retroperitoneal sarcoma

腹膜后肉瘤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹内和腹膜后平滑肌肉瘤是罕见的癌症,导致显著的发病率和死亡率。症状,治疗和随访不同于其他癌症,腹内和腹膜后平滑肌肉瘤的正确诊断和治疗至关重要。我们进行了系统评价,以收集和总结这些肿瘤的诊断和治疗的可用证据。
    我们从最早的条目开始对Pubmed进行了系统的文献检索,直到2021年1月。我们的搜索短语是((((结肠)或(直肠))或(肠))或(腹部)或(腹膜后))和(平滑肌肉瘤)。所有点击由两位作者评估。
    我们预定义的搜索确定了1983次命中,我们选择了218次点击,并检索了这些点击的全文副本。144项研究纳入审查。
    这篇综述总结了关于非子宫腹部和腹膜后平滑肌肉瘤的现有知识和证据。审查显示缺乏高质量的证据,和随机临床试验。在腹部和腹膜后平滑肌肉瘤领域非常需要更多实质性和高质量的研究。
    PROSPERO,标识符,CRD42023480527。
    UNASSIGNED: Intraabdominal and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas are rare cancers, which cause significant morbidity and mortality. Symptoms, treatment and follow up differs from other cancers, and proper diagnosis and treatment of intraabdominal and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas is of utmost importance. We performed a systematic review to collect and summarize available evidence for diagnosis and treatment for these tumours.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a systematic literature search of Pubmed from the earliest entry possible, until January 2021. Our search phrase was (((((colon) OR (rectum)) OR (intestine)) OR (abdomen)) OR (retroperitoneum)) AND (leiomyosarcoma). All hits were evaluated by two of the authors.
    UNASSIGNED: Our predefined search identified 1983 hits, we selected 218 hits and retrieved full-text copies of these. 144 studies were included in the review.
    UNASSIGNED: This review summarizes the current knowledge and evidence on non-uterine abdominal and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas. The review has revealed a lack of high-quality evidence, and randomized clinical trials. There is a great need for more substantial and high-quality research in the area of leiomyosarcomas of the abdomen and retroperitoneum.
    UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO, identifier, CRD42023480527.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对于晚期或转移性腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)患者,主要指南推荐以蒽环类药物为基础的化疗,包括阿霉素单药治疗;然而,很少有研究报道阿霉素单药治疗这些患者的结局.我们在此研究了在现实世界临床实践中,阿霉素单一疗法对晚期或转移性RPS患者的肿瘤疗效和安全性。
    方法:16例诊断为晚期或转移性腹膜后肉瘤,我们分析了2017年2月至2023年3月在我们机构接受多柔比星单药治疗作为一线治疗的情况.响应率,无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS),对不良事件(AE)情况进行回顾性调查.
    结果:患者的中位年龄为69.5岁。对阿霉素的最佳反应如下:完全反应,0例(0.0%);部分缓解,3(18.8%);病情稳定,9(56.3%);和进行性疾病,4(25.0%)。客观有效率和疾病控制率分别为18.8%和75.0%,分别。在观察期间(中位数,22个月,范围=2-53个月),中位PFS和OS期为8.0和24.0个月,分别。发生以下不良事件≥3级:14例患者(87.5%)中性粒细胞减少,发热性中性粒细胞减少5例(31.3%),2例白细胞减少症(12.5%),1例血小板减少症(6.3%),和心力衰竭在1(6.3%)。没有发生≥3级恶心和呕吐,也没有与治疗相关的死亡。
    结论:在现实世界的临床实践中,多柔比星单药治疗RPS的肿瘤学结果不逊于EORTC试验。血液学不良事件发生率较高;然而,预防性止吐药可预防严重的胃肠道AE,且无治疗相关死亡.总的来说,对于晚期或转移性RPS患者,使用适当的预防剂进行阿霉素单一疗法是有效的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: Anthracycline-based chemotherapies including doxorubicin monotherapy are recommended in major guidelines for patients with advanced or metastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS); however, few studies have reported the outcomes of doxorubicin monotherapy for these patients. We herein investigated the oncological efficacy and safety of doxorubicin monotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic RPS in real-world clinical practice.
    METHODS: Sixteen patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma, receiving doxorubicin monotherapy as first-line treatment between February 2017 and March 2023 at our Institution were analyzed. Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) periods, overall survival (OS) period, and adverse event (AE) profiles were retrospectively investigated.
    RESULTS: The median age of patients was 69.5 years. Best responses to doxorubicin were as follows: complete response, 0 patients (0.0%); partial response, 3 (18.8%); stable disease, 9 (56.3%); and progressive disease, 4 (25.0%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 18.8 and 75.0%, respectively. During the observation period (median, 22 months, range=2-53 months), median PFS and OS periods were 8.0 and 24.0 months, respectively. The following AEs Grade ≥3 occurred: neutropenia in 14 patients (87.5%), febrile neutropenia in 5 (31.3%), leukopenia in 2 (12.5%), thrombocytopenia in 1 (6.3%), and heart failure in 1 (6.3%). Grade ≥3 nausea and vomiting did not occur and there was no treatment-related death.
    CONCLUSIONS: The oncological outcomes of doxorubicin monotherapy for RPS in real-world clinical practice were not inferior to those of the EORTC trial. The incidence of hematological AEs was higher; however, severe gastrointestinal AEs were prevented by prophylactic antiemetics and there were no treatment-related deaths. Collectively, doxorubicin monotherapy with appropriate prophylactic agents is a valid option for patients with advanced or metastatic RPS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)是一种罕见的疾病。RPS侵入腹主动脉极为罕见,预后不良。有分散的RPS病例采用联合腹主动脉置换术治疗。然而,这些病例的平均生存时间仅为8个月,2年生存率为21%,表明预后不良。在这个案例研究中,一名44岁的男子出现在我们医院,抱怨腹痛。多项影像学发现提示腹膜后肿块被诊断为恶性肿瘤。由于RPS肿瘤侵入腹主动脉,该患者接受了腹主动脉置换的肿瘤切除术。组织病理学分级确定为3级,恶性程度最高的肿瘤,根据国家癌症中心的分级系统。术后给予阿霉素和异环磷酰胺化疗五个周期。手术后患者存活超过8年,无复发。该病例显示需要腹主动脉置换的RPS长期存活。
    Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease. RPS invading the abdominal aorta is exceedingly rare and has a poor prognosis. There have been scattered cases of RPS treated with combined abdominal aortic replacement. However, the average survival time for these cases was only 8 months, with a 2-year survival rate of 21%, indicating a poor prognosis. In this case study, a 44-year-old man presented to our hospital complaining of abdominal pain. Multiple imaging findings suggested a retroperitoneal mass that was diagnosed as a malignant tumor. The patient underwent tumor resection with abdominal aortic replacement due to an RPS tumor invading the abdominal aorta. The histopathological grade was determined to be grade 3, the most malignant grade tumor, according to the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer grading system. Postoperative chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide was administered for five cycles. The patient has been alive for over 8 years after the operation without any recurrence. This case presents a long-term survival of RPS requiring abdominal aortic replacement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:恶性神经鞘瘤是来源于神经周细胞的神经鞘瘤的一种罕见的恶性对应物。切除是治疗恶性神经鞘瘤的主要选择;然而,患者经常在切除后复发,需要建立对晚期或复发性病变的有效治疗方法。这份报告描述了一名51岁的女性,患有腹膜后罕见的恶性神经鞘瘤,为文学贡献了宝贵的见解。
    方法:患者出现腹胀,影像学检查显示腹膜后巨大出血性肿瘤,下腔静脉被肿瘤阻塞。患者接受了手术切除肿瘤,并伴有左半侧和肝后腔静脉,根据组织病理学和免疫组织化学检查证实了恶性神经鞘瘤的诊断。癌症基因组测试鉴定了NF2中的突变。术后2个月进行腹膜播散放疗,患者在手术后6个月死于疾病进展。
    结论:这一罕见病例凸显了治疗腹膜后恶性神经鞘瘤的挑战。晚期恶性神经鞘瘤的侵袭性特征和有限的治疗选择强调了了解发病机理和开发有效的全身疗法的必要性。NF2突变的鉴定提供了对潜在治疗靶标的重要见解。
    BACKGROUND: Malignant perineurioma is a rare malignant counterpart of perineurioma derived from perineural cells. Resection is the primary option for the treatment of malignant perineuriomas; however, patients often develop recurrence after resection, and effective treatment for advanced or recurrent lesions needs to be established. This report describes a 51-year-old female with a rare malignant perineurioma in the retroperitoneum, which contributing valuable insights to the literature.
    METHODS: The patient presented with abdominal distension and the imaging work-up revealed a huge hemorrhagic tumor in the retroperitoneum and obstruction of inferior vena cava by the tumor. The patient underwent surgery retrieving the tumor combined with left hemiliver and retrohepatic vena cava, which confirmed the diagnosis of a malignant perineurioma based on histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. Cancer gene panel testing identified mutations in NF2. Radiotherapy was administered for peritoneal dissemination 2 months after surgery, and the patient died from disease progression 6 months after surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: This rare case highlights the challenges in managing retroperitoneal malignant perineuriomas. The aggressive characteristics and limited treatment options for advanced malignant perineuriomas underscore the need for understanding the pathogenesis and developing effective systemic therapies. The identification of an NF2 mutation provides significant insights into potential therapeutic target.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    低度纤维粘液样肉瘤是一种罕见的深部软组织肉瘤,很少发生在年轻人和儿童中。尽管手术切除提供了长期预后,可发生晚期局部复发和转移。
    一名44岁女性,无既往病史,出现呼吸和腹部不适。对比增强计算机断层扫描显示腹膜后肿瘤突出到胸腔,左侧有胸腔积液。肿瘤活检显示肉瘤。我们对肿瘤以及隔膜的一部分进行了完全切除,并用假体补片代替了隔膜。组织病理学结果提示低度纤维粘液样肉瘤。患者无术后并发症,未接受辅助治疗。此外,她在手术后存活了4年,没有复发。
    完整的手术切除对低级别纤维粘液样肉瘤有效;因此,当活检显示恶性发现时,适当计划完全切除是很重要的。
    UNASSIGNED: Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma is an uncommon deep-seated soft-tissue sarcoma that occurs rarely in young adults and children. Although surgical resection provides a long-term prognosis, late local recurrence and metastasis may occur.
    UNASSIGNED: A 44-year-old woman with no prior medical history presented with breathing and abdominal discomfort. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan revealed a retroperitoneal tumor protruding into the thoracic cavity and pleural effusion on the left side. Tumor biopsy revealed sarcoma. We performed complete resection of the tumor along with part of the diaphragm and replaced the diaphragm with a prosthetic patch. Histopathologic findings indicated low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. The patient experienced no postoperative complications and received no adjuvant therapy. Furthermore, she survived 4 years after surgery without recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: Complete surgical resection is effective for low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma; therefore, it is important to plan appropriately for complete resection when biopsy reveals malignant findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    需要开发不可切除的腹膜后肉瘤的有效治疗策略。在这里,我们建议确定性质子治疗(PT)可能是一种有希望的治疗选择,不管肿瘤的大小。一名52岁的男子出现下腹部不适。计算机断层扫描显示腹膜后肿瘤,最大尺寸超过20厘米,被胃肠道(GI)包围。活检显示去分化脂肪肉瘤。新辅助化疗无效,肿瘤最终被认为是不可切除的.患者选择接受PT而不是继续化疗。在16个部分中采用总剂量为60.8Gy(相对生物有效性)的点扫描PT(SSPT)。SSPT向肿瘤施用一定剂量,同时成功地保留了周围的胃肠道。他在PT后没有接受任何维持系统治疗。肿瘤在7年多的时间里逐渐缩小,没有证据表明在照射场外复发。最初可测量的肿瘤体积为2925cc,在最后一次随访时减少到214cc,PT后七年半。病人还活着,没有任何严重的并发症。
    The development of effective treatment strategies for unresectable retroperitoneal sarcoma is desirable. Herein, we suggest that definitive proton therapy (PT) could be a promising treatment option, regardless of the large size of the tumor. A 52-year-old man presented with a discomfort of the lower abdomen. Computed tomography revealed a retroperitoneal tumor, measuring over 20 cm in the largest dimensions, which was surrounded by the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Biopsy revealed dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was ineffective, and the tumor was ultimately deemed unresectable. The patient opted to receive PT instead of continuation of chemotherapy. Spot scanning PT (SSPT) at a total dose of 60.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions was employed. SSPT administered a dose to the tumor while successfully sparing the surrounding GI tract. He did not receive any maintenance systemic therapy after PT. The tumor gradually shrunk over more than 7 years, with no evidence of recurrence outside the irradiation field. The initial measurable tumor volume of 2925 cc decreased to 214 cc at the final follow-up, seven and a half years after PT. The patient is alive without any severe complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    考虑到腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)手术期间大出血的高风险,严重的并发症和死亡是常见的围手术期。因此,有效的麻醉管理是保证患者安全的关键。本研究旨在介绍手术期间接受大量输血的RPS患者的麻醉管理和死亡率。
    从我们的数据库中回顾性检索了2016年1月至2021年12月全身麻醉下RPS手术的记录。最终将在24小时内接受超过20单位的大量输血(MBT)的患者纳入本研究。人口统计,麻醉管理方式,失血,输血,收集围麻醉生化检查以及发病率和死亡率。采用统计学软件STATA17.0进行单因素和多因素分析,确定术后60d死亡的危险因素。
    共纳入70例患者(男性31例)。平均年龄为50.1±15.8岁。所有患者均在全身麻醉下接受了累及器官的肉瘤联合切除。平均手术时间和麻醉时间分别为491.7±131.1分钟和553.9±132.6分钟,分别。术中出血量中位数为7000ml(IQR5500,10000ml)。红细胞(RBC)和新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)的中位数为25.3u(IQR20,28u),和2400ml(IQR2000,3000ml),分别。其他血液制品输注包括凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCCs),纤维蛋白原浓缩物(FC),血小板(plt)和白蛋白(alb)占82.9%(58/70),88.6%(62/70),81.4%(57/70)和12.9%(9/70)的患者。术后严重并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo分级≥3a)为35.7%(25/70)。在术后60天期间,共有7名患者(10%)死亡。BMI,麻醉中的晶体输注量,单因素分析发现手术终止时的血红蛋白和乳酸水平与术后死亡发生显著相关。在逻辑多变量分析中,麻醉时间延长与术后静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)和严重并发症相关.术后即刻乳酸水平是影响围手术期死亡的唯一危险因素(p<0.05)。
    在手术中忍受MBT的RPS患者术后面临更高的死亡风险,这需要在高容量RPS中心进行精确有效的麻醉管理。血乳酸水平升高可能是术后死亡的预测因素,应注意。
    UNASSIGNED: Given high risks of major bleeding during retroperitoneal sarcoma(RPS) surgeries, severe complications and deaths are common to see perioperatively. Thus, effective anesthetic management is the key point to ensuring the safety of patients. This study aimed to introduce anesthesia management and mortalities in RPS patients receiving massive blood transfusions during surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: Records of RPS surgeries under general anesthesia from January 2016 through December 2021 were retrospectively retrieved from our database. Patients who received massive blood transfusions (MBT) exceeding 20 units in 24h duration of operations were finally included in this study. Demographics, modalities of anesthesia management, blood loss, transfusion, peri-anesthesia biochemical tests as well as morbidities and mortalities were collected. Risk factors of postoperative 60d mortality were determined through logistic regression in uni-and multi-variety analysis using the statistics software STATA 17.0.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 70 patients (male 31) were included. The mean age was 50.1 ± 15.8 years. All patients received combined resections of sarcoma with involved organs under general anesthesia. Mean operation time and anesthesia time were 491.7 ± 131.1mins and 553.9 ± 132.6mins, respectively. The median intraoperative blood loss was 7000ml (IQR 5500,10000ml). Median red blood cells (RBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion were 25.3u (IQR 20,28u), and 2400ml (IQR 2000,3000ml), respectively. Other blood products infusions included prothrombin complex concentrate (PCCs), fibrinogen concentrate (FC), platelet(plt) and albumin(alb) in 82.9% (58/70), 88.6% (62/70), 81.4% (57/70) and 12.9% (9/70) of patients. The postoperative severe complication rate(Clavien-Dindo grade≥3a) was 35.7%(25/70). A total of 7 patients (10%) died during the postoperative 60-day period. BMI, volumes of crystalloid infusion in anesthesia, and hemoglobin and lactate levels at the termination of operation were found significantly associated with postoperative occurrence of death in univariate analysis. In logistic multivariate analysis, extended anesthesia duration was found associated with postoperative venous thrombosis embolism (VTE) and severe complication. The lactate level at the immediate termination of the operation was the only risk factor related to perioperative death (p<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: RPS patients who endure MBT in surgeries face higher risks of death postoperatively, which needs precise and effective anesthesia management in high-volume RPS centers. Increased blood lactate levels might be predictors of postoperative deaths which should be noted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)的手术中增加放射治疗(RT)仍然存在争议。我们检查了随着时间的推移RPS患者使用RT的实践模式,国家队列。
    方法:纳入国家癌症数据库(2004-2017)中接受RPS切除术的患者。使用具有Cochran-Armitage趋势测试的列联表计算比例随时间的趋势。
    结果:在接受切除术的7,485例患者中,1,821(24.3%)接受RT(佐剂:59.9%,新辅助:40.1%)。RT的使用每年减少<1%(p=0.0178)。新辅助RT平均每年增加13%,而辅助RT平均每年减少6%(p<0.0001)。在高容量中心(OR14.795,p<0.0001)和肿瘤>10cm(OR2.009,p=0.001)的治疗与新辅助RT相关。相反,脂肪肉瘤(OR0.574,p=0.001)与佐剂RT相关。仅接受手术治疗的患者与接受手术和RT治疗的患者之间的总生存率没有统计学上的显着差异(p=0.07)。
    结论:在美国,随着时间的推移,RPS对RT的使用有所减少,向新辅助RT转变。然而,很大比例的患者仍在接受辅助放疗,这主要发生在低容量医院.
    BACKGROUND: The addition of radiation therapy (RT) to surgery in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial. We examined practice patterns in the use of RT for patients with RPS over time in a large, national cohort.
    METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017) who underwent resection of RPS were included. Trends over time for proportions were calculated using contingency tables with Cochran-Armitage Trend test.
    RESULTS: Of 7,485 patients who underwent resection, 1,821 (24.3%) received RT (adjuvant: 59.9%, neoadjuvant: 40.1%). The use of RT decreased annually by < 1% (p = 0.0178). There was an average annual increase of neoadjuvant RT by 13% compared to an average annual decrease of adjuvant RT by 6% (p < 0.0001). Treatment at high-volume centers (OR 14.795, p < 0.0001) and tumor > 10 cm (OR 2.009, p = 0.001) were associated with neoadjuvant RT. In contrast liposarcomas (OR 0.574, p = 0.001) were associated with adjuvant RT. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with surgery alone versus surgery and RT (p = 0.07).
    CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, the use of RT for RPS has decreased over time, with a shift towards neoadjuvant RT. However, a large percentage of patients are still receiving adjuvant RT and this mostly occurs at low-volume hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)是间充质起源的罕见肿瘤,通常在诊断时表现为巨大的肿瘤块。我们调查了身体成分对原发性局部RPS手术患者预后的影响。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了1999年至2020年间在我们机构接受原发性RPS手术的所有患者的数据。术前骨骼肌面积(SMA),使用计算机断层扫描在第三腰椎水平计算内脏和皮下脂肪组织面积(VAT和SAT)和肌肉辐射衰减(MRA)。应用欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组(EWGSOP2)标准来定义肌肉减少症。使用最大对数秩统计方法,我们确定了身体成分参数的最佳截止值。基于确定的MRA截止值定义肌骨形成。
    结果:共有58名患者符合研究条件。中位随访时间为116个月,估计的5年总生存率(OS)和无局部复发生存率(LRFS)分别为66.8%和77.6%,分别。与非肌肉减少症患者相比,肌肉减少症患者的5年OS显着降低(p=0.009)。骨骼肌指数和皮下脂肪组织指数预测单变量分析的LRFS(分别为p=0.052和p=0.039)。在多变量分析中,高内脏与皮下脂肪组织面积比(VSR)独立预测术后并发症发生率较高(89.2%vs.10.8%,p=0.008)。肌肉骨化与较高的术后发病率相关。
    结论:肌减少症影响生存率,但不是RPS的术后结果。内脏肥胖,VSR(>0.26)和肌骨形成与较高的术后发病率相关。在RPS中,VSR比VAT是更好的预后因子。
    BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumours of mesenchymal origin, commonly presented as a large tumour mass at time of diagnosis. We investigated the impact of body composition on outcome in patients operated on for primary localized RPS.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data for all patients operated on for primary RPS at our institution between 1999 and 2020. Preoperative skeletal muscle area (SMA), visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue area (VAT and SAT) and muscle radiation attenuation (MRA) were calculated using computed tomography scans at the level of third lumbar vertebra. European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) criteria were applied to define myopenia. Using maximum log-rank statistic method we determined the optimal cut-off values of body composition parameters. Myosteatosis was defined based on determined MRA cut-offs.
    RESULTS: In total 58 patient were eligible for the study. With a median follow-up of 116 months, the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and local-recurrence free survival (LRFS) were 66.8% and 77.6%, respectively. Patients with myopenia had significantly lower 5-year OS compared to non-myopenic (p = 0.009). Skeletal muscle index and subcutaneous adipose tissue index predicted LRFS on univariate analysis (p = 0.052 and p = 0.039, respectively). In multivariate analysis high visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR) independently predicted higher postoperative complication rate (89.2% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.008). Myosteatosis was associated with higher postoperative morbidity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Myopenia affected survival, but not postoperative outcome in RPS. Visceral obesity, VSR (> 0.26) and myosteatosis were associated with higher postoperative morbidity. VSR was better prognostic factor than VAT in RPS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)是一种罕见的肿瘤,分为许多组织学类型。它也通常只有在它生长到相当大的尺寸并且需要对周围器官进行广泛切除之后才被检测到,这使得很难提供最佳的患者定制管理。支持RPS特定治疗方式的证据不足,由于它的稀有性。日本RPS临床实践指南于2021年12月发布,旨在积累现有证据并指出RPS的最佳实践。这些指南提供了有关RPS诊断和治疗的重要临床问题(CQs)。这次审查,特别关注初级RPS,尝试在RPS的诊断和治疗中引入临床问题,并评估这些问题以及指南中的CQ。根据这些准则,虽然化疗和放疗有望起到治疗作用,目前支持这些治疗的证据水平不是很高。因此,完全切除肿瘤是治疗原发性RPS的首选也是唯一的选择.然而,和其他肿瘤一样,对RPS的多学科治疗的需求正在增加。这些指南无疑将代表未来与RPS相关的临床实践的里程碑。预计将根据已提出的CQ积累进一步的证据。
    Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare tumor classified into many histological types. It is also often detected only after it has grown to a considerable size and requires extensive resection of the surrounding organs, making it difficult to offer optimal patient-tailored management. Evidence supporting specific treatment modalities for RPS is insufficient, owing to its rarity. The Japanese clinical practice guidelines for RPS were published in December 2021, with the aim of accumulating existing evidence and indicating the optimal practice for RPS. These guidelines provide important clinical questions (CQs) concerning the diagnosis and treatment of RPS. This review, with a particular focus on primary RPS, attempts to introduce clinical problems in the diagnosis and treatment of RPS and to assess those problems along with the CQs in the guidelines. According to these guidelines, although chemotherapy and radiotherapy are expected to have therapeutic effects, the level of evidence to support these treatments is not very high at present. Accordingly, complete resection of the tumor is the first and only option for managing primary RPS. However, as with other tumors, the demand for multidisciplinary treatment for RPS is increasing. These guidelines will undoubtedly represent a milestone in clinical practice in relation to RPS in the future, and further evidence is expected to be accumulated based on the CQs that have been proposed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号