Complications of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) include increased short-term mortality. Extrahepatic organ failures result from chronic liver disease and acute hepatic injury. This combination characterizes end-stage liver disease. Its rapid progression makes it challenging for hepatologists and intensivists to treat. The varied definitions of this condition lead to varied clinical presentations. Hepatic or extrahepatic failures are more prevalent in chronic hepatitis B or cirrhosis patients who receive an additional injury. Numerous intensity parameters and prognosis ratings, including those for hepatitis B virus (HBV), have been developed and verified for various patients and causes of the disease. Liver regeneration, liver transplantation (LT), or antiviral therapy for HBV-related ACLF are the main treatment aims for various organ failures. LT is the best treatment for HBV-ACLF. In some HBV-related ACLF patients, nucleos(t)ide analogs and artificial liver assistance may enhance survival. Combining epidemiological and clinical studies, this review updates our understanding of HBV-ACLF\'s definition, diagnosis, epidemiology, etiology, therapy, and prognosis.

In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver resection is potentially curative. Nevertheless, post-operative recurrence is common, occurring in up to 70% of patients. Factors traditionally recognized to predict recurrence and survival after liver resection for HCC include pathologic factors (i.e., microvascular and capsular invasion) and an increase in alpha-fetoprotein level. During the past decade, many new markers have been reported to correlate with prognosis after resection of HCC: liquid biopsy markers, gene signatures, inflammation markers, and other biomarkers, including PIVKA-II, immune checkpoint molecules, and proteins in urinary exosomes. However, not all of these new markers are readily available in clinical practice, and their reproducibility is unclear. Liquid biopsy is a powerful and established tool for predicting long-term outcomes after resection of HCC; the main limitation of liquid biopsy is represented by the cost related to its technical implementation. Numerous patterns of genetic expression capable of predicting survival after curative-intent hepatectomy for HCC have been identified, but published findings regarding these markers are heterogenous. Inflammation markers in the form of prognostic nutritional index and different blood cell ratios seem more easily reproducible and more affordable on a large scale than other emerging markers. To select the most effective treatment for patients with HCC, it is crucial that the scientific community validate new predictive markers for recurrence and survival after resection that are reliable and widely reproducible. More reports from Western countries are necessary to corroborate the evidence.

Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) poses a significant clinical challenge, prompting a focused investigation into the role of KRAS mutations in prognosis and treatment response. Targeted therapies offer promising avenues for intervention, motivating a comprehensive analysis of existing evidence. Conducted in June 2023, our review delved into MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria guided the selection of 12 articles, comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 10 observational studies. Multiple investigators independently executed data extraction, evaluating prognostic factors (overall and progression-free survival) and predictive outcomes (treatment and objective response). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and modified Jadad scores were used for study quality assessment of observational studies and RCTs, respectively. From an initial pool of 120 articles, the 12 selected studies, spanning 2013 to 2022, encompassed 2,845 metastatic NSCLC patients. KRAS mutations, particularly the G12C variant, emerged as a pivotal factor influencing treatment response. Notably, KRAS wild type patients displayed enhanced responses to platinum-based chemotherapy, while those with KRAS mutations exhibited favourable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The role of KRAS mutations as prognostic indicators in metastatic NSCLC is underscored by this systematic review, with implications for both survival and treatment response. The discernment between KRAS wild type and mutant patients offers insights into tailored therapeutic strategies, with platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors emerging as context-dependent options. Nevertheless, more research is required to solidify the predictive role of KRAS and explore the efficacy of KRAS inhibitors and other targeted therapies, paving the way for refined and personalized interventions in the management of metastatic NSCLC.

The purpose of this article is to review the existing English scientific literature and determine the superior modality between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radioembolization (TARE) in the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs). To that end, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. We identified 14 observational studies and no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of TACE or TARE to treat NELM. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the risk of bias in these studies. We concluded that TACE and TARE appeared to have similar outcomes when comparing overall survival, progression-free survival, radiological response, symptomatic response, and the incidence of severe adverse events. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to identify the superior modality conclusively. We also identified several unique prognostic factors for overall survival, such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, volumetric multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and pancreastatin.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer was reported as the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide, in the year 2020. This disease is an important public health problem considering its high incidence and mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The molecular events that lead to colorectal cancer include genetic and epigenetic abnormalities. Some of the most important molecular mechanisms involved include the APC/β-catenin pathway, the microsatellite pathway, and the CpG island hypermethylation. Evidence in the literature supports a role for the microbiota in the development of colon carcinogenesis, and specific microbes may contribute to or prevent carcinogenesis. Progress in prevention, screening, and management has improved the overall prognosis of the disease when diagnosed at an early stage; yet metastatic disease continues to have a poor long-term prognosis due to late-stage diagnosis and treatment failure. Biomarkers are a key tool for early detection and prognosis and aim to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal cancer. The main focus of this narrative review is to provide an update on the recent development of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in stool, blood, and tumor tissue samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The review focuses on recent investigations in microRNAs, cadherins, Piwi-interacting RNAs, circulating cell-free DNA, and microbiome biomarkers which can be applied for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a type of nephropathy that is caused by a diabetic condition. Diabetic nephropathy is seen in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. End-stage renal disorders are brought on by DN. Diabetic nephropathy is thought to be linked to metabolic changes in the body. Proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate are the two most crucial diagnostic and prognosis measures for diabetic kidney disease (DKD), yet both have significant disadvantages. Novel biomarkers are thus increasingly required to improve risk factors and detect disease at an early stage. Controlling blood glucose and vital sign like body temperature and blood pressure, reducing cholesterol levels, and blocking the renin-angiotensin system are the standard treatments for diabetic patients. On the other hand, if used too late within the course of the disease, these therapeutic techniques can only provide partial relief from nephropathy. The complicated pathophysiology of the diabetic kidney, which experiences a variety of severe structural, metabolic, and functional alterations, represents one of the most important obstacles to the event of effective therapeutics for DN. Despite these issues, new diabetes models have identified promising treatment targets by identifying the mechanisms that control important functions of podocytes and glomerular endothelial cells. It has been shown in the vast majority of trials that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors combined with integrative therapies work well for DN. Combining sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers is a novel way to slow down the course of DKD by lowering inflammatory and fibrotic indicators brought on by hyperglycemia, which is more effective than using either medicine alone. Aldosterone receptor inhibitors and advanced glycation end-product inhibitors are two recently produced medications that may be used successfully to treat DN.

Despite advances in cytotoxic treatments, colorectal cancer remains a leading cause of death. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have a poor prognosis despite improved treatments and more prolonged median survival. Monoclonal antibodies like cetuximab and panitumumab target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). They play an essential role in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) due to their efficacy in multiple phase III clinical trials across multiple treatment lines. It was discovered that anti-EGFR moAbs were only effective for a small number of patients. Mutations in KRAS and NRAS have been identified as biomarkers of drug resistance. New molecular predictors and prognostic markers are used clinically. The K-Ras mutation is the first molecular marker of a lack of response to EGFR-targeted therapy in K-Ras-mutant patients. Validating predictive and prognostic markers will improve cancer treatments. This article examines molecular markers that can predict colorectal cancer prognosis.

As is shown in previous reports, arginine vasopressin (AVP), as one of the most important hormones within circulation in human beings, is of great clinically significance given that it could maintain the body fluid balance and vascular tone. However, the laboratory measurements AVP in daily clinical practice are shown to be difficult and with low accuracy. Concerning on this notion, it is unpractical to use the serum levels of AVP in diagnosing multiple diseases. On the other hand, another key serum biomarker, copeptin, is confirmed as the C-terminal of the AVP precursor which could be released in equal amounts with AVP, resultantly making it as a sensitive marker of arginine vasopressin release. Notably, emerging recent evidence has demonstrated the critical function of copeptin as a clinical indicator, especially in the diagnosis and prognosis of several diseases in diverse organs, such as cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, and pulmonary disease. In addition, copeptin was recently verified to play an important role in diagnosing multiple acute diseases when combined it with other gold standard serum biomarkers, indicating that copeptin could be recognized as a vital disease marker. Herein, in the current review, the functions of copeptin as a new predictive diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of various diseases, according to the most recent studies, are well summarized. Furthermore, the importance of using copeptin as a serum biomarker in diverse medical departments and the impact of this on improving healthcare service is also summarized in the current review.

Background and Objectives: Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has led to a high number of mortalities. Immunotherapy, as a first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC, currently has no clarity regarding its prognostic markers to assess the treatment outcome. This systematic review aimed to evaluate neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines, starting from screening for relevant studies from several databases. Each included cohort study was further assessed by using the Newcastle−Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and the available data were extracted for qualitative and quantitative synthesis in pooled and subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 1719 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) outcomes for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for NLR and PLR showed significant results, supporting NLR and PLR as prognostic markers (NLR: HR PFS 2.21 [95% CI: 1.50−3.24; p < 0.0001] and HR OS 2.68 [95% CI: 2.24−3.6; p < 0.0001]; PLR: HR PFS 1.57 [95% CI: 1.33−1.84; p < 0.00001] and HR OS 2.14 [95% CI: 1.72−2.67; p < 0.00001]). Subgroup analysis with a cut-off value of 5 for NLR and 200 for PLR also demonstrated notable outcomes. Higher NLR and PLR levels are associated with poor prognostic. Conclusions: There is considerable evidence regarding both markers as prognostic markers in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. However, further studies with more homogeneous baseline characteristics are required to confirm these findings.

To date, there are no definite imaging predictors for long-term disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the key prognostic tool for MS, primarily at the early stage of the disease. Recent findings showed that white matter lesion (WML) counts and volumes could predict long-term disability for MS. However, the prognostic value of MRI in the early stage of the disease and its link to long-term physical disability have not been assessed systematically and quantitatively. A meta-analysis was conducted using studies from four databases to assess whether MS lesion counts and volumes at baseline MRI scans could predict long-term disability, assessed by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Fifteen studies were eligible for the qualitative analysis and three studies for meta-analysis. T2 brain lesion counts and volumes after the disease onset were associated with disability progression after 10 years. Four or more lesions at baseline showed a highly significant association with EDSS 3 and EDSS 6, with a pooled OR of 4.10 and 4.3, respectively. The risk increased when more than 10 lesions were present. This review and meta-analysis confirmed that lesion counts and volumes could be associated with disability and might offer additional valid guidance in treatment decision making. Future work is essential to determine whether these prognostic markers have high predictive potential.