Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a potentially fatal disease that can occur at any duration of treatment. Patients may present with vague respiratory symptoms such as progressive cough, dyspnea, and decreased activity tolerance. Among checkpoint inhibitors, CIP is higher in programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. An 82-year-old Latina woman with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2-negative lobular carcinoma of the right breast had been treated by partial mastectomy followed by adjuvant hormonal treatment and radiation in 2014. Then CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) was followed by letrozole and abemaciclib, PD-1, therapy in 2022. In 2023, the patient presented with a dry cough and worsening dyspnea with a new oxygen requirement. She was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of multifocal pneumonia and sepsis. She unfortunately developed rapidly higher oxygen requirements and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and was ultimately presumed to have CIP. She was intubated on hospital day 6 and extubated on day 12 with no plans for reintubation and do-not-resuscitate status. She subsequently had demise after a period of respiratory arrest. CIP is rare but associated with fatal outcomes, especially with the development of ARDS. It is important, along the course of cancer treatment and goals of care discussion, to educate patients and their families on possible side effects of chemotherapy and involve specialists early with the goal of lowering mortality rates. Most patients do not survive this unfortunate progression of disease.

The current 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is about 12%, making it one of the deadliest malignancies. The rapid metastasis, acquired drug resistance, and poor patient prognosis necessitate better therapeutic strategies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Multiple studies show that combining chemotherapeutics for solid tumors has been successful. Targeting two distinct emerging hallmarks, such as non-mutational epigenetic changes by panobinostat (Pan) and delayed cell cycle progression by abemaciclib (Abe), inhibits pancreatic cancer growth. HDAC and CDK4/6 inhibitors are effective but are prone to drug resistance and failure as single agents. Therefore, we hypothesized that combining Abe and Pan could synergistically and lethally affect PDAC survival and proliferation. Multiple cell-based assays, enzymatic activity experiments, and flow cytometry experiments were performed to determine the effects of Abe, Pan, and their combination on PDAC cells and human dermal fibroblasts. Western blotting was used to determine the expression of cell cycle, epigenetic, and apoptosis markers. The Abe-Pan combination exhibited excellent efficacy and produced synergistic effects, altering the expression of cell cycle proteins and epigenetic markers. Pan, alone and in combination with Abe, caused apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Abe-Pan co-treatment showed relative safety in normal human dermal fibroblasts. Our novel combination treatment of Abe and Pan shows synergistic effects on PDAC cells. The combination induces apoptosis, shows relative safety, and merits further investigation due to its therapeutic potential in the treatment of PDAC.

BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a milestone in the breast cancer treatment. Due to the potential impact of adverse effects on treatment decisions and patient outcomes, careful consideration of the varying toxicities of CDK4/6 inhibitors is crucial, as three inhibitors-palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib-have been approved with differences in adverse event profiles. However, limitations in clinical trials call for urgent real-world safety studies to evaluate and compare the risk of adverse events (AEs) among these CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors and provide insights for clinical drug selection, using real world database.
METHODS: The AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (2015-2022) were analyzed. Four disproportionality methods were used to detect safety signals: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Neural Network Propagation, and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Venn analysis was used to compare and select common and specific AEs.
RESULTS: This study included 73,042 patients treated with palbociclib, 25,142 with ribociclib, and 7563 with abemaciclib. All three inhibitors had 27 common AEs. Palbociclib exhibited the highest ROR for hematologic toxicities, while ribociclib showed the highest ROR for macrocytosis, nail disorders, and hepatic lesions. Abemaciclib displayed the highest ROR for mucosal toxicity. Common signals for both palbociclib and ribociclib included hematologic toxicities, decreased immune responsiveness, and aphthous ulcers. Myelosuppression, oral pain, and pseudocirrhosis were common signals for palbociclib and abemaciclib. Anemia, hepatotoxicity, and pneumonitis were observed as common signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib. Furthermore, specific AEs associated with palbociclib included fatigue, alopecia, and stomatitis. For ribociclib, specific AEs included electrocardiogram QT prolongation, thrombocytopenia, and decreased hemoglobin. Abemaciclib was specifically linked to diarrhea, vomiting, and interstitial lung disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed that palbociclib showed a higher risk of hematologic toxicity. Ribociclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and QT prolongation. Abemaciclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal effects, interstitial lung disease, and thrombosis. These findings provide valuable insights for CDK4/6 inhibitor selection.

UNASSIGNED: CDK4/6 inhibitors are the first-line treatment for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Despite their clinical benefit, they can increase healthcare expenditure. To date, there is no thorough comparison among the three approved CDK4/6 inhibitors in terms of their cost-effectiveness.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate and compare the cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with letrozole as a first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer with hormonal-receptor-positivity and HER-2-negativity versus one another and versus letrozole monotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: A 10-year within-cycle-corrected Markov\'s model was employed from the healthcare payer perspective. Costs were obtained from the National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR) in Qatar. Utilities and transition probabilities were calculated from published landmark trials of PALOMA-2, MONALEESA-2, MONARCH-3, PO25, and other relevant literature. Costs, measured in Qatari Riyal (QAR), and effectiveness, measured in quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs), were incremented and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was compared to a willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of 1.5 Qatari GDP (448,758 QAR). A deterministic sensitivity analysis was implemented to account for uncertainties.
UNASSIGNED: Ribociclib was the most effective option, generating 4.420 QALYs, followed by palbociclib (4.406 QALYs), abemaciclib (4.220 QALYs), then letrozole monotherapy (2.093 QALYs). As for cost-effectiveness, ribociclib dominated palbociclib. However, it was not cost-effective compared to abemaciclib (ICER=1,588,545 QAR/QALY). Ribociclib remained dominant over palbociclib with all uncertainties. The base-case conclusion of ribociclib versus abemaciclib remained robust over all uncertainties.
UNASSIGNED: From the healthcare payer perspective in Qatar, ribociclib is the most effective CDK4/6 inhibitor. It was dominant over palbociclib in terms of cost-effectiveness; however, it was not cost-effective compared to abemaciclib at current prices.

The impact of the HER4 receptor on the growth and treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is widely uncertain. Using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, we generated stable HER4 knockout variants derived from the HER4-positive MCF-7, T-47D, and ZR-75-1 breast cancer cell lines. We investigated tumor cell proliferation as well as the cellular and molecular mechanisms of tamoxifen, abemaciclib, AMG232, and NRG1 treatments as a function of HER4 in vitro. HER4 differentially affects the cellular response to tamoxifen and abemaciclib treatment. Most conspicuous is the increased sensitivity of MCF-7 in vitro upon HER4 knockout and the inhibition of cell proliferation by NRG1. Additionally, we assessed tumor growth and immunological effects as responses to tamoxifen and abemaciclib therapy in humanized tumor mice (HTM) based on MCF-7 HER4-wildtype and the corresponding HER4-knockout cells. Without any treatment, the enhanced MCF-7 tumor growth in HTM upon HER4 knockout suggests a tumor-suppressive effect of HER4 under preclinical but human-like conditions. This phenomenon is associated with an increased HER2 expression in MCF-7 in vivo. Independent of HER4, abemaciclib and tamoxifen treatment considerably inhibited tumor growth in these mice. However, abemaciclib-treated hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with tumor-associated mdm2 gene copy gains or pronounced HER4 expression showed a reduced event-free survival. Evidently, the presence of HER4 affects the efficacy of tamoxifen and abemaciclib treatment in different estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells, even to different extents, and is associated with unfavorable outcomes in abemaciclib-treated patients.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, including abemaciclib, have been approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced, and metastatic breast cancer. Despite the high therapeutic efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors, they are associated with various adverse effects, including potentially fatal interstitial lung disease. Therefore, a combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with letrozole or fulvestrant has been attempted but has demonstrated limitations in reducing adverse effects, highlighting the need to develop new combination therapies. This study proposes a combination strategy using CDK4/6 inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants to enhance the therapeutic outcomes of these inhibitors while reducing their side effects. The therapeutic efficacies of abemaciclib and desipramine were tested in different cancer cell lines (H460, MCF7, and HCT-116). The antitumor effects of the combined abemaciclib and desipramine treatment were evaluated in a xenograft colon tumor model. In vitro cell studies have shown the synergistic anticancer effects of combination therapy in the HCT-116 cell line. The combination treatment significantly reduced tumor size compared with control or single treatment without causing apparent toxicity to normal tissues. Although additional in vivo studies are necessary, this study suggests that the combination therapy of abemaciclib and desipramine may represent a novel therapeutic approach for treating solid tumors.

The synthesis, biochemical evaluation and radiosynthesis of a cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor and radioligand was performed. NT431, a newly synthesized 4-fluorobenzyl-abemaciclib, exhibited high potency to CDK4/6 and against four cancer cell lines with IC50 similar to that of the parent abemaciclib. We performed a two-step one-pot radiosynthesis to produce [18F]NT431 with good radiochemical yield (9.6 ± 3%, n = 3, decay uncorrected), high radiochemical purity (>95%), and high molar activity (>370 GBq/µmol (>10.0 Ci/µmol). In vitro autoradiography confirmed the specific binding of [18F]NT431 to CDK4/6 in brain tissues. Dynamic PET imaging supports that both [18F]NT431 and the parent abemaciclib crossed the BBB albeit with modest brain uptake. Therefore, we conclude that it is unlikely that NT431 or abemaciclib (FDA approved drug) can accumulate in the brain in sufficient concentrations to be potentially effective against breast cancer brain metastases or brain cancers. However, despite the modest BBB penetration, [18F]NT431 represents an important step towards the development and evaluation of a new generation of CDK4/6 inhibitors with superior BBB penetration for the treatment and visualization of CDK4/6 positive tumors in the CNS. Also, [18F]NT431 may have potential application in peripheral tumors such as breast cancer and other CDK4/6 positive tumors.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype with high metastasis and mortality rates. Given the lack of actionable targets such as ER and HER2, TNBC still remains an unmet therapeutic challenge. Despite harboring high CDK4/6 expression levels, the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibition in TNBC has been limited due to the emergence of resistance. The resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition is mainly mediated by RB1 inactivation. Since our aim is to overcome resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition, in this study, we primarily used the cell lines that do not express RB1. Following a screening for activated receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) upon CDK4/6 inhibition, we identified the TAM (Tyro3, Axl, and MerTK) RTKs as a crucial therapeutic vulnerability in TNBC. We show that targeting the TAM receptors with a novel inhibitor, sitravatinib, significantly sensitizes TNBC to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Upon prolonged HER2 inhibitor treatment, HER2+ breast cancers suppress HER2 expression, physiologically transforming into TNBC-like cells. We further show that the combined treatment is highly effective against drug-resistant HER2+ breast cancer as well. Following quantitative proteomics and RNA-seq data analysis, we extended our study into the immunophenotyping of TNBC. Given the roles of the TAM receptors in promoting the creation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), we further demonstrate that the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib and sitravatinib modifies the immune landscape of TNBC to favor immune checkpoint blockade. Overall, our study offers a novel and highly effective combination therapy against TNBC and potentially treatment-resistant HER2+ breast cancer that can be rapidly moved to the clinic.

Various classes of targeted therapies have emerged in the last few years, which have revolutionized cancer treatment, and improved the prognosis and survival of cancer patients. Unfortunately, these agents have serious toxic effects on the kidneys. Some of the toxic effects are hypertension, acute kidney injury (AKI), and proteinuria. One interesting phenomenon that has emerged recently is pseudo-acute kidney injury due to the interference with the tubular secretion of creatinine by some of the targeted therapeutic agents. Understanding this physiology is needed to avoid unnecessary investigation and withholding of lifesaving chemo regimen. Alternative methods to assess renal function such as cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can differentiate true AKI from pseudo-AKI. Here, we describe one such case of pseudo-AKI from cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, which inhibits tubular secretion of creatinine. Using cystatin-C-based eGFR revealed pseudo-AKI in this case.

UNASSIGNED: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represent the gold standard of the hormone receptor positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative advanced breast cancer. However, optimal treatment after disease progression is a matter of debate. We aimed to assess predictive and prognostic factors associated with the treatment outcome following CDK4/6i progression.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed patients who progressed on CDK4/6i treatment between 2018 and 2024. Treatment based on molecular findings (PIK3CA mutation), genetic findings (BRCA1/2 germline mutation), or adapted to the change in the tumor phenotype in rebiopsy (anti-HER2 therapy in the transformation to HER-2-positive disease) was grouped into tailored treatment and compared to the endocrine-based therapy and chemotherapy alone.
UNASSIGNED: Five hundred twelve patients were treated with CDK4/6i. Two hundred patients with disease progression were enrolled in the study. Duration of response to CDK4/6i was not predictive of the response to subsequent treatment, whereas the progression in the central nervous system was the worst prognostic factor. Thirty patients were ineligible for subsequent treatment. Survival after CDK4/6i progression was significantly longer in patients eligible for tailored treatment. The median PFS in patients with tailored treatment (n=19) was 13.5 months vs. 4.9 months in patients with non-tailored therapy (n=151; p=0.045). 12-month PFS was 54.1% with tailored treatment [95% CI 24.1-76.7%] compared to 18.5% with non-tailored therapy [95% CI 11.6-26.6%]. The median OS for patients treated with a tailored approach was not reached compared to 11.5 months with non-tailored treatment (p=0.016). The 24-month OS for patients treated with a tailored approach was 80.2% [95% CI 40.3-94.8%] compared to 21.1% [95% CI 12.2-31.7%] for patients with non-tailored treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Tailoring of subsequent treatment strategy seems to be essential for achieving long-term benefit. Further studies are required, as the prognosis after CDK4/6i progression remains dismal, especially in cases affecting the central nervous system.