Arterial hypertension

动脉高血压
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全世界超过15亿人患有动脉高血压。高血压会增加死亡和心血管疾病的风险,如心房颤动和心力衰竭。自主神经系统在高血压的发展和疾病的进展中起着至关重要的作用。虽然生活方式因素,比如肥胖和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停,通过增加交感神经活动来诱发高血压,高血压本身维持自主神经失衡,为心房颤动和心力衰竭提供基质。因此,通过直接靶向或间接治疗合并症来调节自主神经系统,有可能治疗高血压和相关的心房和心室终末器官损害。我们讨论了对高血压和相关心脏终末器官损害的自主神经系统调节的干预措施,包括肾上腺素β受体阻滞,去肾神经支配,颈动脉压力感受器刺激,低水平迷走神经刺激,和神经节丛的消融。总之,文献表明,靶向自主神经系统可能是一种预防高血压患者心房和心室终末器官损害的治疗方法.然而,专门设计用于测试自主神经调节对高血压介导的心脏终末器官损伤的影响的临床试验很少.
    More than 1.5 billion people worldwide have arterial hypertension. Hypertension increases the risks of death and cardiovascular disease, such as atrial fibrillation and heart failure. The autonomic nervous system plays an essential role in hypertension development and disease progression. While lifestyle factors, such as obesity and obstructive sleep apnea, predispose to hypertension by increasing sympathetic activity, hypertension itself maintains the autonomic nervous imbalance, providing the substrate for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Therefore, autonomic nervous system modulation either by direct targeting or indirect treatment of comorbidities has the potential to treat both hypertension and related atrial and ventricular end-organ damage. We discuss interventions for the modulation of the autonomic nervous system for hypertension and related cardiac end-organ damage, including pharmacological adrenergic beta-receptor blockade, renal denervation, carotid baroreceptor stimulation, low-level vagal stimulation, and ablation of ganglionated plexuses. In summary, the literature suggests that targeting the autonomic nervous system potentially represents a therapeutic approach to prevent atrial and ventricular end-organ damage in patients with hypertension. However, clinical trials specifically designed to test the effect of autonomic modulation on hypertension-mediated cardiac end-organ damage are scarce.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective.遗传因素在很大程度上有助于动脉高血压的发展和持续时间。动脉高血压血管紧张素II1型受体基因(AGTR1)的A1166C多态性研究是评估遗传,高血压的发展,和脂肪因子,但它仍然有争议。本研究的目的是根据AGTR1A1166C多态性调查血清脂肪因子水平。方法。共检查了86例高血压患者,通过聚合酶链反应,电泳检测和酶联免疫吸附法测定血清脂肪因子水平,对AGTR1的等位基因A1166C多态性进行了评估。结果。在动脉高血压患者组中,血清脂肪因子(抵抗素,脂联素,和瘦素)水平是在抗厌食激素ghrelin降低的背景下发现的,与AGTR1的AA基因型携带者相比,CC基因型携带者占主导地位。ghrelin的统计学显着降低和血清脂肪因子的增加(抵抗素,脂联素,发现CC基因型携带者与AGTR1的AA基因型携带者相比,瘦素)表明CC基因型携带者可能是我们患者动脉高血压发展的预测因子。Conclusions.ghrelin的统计学显着降低和血清脂肪因子的增加(抵抗素,脂联素,与AGTR1的AA基因型携带者相比,在CC基因型携带者中发现了瘦素),这表明CC基因型携带者是我们患者动脉高血压发展的预测因子。
    Objective. Genetic factors substantially contribute to the development and duration of arterial hypertension. The study of the A1166C polymorphism of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene (AGTR1) in arterial hypertension is an auspicious area for assessing the relationship between heredity, hypertension development, and adipokines, but it still remains debatable. The purpose of the current study was to investigate serum adipokines levels depending on the AGTR1 A1166C polymorphism. Methods. A total of 86 patients with arterial hypertension were examined, who underwent the evaluation of the allelic A1166C polymorphism of AGTR1 by polymerase chain reaction with electrophoretic detection and determination of serum adipokines levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results. In the group of patients with arterial hypertension, a significant increase in serum adipokines (resistin, adiponectin, and leptin) levels was found against the background of a decrease in the antianorexic hormone ghrelin with a predominance of CC genotype carriers compared with AA genotype carriers of the AGTR1. A statistically significant decrease in ghrelin and an increase in serum adipokines (resistin, adiponectin, and leptin) in CC genotype carriers compared with AA genotype carriers of the AGTR1 were found suggesting that CC genotype carriers may be predictors of the development of arterial hypertension in our patients. Conclusions. Statistically significant decrease in ghrelin and increase in serum adipokines (resistin, adiponectin, and leptin) were found in CC genotype carriers compared with AA genotype carriers of the AGTR1, which suggests that carriers of the CC genotype are predictors of the arterial hypertension development in our patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究评估了同时进行的孤立训练(T)或与抗氧化剂N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)结合的训练对自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)心脏重塑和氧化应激的影响。
    方法:将六个月大的男性SHR分为久坐(S,n=12),并发训练(T,n=13),久坐辅以NAC(SNAC,n=13),并同时进行NAC补充培训(TNAC,n=14)组。T和TNAC大鼠每周在跑步机和梯子上训练三次;补充NAC的组在大鼠食物中接受120mg/kg/天的NAC,持续八周。通过分光光度法评估心肌抗氧化酶活性和脂质过氧化氢浓度。NADPH氧化酶亚基Nox2,Nox4,p22phox,通过实时RT-PCR评估p47phox。使用ANOVA和Bonferroni或Kruskal-Wallis和Dunn进行统计分析。
    结果:超声心动图显示TNAC同心重构,特征为相对壁厚增加(S0.40±0.04;T0.39±0.03;SNAC0.40±0.04;TNAC0.43±0.04*;*p<0.05vs.T和SNAC)和舒张后壁厚度(S1.50±0.12;T1.52±0.10;SNAC1.56±0.12;TNAC1.62±0.14*mm;*p<0.05vsT),收缩功能改善(后壁缩短速度:S39.4±5.01;T36.4±2.96;SNAC39.7±3.44;TNAC41.6±3.57*mm/s;*p<0.05vsT)。NAC治疗组心肌脂质过氧化氢浓度较低(S210±48;T182±43;SNAC159±33*;TNAC110±23*#nmol/g组织;*p<0.05vs.S,#p<0.05vs.T和SNAC)。T中Nox2和p22phox表达高于S,p47phox表达低于S[S1.37(0.66-1.66);T0.78(0.61-1.04)*;SNAC1.07(1.01-1.38);TNAC1.06(1.01-1.15)任意单位;*p<0.05vs.S]。NADPH氧化酶亚基在TNAC之间没有差异,SNAC,S组。
    结论:单独补充N-乙酰半胱氨酸可降低未经治疗的自发性高血压大鼠的氧化应激。N-乙酰半胱氨酸和同时运动的组合进一步降低了氧化应激。然而,在未经治疗的自发性高血压大鼠中,较低的氧化应激不能转化为改善的心脏重塑和功能。
    BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effects of concurrent isolated training (T) or training combined with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on cardiac remodeling and oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).
    METHODS: Six-month-old male SHR were divided into sedentary (S, n = 12), concurrent training (T, n = 13), sedentary supplemented with NAC (SNAC, n = 13), and concurrent training with NAC supplementation (TNAC, n = 14) groups. T and TNAC rats were trained three times a week on a treadmill and ladder; NAC supplemented groups received 120 mg/kg/day NAC in rat chow for eight weeks. Myocardial antioxidant enzyme activity and lipid hydroperoxide concentration were assessed by spectrophotometry. Gene expression of NADPH oxidase subunits Nox2, Nox4, p22 phox, and p47 phox was evaluated by real time RT-PCR. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Bonferroni or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn.
    RESULTS: Echocardiogram showed concentric remodeling in TNAC, characterized by increased relative wall thickness (S 0.40 ± 0.04; T 0.39 ± 0.03; SNAC 0.40 ± 0.04; TNAC 0.43 ± 0.04 *; * p < 0.05 vs T and SNAC) and diastolic posterior wall thickness (S 1.50 ± 0.12; T 1.52 ± 0.10; SNAC 1.56 ± 0.12; TNAC 1.62 ± 0.14 * mm; * p < 0.05 vs T), with improved contractile function (posterior wall shortening velocity: S 39.4 ± 5.01; T 36.4 ± 2.96; SNAC 39.7 ± 3.44; TNAC 41.6 ± 3.57 * mm/s; * p < 0.05 vs T). Myocardial lipid hydroperoxide concentration was lower in NAC treated groups (S 210 ± 48; T 182 ± 43; SNAC 159 ± 33 *; TNAC 110 ± 23 *# nmol/g tissue; * p < 0.05 vs S, # p < 0.05 vs T and SNAC). Nox 2 and p22 phox expression was higher and p47 phox lower in T than S [S 1.37 (0.66-1.66); T 0.78 (0.61-1.04) *; SNAC 1.07 (1.01-1.38); TNAC 1.06 (1.01-1.15) arbitrary units; * p < 0.05 vs S]. NADPH oxidase subunits did not differ between TNAC, SNAC, and S groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: N-acetylcysteine supplementation alone reduces oxidative stress in untreated spontaneously hypertensive rats. The combination of N-acetylcysteine and concurrent exercise further decreases oxidative stress. However, the lower oxidative stress does not translate into improved cardiac remodeling and function in untreated spontaneously hypertensive rats.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的研究旨在评估单药丸概念(SPC)在减少心血管(CV)事件方面是否优于多药丸概念(MPC)。全因死亡,和CV患者的费用。
    结果:涵盖2012-2018年的匿名医疗索赔数据,包括高血压患者,血脂异常,在1:1-倾向评分匹配(PSM)后分析以SPC或相同MPC开始药物治疗的CV疾病。具有预定义CV事件的住院,全因死亡率,使用发生率比(IRRs)和连续变量的非参数检验,对25,311例SPC患者和25,311例MPC患者进行了成本研究。SPC的IRR显著较低:卒中(IRR=0.77;95%CI0.67-0.88;p<0.001),短暂性脑缺血发作(IRR=0.61;95%CI0.48-0.78;p<0.001),心肌梗死(IRR=0.76;95%CI0.63-0.90;p=0.0016),冠状动脉疾病(IRR=0.66;95%CI0.57-0.77;p<0.001),心力衰竭(IRR=0.59;95%CI0.54-0.64;p<0.001),急性肾功能衰竭(IRR=0.54;95%CI0.56-0.64;p<0.001),全因住院(IRR=0.72;95%CI0.71-0.74;p<0.001),CV住院(IRR=0.63;95%CI0.57-0.69;p<0.001),和全因死亡率(IRR=0.62;95%CI0.57-0.68;p<0.001)。第一次事件的平均时间和死亡时间也有利于SPC。SPC的平均总成本为4,708€,而不是MPC为5.669€,分别为(MR0.830,p<0.001)。
    结论:SPC与较低的CV事件发生率相关,CV事件的时间,和全因死亡,并且在药物经济学参数方面更优越,因此应成为改善结果和降低医疗保健成本的护理标准。
    OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to assess whether a single pill concept (SPC) is superior to a multi pill concept (MPC) in reducing cardiovascular (CV) events, all-cause death, and costs in CV patients.
    RESULTS: Anonymized medical claims data covering 2012-2018, including patients with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CV diseases who started a drug therapy either as SPC or identical MPC were analyzed after 1:1-Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Hospitalizations with predefined CV events, all-cause mortality, and costs were studied in 25,311 patients with SPC and 25,311 patients with MPC using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and non-parametric tests for continuous variables.IRRs were significantly lower for SPC: stroke (IRR=0.77; 95% CI 0.67-0.88; p<0.001), transitory ischemic attack (IRR=0.61; 95% CI 0.48-0.78; p<0.001), myocardial infarction (IRR=0.76; 95% CI 0.63-0.90; p=0.0016), coronary artery disease (IRR=0.66; 95% CI 0.57-0.77; p<0.001), heart failure (IRR=0.59; 95% CI 0.54-0.64; p<0.001), acute renal failure (IRR=0.54; 95% CI 0.56-0.64; p<0.001), all cause hospitalization (IRR=0.72; 95% CI 0.71-0.74; p<0.001), CV hospitalization (IRR=0.63; 95% CI 0.57-0.69; p<0.001), and all-cause mortality (IRR=0.62; 95% CI 0.57-0.68; p<0.001). Mean time to first events and time to death were also in favor of SPC. Mean total costs were 4,708 € for SPC vs. 5.669 € for MPC, respectively (MR 0.830, p<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: SPC is associated with lower incidence rates of CV events, time to CV events, and all-cause death, and is superior regarding pharmacoeconomic parameters and should therefore become standard of care to improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在研究使用高强度间隔加阻力训练进行为期六周的同时训练对高血压患者血流介导的扩张和脉搏波速度的影响,血压升高,或者血压正常.第二个目标是分析个体间的变异性。
    方法:进行了一项随机对照临床试验,其中60名成年参与者分布在六组中:三个高血压对照组,血压升高,或血压正常和其他三种实验性高血压,血压升高,和血压正常的群体,每个包括n=10个人。参与者接受了为期6周的同时运动干预,使用高强度间隔和每周3次的阻力训练。在干预前后进行血流介导的扩张和脉搏波速度以及次级血管评估。
    结果:高血压运动组表现出流量介导的扩张显着增加(Δ7.7%;p=0.003)和脉搏波速度降低(Δ-1.2ms-1;p<0.0001)。正常血压的运动组也显示流量介导的扩张显着增加(Δ8.4%,p=0.002)。
    结论:使用高强度间隔加阻力训练方案进行为期六周的并发运动,以其临床时间效率为特征,能有效改善内皮功能,正如流量介导的扩张增加所证明的那样,减少动脉僵硬度,脉搏波速度下降。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the effects of a six-week of concurrent training using high-intensity interval plus resistance training on flow-mediated dilation and pulse wave velocity in hypertensive, elevated blood pressure, or normotensive. A secondary goal was to analyze the inter-individual variability.
    METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was executed with 60 adult participants distributed across six groups: three control groups of hypertensive, elevated blood pressure, or normotensive and other three experimental hypertensive, elevated blood pressure, and normotensive groups, each comprising n=10 individuals. Participants underwent a six-week intervention of concurrent exercise using high-intensity interval plus resistance training three-weekly. Flow mediated dilation and pulse wave velocity and secondary vascular assessments were conducted before and after the intervention.
    RESULTS: The hypertensive exercise group exhibited a significant increase in flow mediated dilation (Δ+7.7%; p=0.003) and a reduction in pulse wave velocity (Δ-1.2ms-1; p<0.0001). The normotensive exercise group also showed a significant increase in flow mediated dilation (Δ+8.4%, p=0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: The six-week concurrent exercise using high-intensity interval plus resistance training protocol, characterized by its clinical time-efficiency, was effective in improving endothelial function, as demonstrated by increased flow mediated dilation, and in reducing arterial stiffness, indicated by decreased pulse wave velocity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)经常在老年患者中观察到。主要是患有高血压的女性,肥胖,葡萄糖耐受不良/糖尿病,心房颤动,贫血,冠状动脉疾病,慢性肺病,慢性肾功能不全.在实践中,这些情况代表了我们在日常临床实践中处理的大多数心脏病。出于这个原因,HFpEF病不是作为单一实体存在的,因此,没有找到具体的统一疗法。新的分类尝试仍然没有考虑HF综合征的多方面,而是似乎是对确实无法分类的疾病进行分类的人为尝试。本文的目的是批判性地回顾HFpEF综合征概念的构建,并提出在患者评估和治疗中恢复病理生理学方法。考虑到迄今为止在这一领域进行极其昂贵的试验和研究所付出的巨大经济努力,是时候采取行动并将这些资源转向更具体的病理生理分类和潜在的具体治疗靶点了.
    Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is frequently observed in elderly physically deconditioned subjects, mainly women with hypertension, obesity, glucose intolerance/diabetes, atrial fibrillation, anaemia, coronary artery disease, chronic pulmonary disease, and chronic renal insufficiency. In practice, these conditions represent the majority of cardiac diseases we deal with in our daily clinical practice. For this reason, the HFpEF disease does not exist as a single entity and, as such, no specific unifying therapy could be found. New classification attempts still do not consider the multifaceted aspect of the HF syndrome and appear rather as an artefactual attempt to categorize a condition which is indeed not categorizable. The aim of the present article is to critically review the construction of the concept of the HFpEF syndrome and propose the return of a pathophysiological approach in the evaluation and treatment of patients. Considering the huge economic efforts employed up to date to run awfully expensive trials and research in this field, it is time to call action and redirect such resources towards more specific pathophysiological classifications and potential specific therapeutic targets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管疾病(CVD),包括冠状动脉疾病的广谱术语,中风,高血压,心力衰竭,成为全球医疗保健系统中最重要的压力之一。冠状动脉疾病,由动脉粥样硬化引起,有各种可改变的危险因素,如饮食变化和运动。由于发现这些危险因素与氧化应激和炎症有关,膳食补充维生素在治疗和预防疾病中的作用一直存在争议。具有抗炎和抗氧化特性的各种维生素,研究已经探讨了它们与心血管健康的相关性。因此,这篇叙述性综述探讨和评估了所有补充维生素对CVD患者的益处和风险,并提供了未来的建议.
    Cardiovascular disease (CVD), a broad-spectrum term comprising coronary artery disease, stroke, hypertension, and heart failure, presents as one of the most significant strains on global healthcare systems. Coronary artery disease, caused by atherosclerosis, has various modifiable risk factors such as dietary changes and exercise. Since these risk factors are found to be linked to oxidative stress and inflammations, the dietary supplementation with vitamins\' role in treating and preventing the diseases has been of much debate. With various vitamins having anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties, studies have explored their correlation with cardiovascular health. Therefore, this narrative review explores and evaluates the benefits and risks of all vitamin supplementations in patients with CVD and provides future recommendations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高血压和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)增加心血管风险并恶化患者预后。风险增加的一个早期预测指标是动脉僵硬度的变化。这项研究旨在使用无创光电容积描记术(PPG)方法评估波兰动脉高血压(AH)和/或动脉粥样硬化(AS)患者的动脉僵硬度参数。
    方法:研究组由333名患者组成(高加索人,两性,30-85岁)。根据AH和AS对四组患者进行分析(第I组:无AH或AS的患者,第二组:AH患者,第三组:AS患者,和IV组:AH/AS患者)和,此外,根据性别和SARS-CoV-2感染史。动脉刚度参数,即,反射指数(RI),峰峰值时间(PPT),根据对脉搏波轮廓的分析,用PPG自动计算刚度指数(SI)。
    结果:男性的RI和SI平均值高于女性(p<0.001)。性别之间的舒张压(DBP)也有所不同(p=0.010)。研究组之间的平均SI值不同(p=0.038),AS/AH患者中SI最高,无AH或AS患者中SI最低。在I组和II组中,女性的平均SI值显著低于男性(分别为p=0.006和p<0.001)。在组I和组II中,男性RI的平均值也大于女性(每组p<0.001)。关于COVID-19的历史,在AH患者中,有和没有COVID-19的患者之间只有HR值不同(p=0.012)。在AH患者中,男性的RI和SI值高于女性(p<0.001和p<0.001).另一方面,患有COVID-19的女性AS的SI平均值(9.66m/s±1.61)明显高于患有COVID-19的男性(7.98m/s±1.09)(p=0.045)。
    结论:本研究证实性别对动脉僵硬度参数有显著影响。AH和AS均影响动脉僵硬度。与无COVID-19的高血压患者相比,COVID-19后高血压患者的心率更高。
    BACKGROUND: Hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) increase cardiovascular risk and worsen patients\' prognoses. One early predictor of increased risk is a change in arterial stiffness. This study aimed to evaluate arterial stiffness parameters using the non-invasive photoplethysmography (PPG) method in Polish patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and/or atherosclerosis (AS).
    METHODS: The study group consisted of 333 patients (Caucasians, both sexes, aged 30-85 years old). Patients were analyzed in four groups depending on AH and AS (Group I: patients without AH or AS, Group II: AH patients, Group III: AS patients, and Group IV: AH/AS patients) and, in addition, according to sex and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Arterial stiffness parameters, i.e., reflection index (RI), peak-to-peak time (PPT), and stiffness index (SI) were automatically calculated with PPG based on the analysis of the pulse wave contour.
    RESULTS: Mean values of RI and SI were higher in men than women (p < 0.001 each). Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also differed between sexes (p = 0.010). Mean SI values differed between the study groups (p = 0.038) with the highest SI found in AS/AH patients and the lowest-in patients without AH or AS. The mean SI values were significantly lower in women compared to men in both Group I and Group II (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean values of RI were also greater in men than in women in Group I and Group II (p < 0.001 for each group). Regarding COVID-19 history, only HR values differed between patients with and without COVID-19 in AH patients (p = 0.012). In AH patients, men had higher values of RI and SI compared to women (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). On the other hand, AS women with COVID-19 had significantly greater mean values of SI (9.66 m/s ± 1.61) than men with COVID-19 (7.98 m/s ± 1.09) (p = 0.045).
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirmed that sex had a significant impact on arterial stiffness parameters. Both AH and AS affected arterial stiffness. Heart rate was greater in hypertensive patients after COVID-19 compared to hypertensive patients without COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由国际高血压学会发起的5月测量月(MMM)筛查活动旨在评估高血压的患病率和相关危险因素,以提高和改善人群对高血压(BP)和预防方法的认识。MMM是对18岁及以上男女成年人的横断面调查,他们知情同意参加调查并测量其BP。哈萨克斯坦在2021年首次参加了这项运动。一次测量三次血压,收集心血管危险因素数据.共有来自4个地区的1763名受访者参加了筛选。平均年龄为41±14.4岁;31.5%的参与者被发现患有高血压,其中41.8%的人知道,34.0%的治疗,只有15.8%控制(<140/90mmHg)。年龄和性别组之间发现这些比率存在显着差异。筛查运动证实了哈萨克斯坦人口对高血压和相关危险因素的认识水平较低,并且需要每年进行筛查并实施国家高血压控制计划。
    The May Measurement Month (MMM) screening campaign initiated by the International Society of Hypertension aimed to assess the prevalence of hypertension and associated risk factors to increase and improve population awareness of raised blood pressure (BP) and methods of prevention. The MMM is a cross-sectional survey of adults aged 18 years and over of both sexes who gave informed consent to participate in the survey and to have their BP measured. Kazakhstan participated in the campaign for the first time in 2021. Blood pressure was measured three times on a single occasion, and data on cardiovascular risk factors were collected. A total of 1763 respondents from 4 regions participated in the screening. The mean age was 41 ± 14.4 years; 31.5% of all participants were found to have hypertension, of whom 41.8% were aware, 34.0% on treatment, and only 15.8% controlled (<140/90 mmHg). Significant differences in these rates were found between age and sex groups. The screening campaign confirms low levels of awareness of hypertension and associated risk factors in the population in Kazakhstan and the need for annual screening and implementation of national hypertension control programmes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    收缩压(SBP)的臂间差异(IAD)与较高的心血管风险有关。我们比较了同时和连续记录测量SBP的IAD,并评估两次访问之间的可重复性。143例高血压患者(63.8±9.5岁,51.7%的女性)接受稳定的抗高血压药物治疗和控制,持续时间≥3个月。用自动示波装置同时连续测量双臂血压(BP),两次访问。与连续的SBP相比,同时SBP的IAD显着降低,两者都在第一(3.51±4.1vs.4.40±3.7mmHg;P<.01)和第二次访视(3.62±3.5vs.5.69±5.1mmHg;P<.001)。当SBP的IAD分类为≥10或<10mmHg时,在同时测量和连续测量中,两次访视之间的可重复性均不显著.在同时发生的情况下,左臂和右臂之间的初始优势频率相似(46.2vs.43.3%),并且在连续的右臂中更大(55.2vs.38.5).当同时测量SBP时,两次访问之间的优势持久性显著更高(54.4%vs.45.5%;P<0.01)。我们的研究表明,要定义BP最高的手臂,同时测量是优选的。在治疗和控制的高血压患者中,两次访问之间的初始主导地位的持久性较差,要求我们审查录音的建议,在后续行动中,第一次访问时血压最高。
    The inter-arm difference (IAD) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with higher cardiovascular risk. We compared simultaneous and consecutive recordings in measuring IAD of SBP, and evaluated reproducibility between visits. 143 hypertensive patients (63.8±9.5 years, 51.7% women) treated and controlled with stable antihypertensive medication for a period of ≥3 months were included. Blood pressure (BP) in both arms was measured simultaneously and consecutively with an automatic oscillometric device, in two visits. The IAD of the simultaneous SBP was significantly lower compared to the consecutive one, both in the first (3.51±4.1 vs. 4.40±3.7mmHg; P<.01) and in the second visit (3.62±3.5 vs. 5.69±5.1mmHg; P<.001). When the IAD of SBP was categorized as ≥10 or <10mmHg, the reproducibility between visits was insignificant in both simultaneous measurements and consecutive measurements. The frequency of initial dominance was similar between the left and right arm in simultaneous ones (46.2 vs. 43.3%), and greater in the right arm in consecutive ones (55.2 vs. 38.5). The persistence of dominance between both visits was significantly higher when SBP was measured simultaneously (54.4% vs. 45.5%; P<.01). Our study shows that to define the arm with the highest BP, simultaneous measurements are preferable. In treated and controlled hypertensive patients, the poor persistence of initial dominance between visits requires us to review the recommendation of recording, during follow-up, the BP in the arm where it was highest on the first visit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号