core stability

堆芯稳定性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较躯干屈肌,伸肌,慢性颈部疼痛(CNP)导致中度至重度残疾的女性和无症状女性之间的外侧屈肌耐力。
    方法:观察性病例对照研究。
    方法:纳入30名CNP和颈部残疾指数评分在30%至70%之间的女性和28名无症状女性。视觉模拟量表用于评估休息和活动期间的颈部疼痛强度。为了评估躯干肌肉的耐力,躯干屈肌耐力试验,索伦森测试,并进行了侧桥耐久性试验。
    结果:协方差分析表明,颈部疼痛组的躯干屈肌耐力时间较低,伸肌,和外侧屈肌具有较大的效应大小(p<.001,η2=0.378-0.696)。躯干屈肌耐力时间与休息时颈部疼痛强度呈中度负相关,与颈部残疾评分呈弱负相关(r=-460和-365,p<0.05)。
    结论:由于CNP而导致中度至重度残疾的女性表现出躯干肌肉耐力下降,这可能是下腰痛的诱发因素。此外,躯干屈肌耐力与颈部疼痛有关。一个整体的方法,解决整个脊柱,而不是只关注颈部,可能对管理CNP有用。
    结论:躯干肌耐力降低的发现应考虑在CNP的管理中纳入干预措施,以有效解决疼痛和残疾。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare trunk flexor, extensor, and lateral flexor muscle endurance between women with moderate to severe disability due to chronic neck pain (CNP) and asymptomatic women.
    METHODS: Observational case-control study.
    METHODS: Thirty women with CNP and Neck Disability Index scores ranging from 30% to 70% and 28 asymptomatic women were included. The visual analog scale was used to assess neck pain intensity at rest and during activity. To assess trunk muscles endurance, trunk flexor endurance test, Sorensen test, and side bridge endurance test were performed.
    RESULTS: Analysis of covariance indicated that neck pain group had lower body mass index-adjusted endurance times of trunk flexor, extensor, and lateral flexor muscles with large effect sizes (p < .001, η2 = 0.378-0.696). Trunk flexor endurance time showed a moderately negative correlation with neck pain intensity at rest and a weakly negative correlation with neck disability score (r = -460 and -365, p < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Women with moderate to severe disability due to CNP exhibited decreased trunk muscle endurance, which may be a predisposing factor for low back pain. Also, trunk flexor endurance was related to neck pain complaints. A holistic approach, addressing the entire spine rather than focusing solely on the cervical region, might be useful for managing CNP.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of reduced endurance in trunk muscles should consider incorporating interventions in the management of CNP to effectively address pain and disability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:太极拳(TCC)被认为是中国人的身心实践,被联合国教科文组织视为人类非物质文化遗产,并被世界卫生组织推荐为预防跌倒的治疗方法。
    目的:评估TCC对老年人平衡的影响。
    方法:由两名独立评审员使用ROB2工具对以下数据库中的偏倚风险进行系统评价:PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,PEDro,Embase,科克伦,CINAHL,和LILACS。在2010年至2024年发表的老年人群(65岁以上)中,对动态和静态平衡标准的选定文章进行了荟萃分析。
    结果:18项随机临床试验符合标准。TCC在计时和行走和步态速度测试中改善了动态平衡,在荟萃分析中与对照组相比,单腿测试和功能达到测试中的静态平衡。只有一项研究发现了不良事件,训练参数是异质的。
    结论:TCC可以改善老年人的动态和静态平衡。参数的结果表明,为临床实践开具TCC的方向最小或没有不良反应的风险。
    BACKGROUND: Tai Chi Chuan (TCC) is considered a mind and body practice of Chinese origin, considered as an intangible cultural heritage of humanity by UNESCO, and recommended by the World Health Organization as a therapeutic approach to prevent falls.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of TCC on older adult\'s balance.
    METHODS: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials was conducted by two independent reviewers using the ROB2 tool to assess the risk of bias under the following databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PEDro, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and LILACS. A meta-analysis of the selected articles for the dynamic and static balance criteria was conducted in a population of older adults (over 65 years) with publications from 2010 to 2024.
    RESULTS: Eighteen randomized clinical trials fulfilled the criteria. TCC improves dynamic balance in the timed up and go and gait speeds tests, and static balance in the single-leg test and functional reach test when compared with the control group in the meta-analysis. Adverse events were found in only one study, and the training parameters were heterogeneous.
    CONCLUSIONS: TCC improves older adults with both dynamic and static balance. The results of the parameters indicate a direction in which TCC is prescribed for clinical practice with minimal or no risk of adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非特异性慢性下腰痛(CLBP)主要影响40-80岁女性。体育锻炼是一种主要的治疗形式,功能训练(FT)和双任务训练(DT)由于其独特的特征而成为潜在的方式。然而,关于这些运动方式对CLBP的影响的信息有限。
    目的:比较FT和DT对CLBP老年女性躯干功能和功能适应性的影响。
    方法:这是一项随机临床试验,有两个训练组(FT和DT)和CLBP和非CLBP个体。我们评估了后备箱的稳定性,最大等距强度,躯干肌肉的耐力,以及16周训练前后的功能适应性结果:我们发现循环稳定性和不稳定性仅有时间效应(p<.001),屈肌(p=.006),和伸肌耐力(p<.001)。对于外侧屈肌,与CLBP个体的DT相比,FT侧屈肌耐力平均降低17.3个单位.为了屈肌的强度,与非CLBP相比,CLBP个体表现出69.3单位的增加。为了伸肌的强度,与非CLBP个体相比,CLBP个体减少了75.1个单位。Weidentifiedatimeeffectforallfunctionalfitnessmeasures(p<.050)Conclusion:FTandDTincreasestrunkstability,最大等距强度,躯干肌肉的耐力,除了CLBP老年女性的功能健身意义:专业人士可以选择任何一种训练类型,因为在最初的16周干预中没有差异.
    BACKGROUND: Non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) predominantly affects women aged 40-80 years. Physical exercise is a primary treatment form, with functional training (FT) and dual-task training (DT) emerging as potential modalities due to their distinct characteristics. However, limited information exists regarding the effects of these exercise modalities on CLBP.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the FT and DT effects on trunk function and functional fitness in CLBP older women.
    METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial with two training groups (FT and DT) and CLBP and non-CLBP individuals. We assessed the trunk stability, maximum isometric strength, endurance of trunk muscles, and functional fitness before and after 16 weeks of training RESULTS: We found only time effects for circular stability and instability (p <.001), flexors (p =.006), and extensors endurance (p <.001). For the lateral flexors, there was an average reduction of 17.3 units in lateral flexor endurance in the FT compared to the DT in CLBP individuals. For the strength of the flexor, CLBP individuals exhibited an increase of 69.3 units compared to non-CLBP. For the strength of extensors, CLBP individuals showed a decrease of 75.1 units compared to non-CLBP individuals. We identified a time effect for all functional fitness measures (p <.050) CONCLUSION: FT and DT increase trunk stability, maximum isometric strength, and endurance of trunk muscles, besides the functional fitness of CLBP older women SIGNIFICANCE: Professionals can choose either training type, as there are no differences in the initial 16 weeks of intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有推动器综合征(PS)的患者的特征是由于在空间中缺乏对自己身体的感知而表现出姿势控制改变。当患者积极地用未受影响的四肢向受伤侧推进时,对中线被动拉直的阻力作出反应。10%至50%的中风出现PS。如今,对于PS没有明确的治疗方法。
    目的:设计和验证使用视觉反馈和特定核心稳定性练习(FeViCoS)治疗PS患者的锻炼计划。
    方法:通过专家共识使用德尔菲法进行验证。13名神经康复专家参与了这一过程。使用包含18个Likert类型问题的在线问卷来评估设计的程序。如果在四分位数1和3值之间存在收敛(RIQ=Q1-Q3)或者如果相对四分位数间距(RIR)小于20%,则认为达成共识。通过计算Fleiss\'kappa系数来衡量专家之间的一致程度。
    结果:总共需要2轮才能在100%的参与下达到97.44%的共识。所有问题的RIR小于或等于20%。Fleiss\'kappa指数(0.831)表明专家之间的一致程度非常好。
    结论:神经康复专家认为FeViCoS对PS患者的治疗方法有效。专家共识建议在物理疗法临床实践中采用一种新策略,以改善亚急性中风和PS患者的平衡和姿势取向。
    BACKGROUND: The patient with pusher syndrome (PS) is characterized by showing postural control alterations due to a lack of perception of his own body in the space. It appears when the patient actively pushes with his unaffected limbs towards the injured side, reacting with resistance to passive straightening towards the midline. Between 10% and 50% of strokes present PS. Nowadays, there is no clearly defined treatment for PS.
    OBJECTIVE: To design and validate an exercise program using visual feedback and specific core stability exercises (FeViCoS) for the treatment of patients with PS.
    METHODS: Validation was conducted by expert consensus using the Delphi method. Thirteen neurorehabilitation experts participated in the process. An online questionnaire with 18 Likert-type questions was used to evaluate the designed program. Consensus was considered reached if there was convergence between the quartile 1 and 3 values (RIQ = Q1-Q3) or if the relative interquartile range (RIR) was less than 20%. The degree of agreement between experts was measured by calculating the Fleiss\' kappa coefficient.
    RESULTS: A total of 2 rounds were required to achieve 97.44% consensus with 100% participation. The RIR was less than or equal to 20% for all questions. The Fleiss\' kappa index (0.831) showed that the degree of agreement between experts was excellent.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neurorehabilitation experts considered FeViCoS valid for the therapeutic approach to patients with PS. Expert consensus suggests a novel strategy in physical therapy clinical practice to improve balance and postural orientation in patients with subacute stroke and PS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管指南和系统评价建议使用运动治疗慢性疼痛和颈部疼痛,对于临床上经常使用的保守治疗没有明确的建议.使用被动物理治疗方法支持临床普拉提练习对生物心理社会地位的影响仍然未知。
    目的是研究常规治疗(CT)以及临床普拉提对疼痛水平的影响,身体状况,功能状态,慢性颈痛患者的心理社会地位。
    将50名妇女随机分为2组,临床普拉提小组(普拉提,n=25),以及除临床普拉提外接受CT的组(普拉提CT,n=25)。两组均接受每周3天的治疗,共6周。CT程序涉及热包(HP)应用程序的实施,经皮神经电刺激(TENS),和宫颈区域的治疗性超声(US)。
    除普拉提外,CT在减少视觉模拟量表(在休息和活动期间)方面更有效,颈部残疾指数,恐惧-回避信念问卷,NeckPix秤,医院焦虑抑郁量表,和认知运动疗法方法-生物心理社会问卷得分(p<0.05),以及增加运动范围(ROM)和颈屈肌耐力值的变化程度以及ShortForm-36的能量参数得分(p<0.05)。
    除普拉提外还提供CT更有效地减轻疼痛,残疾,害怕运动,抑郁程度,和阴性的生物心理社会地位和改善延伸ROM和颈屈耐力,颈部意识,以及慢性颈痛患者生活质量的能量/活力参数。
    UNASSIGNED: Although guidelines and systematic reviews recommend the use of exercise in the treatment of chronic pain and neck pain, there are no clear recommendations for conservative treatments frequently used in clinics. The effect of supporting clinical Pilates exercises with passive physiotherapy methods on biopsychosocial status is still unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective was to investigate the effects of conventional treatment (CT) in addition to clinical Pilates on pain levels, physical condition, functional status, and psychosocial status in individuals with chronic neck pain.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty women were randomly divided into 2 groups, the clinical Pilates group (Pilates, n= 25), and the group receiving CT in addition to clinical Pilates (Pilates-CT, n= 25). Both groups received treatment 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The CT program involved the implementation of hot pack (HP) application, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), and therapeutic ultrasound (US) to the cervical area.
    UNASSIGNED: CT in addition to Pilates was more effective in reducing the Visual Analog Scale (at rest and during activity), Neck Disability Index, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, NeckPix Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-depression, and Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach-Biopsychosocial questionnaire scores (p< 0.05) and in increasing the degree of change in the extension range of motion (ROM) and cervical flexor endurance values and scores in the energy parameter of Short Form-36 (p< 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: CT provided in addition to Pilates was more effective in reducing pain levels, disability, fear of movement, depression levels, and negative biopsychosocial status and improving extension ROM and cervical flexor endurance, neck awareness, and the energy/vitality parameter of quality of life in individuals with chronic neck pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腰骶移行椎骨(LSTV)是一种常见的脊柱变体,报告的患病率从8.1%到36%不等。LSTV已被证明可以改变腰骨盆参数并降低全髋关节置换术的益处,但LSTV对髋关节发育的具体影响尚不清楚。因此,这项研究的目的是研究LSTV对髋关节发育改变的影响。
    根据全身计算机断层扫描(CT)成像,将总共310个人分为三组:一组23个骶骨前椎骨(PSV)(n=102),一组腰痛为25PSV(n=108),和24PSV的正常对照组(n=100)。腰骨盆髋关节复合体(LPHC)的定量参数,包括腰椎前凸(LL),骨盆发病率(PI),骨盆倾斜(PT),骶骨斜坡(SS),轴向和矢状髋臼前倾角(AAA),中心边缘(CE)角,锐角,测量和分析股骨颈干角(FNSA)。统计分析用于比较三组之间这些定量参数的差异,并评估髋关节和腰椎-骨盆参数之间的关系。
    仅在矢状AAA中发现了三组中每对与LSTV亚组之间的显着差异(左侧:P=0.008;右侧:P<0.001),没有发现其他参数的差异。与正常组(24PSV)相比,23PSV和25PSV组在矢状AAA中均表现出增加的值,尤其是在23PSV组的右侧。仅矢状AAA与PI(r=0.195-0.429;P=0.001-0.08)和PT(r=0.239-0.605;P=0.001-0.03)的骨盆参数呈低至中度正相关。
    LSTV的变化与通过LPHC传播的髋关节解剖发育相关,并可能降低髋臼矢状覆盖,特别是在右侧的23PSV亚型中。
    UNASSIGNED: Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) is a common spinal variant, with the reported prevalence varying from 8.1% to 36%. LSTV has been shown to alter the lumbo-pelvic parameters and reduce the benefits of total hip arthroplasty, but the specific effects of LSTV on hip development remain unclear. The aim of this study was thus to investigate the impact of LSTV on developmental alterations of the hip.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 310 individuals were categorized into three groups according to whole-body computed tomography (CT) imaging: a group with sacralization of 23 presacral vertebrae (PSV) (n=102), a group with lumbarization of 25 PSV (n=108), and a normal control group with 24 PSV (n=100). Quantitative parameters of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex (LPHC) including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), axial and sagittal acetabular anteversion angle (AAA), center-edge (CE) angle, Sharp angle, and femoral neck-shaft angle (FNSA) were measured and analyzed. Statistical analyses were used to compare the differences of these quantitative parameters among the three groups and to assess the relationship between hip and lumbar-pelvic parameters.
    UNASSIGNED: Significant differences between each pair of three groups and the LSTV subgroups were only found in the sagittal AAA (left side: P=0.008; right side: P<0.001), with no differences found for the other parameters. Compared to the normal group (24 PSV), both the 23 PSV and 25 PSV groups exhibited increased values in the sagittal AAA, especially in the right side of the 23 PSV group. Only the sagittal AAA showed low-to-moderate positive correlations with pelvic parameters of PI (r=0.195-0.429; P=0.001-0.08) and PT (r=0.239-0.605; P=0.001-0.03).
    UNASSIGNED: Variations of LSTV are correlated with the hip anatomical development via LPHC transmission and may potentially reduce the sagittal acetabular coverage, particularly in the 23 PSV subtype on the right side.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:工作场所健康促进(WHP)治疗背痛的项目传统上只关注与工作相关的问题,而不关注脊柱的休闲压力。我们开发了一个全面的WHP项目,该项目涉及医院工作人员的背部健康,无论其工作的身体特征如何,并比较了其对久坐和身体活跃的医院工作人员的影响。
    方法:在参与WHP干预之前和之后6个月进行研究评估。主要结局参数是背痛(Oswestry残疾指数,ODI)。焦虑(广义焦虑症-7),工作能力(工作能力指数),抑郁症(患者健康问卷-9),压力(感知压力量表-10),和生活质量(简表-36)通过问卷作为次要结局参数进行评估.物理性能通过30秒坐立测试(30secSTS)测量。
    结果:68名非特异性背痛的医护人员被纳入WHP项目“BackHealth24/7/365”的评估研究。六个月后,背痛,物理性能,两组的自我感知的身体功能(SF-36身体功能分量表)均显着改善。没有一个参数显示出与组分配的交互作用。
    结论:全面的WHP干预对医院工作人员显示出显著的积极影响,无论其工作的身体特征如何。
    BACKGROUND: Projects for workplace health promotion (WHP) for back pain traditionally focus exclusively on work-related but not on leisure-time stress on the spine. We developed a comprehensive WHP project on the back health of hospital workers regardless of the physical characteristics of their work and compared its effects on sedentary and physically active hospital workers.
    METHODS: Study assessments were carried out before and six months after participation in the WHP intervention. The primary outcome parameter was back pain (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI). Anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), work ability (Work Ability Index), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10), and quality of life (Short Form-36) were assessed via questionnaires as secondary outcome parameters. Physical performance was measured via the 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand test (30secSTS).
    RESULTS: Sixty-eight healthcare workers with non-specific back pain were included in the evaluation study of the WHP project \"Back Health 24/7/365\". After six months, back pain, physical performance, and self-perceived physical functioning (SF-36 Physical Functioning subscale) improved significantly in both groups. Not a single parameter showed an interaction effect with the group allocation.
    CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive WHP-intervention showed significant positive effects on hospital workers regardless of the physical characteristics of their work.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是观察核心稳定训练是否在功能性能测试期间对消防员完成时间起着重要作用。使用受试者内研究设计,其中受试者(n=13,84.6%男性,33.7±7.4岁,91.06±13.29kg,身体脂肪25.79±6.55%,包括7次针对消防员的练习,穿着22.68公斤重的背心模仿典型的消防员装备。在测试会话之间,受试者接受特定的核心稳定训练,每周至少进行3天,共4周.在第一次(300.89±42.11s)和第二次(256.92±34.31s)性能测试之间,完成时间明显更快,平均43.8秒(p<0.001)。在整个研究过程中,体重指数(p=0.065)和测试过程中感知的劳累等级(p=0.084)并未显着降低。足够的健身对消防员的工作任务表现至关重要。这项研究的数据表明,定期进行核心稳定训练可能有助于优化有效性,和潜在的安全,消防员在高强度功能技能方面的表现。
    The purpose of this study was to observe if core stabilization training plays a significant role in firefighter time-to-completion during a functional performance test. A within subjects study design was used in which subjects (n = 13, 84.6% male, 33.7 ± 7.4 years of age, 91.06 ± 13.29 kg, 25.79 ± 6.55 percent body fat, 8.96 ± 7.51 years of firefighting experience) completed two performance tests (pre and post core training), comprised of 7 firefighter-specific exercises performed while wearing a 22.68 kg weight vest to mimic typical firefighter equipment. Between testing sessions, subjects were prescribed specific core stabilization exercises to perform at least three days a week for a total of 4 weeks. Time-to-completion was significantly quicker between the first (300.89 ± 42.11s) and second (256.92 ± 34.31s) performance testing, on average by 43.8 seconds (p < 0.001). Body mass index (p = 0.065) and rating of perceived exertion during testing (p = 0.084) did not significantly decrease across the course of the study. Adequate fitness is essential to firefighters\' job task performance. Data from this study suggests that regular core stabilization training may assist in optimizing the effectiveness, and potentially safety, of firefighters\' performance in high intensity functional skills.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非特异性慢性下腰痛(NSCLBP)是一种普遍的疾病,影响90%的经历下腰痛的个体。核心稳定练习(CSE)是管理NSCLBP最常用的治疗方法。然而,等长型(ISOM)和等渗(ISOT)型CSE在NSCLBP治疗中的优异有效性仍存在不确定性.
    本研究的主要目的是比较ISOM和ISOT锻炼对NSCLBP患者疼痛和残疾的疗效。此外,本研究旨在评估ISOM和ISOT在这些患者中的有效性,并与未对这些变量进行干预相比.
    这项研究是一项随机对照试验,涉及41名男性和女性患有NSCLBP。参与者被随机分为三组:ISOMCSE(n=13),ISOTCSE(n=14),和waitlist控件(n=14)。运动训练在长达8周的时间内每周三次进行40-60分钟。在干预前后测量疼痛(使用视觉模拟量表或VAS评估)和残疾(通过Oswestry残疾指数或ODI评估)变量。
    根据结果,两个运动组(ISOM和ISOT)在疼痛和残疾方面没有显着差异。然而,ISOM组的数值结果优于ISOT组。ISOM和ISOT组的疼痛水平均显著下降,随着ISOM的VAS评分从5.5降至2.7,ISOT的VAS评分从5.8降至3.7,与对照组相比(分别为P<0.001和P=0.001)。此外,与对照组相比,ISOM组(ODI评分为17~11分)和ISOT组(ODI评分为15.4~11分)的平均残疾均有显著改善(P<0.001).
    ISOM和ISOT方法均可有效缓解NSCLBP患者的疼痛和残疾。然而,它们之间的好处没有显着差异。数字上,ISOM练习被发现是优越的。需要进一步的研究才能获得关于其优越性的更准确的答案。
    UNASSIGNED: Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a prevalent condition that affects 90% of individuals experiencing low back pain. Core stabilization exercises (CSE) stand out as the most commonly employed therapeutic approach for managing NSCLBP. Nevertheless, there remains uncertainty regarding the superior effectiveness between isometric (ISOM) and isotonic (ISOT) types of CSE in the treatment of NSCLBP.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of ISOM and ISOT exercises concerning pain and disability in patients with NSCLBP. Additionally, the study aimed to assess the effectiveness of both ISOM and ISOT in comparison to no intervention concerning these variables in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a randomized controlled trial that involved 41 men and women experiencing NSCLBP. Participants were randomly allocated to three groups: ISOM CSE (n = 13), ISOT CSE (n = 14), and a waitlist control (n = 14). The exercise training was administered for 40 - 60 minutes three times a week over a period of up to 8 weeks. Pain (assessed using the Visual Analog Scale or VAS) and disability (evaluated through the Oswestry Disability Index or ODI) variables were measured before and after the interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the results, there was no significant difference between the 2 exercise groups (ISOM and ISOT) regarding pain and disability. However, the ISOM group demonstrated numerically better results than the ISOT group. Both the ISOM and ISOT groups exhibited a significant decrease in pain levels, with the VAS score decreasing from 5.5 to 2.7 for ISOM and from 5.8 to 3.7 for ISOT, as compared to the control group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Additionally, the average disability showed a significant improvement in both the ISOM (ODI score from 17 to 11) and ISOT (ODI score from 15.4 to 11) groups compared to the control group (P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Both ISOM and ISOT methods are effective in alleviating pain and disability in patients with NSCLBP. However, there is no significant difference in the benefits between them. Numerically, ISOM exercises were found to be superior. Further studies are needed to obtain a more accurate answer regarding their superiority.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    骶髂关节功能障碍(SIJD),虽然是腰痛的主要原因,仍然被忽视并被视为腰痛。Mulligan的运动动员(MWM)技术和核心稳定性练习(CSE)通常用于治疗腰痛。没有太多证据表明它在SIJD中有效。评价CSE联合MWM(CSE+MWM)治疗SIJD的疗效。
    招募39名SIJD患者,并随机分为以下不同的组:对照组(n=13),CSE组(n=13)和CSE+MWM组(n=13)。疼痛数字评分量表(NPRS),罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ),运动范围(ROM),使用压力疼痛阈值(PPT)和矢状面骨盆倾斜角不对称比(PTAR)来衡量干预前(M0)和干预后(M1)的成功。对所有实验数据进行统计分析。
    根据NPRS和RMDQ的测定,CSE+MWM组和CSE组的SIJ相关疼痛指标在M0和M1之间均显著降低。在M0和M1之间,CSE组的左轴旋转ROM和腰椎屈曲ROM明显减少。CSEMWM组的伸展ROM和左侧屈ROM在M0和M1之间均显着增加。在差异变量(M1-M0)中,CSEMWM组在左侧屈ROM中的表现明显优于对照组,在左轴旋转ROM中的表现明显优于CSE组。
    在患有SIJD的个人中,CSE+MWM有利于减轻疼痛,残疾,和功能。用CSE和MWM方法治疗SIJ似乎可以提高这种疗效。
    UNASSIGNED: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD), while being the primary contributor to low back pain, is still disregarded and treated as low back pain. Mulligan\'s Mobilization with Movement (MWM) Techniques and Core Stability Exercises (CSE) are often used to treat low back pain. There is not much evidence that it is effective in SIJD. To evaluate the effectiveness of CSE coupled with MWM (CSE + MWM) in the treatment of SIJD.
    UNASSIGNED: 39 patients with SIJD were recruited and randomly divided into distinct groups as follows: control group (n = 13), CSE group (n = 13) and CSE + MWM group (n = 13). The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Range of Motion (ROM), the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and the pelvic tilt angle asymmetry ratio in the sagittal plane (PTAR) were used to gauge the intervention\'s success both before (M0) and after (M1) it. All experimental data were statistically analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: The SIJ-related pain metric significantly decreased in both the CSE + MWM group and the CSE group between M0 and M1, as determined by the NPRS and RMDQ. Between M0 and M1, The CSE group\'s left axial rotation ROM and lumbar flexion ROM were significantly decreased. The CSE + MWM group\'s extension ROM and left lateral flexion ROM both significantly increased between M0 and M1. In the difference variable (M1-M0), the CSE + MWM group substantially outperformed control group in the left lateral flexion ROM and outperformed the CSE group in the left axial rotation ROM.
    UNASSIGNED: In individuals with SIJD, CSE + MWM is beneficial in lowering pain, disability, and function. Treatment with CSE and MWM approaches for SIJ appears to boost this efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号