The use of extensively heated (EH) milk and egg products, and dietary advancement therapies such as milk and egg ladders is increasingly common for the management of milk and egg allergies. Although the majority of patients with milk and egg allergies will outgrow their allergies, the ability to tolerate extensively hydrolyzed forms of these allergens is an early indicator of developing long-term tolerance. The denaturation of conformational epitopes during the heating process reduces the allergenicity of these proteins, which makes patients who are EH tolerant more likely to tolerate progressively more of these proteins.

UNASSIGNED: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-immunoglobulin E (IgE) cell mediated food allergy that can cause severe symptoms and is considered an allergic emergency.
UNASSIGNED: To describe FPIES epidemiology and appraise the approach to diagnosis and management.
UNASSIGNED: A review of the relevant articles published in the peer-reviewed journals since the publication of the First International FPIES Consensus Guidelines in 2017.
UNASSIGNED: FPIES is estimated to affect 0.51-0.9% of children and 0.22% of adults in the United States. It typically presents with protracted, projectile vomiting, which occurs within 1-4 hours of ingesting culprit foods, sometimes followed by diarrhea within 24 hours of ingestion. In ∼15-20% of severe cases, patients go into hypovolemic or distributive shock. In chronic FPIES, infants may have failure to thrive and weight loss. The most common triggers include cow\'s milk, oat, rice, and avocado, with egg and peanut being more frequently reported. Examples of other common fruit and vegetable triggers include banana, apple, and sweet potato. FPIES can be classified into acute, chronic, adult-onset, or atypical subtypes. FPIES is associated with comorbid atopic conditions of IgE-mediated food allergy, atopic dermatitis, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eosinophilic esophagitis. The natural history of infantile FPIES is generally favorable, with the exception of fish FPIES. Seafood FPIES in adults has low rates of resolution over 3-5 years. Correctly identifying FPIES can be challenging because there are no specific biomarkers for diagnosis and the constellation of symptoms may mimic those of infectious enteritis or sepsis. Management relies on dietary food avoidance, periodic re-evaluations for tolerance with oral food challenges, and management of acute reactions with rehydration and antiemetic ondansetron. Although the pathophysiology of FPIES remains poorly understood, underlying mechanisms such as cytokine release, leukocyte activation, and impaired gastrointestinal mucosal barrier function may act as cornerstones for further research.
UNASSIGNED: Prevention, laboratory diagnostic testing, and strategies to accelerate tolerance development are urgent unmet needs in FPIES.

UNASSIGNED: Tolerance Induction Program (TIP) immunotherapy applies machine learning contextualized on immunologic and food protein data sets. TIP has established efficacy toward peanut allergy. This form of treatment demonstrates equal efficacy toward cow\'s milk anaphylaxis. TIP maintains remission outcomes defined as a minimum of 7 days of allergen unresponsiveness to high-dose protein exposures. Furthermore, remission patients openly consume unrestricted amounts of dairy protein.
UNASSIGNED: We sought to assess the rate of decline in specific IgE specific whole and component-resolved diagnostics following 1 year of TIP milk immunotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: The study comprised 214 cow milk anaphylactic children who underwent TIP at the Translational Pulmonary & Immunology Research Center/Food Allergy Institute. Postintervention changes in cow milk specific IgE, component-resolved diagnostics, and specific IgG4 were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: After 1 year of 10-g dairy protein weekly sustained unresponsiveness, eosinophil count decreased from 558.38 to 409.26 cells/μL, the mean cow milk IgE decreased from 16.91 to 9.10 kU/L, the mean boiled cow milk IgE decreased from 12.89 to 6.03 kU/L, the mean Bos D4 decreased from 7.38 to 3.52 kU/L, the mean Bos D5 decreased from 6.79 to 3.16 kU/L, and the mean Bos D8 decreased from 13.55 to 6.62 kU/L. Adverse events were rare.
UNASSIGNED: TIP cow milk immunotherapy significantly reduced cow milk specific IgE and component-resolved diagnostics while increasing specific IgG4 in cow milk anaphylactic children. TIP demonstrates safety and clinical efficacy in cow milk anaphylaxis treatment.

Milk is a good source of nutrition but is also a source of allergenic proteins such as α-lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin (BLG), casein, and immunoglobulins. The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas technology has the potential to edit any gene, including milk allergens. Previously, CRISPR/Cas has been successfully employed in dairy cows and goats, but buffaloes remain unexplored for any milk trait. In this study, we utilized the CRISPR/Cas9 system to edit the major milk allergen BLG gene in buffaloes. First, the editing efficiency of designed sgRNAs was tested in fibroblast cells using the T7E assay and Sanger sequencing. The most effective sgRNA was selected to generate clonal lines of BLG-edited cells. Analysis of 15 single-cell clones, through TA cloning and Sanger sequencing, revealed that 7 clones exhibited bi-allelic (-/-) heterozygous, bi-allelic (-/-) homozygous, and mono-allelic (-/+) disruptions in BLG. Bioinformatics prediction analysis confirmed that non-multiple-of-3 edited nucleotide cell clones have frame shifts and early truncation of BLG protein, while multiple-of-3 edited nucleotides resulted in slightly disoriented protein structures. Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) method was used to produce blastocyst-stage embryos that have similar developmental rates and quality with wild-type embryos. This study demonstrated the successful bi-allelic editing (-/-) of BLG in buffalo cells through CRISPR/Cas, followed by the production of BLG-edited blastocyst stage embryos using SCNT. With CRISPR and SCNT methods described herein, our long-term goal is to generate gene-edited buffaloes with BLG-free milk.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Cow\'s milk allergy (CMA) is the most common food allergy in infants. The replacement with specialized formulas is an established clinical approach to ensure adequate growth and minimize the risk of severe allergic reactions when breastfeeding is not possible. Still, given the availability of multiple options, such as extensively hydrolyzed cow\'s milk protein formula (eHF-CM), amino acid formula (AAF), hydrolyzed rice formula (HRF) and soy formulas (SF), there is some uncertainty as to the most suitable choice with respect to health outcomes. Furthermore, the addition of probiotics to a formula has been proposed as a potential approach to maximize benefit.
UNASSIGNED: These evidence-based guidelines from the World Allergy Organization (WAO) intend to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about the use of milk specialized formulas, with and without probiotics, for individuals with CMA.
UNASSIGNED: WAO formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to include the views of all stakeholders and to minimize potential biases from competing interests. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to review by stakeholders.
UNASSIGNED: After reviewing the summarized evidence and thoroughly discussing the different management options, the WAO guideline panel suggests: a) using an extensively hydrolyzed (cow\'s milk) formula or a hydrolyzed rice formula as the first option for managing infants with immunoglobulin E (IgE) and non-IgE-mediated CMA who are not being breastfed. An amino-acid formula or a soy formula could be regarded as second and third options respectively; b) using either a formula without a probiotic or a casein-based extensively hydrolyzed formula containing Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) for infants with either IgE or non-IgE-mediated CMA.The issued recommendations are labeled as \"conditional\" following the GRADE approach due to the very low certainty about the health effects based on the available evidence.
UNASSIGNED: If breastfeeding is not available, clinicians, patients, and their family members might want to discuss all the potential desirable and undesirable consequences of each formula in infants with CMA, integrating them with the patients\' and caregivers\' values and preferences, local availability, and cost, before deciding on a treatment option. We also suggest what research is needed to determine with greater certainty which formulas are likely to be the most beneficial, cost-effective, and equitable.

UNASSIGNED: Early supplementation and subsequent discontinuation of cow\'s milk formula (CMF) may increase the risk of cow\'s milk allergy in breast-fed infants, but little is known about the relationship between continuous CMF ingestion and cow\'s milk protein-specific immunoglobulin production.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to clarify the aforesaid relationship in cow\'s milk-sensitized infants.
UNASSIGNED: Using data from a randomized controlled trial of a Japanese birth cohort, we performed a subgroup analysis of participants who had ingested CMF in the first 3 days of life and exhibited a positive skin prick test response to cow\'s milk at age 6 months. We compared the differences in median titers of cow\'s milk-specific IgE, casein-specific IgE, and casein-specific IgG4 levels between participants who continued daily or intermittent CMF ingestion up to age 6 months (the \"continuous group\") and participants who discontinued CMF ingestion before age 6 months (the \"discontinued group\").
UNASSIGNED: From among 462 trial participants, 49 (10.6%) were included in this study (21 in the continuous group and 29 in the discontinued group). The median titer of cow\'s milk-specific IgE was 0.17 kUA/L (interquartile range [IQR] = <0.10 to 0.57) in the continuous group and 0.66 kUA/L (IQR = 0.49-1.18) in the discontinued group (P = .0008). The median titer of casein-specific IgE was <0.10 kUA/L (IQR = <0.10 to 0.15) in the continuous group and <0.10 kUA/L (IQR = <0.10 to 0.37) in the discontinued group (P = .51). The median titer of casein-specific IgG4 was 2.58 mgA/L (IQR = 0.77-6.73) in the continuous group and 0.09 mgA/L (IQR = 0.07-0.13) in the discontinued group (P < .0001).
UNASSIGNED: Continuous CMF ingestion may promote casein-specific IgG4 production in cow\'s milk-sensitized infants.

BACKGROUND: The effect of the amount of transient cow\'s milk formula (CMF) consumed during the first days of life on IgE-cow\'s milk allergy (IgE-CMA) is unknown.
METHODS: A cohort of 58 patients with IgE-CMA was identified from a large scale population-based study of 13,019 infants followed from birth. A group of 116 infants matched for sex and breastfeeding only duration (beyond the nursery period), and another random group of 259 healthy infants were used as controls. Parents were interviewed and the infants\' medical records were searched to assess CMF consumption in the nursery.
RESULTS: While 96% of the mothers of the 174 infants (58 with Cow\'s milk allergy and 116 controls) reported on exclusive breastfeeding during the stay in the nursery, CMF consumption was documented in 96 (55%) of the infants. Of those, most (57; 59%) received one to three feedings, 20 (21%) received four to nine feedings, and 19 (20%) received ≥10 feedings. Fewer formula feeds (1-3) were significantly more common in the allergic group than ≥4 feeds (p = 0.0003) and no feeds at all (p = 0.02) compared to controls (n = 116). Of those exclusively breastfed in the nursery, 13/23 allergic infants (57%) introduced CMF at age 105-194 days (the period with highest-risk for IgE-CMA) compared to 33/98 (34%) from the random control group (n = 259) (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Most infants end up receiving few CMF feeds in the nursery. Transient CMF in the nursery is associated with increased risk of IgE-CMA.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Milk and egg allergies significantly impact the quality of life, particularly in children. In this regard, food oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged as an effective treatment option; however, the occurrence of frequent adverse reactions poses a challenge, necessitating close monitoring during treatment.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the ability of a new mobile/web app called OITcontrol to monitor milk and egg OIT.
METHODS: Patients undergoing milk or egg OIT were recruited and divided into 2 groups: the active group used the OITcontrol app in conjunction with standard written monitoring methods, whereas the control group relied solely on written diaries. Investigators documented hospital doses, hospital reactions, and administered treatments on the website. Patients recorded their daily allergen home-dose intake, home reactions, and administered treatments using the app. The following variables were compared between both groups: number and severity of hospital and reported home reactions, patient\'s adhesion to the OITcontrol app or written diary or both in terms of daily home-dose intake and home reactions recording, and treatment and dose adjustment compliance at home in case of reaction.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients were assigned to be monitored using the OITcontrol app along with additional written methods (active group), while 14 patients relied solely on a written paper diary (control group). A similar distribution was observed in terms of sex, age, basal characteristics, allergen treated in OIT, premedication, and sensitization profile. Active patients reported a comparable number of hospital and home reactions compared with the control group. In terms of recording system usage, 13/16 (81%) active patients used the OITcontrol app, while 10/14 (71%) control patients relied on the written diary. Among active patients, 6/16 (38%) used both methods, and 1 active patient used only written methods. However, control patients recorded home reactions more frequently than active patients (P=.009). Among active patients, the app was the preferred method for recording reactions (59/86, 69%), compared with the written diary (15/86, 17%) or both methods (12/86, 14%; P<.001). Treatment compliance in home-recorded reactions was similar between both groups (P=.15). However, treatment indications after an adverse reaction were more frequently followed (P=.04) in reactions recorded solely in the app (36/59, 61%) than in the written diary (29/71, 41%) or both systems (4/12, 33%). Moreover, compliance with dose adjustments after a moderate-severe reaction in home-recorded reactions was higher in the active group than in the control group (P<.001). Home reactions recorded only in the app (16/19, 84%) were more likely to follow dose adjustments (P<.001) than those recorded in the written diary (3/20, 15%) or using both methods (2/3, 67%).
CONCLUSIONS: The OITcontrol app appears to be a valuable tool for monitoring OIT treatment in children with food allergies. It proves to be a suitable method for recording daily home dose intakes and reactions, and it seems to enhance adherence to treatment indications following an adverse reaction as well as compliance with dose adjustments in home reactions. However, additional studies are necessary to comprehensively grasp the benefits and limitations of using the OITcontrol app in the management of OIT.