acute pain

急性疼痛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项荟萃分析旨在通过综合现有研究来检查氯胺酮在急性和预防慢性开胸术后疼痛的管理中的有效性。
    在PubMed,Scopus,和科克伦图书馆到2023年5月。包括研究氯胺酮对成人开胸术后疼痛影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。干预组包括氯胺酮加吗啡,而对照组仅包括吗啡。结果指标是阿片类药物摄入量和休息和移动/咳嗽时的疼痛评分。使用Cochrane偏差风险和等级评估来评估证据质量。
    选择包含556名患者的9篇文章进行荟萃分析。干预组静息时疼痛显着降低(Std。术后第一天的平均差(SMD=-0.60,95%CI[-0.83,-0.37])和运动/咳嗽(SMD=-0.73[-1.27,-0.18])。此外,与对照组相比,氯胺酮组的阿片类药物消费量(mg)较低(SMD=-2.75[-4.14,-1.36],p值=0.0001)在术后第1-3天。没有数据来评估氯胺酮对慢性疼痛的长期影响。
    这项荟萃分析表明,使用氯胺酮可以降低开胸手术后的急性疼痛水平和吗啡使用。在未来,使用标准化方法进行更大规模的随机对照试验,并评估氯胺酮的短期和长期镇痛效果,对于加深对该问题的理解是必要的.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aims to examine how effective ketamine is in the management of acute and preventing chronic post-thoracotomy pain by synthesizing the available research.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library till May 2023. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) examining the influence of ketamine on post-thoracotomy pain in adults were included. The intervention group included ketamine plus morphine, while the control group included morphine only. The outcome measures were opioid intake and pain scores at rest and on moving/coughing. Evidence quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and GRADE assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine articles comprising 556 patients were selected for meta-analysis. The intervention group had a significant decrease in pain at rest (Std. Mean Difference (SMD = -0.60 with 95% CI [-0.83, -0.37]) and on movement/cough (SMD = -0.73 [-1.27, -0.18]) in the first postoperative days. Also, the ketamine group had lower opioid consumption (mg) in comparison with controls (SMD = -2.75 [-4.14, -1.36], p-value = 0.0001) in postoperative days 1-3. There was no data to assess the long-term effect of ketamine on chronic pain.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis shows that ketamine use can lower acute pain levels and morphine use after thoracotomy. In the future, larger RCTs using standardized methods and assessing both short-term and long-term analgesic effects of ketamine are necessary to deepen the understanding of the issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自由选择分析(FCP)方法允许观察者使用自己的词汇定性评估动物行为。这项研究的目的是调查3个不同的观察者组的能力,以识别20只狗疼痛相关的情绪,使用FCP方法,并将FCP数据与格拉斯哥综合疼痛量表(GCPS-SF)评分进行比较。观察组由10名狗主人组成,10名兽医学生和10名兽医。拍摄了10只健康(“健康”)狗和10只显示疼痛临床症状(“疼痛”)的狗,并向对研究的疼痛相关性质视而不见的观察者展示了由此产生的20个片段。所有观察者使用FCP对动物的情绪表达进行描述和评分;然后,学生和兽医使用GCPS-SF对所有狗进行评分。使用广义Procrustes分析(GPA)分析FCP数据。Spearman相关系数(ρ)用于确定前两个FCP维度(DIM1和DIM2)的观察者组FCP得分之间的相关性,并将学生和兽医观察组的GCPS-SF得分与FCP得分进行比较。每个观察组达到显著的(p<0.001)良好的共识特征。“健康”的狗主要被描述为“安静”和“活泼”,而大多数“痛苦”的狗被认为是“痛苦”和“痛苦”。所有者\'DIM1和学生\'DIM1之间的FCP分数之间的相关性很高(ρ=-0.86),所有者\'DIM2和学生\'DIM2(ρ=0.72)和学生\'DIM2和兽医\'DIM1(ρ=0.70)。学生的DIM2(ρ=0.77)和兽医的DIM1(ρ=0.92)的GCPS-SF得分与FCP得分之间的相关性很高。定性方法如FCP可与半定量方法结合使用,以评估疼痛对动物情绪表达的影响。观察者的文化背景和个人经验对急性躯体疼痛犬的定性行为评估没有实质性影响。
    Free Choice Profiling (FCP) methodology allows observers to qualitatively assess animal behavior using their own vocabulary. This study aims to investigate the ability of 3 different observer groups to recognize pain-related emotions in 20 dogs using FCP methodology, and to compare FCP data with the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale-Short Form (GCPS- SF) scores. The observer groups consisted of 10 dog owners, 10 veterinary students and 10 veterinarians. Ten healthy (\"healthy\") dogs and 10 dogs showing clinical signs of pain (\"pain\") were filmed, and the resulting 20 footages were shown to observers who were blind to the pain-related nature of the study. All observers described and scored animals\' emotional expression using FCP; then, students and veterinarians scored all dogs using GCPS- SF. FCP data were analyzed using Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA). Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to determine the correlation among observer groups\' FCP scores of the first two FCP dimensions (DIM1 and DIM2), and to compare GCPS-SF scores with FCP scores for the students and veterinarian observer groups. Each observer group reached a significant (p < 0.001) good consensus profile. \"Healthy\" dogs were mainly described as \"quiet\" and \"lively\", while the majority of \"pain\" dogs were considered \"in pain\" and \"suffering\". The correlation among FCP scores was high between owners\' DIM1 and students\' DIM1 (ρ = -0.86), owners\' DIM2 and students\' DIM2 (ρ = 0.72) and students\' DIM2 and vets\' DIM1 (ρ = 0.70). The correlation between GCPS-SF scores and FCP scores was high for students\' DIM2 (ρ = 0.77) and for veterinarians\' DIM1 (ρ = 0.92). Qualitative methods such as FCP could be used in association with semi-quantitative methods to evaluate the effect of pain on animal emotional expression. Observers\' cultural background and personal experience did not substantially affect qualitative behavioral assessment in dogs with acute somatic pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    纳米技术的新兴领域为药物输送系统的革命性进步铺平了道路,纳米系统正在成为增强各种生物活性化合物的治疗潜力和稳定性的有希望的途径。其中,大麻二酚(CBD),大麻植物的非精神药物化合物,因其治疗特性而受到关注。因此,研究人员付出了巨大的努力来释放CBD临床益处的全部潜力,各种纳米系统和赋形剂已经出现,以克服与其生物利用度相关的挑战,稳定性,和控释的透皮应用。因此,这篇全面的综述旨在解释CBD在治疗急性炎性疼痛中的作用,并概述了现有CBD给药系统和赋形剂的最新技术。总结这篇综述,将讨论大麻素和CBD的治疗靶标的摘要,其次是传统的管理方式。还将审查给药的透皮途径和目前的局部和透皮递送系统。这篇综述将总结体内技术的概述,这些技术可以评估这些系统的抗炎和镇痛潜力。
    The emerging field of nanotechnology has paved the way for revolutionary advancements in drug delivery systems, with nanosystems emerging as a promising avenue for enhancing the therapeutic potential and the stability of various bioactive compounds. Among these, cannabidiol (CBD), the non-psychotropic compound of the Cannabis sativa plant, has gained attention for its therapeutic properties. Consequently, researchers have devoted significant efforts to unlock the full potential of CBD\'s clinical benefits, where various nanosystems and excipients have emerged to overcome challenges associated with its bioavailability, stability, and controlled release for its transdermal application. Therefore, this comprehensive review aims to explain CBD\'s role in managing acute inflammatory pain and offers an overview of the state of the art of existing delivery systems and excipients for CBD. To summarize this review, a summary of the cannabinoids and therapeutical targets of CBD will be discussed, followed by its conventional modes of administration. The transdermal route of administration and the current topical and transdermal delivery systems will also be reviewed. This review will conclude with an overview of in vivo techniques that allow the evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and analgesic potentials of these systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管研究表明,只有不到一半的手术患者报告术后疼痛得到有效缓解,大多数患者忍受急性术后不适。为了减轻和控制术后疼痛,各种术前,术中,术后治疗和管理方法可用。几年来,一种名为丁丙诺啡的阿片类药物已成为治疗许多不同人口统计学患者阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的有效工具。然而,它在治疗慢性疼痛或术后疼痛的患者时可以看到它的使用障碍,他们也有一个OUD。虽然丁丙诺啡在临床环境中可能未得到充分利用,使用该药物时慢性滥用率明显较低,因此对患者来说是一种有吸引力的治疗选择。本文旨在探索广泛的研究,以检查丁丙诺啡作为镇痛药以及如何将其用于术前疼痛和术后疼痛。本文将对丁丙诺啡及其在慢性疼痛和OUD患者中的应用进行深入分析。通过数据库PubMed识别研究进行了系统的文献综述。收集了来自各种出版物的数据,并优先考虑了过去三年内的出版物。我们回顾了研究丁丙诺啡后患者疼痛程度的研究。尽管有长期的药理学证据和临床研究,丁丙诺啡作为镇痛药一直保持神秘感。与其他阿片类药物相比,其在OUD治疗中的使用进一步受到其众所周知的安全益处和相对缺乏精神模拟副作用的影响。对于长期习惯的患者,高剂量阿片类药物可能正在经历痛觉过敏,但没有被医生告知这种现象或丁丙诺啡解决它的潜力,丁丙诺啡明显的抗痛觉过敏作用是一个引人注目的药理学特征,使其作为一种选择特别有吸引力。当在预使用时,pery-,和术后情况,丁丙诺啡提供各种疼痛管理益处,患者仍可从mu-阿片激动剂的有效疼痛管理中获益,同时仍继续服用丁丙诺啡.丁丙诺啡可以根据需要以减少的剂量继续使用,以避免戒断症状并根据现有证据提高与急性术后疼痛联合使用的mu-阿片激动剂的镇痛效率。丁丙诺啡给药需要以患者为中心,多学科策略,考虑了许多围手术期治疗方案的利弊,以获得最大的成功机会。
    Although research suggests that less than half of individuals who have surgical procedures report effective postoperative pain alleviation, the majority of patients endure acute postoperative discomfort. To lessen and manage postoperative pain, a variety of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative treatments and management methods are available. For several years an opioid called buprenorphine has become an effective tool to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) in patients across many different demographics. It has however endured barriers to its usage which can be seen when treating patients with chronic pain or postoperative pain, who also have an OUD. While buprenorphine may be underutilized within the clinical setting, the significantly low rates of chronic abuse when using the drug allow it to be an attractive treatment option for patients. This paper aims to explore a wide range of studies that examine buprenorphine as an analgesic and how it can be used for preoperative pain and postoperative pain. This paper will give an in-depth analysis of buprenorphine and its use in patients with chronic pain as well as OUD. A systematic literature review was performed by identifying studies through the database PubMed. The data from various publications were gathered with preference being given to publications within the last three years. We reviewed studies that examined the pain level of the patients after having buprenorphine. Despite long-available pharmacologic evidence and clinical research, buprenorphine has maintained a mystique as an analgesic. Its usage in the treatment of OUD was further influenced by its well-known safety benefits and relative lack of psychomimetic side effects compared to other opioids. For patients accustomed to long-term, high-dose opioids who may be experiencing hyperalgesia but have not been informed about this phenomenon by their doctors or the potential for buprenorphine to resolve it, buprenorphine\'s pronounced antihyperalgesic effect is a compelling pharmacologic characteristic that makes it particularly attractive as an option. When used in pre-, peri-, and postoperative circumstances, buprenorphine provides various pain-management benefits and patients can still benefit from effective pain management from mu-opioid agonists while remaining on buprenorphine. Buprenorphine can be continued at a reduced dose as needed to avoid withdrawal symptoms and to improve the analgesic efficiency of mu-opioid agonists used in combination with acute postoperative pain in light of the evidence at hand. Buprenorphine administration needs a patient-centered, multidisciplinary strategy that considers the benefits and drawbacks of the many perioperative therapy options to have the best chance of success.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)镇痛可通过右美托咪定等局部麻醉佐剂延长。本研究旨在评价右美托咪定两种给药途径对急性疼痛和慢性神经性疼痛(NeuP)的预防与不使用右美托咪定的比较。
    共有216例患者被随机分配接受仅使用0.4%罗哌卡因的TPVB(R组),使用右美托咪定0.5μg·kg-1(RD0.5组)或1.0μg·kg-1(RD1.0组),或静脉注射(IV)右美托咪定0.5μg·kg-1·h-1(RDiv组)。主要结果是慢性NeuP的发生率,定义为手术后3个月的利兹神经病变症状和体征评估(LANSS)疼痛评分>12分。
    (1)对于主要结果,RD0.5组和RD1.0组显示术后3个月慢性NeuP发生率降低;(2)与R组相比,RDiv集团,RD0.5组,RD1.0组可以降低休息和运动时的VAS评分和术后12和24小时的Prince-Henry疼痛评分,口服吗啡当量(OME)和改善POD1时的QOD-15;(3)与RDiv组相比,RD0.5组和RD1.0组可以降低休息和运动时的VAS评分以及术后12和24小时的Prince-Henry疼痛评分,术后OME消耗,改善POD1时QOD-15;(4)与RD0.5组相比,RD1.0组在术后12和24小时休息时有效降低VAS评分,手术后12小时的运动VAS评分和Prince-Henry疼痛评分。然而,RD1.0组嗜睡发生率增加。
    右美托咪定在减轻急性疼痛方面同样有效,但只有右美托咪定减少慢性NeuP。此外,考虑到术后并发症,如嗜睡,右美托咪定(0.5μg·kg-1)可能是更合适的选择。
    中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200058982)。
    UNASSIGNED: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) analgesia can be prolonged by local anesthetic adjuvants such as dexmedetomidine. This study aimed to evaluate the two administration routes of dexmedetomidine on acute pain and chronic neuropathic pain (NeuP) prevention compared with no dexmedetomidine.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 216 patients were randomized to receive TPVB using 0.4% ropivacaine alone (R Group), with perineural dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg·kg-1 (RD0.5 Group) or 1.0 μg·kg-1 (RD1.0 Group), or intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1 (RDiv Group). The primary outcome was the incidence of chronic NeuP, defined as a Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain score > 12 points at 3-month after surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: (1) For the primary outcome, RD0.5 Group and RD1.0 Group demonstrated a decreased incidence of chronic NeuP at 3-month after surgery; (2) Compared with R Group, RDiv Group, RD0.5 Group, and RD1.0 Group can reduce VAS scores at rest and movement and Prince-Henry Pain scores at 12 and 24-h after surgery, the consumption of oral morphine equivalent (OME) and improve QOD-15 at POD1; (3) Compared with RDiv Group, RD0.5 Group and RD1.0 Group can reduce VAS scores at rest and movement and Prince-Henry Pain scores at 12 and 24-h after surgery, the consumption of postoperative OME and improve QOD-15 at POD1; (4) Compared with RD0.5 Group, RD1.0 Group effectively reduced VAS scores at rest at 12 and 24-h after surgery, VAS scores in movement and Prince-Henry Pain scores at 12-h after surgery. However, RD1.0 Group showed an increased incidence of drowsiness.
    UNASSIGNED: Perineural or IV dexmedetomidine are similarly effective in reducing acute pain, but only perineural dexmedetomidine reduced chronic NeuP. Moreover, considering postoperative complications such as drowsiness, perineural dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg·kg-1) may be a more appropriate choice.
    UNASSIGNED: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200058982).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    针灸有望作为减少急诊科(ED)急性疼痛的有效非药物选择。遵循CONSORT和STRICTA准则,随机对照试验(RCT)通常报告干预细节和穴位选择,但是忠于针灸干预,对干预研究的可靠性至关重要,很少报道。
    ACUITY是由NCCIH资助的,3种ED针刺的多部位可行性RCT(克利夫兰,纳什维尔,和圣地亚哥)。ACUITY针灸师接受了研究设计培训,反应灵敏的针灸手册协议,通过为跟踪保真度而创建的REDCap表单,物流和实时记录会话详细信息。
    在3个招聘地点,79名参与者接受针灸治疗:51%的女性,43%黑人/非洲裔美国人,基线时异质性急性疼痛部位:32%腰背,22%四肢,20%腹部,10%的头。务实,参与者在ED公共区域接受治疗(52%),私人房间(39%),和半私人房间(9%)。客观跟踪发现98%坚持针灸手册协议的六个组成部分:分期,插入点的数量(M=13.2,范围2-22),针头保留时间(M=23.5分钟,范围4-52),会话长度(M=40.3分钟,范围20-66),是否提供了一般性建议,并填写了会议表格。
    据我们所知,这是第一个评估和报告针灸方案保真度的RCT.保真度监测将是ACUITY2的基础,这将是未来的决定性因素,多点RCT。此外,我们建议在未来的RCT中,将针灸干预的保真度添加到CONSORT和STRICTA报告指南中.
    本研究方案注册于clinicaltrials.gov:NCT04880733。
    UNASSIGNED: Acupuncture shows promise as an effective nonpharmacologic option for reduction of acute pain in the emergency department (ED). Following CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) generally report intervention details and acupoint options, but fidelity to acupuncture interventions, critical to reliability in intervention research, is rarely reported.
    UNASSIGNED: ACUITY is an NCCIH-funded, multi-site feasibility RCT of acupuncture in 3 EDs (Cleveland, Nashville, and San Diego). ACUITY acupuncturists were trained in study design, responsive acupuncture manualization protocol, logistics and real-time recording of session details via REDCap forms created to track fidelity.
    UNASSIGNED: Across 3 recruiting sites, 79 participants received acupuncture: 51 % women, 43 % Black/African American, with heterogeneous acute pain sites at baseline: 32 % low back, 22 % extremity, 20 % abdominal, 10 % head. Pragmatically, participants were treated in ED common areas (52 %), private rooms (39 %), and semi-private rooms (9 %). Objective tracking found 98 % adherence to the six components of the acupuncture manualization protocol: staging, number of insertion points (M = 13.2, range 2-22), needle retention time (M = 23.5 min, range 4-52), session length (M = 40.3 min, range 20-66), whether general recommendations were provided and completion of the session form.
    UNASSIGNED: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first RCT to assess and report fidelity to an acupuncture protocol. Fidelity monitoring will be fundamental for ACUITY2, which would be a future definitive, multi-site RCT. Furthermore, we recommend that fidelity to acupuncture interventions be added to CONSORT and STRICTA reporting guidelines in future RCTs.
    UNASSIGNED: The protocol of this study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04880733.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了最大程度地减少伤害,必须对小牛进行解角,因为密集的饲养环境使角牛更具攻击性。然而,急性疼痛通常被农场动物在经历痛苦的行为时感知到,例如去角,影响他们的健康状况和生活质量。通过量化与去角相关的疼痛和不适的程度,我们的目标是为更人性化和可持续的养牛业做出贡献。
    这项研究的目的是评估行为,生理,和使用两种方法对小牛急性解角疼痛的情绪影响:解角霜和解角热铁。选择了30只4天大的荷斯坦小牛进行研究。根据分离方法将这些小牛随机分配到两个实验组:脱角霜(n=15)和热铁脱角(n=15)。解角之前和之后,我们评估了他们的红外眼睛温度的生理指标,P物质的浓度,IL-6皮质醇,触珠蛋白,以及情绪状态,和疼痛相关的行为反应。
    后解禁,两组患者的卧床时间(DI和DC:0-4h)均显著缩短(p<0.05)。两组均表现出疼痛相关行为的频率增加,例如摇头(DI:1-7小时,直流:1-6小时),耳弹(DI:2-7小时,直流:2-7小时),头部刮伤(DI:2-3小时,直流:1-7小时),和顶部磨损(DI:2小时,DC:2-7小时)与预脱角相比(p<0.05)。DC组表现出更高的摇头频率,耳鸣,刮头,和顶部摩擦行为,随着较长的躺下时间(0-4小时),与DI组相比(p<0.05)。解角后,两组(6-8小时)的游戏行为均显著降低(p<0.05),而判断偏倚和恐惧水平无显著变化(p>0.05)。生理测量,包括眼睛温度,和血液中P物质和IL-6的水平,在去角化前后各组之间没有显着差异(p>0.05)。然而,解角后48小时,与DI组相比,DC组的小牛的触珠蛋白水平明显更高(p=0.015)。此外,去角化后3.5h和7h时,DC组唾液皮质醇水平显着增加(p=0.018,p=0.043)。
    热铁和奶油脱角都会引起小牛疼痛,疼痛相关行为的增加证明了这一点,唾液皮质醇升高,和更高的触珠蛋白水平,同时减少了积极的行为。值得注意的是,这些效应在DC组比DI组更明显,这表明对小牛来说,脱角热铁可能是一种压力相对较小的脱角方法。此外,在这项研究中,在13日龄的小牛中观察到的疼痛反应持续时间短,并且对解角反应较弱,这表明在较年轻的年龄进行解角可能更可取,值得进一步研究.
    UNASSIGNED: Dehorning calves is necessary to minimize injury because intensive raising circumstances make horned cows more aggressive. However, acute pain is commonly perceived by farm animals when undergoing painful practices such as dehorning, affecting their health status and quality of life. By quantifying the magnitude of pain and discomfort associated with dehorning, we aim to contribute to a more humane and sustainable cattle farming industry.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to evaluate the behavioral, physiological, and emotional effects of acute dehorning pain in calves using two methods: dehorning cream and dehorning hot-iron.30 Holstein calves aged 4 days were selected for the study. These calves were randomly assigned to two experimental groups based on the method of disbudding: dehorning cream (n = 15) and hot-iron dehorning (n = 15). Before and after dehorning, we evaluated their physiological indicators of infrared eye temperature, concentrations of substance P, IL-6, cortisol, haptoglobin, as well as emotional state, and pain-related behavioral reactions.
    UNASSIGNED: Post-dehorning, the duration of lying down decreased significantly in both groups (DI and DC: 0-4 h) after dehorning (p < 0.05). Both groups exhibited increased frequencies of pain-related behaviors such as head shaking (DI: 1-7 h, DC: 1-6 h), ear flicking (DI: 2-7 h, DC: 2-7 h), head scratching (DI: 2-3 h, DC: 1-7 h), and top scuffing (DI: 2 h, DC: 2-7 h) compared to pre-dehorning (p < 0.05). The DC group demonstrated a higher frequency of head-shaking, ear-flicking, head-scratching, and top-rubbing behaviors, along with a longer duration of lying down (0-4 h), compared to the DI group (p < 0.05). Post-dehorning, play behavior reduced significantly in both groups (6-8 h) (p < 0.05), whereas judgment bias and fear levels showed no significant change (p > 0.05). Physiological measures including eye temperature, and blood levels of substance P and IL-6, did not differ significantly between the groups before and after dehorning (p > 0.05). However, 48 h after dehorning, calves in the DC group had significantly higher haptoglobin levels compared to the DI group (p = 0.015). Additionally, salivary cortisol levels in the DC group increased significantly at 3.5 h and 7 h post-dehorning (p = 0.018, p = 0.043).
    UNASSIGNED: Both hot-iron and cream dehorning induced pain in calves, as evidenced by increased pain-related behaviors, elevated salivary cortisol, and higher haptoglobin levels, alongside reduced positive behaviors. Notably, these effects were more pronounced in the DC group than in the DI group, suggesting that dehorning hot-iron may be a comparatively less stressful dehorning method for young calves. Moreover, the brief duration of pain response and weaker response to dehorning observed in 13-day-age calves in this study suggests that dehorning at younger ages may be more advisable and warrants further research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在肌肉骨骼和运动医学中,传统上疼痛与组织损伤有关,通常假设组织损伤和疼痛强度之间存在线性相关性。然而,现代疼痛科学阐明了人类疼痛体验的复杂性,融入社会心理因素,神经系统致敏,免疫反应,和大脑的结构变化作为因素。这种对疼痛的当代理解已证明对治疗疼痛个体和经历疼痛的临床医生都非常有益。疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)为疼痛患者提供对其疼痛经历的潜在神经生物学和神经生理学的理解,这已经被证明可以减少自我报告的疼痛,减少残疾,减轻恐惧和避免恐惧的行为,减轻痛苦的灾难,改善运动。目前,对PNE的研究主要集中在对持续性或慢性疼痛患者的干预措施上.然而,那些经历急性的人,亚急性,围手术期疼痛也有可能导致恐惧水平升高,恐惧-回避,痛苦的灾难,表明PNE的潜在好处。这篇特邀评论旨在向读者介绍疼痛科学的最新进展,并提出在急性疼痛体验中提供PNE的概念模型。
    5.
    In musculoskeletal and sports medicine, pain has traditionally been linked to tissue injury, often assuming a linear correlation between tissue damage and pain intensity. However, modern pain science has illuminated the complexity of the human pain experience, incorporating psychosocial elements, nervous system sensitization, immune responses, and structural changes in the brain as factors. This contemporary understanding of pain has proven highly beneficial for both clinicians treating individuals in pain and those experiencing pain. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) provides individuals in pain with an understanding of the underlying neurobiology and neurophysiology of their pain experience, which has been shown to result in decreased self-reported pain, reduced disability, the alleviation of fear and fear-avoidance behaviors, diminished pain catastrophizing, and improved movement. Currently, research on PNE predominantly focuses on interventions with individuals with persistent or chronic pain conditions. However, those who experience acute, sub-acute, and perioperative pain also have the potential for elevated levels of fear, fear-avoidance, and pain catastrophizing, indicating potential benefits from PNE. This invited commentary seeks to inform readers about the latest advancements in pain science and propose a conceptual model for delivering PNE in acute pain experiences.
    UNASSIGNED: 5.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的随机对照试验(RCTs)研究了芝麻油在肢体创伤患者中的镇痛活性;然而,他们的发现是不一致的。因此,本综述旨在阐明芝麻油局部给药对成人肢体轻微创伤门诊患者急性疼痛的影响。在线数据库(例如,Scopus,PubMed,WebofScience)进行了搜索,截至2024年1月31日。如果将应用标准治疗加局部芝麻油与单独或与安慰剂/假治疗一起施用标准治疗的效果进行比较,则包括RCT。建议评估的分级,发展,和评估(等级)和Cochrane协作的偏倚工具的风险被用来解决证据质量和研究的方法学严谨,分别。四个随机对照试验有纳入标准,他们的研究结果汇集在一项采用随机效应方法的荟萃分析中.根据汇总分析,与接受对照条件的患者相比,疼痛评分从基线至第2/3干预日的平均变化降低显著高于接受标准护理和每日芝麻油按摩的患者(加权平均差异:-1.10;95%置信区间[-1.62,-0.57];p<0.001).然而,证据质量适中,只有两项研究方法严谨。因此,需要进行更多高质量的研究,以得出基于证据的确凿证据的结论,说明局部用芝麻油对缓解急性外伤性肢体疼痛的有利作用.
    Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the analgesic activity of sesame oil among patients with limb trauma; nevertheless, their findings are inconsistent. Hence, this review aimed to clarify the impact of topical administration of sesame oil on acute pain of adult outpatients with minor limb trauma. The online databases (e.g., Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched up to 31 January 2024. The RCTs were included if they compared the effect of applying standard treatments plus topical sesame oil to administering standard treatments alone or with a placebo/sham treatment. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and the Cochrane Collaboration\'s risk of bias tool were applied to address the evidence quality and the study\'s methodological rigour, respectively. Four RCTs had the inclusion criteria, and their findings were pooled in a meta-analysis employing a random-effects approach. According to the pooled analysis, the reduction in mean change of the pain score from baseline to the second/third intervention day was significantly higher in favour of clients who received standard care plus daily massage of the trauma site with sesame oil compared to those who received a control condition (weighted mean difference: -1.10; 95% confidence interval [-1.62, -0.57]; p < 0.001). However, the evidence quality was moderate, and only two studies had good methodological rigour. Hence, more high-quality studies are needed to make a solid evidence-based conclusion about the favourable consequence of topical sesame oil on alleviating acute traumatic limb pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在几种类型的腹部腹腔镜手术后,ESPB可以减轻术后疼痛。关于ESPB在腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术中的作用的数据很少。这项研究的目的是测试ESPB在此过程中的术后镇痛效果。
    方法:在此前瞻性中,双盲,随机对照研究,接受腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术的成年患者被随机分配到双侧术前ESPB,导管水平为Th7(2×30ml,2.5mg/ml罗哌卡因或生理盐水),术后每6小时进行一次导管置管,持续24小时。主要结果是术后第一个小时内的抢救阿片类药物消耗。次要结果是4小时和24小时的阿片类药物总消费量,疼痛评分,恶心,镇静,以及第一周的恢复质量15(QoR-15)和EuroQol-5维度(EQ-5D-5L)。
    结果:总计,64例患者被纳入主要结局指标。在术后1小时的救援阿片类药物的消耗(口服吗啡当量(OME))没有显着差异,ESPB组26.9±17.1mg与安慰剂组32.4±24.3mg(平均±SD)(p=0.27)。在7天的观察期内,次要结局没有显着差异。七名病人在术后接受了抢救,为五名患者提供镇痛。
    结论:我们发现ESPB和安慰剂在腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术中的测量结果没有差异。未来的研究可能会评估使用更高浓度和/或不同胸腔水平进行的阻滞是否会提供更多的镇痛效果。
    背景:NCT04438369;18/06/2020。.
    BACKGROUND: The Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) reduces postoperative pain after several types of abdominal laparoscopic surgeries. There is sparse data on the effect of ESPB in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to test the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ESPB for this procedure.
    METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study, adult patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were randomly assigned to either bilateral preoperative ESPB with catheters at the level of Th7 (2 × 30 ml of either 2.5 mg/ml ropivacaine or saline), with postoperative catheter top ups every 6 h for 24 h. The primary outcome was rescue opioid consumption during the first hour postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption at 4 h and 24 h, pain scores, nausea, sedation, as well as Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) during the first week.
    RESULTS: In total, 64 patients were included in the primary outcome measure. There was no significant difference in rescue opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents (OME)) at one hour postoperatively, with the ESPB group 26.9 ± 17.1 mg versus 32.4 ± 24.3 mg (mean ± SD) in the placebo group (p= 0.27). There were no significant differences concerning the secondary outcomes during the seven-day observation period. Seven patients received a rescue block postoperatively, providing analgesia in five patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in measured outcomes between ESPB and placebo in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Future studies may evaluate whether a block performed using higher concentration and/or at a different thoracic level provides more analgesic efficacy.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04438369 ; 18/06/2020. .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号