OBJECTIVE: This study aims to overcome challenges in lumbar spine imaging, particularly lumbar spinal stenosis, by developing an automated segmentation model using advanced techniques. Traditional manual measurement and lesion detection methods are limited by subjectivity and inefficiency. The objective is to create an accurate and automated segmentation model that identifies anatomical structures in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging scans.
METHODS: Leveraging a dataset of 539 lumbar spinal stenosis patients, the study utilizes the residual U-Net for semantic segmentation in sagittal and axial lumbar spine magnetic resonance images. The model, trained to recognize specific tissue categories, employs a geometry algorithm for anatomical structure quantification. Validation metrics, like Intersection over Union (IOU) and Dice coefficients, validate the residual U-Net\'s segmentation accuracy. A novel rotation matrix approach is introduced for detecting bulging discs, assessing dural sac compression, and measuring yellow ligament thickness.
RESULTS: The residual U-Net achieves high precision in segmenting lumbar spine structures, with mean IOU values ranging from 0.82 to 0.93 across various tissue categories and views. The automated quantification system provides measurements for intervertebral disc dimensions, dural sac diameter, yellow ligament thickness, and disc hydration. Consistency between training and testing datasets assures the robustness of automated measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: Automated lumbar spine segmentation with residual U-Net and deep learning exhibits high precision in identifying anatomical structures, facilitating efficient quantification in lumbar spinal stenosis cases. The introduction of a rotation matrix enhances lesion detection, promising improved diagnostic accuracy, and supporting treatment decisions for lumbar spinal stenosis patients.

BACKGROUND: The reaserch of artificial intelligence (AI) model for predicting spinal refracture is limited to bone mineral density, X-ray and some conventional laboratory indicators, which has its own limitations. Besides, it lacks specific indicators related to osteoporosis and imaging factors that can better reflect bone quality, such as computed tomography (CT).
OBJECTIVE: To construct a novel predicting model based on bone turn-over markers and CT to identify patients who were more inclined to suffer spine refracture.
METHODS: CT images and clinical information of 383 patients (training set = 240 cases of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), validation set = 63, test set = 80) were retrospectively collected from January 2015 to October 2022 at three medical centers. The U-net model was adopted to automatically segment ROI. Three-dimensional (3D) cropping of all spine regions was used to achieve the final ROI regions including 3D_Full and 3D_RoiOnly. We used the Densenet 121-3D model to model the cropped region and simultaneously build a T-NIPT prediction model. Diagnostics of deep learning models were assessed by constructing ROC curves. We generated calibration curves to assess the calibration performance. Additionally, decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical utility of the predictive models.
RESULTS: The performance of the test model is comparable to its performance on the training set (dice coefficients of 0.798, an mIOU of 0.755, an SA of 0.767, and an OS of 0.017). Univariable and multivariable analysis indicate that T_P1NT was an independent risk factor for refracture. The performance of predicting refractures in different ROI regions showed that 3D_Full model exhibits the highest calibration performance, with a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit (HL) test statistic exceeding 0.05. The analysis of the training and test sets showed that the 3D_Full model, which integrates clinical and deep learning results, demonstrated superior performance with significant improvement (p-value < 0.05) compared to using clinical features independently or using only 3D_RoiOnly.
CONCLUSIONS: T_P1NT was an independent risk factor of refracture. Our 3D-FULL model showed better performance in predicting high-risk population of spine refracture than other models and junior doctors do. This model can be applicable to real-world translation due to its automatic segmentation and detection.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of breast volume is essential in preoperative planning of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) surgery to achieve satisfactory cosmetic outcome. This study introduced a breast volume measurement tool that can be used to perform automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance images (MRI) and calculation of breast volume. We compared the accuracy and reliability of this measurement method with four other conventional modalities.
METHODS: Patients who were scheduled to undergo mastectomy with IBR between 2016 and 2021 were enrolled in the study. Five different breast volume assessments, including automatic segmentation of MRI, manual segmentation of MRI, 3D surface imaging, mammography, and the BREAST-V formula, were used to evaluate different breast volumes. The results were validated using water displacement volumes of the mastectomy specimens.
RESULTS: In this pilot study, a total of 50 female patients met the inclusion criteria and contributed 54 breast specimens to the volumetric analysis. There was a strong linear association between the MRI and water displacement methods (automatic segmentation: r = 0.911, p < 0.001; manual segmentation: r = 0.924, p < 0.001), followed by 3D surface imaging (r = 0.858, p < 0.001), mammography (r = 0.841, p < 0.001), and Breast-V formula (r = 0.838, p < 0.001). Breast volumes measured using automatic and manual segmentation of MRI had lower mean relative errors (30.3% ± 22.0% and 28.9% ± 19.8, respectively) than 3D surface imaging (38.9% ± 31.2), Breast-V formula (44.8% ± 25.8), and mammography (60.3% ± 37.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast volume assessment using the MRI methods had better accuracy and reliability than the other methods used in our study. Breast volume measurement using automatic segmentation of MRI could be more efficient compared to the conventional methods.

The emergence of 7T clinical MRI technology has sparked our interest in its ability to discern the complex structures of the hand. Our primary objective was to assess the sensory and motor nerve structures of the hand, specifically nerves and Pacinian corpuscles, with the dual purpose of aiding diagnostic endeavors and supporting reconstructive surgical procedures. Ethical approval was obtained to carry out 7T MRI scans on a cohort of volunteers. Four volunteers assumed a prone position, with their hands (N = 8) positioned in a \"superman\" posture. To immobilize and maintain the hand in a strictly horizontal position, it was affixed to a plastic plate. Passive B0 shimming was implemented. Once high-resolution 3D images had been acquired using a multi-transmit head coil, advanced post-processing techniques were used to meticulously delineate the nerve fiber networks and mechanoreceptors. Across all participants, digital nerves were consistently located on the phalanges area, on average, between 2.5 and 3.5 mm beneath the skin, except within flexion folds where the nerve was approximately 1.8 mm from the surface. On the phalanges area, the mean distance from digital nerves to joints was approximately 1.5 mm. The nerves of the fingers were closer to the bone than to the surface of the skin. Furthermore, Pacinian corpuscles exhibited a notable clustering primarily within the metacarpal zone, situated on the palmar aspect. Our study yielded promising results, successfully reconstructing and meticulously describing the anatomy of nerve fibers spanning from the carpus to the digital nerve division, alongside the identification of Pacinian corpuscles, in four healthy volunteers (eight hands).

Radiation therapy has dramatically changed with the advent of computed tomography and intensity modulation. This added complexity to the workflow but allowed for more precise and reproducible treatment. As a result, these advances required the accurate delineation of many more volumes, raising questions about how to delineate them, in a uniform manner across centers. Then, as computing power improved, reverse planning became possible and three-dimensional dose distributions could be generated. Artificial intelligence offers the opportunity to make such workflow more efficient while increasing practice homogeneity. Many artificial intelligence-based tools are being implemented in routine practice to increase efficiency, reduce workload and improve homogeneity of treatments. Data retrieved from this workflow could be combined with clinical data and omic data to develop predictive tools to support clinical decision-making process. Such predictive tools are at the stage of proof-of-concept and need to be explainatory, prospectively validated, and based on large and multicenter cohorts. Nevertheless, they could bridge the gap to personalized radiation oncology, by personalizing oncologic strategies, dose prescriptions to tumor volumes and dose constraints to organs at risk.

UNASSIGNED: Automatic segmentation methods have greatly changed the RadioTherapy (RT) workflow, but still need to be extended to target volumes. In this paper, Deep Learning (DL) models were compared for Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) segmentation in locally advanced cervical cancer, and a novel investigation into failure detection was introduced by utilizing radiomic features.
UNASSIGNED: We trained eight DL models (UNet, VNet, SegResNet, SegResNetVAE) for 2D and 3D segmentation. Ensembling individually trained models during cross-validation generated the final segmentation. To detect failures, binary classifiers were trained using radiomic features extracted from segmented GTVs as inputs, aiming to classify contours based on whether their Dice Similarity Coefficient ( DSC ) < T and DSC ⩾ T . Two distinct cohorts of T2-Weighted (T2W) pre-RT MR images captured in 2D sequences were used: one retrospective cohort consisting of 115 LACC patients from 30 scanners, and the other prospective cohort, comprising 51 patients from 7 scanners, used for testing.
UNASSIGNED: Segmentation by 2D-SegResNet achieved the best DSC, Surface DSC ( SDSC 3 mm ), and 95th Hausdorff Distance (95HD): DSC = 0.72 ± 0.16, SDSC 3 mm =0.66 ± 0.17, and 95HD = 14.6 ± 9.0 mm without missing segmentation ( M =0) on the test cohort. Failure detection could generate precision ( P = 0.88 ), recall ( R = 0.75 ), F1-score ( F = 0.81 ), and accuracy ( A = 0.86 ) using Logistic Regression (LR) classifier on the test cohort with a threshold T = 0.67 on DSC values.
UNASSIGNED: Our study revealed that segmentation accuracy varies slightly among different DL methods, with 2D networks outperforming 3D networks in 2D MRI sequences. Doctors found the time-saving aspect advantageous. The proposed failure detection could guide doctors in sensitive cases.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of constructing new geometric parameters that correlate well with dosimetric parameters.
METHODS: 100 rectal cancer patients were enrolled. The targets were identified manually, while the organs at risk (bladder, small bowel, left and right femoral heads) were segmented both manually and automatically. The radiotherapy plans were optimized according to the automatically contoured organs at risk. Forty cases were randomly selected to establish the relationship between dose and distance for each organ at risk, termed \"dose-distance curves,\" which were then applied to the new geometric parameters. The correlation between these new geometric parameters and dosimetric parameters was analyzed in the remaining 60 test cases.
RESULTS: The \"dose-distance curves\" were similar across the four organs at risk, exhibiting an inverse function shape with a rapid decrease initially and a slower rate at a later stage. The Pearson correlation coefficients of new geometric parameters and dosimetric parameters in the bladder, small intestine, and left and right femur heads were 0.96, 0.97, 0.88, and 0.70, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The new geometric parameters predicated on \"distance from the target\" showed a high correlation with corresponding dosimetric parameters in rectal cancer cases. It is feasible to utilize the new geometric parameters to evaluate the dose deviation attributable to automatic segmentation.

UNASSIGNED: The goal of this study was to explore the reliability and clinical value of fast, accurate automatic segmentation of the aortic root based on a deep learning tool compared with computed tomography angiography.
UNASSIGNED: A deep learning tool for automatic 3-dimensional aortic root reconstruction, the CVPILOT system (TAVIMercy Data Technology Ltd., Nanjing, China), was trained and tested using computed tomography angiography scans collected from 183 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement from January 2021 to December 2022. The quality of the reconstructed models was assessed using validation data sets and evaluated clinically by experts.
UNASSIGNED: The segmentation of the ascending aorta and the left ventricle attained Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.9806/0.9711 and 0.9603/0.9643 for the training and validation sets, respectively. The leaflets had a DSC of 0.8049/0.7931, and the calcification had a DSC of 0.8814/0.8630. After 6 months of application, the system modeling time was reduced to 19.83 s.
UNASSIGNED: For patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the CVPILOT system facilitates clinical workflow. The reliable evaluation quality of the platform indicates broad clinical application prospects in the future.

OBJECTIVE: In patients having naïve glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), this study aims to assess the efficacy of Deep Learning algorithms in automating the segmentation of brain magnetic resonance (MR) images to accurately determine 3D masks for 4 distinct regions: enhanced tumor, peritumoral edema, non-enhanced/necrotic tumor, and total tumor.
METHODS: A 3D U-Net neural network algorithm was developed for semantic segmentation of GBM. The training dataset was manually delineated by a group of expert neuroradiologists on MR images from the Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2021 (BraTS2021) image repository, as ground truth labels for diverse glioma (GBM and low-grade glioma) subregions across four MR sequences (T1w, T1w-contrast enhanced, T2w, and FLAIR) in 1251 patients. The in-house test was performed on 50 GBM patients from our cohort (PerProGlio project). By exploring various hyperparameters, the network\'s performance was optimized, and the most optimal parameter configuration was identified. The assessment of the optimized network\'s performance utilized Dice scores, precision, and sensitivity metrics.
RESULTS: Our adaptation of the 3D U-net with additional residual blocks demonstrated reliable performance on both the BraTS2021 dataset and the in-house PerProGlio cohort, employing only T1w-ce sequences for enhancement and non-enhanced/necrotic tumor models and T1w-ce + T2w + FLAIR for peritumoral edema and total tumor. The mean Dice scores (training and test) were 0.89 and 0.75; 0.75 and 0.64; 0.79 and 0.71; and 0.60 and 0.55, for total tumor, edema, enhanced tumor, and non-enhanced/necrotic tumor, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The results underscore the high precision with which our network can effectively segment GBM tumors and their distinct subregions. The level of accuracy achieved agrees with the coefficients recorded in previous GBM studies. In particular, our approach allows model specialization for each of the different tumor subregions employing only those MR sequences that provide value for segmentation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-based segmentation of the mandibular canal, compared to the conventional manual tracing, implementing implant planning software.
METHODS: Localization of the mandibular canals was performed for 104 randomly selected patients. A localization was performed by three experienced clinicians in order to serve as control. Five tracings were performed: One from a clinician with a moderate experience with a manual tracing (I1), followed by the implementation of an automatic refinement (I2), one manual from a dental student (S1), and one from the experienced clinician, followed by an automatic refinement (E). Subsequently, two fully automatic AI-driven segmentations were performed (A1,A2). The accuracy between each method was measured using root mean square error calculation.
RESULTS: The discrepancy among the models of the mandibular canals, between the experienced clinicians and each investigated method ranged from 0.21 to 7.65 mm with a mean of 3.5 mm RMS error. The analysis of each separate mandibular canal\'s section revealed that mean RMS error was higher in the posterior and anterior loop compared to the middle section. Regarding time efficiency, tracing by experienced users required more time compared to AI-driven segmentation.
CONCLUSIONS: The experience of the clinician had a significant influence on the accuracy of mandibular canal\'s localization. An AI-driven segmentation of the mandibular canal constitutes a time-efficient and reliable procedure for pre-operative implant planning. Nevertheless, AI-based segmentation results should always be verified, as a subsequent manual refinement of the initial segmentation may be required to avoid clinical significant errors.