Excessive compression after parotidectomy can lead to flap necrosis, while inadequate pressure can cause fluid accumulation. This study aimed to determine the optimal pressure and compression properties of different types of dressings. Initially, pressure measurements were taken for conventional Barton\'s dressing and a pre-fabricated facial garment. In the subsequent phase, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three types of pressure dressings: conforming bandage Barton\'s dressing, elastic bandage Barton\'s dressing or pre-fabricated facial garment. The dressing types were randomly crossed over the following day. The mean pressure exerted by conventional Barton\'s dressing and the pre-fabricated facial garment was 15.86 and 14.81 mmHg, respectively. There was no significant difference in the proportion of optimal pressure among the three types of pressure dressing (p-values of 0.195, 0.555 and 0.089 at pre-auricular, angle of mandible and post-auricular sites, respectively). The pre-auricular area demonstrated the highest proportion of optimal pressure, while suboptimal pressure was noted at the angle of the mandible and post-auricular area. Dressing types had no effect on pressure stability (p = 0.37), and there was no significant difference in patient preference (p = 0.91). Conforming bandage Barton\'s dressing, elastic bandage Barton\'s dressing and pre-fabricated facial garment exhibit comparable compressive properties, with no significant difference in patient preference and pressure stability.

UNASSIGNED: It is commonly believed that using abdominal binders or compression garments (CGs) after an abdominoplasty could encourage fluid to drain, which would prevent fluid from building up at the surgical site and reduce the risk of seroma and other similar problems.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the effect of the use of abdominal binders or CG on the post-operative outcomes following abdominoplasty.
UNASSIGNED: Systematic review.
UNASSIGNED: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to select relevant studies from 2004 to 2024. Data from the included studies were extracted to assess the quality and risk of bias using a modified Jadaad score.
UNASSIGNED: Post-operative seroma formation.
UNASSIGNED: Ventilatory function, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and subcutaneous edema were the outcomes of interest.
UNASSIGNED: Only 5 trials totaling 130 patients were included in this review. Utilizing post-operative CG following abdominoplasty showed a non-significant tendency to decrease seroma development, ventilatory function, and subcutaneous edema. The limited evidence available also suggested that using post-operative CG increases IAP.
UNASSIGNED: Weak evidence supports the beneficial use of abdominal binders following abdominoplasty.
UNASSIGNED: Low-quality scientific evidence available from the scant data and low caliber of the literature support the use of CG post-abdominoplasty. Therefore, unified outcome reporting and rigid randomized clinical trials are necessary to obtain valid data.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women. Hence, its treatment has become our utmost priority in developing countries like India. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) has traditionally been used as the standard of care for early-stage invasive breast carcinoma and still is the most commonly used surgical treatment for carcinoma breast.
OBJECTIVE: The study compared the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with skin flaps raised using a harmonic scalpel versus those raised using electrocautery.
METHODS: Sixty women with biopsy-proven breast cancer who had to undergo MRM were randomly assigned to undergo skin flap raising during mastectomy by using electrocautery or harmonic scalpel. Thirty patients had surgery with electrocautery (Group 1) and 30 with a harmonic scalpel (Group 2) by the same surgical team.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was significantly longer with harmonic scalpel when compared to that with electrocautery (140.67 ± 28.55 vs. 122.00 ± 19.16 mins, P =0.004). The amount of intraoperative blood loss (178.33 ± 21.06 vs 138.50 ± 28.53 mL P = 0.001) was less in the group operated with the harmonic scalpel, which was statistically significant. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding total drainage content (310.83 ± 88.93 vs 298.20 ± 127.87 mL, P = 0.659), drain duration (6.83 ± 0.75 vs 7.43 ± 2.27 days, p=0.174), seroma (3.3% vs. 0%) wound infection (3.3% vs 0%), flap necrosis (16.7% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.195), duration of hospital stays (8.57 ± 0.77 vs 8.43 ± 1.61 days, p=0.684).
CONCLUSIONS: Harmonic scalpels have a few advantages over electrocautery, but are not cost-effective.

OBJECTIVE:  Using liquid fibrin sealants has once again questioned the benefit of drain placement in head and neck operations. Cellulose-based hemostats offering different hemostasis mechanisms have scarcely been investigated in drainless neck surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate whether liquid fibrin sealant offers any advantage over cellulose-based hemostats in various head and neck surgeries.
METHODS: A prospective trial of patients who underwent various neck surgeries between 2020 and 2022. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between the drain-placed and the drainless groups, with the latter sub-categorized into three groups: fibrin sealant, cellulose-based hemostats, and a combination of both.
RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were included (63 thyroidectomies, 40 parathyroidectomies, and 16 sialoadenectomies). Fifty eight had a drain placed and 61 had no drain. In the drainless group, 23 patients received cellulose-based absorbable hemostats (SURGICEL®/ FIBRILLAR™); 18 patients had fibrin sealants (EVICEL®/TachoSil®/TISSEEL); in 16, a combination of both was used; and in four patients, no hemostatic agent was used. Three (5%) of the 61 drainless patients developed a seroma compared to one (2%) seroma in the drain-placed patients. No advantage was demonstrated using a combination of FIBRILLAR™ with a fibrin sealant nor for any used separately. Drain placement delayed patient discharge by at least one day compared to the group without a drain (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Drain placement offered a minor advantage in the postoperative course reducing rates of seroma formation, while delaying patient discharge by at least one day. There was no advantage in using a specific hemostatic agent over the other.

UNASSIGNED: Nearly half a million interbody fusions are estimated to be performed in the US each year, many of which involve complex reconstruction. The ability to limit seroma formation is vital to a seamless postoperative recovery.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing fusion procedures along with flap reconstruction over a period of 20 months. Cohorts reflect a temporal practice shift where use of hydrolyzed collagen powder (HCP) was initiated for hypothesized seroma prevention. Outcomes and associated metrics were used for intergroup comparison.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 76 patients, of whom 47 were treated with HCP and 29 were not. Control patients had significantly fewer postoperative seromas than experimental ones (6.9% vs 27.7%; P = .03). The cohorts had no significant differences in time until final drain removal or in number of spinal levels involved (7.8 vs 7.1 days; P = .33, 8.5 vs 8.4 levels; P = .90). Rates of wound dehiscence, hematoma, or infection did not differ significantly between control and experimental patients (3.4% vs 12.8%, P = .17; 0% vs 0%; and 6.9% vs 10.6%, P = .58, respectively).
UNASSIGNED: The use of HCP led to a 4-fold increase in postoperative seromas in patients undergoing spinal fusion with flap reconstruction. This was regardless of all analyzed demographic and procedural factors, with the exception of age, whereby control patients were found to be on average slightly younger than experimental counterparts.

Despite the growing use of autologous breast reconstruction with medial thigh-based free flaps, such as transverse upper gracilis (TMG) or profunda artery perforator (PAP) flaps, these procedures are infrequently performed on patients with obesity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the frequency of seroma occurrence, a common complication after medial thigh flap surgery. Comparison was performed between TMG and PAP flaps, as well as medial thigh lifts (MTL), a procedure with a similar operative technique but which is typically offered to patients with a higher body mass index (BMI). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we analyzed EMBASE, PUBMED, and MEDLINE data (English/German). The primary outcomes assessed were occurrence of seroma, as well as hematoma and wound dehiscence. Subgroup analyses explored age, BMI, and various surgical factors. This meta-analysis incorporated 28 studies, totaling 1096 patients. MTL patients had significantly higher BMIs, whereas seroma rates were similar among TMG, PAP, and MTL patients. The incidence of hematoma and wound dehiscence was also similar across the groups. In the metaregression analysis, factors such as age and BMI showed no significant correlation with seroma occurrence in all groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis identified comparable rates of seroma formation after TMG flap, PAP flap, and MTL procedures. Considering that this phenomenon occurred despite the elevated BMI of the MTL group, we propose that patients with higher BMI need not be excluded as candidates for autologous medial thigh-based breast reconstruction. Hence, these procedures should not be limited to small- to medium-sized breasts. Large-scale prospective studies are imperative to validate these conclusions and reveal the underlying factors contributing to seroma formation.

Seroma formation is a common sequel following modified radical mastectomy (MRM), which hinders healing, may prolong hospital stay, and cause a delay in adjuvant treatment. Closed suction drains have been used to prevent formation of seroma; however, the use of a single drain in the axilla along with draining the mastectomy flaps and axilla separately remains a topic of debate. This prospective randomized dual-arm study was conducted in the Department of Endocrine Surgery. All female patients with carcinoma breast diagnosed on core tissue biopsy, undergoing modified radical mastectomy, upfront or post neoadjuvant systemic therapy were included. Patients were randomized into two groups. In the first group, a single drain was placed in the axilla whereas in the second group, a drain each was placed below the mastectomy flaps and the axilla. Patients\' particulars and the weight of the mass excised along with the operative details were documented. The volume of the drain was recorded daily. The flap drain was removed on postoperative day 5 and the axillary drain was removed when the drain volume was less than 30 mL/24 h for 2 consecutive days. The period of drain placement, volume of drainage, volume of seroma (if formed), and other complications (if any) were recorded. Patients in the single drain group had a significantly earlier drain removal time as compared to those with double drains (p = 0.01). The number of patients in whom seroma formation had occurred was more in the double drain group, but the difference was not significant. The average volume of aspirated seroma fluid was insignificantly more in the single drain group. The only other complication noticed was flap necrosis-in 5% patients of the double drain group. Total volume of drainage (p < 0.0001) and type of drain (p = 0.0208) were associated with higher rates of seroma formation, whereas BMI (p = 0.0516), weight of excised breast mass (p = 0.407), and age (p = 0.6379) were not associated with the rate of seroma formation. Outcomes in terms of drain volume or seroma formation were statistically indifferent between the two groups. Still, use of only a single axillary drain should be promoted, keeping in mind the earlier drain removal period, better patient compliance, and reduced hospital stay.

UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential of a novel surgical procedure, the Total Sealing Technique (TST), using the latest bipolar vessel sealing system (BVSS; LigaSure™ Exact Dissector) to reduce lymphatic leakage and seroma formation after electrocautery axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer surgery. Prolonged drainage is a common occurrence after ALND, primarily due to lymphatic leakage. In addition, the presence of seroma often leads to delays in the administration of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy even after drain removal.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a comparative analysis of 36 patients who underwent total mastectomy with ALND using conventional electrocautery technique (CONV) during the first 3 years, and 35 patients who underwent the same procedure using TST during the subsequent 3 years. The following factors were compared to assess the impact of TST: operation time, blood loss, total drainage volume, mean time to drain removal, postoperative hospital stay, mean time to initiation of postoperative chemotherapy, and postoperative complications in each group.
UNASSIGNED: TST significantly reduced drainage volume (360.5 vs. 820.6 mL, p < 0.001), days to drain removal (4.8 vs. 6.8 days, p < 0.001), postoperative hospital stay (5.9 vs. 9.6 days, p < 0.001), the incidence of seroma (28.6 % vs. 65.9 %, p = 0.001), and time to chemotherapy initiation (33.1 vs. 61.4 days, p < 0.001) compared to CONV.
UNASSIGNED: TST in total mastectomy with ALND effectively decreases the incidence of lymphorrhea and seroma formation; thus, it can be recommended for total mastectomy with ALND.

Introduction Seroma formation is the most common complication after modified radical mastectomy (MRM). It leads to increased pain and discomfort, potentially prolonging morbidity and treatment. Various treatment modalities are being used to decrease the incidence of seroma formation. The objective of this study was to compare intravenous hydrocortisone injection versus placebo in patients undergoing MRM in terms of frequency of post-operative seroma formation. Methods This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted at Surgical Unit-I, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan from January 2021 to December 2021. A total of 152 female patients were randomly assigned to each of the study and placebo groups. Group I patients received 100 mg of hydrocortisone intravenously while group II patients received one ml of 0.9% normal saline intravenously prior to induction of general anesthesia for MRM. The incidence of seroma formation after 10 days of MRM and total drain volume till their removal was measured in all patients. Results The mean age was 48.42±10.15 in Group I, while it was 47.67±10.75 in Group II. Mean drain output till removal was 99.14±31.01 ml in the hydrocortisone group and 177.57±63.37 ml in the placebo group. Forty-eight patients developed seroma (31.58%), of whom nine received intravenous hydrocortisone and 39 received normal saline (P=0.000). Conclusion Intravenous hydrocortisone is effective in terms of frequency of post-operative seroma formation as compared to placebo in patients undergoing MRM.

BACKGROUND: The value of prophylactic closed-suction drainage in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) is still a matter of controversy. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies examining postoperative seroma rates in patients with or without routine placement of closed-suction drainage tubes.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for trials comparing the outcome of TEP with or without routine drainage placement. Data regarding postoperative outcomes were extracted and compared by meta-analysis. The odds ratio and standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS: Four studies were identified, involving a total of 1626 cases (Drain: n = 1251, no Drain: n = 375). There was a statistically significant difference noted between the 2 groups regarding postoperative seroma formation favoring the Drain group (odds ratio = 0.12; 95% confidence intervals [0.05, 0.29]; P < .001; 4 studies; I2 = 72%). For the remaining secondary endpoints postoperative urinary retention, recurrence, mesh infection and in-hospital length of stay no statistically significant difference was noted between the 2 study groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that patients who underwent TEP with routine closed-suction drain placement developed significantly fewer seromas without any additional morbidity or prolongation of in-hospital stay.