Interlaboratory comparison

实验室间比较
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近引入的统一pH([公式:见正文])概念使得能够在非水性和混合介质中进行严格的pH测量,同时保持与常规水性pH标度的可比性。然而,它的实际应用受到参考[公式:见正文]值不足的阻碍。为了改善这种情况,欧洲计量研究项目(EMPIR)UnipHied(“UnipHiedpH标度的实现”)在经验丰富的电化学专家实验室之间进行了实验室间比较,以通过对报告的测量数据进行广泛的统计处理来分配第一个此类参考[公式:见正文]值:水-乙醇混合物中的磷酸盐缓冲液(50wt%的乙醇)和纯乙醇中的甲酸铵缓冲液。两种不同的测量设置-一种易于在工业应用中采用-已用于演示[公式:见正文]测量的鲁棒性。这是在实践中更广泛采用[公式:见正文]概念的重要一步,像液相色谱法,生物燃料分析和电催化。
    The recently introduced unified pH ([Formula: see text]) concept enables rigorous pH measurements in non-aqueous and mixed media while at the same time maintaining comparability to the conventional aqueous pH scale. However, its practical application is hindered by a shortage of reference [Formula: see text] values. In order to improve this situation, the European Metrology Research Project (EMPIR) UnipHied (\"Realisation of a UnipHied pH scale\") launched an interlaboratory comparison among highly experienced electrochemistry expert laboratories to assign the first such reference [Formula: see text] values by adopting an extensive statistical treatment of the reported measurement data: to phosphate buffer in water-ethanol mixture (50 wt% of ethanol) and ammonium formate buffer in pure ethanol. Two different measurement setups - one capable of being easily adopted in industrial applications - have been used to demonstrate the robustness of [Formula: see text] measurement. This is an important step towards wider adoption of the [Formula: see text] concept in practice, like liquid chromatography, biofuels analysis and electrocatalysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的研究经常结合有机氟的测量,特别是因为他们可以支持基于阶级的监管方法。然而,目前还没有在广泛的矩阵中进行有机氟分析的标准化方法,包括使用燃烧离子色谱法(CIC)测量的可萃取有机氟(EOF)的方法。这里,我们报告了国际实验室间比较的结果。代表学术界的七个实验室,政府,私营部门测量了受水性成膜泡沫污染的地点的地下水和鳗鱼(安圭拉rostrata)中的成对EOF和PFAS浓度。在所有实验室中,有针对性的PFAS不能解释地下水中的所有EOF,但解释了鳗鱼中的大部分EOF。来自所有实验室的至少一种重复提取物的EOF结果落在地下水的实验室间平均值的一个标准偏差之内,而鳗鱼的七个实验室中有五个。在地下水和鳗鱼中进行EOF测量的PFAS加标混合物回收率接近标准化目标PFAS方法的标准(±30%)。CIC的仪器操作,例如重复进样,是测量不确定性的主要来源。空白污染和不完全的无机氟去除可能引入额外的不确定性。为了使用配对的EOF和PFAS测量来阐明未知有机氟的存在,我们建议分析师仔细考虑混杂的方法学不确定性,如测量之间的精度差异,数据处理步骤,如空白减法和重复分析,以及PFAS和其他氟化合物的相对回收率。
    Research on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) frequently incorporates organofluorine measurements, particularly because they could support a class-based approach to regulation. However, standardized methods for organofluorine analysis in a broad suite of matrices are currently unavailable, including a method for extractable organofluorine (EOF) measured using combustion ion chromatography (CIC). Here, we report the results of an international interlaboratory comparison. Seven laboratories representing academia, government, and the private sector measured paired EOF and PFAS concentrations in groundwater and eel (Anguilla rostrata) from a site contaminated by aqueous film-forming foam. Among all laboratories, targeted PFAS could not explain all EOF in groundwater but accounted for most EOF in eel. EOF results from all laboratories for at least one replicate extract fell within one standard deviation of the interlaboratory mean for groundwater and five out of seven laboratories for eel. PFAS spike mixture recoveries for EOF measurements in groundwater and eel were close to the criterion (±30%) for standardized targeted PFAS methods. Instrumental operation of the CIC such as replicate sample injections was a major source of measurement uncertainty. Blank contamination and incomplete inorganic fluorine removal may introduce additional uncertainties. To elucidate the presence of unknown organofluorine using paired EOF and PFAS measurements, we recommend that analysts carefully consider confounding methodological uncertainties such as differences in precision between measurements, data processing steps such as blank subtraction and replicate analyses, and the relative recoveries of PFAS and other fluorine compounds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗器械制造商在与人体接触时,有义务证明其产品的生物相容性。医疗器械生物学评价的要求由国际标准ISO10993规定。本系列的第五部分描述了体外细胞毒性测试的性能。本试验评估医疗器械使用对细胞健康的影响。特定标准的存在表明测试将产生可靠和可比的结果。然而,ISO10993-5在测试规范中提供了广泛的自由度。在过去,我们注意到不同实验室的结果不一致。
    要确定ISO10993-5标准的规格是否明确,以确保测试结果的可比性,并且,如果不是,确定潜在的影响因素。
    根据ISO10993-5对体外细胞毒性测试进行实验室间比较。52个国际实验室评估了两个未知样品的细胞毒性。一个是聚乙烯(PE)管材,预计是非细胞毒性的,另一种是聚氯乙烯(PVC)管,推测其具有细胞毒性潜力。要求所有实验室以预定的提取规格进行洗脱测试。其他测试参数由实验室根据标准设定的指南自由选择。
    令我们惊讶的是,只有58%的参与实验室发现了两种材料的细胞毒性潜力。特别是对于PVC,观察到实验室之间的结果存在相当大的差异[平均值=43±30(SD),min=0,max=100]。我们发现提取培养基中补充了百分之十的血清,以及细胞与提取物的孵育时间更长,大大提高了PVC的测试灵敏度。
    结果清楚地表明,ISO10993-5设定的规格不够明确,无法获得相同医疗设备的可比结果。为了设定确保可靠的细胞毒性评估的要求,需要进一步研究以确定特定材料和/或设备的最佳测试条件,并且需要对标准进行相应修订。
    UNASSIGNED: Medical device manufacturers are obliged to prove the biocompatibility of their products when they come into contact with the human body. The requirements for the biological evaluation of medical devices are specified by the international standard series ISO 10993. Part five of this series describes the performance of in vitro cytotoxicity tests. This test evaluates the effects of medical device use on cell health. The existence of the specific standard suggests that the tests will produce reliable and comparable results. However, the ISO 10993-5 offers wide latitude in the test specifications. In the past, we noticed inconsistencies of the results from different laboratories.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine if the specifications of the standard ISO 10993-5 are explicit to ensure the comparability of test results and, if not, identify potential influencing factors.
    UNASSIGNED: An interlaboratory comparison was conducted for the in vitro cytotoxicity test according to ISO 10993-5. Fifty-two international laboratories evaluated the cytotoxicity for two unknown samples. One was polyethylene (PE) tubing, which is expected to be non-cytotoxic and the other was polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing, for which a cytotoxic potential was presumed. All laboratories were asked to perform an elution test with predefined extraction specifications. The other test parameters were freely chosen by the laboratories according to the guidelines set by the standard.
    UNASSIGNED: To our surprise only 58 percent of the participating laboratories identified the cytotoxic potential of both materials as expected. Particularly for PVC a considerable variation of the results between the laboratories was observed [mean = 43 ± 30 (SD), min = 0, max = 100]. We showed that ten percent serum supplementation to the extraction medium, as well as longer incubation of the cells with the extract, greatly increased the test sensitivity for PVC.
    UNASSIGNED: The results clearly show that the specifications set by the ISO 10993-5 are not explicit enough to obtain comparable results for an identical medical device. To set requirements that ensure reliable cytotoxicity assessments, further research will be necessary to identify the best test conditions for specific materials and/or devices and the standard needs to be revised accordingly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗凝血杀鼠剂(ARs)用于控制啮齿动物种群。非目标物种的中毒可通过意外消耗用于啮齿动物控制的商业制剂而发生。用于确定动物组织中的AR的稳健方法对于动物死后诊断和法医目的很重要。我们评估了一种超高效液相色谱与质谱联用(UPLC-MS)方法来定量8种ARs(brodifacoum,溴敌隆,氯霉素,coumachlor,双香丸,difathialone,苯丙胺酮,华法林)在广泛的动物(牛,犬,鸡肉,马,猪)肝脏样本,包括发生的样品。我们在2项实验室间比较(ILC)研究中进一步评估了UPLC-MS;一项是ILC练习(ICE),另一个是能力测试(PT)。UPLC-MS的检出限为0.3-3.1ng/g,定量限为0.8-9.4ng/g。UPLC-MS的回收率为90-115%,对于50、500和2,000ng/g加标肝脏样品,8种ARs中的每一种的相对SD为1.2-13%。参与2项ILC研究的实验室的总体准确性(ICE和PT研究的4个和11个实验室,分别)为86-118%,相对重复性SD为3.7-11%,相对重现性SDs为7.8-31.2%,和Horwitz比值为0.5-1.5。通过ILC的研究,我们验证了UPLC-MS用于肝脏基质中AR分析的准确性,并证明ILC可用于评估分析方法的性能特征.
    Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are used to control rodent populations. Poisoning of non-target species can occur by accidental consumption of commercial formulations used for rodent control. A robust method for determining ARs in animal tissues is important for animal postmortem diagnostic and forensic purposes. We evaluated an ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) method to quantify 8 ARs (brodifacoum, bromadiolone, chlorophacinone, coumachlor, dicoumarol, difethialone, diphacinone, warfarin) in a wide range of animal (bovine, canine, chicken, equine, porcine) liver samples, including incurred samples. We further evaluated UPLC-MS in 2 interlaboratory comparison (ILC) studies; one an ILC exercise (ICE), the other a proficiency test (PT). The limits of detection of UPLC-MS were 0.3-3.1 ng/g, and the limits of quantification were 0.8-9.4 ng/g. The recoveries obtained using UPLC-MS were 90-115%, and relative SDs were 1.2-13% for each of the 8 ARs for the 50, 500, and 2,000 ng/g spiked liver samples. The overall accuracy from the laboratories participating in the 2 ILC studies (4 and 11 laboratories for ICE and PT studies, respectively) were 86-118%, with relative repeatability SDs of 3.7-11%, relative reproducibility SDs of 7.8-31.2%, and Horwitz ratio values of 0.5-1.5. Via the ILC studies, we verified the accuracy of UPLC-MS for AR analysis in liver matrices and demonstrated that ILC can be utilized to evaluate performance characteristics of analytical methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在五个欧洲实验室中组织了一项环形试验,以达到人畜共患寄生虫弓形虫的微卫星(MS)分型的一致性。根据先前公开的基于15个MS标记的片段长度多态性的方法,由每个实验室循环和分析三个样品组。第一样品组比较了一般的分型结果并集中于DNA浓度的影响;第二样品组集中于可以区分相同原型谱系内的弓形虫菌株的多态性指纹标记;和第三样品组集中于非原型基因型。实验室之间的方法差异,包括用于确定MS片段长度的软件程序,使用问卷进行了整理。总的来说,谱系水平的分型结果达成了高度一致,尤其是在DNA浓度最高的样本中。然而,观察到特定标志物的实验室特异性差异.片段长度的主要中位数差异,多达6个碱基对,与用于标记片段特异性引物的荧光团有关。此外,从不同供应商获得的具有相同序列的引物对产生不同长度的片段。此外,测序图谱评估和解释方式的差异可能导致片段长度测定的结果偏差.MS打字的协调,例如,通过使用相同的荧光团或通过对所确定的片段长度进行数值调整,可以提高实验室结果的一致性。这是第一次实验室间比较,为优化该技术提供指导(作为补充)。
    A ring trial among five European laboratories was organized to reach consistency in microsatellite (MS) typing of the zoonotic parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Three sample sets were circulated and analyzed by each laboratory following a previously published method that is based on fragment length polymorphism of 15 MS markers. The first sample set compared typing results in general and focused on effects of DNA concentration; the second sample set focused on the polymorphic fingerprinting markers that can differentiate T. gondii strains within the same archetypal lineage; and the third set focused on non-archetypal genotypes. Methodological variations between laboratories, including the software programs used to determine MS fragment length, were collated using a questionnaire. Overall, lineage-level typing results reached a high level of agreement, especially in samples with the highest DNA concentrations. However, laboratory-specific differences were observed for particular markers. Major median differences in fragment length, of up to 6 base pairs, were related to the fluorophore used to label fragment-specific primers. In addition, primer pairs with identical sequences obtained from different suppliers resulted in fragments of differing length. Furthermore, differences in the way the sequencing profiles were assessed and interpreted may have led to deviating results in fragment length determination. Harmonization of MS typing, for example, by using the same fluorophores or by numerical adjustments applied to the fragment-lengths determined, could improve the uniformity of the results across laboratories. This is the first interlaboratory comparison, providing guidelines (added as a supplement) for the optimization of this technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:准确可靠地检测人血清游离甲状腺素(FT4)对于甲状腺疾病的诊断和治疗至关重要。然而,人们对FT4测量在患者护理中的表现提出了担忧。疾病控制和预防中心临床标准化计划(CDC-CSP)通过创建FT4标准化计划来标准化FT4测量来解决这些问题。该研究旨在开发一种高度准确和精确的候选参考测量程序(cRMP),作为CDC-CSP的一个关键组成部分,用于FT4测量的标准化。
    方法:根据临床和实验室标准研究所C45-A指南和已发布的RMP[23]中的推荐条件,采用平衡透析(ED)将血清FT4与蛋白质结合的甲状腺素分离。用液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)直接定量透析液中的FT4,无需衍生。试样和校准溶液的重量测量,校准器括号,同位素稀释,增强的色谱分辨率,和T4特定的质量转变用于确保准确性,精度,和cRMP的特异性。
    结果:在实验室间比较研究中,所述cRMP与已建立的RMP和其他两种cRMP非常吻合。每种方法对总体实验室平均值的平均偏差在±2.5%内。日内,跨日,cRMP的总不精确性在4.4%以内。检出限为0.90pmol/L,对于甲状腺功能减退症患者的FT4具有足够的敏感性。透析液中T4和内源性组分的结构类似物不干扰测量。
    结论:我们的ED-LC-MS/MScRMP提供了很高的准确性,精度,特异性,和灵敏度的FT4测量。cRMP可以作为建立测量可追溯性的高级标准,并为FT4测定的标准化提供准确性基础。
    BACKGROUND: Accurate and reliable measurement of human serum free thyroxine (FT4) is critical for the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid diseases. However, concerns have been raised regarding the performance of FT4 measurements in patient care. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Standardization Programs (CDC-CSP) address these concerns by creating a FT4 standardization program to standardize FT4 measurements. The study aims to develop a highly accurate and precise candidate Reference Measurement Procedure (cRMP), as one key component of CDC-CSP, for standardization of FT4 measurements.
    METHODS: Serum FT4 was separated from protein-bound thyroxine with equilibrium dialysis (ED) following the recommended conditions in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute C45-A guideline and the published RMP [20,21,23]. FT4 in dialysate was directly quantified with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) without derivatization. Gravimetric measurements of specimens and calibrator solutions, calibrator bracketing, isotope dilution, enhanced chromatographic resolution, and T4 specific mass transitions were used to ensure the accuracy, precision, and specificity of the cRMP.
    RESULTS: The described cRMP agreed well with the established RMP and two other cRMPs in an interlaboratory comparison study. The mean biases of each method to the overall laboratory mean were within ±2.5%. The intra-day, inter-day, and total imprecision for the cRMP were within 4.4%. The limit of detection was 0.90 pmol/L, which was sufficiently sensitive to determine FT4 for patients with hypothyroidism. The structural analogs of T4 and endogenous components in dialysate did not interfere with the measurements.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our ED-LC-MS/MS cRMP provides high accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity for FT4 measurement. The cRMP can serve as a higher-order standard for establishing measurement traceability and provide an accuracy base for the standardization of FT4 assays.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于纳米材料毒性评估的最新体外测试系统基于染料和几个染色步骤,这些步骤可能会受到纳米材料干扰的影响。数字全息显微术(DHM),基于干涉的定量相位成像(QPI)变体,通过生物物理参数,以快速,无标记和无干扰的方式促进天然细胞群体的可靠增殖定量和形态特征的提取。因此,DHM已被确定为生物医学纳米技术中用于细胞毒性测试的通用工具。在两个合作实验室进行的比较研究中,我们研究了DHM在纳米材料毒性测试中的实验室间变异性和性能,利用互补的标准操作程序(SOP)。两个相同的定制离轴DHM系统,开发用于生物医学实验室,在欧洲的不同地点使用了配备有阶段顶部孵育室的培养室。时间干团发展,与毛地黄皂苷和细胞培养基对照相比,观察到A549人肺上皮细胞群与聚(氰基丙烯酸烷基酯)(PACA)纳米颗粒的两种变体孵育后的12小时干重增量和形态变化。洋地黄皂苷作为细胞毒性控制,以及空的和装载卡巴他赛的PACA纳米载体,同样影响了两个参与实验室的A549细胞的12小时干重发展和增量以及形态。获得的DHM数据反映了所测试纳米材料的细胞毒性潜力,并且与有关生物物理和化学分析的相应文献一致。我们的结果证实DHM作为聚合物纳米载体的无标记细胞毒性测定以及该技术的可重复性和再现性。总之,所评估的DHM测定可以在不同位置有效实施,并有助于纳米颗粒的实验室间体外毒性测试,具有在监管科学中的应用前景.
    State-of-the-art in vitro test systems for nanomaterial toxicity assessment are based on dyes and several staining steps which can be affected by nanomaterial interference. Digital holographic microscopy (DHM), an interferometry-based variant of quantitative phase imaging (QPI), facilitates reliable proliferation quantification of native cell populations and the extraction of morphological features in a fast and label- and interference-free manner by biophysical parameters. DHM therefore has been identified as versatile tool for cytotoxicity testing in biomedical nanotechnology. In a comparative study performed at two collaborating laboratories, we investigated the interlaboratory variability and performance of DHM in nanomaterial toxicity testing, utilizing complementary standard operating procedures (SOPs). Two identical custom-built off-axis DHM systems, developed for usage in biomedical laboratories, equipped with stage-top incubation chambers were applied at different locations in Europe. Temporal dry mass development, 12-h dry mass increments and morphology changes of A549 human lung epithelial cell populations upon incubation with two variants of poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate) (PACA) nanoparticles were observed in comparison to digitonin and cell culture medium controls. Digitonin as cytotoxicity control, as well as empty and cabazitaxel-loaded PACA nanocarriers, similarly impacted 12-h dry mass development and increments as well as morphology of A549 cells at both participating laboratories. The obtained DHM data reflected the cytotoxic potential of the tested nanomaterials and are in agreement with corresponding literature on biophysical and chemical assays. Our results confirm DHM as label-free cytotoxicity assay for polymeric nanocarriers as well as the repeatability and reproducibility of the technology. In summary, the evaluated DHM assay could be efficiently implemented at different locations and facilitates interlaboratory in vitro toxicity testing of nanoparticles with prospects for application in regulatory science.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用侧流测定法(LFA)在45个南非CD4实验室对CD4计数<100细胞/µL的血液样本进行反射隐球菌抗原(CrAg)筛查。我们的目标是通过比较实验室间测试来评估常规LFA结果的可靠性。
    方法:所有来自CD4实验室的CrAg阳性和选定数量的CrAg阴性样本在配对的微生物学实验室使用相同的LFA进行重新测试。结果不一致的样品在参考实验室进行了测试,使用LFA(与CrAg滴度)。
    结果:在实验室间测试期间,重新测试了12502个样品,93(0.7%)不一致的结果和99.3%的实验室间一致性(科恩的kappa,0.98)。结果不一致的复测样本的比例为每对实验室的0.17%至5.31%(中位数为0.28%),3例报告>3%的结果为不一致。
    结论:常规CrAg筛查结果可靠,<1%的样本结果不一致,主要是由于解释和转录错误。
    OBJECTIVE: Reflex cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) screening of blood specimens with a CD4 count of <100 cells/µL was performed at 45 South African CD4 laboratories using a lateral flow assay (LFA). Our objective was to evaluate the reliability of routine LFA results through comparative interlaboratory testing.
    METHODS: All CrAg-positive and a selected number of CrAg-negative samples from the CD4 laboratories were retested at paired microbiology laboratories using the same LFA. Samples with discordant results were tested at a reference laboratory, using the LFA (with CrAg titers).
    RESULTS: During interlaboratory testing, 12,502 samples were retested, with 93 (0.7%) discordant results and a between-laboratory agreement of 99.3% (Cohen\'s kappa, 0.98). The proportion of retested samples with discordant results ranged from 0.17% to 5.31% per laboratory pair (median 0.28%), with 3 reporting >3% of results as discordant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Routine CrAg screening results were reliable, with <1% of samples having discordant results, mainly due to interpretation and transcription errors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号