retroperitoneal sarcoma

腹膜后肉瘤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)的术前活检可实现适当的多学科治疗计划。对1990年至2022年6月的文献进行了系统回顾,使用人口,干预,比较和结局模型,以评估术前活检与未活检的局部复发和总生存期。在筛选的3192项研究中,纳入5项回顾性队列研究.三次报告活检针道播种,只有一项研究报告活检部位复发2%。两个发现局部复发没有显着差异,一个发现在没有进行活检的人中5年局部复发率更高。三项研究报告了总生存率,包括一个倾向匹配的,没有显示总生存期的差异。总之,RPS术前芯针活检与局部复发或不良生存结局无关.
    Preoperative biopsy for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) enables appropriate multidisciplinary treatment planning. A systematic review of literature from 1990 to June 2022 was conducted using the population, intervention, comparison and outcome model to evaluate the local recurrence and overall survival of preoperative biopsy compared to those that had not. Of 3192 studies screened, five retrospective cohort studies were identified. Three reported on biopsy needle tract seeding, with only one study reporting biopsy site recurrence of 2 %. Two found no significant difference in local recurrence and one found higher 5-year local recurrence rates in those who had not been biopsied. Three studies reported overall survival, including one with propensity matching, did not show a difference in overall survival. In conclusion, preoperative core needle biopsy of RPS is not associated with increased local recurrence or adverse survival outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:在原发性局部可切除腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)中,尽管进行了最佳的手术治疗,但仍经常发生局部区域和远处复发。化疗在改善预后中的作用尚不清楚。
    方法:进行了系统评价,利用人口,干预,比较结果(PICO)模型,评估新辅助或辅助化疗是否能改善原发性局部可切除RPS成人的预后。Medline,从1946年到2022年6月,Embase和CochraneCentral被问及评估无复发生存率的出版物。总生存率,和术后并发症。每个研究都由两名独立的审阅者筛选适合性。对结果进行定性合成。
    结果:确定了23项研究;一项回顾性研究的荟萃分析和22项回顾性研究,包括3项倾向匹配队列。大多数研究没有通过组织学分析结果,详细的治疗方案,提供接受化疗的患者的基线特征或选择标准。在几项研究中说明了选择偏倚的证据。Newcastle-Ottawa回顾性队列研究12项研究质量良好,10项研究质量较差。所有研究均被澳大利亚NHMRC等级评估为III-2级证据。总的来说,在手术中增加新辅助或辅助化疗与局部复发的改善无关,无转移生存率,原发性局部可切除RPS的无病生存期或总生存期。有一些证据表明化疗与较差的总体生存率有关。一项单中心研究表明,与单纯手术相比,新辅助化疗与原发性局部可切除RPS的术后并发症增加无关。
    结论:目前没有证据表明在手术中加入化疗可以改善原发性局部可切除RPS的成年患者的预后。现有证据因其回顾性性质和选择偏倚的可能性高而受到限制,通常对复发风险较高的患者和许多未在高容量肉瘤中心接受治疗的患者进行化疗。需要随机试验来最终确定化疗在原发性局部可切除RPS中的作用。
    BACKGROUND: In primary localised resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), loco-regional and distant relapse occur frequently despite optimal surgical management. The role of chemotherapy in improving outcomes is unclear.
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted, using the population, intervention, comparison outcome (PICO) model, to evaluate whether neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in adults with primary localised resectable RPS. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were queried for publications from 1946 to June 2022 that evaluated recurrence free survival, overall survival, and post operative complications. Each study was screened by two independent reviewers for suitability. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed.
    RESULTS: Twenty three studies were identified; one meta-analysis of retrospective studies and 22 retrospective studies including three with propensity matched cohorts. Most studies did not analyse outcomes by histology, detail treatment regimens, provide baseline characteristics or selection criteria for those receiving chemotherapy. Evidence of selection bias was illustrated in several studies. Newcastle-Ottawa quality of retrospective cohort studies was good for 12 studies and poor for 10 studies. All studies were assessed as Level III-2 evidence by the Australian NHMRC hierarchy. Overall, the addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery was not associated with improvement in local recurrence, metastasis free survival, disease free survival or overall survival in primary localised resectable RPS. There is some evidence of an association of chemotherapy with worse overall survival. One single centre study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with increased post operative complications compared to surgery alone in primary localised resectable RPS.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence that demonstrates the addition of chemotherapy to surgery improves outcomes in adult patients with primary localised resectable RPS. Available evidence is limited by its retrospective nature and high likelihood of selection bias with chemotherapy generally administered to patients at higher risk of recurrence and many patients not receiving care in high volume sarcoma centres. Randomised trials are required to conclusively determine the role of chemotherapy in primary localised resectable RPS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然手术是治疗局部腹膜后肉瘤的主要手段,放疗(RT)的使用仍然存在争议。本系统综述旨在评估RT在腹膜后肉瘤中的作用。使用人口的系统评价,干预,比较,和结果模型从1990年到2022年确定了66项研究(术前和术后RT的混合);一项随机对照试验(RCT)有两个出版物,18项登记研究,46项回顾性研究。在术前RT的RCT中,局部/腹部复发无差异.这项RCT和一项回顾性研究的汇总分析显示,术前RT对低度脂肪肉瘤具有显着的无腹部复发生存益处。RCT和大多数回顾性研究发现,RT不能改善无复发生存率(16个中的11个在合并的局部和远处RFS中没有差异,13个中的11个无远处转移生存率),疾病特异性生存率(12项研究中的9项)或总生存率(49项研究中的33项)。大多数研究发现RT与围手术期发病率之间没有关联。总之,术前RT可改善低度(高分化或1-2级去分化)脂肪肉瘤的局部控制,但不是其他组织学亚型。没有强有力的证据表明围手术期放疗提供了总体生存益处。低级别腹膜后脂肪肉瘤患者可考虑术前RT以提高无腹腔复发生存率。在这种情况下,多学科团队应与患者一起仔细讨论证据的基本原理和水平。RT不应常规推荐用于其他组织学亚型。
    While surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localised retroperitoneal sarcoma, the use of radiotherapy (RT) remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the role of RT for retroperitoneal sarcoma. A systematic review using the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome model from 1990 to 2022 identified 66 studies (a mixture of preoperative and postoperative RT); one randomised controlled trial (RCT) with two publications, 18 registry studies, and 46 retrospective studies. In the RCT of preoperative RT, there was no difference in local/abdominal recurrence. The pooled analysis of this RCT and a retrospective study showed a significant abdominal recurrence free survival benefit with preoperative RT in low grade liposarcoma. The RCT and the majority of retrospective series found RT did not improve recurrence free survival (11 of 16 no difference in combined local and distant RFS, 11 of 13 no difference in distant metastasis free survival), disease specific survival (9 of 12 studies) or overall survival (33 of 49 studies). The majority of studies found no association between RT and perioperative morbidity. In summary, preoperative RT may improve local control for low grade (well-differentiated or grades 1-2 dedifferentiated) liposarcoma, but not other histological subtypes. There is no strong evidence that perioperative RT provides an overall survival benefit. Patients with low grade retroperitoneal liposarcoma can be considered for preoperative RT to improve abdominal recurrence free survival. The rationale and level of evidence in this scenario should be carefully discussed by the multidisciplinary team with patients. RT should not be routinely recommended for other histological subtypes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The incidence of retroperitoneal tumor is low, and treatment is difficult.According to the recent updates of evidence-based medical evidence at home and abroad, the consensus on the standardized treatment of retroperitoneal tumors were discussed including examination and diagnosis , surgical treatment comprehensive treatment, nutrition, rehabilitation, and review and follow-up, etc.
    腹膜后肿瘤发病率低,治疗困难,术后复发率高。国内尚缺乏全国性、规范性腹膜后肿瘤诊治指南或共识。根据近年国内外循证医学证据,以及中国学者对腹膜后肿瘤研究的不断深入,我们对腹膜后肿瘤的规范化诊治进行了探讨,包括腹膜后肿瘤的检查、诊断、外科治疗、综合治疗、营养康复以及复查和随访等。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Radiation therapy represents an essential treatment option in the management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Brachytherapy represents an important subset of radiation therapy techniques used for STS, with evolving indications and applications. Therefore, the purpose of this guideline was to update clinicians regarding the data surrounding brachytherapy (BT) and provide recommendations for the utilization of BT in patients with STS.
    Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in STS, and STS BT in particular, created an updated guideline for the use of BT in STS based on a literature review and clinical experience.
    Guidelines are presented with respect to dose and fractionation and technical features to improve outcomes and potentially reduce the risk of toxicity. Brachytherapy as monotherapy can be considered in low-risk cases or in situations where re-irradiation is being considered. Brachytherapy boost can be considered in cases at higher risk of recurrence or where BT alone cannot adequately cover the target volume. To limit wound complications, the start of BT delivery should be delayed until final wound closure, or if after immediate reconstruction, started after postoperative Day 5.
    The current guidelines have been created to provide clinicians with a review of the data supporting BT in the management of STS as well as providing indications and technique guidelines to ensure optimal patient selection and clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号