pharmacoepidemiology

药物流行病学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:乳腺癌的平均10年相对生存率达到84%。这种有利的生存是应该的,在某种程度上,引入生物标志物指导疗法。我们使用趋势-趋势药物流行病学研究设计评估了引入两种辅助疗法-他莫昔芬和曲妥珠单抗对复发的人群水平影响。
    方法:我们确定了丹麦乳腺癌组临床数据库中登记的非转移性乳腺癌女性的数据。我们使用趋势-趋势设计来估计(1)他莫昔芬用于1982年绝经后雌激素受体(ER)阳性乳腺癌妇女,(2)他莫昔芬用于1999年诊断为ER阳性乳腺癌的绝经前妇女,以及(3)曲妥珠单抗用于2007年诊断为人类表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌的60岁以下妇女的人群水平效果。
    结果:对于1999年诊断为ER阳性乳腺癌的绝经前妇女中引入他莫昔芬的人群水平影响,复发风险降低了近一半(OR=0.52),与临床试验的证据一致;然而,估计值不精确(95%置信区间[CI]=0.25,1.85).从1982年开始,我们观察到他莫昔芬的使用与复发之间存在不精确的关联(OR=1.2495%CI=0.46,5.11),与临床试验的先验知识不一致。对于2007年引入曲妥珠单抗,估计也与试验证据一致,虽然不精确(OR=0.51;95%CI=0.21,22.4)。
    结论:我们证明了新的药物流行病学分析设计如何在基于人群的环境中用于评估常规临床护理和治疗进展的有效性,同时考虑了该方法的一些局限性。
    Breast cancer has an average 10-year relative survival reaching 84%. This favorable survival is due, in part, to the introduction of biomarker-guided therapies. We estimated the population-level effect of the introduction of two adjuvant therapies-tamoxifen and trastuzumab-on recurrence using the trend-in-trend pharmacoepidemiologic study design.
    We ascertained data on women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer who were registered in the Danish Breast Cancer Group clinical database. We used the trend-in-trend design to estimate the population-level effect of the introduction of (1) tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer in 1982, (2) tamoxifen for premenopausal women diagnosed with ER-positive breast cancer in 1999, and (3) trastuzumab for women <60 years diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in 2007.
    For the population-level effect of the introduction of tamoxifen among premenopausal women diagnosed with ER-positive breast cancer in 1999, the risk of recurrence decreased by nearly one-half (OR = 0.52), consistent with evidence from clinical trials; however, the estimate was imprecise (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25, 1.85). We observed an imprecise association between tamoxifen use and recurrence from the time it was introduced in 1982 (OR = 1.24 95% CI = 0.46, 5.11), inconsistent with prior knowledge from clinical trials. For the introduction of trastuzumab in 2007, the estimate was also consistent with trial evidence, though imprecise (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.21, 22.4).
    We demonstrated how novel pharmacoepidemiologic analytic designs can be used to evaluate the routine clinical care and effectiveness of therapeutic advancements in a population-based setting while considering some limitations of the approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术药物是肾毒性的常见原因,特别是在急性肾脏疾病(AKD)的背景下,大量病例与药物有关。WHO的VigiBase是识别与AKD发展相关的药物的有力工具。方法我们检索了1968年至2022年期间有关药物不良反应(ADR)通知的数据。根据通过预先选择的参考文献开发的书目评分(BS)评估提取的药物的肾毒性。涉及的主要药物被归类为“非肾毒性”,“潜在的肾毒性”,和“肾毒性”。我们利用IC025和报告比值比(ROR)不成比例指数来研究药物和被纳入AKD通知的几率之间的关系。结果期间,共收到33,932,051份通知书,MedDRA术语过滤后发现435,677例与药物相关的AKD相关的病例,主要影响45-64岁的男性。我们确定了8,991种与AKD发展相关的活性成分或可疑组合,ATCA类-消化道和代谢是最常见的描述。在与这种表型最密切相关的药物中,J类和N类脱颖而出。在收集到的最著名的药物中,8.3%被归类为“非肾毒性”,“16.7%为潜在肾毒性,“和75%”已知肾毒性。“值得注意的活性成分包括cobicistat+elvitegravir+恩曲他滨+替诺福韦酯(IC0258.7;ROR786.96),伊诺特森(IC0257.7;ROR604.57),恩曲他滨+替诺福韦酯(IC0257.9;ROR432.36),埃索美拉唑(IC0256.8;ROR184.23),和泮托拉唑(IC0256.3;ROR109.86),质子泵抑制剂在最常见的药物中占据前四名。结论AKD是VigiBase常见的不良反应,报告的死亡率很高。对通知的评估显示,药物的不成比例指数较高,并且与AKD密切相关。我们还强调了较少怀疑药物的潜在肾毒性作用。这项研究强调需要考虑AKD作为一种可能与医源性病因相关的疾病。强调各种药物及其各自参与AKD的各种可能表现。
    Background Drugs are a frequent cause of nephrotoxicity, especially in the context of acute kidney disease (AKD), with a significant number of cases being drug-associated. The WHO\'s VigiBase is a powerful tool for identifying drugs described and associated with the development of AKD. Methods We retrieved data from the period 1968 to 2022 regarding notifications of adverse drug reactions (ADR). The extracted medications were evaluated for their nephrotoxicity based on the bibliographic score (BS) developed through pre-selected references. The main medications involved were classified as \'non-nephrotoxic\', \'potentially nephrotoxic\', and \'nephrotoxic\'. We utilized the IC025 and reporting odds ratio (ROR) disproportionality indexes to study the relationship between medications and the odds of being included in an AKD notification. Results During the period, a total of 33,932,051 notifications were obtained, revealing 435,677 cases related to drug-associated AKD following MedDRA term filtering, predominantly affecting males aged 45-64. We identified 8,991 active ingredients or suspected combinations associated with AKD development, with the ATC class A - Alimentary Tract and Metabolism being the most frequently described. Among the medications most strongly associated with this phenotype, classes J and N stood out. Among the most notable medications collected, 8.3% were classified as \"non-nephrotoxic,\" 16.7% as \"potentially nephrotoxic,\" and 75% as \"known nephrotoxic.\" Notable active ingredients included cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil (IC025 8.7; ROR 786.96), inotersen (IC025 7.7; ROR 604.57), emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil (IC025 7.9; ROR 432.36), esomeprazole (IC025 6.8; ROR 184.23), and pantoprazole (IC025 6.3; ROR 109.86), with proton pump inhibitors dominating the top four positions among the most frequently involved medications. Conclusion AKD is a frequent adverse reaction in VigiBase, with a significantly high reported mortality rate. Evaluation of the notifications revealed medications with a high disproportionality index and a strong association with AKD. We also highlight the potential nephrotoxic role of less suspected medications. This study emphasizes the need to consider AKD as a condition potentially associated with iatrogenic etiology, highlighting various medications and their respective involvement in the various possible manifestations of AKD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然精神活性药物(PMed)需要在一些精神病条件,它们的使用和误用承担着风险。我们旨在估计PMed使用和误用的患病率。
    2017年在葡萄牙里斯本和塔霍河谷地区社区药房(ARSLVT)开具的所有PMed数据均从ARSLVT药品配药数据库中提取。对于处方阿片类药物中的21PM,苯二氮卓类药物和Z-药物(BZDR),抗抑郁药(AD)和抗惊厥药(AC),我们估计了每个PMed的用户数量,并通过一组研究该实践的代理指标评估了PMed滥用:长期使用(在研究期间使用≥180DDD)用于短期治疗的PMed,同时使用几个PMed,特别是如果涉及长期(≥30天)阿片类镇痛药(OA)使用,和医生购物(患者咨询几位医生,以便获得比每个处方者预期更高的数量)。数据采用描述性统计和假设检验进行分析,多因素logistic回归分析用于探讨影响慢性OA与其他PMed长期合并治疗的潜在因素.
    OA的PMed使用率为21.7%:6.6%,苯二氮卓类药物(BZD)为12.7%,AD为5.3%,AC为2.8%。BZDR主要用于初级保健和医院门诊患者的OA。在25%中观察到长期使用PMed,特别是舍曲林和丁丙诺啡用于阿片类药物使用障碍(长期治疗),和劳拉西泮(短期治疗)。约56.6%的OA长期使用者是与其他PMed长期并发使用者,主要是BZDR。BZDR的滥用风险很低,虽然四种阿片类药物有有意义的医生购物指标——芬太尼,阿片类药物使用障碍丁丙诺啡,吗啡和氢吗啡酮.
    BZD是ARSLVT中使用的主要PMed,通常是长期的,尤其是劳拉西泮.OA使用率低,尽管误用风险高于BZDR。经常同时使用几个PMed。
    UNASSIGNED: Although psychoactive medicines (PMed) are needed in several psychiatric conditions, their use and misuse bear risks. We aimed at estimating the prevalence of PMed use and misuse.
    UNASSIGNED: Data on all PMed prescribed in 2017 and dispensed in community pharmacies of the Lisbon and Tagus Valley region of Portugal (ARSLVT) were extracted from ARSLVT medicines\' dispensing database. For 21 PMed among prescription opioids, benzodiazepines and z-drugs (BZDR), antidepressants (AD) and anticonvulsants (AC), we estimated the number of users of each PMed, and assessed PMed misuse by a set of proxy indicators for studying this practice: chronic use (use of ≥180 DDD during the study period) of PMed intended for short-term treatments, concomitant use of several PMed, in particular if involving long-term (≥ 30 days) opioid analgesic (OA) use, and doctor shopping (patients consulting several physicians in order to have access to a quantity higher than intended by each prescriber). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing, and multivariate logistic regression was used to explore potential factors affecting long-term concomitant treatment of chronic OA with other PMed.
    UNASSIGNED: PMed use prevalence was 21.7%: 6.6% for OA, 12.7% for benzodiazepines (BZD), 5.3% for AD and 2.8% for AC. BZDR were mainly prescribed in primary care and OA in hospital outpatients. Chronic use of PMed was observed in 25%, especially with sertraline and buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (long-term treatment), and lorazepam (short-term treatment). About 56.6% of OA chronic users were long-term concurrent users with other PMed, mainly BZDR. Risk of abuse was low for BZDR, whilst four opioids had meaningful doctor shopping indicators - fentanyl, opioid use disorder buprenorphine, morphine and hydromorphone.
    UNASSIGNED: BZD are the main PMed used in ARSLVT, often chronically, especially lorazepam. Prevalence of OA use is low, although with higher risk of misuse than BZDR. Concomitant use of several PMed is frequent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:根据将估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)标准化为1.73m2的体表面积(BSA)的方程式调整药物剂量水平可能会带来挑战,特别是对于体重指数(BMI)极高或极低的患者。本研究针对CKD和糖尿病患者的目的是评估基于肌酐的方程对肾功能估计和口服抗糖尿病药物(OADs)不适当处方频率的影响。方法:前瞻性CKD-REIN队列由eGFR<60mL/min/1.73m2的患者组成。这项研究的纳入标准是OAD的使用和体重数据的可用性,身高和血清肌酐。我们比较了三个BMI亚组的数据(第1组<30kg/m2;第2组30-34.9kg/m2;第3组≥35kg/m2)。根据2009年慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)公式评估产品特征和患者肾功能的总结,评估了不适当的处方(禁忌或过量用药)。2021年CKD-EPI方程,肾脏疾病饮食(MDRD)方程的修改,欧洲肾功能联盟(EKFC)方程,他们的去指数估计,和Cockcroft-Gault(CG)公式。通过评估1)索引和去索引的eGFRs之间的差异来评估方程去索引的影响,和2)索引估计值和去索引估计值之间至少有一个不适当的OAD处方的患者比例差异。结果:在基线,694名患者接受OADs。BMI中位数为30.7kg/m2,平均BSA为1.98m2,90%的患者BSA>1.73m2。降低肾功能估计值导致更高的eGFRs,尤其是BMI3组。比较索引估计值和去索引估计值时,至少有一个不适当处方的患者比例差异很大。差异的大小随BMI的增加而增加:将BMI组1与BMI组3进行比较时,去索引的2021CKD-EPI和索引的CKD-EPI之间的差异分别为-4%和-10%。二甲双胍和西格列汀是最常见的不当处方OAD。结论:我们强调了用于估计肾功能的BSA索引和去索引版本之间的显着差异,强调使用去指数化的估计值来调整药物剂量水平的重要性-特别是在具有极端BMI的患者中。
    Introduction: Adjusting drug dose levels based on equations that standardize the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to a body surface area (BSA) of 1.73 m2 can pose challenges, especially for patients with extremely high or low body mass index (BMI). The objective of the present study of patients with CKD and diabetes was to assess the impact of deindexing creatinine-based equations on estimates of kidney function and on the frequency of inappropriate prescriptions of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Methods: The prospective CKD-REIN cohort is comprised of patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The inclusion criteria for this study were the use of OADs and the availability of data on weight, height and serum creatinine. We compared data for three BMI subgroups (group 1 <30 kg/m2; group 2 30-34.9 kg/m2; group 3 ≥35 kg/m2). Inappropriate prescriptions (contraindicated or over-dosed drugs) were assessed with regard to the summary of product characteristics and the patient\'s kidney function estimated with the 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, the 2021 CKD-EPI equation, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation, the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation, their deindexed estimates, and the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula. The impact of deindexing the equations was evaluated by assessing 1) the difference between the indexed and deindexed eGFRs, and 2) the difference in the proportion of patients with at least one inappropriate OAD prescription between the indexed and deindexed estimates. Results: At baseline, 694 patients were receiving OADs. The median BMI was 30.7 kg/m2, the mean BSA was 1.98 m2, and 90% of patients had a BSA >1.73 m2. Deindexing the kidney function estimates led to higher eGFRs, especially in BMI group 3. The proportion of patients with at least one inappropriate prescription differed greatly when comparing indexed and deindexed estimates. The magnitude of the difference increased with the BMI: when comparing BMI group 1 with BMI group 3, the difference was respectively -4% and -10% between deindexed 2021 CKD-EPI and indexed CKD-EPI. Metformin and sitagliptin were the most frequent inappropriately prescribed OADs. Conclusion: We highlight significant differences between the BSA-indexed and deindexed versions of equations used to estimate kidney function, emphasizing the importance of using deindexed estimates to adjust drug dose levels - especially in patients with an extreme BMI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    现代重症监护提高了生存率,但是新出现的证据表明,重症监护病房(ICU)后健康问题的患病率很高,包括创伤后应激障碍,抑郁和焦虑。这些症状可能对生活质量产生不利影响并增加死亡率。这项研究的主要目的是检查ICU幸存者开始抗抑郁药物治疗的程度,并确定与其使用相关的因素。次要目标是调查这些药物的使用是否与死亡率增加有关。全国范围的研究队列包括2010年至2017年间收治的125,130名ICU幸存者。在ICU出院后的前3个月内,7%的患者开始服用抗抑郁药物,到1年,15.5%的人开始用药。在2年的随访期间,我们没有发现下降的趋势。与抗抑郁药使用相关的因素包括中年,女性性别,精神病和躯体合并症,物质依赖,疾病严重程度更高,ICU逗留时间更长。抗抑郁药使用者的死亡率更高,在该组中,由于外部原因导致的死亡和自杀更为频繁。这项研究强调了在ICU幸存者中检测和解决抑郁症的重要性,以改善他们的生活质量并降低死亡率。
    Modern intensive care has improved survival rates, but emerging evidence suggests a high prevalence of post-intensive care unit (ICU) health problems, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety. These symptoms may have a detrimental effect on quality of life and increase mortality. The primary objective of this study is to examine the extent of initiation of antidepressant medication among ICU survivors and identify the factors associated with its usage. The secondary objective is to investigate whether the use of these medications is linked to an increased mortality. The nationwide study cohort included 125,130 ICU survivors admitted between 2010 and 2017. Within the first 3 months after ICU discharge, 7% of patients initiated antidepressant medication, by 1 year 15.5% had started medication. We found no tendency to a decrease during the 2-year follow-up period. Factors associated with antidepressant use included middle age, female sex, psychiatric and somatic comorbid conditions, substance dependence, higher illness severity, and longer ICU stay. Antidepressant users had a higher mortality rate, and deaths due to external causes and suicide were more frequent in this group. This study emphasizes the importance of detecting and addressing depression in ICU survivors to improve their quality of life and reduce mortality rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行对心理健康产生了重大影响,有证据表明存在持久的心理健康危机。全世界的研究观察到抗抑郁药的使用增加,抗焦虑药,大流行期间的催眠药,尤其是年轻人和妇女。然而,很少有研究跟踪2021年后的消费。我们的研究旨在通过调查法国精神药物消费者数量的激增是否在第一次封锁后持续了两年来填补这一空白,特别关注年龄和性别差异。
    方法:我们基于法国国家保险数据库进行了一项全国性回顾性观察研究。我们找到了所有抗焦虑药的处方,催眠药,以及2015-2022年期间在法国药店分配的抗抑郁药。我们基于Poisson模型对五个年龄组(12-18;19-25;26-50;51-75;76及以上)进行了中断时间序列分析,以评估封锁前的趋势。引起的差距和之后趋势的变化。
    结果:在总体人口中,抗抑郁药的消费者数量保持不变,而抗焦虑药和催眠药的消费者数量却有所减少。尽管有这种全球趋势,在12-18和19-25这三种药物组中观察到长期增加。此外,对于这些年龄段,女性的增长比男性更明显,除了催眠趋势相似。
    结论:使用抗抑郁药的人数在第一次封锁后两年多继续增加,对心理健康有长期影响。这种影响在青少年和年轻人中尤其明显,这证实了大流行对他们心理健康的长期破坏性影响。
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on mental health, with evidence suggesting an enduring mental health crisis. Studies worldwide observed increased usage of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotics during the pandemic, notably among young people and women. However, few studies tracked consumption post-2021. Our study aimed to fill this gap by investigating whether the surge in the number psychotropic drug consumers in France persisted 2 years after the first lockdown, particularly focusing on age and gender differences.
    METHODS: We conducted a national retrospective observational study based on the French national insurance database. We retrieved all prescriptions of anxiolytics, hypnotics, and antidepressants dispensed in pharmacies in France for the period 2015-2022. We performed interrupted time series analyses based on Poisson models for five age classes (12-18; 19-25; 26-50; 51-75; 76 and more) to assess the trend before lockdown, the gap induced and the change in trend after.
    RESULTS: In the overall population, the number of consumers remained constant for antidepressants while it decreased for anxiolytics and hypnotics. Despite this global trend, a long-term increase was observed in the 12-18 and 19-25 groups for the three drug classes. Moreover, for these age classes, the increases were more pronounced for women than men, except for hypnotics where the trends were similar.
    CONCLUSIONS: The number of people using antidepressants continues to increase more than 2 years after the first lockdown, showing a prolonged effect on mental health. This effect is particularly striking among adolescents and young adults confirming the devastating long-term impact of the pandemic on their mental health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    痤疮是一种涉及毛囊皮脂腺的慢性炎性疾病。其药物治疗包括局部和全身药物,但一组异类药物可能会加剧或诱发皮肤损伤。这项研究的目的是确定与诊断为痤疮的患者皮肤病变恶化相关的药物管理和药物。
    这是一项横断面研究,从哥伦比亚卫生系统850万成员的配药数据库中确定了痤疮患者的门诊用药处方模式。考虑了社会人口统计学和药理学变量以及由于痤疮恶化的风险而可能不适当的处方的识别。
    共确定了21,604名痤疮患者。中位年龄为20.8岁(四分位数范围:17.3-27.3岁),60.7%为女性。治疗主要包括抗生素(79.9%的患者),尤其是多西环素(66.0%),和类维生素A(55.7%)。总共有17.2%的患者有潜在的不适当的处方,主要是具有雄激素特性的孕激素(8.9%)。女性患者(比值比[OR]:3.55;95%置信区间[CI]:3.24-3.90)和患有系统性红斑狼疮(OR:18.61;95%CI:7.23-47.93)和类风湿性关节炎(OR:10.80;95%CI:5.02-23.23)的患者更有可能接受不适当的处方,且风险随寿命的增加而增加(OR:1.02;95%CI:1.02-1.03)。
    无法获得医疗记录以验证痤疮的临床特征。
    痤疮患者使用全身抗生素过度治疗,与临床实践指南背道而驰。这些患者中约有五分之一接受了一些可能加剧其皮肤损伤的潜在不适当药物治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Acne is a chronic inflammatory disease that involves the pilosebaceous follicle. Its pharmacological treatment involves topical and systemic medications, but a heterogeneous group of drugs may exacerbate or induce skin lesions. The aim of this study was to identify the pharmacological management and medications related to the exacerbation of skin lesions in patients diagnosed with acne.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a cross-sectional study that identified the outpatient medication prescription patterns of patients with acne from a dispensing database of 8.5 million members of the Colombian Health System. Sociodemographic and pharmacological variables and the identification of prescriptions that were potentially inappropriate due to the risk of worsening acne were considered.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 21,604 patients with acne were identified. Median age was 20.8 years (interquartile range: 17.3-27.3 years), and 60.7 percent were female. Treatment mainly involved antibiotics (79.9% of patients), especially doxycycline (66.0%), and retinoids (55.7%). A total of 17.2 percent of patients had potentially inappropriate prescriptions, predominantly progestogens with androgenic properties (8.9%). Female patients (odds ratio [OR]: 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]:3.24-3.90) and patients with pathologies such as systemic lupus erythematosus (OR: 18.61; 95% CI: 7.23-47.93) and rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 10.80; 95% CI: 5.02-23.23) were more likely to receive inappropriate prescriptions, and the risk increased with each year of life (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.02-1.03).
    UNASSIGNED: Access to medical records was not obtained to verify clinical characteristics of acne.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with acne are excessively treated with systemic antibiotics, counter to clinical practice guidelines. Approximately one-fifth of these patients received some potentially inappropriate medication that could exacerbate their skin lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:一项药物流行病学研究,以评估糖尿病人群中的VTE危险因素。
    方法:该研究包括299,590名个体。我们观察了3450例VTE,并使用嵌套病例对照方法将其与15,875例对照进行了匹配,并收集了合并症和处方数据。通过多变量条件逻辑回归,我们用95CI计算合并症和药物的OR,以评估其与VTE的关联.
    结果:糖尿病(aOR2.16;95CI1.99-2.34),炎症性肠病(1.84;1.27-2.66),和严重精神疾病(1.72;1.43-2.05)在非癌症合并症中的关联最强.胰腺(12.32;7.11-21.36),胃(8.57;4.07-18.03),肺和支气管(6.26;4.16-9.43),和卵巢癌(6.72;2.95-15.10)被列为VTE的高风险。皮质类固醇,gabapentinoids,精神药物,利塞膦酸,普拉克索与VTE的相关性最强(aOR超过1.5)。胰岛素(3.86;3.33-4.47)和磺脲类药物(2.62;2.18-3.16)的相关性强于二甲双胍(1.65;1.49-1.83)。他汀类药物和乐卡地平(0.78;0.62-0.98)与VTE风险降低相关。
    结论:在这个队列中,糖尿病患病率为50%,胰腺,胃,肺和支气管,卵巢癌与VTE密切相关。皮质类固醇,gabapentinoids,精神药物与VTE的相关性最强。这对于生成用于进一步研究的假设可能是有价值的。乐卡地平可能是一种新型的抗VTE保护药物。
    OBJECTIVE: A pharmacoepidemiological study to assess VTE risk factors in a diabetes-rich population.
    METHODS: The study comprised 299,590 individuals. We observed 3450 VTEs and matched them with 15,875 controls using a nested case-control approach and collected data on comorbidities and prescriptions. By multivariable conditional logistic regression, we calculated ORs with 95%CIs for comorbidities and medications to evaluate their associations with VTE.
    RESULTS: Diabetes (aOR 2.16; 95%CI 1.99-2.34), inflammatory bowel disease (1.84; 1.27-2.66), and severe psychiatric disorders (1.72; 1.43-2.05) had the strongest associations among the non-cancer comorbidities. Pancreatic (12.32; 7.11-21.36), stomach (8.57; 4.07-18.03), lung and bronchus (6.26; 4.16-9.43), and ovarian (6.72; 2.95-15.10) cancers were ranked as high-risk for VTE. Corticosteroids, gabapentinoids, psychotropic drugs, risedronic acid, and pramipexole were most strongly associated (aOR exceeding 1.5) with VTE. Insulin (3.86; 3.33-4.47) and sulphonylureas (2.62; 2.18-3.16) had stronger associations than metformin (1.65; 1.49-1.83). Statins and lercanidipine (0.78; 0.62-0.98) were associated with a lowered risk of VTE.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, with 50% diabetes prevalence, pancreatic, stomach, lung and bronchus, and ovarian cancers were strongly associated with VTE. Corticosteroids, gabapentinoids, and psychotropic medications had the strongest associations with VTE among medications. This may be valuable for generating hypotheses for the further research. Lercanidipine may be a novel protective medication against VTE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在罕见的神经肌肉和神经退行性疾病中使用的药物的疗效和安全性的比较研究(CAESAR称为AIFA_FV_2012-13-14),我们评估了用于重症肌无力(MG)的药物的使用模式.方法:基于行政医疗数据进行回顾性队列研究。对于一组MG患者,评估病例鉴定后第一年内吡啶斯的明(Py)和其他指定药物的流行和偶然使用.普遍联合使用主要疗法(硫唑嘌呤(Az),泼尼松(Pr),维生素D(Vd))按Py使用分层进行评估,并对MG鉴定时和随访第一年的治疗方法进行了比较.结果:我们纳入了2013年至2019年的2369例MG患者。其中,流行和事件Py用户分别为38.4%和22.0%,分别。在随访的第一年,在74.5%的Py流行用户和82.0%的Py事件用户中观察到Pr的使用,分别观察到Az的使用量为24.9%和23.0%,分别观察到Vd的使用率为53.3%和48.2%,分别。在910个Py流行用户中,13.1%还使用了Az,Pr,和Vd,而15.3%的人没有使用这些。在938名非Py用户中,2.7%使用Az,Pr,和Vd,而53.8%的人没有使用这些。在第一年,在事件Py使用者中,联合疗法的增加是明显的.结论:我们的结果表明,对于一些MG患者来说,可能需要将快速起效的获益与长期和一致的疾病控制相结合的治疗方法.这些问题可以通过目前正在开发的新疗法来解决。迄今为止,需要更多的研究来解决异质性,质量,和现有数据的泛化性,并评估使用模式,功效,以及MG新疗法或新兴疗法的安全性。
    Background: In the context of a comparative study of efficacy and safety of drugs used in rare neuromuscular and neurodegenerative diseases (CAESAR-call AIFA_FV_2012-13-14), we assessed the use patterns of drugs indicated for myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on administrative healthcare data. For a cohort of MG patients, prevalent and incident use of pyridostigmine (Py) and other indicated drugs in the first year after case identification was evaluated. Prevalent combined use of major therapies (azathioprine (Az), prednisone (Pr), vitamin D (Vd)) stratified by Py use was assessed, and a comparison between therapies at the time of MG identification and during the first year of follow-up was performed. Results: We included 2369 MG patients between 2013 and 2019. Among them, prevalent and incident Py users were 38.4% and 22.0%, respectively. In the first year of follow-up, the use of Pr was observed in 74.5% of Py prevalent users and in 82.0% of Py incident users, respectively; the use of Az was observed in 24.9% and 23.0%, respectively; and the use of Vd was observed in 53.3% and 48.2%, respectively. Among 910 Py prevalent users, 13.1% also used Az, Pr, and Vd, while 15.3% used none of these. Among 938 non-Py users, 2.7% used Az, Pr, and Vd, while 53.8% used none of these. During the first year, an increase in combined therapies was evident in incident Py users. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, for some MG patients, there may be a need for treatments that combine a rapid onset of benefit with long-term and consistent disease control. These issues may be addressed by the new treatments currently being developed. To date, more studies are needed to address the heterogeneity, quality, and generalizability of the existing data and to evaluate patterns of use, efficacy, and safety of new or emerging therapies for MG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号