Interlaboratory comparison

实验室间比较
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:氯化石蜡(CPs)是由于其毒性而被归类为持久性有机污染物的工业化学品,坚持和倾向于远距离运输,生物累积和生物放大。尽管几十年来一直是环境关注的主题,CP的分析方法仍然难以达到足够的准确性。在对CP量化产生负面影响的问题中,缺乏完善的标准,作为纯物质和基质(认证)参考材料(CRM),发挥了重要作用。这项研究的重点是提供矩阵CRM作为质量控制工具,以提高CP测量结果的可比性。
    结果:我们介绍了ERM®-CE100的认证过程,这是第一种具有短链和中链氯化石蜡质量分数认证值的鱼类参考材料(短链氯化石蜡和MCCP,分别)。认证是根据ISO17034:2016和ISO指南35:2017进行的,价值分配步骤是通过对具有CP分析能力的实验室进行比较,并根据不同的分析原理应用程序。在确认CRM的同质性和稳定性后,为短链氯化石蜡分配了两个认证值,取决于使用的校准物:31±9μgkg-1和23±7μgkg-1。MCCP认证值为44±17μgkg-1。所有指定的值都是相对于CRM中的湿重,该CRM是作为鱼酱生产的,以增强与常规生物群样品的相似性。
    鱼组织ERM-CE100是第一个商业上可用于分析CP的矩阵CRM,使分析实验室能够提高测量的准确性和计量可追溯性。认证的CP值基于气相和液相色谱以及各种质谱技术获得的结果,因此,为使用不同分析方法和设备的实验室提供了广泛的有效性。
    BACKGROUND: Chlorinated paraffins (CPs) are industrial chemicals categorised as persistent organic pollutants because of their toxicity, persistency and tendency to long-range transport, bioaccumulation and biomagnification. Despite having been the subject of environmental attention for decades, analytical methods for CPs still struggle reaching a sufficient degree of accuracy. Among the issues negatively impacting the quantification of CPs, the unavailability of well-characterised standards, both as pure substances and as matrix (certified) reference materials (CRMs), has played a major role. The focus of this study was to provide a matrix CRM as quality control tool to improve the comparability of CPs measurement results.
    RESULTS: We present the process of certification of ERM®-CE100, the first fish reference material assigned with certified values for the mass fraction of short-chain and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs and MCCPs, respectively). The certification was performed in accordance with ISO 17034:2016 and ISO Guide 35:2017, with the value assignment step carried out via an intercomparison of laboratories of demonstrated competence in CPs analysis and applying procedures based on different analytical principles. After confirmation of the homogeneity and stability of the CRM, two certified values were assigned for SCCPs, depending on the calibrants used: 31 ± 9 μg kg-1 and 23 ± 7 μg kg-1. The MCCPs certified value was established as 44 ± 17 μg kg-1. All assigned values are relative to wet weight in the CRM that was produced as a fish paste to enhance similarity to routine biota samples.
    UNASSIGNED: The fish tissue ERM-CE100 is the first matrix CRM commercially available for the analysis of CPs, enabling analytical laboratories to improve the accuracy and the metrological traceability of their measurements. The certified CPs values are based on results obtained by both gas and liquid chromatography coupled with various mass spectrometric techniques, offering thus a broad validity to laboratories employing different analytical methods and equipment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    开发并验证了HPLC-MS/MS多类方法,用于定量牛奶和家禽饲料中15种不同类别的兽药残留(>140分析物)。大多数分析物符合常规实验室的准确性标准,>83%的牛奶和50-60%的鸡饲料,表观回收率为60-140%。对于>95%的分析物,牛奶和>80%的鸡饲料,满足提取效率标准。对于两种基质中的80-90%的分析物,中间精密度满足RSD<20%的SANTE标准。对于牛奶中存在MRL的所有分析物,LOQ低于相关MRL。在实验室间比较中分析了29种商品牛奶和鸡肉饲料样品。牛奶样品中未发现兽药残留。然而,饲料样品显示出高水平的尼卡巴嗪,盐霉素,和去碱。
    An HPLC-MS/MS multi-class method for quantitation of 15 different classes of veterinary drug residues (>140 analytes) in milk and poultry feed was developed and validated. Accuracy criteria for routine laboratories were met for the majority of analytes, > 83 % in milk and between 50 and 60 % in chicken feed, with an apparent recovery of 60-140 %. Extraction efficiency criteria were met for >95 % of the analytes for milk and > 80 % for chicken feed. Intermediate precision meets the SANTE criterion of RSD < 20 % for 80-90 % of the analytes in both matrices. For all analytes with an existing MRL in milk, the LOQ was below the related MRL. Twenty-nine samples of commercial milk and chicken feed were analyzed within the interlaboratory comparison. No residues of veterinary drugs were found in the milk samples. However, the feed samples exhibited high levels of nicarbazin, salinomycin, and decoquinate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    化学分析的质量是基于被动采样的环境评估的重要方面。本研究报告了一种能力测试计划,用于对有机硅和低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)被动采样器中的疏水性有机化合物以及极性有机化学综合采样器中的亲水性化合物进行化学分析。聚合物相中疏水性化合物浓度的实验室间变异系数(CV)的中位数为33%(有机硅)和38%(LDPE),类似于在该计划的前四轮中获得的简历。所有轮次的中值CV为32%。对于吸附剂中的亲水性化合物浓度,观察到更高的可变性:未转化数据为50%,对数转化后为1.6倍。将数据限制在表现最好的实验室并没有导致更少的变异性。亲水性化合物的数据质量仅与使用结构相同的内标弱相关,与提取溶剂和提取时间的选择无关。由性能最好的实验室进行的疏水性化合物采样的水性浓度估计值的标准偏差为有机硅的0.21log单位和LDPE的0.27log单位(1.6至1.9的因子)。其含义是,与实验室内质量控制程序相比,能力测试计划可能会对化学分析中的不确定性提供更现实的估计,并且在环境评估中应考虑这些高度不确定性。
    The quality of chemical analysis is an important aspect of passive sampling-based environmental assessments. The present study reports on a proficiency testing program for the chemical analysis of hydrophobic organic compounds in silicone and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) passive samplers and hydrophilic compounds in polar organic chemical integrative samplers. The median between-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) of hydrophobic compound concentrations in the polymer phase were 33% (silicone) and 38% (LDPE), similar to the CVs obtained in four earlier rounds of this program. The median CV over all rounds was 32%. Much higher variabilities were observed for hydrophilic compound concentrations in the sorbent: 50% for the untransformed data and a factor of 1.6 after log transformation. Limiting the data to the best performing laboratories did not result in less variability. Data quality for hydrophilic compounds was only weakly related to the use of structurally identical internal standards and was unrelated to the choice of extraction solvent and extraction time. Standard deviations of the aqueous concentration estimates for hydrophobic compound sampling by the best performing laboratories were 0.21 log units for silicone and 0.27 log units for LDPE (factors of 1.6 to 1.9). The implications are that proficiency testing programs may give more realistic estimates of uncertainties in chemical analysis than within-laboratory quality control programs and that these high uncertainties should be taken into account in environmental assessments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    实验室间比较(ILC)研究的数据和结果,外部质量评估(EQA)和能力测试(PT)活动对医学实验室诊断所有学科的进一步发展都是重要而有价值的贡献,以及体外诊断试验的评价和比较。到目前为止,然而,关于实验室间比较的出版物中没有关于哪些基本项目的建议。欧洲实验室医学外部质量保证提供商组织(EQALM)认识到需要此类建议,这些是由一组专家开发的。这项努力的结果是关于实验室间比较活动出版物(PubILC)中建议处理的项目的EQALM声明,结合用户友好的清单。一旦被作者和期刊采用,EQALM声明将确保有关EQA/PT活动的出版物中包含基本信息和/或与研究相关的事实。
    Data and results from interlaboratory comparison (ILC) studies, external quality assessment (EQA) and proficiency testing (PT) activities are important and valuable contributions both to the further development of all disciplines of medical laboratory diagnostics, and to the evaluation and comparison of in vitro diagnostic assays. So far, however, there are no recommendations as to which essential items should be addressed in publications on interlaboratory comparisons. The European Organization of External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) recognized the need for such recommendations, and these were developed by a group of experts. The result of this endeavor is the EQALM Statement on items recommended to be addressed in publications on interlaboratory comparison activities (PubILC), in conjunction with a user-friendly checklist. Once adopted by authors and journals, the EQALM Statement will ensure essential information and/or study-related facts are included within publications on EQA/PT activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    几个欧盟实验室报告了使用委员会法规(EC)第152/2009号中描述的分光光度法测定宠物饲料中的尿素含量,缺乏所需的选择性。虽然尿素不被授权作为宠物饲料中的添加剂,控制宠物饲料中的尿素具有经济重要性,因为添加尿素可能会非法增加表观蛋白质含量。为了研究不同分析技术的能力,组织了能力测试,参与者(欧盟官方控制实验室,来自学术界和私人实验室的实验室)可以自由地使用他们选择的方法来分析三种狗饲料测试材料,其中两个样品掺加了尿素。21个实验室使用以下技术提交了结果:分光光度法(实施法规(EC)No152/2009),LC-MS/MS,HPLC-UV,酶比色法,重力法和“内部光度”方法。只有两个使用LC-MS/MS的实验室能够准确量化质量分数为18.9mgkg-1的测试材料中的尿素,而一个使用“内部光度法”的参与者和一个使用酶法的参与者在258.9mgkg-1的水平上获得了令人满意的结果。除了使用LC-MS/MS的五名参与者在三种测试材料中提供最高成功率的技术是LC-MS/MS,而分光光度法,基于酶的方法和HPLC-UV方法除了导致结果分散而不适用于合规性分析外,还导致结果被高估。为了解决宠物饲料中低水平尿素的测定,需要一种比立法中描述的方法更好的方法。
    The determination of urea in pet feed at contaminant levels using the spectrophotometric method described in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 has been reported by several EU laboratories to lack the required selectivity. Whilst urea is not authorised as an additive in pet feed, the control of urea in pet feed is of economic importance, because the addition of urea may unlawfully increase the apparent protein content. To investigate the capabilities of different analytical techniques, a proficiency test was organised where the participants (EU official control laboratories, laboratories from the academia and private laboratories) were free to use their method of choice for analysing three dog feed test materials, two samples of which were spiked with urea. Twenty-one laboratories submitted results using the following techniques: spectrophotometry (Implementing Regulation (EC) No 152/2009), LC-MS/MS, HPLC-UV, enzymatic-colorimetry, gravimetry and an \'in-house photometric\' method. Only two laboratories that used LC-MS/MS were able to quantify urea accurately in the test material containing a mass fraction of 18.9 mg kg-1 whereas satisfactory results at the level of 258.9 mg kg-1 were obtained by one participant that used an \'in-house photometric method\' and one that used the enzymatic method, in addition to the five participants using LC-MS/MS. The technique that provided the highest success rate across the three test materials was LC-MS/MS, whereas spectrophotometry, the enzymatic-based and HPLC-UV methods led to overestimated results in addition to a dispersion of results not suitable for compliance analysis. To address the determination of urea in pet feed at low levels, a better performing method than the one described in the legislation is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近引入的统一pH([公式:见正文])概念使得能够在非水性和混合介质中进行严格的pH测量,同时保持与常规水性pH标度的可比性。然而,它的实际应用受到参考[公式:见正文]值不足的阻碍。为了改善这种情况,欧洲计量研究项目(EMPIR)UnipHied(“UnipHiedpH标度的实现”)在经验丰富的电化学专家实验室之间进行了实验室间比较,以通过对报告的测量数据进行广泛的统计处理来分配第一个此类参考[公式:见正文]值:水-乙醇混合物中的磷酸盐缓冲液(50wt%的乙醇)和纯乙醇中的甲酸铵缓冲液。两种不同的测量设置-一种易于在工业应用中采用-已用于演示[公式:见正文]测量的鲁棒性。这是在实践中更广泛采用[公式:见正文]概念的重要一步,像液相色谱法,生物燃料分析和电催化。
    The recently introduced unified pH ([Formula: see text]) concept enables rigorous pH measurements in non-aqueous and mixed media while at the same time maintaining comparability to the conventional aqueous pH scale. However, its practical application is hindered by a shortage of reference [Formula: see text] values. In order to improve this situation, the European Metrology Research Project (EMPIR) UnipHied (\"Realisation of a UnipHied pH scale\") launched an interlaboratory comparison among highly experienced electrochemistry expert laboratories to assign the first such reference [Formula: see text] values by adopting an extensive statistical treatment of the reported measurement data: to phosphate buffer in water-ethanol mixture (50 wt% of ethanol) and ammonium formate buffer in pure ethanol. Two different measurement setups - one capable of being easily adopted in industrial applications - have been used to demonstrate the robustness of [Formula: see text] measurement. This is an important step towards wider adoption of the [Formula: see text] concept in practice, like liquid chromatography, biofuels analysis and electrocatalysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的研究经常结合有机氟的测量,特别是因为他们可以支持基于阶级的监管方法。然而,目前还没有在广泛的矩阵中进行有机氟分析的标准化方法,包括使用燃烧离子色谱法(CIC)测量的可萃取有机氟(EOF)的方法。这里,我们报告了国际实验室间比较的结果。代表学术界的七个实验室,政府,私营部门测量了受水性成膜泡沫污染的地点的地下水和鳗鱼(安圭拉rostrata)中的成对EOF和PFAS浓度。在所有实验室中,有针对性的PFAS不能解释地下水中的所有EOF,但解释了鳗鱼中的大部分EOF。来自所有实验室的至少一种重复提取物的EOF结果落在地下水的实验室间平均值的一个标准偏差之内,而鳗鱼的七个实验室中有五个。在地下水和鳗鱼中进行EOF测量的PFAS加标混合物回收率接近标准化目标PFAS方法的标准(±30%)。CIC的仪器操作,例如重复进样,是测量不确定性的主要来源。空白污染和不完全的无机氟去除可能引入额外的不确定性。为了使用配对的EOF和PFAS测量来阐明未知有机氟的存在,我们建议分析师仔细考虑混杂的方法学不确定性,如测量之间的精度差异,数据处理步骤,如空白减法和重复分析,以及PFAS和其他氟化合物的相对回收率。
    Research on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) frequently incorporates organofluorine measurements, particularly because they could support a class-based approach to regulation. However, standardized methods for organofluorine analysis in a broad suite of matrices are currently unavailable, including a method for extractable organofluorine (EOF) measured using combustion ion chromatography (CIC). Here, we report the results of an international interlaboratory comparison. Seven laboratories representing academia, government, and the private sector measured paired EOF and PFAS concentrations in groundwater and eel (Anguilla rostrata) from a site contaminated by aqueous film-forming foam. Among all laboratories, targeted PFAS could not explain all EOF in groundwater but accounted for most EOF in eel. EOF results from all laboratories for at least one replicate extract fell within one standard deviation of the interlaboratory mean for groundwater and five out of seven laboratories for eel. PFAS spike mixture recoveries for EOF measurements in groundwater and eel were close to the criterion (±30%) for standardized targeted PFAS methods. Instrumental operation of the CIC such as replicate sample injections was a major source of measurement uncertainty. Blank contamination and incomplete inorganic fluorine removal may introduce additional uncertainties. To elucidate the presence of unknown organofluorine using paired EOF and PFAS measurements, we recommend that analysts carefully consider confounding methodological uncertainties such as differences in precision between measurements, data processing steps such as blank subtraction and replicate analyses, and the relative recoveries of PFAS and other fluorine compounds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于废水的SARS-CoV-2流行病学(WBE)已被证明是监测大流行动态的出色工具,可支持个人测试策略。WBE也可用作监测新病原体或病毒变体出现的早期预警系统。然而,为了及时传达结果,需要在靠近采样点的分散实验室进行复杂的样品物流和分析。由于多个分散实验室通常使用定制的内部工作流程进行样品纯化和PCR分析,分析程序的比较质量控制对于报告可靠和可比的结果至关重要。在这项研究中,我们在专门用于PCR和基于高通量测序(HTS)的WBE分析的实验室进行了实验室间比较.来自低COVID-19发病率的冷冻储备样品以渐变的浓度和比例掺入不同的灭活的真正的SARS-CoV-2变体。使用实验室特异性方法将样品送到参与的实验室进行分析,并将报告的病毒基因组拷贝数和病毒变体的检测与预期值进行比较。所有PCR实验室都报告了所有加标样品的SARS-CoV-2基因组拷贝当量(GCE),平均实验室内和实验室间变异性分别为19%和104%,分别,在很大程度上再现了尖峰计划。基于PCR的基因分型是,依赖于潜在的PCR检测性能,能够预测变体特异性取代的相对量,甚至在具有低掺入量的样品中。通过HTS鉴定变体,然而,需要>100拷贝/mL的废水,并且在基因组覆盖率低于60%的情况下进行分析时,预测价值有限。该实验室间测试表明,尽管分离和分析程序高度异构,对SARS-CoV-2总体GCE和突变进行了准确测定.因此,分散的SARS-CoV-2废水监测是可行的,以产生可比的分析结果。然而,因为不是所有的检测都能检测到正确的变异,PCR和测序工作流程的事先评估以及持续的质量控制(如实验室间比较)对于正确的变异体检测是强制性的.
    Wastewater-based SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology (WBE) has proven as an excellent tool to monitor pandemic dynamics supporting individual testing strategies. WBE can also be used as an early warning system for monitoring the emergence of novel pathogens or viral variants. However, for a timely transmission of results, sophisticated sample logistics and analytics performed in decentralized laboratories close to the sampling sites are required. Since multiple decentralized laboratories commonly use custom in-house workflows for sample purification and PCR-analysis, comparative quality control of the analytical procedures is essential to report reliable and comparable results. In this study, we performed an interlaboratory comparison at laboratories specialized for PCR and high-throughput-sequencing (HTS)-based WBE analysis. Frozen reserve samples from low COVID-19 incidence periods were spiked with different inactivated authentic SARS-CoV-2 variants in graduated concentrations and ratios. Samples were sent to the participating laboratories for analysis using laboratory specific methods and the reported viral genome copy numbers and the detection of viral variants were compared with the expected values. All PCR-laboratories reported SARS-CoV-2 genome copy equivalents (GCE) for all spiked samples with a mean intra- and inter-laboratory variability of 19 % and 104 %, respectively, largely reproducing the spike-in scheme. PCR-based genotyping was, in dependence of the underlying PCR-assay performance, able to predict the relative amount of variant specific substitutions even in samples with low spike-in amount. The identification of variants by HTS, however, required >100 copies/ml wastewater and had limited predictive value when analyzing at a genome coverage below 60 %. This interlaboratory test demonstrates that despite highly heterogeneous isolation and analysis procedures, overall SARS-CoV-2 GCE and mutations were determined accurately. Hence, decentralized SARS-CoV-2 wastewater monitoring is feasible to generate comparable analysis results. However, since not all assays detected the correct variant, prior evaluation of PCR and sequencing workflows as well as sustained quality control such as interlaboratory comparisons are mandatory for correct variant detection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗器械制造商在与人体接触时,有义务证明其产品的生物相容性。医疗器械生物学评价的要求由国际标准ISO10993规定。本系列的第五部分描述了体外细胞毒性测试的性能。本试验评估医疗器械使用对细胞健康的影响。特定标准的存在表明测试将产生可靠和可比的结果。然而,ISO10993-5在测试规范中提供了广泛的自由度。在过去,我们注意到不同实验室的结果不一致。
    要确定ISO10993-5标准的规格是否明确,以确保测试结果的可比性,并且,如果不是,确定潜在的影响因素。
    根据ISO10993-5对体外细胞毒性测试进行实验室间比较。52个国际实验室评估了两个未知样品的细胞毒性。一个是聚乙烯(PE)管材,预计是非细胞毒性的,另一种是聚氯乙烯(PVC)管,推测其具有细胞毒性潜力。要求所有实验室以预定的提取规格进行洗脱测试。其他测试参数由实验室根据标准设定的指南自由选择。
    令我们惊讶的是,只有58%的参与实验室发现了两种材料的细胞毒性潜力。特别是对于PVC,观察到实验室之间的结果存在相当大的差异[平均值=43±30(SD),min=0,max=100]。我们发现提取培养基中补充了百分之十的血清,以及细胞与提取物的孵育时间更长,大大提高了PVC的测试灵敏度。
    结果清楚地表明,ISO10993-5设定的规格不够明确,无法获得相同医疗设备的可比结果。为了设定确保可靠的细胞毒性评估的要求,需要进一步研究以确定特定材料和/或设备的最佳测试条件,并且需要对标准进行相应修订。
    UNASSIGNED: Medical device manufacturers are obliged to prove the biocompatibility of their products when they come into contact with the human body. The requirements for the biological evaluation of medical devices are specified by the international standard series ISO 10993. Part five of this series describes the performance of in vitro cytotoxicity tests. This test evaluates the effects of medical device use on cell health. The existence of the specific standard suggests that the tests will produce reliable and comparable results. However, the ISO 10993-5 offers wide latitude in the test specifications. In the past, we noticed inconsistencies of the results from different laboratories.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine if the specifications of the standard ISO 10993-5 are explicit to ensure the comparability of test results and, if not, identify potential influencing factors.
    UNASSIGNED: An interlaboratory comparison was conducted for the in vitro cytotoxicity test according to ISO 10993-5. Fifty-two international laboratories evaluated the cytotoxicity for two unknown samples. One was polyethylene (PE) tubing, which is expected to be non-cytotoxic and the other was polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing, for which a cytotoxic potential was presumed. All laboratories were asked to perform an elution test with predefined extraction specifications. The other test parameters were freely chosen by the laboratories according to the guidelines set by the standard.
    UNASSIGNED: To our surprise only 58 percent of the participating laboratories identified the cytotoxic potential of both materials as expected. Particularly for PVC a considerable variation of the results between the laboratories was observed [mean = 43 ± 30 (SD), min = 0, max = 100]. We showed that ten percent serum supplementation to the extraction medium, as well as longer incubation of the cells with the extract, greatly increased the test sensitivity for PVC.
    UNASSIGNED: The results clearly show that the specifications set by the ISO 10993-5 are not explicit enough to obtain comparable results for an identical medical device. To set requirements that ensure reliable cytotoxicity assessments, further research will be necessary to identify the best test conditions for specific materials and/or devices and the standard needs to be revised accordingly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗凝血杀鼠剂(ARs)用于控制啮齿动物种群。非目标物种的中毒可通过意外消耗用于啮齿动物控制的商业制剂而发生。用于确定动物组织中的AR的稳健方法对于动物死后诊断和法医目的很重要。我们评估了一种超高效液相色谱与质谱联用(UPLC-MS)方法来定量8种ARs(brodifacoum,溴敌隆,氯霉素,coumachlor,双香丸,difathialone,苯丙胺酮,华法林)在广泛的动物(牛,犬,鸡肉,马,猪)肝脏样本,包括发生的样品。我们在2项实验室间比较(ILC)研究中进一步评估了UPLC-MS;一项是ILC练习(ICE),另一个是能力测试(PT)。UPLC-MS的检出限为0.3-3.1ng/g,定量限为0.8-9.4ng/g。UPLC-MS的回收率为90-115%,对于50、500和2,000ng/g加标肝脏样品,8种ARs中的每一种的相对SD为1.2-13%。参与2项ILC研究的实验室的总体准确性(ICE和PT研究的4个和11个实验室,分别)为86-118%,相对重复性SD为3.7-11%,相对重现性SDs为7.8-31.2%,和Horwitz比值为0.5-1.5。通过ILC的研究,我们验证了UPLC-MS用于肝脏基质中AR分析的准确性,并证明ILC可用于评估分析方法的性能特征.
    Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are used to control rodent populations. Poisoning of non-target species can occur by accidental consumption of commercial formulations used for rodent control. A robust method for determining ARs in animal tissues is important for animal postmortem diagnostic and forensic purposes. We evaluated an ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) method to quantify 8 ARs (brodifacoum, bromadiolone, chlorophacinone, coumachlor, dicoumarol, difethialone, diphacinone, warfarin) in a wide range of animal (bovine, canine, chicken, equine, porcine) liver samples, including incurred samples. We further evaluated UPLC-MS in 2 interlaboratory comparison (ILC) studies; one an ILC exercise (ICE), the other a proficiency test (PT). The limits of detection of UPLC-MS were 0.3-3.1 ng/g, and the limits of quantification were 0.8-9.4 ng/g. The recoveries obtained using UPLC-MS were 90-115%, and relative SDs were 1.2-13% for each of the 8 ARs for the 50, 500, and 2,000 ng/g spiked liver samples. The overall accuracy from the laboratories participating in the 2 ILC studies (4 and 11 laboratories for ICE and PT studies, respectively) were 86-118%, with relative repeatability SDs of 3.7-11%, relative reproducibility SDs of 7.8-31.2%, and Horwitz ratio values of 0.5-1.5. Via the ILC studies, we verified the accuracy of UPLC-MS for AR analysis in liver matrices and demonstrated that ILC can be utilized to evaluate performance characteristics of analytical methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号