open surgery

开放手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前已经报道了内窥镜切除血管异常(VA)。然而,没有研究比较儿童内镜切除手术(ERS)和开放切除手术(ORS).我们旨在比较两种方法在小儿VA中的临床和美容结果。
    方法:在2018年6月至2023年6月之间,对138例接受ERS或ORS的儿科VA患者进行了回顾性分析。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以最大程度地减少选择偏差。采用基于患者满意度的瘢痕记忆评价量表(SCAR)和数字评定量表(NRS)进行美容评价。
    结果:在PSM年龄之后,病变深度,病变的大小,和手术部位,对72例患者(ERS=24,ORS=48)进行分析。接受ERS的患者手术时间更长(164.25±18.46vs.112.85±14.26分钟;P<0.001),估计失血较少(5.42±2.15vs.18.04±1.62ml;P<0.001),住院时间中位数较短(4.50[3.00-5.00]vs.6.00[5.00-6.00]天;P<0.001)。随访时间ERS组为8.04±1.23个月,ORS组为8.56±1.57个月。对于美学结果,ERS的总体SCAR评分中位数低于ORS(2[1-3]vs.5[4-5];P<0.001),和“疤痕扩散”的分量表,“\”色素沉着,“\”轨迹标记或缝合标记,“”和“总体印象”更好。NRS评分中位数较高(8[7-8]vs.6[5-6];P<0.001),疤痕长度较短(2.18±0.30vs.ERS组8.75±1.98cm;P<0.001)高于ORS组。两组总并发症发生率及复发率比较差异无统计学意义。
    结论:内镜手术是一种安全有效的选择,适用于四肢和躯干的小儿VA。它提供了改善美学结果和减少术后伤口愈合时间的优点。
    BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection has been reported for vascular anomalies (VA) previously. However, there is no study comparing endoscopic resection surgery (ERS) with open resection surgery (ORS) in children. We aimed to compare clinical and cosmetic outcomes between two approaches in pediatric VA.
    METHODS: Between June 2018 and June 2023, 138 pediatric VA patients undergoing ERS or ORS were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias. The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale and numerical rating scale (NRS) based on patient satisfaction were used for cosmetic assessment.
    RESULTS: After PSM for age, depth of lesion, size of lesion, and site of surgery, 72 patients (ERS = 24, ORS = 48) were analyzed. Patients undergoing ERS had longer operative time (164.25 ± 18.46 vs. 112.85 ± 14.26 min; P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (5.42 ± 2.15 vs. 18.04 ± 1.62 ml; P < 0.001), and shorter median hospital stay (4.50 [3.00-5.00] vs. 6.00 [5.00-6.00] days; P < 0.001). The follow-up time was 8.04 ± 1.23 month for ERS group and 8.56 ± 1.57 month for ORS group. For aesthetic results, the median overall SCAR score in ERS was lower than that in ORS (2 [1-3] vs. 5 [4-5]; P < 0.001), and the subscales of \"scar spread,\" \"dyspigmentation,\" \"track marks or suture marks,\" and \"overall impression\" were better. The median NRS score was higher (8 [7-8] vs. 6 [5-6]; P < 0.001) and length of scars was shorter (2.18 ± 0.30 vs. 8.75 ± 1.98 cm; P < 0.001) in ERS group than those in ORS group. The incidences of total complications and recurrence showed no significant difference between two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic surgery can be a safe and effective option for pediatric VA in the limbs and trunk. It offers the advantages of improving aesthetic outcomes and reducing postoperative wound healing time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于缺乏大样本的循证医学研究,直肠神经内分泌肿瘤根治术的手术方式仍存在争议.
    方法:我们回顾性收集了2010年1月1日至2022年4月30日在中国17家大型三级医院接受根治性切除术的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤患者的病历。将所有患者分为腹腔镜组和开腹手术组。在倾向得分匹配以减少混杂因素之后,比较了两组的术后和肿瘤结局.
    结果:我们招募了174例接受根治性手术的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤患者。随机匹配后,124例患者归入对比(62例,腹腔镜手术组;62例,开腹手术组)。腹腔镜手术组并发症较少(14.5%vs.35.5%,P=0.007)和优越的无复发生存率(P=0.048)。亚组分析显示,腹腔镜手术组并发症较少(10.9%vs.34.7%,P=0.004),术后住院时间较短(9.56±5.21天vs.12.31±8.61天,P=0.049)和直肠神经内分泌肿瘤≤4cm亚组的无复发生存率(P=0.025)。
    结论:腹腔镜手术治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤≤4cm患者,可改善术后预后,可作为一种安全可行的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤根治术选择。
    BACKGROUND: Owing to the lack of evidence-based medical studies with large sample sizes, the surgical approach for the radical resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors remains controversial.
    METHODS: We retrospectively collected the medical records of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical resection at 17 large tertiary care hospitals in China between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2022. All patients were divided into laparoscopic and open surgery groups. After propensity score matching to reduce confounders, the postoperative and oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups.
    RESULTS: We enrolled 174 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical surgery. After random matching, 124 patients were included in the comparison (62, laparoscopic surgery group; 62, open surgery group). The laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (14.5% vs. 35.5%, P = 0.007) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.048). Subgroup analysis revealed that the laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (10.9% vs. 34.7%, P = 0.004), shorter postoperative hospital stays (9.56 ± 5.21 days vs. 12.31 ± 8.61 days, P = 0.049) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.025) in the rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm subgroup.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery was associated with improved postoperative outcomes and oncologic prognosis for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm; it can serve as a safe and feasible option for radical surgery of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    下腔静脉滤器通常使用血管内手术取回。然而,在出现与过滤器相关的并发症或血管内修复变得具有挑战性的情况下,可以考虑开放手术。
    一名65岁的女性因进行性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)接受了下腔静脉滤器置入手术。两个月后,在外部医院进行了一次失败的血管内取回尝试,她经历了腹痛,并被转移到我们的设施进行进一步治疗。检查显示,她遇到了并发症,下腔静脉过滤器在植入后同时穿透了腔静脉和十二指肠。但幸运的是,患者的血液检查结果在正常范围内。最终,我们的机构通过开放手术成功移除过滤器,患者出院,没有任何并发症。
    这种情况下,随着我们的文献综述,说明了通过开放手术去除十二指肠穿透过滤器的可行性和安全性,为患者带来有利的结果和有希望的预后。
    UNASSIGNED: Inferior vena cava filters are typically retrieved using endovascular procedures. However, in cases where complications related to the filter arise or when endovascular retrieval becomes challenging, open surgery could be considered.
    UNASSIGNED: A 65-year-old woman underwent inferior vena cava filter placement surgery for progressive venous thrombosis embolism (VTE). Following an unsuccessful endovascular retrieval attempt at an external hospital two months later, she experienced abdominal pain and was transferred to our facility for further treatment. Examination revealed that she was encountered a complication where the inferior vena cava filter penetrated both the vena cava and the duodenum post-implantation. But fortunately, the patient\'s blood test results were within normal range. Ultimately, our institution successfully removed the filter through open surgery and the patient was discharged without any complications.
    UNASSIGNED: This case, along with our literature review, illustrates the viability and safety of duodenal-penetrated filter removal via open surgery, resulting in favorable outcomes and a promising prognosis for the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨腹腔镜手术在老年(≥75岁)结直肠癌患者中的应用价值。并确定影响该人口统计学长期生存的预后因素,并建立预测列线图模型。
    方法:回顾性分析宝鸡市人民医院2016年8月至2018年2月146例老年(≥75岁)结直肠癌根治术患者的临床资料,其中开腹手术55例,腹腔镜手术91例。使用Kaplan-Meier方法绘制生存曲线,使用Log-rank检验评估预后差异。使用Cox比例风险模型分析了各种因素对5年生存率的预后影响。在Cox模型中确定的重要预测因子用于构建预测生存的列线图,然后验证准确性和临床实用性。
    结果:腹腔镜手术可缩短住院时间(P=0.022)。虽然成本较高(P=0.011)。腹腔镜组术中出血较少(P<0.001),切口长度(P<0.001),术后首次排痰时间(P<0.001),术后第一次进食时间(P=0.002),术后腹腔引流时间与开放手术组比较(P=0.003)。此外,腹腔镜组术后伤口并发症的发生率也较低(P=0.014).两组治疗后5年生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.150)。多因素Cox回归分析显示有糖尿病史(P=0.037),血管浸润(P=0.026),神经束侵犯(P=0.001),TNM分期(P=0.001)是影响晚期结直肠癌患者5年生存率的独立预后因素。构建的列线图对1-,3-,5年生存率,AUC值分别为0.91、0.87和0.79。校准曲线和决策曲线分析证实了模型的临床实用性。风险公式:糖尿病病史*-0.696194503+血管浸润*-0.769736513+神经束侵犯*-1.1709777+TNM分期*1.201933691。
    结论:与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术可以减少老年(≥75岁)结直肠癌患者的术中创伤,加速术后恢复。建立的列线图模型基于独立的预后因素,如糖尿病史,血管浸润,神经束侵入,和TNM分期,促进量身定制的预后评估,加强患者个人管理。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application value of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with colorectal cancer, and to identify the prognostic factors influencing the long-term survival in this demographic, and to establish a predictive nomogram model.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 146 elderly (≥ 75 years old) colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery in Baoji People\'s Hospital from August 2016 to February 2018, including 55 patients who underwent laparotomy and 91 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in prognosis were assessed using the Log-rank test. Prognostic impacts of various factors on 5-year survival were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Significant predictors identified in the Cox model were used to construct a nomogram for predicting survival, which was then validated for accuracy and clinical utility.
    RESULTS: Laparoscopic surgery was associated with shorter hospital stays (P = 0.022), although at a higher cost (P = 0.011). The laparoscopic group also had less intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001), incision length (P < 0.001), time to first postoperative expectoration (P < 0.001), time to first postoperative feeding (P = 0.002), and time to postoperative peritoneal drainage (P = 0.003) compared to the open surgery group. Additionally, the rate of postoperative wound complications was also lower in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in the 5-year post-treatment survival between the two groups (P = 0.150). Multifactorial Cox regression analysis revealed that a history of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.037), vascular infiltration (P = 0.026), nerve bundle invasion (P = 0.001), and TNM stage (P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors affecting the 5-year survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The constructed nomogram showed high predictive accuracy for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, with AUC values of 0.91, 0.87, and 0.79, respectively. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis confirmed the model\'s clinical utility. Risk formula: History of diabetes mellitus * -0.696194503 + Vascular infiltration * -0.769736513 + Nerve bundle invasion * -1.1709777 + TNM staging * 1.201933691.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery can reduce intraoperative trauma and accelerate postoperative recovery in elderly colorectal cancer patients (≥ 75 years) compared to open surgery. The developed nomogram model based on independent prognostic factors such as diabetes history, vascular infiltration, nerve bundle invasion, and TNM staging, facilitates tailored prognostic assessment, enhancing individual patient management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管并发症是肾移植术后严重的手术并发症之一,如果治疗不当,可能会影响移植结果,甚至危及生命。我们对1月之间完成的2,304例肾移植手术进行了回顾性分析,2015年1月,2022年,共有1658名男性患者和646名女性患者。在上述情况中,肾移植术后有54例血管并发症,我们研究中血管并发症的发生率为2.34%(54/2,304),最常见的血管并发症是移植肾动脉狭窄(TRAS,n=36),其次是髂外动脉夹层(n=5),肾动脉破裂(n=4),肾静脉血栓形成(n=3),肾动脉血栓形成(n=2),肾动脉夹层(n=1),肾动脉假性动脉瘤(n=1),髂内动脉假性动脉瘤(n=1),和肾动脉扭结(n=1)。40例患者行经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA),包括3个球囊导管扩张和37个血管内支架,14人接受了开放手术。最终,9例患者进行了移植肾切除术,总体治疗率为81.5%。PTA可以令人满意地治疗大多数血管并发症。然而,肾动脉破裂的整体治疗,血栓形成,肾动脉扭结,其他并发症很差,移植肾损失率高。
    Vascular complications after renal transplantation are one of the serious surgical complications, which can affect the transplantation outcome and even endanger life if not treated properly. We performed a retrospective analysis of the 2,304 renal transplantations procedures completed between the period of Jan., 2015 and Jan., 2022, which consisted of 1,658 male patients and 646 female patients. Among the above cases, there were 54 cases of vascular complications after renal transplantation, the incidence of vascular complications in our study was 2.34% (54/2,304), the most common vascular complication was transplanted renal artery stenosis (TRAS, n = 36), followed by external iliac artery dissection (n = 5), renal artery rupture (n = 4), renal vein thrombosis (n = 3), renal artery thrombosis (n = 2), renal artery dissection (n = 1), renal artery pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), and internal iliac artery pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), and renal artery kinking (n = 1). 40 patients were treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), including 3 balloon catheter dilatation and 37 endovascular stentings, and 14 underwent open surgery. Eventually, 9 patients had graft nephrectomy, resulting in an overall treatment rate of 81.5%. Most vascular complications can be treated satisfactorily with PTA. However, the overall treatment of renal artery rupture, thrombosis, renal artery kinking, and other complications is poor, and the rate of transplanted renal loss is high.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:腹腔镜手术已得到结肠癌临床指南的认可,但不适用于直肠癌,原因是未经批准的肿瘤学与开放手术相当。
    目的:我们开始了这项迄今为止最大的荟萃分析,以全面评估腹腔镜与开腹手术相比在直肠癌治疗中的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在PubMed中搜索了1990年1月至2020年3月之间比较腹腔镜直肠切除术和开腹手术的随机和非随机对照试验,Cochrane图书馆和Embase数据库(PROSPERO注册号CRD42020211718)。术中的数据,病态,比较两组患者术后和生存结果.
    结果:20个RCT和93个NRCT,包括216,615名患者符合纳入标准,其中48,888例患者接受腹腔镜手术,167,727例患者接受开腹手术.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术组恢复较快,30天内并发症少,死亡率降低。腹腔镜手术组环周切缘(RR=0.79,95%CI:0.72~0.85,p<0.0001)和远切缘(RR=0.75,95%CI:0.66~0.85p<0.0001)阳性率显著降低,但全直肠系膜切除的完整性无显著差异。3年和5年局部复发,腹腔镜手术组的无病生存率和总生存率均有所提高,而两种方法之间的远端复发没有显着差异。
    结论:在肿瘤学结果和长期生存率方面,腹腔镜检查在直肠癌治疗中不劣于开腹手术。此外,腹腔镜手术提供了短期优势,包括更快的恢复和更少的并发症。
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has been endorsed by clinical guidelines for colon cancer, but not for rectal cancer on account of unapproved oncologic equivalence with open surgery.
    OBJECTIVE: We started this largest-to-date meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal cancer compared with open surgery.
    METHODS: Both randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic proctectomy and open surgery between January 1990 and March 2020 were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase Databases (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020211718). The data of intraoperative, pathological, postoperative and survival outcomes were compared between two groups.
    RESULTS: Twenty RCTs and 93 NRCTs including 216,615 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with 48,888 patients received laparoscopic surgery and 167,727 patients underwent open surgery. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery group showed faster recovery, less complications and decreased mortality within 30 days. The positive rate of circumferential margin (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.85, p < 0.0001) and distal margin (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.85 p < 0.0001) was significantly reduced in the laparoscopic surgery group, but the completeness of total mesorectal excision showed no significant difference. The 3-year and 5-year local recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival were all improved in the laparoscopic surgery group, while the distal recurrence did not differ significantly between the two approaches.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer with respect to oncological outcomes and long-term survival. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery provides short-term advantages, including faster recovery and less complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对腹腔镜胆囊癌(GBC)根治术的安全性的担忧仍然存在。这项系统评价和荟萃分析试图比较腹腔镜手术(LS)与开腹手术(OS)治疗GBC的安全性和有效性。
    PubMed,EMBASE,和WebofScience从成立到2022年7月18日进行了搜索。文献检索,质量评估,和数据提取独立完成,一式两份。在随机效应模型下得出以加权平均差(WMD)或比值比(OR)表示的效应大小估计值,置信区间为95%(CI)。
    对包括2,868名参与者在内的27项独立研究进行了荟萃分析。术中失血量有显著性意义(WMD:-117.194,95%CI:-170.188至64.201,P<0.001),收集的淋巴结(WMD:-1.023,95%CI:-1.776至-0.269,P=0.008),术后住院时间(WMD:-3.555,95%CI:-4.509至-2.601,P<0.001),术后发病率(OR:0.596,95%CI:0.407~0.871,P=0.008),2年总生存率(OR:1.524,95%CI:1.143至2.031,P=0.004),T2生存率在1年(OR:1.799,95%CI:1.777至2.749,P<0.01)和2年(OR:2.026,95%CI:1.392至2.949,P<0.001),以及1年(OR:2.669,95%CI:1.564至4.555,P<0.001)和2年(OR:2.300,95%CI:1.308至4.046,P=0.004)的T3生存率。亚组分析显示,种族,附带GBC,样本量,和随访期是异质性的可能来源。除术后发病率外,所有结局的发表偏倚概率较低。
    我们的研究结果表明,从统计学上讲,LS具有更好的2年生存率,术中出血少,住院时间缩短,并发症发生率低于OS。然而,由于附带GBC的影响,LS的优越性甚至安全性仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,下落不明的异质性,出版偏见,淋巴结清扫术,和端口部位转移。
    UNASSIGNED: Concerns over the security of laparoscopic radical operation for gallbladder cancer (GBC) persist. This systematic review and meta-analysis attempted to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus open surgery (OS) in the treatment of GBC.
    UNASSIGNED: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 18, 2022. Literature search, quality assessment, and data extraction were completed independently and in duplicate. Effect-size estimates expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were derived under the random-effects model.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 27 independent studies including 2,868 participants were meta-analyzed. Significance was noted for intraoperative blood loss (WMD: -117.194, 95% CI: -170.188 to 64.201, P<0.001), harvested lymph nodes (WMD: -1.023, 95% CI: -1.776 to -0.269, P=0.008), postoperative hospital stay (WMD: -3.555, 95% CI: -4.509 to -2.601, P<0.001), postoperative morbidity (OR: 0.596, 95% CI: 0.407 to 0.871, P=0.008), overall survival rate at 2-year (OR: 1.524, 95% CI: 1.143 to 2.031, P=0.004), T2 survival at 1-year (OR: 1.799, 95% CI: 1.777 to 2.749, P<0.01) and 2-year (OR: 2.026, 95% CI: 1.392 to 2.949, P<0.001), as well as T3 survival at 1-year (OR: 2.669, 95% CI: 1.564 to 4.555, P<0.001) and 2-year (OR: 2.300, 95% CI: 1.308 to 4.046, P=0.004). Subgroup analyses revealed that ethnicity, incidental GBC, sample size, and follow-up period were possible sources of heterogeneity. There was a low probability of publication bias for all outcomes except postoperative morbidity.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings indicated that LS statistically had better 2-year survival rates, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospitalization times, and lower rates of complications than OS. However, the superiority and even the safety of LS still remain an open question due to the impact of incidental GBC, unaccounted heterogeneity, publication bias, lymph node dissection, and port-site metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是描述在介入治疗时代开放手术治疗基底动脉动脉瘤的有效性和评估,包括手术夹闭和血液重建,回顾性分析本中心基底动脉动脉瘤的临床资料。
    方法:根据纳入和排除标准,回顾性纳入在我们中心接受治疗的基底动脉动脉瘤患者。基本临床资料,手术方法,对入选患者的临床随访情况和预后进行详细分析.在这项研究中,mRS评分用于评估患者的神经系统预后,用SPSS对相关数据进行统计学分析。
    结果:本研究纳入了2010年1月至2023年8月在我们中心接受治疗的104名合格患者,其中67例通过开放手术治疗,37例通过旁路手术治疗。对于67例开放性手术夹闭患者,平均年龄为60.0(52.0,65.0)岁.动脉瘤的最大直径范围为2.0mm至54.0mm,平均值为13.9(10.0,19.0)mm。平均随访时间38(20,58)个月。在最后一次随访中,发现61个(91.0%)完全闭塞的动脉瘤和6个(9.0%)不完全闭塞的动脉瘤。59例(88.1%)患者预后良好,8例(11.9%)患者预后差。手术夹闭后,术后动脉瘤完全消除和不完全消除在预后良好组和预后不良组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001).对于37名搭桥组患者,平均年龄为52.0(45.5,59.0)岁.动脉瘤的最大直径范围为10.5mm至55.0mm,平均值为28.55±12.08mm。18例(48.6%)患者行搭桥联合近端闭塞术,19例(51.4%)患者仅进行了旁路手术.临床随访19.0(10.5、43.0)个月。有19例(51.4%)患者完全消除了动脉瘤,13(35.1%),动脉瘤消除不完全,5(13.5%)动脉瘤稳定。32例(86.5%)患者预后良好,5例(13.5%)患者预后较差。
    结论:基底动脉动脉瘤的治疗具有挑战性。在快速发展的介入治疗时代的背景下,对于不适合介入的复杂基底动脉动脉瘤,包括手术夹闭和搭桥是理想的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the effectiveness and evaluation of open surgical treatment of basilar artery aneurysms in the context of interventional therapy era, including surgical clipping and blood reconstruction, by retrospectively analyzing the clinical data of basilar artery aneurysms in our center.
    METHODS: Patients with basilar artery aneurysms who were treated at our center were retrospectively included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The basic clinical data, surgical approach, clinical follow-up and prognosis of the enrolled patients were analyzed in detail. In this study, the mRS score was applied to assess the neurological prognosis of the patients, and the relevant data were statistically analyzed using SPSS.
    RESULTS: A total of 104 eligible patients treated at our center from January 2010 to August 2023 were included in this study, of which 67 were treated by open surgery and 37 by bypass. For the 67 patients with open surgical clipping, the mean age was 60.0 (52.0, 65.0) years. The maximum diameter of the aneurysms ranged from 2.0 mm to 54.0 mm, with a mean of 13.9 (10.0, 19.0) mm. The mean follow-up time was 38 (20, 58) months. At the last follow-up, 61 (91.0%) completely obliterated aneurysms and 6 (9.0%) incompletely obliterated aneurysms were found. The prognosis was good in 59 (88.1%) patients and poor in 8 (11.9%). After surgical clipping, the difference between complete and incomplete postoperative aneurysm elimination was statistically significant between the favorable and poor prognosis groups (P < 0.001). For the 37 bypass group patients, the mean age was 52.0 (45.5, 59.0) years. The maximum diameter of the aneurysm ranged from 10.5 mm to 55.0 mm, with a mean of 28.55 ± 12.08 mm. Bypass combined with proximal occlusion was performed in 18 (48.6%) patients, and bypass only was performed in 19 (51.4%) patients. Clinical follow-up was 19.0 (10.5, 43.0) months. There were 19 (51.4%) patients with complete elimination of the aneurysm, 13 (35.1%) with incomplete elimination of the aneurysm, and 5 (13.5%) with aneurysm stabilization. The prognosis was good in 32 (86.5%) patients and poor in 5 (13.5%) patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of basilar artery aneurysms is challenging. In the context of the rapidly evolving interventional therapy era, open surgery including surgical clipping and bypass is an ideal option for complex basilar artery aneurysms not amenable to intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    开胸手术已成为支气管囊肿(BC)患者的传统手术方法。本研究旨在评估视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)与开放式手术治疗成人BCs的安全性和有效性。
    这个单一机构,回顾性队列研究纳入了在2019年2月至2023年1月期间接受VATS(A组)或开放手术(B组)的117例接受BC切除术的连续成年患者.有关临床病史的数据,操作持续时间,住院时间,30天死亡率,收集并分析随访期间的复发情况。
    在总队列中,103例(88.0%)患者接受VATS,14例(12.0%)患者接受了开放手术。B组患者年龄明显大于A组(P=0.014),两组间其他人口统计学和基线临床特征无显著差异.VATS组的中位手术时间较短(96vs.149.5分钟,P<0.001)和较短的平均住院时间(5.0±5.5vs.8.6±4.0天,P<0.001)。开放手术组1例死亡。在中位随访34次(四分位距,20.8-42.5)个月,两组均未出现BC复发.
    与开放手术相比,VATS也是治疗成人BCs的安全有效方法。更重要的是,VATS提供了更短的手术时间和住院时间。考虑到微创,VATS可能是大多数支气管囊肿患者的更好选择。
    UNASSIGNED: Open thoracotomy has been the traditional surgical approach for patients with bronchogenic cysts (BCs). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) compared to open surgery for the treatment of BCs in adults.
    UNASSIGNED: This single-institution, retrospective cohort study included 117 consecutive adult patients who underwent VATS (group A) or open surgery (group B) for BC resection between February 2019 and January 2023. Data regarding clinical history, operation duration, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, and recurrence during follow-up were collected and analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the total cohort, 103 (88.0%) patients underwent VATS, while 14 (12.0%) patients underwent open surgery. Patients\' age in group B were much older than group A (P=0.014), and no significant differences in other demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were observed between the groups. The VATS group had shorter median operation duration (96 vs. 149.5 min, P<0.001) and shorter mean length of hospital stay (5.0±5.5 vs. 8.6±4.0 days, P<0.001). One death occurred in the open surgery group. During a median follow-up of 34 (interquartile range, 20.8-42.5) months, no instances of BC recurrence were observed in either group.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to open surgery, VATS is also a safe and efficacious approach for treating BCs in adults. What\'s more, VATS offered shorter operative times and hospital stays. Considering the minimally invasive, VATS may be a better choice in most patients with bronchial cysts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:因为案件很少,我们旨在回顾异物撞击通过食道穿透颈部的病例,以分析这些病例的特征。外科医生的开放式手术技巧,分析了罕见疾病的治疗过程和外科医生的经验。
    方法:收集我院2015-2020年所有病例并进行分析。回顾了禁食和抗感染治疗的手术技巧和程序。后续是电话沟通。
    结果:我们的系列包括15例。宫颈前部位的压痛是筛查的物理体征。13例患者行颈部外侧开放手术,切口包括颈部左侧,仅2例是从颈部右侧切开。在一个病例中,嵌塞3天后发现了脓液,我们系列中观察到的最短时间。在所有15例中,仅有5例(33.33%)的食管裂伤主要缝合。充分排水后(平均超过9天),抗生素治疗和禁食(通常2-3周),在完成全血细胞计数和食管造影结果确认后,患者逐渐开始从液体中转向固体食物。无严重并发症发生,所有患者均无吞咽功能障碍,恢复良好。
    结论:撞击后应尽快进行手术。侧颈入路手术和本文所述的治疗方法是安全有效的治疗方法。
    BACKGROUND: Because the cases are quite scarce, we aimed to review cases of foreign body impaction penetrating the neck through the esophagus to analyze the characteristics of these cases. The open surgery skills of the surgeon, the treatment procedure and the surgeons\' experience in the rare diseases were analyzed.
    METHODS: We collected and analyzed all cases from 2015-2020 in our hospital. Surgical skills and procedures for fasting and anti-infection treatment were reviewed retrospectively. Follow-up was telephone communication.
    RESULTS: Our series included 15 cases. Tenderness in the pre-cervical site was a physical sign for screening. Thirteen cases underwent a lateral neck open surgery with the incision including the left side of neck and only two cases were incised from the right side of the neck. Pus was found 3 days after the impaction in one case, the shortest time observed in our series. The esophageal laceration was only sutured primarily in 5 cases (33.33%) among all fifteen cases. After sufficient drainage (average more than 9 days), antibiotic treatment and fasting (normally 2-3 weeks), patients gradually began to switch to solid foods from fluids after complete blood counts and confirmations from esophageal radiography result. No severe complications occurred, and all the patients have no swallowing dis-function and recovered well.
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgery should be performed as soon as possible after impaction. Lateral neck approach surgery and the therapeutic procedure described in this article are safe and effective treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号