UNASSIGNED: With the increasing use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), there is a need to understand its impact on the occurrence of female malignant tumors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the risk of ovarian cancer associated with HRT and its related risk factors.
UNASSIGNED: PUBMED, OVID, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from 1980 to April 2022 to identify studies on the risk of ovarian cancer and hormone replacement therapy. The random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled risk of HRT in ovarian cancer, both in cohort studies and case-control studies. Additionally, the analysis examined the outcomes associated with different types of estrogen plus progesterone regimens. Meta-regression and sensitive analysis were performed to evaluate the heterogeneity.
UNASSIGNED: 21 cohort studies (involving 15,313 cases and 4,564,785 participants) and 30 case-control studies (including 18,738 cases and 57,747 controls) were analyzed. The pooled risks of ovarian cancer for HRT users were 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.44) from cohort studies and 1.13 (95%CI 1.04-1.22) from case-control studies. However, after restricting the study period to recent decades, the significant results indicating a higher risk disappeared in cohort studies conducted after 2010 and in case-control studies conducted after 2006. Furthermore, the continuous use of estrogen-progesterone replacement therapy (EPRT) was associated with a risk comparable to that of sequential use. Subgroup analysis showed that both estrogen replacement treatment (ERT) and EPRT had minor risks; The risk further increased with prolonged exposure time, particularly for durations exceeding 10 years. Additionally, serous ovarian cancer appeared to be more susceptible than other pathological types.
UNASSIGNED: The risk of ovarian cancer associated with HRT has been decreasing over time. However, ERT may increase this risk, particularly when used for an extended period. It is recommended that long-time users consider continuous EPRT as a safer alternative.
UNASSIGNED: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022321279.

Perimenopausal depression (PMD) is a psychological disorder that occurs in women during perimenopause. In addition to the common clinical symptoms of depression, it often manifests as a perimenopausal complication, and its notable cause is the decline in estrogen levels. Despite numerous studies and trials confirming the benefits of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) for PMD, ERT remains unapproved for treating PMD. Therefore, we conducted a literature search using selected keywords in PubMed and Google Scholar to write a review discussing the feasibility of using ERT for PMD. This review examines the potential of ERT for PMD in terms of its underlying mechanisms, efficacy, safety, and time window. These four aspects suggest that ERT is a viable option for PMD treatment. However, the risk of thrombosis and stroke with ERT is a matter of contention among medical experts, with a paucity of clinical data. Consequently, further clinical trial data are required to ascertain the safety of ERT.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Females represent approximately 70% of the Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) cases and the literature has proposed a connection between the decreased estrogen levels during menopause and an increased AD risk. Previous investigations have predominantly focused on assessing how hormone therapy (HT) affects the likelihood of AD development and cognitive deterioration. However, as the research framework has shifted toward a biomarker-defined AD and alterations in specific biomarkers could take place years before cognitive decline becomes discernible, it is crucial to examine how HT influences AD biomarkers. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of HT on AD biomarker-informed pathophysiology in both cognitively unimpaired (CU) and cognitively impaired (CI) post-menopausal females across the aging and AD spectrum.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included post-menopausal females without HT history (HT-) and with HT (HT+) at the time of PET imaging assessment from two cohorts: the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) cohort, and the Alzheimer\'s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and biofluid collection. Voxel-based t-tests were performed to assess the differences in amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) loads between HT- and HT + females. Linear regression models with interaction terms were also conducted to examine the interactive effects of HT and Aβ-PET on regional tau-PET.
RESULTS: HT + females demonstrated significantly lower tau-PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) in Braak I-II ROIs (P < 0.05, Hedges\' g = 0.73), Braak III-IV ROIs (P < 0.0001, Hedges\' g = 0.74) and Braak V-VI ROIs (P < 0.0001, Hedges\' g = 0.69) compared to HT- females. HT + females also showed significantly lower CSF p-tau181 (P < 0.001) and plasma p-tau181 (P < 0.0001) concentrations. Additionally, results from multivariate linear regression models indicated that HT interacts with cortical Aβ and is associated with lower regional NFT load.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, findings from this observational study suggest that HT is associated with lower tau neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers in postmenopausal females. Due to the close link between tau and cognition, this study highlights the need for large randomized controlled trials designed to systemically study the influences of HT on AD biomarkers and disease progression.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate the association of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use, type, duration and age of commencement with myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke in postmenopausal Korean women.
UNASSIGNED: This nested case-control study used data from the National Health Insurance Service database to analyze 2017 data from women aged ≥50 years and diagnosed with natural menopause between 2004 and 2007. Among 356,160 eligible women, 36,446 used HRT for ≥1 year and 319,714 did not (controls). These two groups were matched 1:1 for statistical analysis. Type and duration were categorized into three categories.
UNASSIGNED: Women who started estrogen-progestogen therapy (EPT) or estrogen therapy (ET) in their 50s, or EPT or tibolone in their ≥60s exhibited a lower stroke risk than controls. MI risk was lower among women who used tibolone - regardless of duration - or EPT or ET for 1-3 years than among controls. Stroke risk was lower with tibolone use for ≥5 years or with EPT or ET use for 1-3 years or ≥5 years than non-users.
UNASSIGNED: Our study may support the beneficial effect of HRT by showing that Korean postmenopausal women who used HRT at a relatively younger and healthier age had a relative benefit for MI and stroke.

Many women seek treatment to improve menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS). The selection of women most likely to benefit from menopause hormone therapy (MHT) is crucial in clinical practice. There is general agreement that women younger than 60 years or who initiate MHT within the first 10 years of menopause, with no contraindications, have greater benefits considering symptomatic relief and additional advantages. This group may have the advantage of protection from osteoporosis and from other chronic diseases that affect postmenopausal women, namely cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cumulating evidence supports MHT for symptomatic women. However, inadequate use according to the needs of symptomatic women led to a burden of suffering worldwide. In recent years, the emergent use of non-regulated body-identical hormones (non-rBHT) can expose patients to potential harms. These hormone preparations are not regulated through the same tests of safety, efficacy or dosing consistency as regulated-BHT (r-BHT). The POESIT (Portugal + Spain + Italy) recommendations highlight the use of 17β-estradiol (E2) and micronized progesterone (P4) as the real r-BHT. In addition, the group emphasizes as an example the data from the REPLENISH study with 1 mg E2/100 mg P4. The combination of the two hormones in one convenient pill showed a clear reduction or elimination of hot flashes and an improvement in sleep quality and, consequently, quality of life. At the same time, this combination has shown high rates of amenorrhea and no significant impact on lipid, glucose or coagulation parameters. Both the REPLENISH study and a real-life retrospective study pointed to the possibility of a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with this formulation than with other combinations.

Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of ultra-low dose estradiol and dydrogesterone (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg) among postmenopausal women. Methods: This pooled analysis of data from three clinical studies assessed the effects of continuous combined ultra-low-dose estradiol and dydrogesterone among postmenopausal women. Participants received E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 13 weeks (double-blind, randomized, European study), E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, randomized, Chinese study), or E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg for 52 weeks (open-label, European study). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs), treatment discontinuation due to a TEAE, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs). Results: Overall, 1027 women were included in the pooled analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, n = 736; placebo, n = 291). Mean treatment exposure was 288.9 days in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group and 86.6 days in the placebo group. The proportion of women experiencing ≥1 TEAE was similar in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and placebo groups (50.1% vs 49.5%, respectively). TESAEs occurred in 12 (1.6%) women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and 9 (3.1%) women receiving placebo. Discontinuation of study treatment was infrequent in both groups (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg: 1.5%; placebo: 2.4%). The occurrence of breast pain was more common in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group than in the placebo group (2.0% vs 0.3%) as was uterine hemorrhage (6.5% vs 2.4%). The incidence of acne, hypertrichoses and weight increased was similar between groups. Conclusions: Across three studies, ultra-low-dose estradiol plus dydrogesterone was well tolerated among postmenopausal women, with no increase in TEAEs or TESAEs compared with placebo.

The number of midlife women transitioning into menopause is substantial, with more than 1 million women in the United States entering menopause each year. Vasomotor symptoms (VMS), mood and sleep disturbances, and sexual problems are common during the menopause transition yet often go untreated. Menopausal hormone therapy is the most effective treatment of VMS, and the benefits typically outweigh the risks for women without contraindications who are younger than 60 years or within 10 years from menopause onset. For women who cannot or choose not to use hormone therapy, nonhormone prescription options exist to treat VMS. Many of these therapies have secondary benefits beyond VMS relief. For example, whereas paroxetine is Food and Drug Administration approved to treat VMS, it can also help with depressive and anxiety symptoms. The aim of this paper is to summarize prescription treatments of VMS and their secondary benefits for other common symptoms experienced by midlife women. The tools presented will help clinicians caring for midlife women provide individualized, comprehensive care with the goal of improving their quality of life during the menopause transition and beyond.

Pyocolpos refers to the buildup of pus within the vaginal cavity. Pyocolpos in the background of lichen sclerosis and postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) has not been previously described. A 69-year-old para 3 patient presented with a history of PMB with a long-standing history of lichen sclerosis. The vaginal examination was impossible due to vaginal adhesions. Vulval appearances revealed the loss of the clitoral architecture. Further imaging revealed an endometrial thickness of 4-5 mm, a focal abnormality within the posterior ectocervix compatible with a hemorrhagic cystic lesion distending the posterior fornix, and some free fluid within the pelvis. A hysteroscopy was abandoned as the vagina was completely obliterated. After a multidisciplinary assessment, the patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy, and the presence of a pyocolpos was noticed at the opening into the vault. We could not find any previous case reports of pyocolpos that are associated with lichen sclerosus. The long-standing history of lichen sclerosus may have caused an obstruction of the outflow tract, which was secondarily infected and slowly progressed into the formation of pyocolpos. Other management options could have been explored if the diagnosis of pyocolpos had been made preoperatively. Pyocolpos should be considered in patients with a history of a long-standing lichen sclerosus who present with abdominal pain and a pelvic mass on imaging.

BACKGROUND: Hormone therapy (HT) use among menopausal women declined after negative information from the 2002 Women\'s Health Initiative (WHI) HT study. The 2017 post-intervention follow-up WHI study revealed that HT did not increase long-term mortality. However, studies on the effects of the updated WHI findings are lacking. Thus, we assessed the impact of the 2017 WHI findings on HT use in Taiwan.
METHODS: We identified 1,869,050 women aged 50-60 years, between June and December 2017, from health insurance claims data to compare HT use in the 3 months preceding and following September 2017. To address the limitations associated with interval-censored data, we employed an emulated repeated cross-sectional design. Using logistic regression analysis, we evaluated the impact of the 2017 WHI study on menopausal symptom-related outpatient visits and HT use. In a scenario analysis, we examined the impact of the 2002 trial on HT use to validate our study design.
RESULTS: Study participants\' baseline characteristics before and after the 2017 WHI study were not significantly different. Logistic regressions demonstrated that the 2017 study had no significant effect on outpatient visits for menopause-related symptoms or HT use among women with outpatient visits. The scenario analysis confirmed the negative impact of the 2002 WHI trial on HT use.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2017 WHI study did not demonstrate any impact on either menopause-related outpatient visits or HT use among middle-aged women in Taiwan. Our emulated cross-sectional study design may be employed in similar population-based policy intervention studies using interval-censored data.