pharmacoepidemiology

药物流行病学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是描述和讨论整个挪威人群中偏头痛药物使用的模式。
    方法:在全国范围内,观察性研究,我们使用挪威处方数据库确定了2010年至2020年间所有接受偏头痛相关处方的患者.感兴趣的结果是偏头痛药物使用者的发病率和1年患病率,以及过度使用Triptan的个人。根据年龄调整,对女性和男性之间的药物使用模式进行了统计比较,治疗开始的年份,合并症和居住地县计算调整比值比(aOR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
    结果:我们确定了327,904名偏头痛药物使用者。发病率从0.39%到0.46%,1年患病率从1.99%上升到2.99%。在研究期间预防性使用增加>50%。女性处方预防药物的频率明显高于男性(39.72%vs.33.75%;aOR1.41,95%CI1.38至1.44)。Triptan的过度使用在女性中更为常见,但是过度使用的女性更经常使用预防措施,与男性相比(56.64%vs52.69%;aOR=1.43,95%CI1.37至1.49)。
    结论:药物治疗偏头痛的患病率较低。经常过度使用Triptans,尤其是女性。应该鼓励临床医生尝试不同的曲坦,认识到曲坦过度使用,并在指示时开出预防措施。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe and discuss patterns of migraine medication use in the entire Norwegian population.
    METHODS: In this nationwide, observational study, all individuals with a migraine-related prescription between 2010 and 2020 were identified using the Norwegian Prescription Database. The outcomes of interest were the incidence and 1-year prevalence of migraine medication users, as well as individuals with triptan overuse. Patterns of medication use were statistically compared between women and men adjusted for age, year of treatment start, comorbidities and county of residence calculating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
    RESULTS: We identified 327,904 migraine medication users. The incidence ranged from 0.39% to 0.46%, and the 1-year prevalence increased from 1.99% to 2.99%. Preventive use increased >50% during the study period. Preventives were significantly more often prescribed to women than to men (39.72% vs. 33.75%; aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.44). Triptan overuse was significantly more common among women, but women with overuse were more often using preventives, as compared to men (56.64% vs 52.69%; aOR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.49).
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of medically treated migraine is low. Overuse of triptans is frequent, especially among women. Clinicians should be encouraged to try out different triptans, recognize triptan overuse, and prescribe preventives when indicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:用于数据的元数据欧洲药品管理局资助的项目(EUPAS39322),定义了一组元数据来描述现实世界的数据源(RWDS),并在原型目录中试行了元数据收集,以帮助调查人员通过研究进行数据源的可发现性。
    方法:元数据列表是根据对现有元数据目录和建议的审查而创建的,结构化面试,利益相关者调查,和技术研讨会。原型的设计符合FAIR原则(可找到,可访问,可互操作,可重用),使用MOLGENIS软件。元数据收集由来自欧洲各地的15个数据访问合作伙伴(DAP)进行试点。
    结果:总共在六个领域中定义了442个元数据变量:机构(连接到数据源的组织);数据库(由组织维持的数据收集);数据源(涵盖共同基础人群的可链接数据库的集合);研究;(机构)网络;和通用数据模型(CDM)。原型中总共记录了26个机构。每个DAP填充一个数据源及其所选数据库的元数据。数据库的数量因数据源而异;最常见的数据库是医院管理记录和药房分配记录(每个10个数据源)。从符合不同CDM的三个数据源中成功提取了定量元数据,并将其输入到原型中。
    结论:最终确定了元数据列表,一个原型被成功填充,并制定了良好的实践指南。建立和维护RWDS的元数据目录将需要大量努力来支持数据源的可发现性和欧洲研究的可重复性。
    OBJECTIVE: Metadata for data dIscoverability aNd study rEplicability in obseRVAtional studies (MINERVA), a European Medicines Agency-funded project (EUPAS39322), defined a set of metadata to describe real-world data sources (RWDSs) and piloted metadata collection in a prototype catalogue to assist investigators from data source discoverability through study conduct.
    METHODS: A list of metadata was created from a review of existing metadata catalogues and recommendations, structured interviews, a stakeholder survey, and a technical workshop. The prototype was designed to comply with the FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable), using MOLGENIS software. Metadata collection was piloted by 15 data access partners (DAPs) from across Europe.
    RESULTS: A total of 442 metadata variables were defined in six domains: institutions (organizations connected to a data source); data banks (data collections sustained by an organization); data sources (collections of linkable data banks covering a common underlying population); studies; networks (of institutions); and common data models (CDMs). A total of 26 institutions were recorded in the prototype. Each DAP populated the metadata of one data source and its selected data banks. The number of data banks varied by data source; the most common data banks were hospital administrative records and pharmacy dispensation records (10 data sources each). Quantitative metadata were successfully extracted from three data sources conforming to different CDMs and entered into the prototype.
    CONCLUSIONS: A metadata list was finalized, a prototype was successfully populated, and a good practice guide was developed. Setting up and maintaining a metadata catalogue on RWDSs will require substantial effort to support discoverability of data sources and reproducibility of studies in Europe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:高血压(HT),血脂异常(DL),糖尿病(DM)是心血管疾病的主要危险因素。尽管有广泛的药物来降低这种风险,药物依从性差仍然是一个问题。这项研究的目的是评估这些疾病药物的普遍使用者的药物依从性(HT,DL,DM)使用索赔数据。还检查了与非依从性相关的因素。
    方法:对Tsuruoka代谢组学队列研究的7538名参与者,3693(HT:2702,DL:2112,DM:661)被确定为这些疾病药物的普遍使用者。通过问卷收集有关生活方式的信息。坚持通过覆盖天数(PDC)的比例来评估,PDC≥0.8的参与者被定义为坚持。通过进行多变量逻辑回归确定非依从性的预测因子。
    结果:药物依从性因治疗状态而异。在那些没有合并症的人中,仅使用HT的患者的依从性最高(90.2%),其次是仅DM(81.2%)和仅DL(80.8%)。与每个药物组的不依从性相关的因素是不吃早餐和使用HT药物的人对药物的理解不足。女性,有合并症,有心脏病史,以及那些服用DL药物的人的饮酒习惯,和良好的睡眠质量和不吃早餐的那些DM药物。
    结论:虽然参与者表现出较高的药物依从性,观察到不同药物组的差异。确定的非依从性预测因素可以帮助瞄准那些需要依从性支持的人。
    OBJECTIVE: Hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia (DL), and diabetes mellitus (DM) are major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Despite the wide availability of medications to reduce this risk, poor adherence to medications remains an issue. The aim of this study is to evaluate medication adherence of prevalent users in these disease medications (HT, DL, DM) using claims data. Factors associated with non-adherence were also examined.
    METHODS: Of 7538 participants of the Tsuruoka Metabolomics Cohort Study, 3693 (HT: 2702, DL: 2112, DM: 661) were identified as prevalent users of these disease medications. Information on lifestyle was collected through a questionnaire. Adherence was assessed by a proportion of days covered (PDC) and participants with PDC ≥0.8 were defined as adherent. Predictors of non-adherence were determined by performing multivariable logistic regression.
    RESULTS: Medication adherence differed by treatment status. Among those without comorbidities, those with HT-only showed the highest adherence (90.2%), followed by those with DM-only (81.2%) and those with DL-only (80.8%). Factors associated with non-adherence in each medication group were skipping breakfast and poor understanding of medications among those with HT medications, females, having comorbidities, having a history of heart disease, and drinking habit among those with DL medications, and good sleep quality and skipping breakfast among those with DM medications.
    CONCLUSIONS: While participants showed high medication adherence, differences were observed across medication groups. The identified predictors of non-adherence could help target those in need of adherence support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:美国食品和药物管理局最近的一份报告强调了对西格列汀中亚硝胺(7-亚硝基-3-(三氟甲基)-5,6,7,8-四氢[1,2,4]三唑并[4,3-a]吡嗪[NTTP])杂质的关注,促使对其安全性进行调查。本研究旨在确定使用NTTP污染的西格列汀,与其他二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂相比,与癌症风险增加有关。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究再次使用了日本的国家健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库,涵盖超过1.2亿个人的数据。该研究涉及开始DPP-4抑制剂治疗(西格列汀或其他DPP-4抑制剂)并继续独家使用3年的患者。将西格列汀使用者与其他DPP-4抑制剂使用者进行比较,以评估癌症的发生。由诊断代码定义。进一步的分析集中在特定类型的癌症,使用诊断代码或诊断和程序代码的组合。我们还进行了各种敏感性分析,包括那些具有不同暴露期的。
    结果:西格列汀使用者(149,120例患者,388356人年)经历了9,643例癌症发病率(2,483.0/100,000人年)与其他DPP-4抑制剂使用者中的12,621例发病率(2,504.4/100,000人年)(199,860例患者,503,952人年),产生最小差异(发生率比0.99,95%置信区间0.97-1.02)。多重Cox比例风险模型显示西格列汀使用与总体癌症发病率之间没有显著关联(风险比1.01,95%置信区间0.98-1.04)。研究结果在癌症类型和敏感性分析中也是一致的。
    结论:我们没有观察到证据表明服用NTTP污染的西格列汀的患者癌症风险增加,尽管需要继续调查。
    OBJECTIVE: A recent US Food and Drug Administration report highlighted concerns over nitrosamine (7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro[1,2,4] triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine [NTTP]) impurities in sitagliptin, prompting investigations into its safety profile. The present study aimed to determine if the use of NTTP-contaminated sitagliptin, in comparison with other dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, is associated with an increased cancer risk.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study secondarily used the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan, encompassing data on >120 million individuals. The study involved patients who initiated DPP-4 inhibitor therapy (sitagliptin or other DPP-4 inhibitors) and continued its exclusive use for 3 years. Sitagliptin users were compared with other DPP-4 inhibitor users for assessing the occurrence of cancers, as defined by diagnosis codes. Further analyses focused on specific types of cancer, using either diagnosis codes or a combination of diagnosis and procedure codes. We also carried out various sensitivity analyses, including those with different exposure periods.
    RESULTS: Sitagliptin users (149,120 patients, 388,356 person-years) experienced 9,643 cancer incidences (2,483.0/100,000 person-years) versus 12,621 incidences (2,504.4/100,000 person-years) among other DPP-4 inhibitor users (199,860 patients, 503,952 person-years), yielding a minimal difference (incidence rate ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.02). A multiple Cox proportional hazards model showed no significant association between sitagliptin use and overall cancer incidence (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.04). Findings were also consistent across cancer types and sensitivity analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: We observed no evidence to suggest an increased cancer risk among patients prescribed NTTP-contaminated sitagliptin, although continued investigation is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较莫诺比拉韦和尼马特雷韦利托那韦治疗非住院和住院COVID-19合并2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的疗效。
    方法:采用序贯试验方法,利用全港电子健康记录进行目标试验仿真。患者(1)年龄≥18岁,(2)与T2DM,(3)COVID-19感染,和(4)在2022年3月16日至2022年12月31日期间,在非医院和医院环境中,在感染后5天内接受莫诺比拉韦或尼马特雷韦-利托那韦的患者被纳入.Molnupiravir和nirmatrelvir-ritonavir发起者使用一对一倾向评分匹配进行匹配,并随访28天。通过校正基线特征的Cox回归比较组间的结果风险。对年龄进行亚组分析(<70岁,≥70岁),性别,Charlson合并症指数(<4,≥4),和COVID-19疫苗剂量的数量(<2剂,≥2剂量)。
    结果:共17974例非住院患者(每组8987例)和3678例住院患者(每组1839例)。非住院nirmatrelvir-ritonavir发起者的全因死亡率风险较低(28天时绝对风险降低[ARR]0.80%,95%置信区间[CI]0.56-1.04;风险比[HR]0.47,95%CI0.30-0.73)和住院(28天ARR4.01%,95%可信区间3.19-4.83;HR0.73,95%可信区间0.66-0.82)与Molnupiravir发起人相比。住院尼马特雷韦-利托那韦的发起人降低了全因死亡率的风险(28天时ARR为2.94%,95%CI1.65-4.23;HR0.56,95%CI0.40-0.80),与莫努普拉韦发起人相比。在所有亚组中发现一致的发现。
    结论:对于任何一种治疗都没有禁忌症的COVID-19T2DM患者,使用尼马特雷韦-利托那韦可能优于莫诺比拉韦。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
    METHODS: Territory-wide electronic health records in Hong Kong were used to perform target trial emulation using a sequential trial approach. Patients (1) aged ≥18 years, (2) with T2DM, (3) with COVID-19 infection, and (4) who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within 5 days of infection between 16 March 2022 and 31 December 2022 in non-hospital and hospital settings were included. Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators were matched using one-to-one propensity-score matching and followed for 28 days. Risk of outcomes was compared between groups by Cox regression adjusted for baseline characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed on age (<70 years, ≥70 years), sex, Charlson comorbidity index (<4, ≥4), and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses (<2 doses, ≥2 doses).
    RESULTS: Totals of 17 974 non-hospitalized (8987 in each group) and 3678 hospitalized (1839 in each group) patients were identified. Non-hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had lower risk of all-cause mortality (absolute risk reduction [ARR] at 28 days 0.80%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-1.04; hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.73) and hospitalization (ARR at 28 days 4.01%, 95% CI 3.19-4.83; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66-0.82) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had reduced risk of all-cause mortality (ARR at 28 days 2.94%, 95% CI 1.65-4.23; HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.80) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Consistent findings were found across all subgroups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir may be preferred to molnupiravir for COVID-19 patients with T2DM and without contraindication to either treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然精神活性药物(PMed)需要在一些精神病条件,它们的使用和误用承担着风险。我们旨在估计PMed使用和误用的患病率。
    2017年在葡萄牙里斯本和塔霍河谷地区社区药房(ARSLVT)开具的所有PMed数据均从ARSLVT药品配药数据库中提取。对于处方阿片类药物中的21PM,苯二氮卓类药物和Z-药物(BZDR),抗抑郁药(AD)和抗惊厥药(AC),我们估计了每个PMed的用户数量,并通过一组研究该实践的代理指标评估了PMed滥用:长期使用(在研究期间使用≥180DDD)用于短期治疗的PMed,同时使用几个PMed,特别是如果涉及长期(≥30天)阿片类镇痛药(OA)使用,和医生购物(患者咨询几位医生,以便获得比每个处方者预期更高的数量)。数据采用描述性统计和假设检验进行分析,多因素logistic回归分析用于探讨影响慢性OA与其他PMed长期合并治疗的潜在因素.
    OA的PMed使用率为21.7%:6.6%,苯二氮卓类药物(BZD)为12.7%,AD为5.3%,AC为2.8%。BZDR主要用于初级保健和医院门诊患者的OA。在25%中观察到长期使用PMed,特别是舍曲林和丁丙诺啡用于阿片类药物使用障碍(长期治疗),和劳拉西泮(短期治疗)。约56.6%的OA长期使用者是与其他PMed长期并发使用者,主要是BZDR。BZDR的滥用风险很低,虽然四种阿片类药物有有意义的医生购物指标——芬太尼,阿片类药物使用障碍丁丙诺啡,吗啡和氢吗啡酮.
    BZD是ARSLVT中使用的主要PMed,通常是长期的,尤其是劳拉西泮.OA使用率低,尽管误用风险高于BZDR。经常同时使用几个PMed。
    UNASSIGNED: Although psychoactive medicines (PMed) are needed in several psychiatric conditions, their use and misuse bear risks. We aimed at estimating the prevalence of PMed use and misuse.
    UNASSIGNED: Data on all PMed prescribed in 2017 and dispensed in community pharmacies of the Lisbon and Tagus Valley region of Portugal (ARSLVT) were extracted from ARSLVT medicines\' dispensing database. For 21 PMed among prescription opioids, benzodiazepines and z-drugs (BZDR), antidepressants (AD) and anticonvulsants (AC), we estimated the number of users of each PMed, and assessed PMed misuse by a set of proxy indicators for studying this practice: chronic use (use of ≥180 DDD during the study period) of PMed intended for short-term treatments, concomitant use of several PMed, in particular if involving long-term (≥ 30 days) opioid analgesic (OA) use, and doctor shopping (patients consulting several physicians in order to have access to a quantity higher than intended by each prescriber). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing, and multivariate logistic regression was used to explore potential factors affecting long-term concomitant treatment of chronic OA with other PMed.
    UNASSIGNED: PMed use prevalence was 21.7%: 6.6% for OA, 12.7% for benzodiazepines (BZD), 5.3% for AD and 2.8% for AC. BZDR were mainly prescribed in primary care and OA in hospital outpatients. Chronic use of PMed was observed in 25%, especially with sertraline and buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (long-term treatment), and lorazepam (short-term treatment). About 56.6% of OA chronic users were long-term concurrent users with other PMed, mainly BZDR. Risk of abuse was low for BZDR, whilst four opioids had meaningful doctor shopping indicators - fentanyl, opioid use disorder buprenorphine, morphine and hydromorphone.
    UNASSIGNED: BZD are the main PMed used in ARSLVT, often chronically, especially lorazepam. Prevalence of OA use is low, although with higher risk of misuse than BZDR. Concomitant use of several PMed is frequent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对甲状腺癌幸存者患慢性病的风险知之甚少。因此,我们使用全人群登记数据调查了甲状腺癌患者中用于慢性病的药物的患病率。
    方法:我们将挪威癌症登记处的数据与挪威处方数据库和其他数据库联系起来,研究人群为352万人。包括在2005-2019年期间诊断出的3,486名甲状腺癌患者。甲状腺癌患者在甲状腺癌诊断后15年内报销的处方药的患病率比(PR)和95%置信区间(95CI)。通过对数二项回归进行估计,以无癌症人群为参考。
    结果:患有甲状腺癌的个体(男性和女性)在诊断后的几年中,对几种慢性疾病的药物使用率更高。例如,甲状腺癌诊断五年后,甲状旁腺功能减退症的药物使用增加(男性人数=35.4,95CI25.2-49.7;女性人数=42.8,95CI34.2-53.6),高血压(PRfements=1.20,95CI1.12-1.28),焦虑和紧张(PRmales=4.0195CI1.80-8.92);PRfemens=2.01,95CI1.15-3.52),与无癌人群相比,胃酸紊乱(男性PRmales=1.52,95CI1.22-1.91;女性PRmales=1.45,95CI1.27-1.66)和疼痛(男性PRmales=1.48,95CI1.11-1.97;女性PRmales=1.24,95CI1.08-1.42).此外,患有甲状腺癌的男性长期使用药物治疗抑郁症(例如,年10+,PRmales=1.66,95CI1.06-2.59)。在甲状腺癌诊断之前,甲状腺癌患者在几种情况下也有较高的药物使用率。例如,高血压,胃酸紊乱和疼痛。
    结论:被诊断患有甲状腺癌的个体在一些慢性疾病中长期使用药物升高,与无癌症人群相比。
    OBJECTIVE: Little is known about thyroid cancer survivors\' risk of chronic conditions. We, therefore, investigated the prevalence of drugs used for chronic conditions among thyroid cancer patients using population-wide register data.
    METHODS: We linked data from the Cancer Registry of Norway to the Norwegian Prescription Database and other databases for a study population of 3.52 million individuals, including 3486 individuals with thyroid cancer diagnosed during 2005-2019. Prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% CIs of reimbursed prescribed drugs in thyroid cancer patients up to 15 years after thyroid cancer diagnosis were estimated by log-binomial regression, with the cancer-free population as reference.
    RESULTS: Individuals (both males and females) with thyroid cancer had higher use of drugs for several chronic conditions in the years after diagnosis; eg, 5 years after thyroid cancer diagnosis, there was elevated use of drugs for hypoparathyroidism (PRmales = 35.4, 95% CI, 25.2-49.7; PRfemales = 42.8, 95% CI, 34.2-53.6), hypertension (PRfemales = 1.20, 95% CI, 1.12-1.28), anxiety and tension (PRmales = 4.01, 95% CI, 1.80-8.92; PRfemales = 2.01, 95% CI, 1.15-3.52), gastric acid disorders (PRmales = 1.52, 95% CI, 1.22-1.91; PRfemales = 1.45, 95% CI, 1.27-1.66), and pain (PRmales = 1.48, 95% CI, 1.11-1.97; PRfemales = 1.24, 95% CI, 1.08-1.42) as compared with the cancer-free population. In addition, males with thyroid cancer had long-term elevated use of drugs for depression (eg, year 10+, PRmales = 1.66, 95% CI, 1.06-2.59). Individuals with thyroid cancer also had higher use of drugs for several conditions prior to the thyroid cancer diagnosis, eg, hypertension, gastric acid disorders, and pain.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individuals diagnosed with thyroid cancer had elevated long-term use of drugs for several chronic conditions, as compared with the cancer-free population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:欧洲临床指南推荐动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者,包括缺血性心脏病(IHD),中风和外周动脉疾病(PAD),是处方降脂治疗(LLT)和治疗目标低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平。这项研究旨在记录ASCVD的趋势,包括治疗,监测,并达到目标LDL-C。
    方法:使用关联医疗保健数据的回顾性观察人群研究(2010-22)。
    结果:在研究期间,ASCVD患者人数从181,153人增加到207,747人(每100,000人中有8882人增加到9398人)。使用LLT的患者比例从2010年的75.3%下降到2022年的67.1%;高强度他汀类药物治疗从9.4%上升到25.2%,非高强度他汀类药物治疗从59.6%下降到38.2%。高强度他汀类药物治疗的处方始终高于IHD患者(2010年为10.9%,2022年为28.0%),高于卒中患者(4.7%至21.6%)或PAD患者(3.9%至10.6%)。记录LDL-C的病例比例从2010年的58.0%下降到2022年的49.3%。2022年有记录的LDL-C患者中,44.0%的LDL-C<1.8mmol/L,包括45.2%的IHD患者,42.0%的中风患者和仅32.8%的PAD患者。
    结论:LLT的处方,包括HI-他汀类药物治疗,LDL-C的记录和目标LDL-C水平的实现相对较低,尤其是PAD患者。尽管“测试患者”的目标成就随着时间的推移而增加,接受血脂检测的患者比例下降.更严格的脂质管理需要优先考虑,尤其是PAD和中风患者。
    我们分析了2010年至2022年间人群中动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病和脂质管理的趋势。患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的患者数量增加了14%,但接受降脂治疗的比例下降了。缺血性心脏病患者比中风患者得到更有效的治疗,外周动脉疾病患者得到的治疗效果最差。
    OBJECTIVE: European clinical guidelines recommend that patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including ischaemic heart disease (IHD), stroke and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), are prescribed lipid lowering treatment (LLT) and treated to target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. This study aimed to document trends in ASCVD including treatment, monitoring, and achievement of target LDL-C.
    METHODS: A retrospective observational population study using linked health-care data (2010-22).
    RESULTS: Over the study period the number of patients with ASCVD increased from 181,153 to 207,747 (8882 to 9398 per 100,000). The proportion of patients prescribed LLT decreased from 75.3% in 2010 to 67.1% in 2022; high-intensity statin therapy increased from 9.4% to 25.2% and non-high-intensity statin therapy decreased from 59.6% to 38.2%. The prescribing of high-intensity statin therapy was consistently higher amongst patients with IHD (10.9% in 2010 increasing to 28.0% in 2022) than in patients with stroke (4.7% to 21.6%) or PAD (3.9% to 10.6%).The proportion of cases with documented LDL-C decreased from 58.0% in 2010 to 49.3% in 2022. Of those with documented LDL-C in 2022, 44.0% achieved LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L, including 45.2% of those with IHD, 42.0% of those with stroke and only 32.8% of those with PAD.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing of LLT, including HI-statin therapy, documentation of LDL-C and achievement of target LDL-C levels was relatively low, especially in PAD patients. Although target achievement in \"tested patients\" increased over time, the proportion of patients undergoing lipid testing declined. More rigorous lipid management requires prioritisation, especially for PAD and stroke patients.
    We analysed trends in the presentation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and lipid management in a population between 2010 to 2022 The number of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease increased by 14% but the proportion receiving lipid lowering therapy decreased.Patients with ischaemic heart disease were more effectively managed than patients with stroke and patients with peripheral arterial disease were the least effectively managed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    现代重症监护提高了生存率,但是新出现的证据表明,重症监护病房(ICU)后健康问题的患病率很高,包括创伤后应激障碍,抑郁和焦虑。这些症状可能对生活质量产生不利影响并增加死亡率。这项研究的主要目的是检查ICU幸存者开始抗抑郁药物治疗的程度,并确定与其使用相关的因素。次要目标是调查这些药物的使用是否与死亡率增加有关。全国范围的研究队列包括2010年至2017年间收治的125,130名ICU幸存者。在ICU出院后的前3个月内,7%的患者开始服用抗抑郁药物,到1年,15.5%的人开始用药。在2年的随访期间,我们没有发现下降的趋势。与抗抑郁药使用相关的因素包括中年,女性性别,精神病和躯体合并症,物质依赖,疾病严重程度更高,ICU逗留时间更长。抗抑郁药使用者的死亡率更高,在该组中,由于外部原因导致的死亡和自杀更为频繁。这项研究强调了在ICU幸存者中检测和解决抑郁症的重要性,以改善他们的生活质量并降低死亡率。
    Modern intensive care has improved survival rates, but emerging evidence suggests a high prevalence of post-intensive care unit (ICU) health problems, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety. These symptoms may have a detrimental effect on quality of life and increase mortality. The primary objective of this study is to examine the extent of initiation of antidepressant medication among ICU survivors and identify the factors associated with its usage. The secondary objective is to investigate whether the use of these medications is linked to an increased mortality. The nationwide study cohort included 125,130 ICU survivors admitted between 2010 and 2017. Within the first 3 months after ICU discharge, 7% of patients initiated antidepressant medication, by 1 year 15.5% had started medication. We found no tendency to a decrease during the 2-year follow-up period. Factors associated with antidepressant use included middle age, female sex, psychiatric and somatic comorbid conditions, substance dependence, higher illness severity, and longer ICU stay. Antidepressant users had a higher mortality rate, and deaths due to external causes and suicide were more frequent in this group. This study emphasizes the importance of detecting and addressing depression in ICU survivors to improve their quality of life and reduce mortality rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号