BACKGROUND: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are rare neoplasms, accounting for only 1 %-2 % of all pancreatic tumors, and predominantly affect female patients.
METHODS: The present case report details a patient presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain for 3 days who ultimately received a diagnosis of SPNs in the pancreatic body and tail. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a sizable mass arising from the pancreas, featuring an enhancing cystic component with involvement of the liver and spleen. The patient underwent subsequent exploratory laparotomy, a distal pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and partial hepatectomy. SPN diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology and immunohistochemistry with negative resection margins.
UNASSIGNED: Approximately 70 % of SPN cases are asymptomatic and are incidentally discovered. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, preoperative diagnosis of SPNs remains a clinical challenge. Surgical management with negative resection margins remains the primary treatment approach. The recurrence rate after surgical resection has been reported to be 3 %-9 %. The prognosis for SPNs limited to the pancreas is generally favorable, with a cure rate exceeding 95 % after complete surgical resection.
CONCLUSIONS: An SPN of the pancreas is a rare tumor observed in young female patients. Although it is classified as a malignant tumor, SPN has low malignant potential. Aggressive surgical resection, however, has proven effective in curing SPN for the majority of patients.

OBJECTIVE: Middle segment-preserving pancreatectomy (MSPP) is a relatively new parenchymal-sparing surgery that has been introduced as an alternative to total pancreatectomy (TP) for multicentric benign and borderline pancreatic diseases. To date, only 36 cases have been reported in English.
METHODS: We reviewed 22 published articles on MSPP and reported an additional case.
RESULTS: Our patient was a 49-year-old Japanese man diagnosed with Zollinger-Elison syndrome (ZES) caused by duodenal and pancreatic gastrinoma associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1. We avoided TP and chose MSPP as the operative technique due to his relatively young age. The patient developed a grade B postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), which improved with conservative treatment. He was discharged without further treatment. To date, no tumor has recurred, and pancreatic function seems to be maintained. According to a literature review, the morbidity rate of MSPP is as high as 54%, mainly due to the high incidence of POPF (32%). In contrast, there was no perioperative mortality, and postoperative pancreatic function was comparable to that after conventional pancreatectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high incidence of POPF, MSPP appears to be safe, with low perioperative mortality and good postoperative pancreatic sufficiency.

Pancreatic diabetes is associated with glycemic variability, poor metabolic control, and reduced quality of life. Though hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems were not originally developed for these types of diabetes, they could address the therapeutic challenge. We aimed to evaluate long-term metabolic control in ten adult patients (mean ± SD age: 59 ± 12) treated with HCL insulin delivery systems for pancreatitis or pancreatectomy-induced diabetes. After a median of 346 days (range 64 - 631) with HCL insulin delivery, continuous glucose monitoring showed 59±19 % time-in-range [70-180 mg/dl] (versus 49±24 % before HCL insulin delivery, P = 0. 049) and 0.8 ± 1.0 % time-below-range [< 70 mg/dl] (versus 2.2 ± 2.6 %, P = 0.142), with the coefficient of glucose variability at 35.4 ± 7.6 (versus 37.8 ± 7.1, P = 0.047). HbA1c decreased from 8.5 ± 1.7 % to 7.7 ± 1.3 % [69±18 to 60±14 mmol/mol] (P = 0.076). No patient experienced an acute adverse metabolic event.

UNASSIGNED: Microcystic serous cystadenomas are uncommon, benign neoplasms rarely known to progress to malignancy. They are typically asymptomatic and inadvertently discovered during imaging for another unrelated condition. When discovered, they are commonly found in females over 60 years of age.
UNASSIGNED: In this case report, we examine a unique presentation of a serous cystadenoma discovered when a 19-year-old male presented with symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting.
UNASSIGNED: Previous studies on serous cystadenomas in a younger male demographic are rare. Therefore, this study will provide additional insight into the signs, symptoms, diagnosis, and management of cystadenomas in young patients.

A 75-year-old male developed acute kidney injury KDIGO stage 3 a few weeks after Whipple surgery was performed for a distal cholangiocarcinoma. Kidney biopsy revealed oxalate nephropathy. This was attributed to post-Whipple malabsorption, poor compliance with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and daily intake of vitamin C supplements. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy was resumed and calcium carbonate initiated, with an improvement in glomerular filtration rate. Unfortunately, due to oncological progression, best supportive care was initiated.We review the pathophysiology and conditions predisposing to secondary hyperoxaluria and oxalate nephropathy. This diagnosis should be considered among the main causes of acute kidney injury following pancreatectomy, with important therapeutic implications.

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been covered by insurance since 2016 in Japan, and advance laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been also covered by insurance since 2020 in Japan. It has been reported that laparoscopic pancreatectomy causes few postoperative adhesions in the abdominal cavity and that repeat laparoscopic surgery could be performed. However, in robotic pancreatectomy, there have been no such reports yet. We reported that even after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy, there were few adhesions in the abdominal cavity, and we were able to perform the robotic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the splenic artery and vein. This suggested that robotic surgery was an effective treatment method for repeat pancreatectomy, given its low invasiveness and minimal adhesion.

Pancreas divisum (PD) represents a prevalent congenital pancreatic variant, typically arising from the failure of fusion between the ventral and dorsal pancreatic ducts. This condition is frequently associated with recurrent pancreatitis. We herein present a case involving an incomplete PD diagnosis following the identification of a refractory postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (DP) for pancreatic cancer. A 74-year-old female patient, who had undergone laparoscopic DP for pancreatic cancer, developed a POPF accompanied by intraabdominal bleeding, necessitating urgent intervention radiology to avert life-threatening complications. Following this, intraabdominal drainage was performed through an intraoperative drainage root. Subsequent fistulography and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography unveiled the presence of an incomplete PD for the first time. Consequently, a stent was placed in the Santorini duct. However, the volume of pancreatic juice from the intraabdominal drainage tube exhibited no reduction. Despite repeated attempts to access the pancreatic duct via a guidewire through the drainage tube, these endeavors proved futile. Paradoxically, the removal of the external drainage tube led to a recurrence of intraabdominal abscess formation. Consequently, reinsertion of the drainage tube became imperative. Consideration was given to draining the abscess under endoscopic ultrasonography and performing pancreatic duct drainage. However, due to the diminution of the abscess cavity through the external fistula drainage procedure, coupled with the absence of pancreatic duct dilation and its tortuous course, it was deemed a formidable challenge. the patient necessitated a lifestyle adaptation with a permanently placed percutaneous drainage tube.

Xanthogranulomatous inflammation is a chronic inflammatory reaction microscopically characterized by aggregation of foamy histiocytes, fibrous tissue, and infiltration of various inflammatory cells. In contrast to xanthogranulomatous inflammation in the gallbladder or kidney, xanthogranulomatous pancreatitis is rare. We herein present a case of xanthogranulomatous pancreatitis in a patient who underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy under preoperative suspicion of a pancreatic pseudocyst or pancreatic tumor. A 77-year-old woman with a 1 month history of epigastric pain, anorexia, and general fatigue was admitted to our hospital. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a cystic mass with ill-defined margins at the pancreatic tail together with a splenic abscess. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound detected a hyperechoic cystic lesion at the tail of the pancreas with heterogeneous internal echogenicity, and part of the intra-cystic content was enhanced by the contrast agent. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed a cystic lesion at the tail of the pancreas that continued into the main pancreatic duct, and the main pancreatic duct was slightly narrowed downstream of the cystic lesion. Pancreatic juice cytology revealed suspicious cells, leading to the possibility of intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma. Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy was performed, and the histopathological diagnosis was xanthogranulomatous pancreatitis with no malignant findings.

Exocrine pancreatic carcinomas are rarely reported in dogs. A ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a 10-year-old intact beagle is described in this report. The diagnosis was made based on clinical signs, imaging (abdominal ultrasound and CT scan) and histopathology. Treatment consisted of partial right lobe pancreatectomy followed by adjuvant therapy with toceranib phosphate (Palladia®) and firocoxib (Previcox®) for six months. The treatment was well tolerated, and the survival time was 445 days. To our knowledge, this is the longest survival reported in the literature for a dog diagnosed with exocrine pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The results described here may contribute to provide a better understanding about this neoplasia and potential treatment options.

BACKGROUND: Foreign bodies within the pleura and pancreas are infrequent, and the approaches to their treatment still a subject of debate. There is limited knowledge particularly regarding glass foreign bodies.
METHODS: We present a case involving large glass splinters in the pleura and pancreas, with an unknown entry point. In addition, a systematic review was conducted to explore entry hypotheses and management options.
RESULTS: In addition to our case, our review uncovered eight incidents of intrapleural glass, and another eight cases of glass in other intrathoracic areas. The fragments entered the body through impalement (81%), migrated through the diaphragm after impalement (6%), or caused transesophageal perforation (19%) following ingestion. Eight instances of glass inside the abdominal cavity were documented, with seven resulting from impalement injuries and one from transintestinal migration. There were no recorded instances of glass being discovered within the pancreas. Among the 41 nonglass intrapancreatic foreign bodies found, sewing needles (34%) and fish bones (46%) were the most common; following ingestion, they had migrated through either a transgastric or transduodenal perforation. In all these cases, how the foreign bodies were introduced was often poorly recalled by the patient. Many nonglass foreign bodies tend to become encapsulated by fibrous tissue, rendering them inert, though this is less common with glass. Glass has been reported to migrate through various tissues and cavities, sometimes with a significant delay spanning even decades. There are cases of intrapleural migration of glass causing hemothorax, pneumothorax, and heart and major blood vessels injury. For intrapleural glass fragment management, thoracoscopy proved to be effective in 5 reported cases, in addition to our patient. Most intrapancreatic nonglass foreign bodies tend to trigger pancreatitis and abscess formation, necessitating management ranging from laparoscopic procedures to subtotal pancreatectomy. There have been only four documented cases of intrapancreatic needles that remained asymptomatic with conservative management. There is no direct guidance from the existing literature regarding management of intrapancreatic glass foreign bodies. Consequently, our patient is under observation with regular follow-ups and has remained asymptomatic for the past 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Glass foreign bodies in the pleura are rare, and our report of an intrapancreatic glass fragment is the first of its kind. Impalement is the most likely method of introduction. As glass has significant migration and an ensuing complication potential, preventive removal of intrapleural loose glass should be considered. However, intrapancreatic glass fragment management remains uncertain.