背景:通过智能手机扫描应用程序(SSA)进行的面部扫描越来越多地用于具有成本效益的医疗应用,椅子的方法。然而,缺乏临床验证。这篇综述旨在解决:(1)哪种SSA可以进行面部扫描?(2)哪种SSA可以在临床上使用?(3)哪些SSA已被报道并经过科学验证可用于医疗应用?
方法:在Google上对设计用于面部或物体扫描的SSA进行了技术搜索,苹果AppStore,和GooglePlay商店从2022年8月到2023年12月。文献检索在PubMed上进行,科克伦,EMBASE,MEDLINE,Scopus,IEEEXplore,ACM数字图书馆,Clinicaltrials.gov,ICTRP(WHO)和截至2023年的预印本。资格标准包括英语撰写的科学文章,其中至少包含一种用于临床目的的SSA。SSA选择和数据提取由一名审阅者执行,通过秒验证,第三审稿人因不一致而被咨询。
结果:检索了63个用于三维物体扫描的应用程序,52目前提供面部扫描功能。56篇科学论文,包括两份病例报告,分析了16项概念验证和38项实验研究。13个应用程序(123DCatch,3D造物主,Bellus3D牙科专业版,Bellus3DFace应用程序,Bellus3DFaceMaker,捕获,Heges,Metascan,Polycam,ScandyPro,Scaniverse,Taptap和Trnio)在文献中报道了数字工作流集成,比较或概念验证研究。
结论:52种SSA目前可以进行面部扫描,可用于临床,提供成本效益,便携性和用户友好性。尽管临床验证至关重要,只有13个SSA得到了科学验证,潜在的陷阱和局限性的潜在认识。
BACKGROUND: Facial scanning through smartphone scanning applications (SSA) is increasingly being used for medical applications as cost-effective, chairside method. However, clinical validation is lacking. This review aims to address: (1) Which SSA could perform facial scanning? (2) Which SSA can be clinically used? (3) Which SSA have been reported and scientifically validated for medical applications?
METHODS: Technical search for SSA designed for face or object scanning was conducted on Google, Apple App Store, and Google Play Store from August 2022 to December 2023. Literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, ICTRP (WHO) and preprints up to 2023. Eligibility criteria included English-written scientific articles incorporating at least one SSA for clinical purposes. SSA selection and data extraction were executed by one reviewer, validated by second, with third reviewer being consulted for discordances.
RESULTS: Sixty-three applications designed for three-dimensional object scanning were retrieved, with 52 currently offering facial scanning capabilities. Fifty-six scientific articles, comprising two case reports, 16 proof-of-concepts and 38 experimental studies were analysed. Thirteen applications (123D Catch, 3D Creator, Bellus 3D Dental Pro, Bellus 3D Face app, Bellus 3D Face Maker, Capture, Heges, Metascan, Polycam, Scandy Pro, Scaniverse, Tap tap tap and Trnio) were reported in literature for digital workflow integration, comparison or proof-of-concept studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Fifty-two SSA can perform facial scanning currently and can be used clinically, offering cost-effectiveness, portability and user-friendliness. Although clinical validation is crucial, only 13 SSA were scientifically validated, underlying awareness of potential pitfalls and limitations.