PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) reduces mortality from out.of.hospital cardiac arrest. The willingness to perform CPR (W-CPR) is also critical. Uncertain effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on W-CPR were reported. Our objectives aim to examine W-CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the influence of the bystander-victim relationship, bystander characteristics, and CPR background on the W-CPR of laypeople and healthcare providers (HCPs).
UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between August 2020 and November 2020 among Thai laypeople and HCPs. A structured questionnaire was given to volunteers as an online survey. We recorded W-Conventional CPR (W-C-CPR), W-Compression.only CPR (W-CO-CPR), chest compression, automated external defibrillator (AED), mouth.to.mouth, face shield, and pocket mask ventilation on family members (FMs), acquaintances, and strangers during the study (pandemic) and in nonpandemic situation and analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: We included 419 laypeople and 716 HCPs. During the pandemic, laypeople expressed less willingness in all interventions (P < 0.05) except W-CO-CPR in FMs and AED in FMs and acquaintances. HCPs were less willing to any interventions (P < 0.05). Laypeople showed comparable W-C-CPR and W-CO-CPR between FMs and acquaintances but less among strangers (P < 0.05). HCPs\' W-CPR differed significantly depending on their relationship (P < 0.05), except W-CO-CPR between FMs and acquaintances. CPR self.efficacy, single marital status, CPR experience, and HCPs reported higher W-CO-CPR in FMs.
UNASSIGNED: Participants were less W-CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic on all recipients (laypeople: 2.8%-21.0%, HCPs: 7.6%-31.2%), except for laypeople with FMs. The recipient\'s relationship was more critical in W-C-CPR than in W-CO-CPR, especially in HCPs.
UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between August 2020 and November 2020 among Thai laypeople and HCPs. A structured questionnaire was given to volunteers as an online survey. We recorded W-Conventional CPR (W-C-CPR), W-Compression.only CPR (W-CO-CPR), chest compression, automated external defibrillator (AED), mouth.to.mouth, face shield, and pocket mask ventilation on family members (FMs), acquaintances, and strangers during the study (pandemic) and in nonpandemic situation and analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: We included 419 laypeople and 716 HCPs. During the pandemic, laypeople expressed less willingness in all interventions (P < 0.05) except W-CO-CPR in FMs and AED in FMs and acquaintances. HCPs were less willing to any interventions (P < 0.05). Laypeople showed comparable W-C-CPR and W-CO-CPR between FMs and acquaintances but less among strangers (P < 0.05). HCPs\' W-CPR differed significantly depending on their relationship (P < 0.05), except W-CO-CPR between FMs and acquaintances. CPR self.efficacy, single marital status, CPR experience, and HCPs reported higher W-CO-CPR in FMs.
UNASSIGNED: Participants were less W-CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic on all recipients (laypeople: 2.8%-21.0%, HCPs: 7.6%-31.2%), except for laypeople with FMs. The recipient\'s relationship was more critical in W-C-CPR than in W-CO-CPR, especially in HCPs.
摘要：
■旁观者心肺复苏（CPR）可降低死亡率。of.医院心脏骤停.执行CPR(W-CPR)的意愿也至关重要。据报道，2019年冠状病毒病（COVID-19）大流行对W-CPR的影响不确定。我们的目标是在COVID-19大流行期间检查W-CPR，包括旁观者-受害者关系的影响，旁观者的特点，以及外行人和医疗保健提供者（HCP）的W-CPR的CPR背景。
■在2020年8月至2020年11月期间，对泰国外行人和HCP进行了一项横断面在线调查。作为在线调查，向志愿者提供了结构化问卷。我们记录了W-常规CPR（W-C-CPR），W-压缩。只有CPR（W-CO-CPR），胸部按压,自动体外除颤器（AED），嘴。to.嘴，面罩,和家庭成员的袖珍面罩通风(FM)，熟人,和陌生人在研究期间(大流行)和非大流行的情况下进行分析。
■我们包括419名外行人和716名HCPs。大流行期间,除了FM中的W-CO-CPR和FM和熟人中的AED外，外行人在所有干预措施中表达的意愿较低（P<0.05）。HCPs不愿意进行任何干预（P<0.05）。外行在FMs和熟人之间表现出相当的W-C-CPR和W-CO-CPR，但在陌生人中表现较少（P<0.05）。HCP\'W-CPR根据它们的关系而显着不同（P<0.05），除了FM和熟人之间的W-CO-CPR。自我CPR功效,单身婚姻状况,CPR经验,HCP在FM中报告了更高的W-CO-CPR。
■在COVID-19大流行期间，所有接受者的W-CPR较少(外行人：2.8%-21.0%，HCP：7.6%-31.2%），除了有FM的外行人。接受者的关系在W-C-CPR中比在W-CO-CPR中更重要，特别是在HCPs中。
■在2020年8月至2020年11月期间，对泰国外行人和HCP进行了一项横断面在线调查。作为在线调查，向志愿者提供了结构化问卷。我们记录了W-常规CPR（W-C-CPR），W-压缩。只有CPR（W-CO-CPR），胸部按压,自动体外除颤器（AED），嘴。to.嘴，面罩,和家庭成员的袖珍面罩通风(FM)，熟人,和陌生人在研究期间(大流行)和非大流行的情况下进行分析。
■我们包括419名外行人和716名HCPs。大流行期间,除了FM中的W-CO-CPR和FM和熟人中的AED外，外行人在所有干预措施中表达的意愿较低（P<0.05）。HCPs不愿意进行任何干预（P<0.05）。外行在FMs和熟人之间表现出相当的W-C-CPR和W-CO-CPR，但在陌生人中表现较少（P<0.05）。HCP\'W-CPR根据它们的关系而显着不同（P<0.05），除了FM和熟人之间的W-CO-CPR。自我CPR功效,单身婚姻状况,CPR经验,HCP在FM中报告了更高的W-CO-CPR。
■在COVID-19大流行期间，所有接受者的W-CPR较少(外行人：2.8%-21.0%，HCP：7.6%-31.2%），除了有FM的外行人。接受者的关系在W-C-CPR中比在W-CO-CPR中更重要，特别是在HCPs中。
