prognostic markers

预后标志物
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    四阴性乳腺癌(QNBC)是缺乏雄激素(AR)受体表达的三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)亚型。很少有研究关注这种高度侵袭性的乳腺癌,预示着更低的存活率。我们旨在确定以下内容:(1)QNBC的分子和临床特征,并将其与其他亚型进行比较;(2)QNBC与临床病理因素和预后标志物的关联。我们对202名非裔美国女性的乳腺浸润性导管癌FFPE肿瘤块的组织肿瘤微阵列进行了ARs的免疫组织化学评估。使用卡方检验进行单变量分析,生存率使用Kaplan-Meier曲线计算。总的来说,75.8%的TNBC为AR阴性。与腔亚型相比,TNBC和QNBC肿瘤的分级可能较高(p<0.001);HER2+/AR-和QNBCs也大于其他亚型(p<0.001)。他们还表达了参与入侵的蛋白质的平均水平增加,比如CD44,Fascin,还有波形蛋白,以及减少参与乳腺分化的蛋白质的表达,如GATA3和乳腺球蛋白。我们发现QNBC和舞台之间没有关联,无复发生存率,或总体生存率。这些女性中TNBCAR阴性的高患病率可以解释观察到的更糟糕的结果,支持独特的QNBC亚型的存在。
    Quadruple-negative breast cancer (QNBC) is a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype that lacks expression of the androgen (AR) receptor. Few studies have focused on this highly aggressive breast cancer, portending worse survival rates. We aimed to determine the following: (1) QNBC\'s molecular and clinical characteristics and compare them with other subtypes and (2) QNBC\'s association with clinicopathological factors and prognostic markers. We performed immunohistochemical evaluations of ARs on tissue tumor microarrays from FFPE tumor blocks of invasive ductal breast carcinomas in 202 African American women. Univariate analysis was performed using the chi-square test, with survival rates calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Overall, 75.8% of TNBCs were AR-negative. Compared to the luminal subtypes, TNBC and QNBC tumors were likely to be a higher grade (p < 0.001); HER2+/AR- and QNBCs were also larger than the other subtypes (p < 0.001). They also expressed increasing mean levels of proteins involved in invasion, such as CD44, fascin, and vimentin, as well as decreasing the expression of proteins involved in mammary differentiation, such as GATA3 and mammaglobin. We found no association between QNBC and stage, recurrence-free survival, or overall survival rates. The high prevalence of TNBC AR-negativity in these women could explain observed worse outcomes, supporting the existence of the unique QNBC subtype.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种高度侵袭性的肿瘤,尽管努力开发新的治疗策略,但总生存期(OS)仍然很差.在第二行,托泊替康是唯一被批准的药物,中位OS为5.9个月。然而,与研究人群相比,现实世界中的SCLC患者通常情况更差,并有更多的合并症.因此,托泊替康的实际表现可能与研究中的不同。这里,我们分析了接受托泊替康治疗的SCLC患者的结局,并确定了预测和预后标志物.
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年至2022年间接受托泊替康的44例连续SCLC患者。我们分析了基线特征(年龄,ECOG-PS,托泊替康循环,和剂量)和治疗前的血液值(LDH,CRP,钠)以及预后评分(中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(NLR),血小板/淋巴细胞比率(TLR),格拉斯哥预后评分,预后营养评分,全身炎症指数(SII),和预后指数)从电子患者图中提取,以确定预测和预后标志物。
    结果:在我们的队列中,mPFS和mOS分别只有1.9和5.6个月,分别。性别,ECOG-PS,活跃的脑转移,NLR,GPS,PNI,在单因素分析中,SII显著影响PFS和OS。ECOG-PS(p>0.001),活动性脑转移(p=0.001),在多变量COX回归模型中,SII(p=0.008)是显著的独立预后变量.通过这三种标志物选择患者实现5.7个月的mPFS,因此mPFS增加了三倍。不符合所有标准的患者的mPFS为1.8个月(p=0.006)。通过预后标志物鉴定的患者的mOS为9.1个月(p=0.002)。
    结论:托泊替康在SCLC真实世界患者中的疗效较差,这表明许多患者没有任何获益。易于获得的标志物可以预测反应和治疗效果,因此应在更大的队列中进行验证,以确定更有可能从托泊替康中受益的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive tumor, and overall survival (OS) remains poor despite intensive efforts to develop new treatment strategies. In second line, topotecan is the only approved drug, with a median OS of 5.9 months. However, real-world SCLC patients are often in worse condition and harbor more comorbidities than study populations. Therefore, the real-world performance of topotecan may differ from that seen in studies. Here, we analyzed outcomes of SCLC patients receiving topotecan and identified predictive and prognostic markers.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 44 consecutive SCLC patients receiving topotecan between 2015 and 2022. We analyzed baseline characteristics (age, ECOG-PS, topotecan cycles, and dosage) and pre-treatment blood values (LDH, CRP, sodium) as well as prognostic scores (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), thrombocyte/lymphocyte ratio (TLR), Glasgow Prognostic Score, prognostic nutritional score, systemic inflammation index (SII), and the prognostic index) extracted from electronic patients\' charts to identify predictive and prognostic markers.
    RESULTS: In our cohort, mPFS and mOS were only 1.9 and 5.6 months, respectively. Gender, ECOG-PS, active brain metastases, NLR, GPS, PNI, and SII significantly influenced PFS and OS in univariate analysis. ECOG-PS (p > 0.001), active brain metastases (p = 0.001), and SII (p = 0.008) were significant independent prognostic variables in a multivariate COX regression model. Selecting patients by these three markers achieved an mPFS of 5.7 months and thus increased the mPFS three-fold. Patients not meeting all criteria had an mPFS of 1.8 months (p = 0.006). Patients identified by prognostic markers had an mOS of 9.1 months (p = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of topotecan in SCLC real-world patients is poor, indicating that many patients were treated without any benefit. Easy-to-obtain markers can predict response and treatment efficacy and should therefore be validated in larger cohorts to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from topotecan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胸腺神经内分泌肿瘤(Th-NETs)罕见且具有侵袭性,缺乏预测患者预后的研究。我们的研究旨在评估预后标志物和基于替莫唑胺(TMZ)的化疗对Th-NETs生存率的影响。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2013年至2023年在我们机构诊断为Th-NETs的患者的医疗记录。我们收集了临床病理资料,包括肿瘤病理分级,分期,血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和促胃泌素释放肽的浓度,炎症因子水平,和氧6-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶(MGMT)的表达。还记录了治疗细节(如手术和化疗)和生存结果。
    结果:在排除没有完整可用信息的患者后,共有32例患者被纳入我们的研究。19例接受TMZ化疗的患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为12.5个月(95CI,8-16个月)。21名患者接受了手术作为主要治疗,显示中位无病生存期(DFS)为51.0个月。炎性因子中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是术后患者DFS和TMZ治疗患者PFS的独立预后指标。总体3,5-,10年生存率为86.6%,69.5%,和33.8%,分别。Ki67水平超过10%(p=0.048)和没有手术切除(p=0.003)与较差的总生存率(OS)显着相关。
    结论:手术治疗是目前治疗Th-NETs的主要方法,术后辅助治疗是特定患者队列的重要考虑因素.尽管MGMT广泛表达,基于TMZ的化疗显示出希望。一些潜在的预后生物标志物如NLR和NSE需要更多的关注。
    BACKGROUND: Thymic neuroendocrine tumors (Th-NETs) are rare and aggressive, with a scarcity of research on predicting patient prognosis. Our study aimed to assess the impact of prognostic markers and temozolomide (TMZ)-based chemotherapy on survival in Th-NETs.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with Th-NETs between 2013 and 2023 at our institution. We collected clinicopathological data, including tumor pathological grading, staging, serum concentrations of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide, levels of inflammatory factors, and expression of oxygen 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Treatment details (such as surgery and chemotherapy) and survival outcomes were also documented.
    RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were included in our study after excluding those without complete available information. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.5 months (95%CI, 8-16 months) for 19 patients who received TMZ-based chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients underwent surgery as the primary treatment, demonstrating a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 51.0 months. The inflammatory factor neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent prognostic indicator of DFS in postoperative patients and PFS in TMZ-treated patients. The overall 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 86.6%, 69.5%, and 33.8%, respectively. Ki67 level exceeding 10% (p = 0.048) and absence of surgical resection (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS).
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment was currently the primary method for treating Th-NETs, and postoperative adjuvant therapy was an essential consideration for specific patient cohorts. Despite widespread positive MGMT expression, TMZ-based chemotherapy showed promise. Some potential prognostic biomarkers such as NLR and NSE need more attention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胃癌(GC),恶性上皮肿瘤,是全球癌症相关死亡的第四大原因。GC的治疗策略,尽管面临最大的挑战,通过早期发现和有效的筛查方法可以显著提高生存率。
    为了提供有关多种特定诊断必要性的简要信息,预后,和GC的预测标记。
    这项审查是使用各种搜索引擎进行的,包括PubMedCentral,Scopus,WebofScience,谷歌学者,和其他人。
    提供基本信息的一些潜在生物标志物包括循环肿瘤细胞(CTC),DNA甲基化,claudin18.2,成纤维细胞生长因子受体2(FGFR2),长链非编码RNA(lncRNA),无细胞DNA(cfDNA),microRNAs,和血清胃蛋白酶原。
    多种肿瘤标志物对筛查至关重要,肿瘤鉴定,分期,预后评估,并监测治疗后的复发,因为没有单一的肿瘤诊断指标,预测,并预测GC。
    UNASSIGNED: Gastric cancer (GC), a malignant epithelial tumor, is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Therapeutic strategies for GC, despite the biggest challenges, can significantly improve survival rates through early detection and effective screening methods.
    UNASSIGNED: To provide brief information on the necessity of multiple specific diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers for GC.
    UNASSIGNED: This review was conducted using a variety of search engines, including PubMed Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and others.
    UNASSIGNED: Some potential biomarkers that provide essential information include circulating tumor cells (CTCs), DNA methylation, claudin 18.2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), microRNAs, and serum pepsinogens.
    UNASSIGNED: Multiple tumor markers are essential for screening, tumor identification, staging, prognostic assessment, and monitoring recurrence after therapy due to the absence of a single tumor indicator for diagnosing, prognosticating, and predicting GC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:需要治疗前的生物标志物来确定非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存率可能较差。这确保只有具有真正受益机会的患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗。在这项研究中,我们在接受ICIs治疗的NSCLC患者的真实世界队列中,研究了基线营养和炎症生物标志物与总生存期的相关性.
    方法:我们使用了从OncoLifeS数据生物库收集的前瞻性数据。该队列包括2015年5月至2021年6月接受ICIs治疗的500例晚期NSCLC患者。ICI治疗前2周内评估生物标志物:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,C反应蛋白(CRP),格拉斯哥预后评分,CRP/白蛋白比值(CAR),预后营养指数(PNI),和晚期肺癌炎症指数。对于每个生物标志物,使用基于文献的截止值定义低风险和高风险组.使用调整后的生存分析估计调整后的风险比(aHR)和95%置信区间(95%CIs)。
    结果:大多数患者为男性(60.8%),平均基线年龄为65±9岁,88%患有IV期疾病。对于每个生物标志物,低危患者的总生存率更好(所有,p<0.001),CAR和PNI显示出最强的关联。在多变量分析中,组合的CAR/PNI风险评分与总生存率(aHR3.09,95%CI2.36-4.06)比单独的CAR(aHR2.22,95%CI1.79-2.76)或单独的PNI(aHR2.09,95%CI1.66-2.61)具有更强的相关性。
    结论:这些结果突出了营养和炎症生物标志物的潜在价值,特别是CAR和PNI,在开始ICI治疗前确定死亡风险最高的NSCLC患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Pretreatment biomarkers are needed to identify patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) likely to have worse survival. This ensures that only patients with a real chance of benefit receive immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. In this study, we examined the associations of baseline nutritional and inflammatory biomarkers with overall survival in a real-world cohort of NSCLC patients who received ICIs.
    METHODS: We used prospectively collected data from the OncoLifeS data biobank. The cohort included 500 advanced-stage NSCLC patients treated with ICIs from May 2015 to June 2021. Biomarkers were evaluated within 2 weeks before ICI treatment: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein (CRP), Glasgow prognostic score, CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and advanced lung cancer inflammation index. For each biomarker, low- and high-risk groups were defined using literature-based cut-offs. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using adjusted survival analysis.
    RESULTS: Most patients were male (60.8%), the mean baseline age was 65 ± 9 years, and 88% had stage IV disease. For each biomarker, low-risk patients had better overall survival (all, p < 0.001), with CAR and PNI showing the strongest associations. In multivariable analyses a combined CAR/PNI risk score had a stronger association with overall survival (aHR 3.09, 95% CI 2.36-4.06) than CAR alone (aHR 2.22, 95% CI 1.79-2.76) or PNI alone (aHR 2.09, 95% CI 1.66-2.61).
    CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the potential value of nutritional and inflammatory biomarkers, in particular CAR and PNI, in identifying NSCLC patients with highest mortality risk before starting ICI treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已成为黑色素瘤的有希望的治疗选择,这表明改善了黑色素瘤患者的临床结果,无论特定的基因突变。然而,鉴定用于预测免疫治疗反应和预后的可靠生物标志物仍然是一个挑战.在这项研究中,我们对不同亚型的黑色素瘤患者进行了基因分析,并评估了ICI治疗的疗效.共有221例黑色素瘤患者被纳入我们的队列,主要由肢端淡色黑色素瘤(ALM)组成,皮肤恶性黑色素瘤(CMM),粘膜恶性黑色素瘤(MMM)。遗传分析显示BRAF突变在CMM中占主导地位,而NRAS突变在ALM中普遍存在。还检测到拷贝数变体(CNVs)和结构变体(SV),CCND1和CDK4是CNV和BRAF中受影响最大的基因,ALK和RAF1是SV的药物靶标。此外,NRAS突变与ALM的不良预后相关,而TERT突变与接受PD-1治疗后CMM的不良结局相关.此外,ALK表达在ALM和CMM亚型中均表现出改善的结果。我们的研究提供了中国黑色素瘤患者的全面基因组和病理分析,揭示了疾病的分子景观。此外,基因突变数和ALK表达被鉴定为预后指标.这些发现有助于理解中国人群中的黑色素瘤遗传学,并对个性化治疗方法具有启示意义。
    Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as a promising therapeutic option for melanoma, which demonstrating improved clinical outcomes in melanoma patients regardless of specific genetic mutations. However, the identification of reliable biomarkers for predicting immunotherapy response and prognosis remains a challenge. In this study, we performed genetic profiling of the melanoma patients with different subtypes and evaluated the efficacy of ICI treatment. A total of 221 melanoma patients were included in our cohort, consisting primarily of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM), cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM), and mucosal malignant melanoma (MMM). Genetic analysis revealed BRAF mutations was predominant in CMM and NRAS mutations was prevalent in ALM. Copy number variants (CNVs) and structural variants (SV) were also detected, with CCND1 and CDK4 being the most affected genes in CNV and BRAF, ALK and RAF1 being the druggable targets in SV. Furthermore, NRAS mutations were associated with a poor prognosis in ALM, while TERT mutations were linked to unfavorable outcomes in CMM after receiving PD-1 therapy. Additionally, ALK expression exhibited improved outcomes in both ALM and CMM subtypes. Our study provides a comprehensive genomic and pathological profiling of Chinese melanoma patients, shedding light on the molecular landscape of the disease. Furthermore, numbers of gene mutations and ALK expression were identified as prognostic indicators. These findings contribute to the understanding of melanoma genetics in the Chinese population and have implications for personalized treatment approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性急性肝衰竭(ACLF)的并发症包括短期死亡率增加。肝外器官衰竭是由慢性肝病和急性肝损伤引起的。这种组合表征终末期肝病。它的快速发展使得肝病学家和重症医师治疗具有挑战性。这种情况的不同定义导致不同的临床表现。肝或肝外衰竭在接受额外损伤的慢性乙型肝炎或肝硬化患者中更为普遍。许多强度参数和预后评级,包括那些乙型肝炎病毒(HBV),已经为各种患者和疾病的原因开发和验证。肝再生,肝移植,或HBV相关ACLF的抗病毒治疗是各种器官衰竭的主要治疗目标。LT是HBV-ACLF的最佳治疗方法。在一些HBV相关的ACLF患者,核苷(t)ide类似物和人工肝辅助可以提高存活率。结合流行病学和临床研究,这篇综述更新了我们对HBV-ACLF定义的理解,诊断,流行病学,病因学,治疗,和预后。
    Complications of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) include increased short-term mortality. Extrahepatic organ failures result from chronic liver disease and acute hepatic injury. This combination characterizes end-stage liver disease. Its rapid progression makes it challenging for hepatologists and intensivists to treat. The varied definitions of this condition lead to varied clinical presentations. Hepatic or extrahepatic failures are more prevalent in chronic hepatitis B or cirrhosis patients who receive an additional injury. Numerous intensity parameters and prognosis ratings, including those for hepatitis B virus (HBV), have been developed and verified for various patients and causes of the disease. Liver regeneration, liver transplantation (LT), or antiviral therapy for HBV-related ACLF are the main treatment aims for various organ failures. LT is the best treatment for HBV-ACLF. In some HBV-related ACLF patients, nucleos(t)ide analogs and artificial liver assistance may enhance survival. Combining epidemiological and clinical studies, this review updates our understanding of HBV-ACLF\'s definition, diagnosis, epidemiology, etiology, therapy, and prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    导致癌症的异常细胞增殖和生长主要由累积基因组突变引起。单基因突变本身并不能完全解释癌症的发病和进展;相反,聚集突变-多个突变的同时发生-被认为是癌症发展和进展的关键.这些突变会影响不同的基因和途径,导致细胞发生多种功能异常的恶性转化。聚集突变会影响癌症的生长速度,转移潜能,和药物治疗敏感性。本摘要强调了聚集突变的各种类型和特征,以了解它们与癌变的关系,并讨论了它们在癌症中的潜在临床意义。作为一种独特的突变类型,聚集突变可能涉及基因组不稳定性,DNA修复机制缺陷,和环境暴露,可能与免疫疗法的反应性相关。了解聚集突变的特征和潜在过程可以增强我们对癌发生和癌症进展的理解,为癌症提供新的诊断和治疗方法。
    Abnormal cell proliferation and growth leading to cancer primarily result from cumulative genome mutations. Single gene mutations alone do not fully explain cancer onset and progression; instead, clustered mutations-simultaneous occurrences of multiple mutations-are considered to be pivotal in cancer development and advancement. These mutations can affect different genes and pathways, resulting in cells undergoing malignant transformation with multiple functional abnormalities. Clustered mutations influence cancer growth rates, metastatic potential, and drug treatment sensitivity. This summary highlights the various types and characteristics of clustered mutations to understand their associations with carcinogenesis and discusses their potential clinical significance in cancer. As a unique mutation type, clustered mutations may involve genomic instability, DNA repair mechanism defects, and environmental exposures, potentially correlating with responsiveness to immunotherapy. Understanding the characteristics and underlying processes of clustered mutations enhances our comprehension of carcinogenesis and cancer progression, providing new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中,肝切除术是潜在的治愈。然而,术后复发很常见,发生在高达70%的患者。传统上公认的预测肝癌肝切除术后复发和生存的因素包括病理因素(即,微血管和囊的侵袭)和甲胎蛋白水平的增加。在过去的十年里,据报道,许多新的标志物与HCC切除术后的预后相关:液体活检标志物,基因签名,炎症标志物,和其他生物标志物,包括PIVKA-II,免疫检查点分子,和尿液外泌体中的蛋白质。然而,并不是所有这些新的标志物都可以在临床实践中获得,它们的可重复性尚不清楚。液体活检是预测HCC切除后长期结果的强大而成熟的工具;液体活检的主要限制是由与其技术实施相关的成本代表。已经确定了许多能够预测肝癌根治性肝切除术后生存的基因表达模式,但是关于这些标记的已发表发现是异质的。预后营养指数和不同血细胞比例形式的炎症标志物似乎比其他新兴标志物更容易再现,并且更容易大规模地负担得起。为肝癌患者选择最有效的治疗方法,至关重要的是,科学界必须验证新的可靠且可广泛重复的肿瘤切除术后复发和生存的预测标志物.西方国家的更多报告是必要的,以证实证据。
    In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver resection is potentially curative. Nevertheless, post-operative recurrence is common, occurring in up to 70% of patients. Factors traditionally recognized to predict recurrence and survival after liver resection for HCC include pathologic factors (i.e., microvascular and capsular invasion) and an increase in alpha-fetoprotein level. During the past decade, many new markers have been reported to correlate with prognosis after resection of HCC: liquid biopsy markers, gene signatures, inflammation markers, and other biomarkers, including PIVKA-II, immune checkpoint molecules, and proteins in urinary exosomes. However, not all of these new markers are readily available in clinical practice, and their reproducibility is unclear. Liquid biopsy is a powerful and established tool for predicting long-term outcomes after resection of HCC; the main limitation of liquid biopsy is represented by the cost related to its technical implementation. Numerous patterns of genetic expression capable of predicting survival after curative-intent hepatectomy for HCC have been identified, but published findings regarding these markers are heterogenous. Inflammation markers in the form of prognostic nutritional index and different blood cell ratios seem more easily reproducible and more affordable on a large scale than other emerging markers. To select the most effective treatment for patients with HCC, it is crucial that the scientific community validate new predictive markers for recurrence and survival after resection that are reliable and widely reproducible. More reports from Western countries are necessary to corroborate the evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管已经在胶质母细胞瘤中确定了几种生存的预后因素,还有许多其他潜在的标志物(如血红蛋白),其作用尚未得到证实。这项研究的目的是评估广泛的潜在预后因素,包括HIF-1α和血红蛋白水平,在胶质母细胞瘤中存活。次要目的是确定血红蛋白水平是否与HIF-1α表达相关。方法:对我院2012年至2021年收治的136例胶质母细胞瘤患者进行回顾性研究。进行Cox单变量和多变量分析。产生Kaplan-Meier存活曲线。此外,对关键变量进行双变量非参数相关分析.结果:中位生存期为11.9个月(范围:0-119.4)。根据单变量分析,13个变量与生存率显着相关:年龄,性能状态,手术范围,肿瘤深度,肿瘤大小,癫痫,术后放化疗,IDH突变,CD44,HIF-1α,HIF-1β,波形蛋白,和PDFGR。根据多元回归分析,只有四个变量与生存率显着相关:年龄,手术范围,癫痫,和HIF-1α表达。血红蛋白水平之间未观察到显着关联(女性<120g/L或男性<140g/L与高≥120或≥140g/L)和生存率或HIF-1α/HIF-1β表达。结论:在这项对胶质母细胞瘤患者的回顾性研究中,四个变量-年龄,手术范围,HIF-1α表达,和癫痫-是生存的重要预后因素。血红蛋白水平与生存率或HIF-1α表达无显著相关。尽管缺氧是胶质母细胞瘤微环境的公认组成部分,需要更多的研究来了解肿瘤缺氧的发病机制和治疗意义。
    Background: Although several prognostic factors for survival have been identified in glioblastoma, there are numerous other potential markers (such as hemoglobin) whose role has not yet been confirmed. The aim of this study was to evaluate a wide range of potential prognostic factors, including HIF-1α and hemoglobin levels, for survival in glioblastoma. A secondary aim was to determine whether hemoglobin levels were associated with HIF-1α expression. Methods: A retrospective study of 136 patients treated for glioblastoma at our institution between 2012 and 2021 was performed. Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated. In addition, bivariate non-parametric correlation analyses were performed for key variables. Results: Median survival was 11.9 months (range: 0-119.4). According to the univariate analysis, 13 variables were significantly associated with survival: age, performance status, extent of surgery, tumor depth, tumor size, epilepsy, postoperative chemoradiotherapy, IDH mutations, CD44, HIF-1α, HIF-1β, vimentin, and PDFGR. According to the multivariate regression analysis, only four variables remained significantly associated with survival: age, extent of surgery, epilepsy, and HIF-1α expression. No significant association was observed between hemoglobin levels (low <120 g/L in females or <140 g/L in males vs. high ≥120 or ≥140 g/L) and survival or HIF-1α/HIF-1β expression. Conclusions: In this retrospective study of patients with glioblastoma, four variables-age, extent of surgery, HIF-1α expression, and epilepsy-were significant prognostic factors for survival. Hemoglobin levels were not significantly associated with survival or HIF-1α expression. Although hypoxia is a well-recognized component of the glioblastoma microenvironment, more research is needed to understand the pathogenesis of onset tumor hypoxia and treatment implication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号