pharmacoepidemiology

药物流行病学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较莫诺比拉韦和尼马特雷韦利托那韦治疗非住院和住院COVID-19合并2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的疗效。
    方法:采用序贯试验方法,利用全港电子健康记录进行目标试验仿真。患者(1)年龄≥18岁,(2)与T2DM,(3)COVID-19感染,和(4)在2022年3月16日至2022年12月31日期间,在非医院和医院环境中,在感染后5天内接受莫诺比拉韦或尼马特雷韦-利托那韦的患者被纳入.Molnupiravir和nirmatrelvir-ritonavir发起者使用一对一倾向评分匹配进行匹配,并随访28天。通过校正基线特征的Cox回归比较组间的结果风险。对年龄进行亚组分析(<70岁,≥70岁),性别,Charlson合并症指数(<4,≥4),和COVID-19疫苗剂量的数量(<2剂,≥2剂量)。
    结果:共17974例非住院患者(每组8987例)和3678例住院患者(每组1839例)。非住院nirmatrelvir-ritonavir发起者的全因死亡率风险较低(28天时绝对风险降低[ARR]0.80%,95%置信区间[CI]0.56-1.04;风险比[HR]0.47,95%CI0.30-0.73)和住院(28天ARR4.01%,95%可信区间3.19-4.83;HR0.73,95%可信区间0.66-0.82)与Molnupiravir发起人相比。住院尼马特雷韦-利托那韦的发起人降低了全因死亡率的风险(28天时ARR为2.94%,95%CI1.65-4.23;HR0.56,95%CI0.40-0.80),与莫努普拉韦发起人相比。在所有亚组中发现一致的发现。
    结论:对于任何一种治疗都没有禁忌症的COVID-19T2DM患者,使用尼马特雷韦-利托那韦可能优于莫诺比拉韦。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
    METHODS: Territory-wide electronic health records in Hong Kong were used to perform target trial emulation using a sequential trial approach. Patients (1) aged ≥18 years, (2) with T2DM, (3) with COVID-19 infection, and (4) who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within 5 days of infection between 16 March 2022 and 31 December 2022 in non-hospital and hospital settings were included. Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators were matched using one-to-one propensity-score matching and followed for 28 days. Risk of outcomes was compared between groups by Cox regression adjusted for baseline characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed on age (<70 years, ≥70 years), sex, Charlson comorbidity index (<4, ≥4), and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses (<2 doses, ≥2 doses).
    RESULTS: Totals of 17 974 non-hospitalized (8987 in each group) and 3678 hospitalized (1839 in each group) patients were identified. Non-hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had lower risk of all-cause mortality (absolute risk reduction [ARR] at 28 days 0.80%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-1.04; hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.73) and hospitalization (ARR at 28 days 4.01%, 95% CI 3.19-4.83; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66-0.82) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had reduced risk of all-cause mortality (ARR at 28 days 2.94%, 95% CI 1.65-4.23; HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.80) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Consistent findings were found across all subgroups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir may be preferred to molnupiravir for COVID-19 patients with T2DM and without contraindication to either treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中断时间序列(ITS)设计是评估临床实践或公共卫生中大规模干预措施的常用方法。然而,不正确地使用这种方法会导致有偏差的结果。
    目的:使用ITS设计来研究药物利用研究的设计和统计分析特征,并提出改进建议。
    方法:从2021年1月至2021年12月基于PubMed进行了文献检索。我们纳入了使用ITS设计来调查药物利用的原始文章,而不限制研究人群或结果类型。一个结构化的,开发了经过试点测试的问卷,以提取有关研究特征的信息以及有关设计和统计分析的详细信息。
    结果:我们纳入了153项符合条件的研究。其中,28.1%(43/153)清楚地解释了使用ITS设计的理由,13.7%(21/153)阐明了使用指定的ITS模型结构的理由。一百四十九项研究使用汇总数据进行ITS分析,和20.8%(31/149)澄清了时间点数量的理由。自相关的考虑,这些研究往往缺乏非平稳性和季节性,只有14项研究提到了所有三个方法论问题。在31项研究中提到了缺失的数据。只有39.22%(60/153)报告了回归模型,而15项研究给出了由于时间参数化导致的水平变化的错误解释。在24项研究中考虑了随时间变化的参与者特征。在包含分层数据的97项研究中,23项研究阐明了集群之间的异质性,并使用统计方法来解决这一问题。
    结论:ITS药物利用研究的设计和统计分析质量仍不令人满意。三个新出现的方法问题值得特别关注,包括由于时间参数化导致的水平变化的错误解释,时变参与者特征和层次数据分析。我们提供了有关设计的具体建议,ITS研究的分析和报告。
    BACKGROUND: Interrupted time series (ITS) design is a commonly used method for evaluating large-scale interventions in clinical practice or public health. However, improperly using this method can lead to biased results.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate design and statistical analysis characteristics of drug utilization studies using ITS design, and give recommendations for improvements.
    METHODS: A literature search was conducted based on PubMed from January 2021 to December 2021. We included original articles that used ITS design to investigate drug utilization without restriction on study population or outcome types. A structured, pilot-tested questionnaire was developed to extract information regarding study characteristics and details about design and statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: We included 153 eligible studies. Among those, 28.1% (43/153) clearly explained the rationale for using the ITS design and 13.7% (21/153) clarified the rationale of using the specified ITS model structure. One hundred and forty-nine studies used aggregated data to do ITS analysis, and 20.8% (31/149) clarified the rationale for the number of time points. The consideration of autocorrelation, non-stationary and seasonality was often lacking among those studies, and only 14 studies mentioned all of three methodological issues. Missing data was mentioned in 31 studies. Only 39.22% (60/153) reported the regression models, while 15 studies gave the incorrect interpretation of level change due to time parameterization. Time-varying participant characteristics were considered in 24 studies. In 97 studies containing hierarchical data, 23 studies clarified the heterogeneity among clusters and used statistical methods to address this issue.
    CONCLUSIONS: The quality of design and statistical analyses in ITS studies for drug utilization remains unsatisfactory. Three emerging methodological issues warranted particular attention, including incorrect interpretation of level change due to time parameterization, time-varying participant characteristics and hierarchical data analysis. We offered specific recommendations about the design, analysis and reporting of the ITS study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    目的:钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT-2is)已被证明与癌细胞机制有关。然而,它们是否会增加患癌症的风险尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在确定台湾糖尿病(DM)患者使用SGLT-2i与癌症发病率之间的关系.
    方法:本回顾性队列研究基于台湾国民健康保险数据库。研究人群包括DM患者,在2016-2018年首次使用SGLT-2is的患者被分配到研究组.进行贪婪倾向评分匹配以选择首次使用二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP-4is)的患者,这些患者被分配到对照组。Cox比例风险模型用于估计研究组和对照组癌症风险的调整风险比(aHRs)和95%置信区间(CIs);该模型针对人口统计特征进行了调整,DM严重程度,合并症和合并用药。
    结果:控制相关变量后,SGLT-2i队列(aHR=0.90,95%CI=0.87-0.93)患癌症的风险显著低于DPP-4i队列,特别是当SGLT-2i为达格列净(aHR=0.91,95%CI=0.87-0.95)或依格列净(aHR=0.90,95%CI=0.86-0.94)时.关于癌症类型,SGLT-2i队列的癌症风险显著低于DPP-4i队列的白血病风险,食道,结直肠,肝脏,胰腺,肺,皮肤癌和膀胱癌.
    结论:与使用DPP-4i相比,使用SGLT-2i与癌症风险显著降低相关。
    OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) have been demonstrated to be associated with cancer cell mechanisms. However, whether they increase the risk of cancer remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to determine the association between SGLT-2i use and the incidence of cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in Taiwan.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. The study population comprised patients with DM, and those who first used SGLT-2is during 2016-2018 were assigned to the study group. Greedy propensity score matching was performed to select patients who first used dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), and these patients were assigned to the control group. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer risk in the study and control groups; this model was adjusted for demographic characteristics, DM severity, comorbidities and concomitant medication use.
    RESULTS: After controlling for relevant variables, the SGLT-2i cohort (aHR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.87-0.93) had a significantly lower risk of developing cancer than the DPP-4i cohort, particularly when the SGLT-2i was dapagliflozin (aHR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.87-0.95) or empagliflozin (aHR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.86-0.94). Regarding cancer type, the SGLT-2i cohort\'s risk of cancer was significantly lower than that of the DPP-4i cohort for leukaemia, oesophageal, colorectal, liver, pancreatic, lung, skin and bladder cancer.
    CONCLUSIONS: SGLT-2i use was associated with a significantly lower risk of cancer than DPP-4i use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于在亚洲诊断为双相情感障碍(BD)的患者使用锂盐的临床实践记录很少,我们研究了锂使用的患病率和临床相关性,以支持国际比较.
    方法:我们对13个亚洲站点的BD患者使用和给药的锂盐进行了横断面研究,并评估了锂治疗与临床相关因素的双变量关系,然后进行了多变量逻辑回归建模。
    结果:总共2139名BD参与者(52.3%为女性),平均年龄为42.4岁,锂盐在27.3%的病例中被处方,各地区从3.20%到59.5%不等。与锂治疗相关的是男性,存在精神活动或轻度抑郁,和季节性情绪变化的历史。其他情绪稳定剂通常与锂一起使用,通常在相对较高的剂量。锂的使用与新出现的和剂量依赖性的震颤风险以及甲状腺功能减退的风险有关。我们发现,如果治疗包括锂或不包括锂,临床缓解率或自杀行为没有显着差异。
    结论:研究结果阐明了当前的患病率,给药,亚洲BD锂治疗的临床相关性。此信息应支持有关BD患者治疗的临床决策以及治疗实践的国际比较。
    BACKGROUND: As clinical practices with lithium salts for patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD) are poorly documented in Asia, we studied the prevalence and clinical correlates of lithium use there to support international comparisons.
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of use and dosing of lithium salts for BD patients across 13 Asian sites and evaluated bivariate relationships of lithium treatment with clinical correlates followed by multivariate logistic regression modeling.
    RESULTS: In a total of 2139 BD participants (52.3% women) of mean age 42.4 years, lithium salts were prescribed in 27.3% of cases overall, varying among regions from 3.20% to 59.5%. Associated with lithium treatment were male sex, presence of euthymia or mild depression, and a history of seasonal mood change. Other mood stabilizers usually were given with lithium, often at relatively high doses. Lithium use was associated with newly emerging and dose-dependent risk of tremors as well as risk of hypothyroidism. We found no significant differences in rates of clinical remission or of suicidal behavior if treatment included lithium or not.
    CONCLUSIONS: Study findings clarify current prevalence, dosing, and clinical correlates of lithium treatment for BD in Asia. This information should support clinical decision-making regarding treatment of BD patients and international comparisons of therapeutic practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近的研究表明,接受二甲双胍治疗的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者发生年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的风险降低。然而,其他研究也提示二甲双胍可能增加发生AMD的风险.因此,本研究利用台湾国家健康保险研究数据库调查了二甲双胍治疗与T2DM患者AMD风险之间的关系.方法:纳入2002年至2013年间诊断为新发T2DM的患者。随访5年后,将患者分为接受二甲双胍治疗和未接受二甲双胍治疗的患者,以评估AMD的风险。Logistic回归用于评估与二甲双胍治疗强度相关的AMD风险。结果:共有7517例患者(103.16例/10,000人)在DM诊断后5年内发展为AMD。调整相关变量后,<5个定义日剂量(DDD)/月二甲双胍治疗的T2DM患者发生AMD的风险较低(比值比[OR]:0.93;95%置信区间[CI]:0.880.99).使用>25DDD/月二甲双胍治疗的患者发生AMD的风险更高(OR:1.39;95%CI:1.08-1.78)。结论:二甲双胍的使用可能与T2DM患者发生AMD的风险呈剂量依赖关系,DDD/月较低时的收益更大。然而,较高的DDD/月显示AMD风险增加。
    Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who receive metformin have a decreased risk of developing age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, other studies have also suggested that metformin may increase the risk of AMD development. Therefore, this study investigated the association between treatment with metformin and the risk of AMD in patients with T2DM by using Taiwan\' National Health Insurance Research Database. Methods: Patients who received a diagnosis of new-onset T2DM between 2002 and 2013 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into patients treated and not treated with metformin to evaluate the risk of AMD after 5 years of follow-up. The logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of AMD associated with the intensity of treatment with metformin. Result: A total of 7 517 patients (103.16 patients per 10,000 people) developed AMD in 5 years after DM diagnosis. After adjusting for the relevant variables, patients with T2DM treated with <5 defined daily dose (DDD)/month of metformin had a lower risk of AMD (odds ratios [OR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 0.99). Patients treated with >25 DDD/month of metformin had a higher risk of AMD (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.08-1.78). Conclusion: Metformin use may be associated with a risk of AMD among patients with T2DM in a dose-dependent association manner, with the greater benefit at lower DDD/month. However, higher DDD/month exhibited an increased risk of AMD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:急性肾损伤(AKI)是头孢哌酮-舒巴坦钠和美洛西林-舒巴坦钠临床应用中常见的不良反应。基于现实世界的数据,我们将在此确定住院患者接受这些抗菌药物后与AKI相关的危险因素,我们将开发预测模型来评估AKI的风险。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月山东第一医科大学第一附属医院所有使用头孢哌酮舒巴坦钠和美洛西林舒巴坦钠的成人住院患者资料。数据是通过住院电子病历(EMR)系统收集的,包括一般信息,临床诊断,和潜在的疾病,并利用logistic回归建立AKI风险预测模型.模型的训练严格采用10折交叉验证来验证其准确性,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型性能。结果:本回顾性研究共包括8767例使用头孢哌酮-舒巴坦钠的患者,其中1116人在使用该药物后出现了AKI,发生率为12.73%。共有2887人使用美洛西林-舒巴坦钠,其中265人在接受药物后出现AKI,发病率为9.18%。在服用头孢哌酮-舒巴坦钠的队列中,20个预测因素(p<0.05)用于构建我们的逻辑预测模型,预测模型的AUC为0.83(95%CI,0.82-0.84)。在使用美洛西林-舒巴坦钠的队列中,通过多变量分析确定了9个预测因素(p<0.05),预测模型的AUC为0.74(95%CI,0.71-0.77)。结论:头孢哌酮-舒巴坦钠和美洛西林-舒巴坦钠在住院患者中引起AKI的发生率可能与多种肾毒性药物联合治疗及既往慢性肾脏病史有关。基于逻辑回归的AKI预测模型在预测接受头孢哌酮-舒巴坦钠或美洛西林-舒巴坦钠的成人AKI方面表现良好。
    Objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common adverse reaction observed with the clinical use of cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium and mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium. Based upon real-world data, we will herein determine the risk factors associated with AKI in inpatients after receipt of these antimicrobial drugs, and we will develop predictive models to assess the risk of AKI. Methods: Data from all adult inpatients who used cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium and mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University between January 2018 and December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The data were collected through the inpatient electronic medical record (EMR) system and included general information, clinical diagnosis, and underlying diseases, and logistic regression was exploited to develop predictive models for the risk of AKI. The training of the model strictly adopted 10-fold cross-validation to validate its accuracy, and model performance was evaluated employing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the areas under the curve (AUCs). Results: This retrospective study comprised a total of 8767 patients using cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium, of whom 1116 developed AKI after using the drug, for an incidence of 12.73%. A total of 2887 individuals used mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium, of whom 265 developed AKI after receiving the drug, for an incidence of 9.18%. In the cohort administered cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium, 20 predictive factors (p < 0.05) were applied in constructing our logistic predictive model, and the AUC of the predictive model was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.82-0.84). In the cohort comprising mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium use, nine predictive factors were determined by multivariate analysis (p < 0.05), and the AUC of the predictive model was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.71-0.77). Conclusion: The incidence of AKI induced by cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium and mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium in hospitalized patients may be related to the combined treatment of multiple nephrotoxic drugs and a past history of chronic kidney disease. The AKI-predictive model based on logistic regression showed favorable performance in predicting the AKI of adult in patients who received cefoperazone-sulbactam sodium or mezlocillin-sulbactam sodium.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于与胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)相关的胰腺癌潜在风险的数据越来越多。
    目的:本研究旨在基于FDA不良事件报告系统确定GLP-1RA是否与胰腺癌检测增加相关,并通过文献数据库的关键词共现分析阐明其潜在机制。
    方法:不相称性和贝叶斯分析用于使用报告优势比(ROR)的信号检测,比例报告比率(PRR),信息组件(IC),和经验贝叶斯几何平均值(EBGM)。死亡率,危及生命的事件,和住院情况也进行了调查。采用VOSviewer生成关键词热点的可视化分析。
    结果:3073例胰腺癌与GLP-1RA相关。5个GLP-1RA检测到胰腺癌信号。利拉鲁肽具有最强的信号检测(ROR54.45,95%CI51.21-57.90;PRR52.52,95%CI49.49-55.73;IC5.59;EBGM48.30)。艾塞那肽的信号(ROR37.32,95%CI35.47-39.28;PRR36.45,95%CI34.67-38.32;IC5.00;EBGM32.10)和利西拉那肽(ROR37.07,95%CI9.09-151.09;PRR36.09;95%CIseme9.20-141.64;PR5.17,EB56-95的6.45%的RO5.58-艾塞那肽死亡率最高(63.6%)。根据文献计量调查,cAMP/蛋白激酶,Ca2+通道,内质网应激,和氧化应激是GLP-1RAs导致胰腺癌的潜在发病机制。
    结论:基于这项药物警戒研究,GLP-1RA,除了Albiglutide,与胰腺癌有关。
    BACKGROUND: There are increasing data on the potential risk of pancreatic carcinoma associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs).
    OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine whether GLP-1RAs are associated with increased detection of pancreatic carcinoma based on the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System and clarify its potential mechanisms through keyword co-occurrence analysis from literature database.
    METHODS: Disproportionality and Bayesian analyses were used for signal detection using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), information component (IC), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). Mortality, life-threatening events, and hospitalizations were also investigated. VOSviewer was adopted to generate visual analysis of keyword hotspots.
    RESULTS: A total of 3073 pancreatic carcinoma cases were related to GLP-1RAs. Five GLP-1RAs were detected with signals for pancreatic carcinoma. Liraglutide had the strongest signal detection (ROR 54.45, 95% CI 51.21-57.90; PRR 52.52, 95% CI 49.49-55.73; IC 5.59; EBGM 48.30). The signals of exenatide (ROR 37.32, 95% CI 35.47-39.28; PRR 36.45, 95% CI 34.67-38.32; IC 5.00; EBGM 32.10) and lixisenatide (ROR 37.07, 95% CI 9.09-151.09; PRR 36.09; 95% CI 9.20-141.64; IC 5.17, EBGM 36.09) were stronger than those of semaglutide (ROR 7.43, 95% CI 5.22-10.57; PRR 7.39; 95% CI 5.20-10.50; IC 2.88, EBGM 7.38) and dulaglutide (ROR 6.47, 95% CI 5.56-7.54; PRR 6.45; 95% CI 5.54-7.51; IC 2.67, EBGM 6.38). The highest mortality rate occurred in exenatide (63.6%). Based on the bibliometric investigation, cAMP/protein-kinase, Ca2+ channel, endoplasmic-reticulum stress, and oxidative stress are potential pathogenesis of pancreatic carcinoma resulting from GLP-1RAs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on this pharmacovigilance study, GLP-1RAs, except albiglutide, are associated with pancreatic carcinoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:动物研究表明,哌醋甲酯治疗约3个月可能导致较少矿化和较弱的阑尾骨。进行了系统评价,以总结观察性研究的证据,并采用自我对照病例系列研究比较治疗开始前后的风险.
    方法:使用PubMed进行文献检索,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆来确定哌醋甲酯和骨折的观察性研究。我们还对5-24岁接受哌醋甲酯治疗并在2001-2020年在香港经历骨折的个体进行了自我对照病例系列研究。通过比较哌醋甲酯暴露期与非暴露期的发病率来计算发病率比率和95%置信区间。
    结果:纳入6项队列研究和2项病例对照研究。对于所有原因的骨折,研究发现,与未治疗的ADHD相比,治疗的ADHD组的风险降低了39-74%,但兴奋剂和非兴奋剂没有区别。还发现了性别和治疗持续时间之间的差异-在男性和治疗持续时间较长的人群中显示了显着结果。在2020年之前的43,841名患有ADHD药物的个体中,有2,203人被纳入自我对照病例系列分析。与治疗开始前6个月相比,不同治疗期间的骨折风险降低了32-41%。
    结论:结论:哌醋甲酯治疗可以降低两种研究设计的全因骨折风险,然而,治疗持续时间和性别效应还需要进一步的证据.关于应力性骨折的结论尚未确定,需要进一步研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Animal studies suggest that methylphenidate treatment for around 3 months may lead to less mineralized and weaker appendicular bones. A systematic review was conducted to summarize the evidence from observational studies, and a self-controlled case series study was used to compare the risk before and after treatment initiation.
    METHODS: Literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify observational studies on methylphenidate and fractures. We also conducted a self-controlled case series study with individuals aged 5-24 years who received methylphenidate treatment and experienced fractures from 2001 to 2020 in Hong Kong. Incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by comparing the incidence rate in the methylphenidate-exposed period compared with nonexposed period.
    RESULTS: Six cohort studies and 2 case-control studies were included in the systematic review. For all-cause fractures, studies found a 39-74% lower risk in treated-attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) group compared with untreated ADHD but no difference between stimulants and nonstimulants. Differences between sexes and treatment duration were also found-significant results were shown in males and those with longer treatment duration. Among 43 841 individuals with ADHD medication before the year 2020, 2023 were included in the self-controlled case series analysis. The risks of fractures were lower by 32-41% in different treatment periods when compared with 6 months before treatment initiation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Methylphenidate treatment may lower the risk of all-cause fractures from both study designs; however, further evidence is needed about the treatment duration and sex effect. Conclusions on stress fractures are not yet established, and further research is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:与类似疗法相比,持续扩大钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂的适应症增加了评估2型糖尿病患者使用依帕列净的心血管和肾脏疗效和安全性的重要性。
    方法:EMPRISE欧洲和亚洲研究是一项非干预性队列研究,使用2014-2019年在七个欧洲(丹麦,芬兰,德国,挪威,西班牙,瑞典,英国)和四个亚洲人(以色列,Japan,韩国,台湾)国家。2型糖尿病患者服用依帕列净与服用二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂患者的倾向评分为1:1。主要终点包括心力衰竭住院,全因死亡率,心肌梗死和中风。其他心血管,肾,并检查安全性结果.
    结果:在83,946对匹配的患者中,(0·7年总体平均随访时间),与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂相比,开始使用依帕列净与心力衰竭住院风险较低相关(危害比0·70;95CI0.60~0.83).全因死亡风险(0·55;0·48至0·63),行程(0·82;0·71至0·96),终末期肾病(0·43;0·30至0·63)较低,心肌梗死的风险较低,骨折,严重低血糖,empagliflozin和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂的引发剂之间的下肢截肢相似。与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂相比,开始使用依帕列净与糖尿病酮症酸中毒的风险更高(1·97;1·28至3·03)。各大洲和地区的结果一致。
    结论:这项EMPRISE欧洲和亚洲研究的结果通过提供与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂相比,依帕列净有益的心肾作用和总体安全性的进一步证据,补充了先前的临床试验和现实世界的研究。
    Continued expansion of indications for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors increases importance of evaluating cardiovascular and kidney efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to similar therapies.
    The EMPRISE Europe and Asia study is a non-interventional cohort study using data from 2014-2019 in seven European (Denmark, Finland, Germany, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom) and four Asian (Israel, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan) countries. Patients with type 2 diabetes initiating empagliflozin were 1:1 propensity score matched to patients initiating dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Primary endpoints included hospitalization for heart failure, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke. Other cardiovascular, renal, and safety outcomes were examined.
    Among 83,946 matched patient pairs, (0·7 years overall mean follow-up time), initiation of empagliflozin was associated with lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (Hazard Ratio 0·70; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83). Risks of all-cause mortality (0·55; 0·48 to 0·63), stroke (0·82; 0·71 to 0·96), and end-stage renal disease (0·43; 0·30 to 0·63) were lower and risk for myocardial infarction, bone fracture, severe hypoglycemia, and lower-limb amputation were similar between initiators of empagliflozin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Initiation of empagliflozin was associated with higher risk for diabetic ketoacidosis (1·97; 1·28 to 3·03) compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Results were consistent across continents and regions.
    Results from this EMPRISE Europe and Asia study complements previous clinical trials and real-world studies by providing further evidence of the beneficial cardiorenal effects and overall safety of empagliflozin compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号