The association between craniocervical posture and craniofacial structures in the various sagittal skeletal malocclusion during different growth stages has been the focus of intense interest in fields of orthodontics, but it has not been conclusively demonstrated. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the association between craniofacial morphology and craniocervical posture in patients with sagittal skeletal malocclusion during different growth periods. A total of 150 from a large pool of cephalograms qualified for the inclusion and exclusion were evaluated and classified into three groups according to the Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) by examining the morphological modifications of the second through fourth cervical vertebrae, each group consisted of 50 cephalograms. In each growth period, for the comparison of head and cervical posture differences among various skeletal classes, the radiographs were further subdivided into skeletal Class I (0° < ANB < 5°, n = 16), skeletal Class II (ANB ≥ 5°, n = 18), and skeletal Class III (0° ≤ ANB, n = 16) on the basis of their ANB angle. There was no significant difference in gender (P > 0.05). Some variables were found to be significant during pubertal growth and later in patients with sagittal skeletal malocclusion (P < 0.05). Most indicators describing craniocervical posture were largest in skeletal Class II and smallest in skeletal Class III during the peak growth periods and later. Cervical inclination variables were greater in skeletal Class III than in skeletal Class II. Variables of craniofacial morphology and craniocervical posture are more correlated during the pubertal growth period and later in patients with sagittal skeletal malocclusion. A tendency is an indication of the close interrelationship that a more extended head was in skeletal Class II while a flexed head was in skeletal Class III. Nevertheless, with the considerations of some limitations involved in this study, further longitudinal studies with large samples are required to elucidate the relationship clearly.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether facial growth at five years is different for children with a left versus right sided cleft lip and palate.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Seven UK regional cleft centres.
METHODS: Patients born between 2000-2014 with a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).
METHODS: 5-Year-Old\'s Index scores.
RESULTS: 378 children were included. 256 (68%) had a left sided UCLP and 122 (32%) had a right sided UCLP. 5-Year-Old\'s index scores ranged from 1 (good) to 5 (poor). There was a higher proportion of patients getting good scores (1 and 2) in left UCLP (43%) compared to right UCLP (37%) but there was weak evidence for a difference (Adjusted summary odds ratio 1.27, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.87; P = .22).
CONCLUSIONS: Whilst maxillary growth may be different for left versus right sided UCLP, definitive analysis requires older growth indices and arch forms.

暂无摘要。

This longitudinal study aimed to evaluate facial growth and soft tissue changes in infants with complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate (CUCLAP) at ages 3, 9, and 12 months. Using 3D images of 22 CUCLAP infants, average faces and distance maps for the entire face and specific regions were created. Color-coded maps highlighted more significant soft tissue changes from 3 to 9 months than from 9 to 12 months. The first interval showed substantial growth in the entire face, particularly in the forehead, eyes, lower lip, chin, and cheeks (p < 0.001), while the second interval exhibited no significant growth. This study provides insights into facial soft tissue growth in CUCLAP infants during critical developmental stages, emphasizing substantial improvements between 3 and 9 months, mainly in the chin, lower lip, and forehead. However, uneven growth occurred in the upper lip, philtrum, and nostrils throughout both intervals, with an overall decline in growth from 9 to 12 months. These findings underscore the dynamic nature of soft tissue growth in CUCLAP patients, highlighting the need to consider these patterns in treatment planning. Future research should explore the underlying factors and develop customized treatment interventions for enhanced facial aesthetics and function in this population.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence supporting the use of buccal fat pad (BFP) in primary and secondary cleft palate repair and its short- and long- term clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Systematic review conducted by 2 independent reviewers following PRISMA guidelines.
UNASSIGNED: Articles were identified from three databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase and Web of Science). Search terms included \"cleft palate\", \"palatoplasty\", \"palate repair\", \"buccal fat pad\".
METHODS: Use of BFP in primary and secondary cleft palatoplasty.
METHODS: Primary outcomes were immediate postoperative complications, postoperative fistula, and maxillary growth. Secondary outcomes were palatal length, speech, and donor site morbidity.
RESULTS: Ninety-one reports were retrieved after excluding duplicates. Twenty-three studies were included (13 case series and 10 comparative studies). Overall level of evidence was low. Randomized and non-randomized studies had a high risk of bias. In primary palatoplasty, BFP was more frequently used filling lateral relaxing incisions(57.4%), or in the hard-soft palate junction and covering mucosal defects(30.1%). In these patients, post operative fistula incidence was 2.8%. Two studies found wider transverse maxillary dimensions after BFP use. No higher incidence of bleeding, infection, dehiscence, or flap necrosis was reported. In secondary palatoplasty, no recurrent fistulas were reported for patients undergoing BFP for fistula repair.
CONCLUSIONS: BFP appears to be associated with a favorable impact in fistula prevention and management, as well as in transverse maxillary growth. However, there is a high heterogeneity among studies, high risk of bias and overall low quality of evidence. More high-quality research with long-term follow-up is warranted.

UNASSIGNED: Growth measurement has always been essential to identify the best time to employ orthopedic or orthodontic appliances. Optimal timing for orthodontic treatment is strictly linked to the identification of periods of craniofacial growth when treatment is more effective.The aim of this study was to compare two different methods, middle phalanx maturation (MPM) and cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM), used to evaluate the stage of facial growth.
UNASSIGNED: The research data was collected from July 2018 to April 2019 at the Dental Clinic of the San Gerardo Hospital in Monza. The study included a sample of 98 patients-46 males and 52 females. For each patient, a latero-lateral teleradiography of the skull and an X-ray on the middle finger of the right hand were obtained.The statistical analysis of the comparison of the stages of skeletal maturation obtained by the MPM and CVM methods was performed using the correlation coefficient for ranks of Spearman.
UNASSIGNED: A descriptive statistical analysis of the entire sample of 98 patients was performed (mean age of 12.2 years and median of 12.2 years). The average age of females in every single stage of MPM was significantly lower than the average age of males. Of the total sample, 87 patients (88.8%) showed complete agreement between the two methods.
UNASSIGNED: The results obtained from the statistical analysis of this study allowed us to confirm a satisfactory agreement between the two methods.The intermediate phalanx method is a valid and alternative indicator to CVM for the identification of the puberty growth peak. We can, therefore, consider the MPM method a valid indicator of skeletal maturity.
UNASSIGNED: Mirabelli L, Bianco E, Pigato G, et al. Comparison between Two Methods of Skeletal Growth Evaluation: Cervical Vertebrae Maturations and Middle Phalanx Maturation. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(2):327-332.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss advantages, disadvantages and strategical application of anatomical subunit approximation technique in complete unilateral cleft lip repair.
METHODS: Analysis of consecutive 28 cases.
METHODS: A single surgeon experience at a university hospital.
METHODS: Among 77 patients who underwent cleft lip repair between May 5, 2019 and June 30, 2021, 28 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip who received cheiloplasty by author\'s technique.
METHODS: Surgical outcomes were assessed by frontal view medical photographs obtained postoperatively at follow-up visits.
RESULTS: The average length difference between cleft and noncleft sides was <10% for transverse lip length and philtral height. Nostril sill height demonstrated about twenty percent of difference with much variable results. Although the one sample t-test revealed that differences exist between the cleft and noncleft side, they were within an acceptable range.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the strengths and limitations of anatomical subunit approximation technique enabled strategic application in complete unilateral cleft lip repair. Satisfactory outcomes were achieved not only regarding the scar placement but also regarding the symmetry of the lips and augmentation of nasal sill.

UNASSIGNED: The goal of this research was to see how reliable and valid three selected parameters from different analysis were in detecting the vertical skeletal pattern.
UNASSIGNED: There were 94 cephalometric x-rays used in all. The vertical skeletal pattern was assessed using the mandibular plane angle by Steiner, Frankfort mandibular angle by Tweed, and facial axis angle by McNamara. According to the diagnostic results of the majority of the measures, the samples were classified as normo-divergent, hypodivergent, or hyperdivergent. Kappa statistics, positive predictive value, and sensitivity were employed to verify the validity and reliability of the analyses.
UNASSIGNED: A statistically significant weak negative correlation was found between Frankfort mandibular angle and facial axis angle in female group (p value < 0.01). A good agreement was found between mandibular plane angle with final diagnosis (K = 0.726). The mandibular plane angle showed highest sensitivity and positive predictive value in hypodivergent group (0.939, 0.816) and normo-divergent group (0.795, 0.833), respectively.
UNASSIGNED: For determining the facial vertical growth pattern the most accurate indicators were identified to be mandibular plane angle (SN-GoGn) and Frankfort mandibular angle.

This case report demonstrates a rare finding of a pediatric patient with Morning Glory anomaly and Moyamoya Disease with a palatal meningeal hamartoma discovered as a mass within a previously repaired incomplete cleft of the alveolus. Oral meningeal hamartomas are exceedingly rare with only two palatal cases described and none within a cleft palate or alveolus. These findings prompt a review of oral hamartomas with meningeal subclassification. Further discussion describes the relationship of the proposed origins of meningeal hamartomas within the setting of cleft palate development.

The term « adenoid facies » suggests a causal relationship between nasopharyngeal obstruction and facial hyperdivergence in growing subjects. The strength of this association is controversial and few « quantified » values exist.
A rapid electronic search was conducted on PubMed and Embase to find the main cephalometric studies involving patients with nasal/nasopharyngeal obstruction compared to a control sample. A meta-analysis was carried out to quantify the effect of obstruction (1) and intervention to relieve the obstruction (2) on mandibular divergence (SN/Pmand angle), maxillo-mandibular divergence (PP/Pmand angle), inclination of the occlusal plane (SN/Poccl) and the gonial angle (ArGoMe).
Qualitatively, the studies\' bias level ranged from moderate to high. Results were concordant about the significant effect of the obstruction on facial divergence (1) with an increase in SN/Pmand (+3.6° on average, +4.1° in children <6 years), PP/Pmand (+5.4° on average, +7.7° <6 years), ArGoMe (+3.3°) and SN/Pocc (+1.9°). Surgical interventions to remove the respiratory obstacle in children (2) generally did not normalize the direction of growth, with the exception, with a very low level of evidence, of adenoidectomies/adeno-tonsillectomies, performed at an age less than 6-8 years.
Early detection of respiratory obstacles and postural abnormalities associated with oral breathing appears to be decisive in order to hope for management at a young age and normalization of the direction of growth. However, the effects on mandibular divergence remain limited, requiring caution, and cannot be considered a surgical indication.
Le terme « faciès adénoïdien » suggère une relation de causalité entre l’obstruction nasopharyngée et l’hyperdivergence chez le sujet en croissance. La force de cette association est controversée et peu de valeurs « chiffrées » existent.
Une recherche électronique rapide a été menée sur PubMed et Embase pour retrouver les principales études céphalométriques impliquant des patients avec obstruction nasale/nasopharyngée comparés à une population témoin. Une métanalyse a été réalisée pour quantifier l’effet de l’obstruction (1) et de la désobstruction (2) sur la divergence mandibulaire (angle SN/Pmand), la divergence maxillo-mandibulaire (angle PP/Pmand), l’inclinaison du plan occlusal (SN/Poccl) et l’angle goniaque (ArGoMe).
Qualitativement, le niveau de biais des études allait de modéré à élevé. Les résultats étaient concordants sur l’effet significatif de l’obstruction sur la divergence faciale (1) avec une augmentation de SN/Pmand (+3,6° en moyenne, +4,1° chez les enfants < 6 ans), PP/Pmand (+5,4° en moyenne, +7,7° < 6 ans), ArGoMe (+3,3°) et SN/Pocc (+1,9°). Les interventions chirurgicales pour lever l’obstacle respiratoire chez l’enfant (2) ne permettaient généralement pas une normalisation de la direction de croissance, à l’exception, avec un très faible niveau de preuve, des adénoïdectomies/adéno-amygdalectomies, réalisées à un âge inférieur à 6-8 ans.
Le dépistage précoce des obstacles respiratoires et des anomalies posturales associées à la ventilation orale apparaît déterminant pour espérer une prise en charge en jeune âge et une normalisation de la direction de croissance. Les effets sur la divergence mandibulaire restent cependant limités, imposant la prudence et ne constituant pas une indication chirurgicale.