ICD-10

ICD - 10
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    机器学习在医疗保健中的应用通常需要使用分层代码,例如国际疾病分类(ICD)和解剖治疗化学(ATC)系统。这些代码对疾病和药物进行分类,分别,从而形成广泛的数据维度。无监督特征选择解决了“维度的诅咒”,并通过减少无关或冗余特征的数量并避免过度拟合,有助于提高监督学习模型的准确性和性能。无监督特征选择技术,比如过滤器,包装器,和嵌入式方法,被实现为选择具有最内在信息的最重要的功能。然而,由于ICD和ATC代码的庞大数量以及这些系统的层次结构,他们面临挑战。
    本研究的目的是比较冠状动脉疾病患者ICD和ATC代码数据库的几种无监督特征选择方法的性能和复杂性的不同方面,并选择代表这些患者的最佳特征集。
    我们比较了艾伯塔省51,506名冠状动脉疾病患者的2个ICD和1个ATC代码数据库的几种无监督特征选择方法,加拿大。具体来说,我们用拉普拉斯分数,多集群数据的无监督特征选择,自动编码器启发的无监督特征选择,主要特征分析,和混凝土自动编码器有和没有ICD或ATC树的重量调整,从超过9000ICD和2000ATC代码中选择100个最佳功能。我们根据其重建初始特征空间和预测出院后90天死亡率的能力评估了选定的特征。我们还通过ICD或ATC树中的平均代码级别比较了所选特征的复杂性,以及使用Shapley分析的死亡率预测任务中特征的可解释性。
    在特征空间重构和死亡率预测中,具体的基于自动编码器的方法优于其他技术。特别是,权重调整后的混凝土自动编码器变体展示了改进的重建精度和显著的预测性能增强,经DeLong和McNemar检验证实(P<0.05)。混凝土自动编码器首选更通用的代码,他们一致准确地重建了所有特征。此外,与大多数替代方案相比,通过重量调整的混凝土自动编码器选择的特征在死亡率预测中产生了更高的Shapley值。
    这项研究在无监督的背景下仔细检查了ICD和ATC代码数据集中的5种特征选择方法。我们的发现强调了具体的自动编码器方法在选择代表整个数据集的显着特征方面的优越性,为后续机器学习研究提供潜在资产。我们还为专门为ICD和ATC代码数据集量身定制的具体自动编码器提供了一种新颖的权重调整方法,以增强所选功能的可泛化性和可解释性。
    UNASSIGNED: The application of machine learning in health care often necessitates the use of hierarchical codes such as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) systems. These codes classify diseases and medications, respectively, thereby forming extensive data dimensions. Unsupervised feature selection tackles the \"curse of dimensionality\" and helps to improve the accuracy and performance of supervised learning models by reducing the number of irrelevant or redundant features and avoiding overfitting. Techniques for unsupervised feature selection, such as filter, wrapper, and embedded methods, are implemented to select the most important features with the most intrinsic information. However, they face challenges due to the sheer volume of ICD and ATC codes and the hierarchical structures of these systems.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to compare several unsupervised feature selection methods for ICD and ATC code databases of patients with coronary artery disease in different aspects of performance and complexity and select the best set of features representing these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: We compared several unsupervised feature selection methods for 2 ICD and 1 ATC code databases of 51,506 patients with coronary artery disease in Alberta, Canada. Specifically, we used the Laplacian score, unsupervised feature selection for multicluster data, autoencoder-inspired unsupervised feature selection, principal feature analysis, and concrete autoencoders with and without ICD or ATC tree weight adjustment to select the 100 best features from over 9000 ICD and 2000 ATC codes. We assessed the selected features based on their ability to reconstruct the initial feature space and predict 90-day mortality following discharge. We also compared the complexity of the selected features by mean code level in the ICD or ATC tree and the interpretability of the features in the mortality prediction task using Shapley analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: In feature space reconstruction and mortality prediction, the concrete autoencoder-based methods outperformed other techniques. Particularly, a weight-adjusted concrete autoencoder variant demonstrated improved reconstruction accuracy and significant predictive performance enhancement, confirmed by DeLong and McNemar tests (P<.05). Concrete autoencoders preferred more general codes, and they consistently reconstructed all features accurately. Additionally, features selected by weight-adjusted concrete autoencoders yielded higher Shapley values in mortality prediction than most alternatives.
    UNASSIGNED: This study scrutinized 5 feature selection methods in ICD and ATC code data sets in an unsupervised context. Our findings underscore the superiority of the concrete autoencoder method in selecting salient features that represent the entire data set, offering a potential asset for subsequent machine learning research. We also present a novel weight adjustment approach for the concrete autoencoders specifically tailored for ICD and ATC code data sets to enhance the generalizability and interpretability of the selected features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: ICD-11 implementation will start in early 2022 in WHO member countries, including Russia. This process should be preceded not only by the official translation and wide distribution of ICD-11 statistical classification and diagnostic guidelines but also by clinicians\' training. For recent years ICD-11 development and innovations in the diagnosis of mental disorders were in the focus of attention of mental health professionals in all over the world.
    UNASSIGNED: This online survey aimed to identify the current views of the Russian psychiatric community on the upcoming implementation of ICD-11.
    UNASSIGNED: A survey was composed in a Google form and circulated through the website of the Russian Society of Psychiatrists and other professional networks. Statistical and narrative analysis was provided. The sample was represented by 148 psychiatrists working in inpatient or outpatient clinical settings.
    UNASSIGNED: Expectations for the classification of mental disorders reported by the respondents were wider than the current purpose of ICD-10. In general, the Russian psychiatrists expressed their interests to forthcoming ICD-11 implementation. Positive attitudes to ICD-11 innovations were associated with the familiarity with the ICD-11 draft. Conservative or negative views were related to longer years of clinical experience. Early carrier psychiatrists were more practically oriented than \'old school\' clinicians.
    UNASSIGNED: This survey may help to promote the ICD-11 by focusing on its advantages for clinical practice and develop targeted training programs.
    UNASSIGNED: Ожидается, что внедрение МКБ-11 начнется с 2022 года в странах-членах ВОЗ, включая Россию. Этот процесс предполагает не только официальный перевод статистической классификации и диагностических указаниях МКБ-11, но и соответствующую подготовку клиницистов. В последние годы разработка МКБ-11 и нововведения для диагностики психических расстройств находились в центре внимания специалистов в области психического здоровья во всем мире.
    UNASSIGNED: Данный онлайн-опрос был проведен с целью выявления ожиданий и установок представителей российского психиатрического сообщества в преддверии внедрения МКБ-11.
    UNASSIGNED: Опрос был составлен в Google форме и распространен через сайт Российского общества психиатров и другие профессиональные сети. Был проведен статистический и нарративный анализ ответов респондентов. Выборка была представлена 148 психиатрами, работающими в стационарных или амбулаторных клинических условиях.
    UNASSIGNED: Ожидания в отношении классификации психических расстройств, о которых сообщили респонденты, были шире, чем те цели, для которых они используют МКБ-10 в своей повседневной практике. В целом российские психиатры выразили свою заинтересованность новой версией МКБ-11. Позитивное отношение к нововведениям МКБ-11 было связано со степенью осведомленности с данным проектом. Консервативные взгляды или негативное отношение были чаще типичны для специалистов с более длительным клиническим опытом. Психиатры, начинающие свою профессиональную карьеру, были более ориентированы на практическое использование новой версии МКБ, чем клиницисты \"старой школы\".
    UNASSIGNED: Результаты опроса, отражающие распространенные мнения и взгляды отечественных клиницистов, могут быть полезны для продвижения МКБ-11. Прежде всего потребуется широкое ознакомление профессионального психиатрического сообщества с новыми указаниями данной классификации для диагностики психических расстройств, и привлечение внимания к ее преимуществам для применения в клинической практике. Важное значение имеет также разработка целевых обучающих программ с учетом разной степени готовности к вводимым изменениям.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: In order to assess the specifics of practical use of the ICD-10 Diagnostic Guidelines by Russian psychiatrists, official national statistics on the prevalence of a number of mental disorders in Russia in 2019 were compared with the results of meta-analyses of international epidemiological studies of these disorders. In addition, a number of items in the online psychiatrists\' survey, relating to the diagnosis of schizophrenia, were analysed; 807 Russian psychiatrists took part in the online survey.
    UNASSIGNED: Analysis of national statistics showed that domestic clinicians diagnose some mental disorders significantly less often than might be expected, according to data obtained by international epidemiological studies. The number of cases of bipolar affective disorder registered in Russia is 90-150 times less than that for the prevalence of this disorder, according to meta-analyses of epidemiological studies; for depression, the result is 50-70 times; for anxiety disorders, the number is 25-50 times, and for autism, it is 30 times. Instead of the above disorders, diagnoses of organic non-psychotic mental disorders and schizophrenia might have been used unreasonably often. Between 2005 and 2019, diagnosis of childhood autism changed significantly (an increase of more than 100%), while the frequency of diagnosing other mental disorders remained unchanged. The results of the online survey also showed largely perfunctory use of the ICD-10 Diagnostic Guidelines, with a third of respondents reporting never checking the diagnostic schedules, and another third doing so from time to time. In addition, the low estimates given by survey participants regarding practical utility of the ICD-10 Diagnostic Guidelines, along with a large percentage of respondents who do not directly use diagnostic criteria in their work, indicate the need to improve the clinical usefulness of the diagnostic guidelines in the latest revision of the ICD, including convenience of use in practice.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of analysis of the Russian national mental health service statistic indicate that at least some diagnostic categories are not used by Russian psychiatrists exactly as ICD-10 suggests. The revealed discrepancy between the principles of diagnostics observed by domestic clinicians and international criteria may interfere with the use of evidence-based treatment algorithms, negatively affecting the quality of psychiatric care. In light of the upcoming transition to ICD-11 and in order to unify approaches to the diagnosis of mental disorders in our country, it is necessary to update and improve educational programmes for psychiatrists.
    UNASSIGNED: С целью оценить особенности практического использования российскими психиатрами диагностических руководств к МКБ-10 было проведено сопоставление официальной государственной статистики о распространенности ряда психических расстройств в России в 2019 г. с результатами мета-анализов международных эпидемиологических исследований данных расстройств. Дополнительно проведен анализ ряда пунктов онлайн-опроса психиатров о диагностике шизофрении. В онлайн-опросе принимало участие 807 российских психиатров.
    UNASSIGNED: Анализ данных государственной статистики показывает, что отечественные клиницисты диагностируют некоторые психические расстройства существенно реже, чем этого следовало бы ожидать, исходя из данных международных эпидемиологических исследований. Так, количество зарегистрированных в России случаев биполярного аффективного расстройства в 90-150 раз меньше, чем распространенность этого расстройства по данными мета-анализов эпидемиологических исследований; депрессии – в 50-70 раз; тревожных расстройств – в 25-50 раз, аутизма – в 30 раз. Вместо этих расстройств неоправданно часто могут использоваться диагнозы органических непсихотических психических расстройств и шизофрении. За период 2005-2019 гг. существенно изменилась диагностика детского аутизма (рост более, чем на 100%), тогда как частоты диагностики других психических расстройств остались без существенных изменений. Результаты онлайн опроса также продемонстрировали во многом формальное использование диагностических руководств к МКБ-10: треть респондентов никогда не сверяется с диагностическими перечнями, треть – делает это время от времени. Кроме того, низкая оценка участниками опроса утилитарных свойств диагностического руководства к МКБ-10 и большой процент респондентов, которые не используют непосредственно диагностические критерии в своей работе, указывают на необходимость улучшения клинической полезности диагностического руководства новой версии МКБ, включая удобство его практического использования.
    UNASSIGNED: Результаты анализа статистики российской государственной психиатрической службы свидетельствуют о том, что как минимум ряд диагностических категорий российские психиатры используются не совсем так, как предполагает МКБ-10. Выявленное несоответствие принципов диагностики, проводимой отечественными клиницистами, современным международным критериям может мешать применению доказательных алгоритмов терапии, негативно влияя на качество психиатрической помощи. В свете грядущего перехода к МКБ-11 и с целью унификации подходов к диагностике психических расстройств в нашей стране, необходимо обновление и усовершенствование образовательных программ для психиатров.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用来自两个ED的数据。773例SARS-CoV-2患者的科室,ICD-10代码来自全科医生-总结护理记录(GP-SCR)和急诊科(ED。)对记录进行了代码差异分析,以及这是否与死亡率增加有关。GP-SCR和ED中ICD-10代码的平均数。死亡患者的记录高于存活患者(所有p<.0001).预先存在的GP数字数据比ED入院时手动收集的数据提供了更好的死亡率预测。ED中遗漏了高达78.47%的GP-SCR代码。记录和高达45.49%的ED。记录代码不在GP-SCR中。缺失的ICD-10代码的子集被确定为能够预测结果;随着缺失代码比例的增加,死亡率呈上升趋势。使GP-SCR可用于更广泛的医疗保健社区的举措应改善患者护理并减少基于机器学习的算法开发过程中的偏见。
    Using data from two ED. departments of 773 patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2, ICD-10 codes derived from the General Practitioner - Summary Care Record (GP-SCR) and Emergency Department (ED.) records were analysed for code discrepancies and whether this related to increased mortality. The average number of ICD-10 codes in both GP-SCR and ED. records was higher for patients who died than patients who survived (all p < .0001). Pre-existing GP digital data provides a better prediction of mortality than data collected manually during admission clerking in the ED. Up to 78.47% of GP-SCR codes were missed in the ED. records and up to 45.49% of the ED. record codes were not in the GP-SCR. A subset of missed ICD-10 codes were identified as being able to predict outcome; a trend towards increasing death rate as the proportion of missed codes increases. Initiatives to make the GP-SCR available to the wider healthcare community should improve patient care and reduce bias during development of machine learning based algorithms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:来自行政登记处的出院诊断经常用于癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞的研究,但识别此类事件的国际疾病分类(ICD)代码的有效性尚不清楚.
    方法:使用丹麦国家患者登记处的患者样本,我们计算了阳性预测值(PPV),即,注册ICD代码的比例,这可以在手动搜索电子健康记录后确认。在影像学证实的静脉血栓栓塞但不了解其ICD编码状态的患者样本中估计敏感性。敏感度计算为这些患者的比例,出院的患者有静脉血栓栓塞ICD编码。
    结果:ICD-10诊断为癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞的总PPV为75.9%(95%置信区间71.3-80.0)。在子组中,复发性静脉血栓栓塞的PPV特别低(44.2%),诊断为次要位置(55.7%),门诊诊断(65.3%),以及手术时给出的诊断(66.7%),急诊病房(48.4%),或通过临终关怀/姑息治疗小组(0%)。总体敏感度为68%,意味着32%的在医院诊断为静脉血栓栓塞症的癌症患者在没有任何静脉血栓栓塞症注册ICD代码的情况下出院.
    结论:在丹麦患者登记册中,ICD诊断癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞的阳性预测值总体上足以用于研究目的。但在亚组之间有显著差异。敏感性有限,1/3的静脉血栓栓塞症患者出院,无相关ICD编码。有必要根据基于行政登记的数据对癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞的发生率进行谨慎的解释。
    BACKGROUND: Hospital discharge diagnoses from administrative registries are frequently used in studies of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, but the validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying such events is unknown.
    METHODS: Using patient samples from the Danish National Patient Register, we calculated positive predictive values (PPV), i.e., the proportion of registered ICD codes, which could be confirmed after manual search of the electronic health record. Sensitivity was estimated in a sample of patients with imaging-verified venous thromboembolism but without prior knowledge about their ICD coding status. Sensitivity was calculated as the proportion of these patients, who were discharged with an ICD code for venous thromboembolism.
    RESULTS: The overall PPV of an ICD-10 diagnosis of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism was 75.9 % (95 % confidence interval 71.3-80.0). In subgroups, the PPV was particularly low for recurrent venous thromboembolism (44.2 %), diagnoses in a secondary position (55.7 %), outpatient diagnoses (65.3 %), and diagnoses given at surgical (66.7 %), emergency wards (48.4 %), or via hospices/palliative teams (0 %). The overall sensitivity was 68 %, meaning 32 % of patients with cancer diagnosed in hospital with venous thromboembolism were discharged without any registered ICD code for venous thromboembolism.
    CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive value of an ICD diagnosis of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the Danish Patient Register was overall adequate for research purposes, but with notable variation across subgroups. Sensitivity was limited, as 1/3 of patients with venous thromboembolism were discharged without any relevant ICD code. Cautious interpretation of incidence of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism based on administrative register-based data is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鉴于干预指南的变化和主动脉瘤血管内治疗的日益普及,我们检查了腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的入院和修复趋势,胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA),和胸主动脉瘤(TAA)。
    方法:我们确定了2004-2019年间在全国住院患者样本(NIS)中所有主动脉瘤破裂和完整主动脉瘤修复的患者。然后我们检查了开放的利用,血管内,和复杂的血管内修复(OAR,EVAR,cEVAR)用于每个主动脉瘤位置(AAA,TAAA,TAA),除了他们导致的住院死亡率,随着时间的推移。cEVAR包括分支,开窗的,和医生改良的内移植物。
    结果:715,570例患者被确定为AAA(87%完整修复,13%破裂-入学)。2004年至2019年期间,完整的AAA修复和破裂的AAA接纳率均显着下降(完整的41,060-34,215,p<.01;破裂的7,175-4,625,p=.02)。在给定年份完成的所有AAA维修中,EVAR的使用增加(2004-2019年:完整的45%-66%,p<.01;破裂10%-55%,p<0.01)以及cEVAR(2010-2019年:完好无损0%-23%,p<.01;破裂0%-14%,p<.01)。完整AAAsEVAR后死亡率显著下降29%(2004-2019年,0.73%-0.52%,p<0.01),而OAR后的死亡率显着增加了16%(2004-2019年,4.4%-5.1%,p<.01)。在研究中,27,443例患者被确定为TAAA(80%完整,20%破裂)。在同一时期,完整的TAAA修复呈上升趋势(2004-2019年1,435-1,640,p=.055),cEVAR成为最常见的方法(2004-2019年,3.8%-72%,p=.055)。141,651名患者被确定为上升,拱门,或下降的TAA(90%完整,10%破裂)。完整的TAA维修大幅增加(2004-2019年4380-10855,p<0.01)。从2017年至2019年,下降的TAA的OAR后死亡率增加,TEVAR后死亡率下降(2017年至2019年:OAR1.6%-3.1%;TEVAR5.2%-3.8%)。
    结论:在2004年至2019年期间,完整的AAA修复和破裂的AAA入院率均显着下降。使用血管内技术修复所有主动脉瘤位置,既完整又破裂,在过去的二十年里增加了。最近在2019年,89%的完整AAAs修复,肾下通过肾上,血管内(EVAR或cEVAR,分别)。仅cEVAR一项就从十年前的0%上升到2019年完整AAA修复的23%。在这个创新时期,有许多新的选择来修复主动脉瘤,同时保持动脉分支,目前,血管内修复术已用于所有完整的主动脉瘤修复术中的大多数。需要长期数据来评估这些程序的持久性。
    BACKGROUND: Given changes in intervention guidelines and the growing popularity of endovascular treatment for aortic aneurysms, we examined the trends in admissions and repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs), and thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs).
    METHODS: We identified all patients admitted with ruptured aortic aneurysms and intact aortic aneurysms repaired in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2004 and 2019. We then examined the use of open, endovascular, and complex endovascular repair (OAR, EVAR, and cEVAR) for each aortic aneurysm location (AAA, TAAA, and TAA), alongside their resulting in-hospital mortality, over time. cEVAR included branched, fenestrated, and physician-modified endografts.
    RESULTS: 715,570 patients were identified with AAA (87% intact repairs and 13% rupture admissions). Both intact AAA repairs and ruptured AAA admissions decreased significantly between 2004 and 2019 (intact 41,060-34,215, P < .01; ruptured 7175-4625, P = .02). Of all AAA repairs performed in a given year, the use of EVAR increased (2004-2019: intact 45%-66%, P < .01; ruptured 10%-55%, P < .01) as well as cEVAR (2010-2019: intact 0%-23%, P < .01; ruptured 0%-14%, P < .01). Mortality after EVAR of intact AAAs decreased significantly by 29% (2004-2019, 0.73%-0.52%, P < .01), whereas mortality after OAR increased significantly by 16% (2004-2019, 4.4%-5.1%, P < .01). In the study, 27,443 patients were identified with TAAA (80% intact and 20% ruptured). In the same period, intact TAAA repairs trended upward (2004-2019, 1435-1640, P = .055), and cEVAR became the most common approach (2004-2019, 3.8%-72%, P = .055). A total of 141,651 patients were identified with ascending, arch, or descending TAAs (90% intact and 10% ruptured). Intact TAA repairs increased significantly (2004-2019, 4380-10,855, P < .01). From 2017 to 2019, the mortality after OAR of descending TAAs increased and mortality after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair decreased (2017-2019, OAR 1.6%-3.1%; thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair 5.2%-3.8%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Both intact AAA repairs and ruptured AAA admissions significantly decreased between 2004 and 2019. The use of endovascular techniques for the repair of all aortic aneurysm locations, both intact and ruptured, increased over the past two decades. Most recently in 2019, 89% of intact AAA repairs, infrarenal through suprarenal, were endovascular (EVAR or cEVAR, respectively). cEVAR alone increased to 23% of intact AAA repairs in 2019, from 0% a decade earlier. In this period of innovation, with many new options to repair aortic aneurysms while maintaining arterial branches, endovascular repair is now used for the majority of all intact aortic aneurysm repairs. Long-term data are needed to evaluate the durability of these procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨SNOMEDCT与ICD-11基金会在两个方向上进行绘图的可行性和挑战,SNOMEDInternational和世界卫生组织在2021年9月至2022年8月之间进行了试点测绘项目。
    方法:第1阶段绘制了内分泌疾病一章中的ICD-11基金会实体,排除恶性肿瘤,SNOMEDCT在第2阶段,SNOMEDCT概念与第1阶段ICD-11实体涵盖的概念等效,已映射到ICD-11基金会。目标是确定ICD-11基金会实体与SNOMEDCT概念之间的等效性。后协调用于映射到ICD-11。每张地图都独立做了两次,结果进行了比较,和差异被调和。
    结果:在第一阶段,637个ICD-11基金会实体中有59%在SNOMEDCT中完全匹配。在第2阶段,1893年SNOMEDCT概念中有32%在ICD-11基金会中完全匹配,协调后增加了15%的完全匹配。遇到的挑战包括非同义词,粒度不匹配,复合条件,和剩余类别。
    结论:这个试点项目揭示了在两个编码系统之间创建地图所需的巨大努力,并揭示了一些共同的挑战。SNOMED国际和世卫组织未来的合作工作可能会受益于其调查结果。建议这两个组织应明确映射的目标和用例,提供足够的资源,制定路线图,并重新考虑他们最初提出的将SNOMEDCT纳入ICD-11基金会本体的建议。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and challenges of mapping between SNOMED CT and the ICD-11 Foundation in both directions, SNOMED International and the World Health Organization conducted a pilot mapping project between September 2021 and August 2022.
    METHODS: Phase 1 mapped ICD-11 Foundation entities from the endocrine diseases chapter, excluding malignant neoplasms, to SNOMED CT. In phase 2, SNOMED CT concepts equivalent to those covered by the ICD-11 entities in phase 1 were mapped to the ICD-11 Foundation. The goal was to identify equivalence between an ICD-11 Foundation entity and a SNOMED CT concept. Postcoordination was used for mapping to ICD-11. Each map was done twice independently, the results were compared, and discrepancies were reconciled.
    RESULTS: In phase 1, 59% of 637 ICD-11 Foundation entities had an exact match in SNOMED CT. In phase 2, 32% of 1893 SNOMED CT concepts had an exact match in the ICD-11 Foundation, and postcoordination added 15% of exact match. Challenges encountered included non-synonymous synonyms, mismatch in granularity, composite conditions, and residual categories.
    CONCLUSIONS: This pilot project shed light on the tremendous amount of effort required to create a map between the 2 coding systems and uncovered some common challenges. Future collaborative work between SNOMED International and WHO will likely benefit from its findings. It is recommended that the 2 organizations should clarify goals and use cases of mapping, provide adequate resources, set up a road map, and reconsider their original proposal of incorporating SNOMED CT into the ICD-11 Foundation ontology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临床分类软件精炼(CCSR)是一种工具,它将成千上万的国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)诊断代码分为大约500个有临床意义的类别,简化分析。然而,CCSR是为在美国使用而开发的,可能无法与其他特定国家的ICD-10编码系统良好合作。
    方法:我们在2010年4月1日至2020年12月31日期间,使用7家医院成人入院的出院诊断,开发了加拿大ICD-10代码(ICD-10-CA)与CCSR类别的半自动匹配算法,并手动验证了结果。然后,我们从2017年到2018年在丹麦的住院医院中对我们的方法进行了外部验证。
    结果:有383,972名加拿大住院患者,有5,186个不同的ICD-10-CA诊断代码,1,855,837名丹麦患者有4,612个ICD-10诊断代码。只有46.6%的加拿大代码和49.4%的丹麦代码可以使用官方CCSR工具直接分类。我们的算法促进了所有加拿大代码的98.5%和丹麦代码的97.7%的映射。临床医生对我们算法的验证证明了出色的准确性(在加拿大和丹麦数据中为97.1%和97.0%,分别)。没有我们的算法,许多常见条件与CCSR类别不直接匹配,如96.6%的住院患者为心力衰竭。
    结论:GEMINICCSR匹配算法(在https://github.com/GEMINI-Medicine/gemini-ccsr上作为开源软件包提供)与原始CCSR工具相比,改进了将加拿大和丹麦ICD-10代码分类为临床连贯类别。我们希望这种方法能够很好地推广到其他国家,并实现广泛的研究和质量测量应用。
    BACKGROUND: The Clinical Classification Software Refined (CCSR) is a tool that groups many thousands of International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes into approximately 500 clinically meaningful categories, simplifying analyses. However, CCSR was developed for use in the United States and may not work well with other country-specific ICD-10 coding systems.
    METHODS: We developed an algorithm for semi-automated matching of Canadian ICD-10 codes (ICD-10-CA) to CCSR categories using discharge diagnoses from adult admissions at 7 hospitals between Apr 1, 2010 and Dec 31, 2020, and manually validated the results. We then externally validated our approach using inpatient hospital encounters in Denmark from 2017 to 2018.
    RESULTS: There were 383,972 Canadian hospital admissions with 5,186 distinct ICD-10-CA diagnosis codes and 1,855,837 Danish encounters with 4,612 ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Only 46.6% of Canadian codes and 49.4% of Danish codes could be directly categorized using the official CCSR tool. Our algorithm facilitated the mapping of 98.5% of all Canadian codes and 97.7% of Danish codes. Validation of our algorithm by clinicians demonstrated excellent accuracy (97.1% and 97.0% in Canadian and Danish data, respectively). Without our algorithm, many common conditions did not match directly to a CCSR category, such as 96.6% of hospital admissions for heart failure.
    CONCLUSIONS: The GEMINI CCSR matching algorithm (available as an open-source package at https://github.com/GEMINI-Medicine/gemini-ccsr) improves the categorization of Canadian and Danish ICD-10 codes into clinically coherent categories compared to the original CCSR tool. We expect this approach to generalize well to other countries and enable a wide range of research and quality measurement applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据健康问题的性质,定义为补充和替代医学/医疗保健(CAM)的服务在不同程度上被使用,和肌肉骨骼疾病,特别是,经常导致CAM的使用。慢性疼痛经常被认为是使用CAM的原因,这也是背痛患者接受专科护理的主要症状。然而,以前的研究在检查CAM的使用时没有考虑背痛的异质性.因此,本研究旨在探讨CAM使用与临床发现之间的关联。在这种情况下的ICD-10诊断代码。
    方法:在一项横断面研究中,一项logistic回归分析检查了公共门诊脊柱科使用CAM和临床发现之间的关联.卡方检验检查了自我报告的CAM使用原因与诊断组之间的关联。
    结果:在研究人群中的432名患者中,23.8%的人在临床评估前12个月内报告使用CAM。CAM的使用与女性和年轻有关。寻找CAM与临床表现或诊断无关,并且没有描述寻找CAM的原因与诊断组之间的统计学显著关联.
    结论:在接受背痛专科护理的患者中,这项研究没有提供证据表明脊柱疾病应该导致CAM的使用.只有个人的人口统计结果,特别是年龄和性别,与CAM使用相关。
    OBJECTIVE: The services defined as complementary and alternative medicine/healthcare (CAM) are used to varying degrees according to the nature of the health problem, and musculoskeletal disorders, in particular, often lead to the use of CAM. Chronic pain is often cited as a reason for using CAM, and it is also the cardinal symptom of patients with back pain referred for specialist care. However, previous studies do not consider the heterogeneity of back pain when examining the use of CAM. Thus, this study aimed to explore the associations between CAM use and clinical findings incl. ICD-10 diagnostic codes in such a context.
    METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a logistic regression analysis examined associations between CAM use and clinical findings at a public outpatient spine department. Chi-squared test examined the association between self-reported reasons for CAM use and the diagnostic groups.
    RESULTS: Of the 432 patients in the study population, 23.8% reported using CAM within 12 months prior to clinical assessment. CAM use was associated with being female and of younger age. Seeking CAM was not associated with clinical findings nor diagnosis, and no statistically significant association between the reasons for seeking CAM and the diagnostic groups was described.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients referred to specialist care for back pain, this study provides no evidence that the spinal condition should be expected to lead to the use of CAM. Only the individual demographic findings, specifically age and gender, were associated with CAM use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然临床编码旨在成为一种客观和标准化的实践,重要的是要认识到情况并非完全如此。从死亡事件到进入研究数据集的病例的临床和官僚实践是分析和解释这些数据的重要背景。实践的变化可能会在两个不同阶段影响最终编码记录的准确性:死亡证明的报告,以及该证书的国际疾病分类(第10版;ICD-10)编码。
    方法:这项研究调查了2000年至2017年间苏格兰哮喘学习医疗保健系统数据集中记录的91,022例死亡。通过在任何位置存在任何ICD-10代码J45或J46来鉴定哮喘相关死亡。这些代码被分类为与哮喘发作有关(哮喘状态;J46)或通常与哮喘诊断有关(J45)。
    结果:我们发现每200例死亡中就有1例与哮喘相关。少于1%的哮喘相关死亡率记录同时使用J45和J46ICD-10编码作为病因。当J45是主要编码原因时,感染(主要是肺炎)更常见的是死亡原因。与J46相比,J46特别表示哮喘发作。
    结论:进一步检查患者病史对于验证记录为哮喘引起的死亡至关重要。并确定可能错误记录的非哮喘死亡,特别是那些有复杂合并症的人。
    BACKGROUND: While clinical coding is intended to be an objective and standardized practice, it is important to recognize that it is not entirely the case. The clinical and bureaucratic practices from event of death to a case being entered into a research dataset are important context for analysing and interpreting this data. Variation in practices can influence the accuracy of the final coded record in two different stages: the reporting of the death certificate, and the International Classification of Diseases (Version 10; ICD-10) coding of that certificate.
    METHODS: This study investigated 91,022 deaths recorded in the Scottish Asthma Learning Healthcare System dataset between 2000 and 2017. Asthma-related deaths were identified by the presence of any of ICD-10 codes J45 or J46, in any position. These codes were categorized either as relating to asthma attacks specifically (status asthmatic; J46) or generally to asthma diagnosis (J45).
    RESULTS: We found that one in every 200 deaths in this were coded as being asthma related. Less than 1% of asthma-related mortality records used both J45 and J46 ICD-10 codes as causes. Infection (predominantly pneumonia) was more commonly reported as a contributing cause of death when J45 was the primary coded cause, compared to J46, which specifically denotes asthma attacks.
    CONCLUSIONS: Further inspection of patient history can be essential to validate deaths recorded as caused by asthma, and to identify potentially mis-recorded non-asthma deaths, particularly in those with complex comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号