pancreatectomy

胰腺切除术
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胰腺实性假乳头状瘤(SPNP)是一种罕见的实体。在这项研究中,我们介绍了一位20多岁的女性,她接受了两个独立的胰腺肿块的评估。关于成像和活检,尾部病变被认为是神经内分泌肿瘤,身体病变被认为是转移性淋巴结。患者被带到手术室,并接受了远端胰腺切除术和脾切除术。患者的术后过程顺利,并在术后第4天出院回家。病理证实两个肿块与高分化SPNP的诊断一致,没有包括淋巴管或神经周浸润在内的恶性肿瘤征象。或淋巴结受累。
    Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPNP) is a rare entity. In this study, we present a woman in her 20\'s who presented for evaluation of two separate pancreatic masses. On imaging and biopsy, the tail lesion was thought to be a neuroendocrine tumour and the body lesion was thought to be a metastatic lymph node. The patient was brought to the operating room and underwent a distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged home on postoperative day 4. Pathology confirmed both masses were consistent with the diagnosis of well-differentiated SPNP with no signs of malignancy including lymphovascular or perineural invasion, or lymph node involvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较<75岁患者和≥75岁患者因胰头和壶腹周围区肿瘤行胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的术后结局。
    方法:评估了2019年2月至2023年12月在我院接受PD的患者。人口统计,东部肿瘤协作组绩效状态(ECOG-PS)得分,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分,合并症,住院,并发症,并对临床病理特征进行分析。将患者分为<75岁组(A组)和≥75岁组(B组)并进行比较。
    结果:整个队列(n=155)的中位年龄为66岁(IQR=16)。在ECOG-PS和ASA评分方面,A组(n=128)和B组(n=27)之间存在显着差异。两组之间在术后并发症方面没有显着差异。B组的30天死亡率更高(p=0.017)。B组的累积中位生存期为10个月,而A组的中位生存期为28个月,具有统计学上的显著差异(p<0.001)。当根据ECOG-PS对年龄组进行分层时,对于ECOG-PS2-3A组,生存期为15个月;对于ECOG-PS2-3B组,存活了八个月,差异无统计学意义(p=0.628)。
    结论:随着人口老龄化,PD患者的选择不应仅仅基于年龄.这项研究表明,PD对75岁以上的患者是安全的。在老年患者中,在决定候选人是否适合手术时,应考虑表现状况和合并症的优化。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of < 75-year-old patients and ≥ 75-year-old patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic head and periampullary region tumors.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent PD in our hospital between February 2019 and December 2023 were evaluated. Demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scores, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, comorbidities, hospital stays, complications, and clinicopathological features were analyzed. Patients were divided into < 75 years (Group A) and ≥ 75 years (Group B) groups and compared.
    RESULTS: The median age of the entire cohort (n = 155) was 66 years (IQR = 16). There was a significant difference between Group A (n = 128) and Group B (n = 27) regarding the ECOG-PS and ASA scores. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding postoperative complications. The 30-day mortality rate was greater in Group B (p = 0.017). Group B had a cumulative median survival of 10 months, whereas Group A had a median survival of 28 months, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). When age groups were stratified according to ECOG-PS, for ECOG-PS 2-3 Group A, survival was 15 months; for ECOG-PS 2-3 Group B, survival was eight months, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.628).
    CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing aging population, patient selection for PD should not be based solely on age. This study demonstrated that PD is safe for patients older than 75 years. In older patients, performance status and the optimization of comorbidities should be considered when deciding on a candidate\'s suitability for surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究确定了手术前腹部MRI对切除PDAC患者全因死亡率的影响。
    2011年1月至2022年12月在安大略省接受胰腺切除术的所有成人(≥18岁)PDAC患者,加拿大,为这项基于人群的队列研究确定(ICD-O-3代码:C250,C251,C252,C253,C257,C258)。患者人口统计学,合并症,PDAC级,医疗和外科管理,生存数据来自ICES多个链接的省级行政数据库。在控制多个协变量后,比较了有和没有手术前腹部MRI的患者的全因死亡率。
    4579名患者的队列包括2432名男性(53.1%)和2147名女性(46.9%),平均年龄为65.2岁(标准差:11.2岁);2998人(65.5%)死亡,1581人(34.5%)存活。切除术后的中位随访时间为22.4个月(四分位距:10.8-48.8个月),胰腺切除术后中位生存期为25.9个月(95%置信区间[95%CI]:24.8,27.5).接受术前腹部MRI检查的患者的中位生存期为33.1个月(95%CI:30.7,37.2),而其他所有患者的中位生存期为21.1个月(95%CI:19.8,22.6)。共有2354/4579(51.4%)患者接受了术前腹部MRI检查,这与全因死亡率下降17.2%(95%CI:11.0,23.1)有关,调整后的风险比(aHR)为0.828(95%CI:0.769,0.890)。
    术前腹部MRI与接受胰腺切除术的PDAC患者的总生存率提高相关,可能是由于肝转移比CT更好的检测。
    北安大略省学术医学协会(NOAMA)临床创新基金。
    UNASSIGNED: This study determined the impact of pre-operative abdominal MRI on all-cause mortality for patients with resected PDAC.
    UNASSIGNED: All adult (≥18 years) PDAC patients who underwent pancreatectomy between January 2011 and December 2022 in Ontario, Canada, were identified for this population-based cohort study (ICD-O-3 codes: C250, C251, C252, C253, C257, C258). Patient demographics, comorbidities, PDAC stage, medical and surgical management, and survival data were sourced from multiple linked provincial administrative databases at ICES. All-cause mortality was compared between patients with and without a pre-operative abdominal MRI after controlling for multiple covariates.
    UNASSIGNED: A cohort of 4579 patients consisted of 2432 men (53.1%) and 2147 women (46.9%) with a mean age of 65.2 years (standard deviation: 11.2 years); 2998 (65.5%) died while 1581 (34.5%) survived. Median follow-up duration post-resection was 22.4 months (interquartile range: 10.8-48.8 months), and median survival post-pancreatectomy was 25.9 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 24.8, 27.5). Patients who underwent a pre-operative abdominal MRI had a median survival of 33.1 months (95% CI: 30.7, 37.2) compared to 21.1 months (95% CI: 19.8, 22.6) for all others. A total of 2354/4579 (51.4%) patients underwent a pre-operative abdominal MRI, which was associated with a 17.2% (95% CI: 11.0, 23.1) decrease in the rate of all-cause mortality, with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.828 (95% CI: 0.769, 0.890).
    UNASSIGNED: Pre-operative abdominal MRI was associated with improved overall survival for PDAC patients who underwent pancreatectomy, possibly due to better detection of liver metastases than CT.
    UNASSIGNED: Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association (NOAMA) Clinical Innovation Fund.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PNETs)起源于神经内分泌细胞,是一类罕见的异质性肿瘤,发病率越来越高。诊断,分期,治疗,PNETs的预后在很大程度上取决于确定组织学特征和生物学机制。这里,作者提供了诊断检查(生物标志物和成像)的概述,grade,和PNET的分期。作者还探讨了相关的基因突变和分子通路,并描述了有关手术和全身治疗方式的最新指南。
    Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) arise from neuroendocrine cells and are a rare class of heterogenous tumors with increasing incidence. The diagnosis, staging, treatment, and prognosis of PNETs depend heavily on identifying the histologic features and biological mechanisms. Here, the authors provide an overview of the diagnostic workup (biomarkers and imaging), grade, and staging of PNETs. The authors also explore associated genetic mutations and molecular pathways and describe updated guidelines on surgical and systemic treatment modalities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于胰腺手术后乳糜漏(CL)的现有研究主要集中在胰十二指肠切除术上,而缺乏对全胰腺切除术(TP)的研究。本研究旨在探讨CL的潜在危险因素,并建立胰腺肿瘤患者接受TP的预测模型。
    方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年1月至2023年12月在北京协和医院接受TP的90例连续患者。根据纳入标准,79例患者最终纳入以下分析。进行LASSO回归和多变量逻辑回归分析以确定与CL相关的危险因素并构建预测列线图。然后,ROC分析,校正曲线,决策曲线分析(DCA),并进行临床影响曲线(CIC)评估其区分度,准确度,和功效。由于样本量小,我们采用引导重采样方法,重复500次进行验证。最后,我们绘制并分析了CL患者术后引流量的趋势。
    结果:我们发现静脉切除术(OR=4.352,95CI1.404-14.04,P=0.011)是TP后CL的独立危险因素。手术时间延长(OR=1.473,95CI1.015-2.237,P=0.052)也与CL发生率增加有关。我们将这两个因素包括在我们的预测模型中。自举后曲线下面积(AUC)为0.752(95CI0.622-0.874)。校正曲线,DCA和CIC在我们的列线图中显示出很高的准确性和临床益处。在CL患者中,静脉切除组和B级CL组的平均引流量明显较高。
    结论:静脉切除术是TP术后乳糜漏的独立危险因素。在TP期间接受血管切除术的患者应警惕术后CL的发生。然后,我们构建了由静脉切除和手术时间组成的列线图,以预测接受TP的患者发生CL的几率。
    BACKGROUND: Existing research on chyle leak (CL) after pancreatic surgery is mostly focused on pancreaticoduodenectomy and lacks investigation on total pancreatectomy (TP). This study aimed to explore potential risk factors of CL and develop a predictive model for patients with pancreatic tumor undergoing TP.
    METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 90 consecutive patients undergoing TP from January 2015 to December 2023 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. According to the inclusion criteria, 79 patients were finally included in the following analysis. The LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify risk factors associated with CL and construct a predictive nomogram. Then, the ROC analysis, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC) were performed to assess its discrimination, accuracy, and efficacy. Due to the small sample size, we adopted the bootstrap resampling method with 500 repetitions for validation. Lastly, we plotted and analyzed the trend of postoperative drainage volume in CL patients.
    RESULTS: We revealed that venous resection (OR = 4.352, 95%CI 1.404-14.04, P = 0.011) was an independent risk factor for CL after TP. Prolonged operation time (OR = 1.473, 95%CI 1.015-2.237, P = 0.052) was also associated with an increased incidence of CL. We included these two factors in our prediction model. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.752 (95%CI 0.622-0.874) after bootstrap. The calibration curve, DCA and CIC showed great accuracy and clinical benefit of our nomogram. In patients with CL, the mean drainage volume was significantly higher in venous resection group and grade B CL group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Venous resection was an independent risk factor for chyle leak after TP. Patients undergoing vascular resection during TP should be alert for the occurrence of CL after surgery. We then constructed a nomogram consisted of venous resection and operation time to predict the odds of CL in patients undergoing TP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Bevezetés: A posztoperatív pancreasfistula mind proximalis, mind distalis pancreatectomia után a legjelentősebb sebészi szövődménynek számít. A szakirodalomban nincs egyértelműen ajánlott, megbízható módszer ezen probléma kiküszöbölésére, emiatt történnek újítások szerte a világon. Jelen közleményünkben a technikai innovációinkról számolunk be. Anyag és módszerek: 2013. január 1-jétől 2023. november 30-ig terjedő időszakban 205 Whipple-műtétet végeztünk nyitottan, mely során a pancreatojejunalis anastomosist az általunk módosított dohányzacskó-öltéses módszerrel készítettük el. 2019. január 1. és 2023. november 30. között pedig 30 betegnél történt nyitott distalis pancreatectomia, amikor a pancreascsonkot az általunk kifejlesztett technikával, szabad rectus fascia-peritoneum grafttal fedtük, majd azt cirkuláris öltéssel rögzítettük. Közleményünkben ezen két módszerrel elért eredményeket ismertetjük. Eredmények: a demográfiai adatok megfeleltek a betegségnél szokásosnak. A posztoperatív ápolási idő és a transzfúzió igény terén észlelt különbségek tükrözték a kétféle beavatkozás eltérő invazivitását. A releváns pancreasfistula kialakulási rátája kedvező képet mutatott, Whipple-műtét után 7,3% volt, míg distalis pancreatectomát követően nem fejlődött ki. A reoperációs és a halálozási arányok megfeleltek az elvártaknak és korreláltak a műtétek kiterjedtségével. Következtetés: pancreas resectiók utáni komplikációk csökkentésére tett törekvéseink során a módosított dohányzacskó-öltéses pancreatojejunostomia és a pancreascsonk fedésére kidolgozott módszerünk egyaránt kedvező eredményekkel járt.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:目的是探索可切除的最佳新辅助治疗策略,边界线可切除,局部晚期胰腺癌,为临床新辅助治疗方案的制定提供理论依据。
    方法:作者回顾了文献标题和摘要,比较了三种治疗策略(新辅助放化疗,新辅助化疗,和前期手术)在PubMed中,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience从2009年到2023年,估计所有试验中的切除率和总生存期(OS)的风险比(HR)的相对优势比。
    结果:共9项研究,共889名患者纳入分析。治疗方法包括前期手术,新辅助化疗,和新辅助放化疗,然后手术。网络荟萃分析结果表明,与前期手术(HR:0.79,95%CI:0.64-0.98)和新辅助化疗(HR:0.79,95%CI:0.64-0.98)相比,新辅助放化疗后手术是改善可切除和临界可切除胰腺癌(RPC)患者OS的有效方法。此外,新辅助放化疗显著提高了可切除和临界RPC患者的切缘阴性切除率(R0)和病理阴性淋巴结(pN0)率。然而,值得注意的是,新辅助放化疗增加了3级或更高治疗相关不良事件的风险,包括局部晚期胰腺癌患者。
    结论:目前的证据表明,新辅助放化疗后手术是治疗可切除和临界RPC患者的最佳选择。未来研究应重点优化新辅助放化疗方案,以有效提高OS,同时减少不良事件的发生。
    BACKGROUND: The aim was to explore the optimal neoadjuvant therapy strategy for resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the development of new neoadjuvant treatment protocols for clinical use.
    METHODS: The authors reviewed literature titles and abstracts comparing three treatment strategies (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and upfront surgery) in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science from 2009 to 2023 to estimate relative odds ratios for resection rate and hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) in all include trials.
    RESULTS: A total of nine studies involving 889 patients were included in the analysis. The treatment methods included upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. The network meta-analysis results demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery was an effective approach in improving OS for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) patients compared to upfront surgery (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98). Additionally, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly increased the margin negative resection (R0) rate and pathological negative lymph node (pN0) rate in patients with resectable and borderline RPC. However, it is worth noting that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increased the risk of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, including in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the optimal choice for treating patients with resectable and borderline RPC. Future research should focus on optimizing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens to effectively improve OS while reducing the occurrence of adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与目的:胰腺实性假乳头状瘤(SPN),一种主要影响年轻女性的罕见肿瘤,由于影像学和流行病学知识的改善,发病率增加。本研究旨在了解不同干预措施的结果,可能的并发症,和相关的危险因素。材料和方法:本研究回顾性分析了1998年9月至2020年7月期间接受SPN胰腺手术的24例患者。结果:手术干预,通常需要有症状的病例或病理证实,结果良好,5年生存率高达97%.尽管在标准化术前评估和随访方案方面存在挑战,侵袭性完全切除显示有希望的长期生存率和良好的肿瘤结局.值得注意的是,常规手术和微创(MI)手术的围手术期结局无显著差异.预后和位置缺乏组织病理学相关性。在患者中,1例患者术后41个月出现弥漫性肝转移,但化疗和肝动脉化疗栓塞反应良好,术后159个月观察到疾病稳定性。另一位患者在手术后发展为非酒精性脂肪性肝炎,并接受了肝移植,手术后115个月屈服于不良的药物依从性。结论:这些发现强调了手术干预在管理SPN中的重要性,并建议MI方法是一种可行的选择,其结果与常规手术相当。
    Background and Objectives: The pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN), a rare tumor predominantly affecting young women, has seen an increased incidence due to improved imaging and epidemiological knowledge. This study aimed to understand the outcomes of different interventions, possible complications, and associated risk factors. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 24 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for SPNs between September 1998 and July 2020. Results: Surgical intervention, typically required for symptomatic cases or pathological confirmation, yielded favorable outcomes with a 5-year survival rate of up to 97%. Despite challenges in standardizing preoperative evaluation and follow-up protocols, aggressive complete resection showed promising long-term survival and good oncological outcomes. Notably, no significant differences were found between conventional and minimally invasive (MI) surgery in perioperative outcomes. Histopathological correlations were lacking in prognosis and locations. Among the patients, one developed diffuse liver metastases 41 months postoperatively but responded well to chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, with disease stability observed at 159 postoperative months. Another patient developed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis after surgery and underwent liver transplantation, succumbing to poor medication adherence 115 months after surgery. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of surgical intervention in managing SPNs and suggest the MI approach as a viable option with comparable outcomes to conventional surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    获得切缘阴性切除对胰腺实性假乳头状瘤(SPN)的治疗至关重要,在儿科病例中,在远端胰腺切除术期间保留脾脏是非常理想的。当肿瘤累及脾血管使保存复杂化时,腹腔镜Warshaw手术(Lap-WT)是无价的。然而,Lap-WT在儿科患者中的可行性仍存在争议。这项研究介绍了三例接受Lap-WT的小儿SPN病例的临床结果。中位年龄为10岁,中位肿瘤大小为50毫米。Lap-WT显示出成功的结果,中位手术时间为311分钟,失血量为12mL。术后无并发症发生,平均住院时间为8天。长期随访显示2例轻度血小板减少,脾脏体积增大,胃周静脉曲张合二为一,无出血并发症。没有观察到肿瘤复发的实例。Lap-WT成为儿科SPN的可行方法,确保保存脾脏而不损害肿瘤预后。
    Achieving margin-negative resection is crucial in treatment of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas, while preserving the spleen during distal pancreatectomy is highly desirable in pediatric cases. Laparoscopic Warshaw procedure (Lap-WT) is invaluable when tumor involvement in splenic vessels complicates preservation. However, the feasibility of Lap-WT in pediatric patients remains contentious. This study presents the clinical outcomes of three pediatric SPN cases who underwent Lap-WT. The median age was 10 years, with a median tumor size of 50 mm. Lap-WT demonstrated successful outcomes with a median operation time of 311 min and blood loss of 12 mL. No postoperative complications occurred, with a median length of hospital stay of 8 days. Long-term follow-up showed mild thrombocytopenia and increased spleen volume in two cases, perigastric varices in one, with no bleeding complications. No instances of tumor recurrence were observed. Lap-WT emerges as a feasible approach for pediatric SPN, ensuring spleen preservation without compromising oncological outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号