forensic psychiatry

法医精神病学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    同意治疗是医学伦理和法律的基石。然而,很少有经验证据可以告知临床医生和政策制定者关于精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)法医患者做出治疗决定的能力,伴随着临床和法律惰性的风险,无声的胁迫,污名化,或错误的改革。
    在这项跨国研究中,我们对SSD法医和非法医患者的治疗相关决策能力进行了评估和比较.奥地利使用了160名法医和139名非法医患者,德国,意大利,波兰,和英格兰。他们同意接受治疗的能力通过麦克阿瑟能力评估工具(MacCAT-T)进行评估。使用多个广义线性回归模型来识别与MacCAT-T评分相关的社会人口统计学和临床变量。
    总共,55名法医(34.4%)和58名非法医患者(41.7%)显示出较高的治疗相关决策能力,定义为得分≥理解最高得分的75%,欣赏和推理,和2表达选择。法医患者在同意接受治疗的能力方面存在差异。在所有社会人口统计学和临床变量中,只有“社会支持”与政策直接相关。
    法医患者的治疗相关决策能力与非法医患者相当。社会接触可能为增强法医和非法医患者的决策自主权做出重大贡献,从而提高精神保健的整体质量和合法性。
    UNASSIGNED: Consent to treatment is a cornerstone of medical ethics and law. Nevertheless, very little empirical evidence is available to inform clinicians and policymakers regarding the capacities of forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) to make decisions about their treatment, with the risk of clinical and legal inertia, silent coercion, stigmatization, or ill-conceived reforms.
    UNASSIGNED: In this multinational study, we assessed and compared with treatment-related decisional capacities in forensic and non-forensic patients with SSD. 160 forensic and 139 non-forensic patients were used in Austria, Germany, Italy, Poland, and England. Their capacity to consent to treatment was assessed by means of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T). Multiple generalized linear regression models were used to identify the socio-demographic and clinical variables associated with MacCAT-T scores.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 55 forensic (34.4%) and 58 non-forensic patients (41.7%) showed high treatment-related decisional capacity, defined as scoring ≥75% of the maximum scores for the understanding, appreciation and reasoning, and 2 for expressing a choice. Forensic patients showed differences in their capacity to consent to treatment across countries. Of all socio-demographic and clinical variables, only \"social support\" was directly relevant to policy.
    UNASSIGNED: Forensic patients have treatment-related decisional capacities comparable with their non-forensic counterparts. Social contacts might provide a substantial contribution towards enhancing the decisional autonomy of both forensic and non-forensic patients, hence improving the overall quality and legitimacy of mental health care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    额颞叶痴呆(FTD)影响大脑的额叶和颞叶,导致人格改变,语言障碍,和行为障碍,包括冲动和抑制。由于FTD的不断发展,在法医评估中评估责任和累犯风险具有挑战性。尽管文献有限,我们介绍了一个45岁的男性,没有法律或病史,由于与额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)的行为变异相关的行为变化而实施犯罪行为。初步评估发现他不负责任,具有不可评估的累犯风险。随后的评估显示,基于临床演变,累犯风险较低。我们将考虑现有文献和瑞士法学来讨论这些发现。
    Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) affects the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain, leading to personality changes, language impairments, and behavioral disturbances, including impulsivity and disinhibition. Assessing responsibility and recidivism risk in forensic evaluations is challenging due to the evolving nature of FTD. Despite limited literature, we present a case of a 45-year-old man with no prior legal or medical history, who committed criminal acts due to behavioral changes linked to the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Initial assessment found him irresponsible, with a non-evaluable risk of recidivism. Subsequent evaluation showed a low recidivism risk based on clinical evolution. We discuss these findings considering existing literature and Swiss jurisprudence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    法医精神病患者接受治疗,以解决他们的暴力和侵略行为,目的是促进他们安全地重新融入社会。平均而言,这些治疗是有效的,但是效果大小的大小往往很小,即使考虑到数字心理健康创新的最新进展。最近的研究表明,可穿戴技术对普通人群的身心健康有积极影响,因此也可能用于法医精神病学,患者和工作人员。可穿戴技术的几个应用和用例充满希望,特别是对于轻度智力障碍或临界智力功能的患者,因为这些设备被认为是用户友好的,并提供连续的日常反馈。
    在当前的随机交叉试验中,我们解决了之前研究的几个局限性,并比较了4种选定可穿戴设备的(连续)可用性和接受度.每个设备由工作人员和患者佩戴一周,总共四个星期。其中两个设备是通用健身追踪器,而其他两种设备使用定制的应用程序,设计用于生物提示和提供对日常压力源和事件的生理反应性的见解。
    我们的研究结果表明可用性存在显著差异,设备之间的验收和连续使用。与使用定制应用程序(Sense-IT和E4仪表板)的两个设备相比,两个健身追踪器(Fitbit和Garmin)的可用性得分最高。结果显示患者和工作人员的结果相似。
    没有一个设备获得的可用性得分可以证明推荐未来使用,考虑到国际标准;这一发现引起了人们对可穿戴技术在法医精神病学背景下的适应和采用的担忧。我们建议,可穿戴技术的游戏化和动机方面的改进可能有助于解决与可穿戴技术相关的几个挑战。
    UNASSIGNED: Forensic psychiatric patients receive treatment to address their violent and aggressive behavior with the aim of facilitating their safe reintegration into society. On average, these treatments are effective, but the magnitude of effect sizes tends to be small, even when considering more recent advancements in digital mental health innovations. Recent research indicates that wearable technology has positive effects on the physical and mental health of the general population, and may thus also be of use in forensic psychiatry, both for patients and staff members. Several applications and use cases of wearable technology hold promise, particularly for patients with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning, as these devices are thought to be user-friendly and provide continuous daily feedback.
    UNASSIGNED: In the current randomized crossover trial, we addressed several limitations from previous research and compared the (continuous) usability and acceptance of four selected wearable devices. Each device was worn for one week by staff members and patients, amounting to a total of four weeks. Two of the devices were general purpose fitness trackers, while the other two devices used custom made applications designed for bio-cueing and for providing insights into physiological reactivity to daily stressors and events.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings indicated significant differences in usability, acceptance and continuous use between devices. The highest usability scores were obtained for the two fitness trackers (Fitbit and Garmin) compared to the two devices employing custom made applications (Sense-IT and E4 dashboard). The results showed similar outcomes for patients and staff members.
    UNASSIGNED: None of the devices obtained usability scores that would justify recommendation for future use considering international standards; a finding that raises concerns about the adaptation and uptake of wearable technology in the context of forensic psychiatry. We suggest that improvements in gamification and motivational aspects of wearable technology might be helpful to tackle several challenges related to wearable technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的国际研究调查患者自杀对心理健康专业人员的影响。失去病人自杀的经历会有很大的意义,在某些情况下,对心理健康专业人员的长期(负面)影响。然而,对监狱工作人员或法医心理健康专业人员的影响的性质和程度并不清楚。这篇叙述性综述总结了定量和定性研究以及该领域的主要发现,专注于上述职业。使用PsychInfo和GoogleScholar进行了文献检索,从2000年开始。绝大多数研究结果与精神卫生专业人员有关。我们无法确定任何已发表的有关法医精神病工作人员回应的报告。监狱背景下的大多数确定的研究都是定性的。来自德语国家的研究在监狱和心理健康方面都特别稀缺。我们得出的结论是,对于客户/患者自杀对(德国)监狱和法医精神病工作人员亚组的影响,人们非常缺乏了解。显然,需要对影响的性质和程度进行更多的研究,以及有助于减轻自杀负面影响的具体组织和支持因素。
    There is a growing body of international research investigating the impact of patient suicide on mental health professionals. The experience of losing a patient to suicide can have a significant and, in some cases, long-lasting (negative) impact on mental health professionals. However, the nature and extent of the impact on prison staff or forensic mental health professionals in particular is less clear. This narrative review summarises both quantitative and qualitative studies and key findings in this area, focusing on the above professions. A literature search was conducted using PsychInfo and Google Scholar, covering the period from 2000 onwards. The vast majority of findings relate to mental health professionals in general. We were unable to identify any published reports on the responses of forensic psychiatric staff. The majority of identified studies in the prison context are qualitative. Studies from German-speaking countries are particularly scarce in both the prison and mental health contexts. We conclude that there is a profound lack of knowledge about the impact of client/patient suicide on the subgroups of (German) prison and forensic psychiatric staff. Clearly, more research is needed on both the nature and extent of the impact, as well as on the specific organisational and supportive factors that help to mitigate the negative effects of suicide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有证据表明,有一小部分患有精神分裂症谱系障碍的人比普通人群更有可能犯下凶杀罪。然而,关于导致这个群体凶杀的精神病理学的知识有限。这项研究的目的是研究威胁/控制覆盖(TCO)概念的两个常用定义,其目的是识别精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的严重暴力风险。
    这是基于文件的子分析,回顾性和探索性横断面研究。根据两个常用的定义,截至2014年12月31日在柏林法医医院拘留的所有精神分裂症谱系障碍的法医杀人犯都接受了TCO的检查。
    在总共419名精神分裂症谱系障碍的法医患者中,78人被杀(18.6%)。患有精神分裂症谱系障碍的法医杀人犯的特征是男性,失业,单身,犯了(企图)过失杀人罪。不考虑使用的定义,整个TCO复合物存在于不到三分之一的样品中。在这两个定义中,威胁症状的频率略低于Control-Override症状。而Stompe等人的威胁症状发生频率较低。\的定义,控制-克服症状是最常见的。关于Kröber对威胁和控制覆盖的定义,情况恰恰相反。
    关于整个TCO综合体,Kröber的定义似乎更加开放,Stompe等人。更严格(38.5%vs.35.9%)。由于TCO只发生在两个定义中大约三分之一的主题中,这两个定义似乎都不是决定性的。两种定义的比例组合可能有助于未来的TCO定义。本研究提供了几乎没有发表的有关精神分裂症谱系障碍的杀人犯的精神病理学的主要数据。特别是关于两个定义中讨论很多的TCO概念。为了确定最有用的TCO定义,为了避免假阳性,并确定明确的精神病理学风险症状,将来应该对罪犯和非罪犯进行更大的样本和比较研究。
    UNASSIGNED: There is evidence that there is a small group of people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who are more likely to commit homicide than those in the general population. However, there is limited knowledge about the psychopathology that leads to homicide in this group. The aim of this study was to examine two commonly used definitions of the Threat/Control-Override (TCO) concept, which aims to identify a certain risk of serious violence in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a sub analysis of a file-based, retrospective and exploratory cross-sectional study. All forensic homicide offenders with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who were detained at the Forensic Hospital Berlin as of 31 December 2014 were examined for the occurrence of TCO according to two commonly used definitions.
    UNASSIGNED: Of a total of 419 forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, 78 committed homicide (18.6%). The forensic homicide offenders with schizophrenia spectrum disorders were characterised by being male, unemployed, single and having committed (attempted) manslaughter. Irrespective of the definition used, the entire TCO complex was present in less than a third of the sample. In both definitions, Threat symptoms were slightly less frequent than Control-Override symptoms. While Threat symptoms occurred less frequently in Stompe et al.\'s definition, Control-Override symptoms were the most common. With regard to Kröber\'s definition of Threat and Control-Override, the situation is exactly the opposite.
    UNASSIGNED: Regarding the entire TCO complex, Kröber\'s definition seems a little more open and Stompe et al.\'s more strict (38.5% vs. 35.9%). Since TCO only occurs in about one third of the subjects in both definitions, neither definition appears to be conclusive. A combination with proportions from both definitions could be a contribution to a future definition of TCO. The present study provides scarcely published primary data on psychopathology in homicide offenders with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, especially on the much discussed TCO concept in two definitions. In order to determine the most useful definition of TCO, to avoid false positives and to identify clear psychopathological risk symptoms, larger samples and comparative studies with offenders and non-offenders should be conducted in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注意缺陷/多动症(ADHD)在犯罪者中很普遍,增加攻击性和违法行为的风险。由于多动症及其症状可以持续到成年,准确诊断和维持罪犯的诊断对于确保适当治疗和减少累犯至关重要。
    这项研究采用了回顾性纵向设计,以调查2008年至2021年在瑞士法医门诊期间在儿童或青春期确诊为ADHD的成年罪犯中的ADHD。审查了N=181份患者档案,包括法医专家证人评估和治疗报告。我们绘制了确诊为儿童/青春期ADHD诊断的患者的成年轨迹,检查他们的诊断过程。
    181名患者,有证据表明,12例(7%)在儿童/青春期诊断为ADHD.在这12例病例中,有1例(8%)该诊断在整个观察期间得到维持.对于4名患者(33%),在成年后的第一次法医精神病学专家证人评估中给出了诊断,但随后下降。在另外4例(33%)中,诊断在成年后被放弃,但后来被重新分配,而在3例(25%)中,在整个观察期间停止诊断.在50%的诊断改变的病例中,成人ADHD诊断的终止与新诊断的人格障碍同时发生(反之亦然).
    我们的研究结果强调了在成人ADHD诊断中犯罪者的分配存在相当大的不一致。虽然成年后发生ADHD缓解,我们结果中的诊断变异性值得详细审查.一种可能性是多动症与抑郁症等疾病有类似的波动,正如其他地方所争论的那样。同样,诊断可能会变成“丢失”,这意味着即使适用,也不会给出它们,并由其他诊断代替。此外,残留症状可能仍然存在,但超过诊断阈值.这很重要,因为未经治疗的ADHD会增加再犯罪风险和不良健康结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is prevalent amongst offenders, increasing risks for aggressive and delinquent behaviors. Since ADHD and its symptoms can persist into adulthood, accurately diagnosing and maintaining diagnoses in offenders is crucial to ensure appropriate treatment and reduce recidivism.
    UNASSIGNED: This study employed a retrospective longitudinal design to investigate ADHD amongst adult offenders with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD during childhood or adolescence at a Swiss forensic outpatient clinic between 2008 and 2021. N = 181 patient files were reviewed, including forensic expert witness assessments and treatment reports. We charted the adulthood trajectory of patients with a confirmed childhood/adolescence ADHD diagnosis, examining the course of their diagnoses.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 181 patients, evidence indicated that 12 (7%) had an ADHD diagnosis in childhood/adolescence. In 1 (8%) of these 12 cases, the diagnosis was maintained throughout the observation period. For 4 patients (33%), a diagnosis was given in the first forensic psychiatric expert witness assessment in adulthood but subsequently dropped. In another 4 cases (33%), the diagnosis was dropped in adulthood but later re-assigned, whereas in 3 cases (25%), the diagnosis was discontinued throughout the observation period. In 50% of cases with a diagnostic change, the discontinuation of an adult ADHD diagnosis coincided with a newly diagnosed personality disorder (or vice versa).
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings highlighted considerable inconsistencies in the assignment of adult ADHD diagnoses amongst offenders. Whilst ADHD remission in adulthood occurs, the diagnostic variability in our results warrants detailed scrutiny. One possibility is that ADHD has similar fluctuations to conditions like depression, as argued elsewhere. Equally, diagnoses may become \"lost\", meaning they are not given even when applicable and replaced by other diagnoses. Additionally, residual symptoms may remain but beyond the diagnostic threshold. This is significant because untreated ADHD can increase re-offending risks and adverse health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在一般临床精神病实践中,开放性问题比封闭式问题更受欢迎,因为它们被认为在治疗上更有效,并且不太可能使患者迎合我们。然而,在法医精神病学检查中,疑犯可能企图装模作样.
    使用基于强制选择技术的简单检查,作者证明,假装患有智力发育障碍的盗窃嫌疑人的智力水平并没有那么低。提交人准备了两套,每套都有几枚硬币,并要求嫌疑人选择哪一套总价值较高。嫌疑人在多次审判中受到反复讯问。在10多次试验中,他总是选择错误的一组。
    如果嫌疑人真的不知道正确答案,在二元选择问题中得到正确或错误答案的概率为50%。连续10次偶然答错问题的概率为(1/2),10换句话说,约0.1%。很明显,嫌疑人故意一直回答不正确。当假装患有智力发育障碍的嫌疑人对所有问题只回答“我不知道”时,没有积极表现出症状,很难证明这些症状在精神病学上是相互矛盾的,也很难证明它们是在装病。即使在这种情况下,这种基于强制选择技术的测试可以用来证明嫌疑人的行为是错误的。
    UNASSIGNED: In general clinical psychiatric practice, open questions are favored over closed ones because they are considered more therapeutically effective and less likely to make the patients pander to us. However, in forensic psychiatric examinations, suspects may attempt malingering.
    UNASSIGNED: Using a simple examination based on a forced-choice technique, the author proved that the level of intelligence of a theft suspect pretending to have an intellectual developmental disorder was not so low. The author prepared two sets consisting of a few coins each and asked the suspect to choose which set had a higher total value. The suspect was questioned repeatedly over multiple trials. He always selected the wrong set over the course of more than 10 trials.
    UNASSIGNED: If the suspect really did not know the correct answer, the probability of getting the answer right or wrong in a binary choice question is 50% for both. The probability of answering the question wrong by chance 10 times in a row is (1/2),10 in other words, about 0.1%. It was evident that the suspect intentionally kept answering incorrectly. When suspects who pretend to have an intellectual developmental disorder answer only \"I do not know\" to all questions without actively playing out the symptoms, it is difficult to demonstrate that the symptoms are psychiatrically conflicting and prove that they are malingering. Even in such cases, this type of test based on a forced-choice technique can be used to prove that suspects are behaving falsely.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号