Umbrella review

雨伞评论
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本综述的目的是基于当前的系统评价和荟萃分析,调查环境空气污染与肥胖之间关联的综合和综合证据。来自包括PubMed在内的数据库的相关研究,EMBASE,WebofScience,还有Cochrane图书馆,在分析中考虑了2023年7月16日之前发布的。所有选定的系统评价和荟萃分析均按照PRISMA指南纳入。使用AMSTAR2工具评估偏倚风险和方法学质量。该总括审查的方案记录在PROSPERO中,注册号为:CRD42023450191。这项综述确定了7项研究,包括5个荟萃分析和2个系统综述,评估空气污染物对肥胖的影响。通常检查的空气污染物包括PM1,PM2.5,PM10,NO2,SO2,O3。大多数纳入的研究表明,空气污染暴露与肥胖风险增加呈正相关。空气污染对肥胖的影响因不同的环境空气污染物而异。这项研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明暴露于空气污染与肥胖风险呈正相关。这些发现进一步表明了加强大气污染防治的重要性。未来的研究应该阐明将空气污染与肥胖联系起来的可能机制和途径。
    The objective of this umbrella review was to investigate comprehensive and synthesized evidence of the association between ambient air pollution and obesity based on the current systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Related studies from databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, published before July 16, 2023, were considered in the analysis. All selected systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias and the methodological quality were evaluated using the AMSTAR 2 tool. The protocol for this umbrella review was documented in PROSPERO with the registration number: CRD42023450191. This umbrella review identified 7 studies, including 5 meta-analyses and 2 systematic reviews, to assess the impacts of air pollutants on obesity. Commonly examined air pollutants included PM1, PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, O3. Most of the included studies presented that air pollution exposure was positively associated with the increased risk of obesity. The impact of air pollution on obesity varied by different ambient air pollutants. This study provided compelling evidence that exposure to air pollution had a positive association with the risk of obesity. These findings further indicate the importance of strengthening air pollution prevention and control. Future studies should elucidate the possible mechanisms and pathways linking air pollution to obesity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    镇静是患者意识状态的抑郁,药物诱导,在医疗过程中可以达到不同的强度。清醒镇静产生最低限度的意识水平,而不损害维持开放气道的能力,保护性反射或对言语和身体刺激的反应。本综述旨在严格评估儿童/青少年镇静的系统评价(SRs)和荟萃分析(MA)。进行了电子数据库搜索,其中包括Pubmed-Medline,WebofScience,科克伦,Scopus,Scielo,Embase,LILACS和TRIP,其范围延长至2023年1月。使用测量工具评估SRs标准2(AMSTAR2)分析SRs的偏倚风险(RoB)。在998个条目中,包括37个SR。在方法质量方面,八项研究被评估为质量极低,四项研究质量低,九项研究质量中等,16个被认为是高质量的。根据目前的指导方针,儿科牙科中使用最多的镇静药物是一氧化二氮和咪达唑仑;然而,支持其使用的现有证据不足,质量低/严重低。推荐使用组合技术(一氧化二氮(30-50%)咪达唑仑)。口服咪达唑仑的最佳剂量为0.75mg/kg。根据本次总括性审查的结果和未来方向,预计SRs的方法学质量水平将有所提高。
    Sedation is a depression of a patient\'s state of consciousness, induced by medications, that can reach different levels of intensity during a medical procedure. Conscious sedation produces a minimally depressed level of consciousness without impairment of the ability to maintain an open airway, of protective reflexes or of responses to verbal and physical stimulation. This umbrella review is aimed at critically assessing the available systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MA) on sedation in children/adolescents. An electronic database search was conducted that included Pubmed-Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, Scielo, Embase, LILACS and TRIP and the scope of which extended until January 2023. The risk of bias (RoB) of SRs was analyzed using the Measurement Tool to Assess SRs criteria 2 (AMSTAR2). Of 998 entries, 37 SRs were included. In terms of methodological quality, eight studies were assessed as having critically low quality, four studies had low quality, nine studies had moderate quality, and sixteen were considered to be of high quality. Based on the current guidelines, the most employed drugs in pediatric dentistry for sedation are nitrous oxide and midazolam; however, the available evidence supporting their use is insufficient and of low/critically low quality. The combined technique is recommended (nitrous oxide (30-50%) + midazolam). The optimal dose of oral midazolam is 0.75 mg/kg. The level of methodological quality of SRs is expected to increase according to the results and future directions of this umbrella review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的/目标:本系统综述综述旨在总结有关自体牙齿移植成功率和存活率的现有数据。除了分析与这些费率相关的风险因素。方法:根据AMSTAR2指南对各种荟萃分析和系统评价进行综述。系统搜索PubMed上的文献,Scopus,MEDLINE,EMBASE,和Cochrane数据库.其中包括六项系统审查。应用明确的纳入和排除标准。它在PROSPERO中注册了注册号(CRD-42023415623)。结果:审查的研究是2014年至2018年撰写的,这些研究从1968年至2014年的各种研究中提取了信息。根据有关人类自体移植牙齿的选定研究,他们显示以下内容:总体生存率为87.39%,总体成功率为90.29%。这些因素是最常见的关于成功的自体移植的牙齿:年龄,性别,和根系发育阶段。另一方面,在这些研究中,与移植牙齿相关的常见不利结果是失败,强直,和内部根吸收,其次是提取和过度流动。结论:收集的大量证据表明,自体移植是一种高存活率和成功率的手术。此外,危险因素,如根系发育阶段,收件人网站,和供体牙齿类型与手术的负面结果建立了显着的关联。为了成功的牙齿自体移植,患者的选择至关重要。年轻的患者和具有处于最佳牙根发育阶段的供体牙齿的患者通常会经历更好的结果。术前计划应包括全面评估和先进的成像技术,以准确评估供体牙齿和受体部位。尽管如此,考虑到这项研究的异质性和质量,解释上述结果时应谨慎。
    Aim/Objective: This umbrella review of systematic reviews aims to summarize the available data regarding both success and survival rates of tooth autotransplantation, in addition to analyzing the risk factors that are connected to those rates. Methods: This umbrella review was performed according to the evaluation of various meta-analyses and systematic reviews following AMSTAR2 guidelines. A systematic search of literature on PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database. Six systematic reviews were included. Explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. It is registered in PROSPERO under the registration number (CRD-42023415623). Results: The studies reviewed were written from 2014 to 2018, which extracted the information from various studies spanning from 1968 to 2014. According to the selected studies regarding autotransplanted teeth in humans, they showed the following: A survival rate overall of 87.39% and a success rate overall of 90.29%. These factors were the most common in relation to the success of the autotransplanted teeth: age, gender, and stage of root development. On the other hand, common unfavorable results linked to the transplanted teeth in these studies were failure, ankylosis, and internal root resorption, followed by extraction and hypermobility. Conclusions: The wide body of evidence gathered illustrates that autotransplantation is an operation that dispenses high rates of survival and success. Furthermore, risk factors like root development stage, recipient site, and donor tooth type established a remarkable association with the negative outcomes of the procedure. For successful tooth autotransplantation, patient selection is crucial. Younger patients and those with donor teeth at an optimal stage of root development typically experience better outcomes. Preoperative planning should include comprehensive evaluations and advanced imaging techniques to accurately assess both the donor tooth and the recipient site. Nonetheless, on account of heterogeneity and the quality of the studies included in this investigation, caution should be taken when interpreting the mentioned results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:佩戴髋关节保护器是一种用于防止跌倒引起的髋部骨折的措施。然而,其保护作用在以往的研究中仍存在争议.这项研究通过汇集所有当前的荟萃分析证据,为使用髋关节保护剂提供了理论依据。
    方法:我们对目前所有关于髋关节保护剂在社区和/或机构中减少髋部骨折和跌倒的功效的荟萃分析文章进行了综述。主要数据库,包括EMBASE,科克伦图书馆,PubMed和WebofScience,被搜索到2022年6月。两名审稿人筛选了这些研究,提取数据,独立进行方法学质量评价。主要结果是关联统计(比值比(OR),相对风险(RR),等。)在荟萃分析中报告,与对照组相比,量化了干预措施对髋部骨折和跌倒的影响。还进行了叙事合成。森林地块和AMSTAR评分用于描述汇总文献的结果和质量,分别。
    结果:本研究共纳入6篇meta分析文章。对于在机构(护理或住宿护理机构)但在社区中无效的老年人,髋部保护剂可有效减少髋部骨折(RR=0.70,95%CI0.58至0.85,I2=42%,P<0.001)(RR=1.12,95%CI0.94至1.34,I2=0%,P=0.20),它们没有减少跌倒(RR=1.01,95%CI0.90至1.13,I2=0%,P=0.89)。
    结论:髋关节保护剂可有效预防住院老年人髋部骨折,但在社区居住的老年人中无效。
    背景:本研究已在PROSPERO(PROSPEROID:CRD42022351773)中注册。
    BACKGROUND: Wearing hip protectors is a measure used to prevent hip fractures caused by falls. However, its protective effect has remained controversial in previous studies. This study provides a rationale for the use of hip protectors by pooling all the current meta-analysis evidence.
    METHODS: We conducted an umbrella review of all the current meta-analysis articles about the efficacy of hip protectors to reduce hip fractures and falls in communities and/or institutions. Major databases including EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science, were searched up to June 2022. Two reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data, and conducted the methodological quality assessment independently. The primary outcome was the association statistic (odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR), etc.) reported in the meta-analysis that quantified the influence of the intervention on hip fractures and falls compared to that of the control group. Narrative synthesis was also conducted. Forest plots and the AMSTAR score were used to describe the results and quality of the pooled literature, respectively.
    RESULTS: A total of six meta-analysis articles were included in the study. Hip protectors were effective at reducing hip fractures in older individuals who were in institutions (nursing or residential care settings) but not in communities (RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.85, I2 = 42%, P < 0.001) (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.34, I2 = 0%, P = 0.20), and they did not reduce falls (RR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.13, I2 = 0%, P = 0.89).
    CONCLUSIONS: Hip protectors are effective at preventing hip fractures in institutionalized older adults but not in community-dwelling older adults.
    BACKGROUND: This study has been registered in PROSPERO (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022351773).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)影响多达5%的人口,并以冲动症状为特征,多动和注意力不集中。这些症状对患有多动症的儿童和成人有显著损害和额外的风险,包括负面心理健康(例如抑郁症),身体健康(如肥胖)和社会结果(如监禁,离婚)。由于发表了关于ADHD不良后果的广泛证据,很少有研究试图在一份出版物中综合这些风险。
    进行了总括审查以确定审查(系统,荟萃分析和叙述),调查多动症引起的风险。我们对研究结果进行了叙述性综合,并对所包括的出版物进行了质量审查。
    在搜索五个数据库时,已确定16,675条记录。其中,125条审查符合纳入标准。这些发现的叙述性综合强调了与多动症相关的三个关键风险领域:心理健康,身体健康,社会和生活方式。大多数评论都具有良好和中等的质量。
    这篇综述强调了与多动症相关的许多风险,超出了其三个关键症状领域以及病情对日常功能的影响。
    国际系统评价前瞻性注册(PROSPEROCRD42023404073)。
    UNASSIGNED: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) affects up to 5% of the population and is characterised by symptoms of impulsivity, hyperactivity and inattention. These symptoms are significantly impairing and carry additional risks for children and adults with ADHD, including negative mental health (e.g. depression), physical health (e.g. obesity) and societal outcomes (e.g. imprisonment, divorce). Very few studies have attempted to synthesise these risks in one publication due to the breadth of evidence published on the adverse outcomes of ADHD.
    UNASSIGNED: An umbrella review was performed to identify reviews (systematic, meta-analysis and narrative) that investigate the risks arising from having ADHD. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the findings and conducted a quality review of the included publications.
    UNASSIGNED: Upon searching five databases, 16,675 records were identified. Of these, 125 reviews met the criteria for inclusion. A narrative synthesis of these findings highlighted three key domains of risks associated with ADHD: mental health, physical health, social and lifestyle. Most reviews were of good and moderate quality.
    UNASSIGNED: This review highlights the many risks associated with having ADHD, beyond its three key symptom domains and the impact of the condition on daily functioning.
    UNASSIGNED: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023404073).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的人可能会遇到心理和/或认知困难。中风后心理和神经心理干预的研究越来越多,然而,发表的系统综述在范围和方法上有所不同,包括不同类型和严重程度的中风,有时,关于评估的干预措施的有效性得出了不同的结论。在这个伞式审查中,我们旨在系统总结现有的评估心理干预对卒中/TIA后情绪和认知的系统评价。
    我们将根据JBI证据综合手册进行这项总括审查。从一开始将搜索以下数据库:Cochrane系统评论数据库,效果评论数据库(DARE),MEDLINE,Embase,CINAHL,PsycINFO,和认识论。将包括在搜索日期之前发布或不发布荟萃分析的系统评价。包括针对任何中风类型或严重程度的情绪和/或认知结果的心理干预在内的评论将被筛选是否合格。叙事综合,包括内容分析,将被使用。审查的每个阶段都将由两名独立审查者处理,第三名审查者将被考虑解决分歧。将使用AMSTAR2评估纳入的审查的方法质量。
    现有的系统评价为卒中后/TIA心理干预的有效性提供了各种证据。这篇综述旨在总结针对情绪和认知的不同类型的心理和神经心理学干预措施的知识和证据。研究结果将突出重要的知识差距,并有助于优先考虑未来的研究问题。
    该协议于2022年11月15日在国际系统审查前瞻性注册(PROSPERO)中进行了前瞻性注册;PROSPEROCRD42022375947。
    UNASSIGNED: People who have had a stroke or a Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) can experience psychological and/or cognitive difficulties. The body of research for psychological and neuropsychological interventions after stroke is growing, however, published systematic reviews vary in scope and methodology, with different types and severity of strokes included, and at times, diverse conclusions drawn about the effectiveness of the interventions evaluated. In this umbrella review, we aim to systematically summarise the existing systematic reviews evaluating psychological interventions for mood and cognition post-stroke/TIA.
    UNASSIGNED: We will conduct this umbrella review according to the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The following databases will be searched from inception: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Reviews of Effects (DARE), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Epistemonikos. Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis published until the search date will be included. Reviews including psychological interventions addressing mood and/or cognition outcomes for any stroke type or severity will be screened for eligibility. A narrative synthesis, including content analysis, will be used. Each stage of the review will be processed by two independent reviewers and a third reviewer will be considered to resolve disagreements. The methodological quality of the included reviews will be assessed using AMSTAR 2.
    UNASSIGNED: Existing systematic reviews provide varied evidence on the effectiveness of psychological interventions post-stroke/TIA. This umbrella review aims to summarise knowledge and evidence on different types of psychological and neuropsychological interventions targeting mood and cognition. Findings will highlight important knowledge gaps and help prioritise future research questions.
    UNASSIGNED: This protocol was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on November 15, 2022; PROSPERO CRD42022375947.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了防止未来医生的饮食失调,本综述和以往荟萃分析的荟萃分析估计了全球医学生中饮食失调(DE)的患病率,并确定了关键危险因素.
    从成立到2023年2月1日,对四个数据库进行了电子搜索。搜索后来更新至2023年12月31日。
    该搜索得出了医学生的患病率,这些学生在经过验证的DE评估措施中得分高于既定的临界值。这些被计算以提供总体汇总估计。数据取自先前的2条评论。这些系统评价均发现医学生中DE的患病率为15.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:14.7%-15.6%)。等值对冲G=0.30(95%CI:0.29-0.31),等效赔率比=1.74(95%CI:1.71-1.77),I2=97.6%,超过统计学意义为P=.001。修剪和填充调整的效应大小为16.0%(95%CI:14.0%-20.0%)。
    因为饮食失调使学生的安全和幸福处于危险之中,因为早期医生的健康对一个国家的福利至关重要,饮食紊乱的早期迹象必须成为医学院的优先事项,并成为有效预防和干预的信号。建议是确保支持性环境,提供有效的护理,并对学生的饮食行为抱有明确的期望。
    UNASSIGNED: To prevent eating disorders in future physicians, this umbrella review and meta-analysis of previous meta-analyses estimates the prevalence of disordered eating (DE) among medical students worldwide and identifies key risk factors.
    UNASSIGNED: Four databases were searched electronically between their inception and February 1, 2023. The search was later updated to December 31, 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: The search yielded prevalence rates for medical students who scored above established cutoffs on validated assessment measures for DE. These were computed to provide an overall pooled estimate. The data was taken from 2 previous reviews. Both these systematic reviews found a 15.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.7%-15.6%) prevalence rate of DE among medical students. The equivalent Hedges\' G = 0.30 (95% CI: 0.29-0.31), the equivalent odds ratio = 1.74 (95% CI: 1.71-1.77), I2 = 97.6%, and the excess of statistical significance is P = .001. The trim and fill adjusted effect size was 16.0% (95% CI: 14.0%-20.0%).
    UNASSIGNED: Because eating disorders put students\' safety and well-being at risk and because the health of early-stage physicians is vital to the welfare of a country, early signs of disordered eating must become a priority of medical schools and a signal for effective prevention and intervention. The recommendation is to ensure supportive environments, provide easy access to effective care, and hold clear expectations for student eating behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手术切除是治疗同步结直肠肝转移(CRLM)的金标准。原发肿瘤和转移性病变的切除可以遵循不同的顺序:“同时”,\"肠先\",和“肝脏优先”。保守的方法,如保留实质手术和节段切除术,可以作为主要肝切除术的替代方案。全面搜索Medline,认识论,Scopus,并进行了Cochrane图书馆。包括评估接受CRLM手术并报告生存结果的患者的研究。分析了其他次要结果,包括无病生存,围手术期并发症和死亡率,和复发率。使用AMSTAR-2方法进行质量评估。总生存率无显著差异,无病生存,和次要结局在同时与“肠-先”切除比较时观察到,尽管前一组的围手术期死亡率较高。与“肝脏优先”切除相比,同时切除的5年OS明显更高。比较“肝脏优先”和“肠道优先”切除时,OS和DFS没有显着差异,或解剖到非解剖切除。我们的综述验证了同时手术是治疗SCRLM的有效肿瘤方法,尽管围手术期发病率增加的风险凸显了选择合适患者的重要性。非解剖切除可能有利于保持肝功能,并使未来的手术干预。
    Surgical resection is the gold standard for treating synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The resection of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions can follow different sequences: \"simultaneous\", \"bowel-first\", and \"liver-first\". Conservative approaches, such as parenchymal-sparing surgery and segmentectomy, may serve as alternatives to major hepatectomy. A comprehensive search of Medline, Epistemonikos, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies evaluating patients who underwent surgery for CRLM and reported survival results were included. Other secondary outcomes were analyzed, including disease-free survival, perioperative complications and mortality, and recurrence rates. Quality assessment was performed using the AMSTAR-2 method. No significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, and secondary outcomes were observed when comparing simultaneous to \"bowel-first\" resections, despite a higher rate of perioperative mortality in the former group. The 5-year OS was significantly higher for simultaneous resection compared to \"liver-first\" resection. No significant differences in OS and DFS were noted when comparing \"liver-first\" to \"bowel-first\" resection, or anatomic to non-anatomic resection. Our umbrella review validates simultaneous surgery as an effective oncological approach for treating SCRLM, though the increased risk of perioperative morbidity highlights the importance of selecting suitable patients. Non-anatomic resections might be favored to preserve liver function and enable future surgical interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:生活在社会经济匮乏等不利条件下的女性,物质滥用,心理健康差,或者家庭暴力之前面临健康不平等,during,以及怀孕后和他们的婴儿一直到童年。妇女并不单独经历这些因素;它们积累和相互作用。因此,有必要概述在卫生和社会护理方面起作用的干预措施,并针对面临孕产妇或儿童健康不平等风险的妇女。
    方法:系统评价方法将用于确定来自高收入国家的系统评价,描述旨在减少怀孕期间经历社会劣势的妇女的不平等的干预措施。我们将描述干预措施的范围及其在减少母婴健康不平等方面的有效性。任何个人,医院,或孕前妇女特有的社区活动,产前,或产后1年后将包括在内,无论它们的交付设置如何。我们将使用预定的搜索策略搜索八个电子数据库,并通过广泛的灰色文献检索对其进行补充。我们将呈现一个叙事综合,考虑到纳入研究的质量评估和覆盖面。
    结论:母婴健康不平等是国家政策制定者的重点优先领域。了解围产期干预措施的范围和有效性将为政策和实践提供信息。确定证据中的差距将为未来的研究提供信息。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42023455502。
    BACKGROUND: Women who live with disadvantages such as socioeconomic deprivation, substance misuse, poor mental health, or domestic abuse face inequalities in health before, during, and after pregnancy and for their infants through to childhood. Women do not experience these factors alone; they accumulate and interact. Therefore, there is a need for an overview of interventions that work across health and social care and target women at risk of inequalities in maternal or child health.
    METHODS: Systematic review methodology will be used to identify systematic reviews from high-income countries that describe interventions aiming to reduce inequalities for women who experience social disadvantage during pregnancy. We will describe the range of interventions and their effectiveness in reducing inequalities in maternal or child health. Any individual, hospital, or community-level activity specific to women during the pre-conception, antenatal, or postpartum period up to 1 year after birth will be included, regardless of the setting in which they are delivered. We will search eight electronic databases with the pre-determined search strategy and supplement them with extensive grey literature searches. We will present a narrative synthesis, taking into account the quality assessment and coverage of included studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Inequalities in maternal and child health are a key priority area for national policymakers. Understanding the range and effectiveness of interventions across the perinatal period will inform policy and practice. Identifying gaps in the evidence will inform future research.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42023455502.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多荟萃分析已经探索了甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数与不同健康结果之间的关联,然而,对范围的全面评估,有效性,并且这些证据的质量仍然不完整。我们的目的是系统地审查和综合现有的TyG指数和健康结果的荟萃分析,并评估证据的质量。
    方法:彻底搜索PubMed,EMBASE,和WebofScience数据库从成立到2024年4月8日进行。我们使用评估系统评论的测量工具(AMSTAR)评估评论的质量,并使用建议分级评估证据的确定性。评估,开发和评估(等级)系统。本研究在PROSPERO注册(CRD:42024518587)。
    结果:总体而言,共纳入来自29个荟萃分析的95个关联,调查TyG指数与30项健康结果之间的关联。其中,根据随机效应模型,83(87.4%)个关联具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。基于AMSTAR工具,16项(55.2%)荟萃分析是高质量的,没有一项是低质量的。证据的确定性,由等级框架评估,显示有6个(6.3%)关联得到中等质量证据的支持。与TyG指数的最低类别相比,对比剂肾病(CIN)的风险[相对风险(RR)=2.25,95CI1.82,2.77],糖尿病患者(RR=1.26,95CI1.18,1.33)或急性冠脉综合征患者(RR=1.56,95CI1.06,2.28)的卒中风险,冠状动脉疾病(CAD)-非致死性MI的预后(RR=2.02,95CI1.32,3.10),冠状动脉狭窄(RR=3.49,95CI1.71,7.12)和多血管CAD(RR=2.33,95CI1.59,3.42)的严重程度随高TyG指数而增加。
    结论:我们发现TyG指数与许多疾病呈正相关,包括CIN和卒中的风险,CAD的预后,和CAD的严重程度得到中等质量证据的支持。TyG指数可能有助于识别患有这些疾病的高风险人群。
    BACKGROUND: Numerous meta-analyses have explored the association between the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and diverse health outcomes, yet the comprehensive assessment of the scope, validity, and quality of this evidence remains incomplete. Our aim was to systematically review and synthesise existing meta-analyses of TyG index and health outcomes and to assess the quality of the evidence.
    METHODS: A thorough search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted from their inception through to 8 April 2024. We assessed the quality of reviews using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD: 42024518587).
    RESULTS: Overall, a total of 95 associations from 29 meta-analyses were included, investigating associations between TyG index and 30 health outcomes. Of these, 83 (87.4%) associations were statistically significant (P < 0.05) according to the random effects model. Based on the AMSTAR tool, 16 (55.2%) meta-analyses were high quality and none was low quality. The certainty of the evidence, assessed by the GRADE framework, showed that 6 (6.3%) associations were supported by moderate-quality evidence. When compared with the lowest category of the TyG index, the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) [relative risk (RR) = 2.25, 95%CI 1.82, 2.77], the risk of stroke in patients with diabetes mellitus (RR = 1.26, 95%CI 1.18, 1.33) or with acute coronary syndrome disease (RR = 1.56, 95%CI 1.06, 2.28), the prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD)-non-fatal MI (RR = 2.02, 95%CI 1.32, 3.10), and the severity of CAD including coronary artery stenosis (RR = 3.49, 95%CI 1.71, 7.12) and multi-vessel CAD (RR = 2.33, 95%CI 1.59, 3.42) increased with high TyG index.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found that the TyG index was positively associated with many diseases including the risk of CIN and stroke, the prognosis of CAD, and the severity of CAD which were supported by moderate-quality evidence. TyG index might be useful to identify people at high-risk for developing these diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号