open surgery

开放手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管微创结直肠手术已被证明比开腹手术住院时间短,短期并发症少,腹腔镜手术对接受血液透析的结直肠癌患者的优势尚未得到验证.这项研究比较了这些患者的开腹和腹腔镜方法的结果。
    方法:2007年1月至2020年12月,我们回顾性分析了78例接受治疗的血液透析患者的临床资料。择期结直肠手术。根据手术方式将患者分为开腹和腹腔镜两组。
    结果:术后发病率(p=0.480)和死亡率(p=0.598)以及住院时间(28.8vs.27.5天,p=0.830)组间相似。然而,腹腔镜手术患者恢复清液的时间较短,全液体,或软食时间比开放手术患者(分别为p<0.001,p=0.007和p=0.002)。两组之间的无病生存率和长期癌症特异性生存率也相似(分别为p=0.353和p=0.201)。多因素分析显示术中输血是严重并发症和死亡的危险因素(OR6.055;p=0.046)。腹腔镜手术的比值比(OR)不明显大于开腹手术(OR=0.537,p=0.337)。
    结论:尽管腹腔镜手术并未导致血液透析患者术后住院时间缩短,我们的研究结果提示,对于血液透析患者,腹腔镜手术与开腹手术一样安全,并且可能有利于缩短恢复食物摄入的时间。
    OBJECTIVE: Although minimally invasive colorectal surgery has been proven to have a shorter hospital stay and fewer short-term complications than open surgery, the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients undergoing hemodialysis have not been validated. This study compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic approaches in these patients.
    METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2020, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 78 hemodialysis patients who underwent curative-intent, elective colorectal surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method: open and laparoscopic.
    RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity (p = 0.480) and mortality (p = 0.598) rates and length of hospital stay (28.8 vs. 27.5 days, p = 0.830) were similar between the groups. However, laparoscopic surgery patients had a shorter return to clear liquid, full liquid, or soft food time than open surgery patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, and p = 0.002, respectively). Disease-free survival and long-term cancer-specific survival rates were also similar between the two groups (p = 0.353 and p = 0.201, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that intraoperative blood transfusion was a risk factor for severe complications and mortality (OR 6.055; p = 0.046), and the odds ratio (OR) of laparoscopic surgery was not significantly greater than that of open surgery (OR = 0.537, p = 0.337).
    CONCLUSIONS: Although laparoscopic surgery did not result in hemodialysis patients having a shorter postoperative hospital stay, our results suggest that the laparoscopic approach is as safe as open surgery for hemodialysis patients and may be beneficial for shortening the return time to food intake.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于缺乏大样本的循证医学研究,直肠神经内分泌肿瘤根治术的手术方式仍存在争议.
    方法:我们回顾性收集了2010年1月1日至2022年4月30日在中国17家大型三级医院接受根治性切除术的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤患者的病历。将所有患者分为腹腔镜组和开腹手术组。在倾向得分匹配以减少混杂因素之后,比较了两组的术后和肿瘤结局.
    结果:我们招募了174例接受根治性手术的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤患者。随机匹配后,124例患者归入对比(62例,腹腔镜手术组;62例,开腹手术组)。腹腔镜手术组并发症较少(14.5%vs.35.5%,P=0.007)和优越的无复发生存率(P=0.048)。亚组分析显示,腹腔镜手术组并发症较少(10.9%vs.34.7%,P=0.004),术后住院时间较短(9.56±5.21天vs.12.31±8.61天,P=0.049)和直肠神经内分泌肿瘤≤4cm亚组的无复发生存率(P=0.025)。
    结论:腹腔镜手术治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤≤4cm患者,可改善术后预后,可作为一种安全可行的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤根治术选择。
    BACKGROUND: Owing to the lack of evidence-based medical studies with large sample sizes, the surgical approach for the radical resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors remains controversial.
    METHODS: We retrospectively collected the medical records of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical resection at 17 large tertiary care hospitals in China between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2022. All patients were divided into laparoscopic and open surgery groups. After propensity score matching to reduce confounders, the postoperative and oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups.
    RESULTS: We enrolled 174 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical surgery. After random matching, 124 patients were included in the comparison (62, laparoscopic surgery group; 62, open surgery group). The laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (14.5% vs. 35.5%, P = 0.007) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.048). Subgroup analysis revealed that the laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (10.9% vs. 34.7%, P = 0.004), shorter postoperative hospital stays (9.56 ± 5.21 days vs. 12.31 ± 8.61 days, P = 0.049) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.025) in the rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm subgroup.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery was associated with improved postoperative outcomes and oncologic prognosis for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm; it can serve as a safe and feasible option for radical surgery of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    下腔静脉滤器通常使用血管内手术取回。然而,在出现与过滤器相关的并发症或血管内修复变得具有挑战性的情况下,可以考虑开放手术。
    一名65岁的女性因进行性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)接受了下腔静脉滤器置入手术。两个月后,在外部医院进行了一次失败的血管内取回尝试,她经历了腹痛,并被转移到我们的设施进行进一步治疗。检查显示,她遇到了并发症,下腔静脉过滤器在植入后同时穿透了腔静脉和十二指肠。但幸运的是,患者的血液检查结果在正常范围内。最终,我们的机构通过开放手术成功移除过滤器,患者出院,没有任何并发症。
    这种情况下,随着我们的文献综述,说明了通过开放手术去除十二指肠穿透过滤器的可行性和安全性,为患者带来有利的结果和有希望的预后。
    UNASSIGNED: Inferior vena cava filters are typically retrieved using endovascular procedures. However, in cases where complications related to the filter arise or when endovascular retrieval becomes challenging, open surgery could be considered.
    UNASSIGNED: A 65-year-old woman underwent inferior vena cava filter placement surgery for progressive venous thrombosis embolism (VTE). Following an unsuccessful endovascular retrieval attempt at an external hospital two months later, she experienced abdominal pain and was transferred to our facility for further treatment. Examination revealed that she was encountered a complication where the inferior vena cava filter penetrated both the vena cava and the duodenum post-implantation. But fortunately, the patient\'s blood test results were within normal range. Ultimately, our institution successfully removed the filter through open surgery and the patient was discharged without any complications.
    UNASSIGNED: This case, along with our literature review, illustrates the viability and safety of duodenal-penetrated filter removal via open surgery, resulting in favorable outcomes and a promising prognosis for the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨腹腔镜手术在老年(≥75岁)结直肠癌患者中的应用价值。并确定影响该人口统计学长期生存的预后因素,并建立预测列线图模型。
    方法:回顾性分析宝鸡市人民医院2016年8月至2018年2月146例老年(≥75岁)结直肠癌根治术患者的临床资料,其中开腹手术55例,腹腔镜手术91例。使用Kaplan-Meier方法绘制生存曲线,使用Log-rank检验评估预后差异。使用Cox比例风险模型分析了各种因素对5年生存率的预后影响。在Cox模型中确定的重要预测因子用于构建预测生存的列线图,然后验证准确性和临床实用性。
    结果:腹腔镜手术可缩短住院时间(P=0.022)。虽然成本较高(P=0.011)。腹腔镜组术中出血较少(P<0.001),切口长度(P<0.001),术后首次排痰时间(P<0.001),术后第一次进食时间(P=0.002),术后腹腔引流时间与开放手术组比较(P=0.003)。此外,腹腔镜组术后伤口并发症的发生率也较低(P=0.014).两组治疗后5年生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.150)。多因素Cox回归分析显示有糖尿病史(P=0.037),血管浸润(P=0.026),神经束侵犯(P=0.001),TNM分期(P=0.001)是影响晚期结直肠癌患者5年生存率的独立预后因素。构建的列线图对1-,3-,5年生存率,AUC值分别为0.91、0.87和0.79。校准曲线和决策曲线分析证实了模型的临床实用性。风险公式:糖尿病病史*-0.696194503+血管浸润*-0.769736513+神经束侵犯*-1.1709777+TNM分期*1.201933691。
    结论:与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术可以减少老年(≥75岁)结直肠癌患者的术中创伤,加速术后恢复。建立的列线图模型基于独立的预后因素,如糖尿病史,血管浸润,神经束侵入,和TNM分期,促进量身定制的预后评估,加强患者个人管理。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application value of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with colorectal cancer, and to identify the prognostic factors influencing the long-term survival in this demographic, and to establish a predictive nomogram model.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 146 elderly (≥ 75 years old) colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery in Baoji People\'s Hospital from August 2016 to February 2018, including 55 patients who underwent laparotomy and 91 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in prognosis were assessed using the Log-rank test. Prognostic impacts of various factors on 5-year survival were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Significant predictors identified in the Cox model were used to construct a nomogram for predicting survival, which was then validated for accuracy and clinical utility.
    RESULTS: Laparoscopic surgery was associated with shorter hospital stays (P = 0.022), although at a higher cost (P = 0.011). The laparoscopic group also had less intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001), incision length (P < 0.001), time to first postoperative expectoration (P < 0.001), time to first postoperative feeding (P = 0.002), and time to postoperative peritoneal drainage (P = 0.003) compared to the open surgery group. Additionally, the rate of postoperative wound complications was also lower in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in the 5-year post-treatment survival between the two groups (P = 0.150). Multifactorial Cox regression analysis revealed that a history of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.037), vascular infiltration (P = 0.026), nerve bundle invasion (P = 0.001), and TNM stage (P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors affecting the 5-year survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The constructed nomogram showed high predictive accuracy for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, with AUC values of 0.91, 0.87, and 0.79, respectively. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis confirmed the model\'s clinical utility. Risk formula: History of diabetes mellitus * -0.696194503 + Vascular infiltration * -0.769736513 + Nerve bundle invasion * -1.1709777 + TNM staging * 1.201933691.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery can reduce intraoperative trauma and accelerate postoperative recovery in elderly colorectal cancer patients (≥ 75 years) compared to open surgery. The developed nomogram model based on independent prognostic factors such as diabetes history, vascular infiltration, nerve bundle invasion, and TNM staging, facilitates tailored prognostic assessment, enhancing individual patient management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    包虫病在某些动物繁殖普遍的地理区域流行,经常挑战这些地区的医疗服务。包虫囊肿最常影响肝脏,对其他器官的损害约占总病例的三分之一。介入或药理学方法的替代方法是手术治疗,可用于腹腔镜检查等变体,包虫病用特殊器械进行腹腔镜检查,或者开腹手术.本文旨在分析这三种手术方式的效果,考虑到术前适应症,手术技术和效率,以及术后的即时和长期结果。在7年的时间里,共分析了来自两个不同外科单元的149名患者。观察到男性受此病理影响更大(53.02%),大多数患者来自农村地区(62.42%)。按手术类型划分的分布显示,50.34%的患者采用开放手术,33.56%通过腹腔镜方法与通常的器械,通过使用特殊器械的腹腔镜方法,占16.11%。与通常的腹腔镜方法相比,使用特殊器械的腹腔镜手术的转化率较低(p=0.014)。对平均手术时间的分析显示,三种手术技术之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05),注意到使用专门工具进行干预的持续时间最短,而开放手术的手术时间最长(72.5±27.23minvs.154±52.04分钟)。在术中并发症方面,在使用特殊仪器进行手术的组中,有8.34%的病例被记录下来,在12.24%的病例中,标准腹腔镜组,和16%的病例为开放手术组。最大膀胱切除术是使用微创手术解决这些囊肿的首选方法(p<0.001),而Lagrot包膜切除术在开放入路中更受欢迎(p<0.001)。术后最常见的并发症是胆瘘(24.16%),在每种技术中遇到不同的百分比,但没有显著的统计学差异(p>0.05)。与微创手术相比,开放手术的住院时间更长(p<0.05)。术后晚期并发症较多(p=0.002),与其他两种技术相比,复发次数明显更高(p<0.001)。本研究强调了微创手术治疗包虫囊肿的有效性,是一种安全的替代方法,与开放手术相比,并发症少,效果更好。此外,它提供了这些手术方法的比较分析(特殊器械,标准腹腔镜检查,和开放手术)首次针对包虫病。在建议在手术前后进行药物治疗作为支持措施的情况下,单独使用药物作为主要治疗选择仅显示出适度的疗效,有必要考虑侵入性治疗方法。经皮手术是侵入性最小的治疗形式,在疗效方面产生与手术相当的结果。然而,它们的有效性受到诸如囊肿的发育阶段等因素的影响,它的位置,以及实现完全程序内隔离的挑战。腹腔镜检查,特别是当使用针对包虫病管理的战术和技术需求而定制的专门仪器时,用于解决经皮方法的局限性。开放手术的作用日益受到限制,主要作为腹腔镜手术或包虫病并发病例的后备选择。总之,尽管经皮方法越来越受欢迎,手术仍然是治疗包虫病的可行治疗选择。微创手术干预越来越通用,并产生可比的结果,进一步巩固手术在其管理中的作用。
    Hydatid disease is endemic in certain geographical areas where animal breeding is common, frequently challenging the medical services in these regions. Hydatid cysts most often affect the liver, with damage to other organs accounting for around one-third of the total cases. The alternative to interventional or pharmacological approaches is surgical treatment, available in variants such as laparoscopy, laparoscopy with special instruments for hydatid disease, or open surgery. This article aims to analyze the outcomes of these three types of surgical approaches, considering preoperative indications, operative techniques and efficiency, and immediate and long-term postoperative results. A total of 149 patients from two different surgical units were analyzed over a period of seven years. It was observed that males were more affected by this pathology (53.02%), with the majority of patients coming from rural areas (62.42%). The distribution by surgical procedure type showed that 50.34% were operated on using open surgery, 33.56% by means of a laparoscopic approach with the usual instruments, and 16.11% by means of a laparoscopic approach with special instruments. The laparoscopic procedure with special instruments presented a lower rate of conversion to open surgery compared to the usual laparoscopic approach (p = 0.014). The analysis of the average operative duration revealed statistically significant differences between the three types of surgical techniques (p < 0.05), noting that interventions with specialized instruments had the shortest duration, while open surgery had the longest operative time (72.5 ± 27.23 min vs. 154 ± 52.04 min). In terms of intraoperative complications, they were documented in 8.34% of cases for the group operated on with special instruments, in 12.24% of cases for the standard laparoscopy group, and in 16% of cases for the open surgery group. Maximal cystectomy was the preferred method for resolving these cysts using minimally invasive surgery (p < 0.001), while Lagrot pericystectomy was preferred in the open approach (p < 0.001). The most frequent postoperative complication was biliary fistula (24.16%), encountered in varying percentages across each technique but without significant statistical difference (p > 0.05). Open surgery was associated with a longer length of hospitalization compared to minimally invasive procedures (p < 0.05), a higher number of late postoperative complications (p = 0.002), and a significantly higher number of recurrences (p < 0.001) compared to the other two techniques. The present study highlights the effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery for hydatid cysts as a safe alternative with fewer complications and superior results compared to open surgery. Additionally, it provides a comparative analysis of these surgical approaches (special instruments, standard laparoscopy, and open surgery) to hydatid disease for the first time. Under the circumstances where pharmacological treatment is recommended as a supportive measure before and after procedures, and using medication alone as the primary treatment option shows only modest efficacy, there is a necessity to consider invasive treatment methods. Percutaneous procedures represent the least invasive form of treatment, yielding results comparable to surgery in terms of efficacy. However, their effectiveness is influenced by factors such as the cyst\'s stage of development, its location, and the challenges in achieving complete intra-procedural isolation. Laparoscopy, particularly when using specialized instruments tailored to the tactical and technical demands of managing hydatid disease, serves to address the limitations of percutaneous methods. Open surgery\'s role is increasingly restricted, primarily serving as a fallback option in laparoscopic procedures or in cases complicated by hydatid disease. In conclusion, despite the rising popularity of percutaneous methods, surgery remains a viable therapeutic option for treating hydatid disease. Minimally invasive surgical interventions are increasingly versatile and yield comparable outcomes, further solidifying the role of surgery in its management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝包虫囊肿是全球分布的人畜共患病的一个例子,但在某些地理区域具有地方性特征。自古以来就知道,这种主要影响肝脏和肺的寄生虫感染在诊断和药理学方面仍然是今天的挑战,放射学,内窥镜,或者手术治疗.这项研究分析了锡比乌县临床急诊医院收治的76例患者与不同方法治疗包虫囊肿相关的并发症。并发症发生在18例(23.7%),与年龄没有显著相关性,性别,或居住地(城市或农村)。与接受其他手术治疗的患者相比,接受开放手术的患者并发症发生率最高(61.1%)。最常见的并发症是胆管破裂,发生在22.7%的病例中。我们的研究结果表明,并发症的存在显着延长住院时间[tdf(75)=12.14,p<0.001]。基于这些发现,我们得出的结论是,包虫囊肿的手术方法应根据每位患者的具体情况精心定制,以降低并发症的风险并改善临床结局。
    Hepatic hydatid cysts are an example of a zoonosis with global distribution, but with endemic characteristics in certain geographic areas. Known since ancient times, this parasitic infection predominantly affecting the liver and lungs remains a challenge today in terms of diagnosis and the pharmacological, radiological, endoscopic, or surgical therapy. This study analyzed the complications associated with different procedures for treating hydatid cysts in 76 patients admitted to the County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu. Complications occurred in 18 patients (23.7%), with no significant correlation to age, gender, or residency (urban or rural). Patients undergoing open surgery exhibited the highest complication rate (61.1%) compared to those treated with other procedures. The most frequent complication was biliary duct rupture, occurring in 22.7% of cases. Our findings indicate that the presence of complications significantly prolongs hospitalization time [t df (75) = 12.14, p < 0.001]. Based on these findings, we conclude that the surgical approach for hydatid cysts should be meticulously tailored to each patient\'s specific circumstances to reduce the risk of complications and improve clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管并发症是肾移植术后严重的手术并发症之一,如果治疗不当,可能会影响移植结果,甚至危及生命。我们对1月之间完成的2,304例肾移植手术进行了回顾性分析,2015年1月,2022年,共有1658名男性患者和646名女性患者。在上述情况中,肾移植术后有54例血管并发症,我们研究中血管并发症的发生率为2.34%(54/2,304),最常见的血管并发症是移植肾动脉狭窄(TRAS,n=36),其次是髂外动脉夹层(n=5),肾动脉破裂(n=4),肾静脉血栓形成(n=3),肾动脉血栓形成(n=2),肾动脉夹层(n=1),肾动脉假性动脉瘤(n=1),髂内动脉假性动脉瘤(n=1),和肾动脉扭结(n=1)。40例患者行经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA),包括3个球囊导管扩张和37个血管内支架,14人接受了开放手术。最终,9例患者进行了移植肾切除术,总体治疗率为81.5%。PTA可以令人满意地治疗大多数血管并发症。然而,肾动脉破裂的整体治疗,血栓形成,肾动脉扭结,其他并发症很差,移植肾损失率高。
    Vascular complications after renal transplantation are one of the serious surgical complications, which can affect the transplantation outcome and even endanger life if not treated properly. We performed a retrospective analysis of the 2,304 renal transplantations procedures completed between the period of Jan., 2015 and Jan., 2022, which consisted of 1,658 male patients and 646 female patients. Among the above cases, there were 54 cases of vascular complications after renal transplantation, the incidence of vascular complications in our study was 2.34% (54/2,304), the most common vascular complication was transplanted renal artery stenosis (TRAS, n = 36), followed by external iliac artery dissection (n = 5), renal artery rupture (n = 4), renal vein thrombosis (n = 3), renal artery thrombosis (n = 2), renal artery dissection (n = 1), renal artery pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), and internal iliac artery pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), and renal artery kinking (n = 1). 40 patients were treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), including 3 balloon catheter dilatation and 37 endovascular stentings, and 14 underwent open surgery. Eventually, 9 patients had graft nephrectomy, resulting in an overall treatment rate of 81.5%. Most vascular complications can be treated satisfactorily with PTA. However, the overall treatment of renal artery rupture, thrombosis, renal artery kinking, and other complications is poor, and the rate of transplanted renal loss is high.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:腹腔镜手术已得到结肠癌临床指南的认可,但不适用于直肠癌,原因是未经批准的肿瘤学与开放手术相当。
    目的:我们开始了这项迄今为止最大的荟萃分析,以全面评估腹腔镜与开腹手术相比在直肠癌治疗中的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在PubMed中搜索了1990年1月至2020年3月之间比较腹腔镜直肠切除术和开腹手术的随机和非随机对照试验,Cochrane图书馆和Embase数据库(PROSPERO注册号CRD42020211718)。术中的数据,病态,比较两组患者术后和生存结果.
    结果:20个RCT和93个NRCT,包括216,615名患者符合纳入标准,其中48,888例患者接受腹腔镜手术,167,727例患者接受开腹手术.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术组恢复较快,30天内并发症少,死亡率降低。腹腔镜手术组环周切缘(RR=0.79,95%CI:0.72~0.85,p<0.0001)和远切缘(RR=0.75,95%CI:0.66~0.85p<0.0001)阳性率显著降低,但全直肠系膜切除的完整性无显著差异。3年和5年局部复发,腹腔镜手术组的无病生存率和总生存率均有所提高,而两种方法之间的远端复发没有显着差异。
    结论:在肿瘤学结果和长期生存率方面,腹腔镜检查在直肠癌治疗中不劣于开腹手术。此外,腹腔镜手术提供了短期优势,包括更快的恢复和更少的并发症。
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has been endorsed by clinical guidelines for colon cancer, but not for rectal cancer on account of unapproved oncologic equivalence with open surgery.
    OBJECTIVE: We started this largest-to-date meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal cancer compared with open surgery.
    METHODS: Both randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic proctectomy and open surgery between January 1990 and March 2020 were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase Databases (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020211718). The data of intraoperative, pathological, postoperative and survival outcomes were compared between two groups.
    RESULTS: Twenty RCTs and 93 NRCTs including 216,615 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with 48,888 patients received laparoscopic surgery and 167,727 patients underwent open surgery. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery group showed faster recovery, less complications and decreased mortality within 30 days. The positive rate of circumferential margin (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.85, p < 0.0001) and distal margin (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.85 p < 0.0001) was significantly reduced in the laparoscopic surgery group, but the completeness of total mesorectal excision showed no significant difference. The 3-year and 5-year local recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival were all improved in the laparoscopic surgery group, while the distal recurrence did not differ significantly between the two approaches.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer with respect to oncological outcomes and long-term survival. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery provides short-term advantages, including faster recovery and less complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通过分离腹壁,腹横肌释放(TAR)允许重建腹壁并放置大网孔,以治疗许多类型的疝。然而,在临界情况下,层的流动性不足,和额外的桥接技术可能需要无张力闭合。我们现在提供这方面的数据。患者和方法:2023年,作为疝修补术的一部分,我们对50例患者进行了腹横肌松解术。该程序是使用开放式(n=25)进行的,机器人(n=24),和腹腔镜(n=1)技术。疝囊总是整合到前缝线中,在内侧疝的情况下,用于lineaalba重建。结果:对于内侧疝,22例进行了开放性TAR。在这些病例中,有7例进行了额外的后路桥接。在没有桥接的患者中,TAR平面中的网孔尺寸与缺损面积(中位数,厘米)的比率为1200cm2/177cm2=6.8,和1750cm2/452cm2=3.8的那些桥接。手术时间(以分钟为中位数)为139和222分钟,住院时间为6和10天,分别。机器人TAR主要用于外侧和造口旁疝。这些手术的中位数为143和242分钟,住院时间是2天和3天,分别。对于机器人修复,3例进行后路桥接。讨论:使用TAR技术,即使是复杂的疝气也可以安全修复。额外的后部桥接提供了后部平面与肠的可靠分离。因此,疝囊始终可用于白线的前部重建。该技术可以实施为开放式或微创手术。
    Background: By separating the abdominal wall, transversus abdominis release (TAR) permits reconstruction of the abdominal wall and the placement of large mesh for many types of hernias. However, in borderline cases, the mobility of the layers is inadequate, and additional bridging techniques may be required for tension-free closure. We now present our own data in this regard. Patients and Methods: In 2023, we performed transversus abdominis release on 50 patients as part of hernia repair. The procedures were carried out using open (n = 25), robotic (n = 24), and laparoscopic (n = 1) techniques. The hernia sac was always integrated into the anterior suture and, in the case of medial hernias, was used for linea alba reconstruction. Results: For medial hernias, open TAR was performed in 22 cases. Additional posterior bridging was performed in 7 of these cases. The ratio of mesh size in the TAR plane to the defect area (median in cm) was 1200cm2/177 cm2 = 6.8 in patients without bridging, and 1750cm2/452 cm2 = 3.8 in those with bridging. The duration of surgery (median in min) was 139 and 222 min and the hospital stay was 6 and 10 days, respectively. Robotic TAR was performed predominantly for lateral and parastomal hernias. These procedures took a median of 143 and 242 min, and the hospital stay was 2 and 3 days, respectively. For robotic repair, posterior bridging was performed in 3 cases. Discussion: Using the TAR technique, even complex hernias can be safely repaired. Additional posterior bridging provides a reliable separation of the posterior plane from the intestines. Therefore, the hernia sac is always available for anterior reconstruction of the linea alba. The technique can be implemented as an open or minimally invasive procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对腹腔镜胆囊癌(GBC)根治术的安全性的担忧仍然存在。这项系统评价和荟萃分析试图比较腹腔镜手术(LS)与开腹手术(OS)治疗GBC的安全性和有效性。
    PubMed,EMBASE,和WebofScience从成立到2022年7月18日进行了搜索。文献检索,质量评估,和数据提取独立完成,一式两份。在随机效应模型下得出以加权平均差(WMD)或比值比(OR)表示的效应大小估计值,置信区间为95%(CI)。
    对包括2,868名参与者在内的27项独立研究进行了荟萃分析。术中失血量有显著性意义(WMD:-117.194,95%CI:-170.188至64.201,P<0.001),收集的淋巴结(WMD:-1.023,95%CI:-1.776至-0.269,P=0.008),术后住院时间(WMD:-3.555,95%CI:-4.509至-2.601,P<0.001),术后发病率(OR:0.596,95%CI:0.407~0.871,P=0.008),2年总生存率(OR:1.524,95%CI:1.143至2.031,P=0.004),T2生存率在1年(OR:1.799,95%CI:1.777至2.749,P<0.01)和2年(OR:2.026,95%CI:1.392至2.949,P<0.001),以及1年(OR:2.669,95%CI:1.564至4.555,P<0.001)和2年(OR:2.300,95%CI:1.308至4.046,P=0.004)的T3生存率。亚组分析显示,种族,附带GBC,样本量,和随访期是异质性的可能来源。除术后发病率外,所有结局的发表偏倚概率较低。
    我们的研究结果表明,从统计学上讲,LS具有更好的2年生存率,术中出血少,住院时间缩短,并发症发生率低于OS。然而,由于附带GBC的影响,LS的优越性甚至安全性仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,下落不明的异质性,出版偏见,淋巴结清扫术,和端口部位转移。
    UNASSIGNED: Concerns over the security of laparoscopic radical operation for gallbladder cancer (GBC) persist. This systematic review and meta-analysis attempted to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus open surgery (OS) in the treatment of GBC.
    UNASSIGNED: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 18, 2022. Literature search, quality assessment, and data extraction were completed independently and in duplicate. Effect-size estimates expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were derived under the random-effects model.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 27 independent studies including 2,868 participants were meta-analyzed. Significance was noted for intraoperative blood loss (WMD: -117.194, 95% CI: -170.188 to 64.201, P<0.001), harvested lymph nodes (WMD: -1.023, 95% CI: -1.776 to -0.269, P=0.008), postoperative hospital stay (WMD: -3.555, 95% CI: -4.509 to -2.601, P<0.001), postoperative morbidity (OR: 0.596, 95% CI: 0.407 to 0.871, P=0.008), overall survival rate at 2-year (OR: 1.524, 95% CI: 1.143 to 2.031, P=0.004), T2 survival at 1-year (OR: 1.799, 95% CI: 1.777 to 2.749, P<0.01) and 2-year (OR: 2.026, 95% CI: 1.392 to 2.949, P<0.001), as well as T3 survival at 1-year (OR: 2.669, 95% CI: 1.564 to 4.555, P<0.001) and 2-year (OR: 2.300, 95% CI: 1.308 to 4.046, P=0.004). Subgroup analyses revealed that ethnicity, incidental GBC, sample size, and follow-up period were possible sources of heterogeneity. There was a low probability of publication bias for all outcomes except postoperative morbidity.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings indicated that LS statistically had better 2-year survival rates, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospitalization times, and lower rates of complications than OS. However, the superiority and even the safety of LS still remain an open question due to the impact of incidental GBC, unaccounted heterogeneity, publication bias, lymph node dissection, and port-site metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号