BACKGROUND: Pyloroplasty is an effective surgery for gastroparesis. However, some patients fail to improve after pyloric drainage and may require subsequent gastric electric stimulation. There is a paucity of data on the efficacy of gastric stimulator as an adjunct to failed pyloroplasty. This study aimed to describe our experience with pyloroplasty, determine the efficacy of gastric-stimulator for failed pyloroplasty, and compare the final outcomes of those who required pyloroplasty with and without gastric stimulator for gastroparesis.
METHODS: Records of patients who underwent primary pyloroplasty for gastroparesis at our institution were reviewed. Patients with poor symptomatic improvement after pyloroplasty underwent subsequent gastric-stimulator. Symptoms were assessed using the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) preoperatively and after each surgery. Severe gastroparesis was defined as GSCI total score ≥3. Outcomes were assessed after pyloroplasty in all patients and after stimulator in patients who failed pyloroplasty. Final outcomes were then compared between those who did and did not require adjunct gastric-stimulator.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 104 patients (89.4% female) with a mean (SD) age of 42.2(11) and BMI of 26.9(7). Gastroparesis etiologies were 71.2% idiopathic, 17.3% diabetic, and 11.5% postsurgical. At 18.7(12) months after pyloroplasty there was a decrease in the GCSI total score [3.5(1) to 2.7(1.2), p=0.0012] and the rate of severe gastroparesis (71.9% to 29.3%, p<0.0001). Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) 4-hr retention decreased [36.5(24) to 15.3(18), p=0.0003]. Adjunct gastric-stimulator was required by 30 (28.8%) patients due to suboptimal outcomes with no improvement in GCSI (p=0.201) or GES (p=0.320). These patients were younger [40.5(10.6) vs 49.6(15.2), p=0.0016)], with higher baseline GSCI-Total scores [4.3(0.7)-vs-3.7(1.1), p<0.001] and more severe gastroparesis (100%-vs-55.6%, p<0.001). All other preoperative characteristics were similar. At 21.7(15) months after gastric-stimulator there was improvement in GCSI [4.1(0.7) to 2.6(1.1), p<0.0001], severe gastroparesis (100% to 33.3%, p<0.0001), and GES 4-hr retention [21.2(22) to 7.6(10), p=0.054]. Prior to gastric stimulator, those who failed pyloroplasty had significantly worse GCSI (p=0.0009) and GES (p=0.048). However, after gastric stimulator, GCSI and GES improved, and were comparable to those who only required pyloroplasty (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Pyloroplasty improved gastroparesis symptoms and gastric emptying, yet 28% failed, requiring gastric stimulator. Younger patients and those with preoperative GCSI scores ≥3 were more likely to fail. Gastric stimulator improved outcomes after failed pyloroplasty, with comparable final GCSI and GES to those who did not fail.

UNASSIGNED: Gastroparesis that is refractory to standard dietary and medical management may benefit from surgical treatment with gastric electrical neurostimulation, which has shown promise in reducing symptoms of the disease. Pyloroplasty may serve an adjunctive role to a gastric stimulator, but the precise benefit remains unclear. The present study compares reported rates of symptom improvement following gastric neurostimulator implantation with and without pyloroplasty.
UNASSIGNED: A single center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who received operative management for symptom refractory gastroparesis from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 was performed. Subjects were assigned to cohorts based on treatment with gastric electrical stimulation alone (GES-only) or combined with pyloroplasty (GES + PP). A survey-based assessment was administered post-operatively that evaluated cardinal symptoms of gastroparesis (nausea, vomiting, early satiety) before and after treatment.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 42 patients (15 GES-only, 27 GES + PP) were included in the study. Both groups reported a high degree of improvement in global symptom control following surgery (93% vs 81%) with no differences between treatment cohorts (p = 0.09). Early satiety demonstrated better improvement in patients who received gastric stimulation alone (p = 0.012). Subgroup analysis of diabetic gastroparesis patients showed a 2.2% decrease in hemoglobin A1c levels in the GES + PP group (p-0.034).
UNASSIGNED: Symptom reduction in refractory gastroparesis appears to improve after placement of a gastric neurostimulator with or without the addition of a pyloroplasty procedure.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) represents one of the most common medical complications of pregnancy and is important to the well-being of both mothers and offspring in the short and long term. Lifestyle intervention remains the mainstay for the management of GDM. The efficacy of nutritional approaches (e.g. calorie restriction and small frequent meals) to improving the maternal-neonatal outcomes of GDM was attested to by Chinese population data, discussed in two articles in recent issues of this journal. However, a specific focus on the relevance of postprandial glycaemic control was lacking. Postprandial rather than fasting hyperglycaemia often represents the predominant manifestation of disordered glucose homeostasis in Chinese women with GDM. There is now increasing appreciation that the rate of gastric emptying, which controls the delivery of nutrients for digestion and absorption in the small intestine, is a key determinant of postprandial glycaemia in both health, type 1 and 2 diabetes. It remains to be established whether gastric emptying is abnormally rapid in GDM, particularly among Chinese women, thus contributing to a predisposition to postprandial hyperglycaemia, and if so, how this influences the therapeutic response to nutritional interventions. It is essential that we understand the role of gastric emptying in the regulation of postprandial glycaemia during pregnancy and the potential for its modulation by nutritional strategies in order to improve post-prandial glycaemic control in GDM.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are effective in diabetes and obesity, reducing hyperglycemia by increasing insulin release and delaying gastric emptying. However, they can cause gastroparesis, raising concerns about aspiration during procedures. Recent guidelines advise discontinuing GLP-1 RA before surgery to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of GLP-1 RAs on gastric residual contents during endoscopic procedures.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review at BronxCare Health System, New York, from January 2019 to October 2023, assessed gastric residue and aspiration in GLP-1 RA patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Two groups were compared based on dietary status before the procedure. Data included demographics, symptoms of gastroparesis, opiate use, hemoglobin A1c, GLP-1 agonist indication, endoscopic details, and aspiration occurrence. IBM SPSS was used for analysis, calculating means, standard deviations, and applying Pearson\'s chi-square and t-tests for associations, with P < 0.05 as being significant.
RESULTS: During the study, 306 patients were included, with 41.2% on a clear liquid/low residue diet and 58.8% on a regular diet before endoscopy. Most patients (63.1%) were male, with a mean age of 60 ± 12 years. The majority (85.6%) were on GLP-1 RAs for diabetes, and 10.1% reported digestive symptoms before endoscopy. Among those on a clear liquid diet, 1.5% had residual food at endoscopy compared to 10% on a regular diet, which was statistically significant (P = 0.03). Out of 31 patients with digestive symptoms, 13% had residual food, all from the regular diet group (P = 0.130). No complications were reported during or after the procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: The study reflects a significant rise in GLP-1 RA use for diabetes and obesity. A 24-hour liquid diet seems safe for endoscopic procedures without aspiration. Patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms might have a higher residual food risk, though not statistically significant. Further research is needed to assess risks based on diabetes duration, gastroparesis, and GLP-1 RA dosing, aiming to minimize interruptions in therapy during procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) on gastric emptying of, and the glycaemic response to, an oral glucose load in an obese canine model with impaired glucose tolerance.
METHODS: Eleven male dogs were fed a high-fat, high-fructose diet for 7 weeks before receiving BAE, which involved selective embolization of the left gastric artery (n = 5; 14.9 ± 0.8 kg), or the sham (n = 6; 12.6 ± 0.8 kg) procedure. Postprocedural body weight was measured weekly for 4 weeks. Prior to and at 4 weeks postprocedure, a glucose solution containing 13C-acetate was administered orally for evaluation of the gastric half-emptying time (T50) and the glycaemic response. The relationship between the changes in the blood glucose area under the curve over the first 60 minutes (AUC0-60min) and the T50 was also assessed.
RESULTS: At 4 weeks postprocedure, BAE reduced body weight (BAE vs. the sham procedure: -5.7% ± 0.9% vs. 3.5% ± 0.9%, P < .001), slowed gastric emptying (T50 at baseline vs. postprocedure: 75.5 ± 2.0 vs. 82.5 ± 1.8 minutes, P = .021 in the BAE group; 73.8 ± 1.8 vs. 74.3 ± 1.9 minutes in the sham group) and lowered the glycaemic response to oral glucose (AUC0-60min at baseline vs. postprocedure: 99.2 ± 13.7 vs. 67.6 ± 9.8 mmol·min/L, P = .043 in the BAE group; 100.2 ± 13.4 vs. 103.9 ± 14.6 mmol·min/L in the sham group). The change in the glucose AUC0-60min correlated inversely with that of the T50 (r = -0.711; P = .014).
CONCLUSIONS: In a canine model with impaired glucose tolerance, BAE, while reducing body weight, slowed gastric emptying and attenuated the glycaemic response to an oral glucose load.

This study investigates the particle size threshold at which the interdigestive migrating motor complex (IMMC) becomes active in gastric emptying for fasted beagle dogs. Enteric-coated granules containing cetirizine dihydrochloride (CET) were prepared in three particle sizes, 200, 660, and 1,200 µm (D50). To mark IMMC timing and water movement from the stomach, enteric-coated aspirin tablets and acetaminophen solution were used. To six fasted beagle dogs with 50 mL of acetaminophen solution was administered each granule size as a multiple-unit and a single enteric-coated aspirin tablet (3-period crossover study). No significant difference in pharmacokinetic parameters of CET after oral administration of different particle sizes was observed. However, the appearance time of CET in plasma with smaller granules (200 and 660 µm) was significantly faster than that of salicylic acid (a major metabolite of aspirin) in all dogs. In the case of the largest granules (1,200 µm), no significant time difference was observed in the appearance of both compounds in plasma. Furthermore, in two dogs, both compounds appeared at the same time, implying IMMC-regulated gastric emptying for the largest CET granules. These results support a particle size threshold between 660 and 1,200 µm for gastric emptying without IMMC action in fasted beagle dogs.

Postprandial regulation of the gastric emptying (GE) rate plays an important role in food intake. Although oral sweetening with glucose may accelerate GE, the effects of different sweetness intensities of glucose (10% and 20%, w/v) and other energy sweeteners (e.g. fructose and sucrose) remain uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of different glucose concentrations (Experiment 1) and different sugars with the same sweet taste intensity (Experiment 2) on postprandial GE. In both experiments, after ingesting a 200 kcal carbohydrate solution containing 50 g of maltodextrin, participants repeatedly sipped, but did not swallow, one of three (water, 10% and 20%, w/v glucose) or four (water and equally sweet 20%, w/v glucose, 12%, w/v fructose, and 14%, w/v sucrose) solutions for 1 min every 5 min over a 30 min period. GE was evaluated by measuring the temporal change in the cross-sectional area of the gastric antrum using ultrasound. In Experiment 1, oral stimulation with 20% (w/v) glucose resulted in greater GE than the control stimulus (i.e. water), but the effect of stimulation with 10% (w/v) glucose on GE was not different from that of the control stimulus. In Experiment 2, stimulation with 20% (w/v) glucose or 12% (w/v) fructose resulted in greater GE than the control stimulus. However, the effect of stimulation with 14% (w/v) sucrose on GE did not differ from that of the control stimulus. Consequently, oral stimulation with glucose or fructose solutions of moderate to high sweetness following a meal facilitates postprandial GE.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of gut motility in clinical practice is currently limited. A novel medical system (MoPill™) consisting of a capsule that wirelessly transmits radiofrequency signals to assess motility via 3D location, was used to conduct this study. The objectives were to: (1) confirm the safety of the MoPill™ system; (2) compare the 3D location transmitted by the capsule to its location captured by abdominal x-rays; 3 determine gastric emptying (GE), whole gut transit time (WGTT) and segmental transit times.
METHODS: The MoPill™ system consists of an electronic capsule (2 × 1.2 cm), eight color-coded adhesive sensors (6 × 5.5 cm), a recorder (15 × 11 × 2 cm), and software on a laptop. Four sensors were applied to the abdomen and four to the back. Healthy subjects who had fasted overnight ingested a 250-calorie protein bar, 17 oz. of water, followed by an activated capsule. No further caloric contents were permitted for the next 5 h. At 1, 5, and 24 h (if the capsule had not been expelled), upright abdominal X-rays (AP and lateral) were obtained to assess the location of the capsule, which was compared to the gastrointestinal positioning system (GPS) location determined by the MoPill™ system. Identification of the capsule\'s anatomical location by the MoPill™ system was based on (1) the 3D (x, y, z) location; (2) time; (3) trajectory (e.g., going up the right side of the body signified ascending colon); (4) frequency of contractions (e.g., 3 cycles/min for the stomach); and (5) milestone relationship (e.g., pyloric passage must follow the end of gastric contractions). GE was determined first by the end of the 3 cycles/min rhythmic movement of the stomach and then again by pyloric expulsion on 3D location. Small intestine transit was taken as the duration from pyloric expulsion to arrival in the cecum. Colon transit time was determined by calculating the duration from 3D arrival in the cecum to passage of the capsule out of the body (i.e., loss of signal accompanying a bowel movement).
RESULTS: Ten healthy subjects (five women; mean age 34; mean BMI 24) were enrolled, and nine provided reliable data. The variation between the x-ray and the estimated (i.e., identified by the MoPill™ system) location of the capsule was within an average of 3.5 cm (range 0.9-9.4 cm). The mean GE was 3.1 h. The small intestine\'s mean transit time was 4.3 h. The mean colonic transit time was 17.6 h. There were no adverse events recorded during the study.
CONCLUSIONS: MoPill™ is a novel gastrointestinal positional system that accurately identifies the location of a capsule compared to an X-ray. MoPill™ system also recognizes GE, small bowel, colonic, and WGTT as well as segmental gut location and movement characteristics. MoPill™ offers the potential for new insights into GI motility disorders not attainable by current modalities.

BACKGROUND: Gastric sensorimotor disorders (functional dyspepsia [FD] and gastroparesis [GP]) are prevalent and burdensome. Prolonged ambulatory recording using a wireless patch may provide novel information in these patients.
METHODS: Consecutive adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) referred for gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) were eligible for study inclusion. Patients were excluded if they had prior foregut surgery; were taking opioids or other medications known to affect gastric emptying; had a HgbA1C > 10; or were recently hospitalized. Three wireless motility patches were applied to the skin prior to GES. Patients wore the patches for 6 days while recording meals, symptoms, and bowel movements using an iPhone app.
RESULTS: Twenty-three consecutive adults (87% women; mean age = 43.9 years; mean BMI = 26.7 kg/m2) were enrolled. A gastric histogram revealed three levels of gastric myoelectric activity: weak, moderate, and strong. Patients with delayed gastric emptying at 4 h had weak gastric myoelectrical activity. Patients with nausea and vomiting had strong intestinal activity. Those with FD had weak gastric and intestinal myoelectric activity, and a weak meal response in the stomach, intestine, and colon compared to those with nausea alone or vomiting alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FD, and those with delayed gastric emptying, had unique gastrointestinal myoelectrical activity patterns. Reduced postprandial pan-intestinal myoelectric activity may explain the symptoms of FD in some patients. Recording gastrointestinal activity over a prolonged period in the outpatient setting has the potential to identify unique pathophysiologic patterns and meal-related activity that distinguishes patients with distinct gastric sensorimotor disease states.