Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (bAVMs) are rare but high-risk developmental anomalies of the vascular system. Microsurgery through craniotomy is believed to be the mainstay standard treatment for many grades of bAVMs. However, a significant challenge emerges in the existing body of clinical studies on open surgery for bAVMs: the lack of reproducibility and comparability. This study aims to assess the quality of studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes for bAVMs treated by open surgery and develop a reporting guideline checklist focusing on essential elements to ensure comparability and reproducibility. This is a systematic literature review that followed the PRISMA guidelines with the search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for studies published between January 1, 2018, and December 1, 2023. Included studies were scrutinized focusing on seven domains: (1) Assessment of How Studies Reported on the Baseline Characteristics of the Patient Sample; (2) Assessment and reporting on bAVMs grading, anatomical characteristics, and radiological aspects; (3) Angioarchitecture Assessment and Reporting; (4) Reporting on Pivotal Concepts Definitions; (5) Reporting on Neurosurgeon(s) and Staff Characteristics; (6) Reporting on Surgical Details; (7) Assessing and Reporting Clinical and Surgical Outcomes and AEs. A total of 47 studies comprising 5,884 patients were included. The scrutiny of the studies identified that the current literature in bAVM open surgery is deficient in many aspects, ranging from fundamental pieces of information of methodology to baseline characteristics of included patients and data reporting. Included studies demonstrated a lack of reproducibility that hinders building cumulative evidence. A bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline with 65 items distributed across eight domains was developed and is proposed in this study aiming to address these shortcomings. This systematic review identified that the available literature regarding microsurgery for bAVM treatment, particularly in studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes, lacks rigorous scientific methodology and quality in reporting. The proposed bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline covers all essential aspects and is a potential solution to address these shortcomings and increase transparency, comparability, and reproducibility in this scenario. This proposal aims to advance the level of evidence and enhance knowledge regarding the Open Surgery treatment for bAVMs.

OBJECTIVE: Competency-based education has mandated accurate intra-operative assessment tools. We aimed to define consensus-based open surgical skills perceived by experts as critical for assessment.
METHODS: A mixed-method design was employed: systematic review and e-Delphi methodology.
METHODS: The study was performed at McGill University-affiliated large tertiary academic centers in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
METHODS: Per PRISMA guidelines, a peer-reviewed search strategy was employed. Studies published in English and those describing technical skill assessment of open abdominal surgery were included; subspecialty-specific skills, conference abstracts, academic memoirs were excluded. Most-cited skills were subjected to e-Delphi methodology to identify those deemed essential by experts, based a 3-point Likert scale. Eighteen McGill University-affiliated general surgeons, representing a variety of subspecialties of General Surgery, were invited to answer the questionnaire.
RESULTS: Around 120 of 4285 references were retained for analysis. The 12 most cited skills included suturing, tissue and instrument handling, movement economy, instrument knowledge, knot tying, flow, knowledge of procedure, completion time, dissection technique, knowledge of anatomy and sterile technique; 6 of these achieved high or perfect scores and agreement after 2 rounds of survey: suturing, sterile technique, knot tying, knowledge of anatomy, knowledge of procedure, and tissue handling. Median standard deviation decreased (0.495 to 0.450) from first to second round, indicating improvement in consensus.
CONCLUSIONS: These results will help develop and validate the OSCAR (objective structured clinical assessment rubric) assessment tool for immediate intra-operative feedback of open technical skills for surgical trainees.