seroma

血清腺瘤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用液体纤维蛋白封闭剂再次质疑引流在头颈部手术中的益处。在无引流颈部手术中,几乎没有研究提供不同止血机制的基于纤维素的止血剂。这项研究旨在评估液体纤维蛋白密封剂在各种头颈部手术中是否比纤维素基止血剂具有任何优势。
    方法:一项对2020年至2022年接受各种颈部手术的患者进行的前瞻性试验。比较放置引流管和无引流管的基线特征和术后结果,后者分为三组:纤维蛋白密封剂,基于纤维素的止血剂,以及两者的结合。
    结果:共纳入119例患者(63例甲状腺切除术,40例甲状旁腺切除术,和16例唾液腺切除术)。58个有排水沟,61个没有排水沟。在无排水组中,23例患者接受了基于纤维素的可吸收止血剂(SURGICEL®/FIBRILLAR™);18例患者使用了纤维蛋白封闭剂(EVICEL®/TachoSil®/TISSEEL);16例患者使用了两者的组合;4例患者,未使用止血剂。61例无引流患者中有3例(5%)出现血清肿,而引流患者中有1例(2%)出现血清肿。使用FIBRILLAR™与纤维蛋白密封剂的组合以及任何单独使用都没有显示出优势。与没有引流的组相比,引流放置延迟了患者出院至少一天(p<0.001)。
    结论:引流在降低血清肿形成率的术后病程中具有较小的优势,同时延迟患者出院至少一天。使用特定的止血剂与其他止血剂相比没有优势。
    OBJECTIVE:  Using liquid fibrin sealants has once again questioned the benefit of drain placement in head and neck operations. Cellulose-based hemostats offering different hemostasis mechanisms have scarcely been investigated in drainless neck surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate whether liquid fibrin sealant offers any advantage over cellulose-based hemostats in various head and neck surgeries.
    METHODS: A prospective trial of patients who underwent various neck surgeries between 2020 and 2022. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between the drain-placed and the drainless groups, with the latter sub-categorized into three groups: fibrin sealant, cellulose-based hemostats, and a combination of both.
    RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were included (63 thyroidectomies, 40 parathyroidectomies, and 16 sialoadenectomies). Fifty eight had a drain placed and 61 had no drain. In the drainless group, 23 patients received cellulose-based absorbable hemostats (SURGICEL®/ FIBRILLAR™); 18 patients had fibrin sealants (EVICEL®/TachoSil®/TISSEEL); in 16, a combination of both was used; and in four patients, no hemostatic agent was used. Three (5%) of the 61 drainless patients developed a seroma compared to one (2%) seroma in the drain-placed patients. No advantage was demonstrated using a combination of FIBRILLAR™ with a fibrin sealant nor for any used separately. Drain placement delayed patient discharge by at least one day compared to the group without a drain (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Drain placement offered a minor advantage in the postoperative course reducing rates of seroma formation, while delaying patient discharge by at least one day. There was no advantage in using a specific hemostatic agent over the other.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜IPOM在技术上具有挑战性,特别是关于筋膜闭合。混合修复已被提出作为一种更简单的方法。我们旨在比较接受腹侧疝修补术(VHR)的患者的混合和腹腔镜腹膜内嵌式网片修补术(IPOM)。
    方法:我们对Cochrane,Scopus,和MEDLINE数据库,以确定比较混合与腹腔镜IPOMVHR报告复发结果的研究,死亡率,血清肿,术后并发症,再操作,手术部位感染,和手术时间。使用RStudio4.1.2使用随机效应模型进行统计分析。
    结果:我们筛选了2,896篇文章,并对其中22篇进行了全面审查。总共有五项研究,纳入664例患者.其中,337例(50.8%)行腹腔镜IPOM。所有病人都有切口疝,平均直径从3到12.7厘米不等,60%是女性,平均BMI从29.5到38不等。与腹腔镜相比,混合方法的血清肿发生率较低(OR0.22;95%CI0.05至0.92;p=0.038;I²=78%)。我们发现复发没有差异,死亡率,术后并发症,再操作,手术部位感染,和组间手术时间。
    结论:混合IPOM是一种安全有效的切口疝修补方法。此外,它有助于筋膜缺损闭合并减少术后血清瘤。
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic IPOM is technically challenging, especially regarding fascial closure. Hybrid repair has been proposed as a simpler approach. We aimed to compare hybrid and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR).
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases to identify studies comparing hybrid versus laparoscopic IPOM VHR reporting the outcomes of recurrence, mortality, seroma, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 4.1.2 using a random-effects model.
    RESULTS: We screened 2,896 articles and fully reviewed 22 of them. A total of five studies, encompassing 664 patients were included. Among them, 337 (50.8%) underwent laparoscopic IPOM. All patients had incisional hernias, with a mean diameter varying from 3 to 12.7 cm, 60% were women, with a mean BMI varying from 29.5 to 38. The hybrid approach had a lower rate of seroma when compared to the laparoscopic (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.92; p = 0.038; I²=78%). We found no difference in recurrence, mortality, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time between groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid IPOM is a safe and effective method for incisional hernia repair. Moreover, it facilitates fascial defect closure and decreases postoperative seromas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的/背景血清瘤形成是乳腺手术后最常见的并发症。然而,关于这个问题的在线患者教育材料的可读性几乎没有证据。本研究旨在评估相关在线信息的可访问性和可读性。方法对文献进行系统回顾,确定了37个相关网站进行进一步分析。通过使用一系列可读性公式来评估每篇在线文章的可读性。结果所有患者教育材料的Flesch-ReadingEase平均得分为53.9(±21.9),Flesch-Kincaid平均阅读等级为7.32(±3.1),这表明他们“相当困难”阅读,并且高于推荐的阅读水平。结论关于术后乳腺血清肿的在线患者教育材料处于高于公众推荐阅读等级的水平。改善将允许所有患者,不管识字水平如何,获取这些资源,以帮助进行乳房手术的决策。
    Aims/Background Seroma formation is the most common complication following breast surgery. However, there is little evidence on the readability of online patient education materials on this issue. This study aimed to assess the accessibility and readability of the relevant online information. Methods This systematic review of the literature identified 37 relevant websites for further analysis. The readability of each online article was assessed through using a range of readability formulae. Results The average Flesch-Reading Ease score for all patient education materials was 53.9 (± 21.9) and the average Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level was 7.32 (± 3.1), suggesting they were \'fairly difficult\' to read and is higher than the recommended reading level. Conclusion Online patient education materials regarding post-surgery breast seroma are at a higher-than-recommended reading grade level for the public. Improvement would allow all patients, regardless of literacy level, to access such resources to aid decision-making around undergoing breast surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:乳房植入物移除和囊切除术的数量继续迅速增加。外植体手术的目的应该是从美学和功能的角度优化患者的结果。
    目的:确认无引流全囊切除术的安全性,并确定肌肉修复在去除胸肌下或双平面美容乳房植入物后的外植体结局中的作用。
    方法:我们在2021年1月至2023年11月之间对我们的技术进行了回顾性评估。我们报告了一个单外科医生系列,包括140例从双平面或胸膜下口袋中取出美容乳房植入物的连续病例,全部进行全囊切除术。在每种情况下,囊切除术后对胸大肌进行了细致的修复。在任何情况下都不使用排水沟。所有患者均随访至少3个月。术后至少6个月评估患者满意度。
    结果:通过执行所描述的无排水技术,没有血清肿的病例,血肿,气胸或美容乳房变形在这个系列。83%的患者被视为日间病例,患者对结果的满意度很高。
    结论:不使用引流管的全囊切除术是一种新颖而安全的方法,精心修复胸大肌。血清肿的风险没有增加。肌肉修复可能有助于防止乳房外植体后美容畸形。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: The number of breast implant removal and capsulectomy procedures continues to increase rapidly. The aim of explant surgery should be to optimise patient outcomes from both an aesthetic and functional perspective.
    OBJECTIVE: To confirm the safety of drainless total capsulectomy and to determine the role of muscle repair in explant outcomes following the removal of sub-pectoral or dual-plane cosmetic breast implants.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of our technique between January 2021 and November 2023. We report a single surgeon series of 140 consecutive cases of cosmetic breast implant removal from dual-plane or sub-pectoral pockets, all performed with total capsulectomy. In each case, meticulous repair of the Pectoralis major muscle was performed following capsulectomy. Drains were not used in any case. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months. Patient satisfaction was assessed a minimum of 6 months post-operatively.
    RESULTS: By performing the described drainless technique, there were no cases of seroma, haematoma, pneumothorax or cosmetic breast distortion in this series. 83% of patients were treated as day cases and patient satisfaction with outcomes was high.
    CONCLUSIONS: Total capsulectomy without the use of drains is a novel and safe approach, aided by careful repair of the Pectoralis major muscle. There is no increased risk of seroma. The muscle repair may help to prevent post-explant cosmetic deformity of the breast.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着人们对术后快速恢复的兴趣日益增加,在深腹壁下穿支(DIEP)基于皮瓣的乳房重建中,有省略引流的趋势,理想情况下,旨在避免乳房和腹部引流。这项研究评估了我们向完全无排水重建的过渡,特别关注省略乳房引流管的安全性。回顾了2018年至2023年接受DIEP皮瓣乳房重建的患者。他们分为3组:A组(腹部和乳房有引流),B组(仅在乳房引流),和C组(完全无引流)。对于C组,进行常规超声检查以检查液体积聚。比较各组的并发症情况。总的来说,包括294例,A组77人,112在B组中,C组105人按时间顺序,观察到C组病例比例逐渐增加,并发症发生率保持稳定。在比较3组中受体和供体部位的并发症情况时,没有发现显著差异。乳腺血清肿,术后持续1个月,仅在C组中的6例(5.7%)中检测到,所有患者均接受了门诊门诊误吸治疗.当将分析限制在C组时,更大重量的乳房切除术标本和腋窝淋巴结清扫显示与乳腺血清肿的发展独立相关。顺利过渡到完全无引流的DIEP乳房重建似乎是安全的,不会显着增加并发症的风险。
    With increasing interest in swift postoperative recovery, there has been a trend toward omitting drains in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap-based breast reconstruction, ideally aiming to avoid drains in the breasts and abdomen. This study evaluated our transition toward total drainless reconstruction, focusing specifically on the safety of omitting drains in the breasts. Patients who underwent breast reconstruction with DIEP flap from 2018 to 2023 were reviewed. They were divided into 3 groups: group A (with drains in the abdomen and breast), group B (drains only in the breast), and group C (total drainless). For group C, routine ultrasound examinations were performed to check for fluid accumulation. Complication profiles were compared among the groups. In total, 294 cases were included, comprising 77 in group A, 112 in group B, and 105 in group C. Chronologically, a gradual increase in the proportion of cases in group C was observed, with the complication rates remaining stable. On comparing the complication profiles of the recipient and donor sites among the 3 groups, no significant differences were found. Breast seroma, persisting 1 month postoperatively, was exclusively detected in 6 (5.7%) cases within group C, all of whom were treated with outpatient clinic-based aspiration. When restricting the analysis to group C, a greater weight of mastectomy specimen and axillary lymph node dissections exhibited an independent association with breast seroma development. Smooth transition to total drainless DIEP breast reconstruction appears safe, without significantly increasing the risks of complication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹部成形术,一种全球新兴的外科手术,与并发症有关,作为血清肿,感染,还有血肿.本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了使用手术刀和透热凝固装置(透热单极电灼术)进行腹部成形术的结果。旨在找到一种更安全、并发症更少的方法。
    方法:我们在2023年11月使用PubMed进行了系统搜索,OvidMedline,和OvidChocrane数据库.非随机研究的方法学指数和修订的Cochrane偏差风险评估工具用于评估观察性研究和随机对照试验的偏差风险。分别。使用RevMan软件分析数据。
    结果:共纳入6篇(1135例患者),521名患者使用手术刀进行手术,614名患者使用电灼术进行手术。我们的分析表明,在电灼组中,血清肿和引流输出更多。比值比(OR)为0.62(95%CI[0.39,0.97],p=0.04)和-103.63(95%CI[-205.67,-1.59],p=0.05),分别。重要的是要注意在讨论总排水输出的研究中看到的高度异质性。此外,在血肿发生率方面,我们没有发现两种技术之间有任何统计学意义,伤口感染,操作时间,和住院时间。
    结论:当比较在腹部成形术中使用手术刀和电灼解剖时,较高的血清肿发生率和总引流输出量与电刀夹层显着相关。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty, an emerging surgical procedure worldwide, associated with complications, as seroma, infection, and hematoma. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare the outcomes of abdominoplasty procedures performed using a scalpel versus a diathermocoagulation device (diathermy monopolar electrocautery), aiming to find a safer approach with fewer complications.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in November 2023 using PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Ovid Chocrane databases. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies and the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tools were used to assess risk of bias for observational studies and randomized controlled trials, respectively. The data were analyzed using RevMan software.
    RESULTS: Six articles (1135 patients) were included, 521 patients were operated using a scalpel and 614 using electrocautery. Our analysis suggests that both seroma and drain output were seen more among the electrocautery group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.62 (95% CI [0.39, 0.97], p = 0.04) and - 103.63 (95% CI [- 205.67, - 1.59], p = 0.05), respectively. It is important to note the high heterogeneity seen among the studies discussing the total drain output. Additionally, we did not find any statistical significance between both techniques in terms of the rate of hematoma, wound infection, operation time, and hospital stay length.
    CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the use of scalpel and electrocautery dissection in abdominoplasty, higher rates of seroma and total drain output are significantly associated with electrocautery dissection.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    估计每年在美国进行近50万次体内融合,其中许多涉及复杂的重建。限制血清肿形成的能力对于无缝的术后恢复至关重要。
    对接受融合手术并进行皮瓣重建的患者进行了20个月的回顾性研究。队列反映了暂时的实践转变,即开始使用水解胶原蛋白粉末(HCP)进行假设的血清肿预防。结果和相关指标用于组间比较。
    该研究包括76名患者,其中47人接受了HCP治疗,29人未接受治疗。对照组患者的术后血清瘤明显少于实验患者(6.9%vs27.7%;P=0.03)。队列在最终引流之前的时间或涉及的脊髓水平数量上没有显着差异(7.8比7.1天;P=.33,8.5比8.4水平;P=.90)。伤口开裂的比率,血肿,或感染在对照组和实验患者之间没有显着差异(3.4%vs12.8%,P=.17;0%对0%;6.9%对10.6%,分别为P=.58)。
    HCP的使用导致接受皮瓣重建的脊柱融合术的患者术后血清瘤增加了4倍。这与所有分析的人口统计学和程序因素无关,除了年龄,因此,发现对照组患者平均比实验患者年轻一些。
    UNASSIGNED: Nearly half a million interbody fusions are estimated to be performed in the US each year, many of which involve complex reconstruction. The ability to limit seroma formation is vital to a seamless postoperative recovery.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing fusion procedures along with flap reconstruction over a period of 20 months. Cohorts reflect a temporal practice shift where use of hydrolyzed collagen powder (HCP) was initiated for hypothesized seroma prevention. Outcomes and associated metrics were used for intergroup comparison.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 76 patients, of whom 47 were treated with HCP and 29 were not. Control patients had significantly fewer postoperative seromas than experimental ones (6.9% vs 27.7%; P = .03). The cohorts had no significant differences in time until final drain removal or in number of spinal levels involved (7.8 vs 7.1 days; P = .33, 8.5 vs 8.4 levels; P = .90). Rates of wound dehiscence, hematoma, or infection did not differ significantly between control and experimental patients (3.4% vs 12.8%, P = .17; 0% vs 0%; and 6.9% vs 10.6%, P = .58, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: The use of HCP led to a 4-fold increase in postoperative seromas in patients undergoing spinal fusion with flap reconstruction. This was regardless of all analyzed demographic and procedural factors, with the exception of age, whereby control patients were found to be on average slightly younger than experimental counterparts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:血清瘤形成是腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术相关发病的最常见原因。本研究旨在研究皮下脂肪厚度(TSF)与术后血清肿风险之间的关系。
    方法:我们回顾了在2018年8月至2021年7月期间接受腹腔镜全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝的229例男性患者的前瞻性队列数据。使用术前超声图像评估TSF。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型确定术后血清肿的危险因素。
    结果:26例(11.4%)患者发生术后血清瘤。与术后血清肿相关的因素包括较长的疝持续时间,较大的疝缺损,延伸到阴囊,TSF越大(P<0.05)。在多变量分析中,TSF越大,术后血清肿风险越大(每1mm:奇数比[OR]1.105,95%置信区间[CI]1.048-1.165,P<0.001;TSF≥26.0mm:OR7.033,95%CI2.485-19.901,P<0.001).在亚组分析中获得了类似的结果。TSF预测血清肿形成的曲线下面积为0.703(95%CI0.601-0.806)。
    结论:超声来源的TSF可能是腹腔镜TEP修补术患者术后血清肿的一个有希望的预后因素。需要进一步验证,然后可以使用此参数来改善决策过程。
    OBJECTIVE: Seroma formation is the most common cause of morbidity associated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to examine the relationship between the thickness of subcutaneous fat (TSF) and the risk of postoperative seroma.
    METHODS: We reviewed data from a prospective cohort of 229 male patients who underwent laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal (TEP) hernioplasty for indirect inguinal hernia between August 2018 and July 2021. The TSF was assessed using preoperative ultrasound images. The risk factors for postoperative seroma were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.
    RESULTS: Postoperative seromas occurred in 26 patients (11.4%). The factors associated with postoperative seroma included longer hernia duration, larger hernia defects, extension into the scrotum, and greater TSF (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, a greater TSF was independently associated with a greater risk of postoperative seroma (per 1 mm: odd ratio [OR] 1.105, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.048-1.165, P < 0.001; TSF ≥ 26.0 mm: OR 7.033, 95% CI 2.485-19.901, P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in the subgroup analysis. The area under the curve of TSF for predicting seroma formation was 0.703 (95% CI 0.601-0.806).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-derived TSF may be a promising prognostic factor for postoperative seroma in patients undergoing laparoscopic TEP repair. Further validation is required and then this parameter can be used to improve decision-making process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管越来越多地使用大腿内侧游离皮瓣进行自体乳房重建,如横向上肌腱(TMG)或深动脉穿支(PAP)皮瓣,这些程序很少对肥胖患者进行。这项系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较血清肿发生的频率,大腿内侧皮瓣手术后的常见并发症。比较TMG和PAP皮瓣,以及内侧大腿举重(MTL),手术技术相似,但通常适用于体重指数(BMI)较高的患者。遵循系统审查和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,我们分析了EMBASE,pubmed,和MEDLINE数据(英语/德语)。评估的主要结果是血清肿的发生,还有血肿和伤口裂开.亚组分析探讨了年龄,BMI,和各种手术因素。这项荟萃分析纳入了28项研究,共1096名患者。MTL患者的BMI明显较高,而TMG的血清肿发生率相似,PAP,和MTL患者。各组血肿和伤口裂开的发生率也相似。在回归分析中,年龄和BMI等因素与各组血清肿的发生无显著相关性。这项系统评价和荟萃分析确定了TMG皮瓣后血清肿形成的可比率,PAP襟翼,和MTL程序。考虑到这种现象发生,尽管MTL组的BMI升高,我们建议BMI较高的患者不需要被排除为自体大腿内侧乳房再造的候选人.因此,这些手术不应仅限于中小型乳房。大规模的前瞻性研究必须验证这些结论并揭示导致血清肿形成的潜在因素。
    Despite the growing use of autologous breast reconstruction with medial thigh-based free flaps, such as transverse upper gracilis (TMG) or profunda artery perforator (PAP) flaps, these procedures are infrequently performed on patients with obesity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the frequency of seroma occurrence, a common complication after medial thigh flap surgery. Comparison was performed between TMG and PAP flaps, as well as medial thigh lifts (MTL), a procedure with a similar operative technique but which is typically offered to patients with a higher body mass index (BMI). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we analyzed EMBASE, PUBMED, and MEDLINE data (English/German). The primary outcomes assessed were occurrence of seroma, as well as hematoma and wound dehiscence. Subgroup analyses explored age, BMI, and various surgical factors. This meta-analysis incorporated 28 studies, totaling 1096 patients. MTL patients had significantly higher BMIs, whereas seroma rates were similar among TMG, PAP, and MTL patients. The incidence of hematoma and wound dehiscence was also similar across the groups. In the metaregression analysis, factors such as age and BMI showed no significant correlation with seroma occurrence in all groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis identified comparable rates of seroma formation after TMG flap, PAP flap, and MTL procedures. Considering that this phenomenon occurred despite the elevated BMI of the MTL group, we propose that patients with higher BMI need not be excluded as candidates for autologous medial thigh-based breast reconstruction. Hence, these procedures should not be limited to small- to medium-sized breasts. Large-scale prospective studies are imperative to validate these conclusions and reveal the underlying factors contributing to seroma formation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腋窝和腹股沟淋巴结清扫术通常与并发症相关,通常需要额外的干预措施。
    方法:将通过标准程序进行腋窝或腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的患者与使用局部氨甲环酸(TXA)进行腋窝或腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的患者的干预队列进行比较伤口腔,PICO(史密斯和侄子英国)闭式切口负压敷料,并在原地用排水管提前排出。
    结果:对照组76名患者(平均年龄65.8岁,平均BMI28.4kg/m2)接受了无局部TXA和简单敷料的开放淋巴结切除术。78例患者被纳入干预组(平均年龄67.1岁,平均BMI28.5kg/m2)。干预组患者的住院时间比对照组平均少5.6天(CI3.09-5.31;p<0.0001),估计每位患者在“卧床”天为医疗保健信托节省3046.40英镑(3723.61美元)。\“他们的排水持续时间更长(平均15天vs.8.3天);然而,他们具有统计学上显著降低需要引流的血清肿形成风险(6.4%vs.21%;p=.009),和皮肤坏死(0%vs.6.6%;p=.027)。他们的感染风险也较低(17%vs.29%),伤口裂开(15%vs.25%),和再入院(7.7%与14%),尽管它们没有统计学意义。对照组患者作为住院患者更有可能接受抗生素治疗(51%vs.7.7%;p<.00001)和出院时(24%与5%;p<.0011)比干预组。
    结论:主题TXA,PICO敷料,淋巴结清扫术后早期引流可降低并发症发生率。
    BACKGROUND: Axillary and inguinal lymph node dissections are commonly associated with complications that often require additional interventions.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent axillary or inguinal lymphadenectomy via standard procedures were compared to an intervention cohort of patients who underwent axillary or inguinal lymphadenectomy with the use of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) to the wound cavity, a PICO (Smith&Nephew UK) closed-incision negative pressure dressing, and discharged early with a drain in-situ.
    RESULTS: Seventy-six patients in the control group (mean age 65.8 years, mean BMI 28.4 kg/m2) underwent open lymphadenectomy without topical TXA and a simple dressing. Seventy-eight patients were included in the intervention group (mean age 67.1 years, mean BMI 28.5 kg/m2). Patients in the intervention group had an inpatient stay of mean 5.6 days fewer than those in the control group (CI 3.09-5.31; p < .0001), an estimated saving to the healthcare trust of £ 3046.40 (US$3723.61) per patient in \"bed days.\" They had longer drain duration (mean 15 days vs. 8.3 days); however, they had a statistically significant lower risk of seroma formation requiring drainage (6.4% vs. 21%; p = .009), and skin necrosis (0% vs. 6.6%; p = .027). They also had a lower risk of infection (17% vs. 29%), wound dehiscence (15% vs. 25%), and readmission (7.7% vs. 14%), although they were not statistically significant. Patients in the control group were more likely to receive antibiotics as inpatients (51% vs. 7.7%; p < .00001) and on discharge (24% vs. 5%; p < .0011) than those in the intervention group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Topical TXA, PICO dressing, and early discharge with a drain following lymphadenectomy results in a reduced rate of complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号