Left ventricular volume

左心室容积
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:冠状动脉钙(CAC)扫描包含的有用信息超出了目前未报告的AgatstonCAC评分。我们最近报道了在CAC扫描中启用人工智能(AI)的心腔容积(AI-CAC™)预测了多种族动脉粥样硬化研究(MESA)中的房颤事件。在这项研究中,我们调查了AI-CAC心腔在预测心力衰竭(HF)中的表现.
    方法:我们将AI-CAC应用于无症状个体的5750个CAC扫描(52%为女性,白色40%,黑色26%,西班牙裔22%中国12%)在MESA基线检查(2000-2002)中没有已知的心血管疾病。我们使用了15年的结果数据,并比较了AI-CAC容量与NT-proBNP的时间依赖性曲线下面积(AUC)。Agatston得分,和9个已知的临床危险因素(年龄,性别,糖尿病,目前吸烟,高血压药物,收缩压和舒张压,LDL,HDL用于预测15年以上的HF事件。
    结果:经过15年的随访,产生256个高频事件。使用AI-CAC预测HF的15年时间依赖性AUC[95%CI]所有腔室容量(0.86[0.82,0.91])显着高于NT-proBNP(0.74[0.69,0.77])和Agatston评分(0.71[0.68,0.78])(p<0.0001)。与临床危险因素相当(0.85,p=0.4141)。无类别净重新分类指数(NRI)[95%CI]添加AI-CACLV对临床危险因素(0.32[0.16,0.41])有显著改善,NT-proBNP(0.46[0.33,0.58]),和Agatston评分(0.71[0.57,0.81])用于15年的HF预测(p<0.0001)。
    结论:AI-CAC容量显着优于NT-proBNP和AgatstonCAC评分,并显著提高了临床危险因素预测HF事件的AUC和无类别NRI。
    BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scans contain useful information beyond the Agatston CAC score that is not currently reported. We recently reported that artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled cardiac chambers volumetry in CAC scans (AI-CAC™) predicted incident atrial fibrillation in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). In this study, we investigated the performance of AI-CAC cardiac chambers for prediction of incident heart failure (HF).
    METHODS: We applied AI-CAC to 5750 CAC scans of asymptomatic individuals (52% female, White 40%, Black 26%, Hispanic 22% Chinese 12%) free of known cardiovascular disease at the MESA baseline examination (2000-2002). We used the 15-year outcomes data and compared the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of AI-CAC volumetry versus NT-proBNP, Agatston score, and 9 known clinical risk factors (age, gender, diabetes, current smoking, hypertension medication, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, LDL, HDL for predicting incident HF over 15 years.
    RESULTS: Over 15 years of follow-up, 256 HF events accrued. The time-dependent AUC [95% CI] at 15 years for predicting HF with AI-CAC all chambers volumetry (0.86 [0.82,0.91]) was significantly higher than NT-proBNP (0.74 [0.69, 0.77]) and Agatston score (0.71 [0.68, 0.78]) (p ​< ​0.0001), and comparable to clinical risk factors (0.85, p ​= ​0.4141). Category-free Net Reclassification Index (NRI) [95% CI] adding AI-CAC LV significantly improved on clinical risk factors (0.32 [0.16,0.41]), NT-proBNP (0.46 [0.33,0.58]), and Agatston score (0.71 [0.57,0.81]) for HF prediction at 15 years (p ​< ​0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: AI-CAC volumetry significantly outperformed NT-proBNP and the Agatston CAC score, and significantly improved the AUC and category-free NRI of clinical risk factors for incident HF prediction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对QRS持续时间(QRSd)>150毫秒(ms)的心力衰竭患者有效。然而,它的有益效果似乎是有限的那些“中档”QRSd(120-149ms)。最近的研究表明,将QRSd修改为左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV),修改后的QRSd,提高了对CRT临床结局的预测。
    目的:研究改良QRSd对“中程”QRSd患者CRT疗效的临床影响。
    方法:我们进行了回顾性研究,多中心,观察性研究,以CRT后心力衰竭住院(HFH)为主要终点。修改后的QRSd定义为QRSd除以LVEDV,通过Teichholtz超声心动图方法测定。
    结果:在考虑的506名连续患者中,119例患者(平均年龄:61±15岁,80%男性,QRSd:135±9ms)和“中档”QRSd,接受了从头CRT装置植入,用于分析。在878天的中位随访期间(四分位距:381-1663天),45例(37%)患者发生HFH。Fine-Gray分析显示改良QRSd是HFH的独立预测因子(风险比[HR]:0.97,95%置信区间[CI]:0.96-0.99,p<0.01)。接收器工作特征曲线分析显示,改良QRSd预测HFH的截止值为0.65ms/mL。与以下患者相比,上述患者的HFH发生率显着降低(HR:0.46,95%CI:0.25-0.86,p=0.01)。
    结论:改良QRSd可有效预测“中程”QRSd患者的CRT疗效。
    BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective for patients with heart failure with QRS duration (QRSd) ≥150 ms. However, its beneficial effect seems to be limited for those with \"mid-range\" QRSd (120-149 ms). Recent studies have demonstrated that modifying QRSd to left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV)-modified QRSd-improves the prediction of clinical outcomes of CRT.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of the modified QRSd on the efficacy of CRT in patients with \"mid-range\" QRSd.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study, with heart failure hospitalization (HFH) after CRT as the primary endpoint. Modified QRSd is defined as QRSd divided by LVEDV, determined through the Teichholtz method of echocardiography.
    RESULTS: Among the 506 consecutive patients considered, 119 (mean age 61 ± 15 years; 80% male, QRSd 135 ± 9 ms) with a \"mid-range\" QRSd who underwent de novo CRT device implantation were included for analysis. During median follow-up of 878 days [interquartile range 381-1663 days], HFH occurred in 45 patients (37%). Fine-Gray analysis revealed modified QRSd was an independent predictor of HFH (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.99; P <.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cutoff value of 0.65 ms/mL for the modified QRSd in predicting HFH. Patients above the threshold exhibited a significantly lower incidence of HFH than patients below the threshold (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25-0.86; P = .01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Modified QRSd can effectively predict the efficacy of CRT in patients with a \"mid-range\" QRSd.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:妊娠期间血液动力学负荷和心脏结构重塑增加,因为这些变化是生理必需的。母亲循环系统的适应可能引发或加重后代心血管疾病的发展。如果身体无法适应这些变化,它可能会发展心脏病,如心肌病。在健康的伊拉克妇女中,缺乏有关左心室(LV)体积和功能的妊娠晚期超声心动图数据。为了了解正常怀孕期间发生的心脏变化,需要一种评估心脏功能的精确工具.在这方面,四维超声心动图(4DE)技术显著提高了评估左心室大小和功能的质量和准确性.
    目的:本研究旨在使用4DE评估健康妊娠晚期的LV体积和功能,并将使用4DE评估LV的结果与使用常规二维(2D)超声心动图评估LV的结果进行比较。
    方法:本研究对75例健康孕妇(病例组)和75例非孕妇(对照组)进行了研究。参与者于2022年4月1日至2023年5月30日在Al-Fortat教学医院就诊,并对其进行了2D和4D超声心动图研究。
    结果:左心室舒张末期容积(EDV),收缩末期容积(ESV),与对照组相比,病例组和心输出量(CO)显着增加(90.87±18.03mlvs.62.64±14.11ml,P<0.001;35.59±6.52mlvs.22.42±5.82ml,P<0.001;4.87±1.27vs.3.35±0.87L/m,分别为P<0.001)。相比之下,与对照组相比,妊娠组的LV射血分数(LVEF)显着降低(60.37±5.42%vs.64.04±4.99%,P<0.01)。此外,研究表明,EDV存在显著差异,ESV,射血分数(EF%),2D和4D超声心动图之间的CO(P<0.001),根据BlandAltman的测试.
    结论:在妊娠晚期的健康孕妇中,前负荷指标(心室容积和CO)增加,EF%降低。4DE提供有关心脏容积和功能的详细图像和信息,允许早期发现怀孕期间可能出现的任何潜在问题,从而改善母亲和发育中的胎儿的健康结果。
    BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic load and heart structural remodeling rise during pregnancy because these changes are physiologically necessary. Adaptations in the mother\'s circulatory system may either initiate or aggravate the development of cardiovascular disease in the offspring. If the body is unable to adjust to these changes, it may develop heart conditions like cardiomyopathy. There is a lack of third-trimester echocardiographic data on left ventricular (LV) volume and function in healthy Iraqi women. To understand the cardiac alterations that occur during normal pregnancy, a precise tool that evaluates cardiac function is needed. In that regard, the four-dimensional echocardiography (4DE) technique has markedly improved the quality and accuracy of assessing the size and function of the left ventricle.
    OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess LV volume and function in the third trimester of a healthy pregnancy using 4DE and to compare the results of LV assessment using 4DE with those of LV assessment using conventional two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography.
    METHODS: The study was conducted on 75 healthy pregnant women (the case group) and 75 non-pregnant women (the control group). The participants attended Al-Fortat Teaching Hospital from April 1, 2022, to May 30, 2023, and had 2D and 4D echocardiographic studies performed on them.
    RESULTS: The LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and cardiac output (CO) were significantly increased in the case group compared to the control group (90.87 ± 18.03 ml vs. 62.64 ± 14.11 ml, P<0.001; 35.59 ± 6.52 ml vs. 22.42 ± 5.82 ml, P<0.001; and 4.87 ± 1.27 vs. 3.35 ± 0.87 L/m, P<0.001, respectively). In contrast, the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly decreased in the pregnant group compared to the control group (60.37 ± 5.42 % vs. 64.04 ± 4.99 %, P<0.01). Additionally, the study showed significant differences in EDV, ESV, ejection fraction (EF%), and CO (P<0.001) between 2D and 4D echocardiography, according to the Bland Altman test.
    CONCLUSIONS: In healthy pregnant women in their third trimester, there is an increase in the indicators of preload (ventricular volume and CO) and a decrease in EF%. The 4DE provides detailed images and information about cardiac volumes and function, allowing for the early detection of any potential problems that may arise during pregnancy and thus improving the health outcomes of both the mother and the developing fetus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们假设如果使用计算机断层扫描(CT)图像作为学习数据,我们可以通过超声心动图克服体积低估,提高左心室(LV)容积测量的准确性。
    方法:我们对37例连续患者使用了一种由超声心动图和叠加CT图像组成的融合成像模式来识别心内膜边界。我们比较了使用和不使用CT学习迹线(TLs)获得的LV体积。此外,3D超声心动图用于比较在有和没有CT学习的情况下获得的LV体积以进行心内膜识别。比较学习前后超声心动图和CT衍生的LV体积之间的平均差异以及变异系数。Bland-Altman分析用于评估从2D学习前TL和3D学习后TL获得的LV体积(mL)的差异。
    结果:学习后TL比学习前TL更靠近心外膜。这种趋势在侧壁和前壁中尤其明显。在四腔视图中,学习后TL沿着基底侧壁中高回声层的内侧。CT融合成像确定2D超声心动图与CT的左心室容积差异较小(学习前-25.6±14.4mL,学习后-6.9±11.5mL),并且CT学习提高了变异系数(学习前10.9%,学习后的7.8%)。在3D超声心动图中观察到显着改善;3D超声心动图与CT之间的LV体积差异很小(学习前-20.5±15.1mL,学习后3.8±15.7mL),变异系数提高(学习前11.5%,学习后9.3%)。
    结论:使用CT和超声心动图获得的LV体积之间的差异在CT融合成像后消失或缩小。融合成像在使用超声心动图进行准确的LV体积定量的训练方案中很有用,并且可能有助于质量控制。
    We hypothesized that if computed tomography (CT) images were used as learning data, we could overcome volume underestimation by echocardiography, improving the accuracy of left ventricular (LV) volume measurements.
    We utilized a fusion imaging modality consisting of echocardiography with superimposed CT images for 37 consecutive patients to identify the endocardial boundary. We compared LV volumes obtained with and without CT learning trace-lines (TLs). Furthermore, 3D echocardiography was used to compare LV volumes obtained with and without CT learning for endocardial identification. The mean difference between the echocardiography and CT-derived LV volumes and the coefficient of variation were compared pre- and post-learning. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the differences in LV volume (mL) obtained from the 2D pre-learning TL and 3D post-learning TL.
    The post-learning TL was located closer to the epicardium than the pre-learning TL. This trend was particularly pronounced in the lateral and the anterior wall. The post-learning TL was along the inner side of the high echoic layer in the basal-lateral wall in the four-chamber view. CT fusion imaging determined that the difference in LV volume between 2D echocardiography and CT was small (-25.6 ± 14.4 mL before learning, -6.9 ± 11.5 mL after learning) and that CT learning improved the coefficient of variation (10.9 % before learning, 7.8 % after learning). Significant improvements were observed during 3D echocardiography; the difference in LV volume between 3D echocardiography and CT was slight (-20.5 ± 15.1 mL before learning, 3.8 ± 15.7 mL after learning), and the coefficient of variation improved (11.5 % before learning, 9.3 % after learning).
    Differences between the LV volumes obtained using CT and echocardiography either disappeared or were reduced after CT fusion imaging. Fusion imaging is useful in training regimens for accurate LV volume quantification using echocardiography and may contribute to quality control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心血管磁共振(CMR)越来越多地用于患有先天性心脏病的新生儿。然而,该人群缺乏规范数据阻碍了心室容积和质量的报告.
    方法:健康足月(妊娠37-41周)新生儿接受非镇静治疗,在生命的第一周内使用“饲料和包装”技术进行自由呼吸CMR。舒张末期容积(EDV),计算左心室(LV)和右心室(RV)的收缩末期容积(ESV)每搏输出量(SV)和射血分数(EF).乳头状肌分别轮廓化,并包括在心肌体积中。通过将心肌体积乘以1.05g/ml来计算心肌质量。所有数据都以体重和体表面积(BSA)为索引。对10名随机选择的婴儿的数据进行观察者间变异性(IOV)。
    结果:包括20名健康新生儿(65%为男性),平均(SD)出生体重为3.54(0.46)kg,BSA为0.23(0.02)m2。标准LV参数为EDV39.0(4.1)ml/m2,ESV14.5(2.5)ml/m2和射血分数(EF)63.2(3.4)%。规范性RV索引EDV,ESV和EF分别为47.4(4.5)ml/m2,22.6(2.9)ml/m2和52.5(3.3)%。平均LV和RV指数质量分别为26.4(2.8)g/m2和12.5(2.0)g/m2。不同性别的心室容积没有差异。除RV质量(0.94)外,IOV良好,类内系数>0.95。
    结论:本研究提供了健康新生儿LV和RV参数的规范数据,为与患有结构性和功能性心脏病的新生儿进行比较提供了新的资源。
    Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used in newborns with congenital heart disease. However, reporting on ventricular volumes and mass is hindered by an absence of normative data in this population.
    Healthy term (37-41 weeks gestation) newborns underwent non-sedated, free-breathing CMR within the first week of life using the \'feed and wrap\' technique. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) stroke volume (SV) and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated for both left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV). Papillary muscles were separately contoured and included in the myocardial volume. Myocardial mass was calculated by multiplying myocardial volume by 1.05 g/ml. All data were indexed to weight and body surface area (BSA). Inter-observer variability (IOV) was performed on data from 10 randomly chosen infants.
    Twenty healthy newborns (65% male) with a mean (SD) birth weight of 3.54 (0.46) kg and BSA of 0.23 (0.02) m2 were included. Normative LV parameters were indexed EDV 39.0 (4.1) ml/m2, ESV 14.5 (2.5) ml/m2 and ejection fraction (EF) 63.2 (3.4)%. Normative RV indexed EDV, ESV and EF were 47.4 (4.5) ml/m2, 22.6 (2.9) ml/m2 and 52.5 (3.3)% respectively. Mean LV and RV indexed mass were 26.4 (2.8) g/m2 and 12.5 (2.0) g/m2, respectively. There was no difference in ventricular volumes by gender. IOV was excellent with an intra-class coefficient > 0.95 except for RV mass (0.94).
    This study provides normative data on LV and RV parameters in healthy newborns, providing a novel resource for comparison with newborns with structural and functional heart disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    左心室功能的分析主要基于左心室容积评估。尤其是在心脏瓣膜病中,对于定量方法来确定反流体积和反流分数,需要对总的和有效的每搏体积以及反流体积进行定量评估.在文学中,目前正在讨论超声心动图和心脏磁共振断层成像估计的心容积之间的差异.这种观点集中在评估两种模式的可比心脏体积的可行性。先前通过2D和3D超声心动图确定的心脏体积的低估可能是通过方法和技术限制来解释的。因此,这一观点旨在激发对心脏瓣膜疾病患者的超声心动图评估的紧急和批判性的重新思考,尤其是瓣膜反流,因为实际的综合方法可能太错误,容易以这种形式继续下去。应该用明确的定量方法代替或补充。一旦在考虑方法和技术因素的情况下进行超声心动图和数据分析,通过超声心动图进行有效的定量评估是可行的。不幸的是,这种方法的实施通常不能被认为是现实世界的条件。
    The analysis of left ventricular function is predominantly based on left ventricular volume assessment. Especially in valvular heart diseases, the quantitative assessment of total and effective stroke volumes as well as regurgitant volumes is necessary for a quantitative approach to determine regurgitant volumes and regurgitant fraction. In the literature, there is an ongoing discussion about differences between cardiac volumes estimated by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance tomography. This viewpoint focuses on the feasibility to assess comparable cardiac volumes with both modalities. The former underestimation of cardiac volumes determined by 2D and 3D echocardiography is presumably explained by methodological and technical limitations. Thus, this viewpoint aims to stimulate an urgent and critical rethinking of the echocardiographic assessment of patients with valvular heart diseases, especially valvular regurgitations, because the actual integrative approach might be too error prone to be continued in this form. It should be replaced or supplemented by a definitive quantitative approach. Valid quantitative assessment by echocardiography is feasible once echocardiography and data analysis are performed with methodological and technical considerations in mind. Unfortunately, implementation of this approach cannot generally be considered for real-world conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:缺血性心肌病治疗后左心室容积变化与长期预后之间的关联是否受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的影响尚不清楚。我们试图对缺血性心力衰竭的外科治疗(STICH)试验进行事后分析,以研究接受药物治疗(MED)且有或没有CABG的患者的这种关联。
    UNASSIGNED:从2002年7月24日至2007年5月5日,来自22个国家的99个研究中心的1212例缺血性心肌病患者被纳入STICH试验(NCT00023595),并被随机分配接受CABG+MED或单独接受MED。我们完成了对该试验的事后分析。我们的分析包括在基线和4个月测量的配对左心室收缩末期容积指数(ESVI)的患者。在MED组和CABG+MED组中评估了ESVI从基线到4个月的变化与心血管死亡率或全因死亡率之间的关系。
    未经批准:纳入523例患者,291(55.6%)分配给MED组,232(44.4%)分配给CABG+MED组。在4个月的随访中,在接受CABG加MED的患者中,ESVI降低的可能性更大。在中位随访10.3年后,ESVI每减少26%(1-标准偏差),在MED组,它与心血管死亡率风险降低22%(HR0.78;95%CI,0.65-0.94)和全因死亡率风险降低19%(HR0.81;95%CI,0.69-0.95)相关,而CABG+MED组(心血管死亡率:HR0.90;95CI,0.74~1.10;全因死亡率:HR0.93;95CI,0.79~1.09)未显示这种关联.ESVI降低16%被确定为MED臂中ESVI变化的最合适阈值。
    未经证实:缺血性心肌病患者,左心室容积改变与单纯药物治疗后的长期预后相关,然而,这可能不是评估与CABG相关的生存获益的最佳基准。ESVI降低16%以上可能有助于药物治疗患者的疗效评估和预后评估。
    UNASSIGNED:国家自然科学基金;广东省自然科学基金.
    UNASSIGNED: Whether the association between post-therapeutic left ventricular volume change and long-term outcomes in ischaemic cardiomyopathy is influenced by the performance of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unclear. We sought to perform a post-hoc analysis of the Surgical Treatment of Ischaemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial to investigate this association in patients treated with medical therapy (MED) with or without CABG.
    UNASSIGNED: From July 24, 2002, to May 5, 2007, 1212 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled in the STICH trial (NCT00023595) from 99 sites in 22 countries, and were randomly assigned to undergo CABG plus MED or MED alone. We completed a post-hoc analysis of this trial. Patients with paired left ventricular end-systolic volume index (ESVI) measured at baseline and 4-months were included in our analysis. The association between change in ESVI from baseline to 4-months and cardiovascular mortality or all-cause mortality was assessed in MED arm and CABG plus MED arm.
    UNASSIGNED: 523 patients were included, with 291 (55.6%) assigned to MED arm and 232 (44.4%) to CABG plus MED arm. At a 4-month follow-up, ESVI reduction was more likely to occur among patients undergoing CABG plus MED. After a median follow-up of 10.3 years, for each 26% (1- standard deviation) decrement in ESVI, it was associated with a 22% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.94) and 19% lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95) in MED arm, whereas this association was not shown in CABG plus MED arm (cardiovascular mortality: HR 0.90; 95%CI, 0.74-1.10; all-cause mortality: HR 0.93; 95%CI, 0.79-1.09). A 16% reduction in ESVI was determined to be the most appropriate threshold of change in ESVI in the MED arm.
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular volume change was associated with long-term prognosis after medical therapy alone, whereas was likely not an optimal benchmark for evaluating the survival benefits associated with CABG. A more than 16% reduction in ESVI might assist in therapeutic efficacy assessment and prognostic evaluation in medically treated patients.
    UNASSIGNED: National Natural Science Foundation of China; Natural Science Funds of Guangdong Province.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    虽然经胸三维超声心动图(3DE)现在推荐左心室(LV)容积测量指南,由于时间限制和所需的专业知识,广泛的实施受到限制。我们假设全自动3DE左心室定量软件可以提供准确的测量,它的应用可以消除这些障碍。
    为了解决这个假设,在使用全自动3DE软件(HeartModel或DynamicHeartModel,飞利浦医疗保健,安多佛,MA,美国)与心脏磁共振(CMR),从2015年到2021年。随机效应模型被用来确定偏见,相关性,和左心室舒张末期容积(EDV)的95%置信区间(CI),收缩末期容积(ESV),和EF。进行亚组和荟萃回归分析以确定调节者对结果的影响。
    在12项研究中(616项受试者),EDV的平均差异和95%CI,ESV,全自动3DE软件和CMR之间的EF为-19.6mL(95%CI;-27.6至-11.5mL),-11.4毫升(-16.7至-6.2毫升),和0.4%(-1.1%至2.0%),分别。两种方法的相关值分别为0.91(0.86-0.94),0.89(0.82-0.93),和0.85(0.81-0.88),分别。荟萃回归分析显示,这两个发表年份都没有影响,软件类型,或对LV体积和功能参数结果的分析类型,LVESV相关值的发表年份除外。
    尽管3DE仍然低估了LV的容量,观察到的差异不>20mL。EF显示与CMR相似的值。两种技术之间的良好相关性使全自动3DE左室定量软件可用于成人人群的常规临床实践。
    Although transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is now recommended by guidelines for left ventricular (LV) volumetric measurements, widespread implementation has been limited due to time constraints and required expertise. We hypothesized that fully automated 3DE left chamber quantification software might provide accurate measurements, and that its application could eliminate these obstacles.
    To address this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following a search for studies that compared LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using fully automated 3DE software (HeartModel or Dynamic HeartModel, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), from 2015 to 2021. A random effects model was used to determine biases, correlations, and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine effects of moderators on the outcome.
    Of 12 studies (616 subjects), mean differences and 95 % CIs in EDV, ESV, and EF between fully automated 3DE software and CMR were -19.6 mL (95 % CI; -27.6 to -11.5 mL), -11.4 mL (-16.7 to -6.2 mL), and 0.4 % (-1.1 to 2.0 %), respectively. Corresponding correlation values between the two methods were 0.91 (0.86-0.94), 0.89 (0.82-0.93), and 0.85 (0.81-0.88), respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed that there were no effects of either publication year, type of software, or type of analysis on the outcome of LV volumetric and functional parameters except for publication year on LVESV correlation values.
    Although 3DE still underestimates LV volumes, the observed differences were no >20 mL. EF showed similar values to CMR. Excellent correlations between the two techniques make fully automated 3DE left chamber quantification software useful for routine clinical practice in adult population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:HeartModel(HM)是一种全自动自适应量化软件,可快速量化左心容积和左心室功能。这项研究使用HM量化扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者的左心室舒张末期(LVEDV)和收缩末期体积(LVESV),冠状动脉性心脏病与节段性室壁运动异常,和肥厚型心肌病(HCM),以确定是否有可行性的差异,准确度,和测量LVEDV的可重复性,LVESV,左心室射血分数(LVEF)和左心房收缩末期容积(LAESV),并将这些测量值与传统二维(2D)和三维(3D)方法获得的测量值进行比较。
    目的:评价HM在临床患者左心室容积和LVEF定量中的应用价值。
    方法:将150例接受二维和三维超声心动图检查的受试者分为4组:(1)42例心脏形态和功能正常的患者(对照组,A组);(2)35例DCM患者(B组);(3)41例急性心肌梗死后LV重塑患者(C组);(4)32例HCM患者(D组)。LVEDV,LVESV,通过HM(HM-RE)和没有区域心内膜边界编辑(HM-NE)获得的LVEF和LAESV与通过传统2D/3D超声心动图方法测量的LVEF和LAESV进行比较,以评估相关性。一致性,和所有方法的可重复性。
    结果:(1)HM测得的参数在各组之间存在显着差异(均P<0.05)。与A组相比,C,D,B组LVEDV和LVESV较高(均P<0.05),LVEF较低(均P<0.05);(2)HM-NE高估LVEDV,LVESV,和LAESV具有较宽的偏差,而LVEF具有较小的偏差;轮廓调整降低了偏差和一致性限制(偏差:LVEDV,28.17mL,LVESV,14.92mL,LAESV,8.18mL,LVEF,-0.04%)。HM-RE与晚期心脏3D定量(3DQA)之间的相关性(rs=0.91-0.95,均P<0.05)高于HM-NE之间(rs=0.85-0.93,均P<0.05)和传统的2D方法。A组HM-RE与3DQA的相关性良好,B,和C,但D组(LVEDV和LVESV,rs=0.48-0.54,全部P<0.05);(3)HM-RE测量的观察者内部和观察者之间的变异性较低。
    结论:HM可用于量化常见心脏病患者的LV体积和LVEF,并具有足够的图像质量。具有轮廓编辑功能的HM具有很高的可重复性和准确性,可以推荐用于临床实践。
    BACKGROUND: HeartModel (HM) is a fully automated adaptive quantification software that can quickly quantify left heart volume and left ventricular function. This study used HM to quantify the left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDV) and end-systolic volumes (LVESV) of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), coronary artery heart disease with segmental wall motion abnormality, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) to determine whether there were differences in the feasibility, accuracy, and repeatability of measuring the LVEDV, LVESV, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial end-systolic volume (LAESV) and to compare these measurements with those obtained with traditional two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) methods.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application value of HM in quantifying left heart chamber volume and LVEF in clinical patients.
    METHODS: A total of 150 subjects who underwent 2D and 3D echocardiography were divided into 4 groups: (1) 42 patients with normal heart shape and function (control group, Group A); (2) 35 patients with DCM (Group B); (3) 41 patients with LV remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (Group C); and (4) 32 patients with HCM (Group D). The LVEDV, LVESV, LVEF and LAESV obtained by HM with (HM-RE) and without regional endocardial border editing (HM-NE) were compared with those measured by traditional 2D/3D echocardiographic methods to assess the correlation, consistency, and repeatability of all methods.
    RESULTS: (1) The parameters measured by HM were significantly different among the groups (P < 0.05 for all). Compared with Groups A, C, and D, Group B had higher LVEDV and LVESV (P < 0.05 for all) and lower LVEF (P < 0.05 for all); (2) HM-NE overestimated LVEDV, LVESV, and LAESV with wide biases and underestimated LVEF with a small bias; contour adjustment reduced the biases and limits of agreement (bias: LVEDV, 28.17 mL, LVESV, 14.92 mL, LAESV, 8.18 mL, LVEF, -0.04%). The correlations between HM-RE and advanced cardiac 3D quantification (3DQA) (r s = 0.91-0.95, P < 0.05 for all) were higher than those between HM-NE (r s = 0.85-0.93, P < 0.05 for all) and the traditional 2D methods. The correlations between HM-RE and 3DQA were good for Groups A, B, and C but remained weak for Group D (LVEDV and LVESV, r s = 0.48-0.54, P < 0.05 for all); and (3) The intraobserver and interobserver variability for the HM-RE measurements were low.
    CONCLUSIONS: HM can be used to quantify the LV volume and LVEF in patients with common heart diseases and sufficient image quality. HM with contour editing is highly reproducible and accurate and may be recommended for clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经批准:最近,开发了一种新的自动化软件(心脏模型)来获得三维(3D)左心室容积.这项研究的目的是验证自动3D超声心动图算法在心脏移植(HTx)患者中的可行性和准确性。使用常规的手动3D经胸超声心动图(TTE)描记和心脏磁共振(CMR)图像作为比较参考。
    未经评估:本研究前瞻性招募了103名健康HTx患者。在方案1中,左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV),左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV),左心房最大容积(LAVmax),使用自动3D超声心动图(3DE)获得LA最小体积(LAVmin)和LV射血分数(LVEF),并与通过手动3DE获得的相应值进行比较。在方案2中,将28名患者的自动3DE测量值与CMR参考值进行了比较。还测试了轮廓编辑和手术技术的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:心脏模型在97.1%的数据集中是可行的。在方案1中,对于所有参数,3DE和手动3DE之间存在强相关性(r=0.77至0.96,p<0.01)。与通过手动测量获得的值相比,自动算法高估了LV体积和LVEF,低估了LA体积。除LAVmin外,所有偏差都很小。轮廓调整后,偏差减少,所有一致限度均为临床可接受.在方案2中,带轮廓编辑的自动3DE和CMR之间LV和LA体积的相关性很强(r=0.74至0.93,p<0.01),但LVEF的相关性仍然中等(r=0.65,p<0.01)。与CMR相比,自动3DE高估了LV体积,但低估了LVEF和LA体积。仅对于LVEDV和LAVmax,协议的界限在临床上是可接受的。
    UNASSIGNED:使用自动心脏模型程序同时定量左心容积和LVEF是快速的,这是可行的,并且在很大程度上对HTX接收者是准确的。然而,与CMR相比,只有通过带有轮廓编辑的自动3DE测量的LVEDV和LAVmax似乎适用于临床实践。HTx收件人的自动化3DE是一个值得的尝试,尽管需要进一步的验证和优化。
    UNASSIGNED: Recently, a new automated software (Heart Model) was developed to obtain three-dimensional (3D) left heart chamber volumes. The aim of this study was to verify the feasibility and accuracy of the automated 3D echocardiographic algorithm in heart transplant (HTx) patients. Conventional manual 3D transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) tracings and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images were used as a reference for comparison.
    UNASSIGNED: This study enrolled 103 healthy HTx patients prospectively. In protocol 1, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), left atrial max volume (LAVmax), LA minimum volume (LAVmin) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were obtained using the automated 3D echocardiography (3DE) and compared with corresponding values obtained through the manual 3DE. In protocol 2, 28 patients\' automated 3DE measurements were compared with CMR reference values. The impacts of contour edit and surgical technique were also tested.
    UNASSIGNED: Heart Model was feasible in 97.1% of the data sets. In protocol 1, there was strong correlation between 3DE and manual 3DE for all the parameters (r = 0.77 to 0.96, p<0.01). Compared to values obtained through manual measurements, LV volumes and LVEF were overestimated by the automated algorithm and LA volumes were underestimated. All the biases were small except for that of LAVmin. After contour adjustment, the biases reduced and all the limits of agreement were clinically acceptable. In protocol 2, the correlations for LV and LA volumes were strong between automated 3DE with contour edit and CMR (r = 0.74 to 0.93, p<0.01) but correlation for LVEF remained moderate (r = 0.65, p < 0.01). Automated 3DE overestimated LV volumes but underestimated LVEF and LA volumes compared with CMR. The limits of agreement were clinically acceptable only for LVEDV and LAVmax.
    UNASSIGNED: Simultaneous quantification of left heart volumes and LVEF with the automated Heart Model program is rapid, feasible and to a great degree it is accurate in HTx recipients. Nevertheless, only LVEDV and LAVmax measured by automated 3DE with contour edit seem applicable for clinical practice when compared with CMR. Automated 3DE for HTx recipients is a worthy attempt, though further verification and optimization are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号