrawing treatment both in SA and worldwide, although both were significantly less frequent in SA compared with the world average.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号