BACKGROUND: High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection has been increasingly recognized as a risk factor for sinonasal tract carcinomas. However the prevalence and prognostic significance of HPV-associated sinonasal carcinomas is not well known due to limited studies and inconsistency in HPV testing modalities in literatures. Morphologically, HPV-associated sinonasal carcinomas encompass a diverse group of tumors. HPV-associated sinonasal adenocarcinoma has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, morphologic spectrum and prognostic implication of HPV-associated sinonasal carcinomas.
METHODS: This cohort included 153 sinonasal carcinomas. Tissue microarrays were constructed. P16 immunohistochemistry and HR-HPV E6/7 in-situ Hybridization (ISH) were performed. Carcinomas were deemed HPV-associated based on a positive ISH testing. Clinicopathologic data was collected.
RESULTS: 28/153 (18%) sinonasal carcinomas were HPV-associated. HPV-associated carcinomas consisted of 26 (93%) squamous cell carcinomas and variants, 1 (3.5%) HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma and 1 (3.5%) adenocarcinoma. The HPV-associated adenocarcinoma closely resembled HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma morphologically. HPV-associated carcinomas occurred in 8 (29%) women and 20 (71%) men with a median age of 66 years old. HPV-associated carcinomas were predominantly located at nasal cavity. A trend toward improved overall survival and progression free survival in HPV-associated carcinomas patients was observed, yet without statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies a novel HPV-associated sinonasal adenocarcinoma subtype, highlights the broad morphologic spectrum of HPV-associated sinonasal carcinomas, and supports routine p16 testing during pathology practice regardless of tumor subtype followed by a confirmatory HR-HPV testing. This practice is critical for studying the clinical behavior of HPV-associated sinonasal carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters in distinguishing sinonasal lymphoma from sinonasal carcinoma.
METHODS: Forty-two participants with histologically confirmed sinonasal lymphomas and fifty-two cases of sinonasal carcinoma underwent imaging with a 3.0T MRI scanner. DCE-MRI and DWI were conducted, and various parameters including type of time-intensity curve(TIC), time to peak, peak enhancement, peak contrast enhancement, washout rate, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and relative ADC were measured. Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to assess the diagnostic capability of individual and combined indices for differentiating nasal sinus lymphoma from nasal sinus carcinoma.
RESULTS: Sinonasal lymphoma predominantly exhibited type II TIC(n = 20), whereas sinonasal carcinoma predominantly exhibited type III TIC(n = 23). Significant differences were observed in all parameters except washout ratio (p < 0.05), and ADC value emerged as the most reliable diagnostic tool in single parameter. Combined DCE-MRI parameters demonstrated superior diagnostic efficacy compared to individual parameters, with the highest efficiency (area under curve = 0.945) achieved when combining all parameters of DCE-MRI and DWI.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric evaluation involving contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI and DWI holds considerable diagnostic value in distinguishing sinonasal lymphoma from sinonasal carcinoma.

SMARCB1 is a gene known to cause carcinogenesis in many soft tissue tumors, including malignant rhabdoid tumors and epithelioid sarcoma. Since the first report of a subtype of sinonasal carcinoma characterized by a deficiency of the SMARCB1 gene in 2014 to date, fewer than 200 cases have been reported. We report a case of SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma with clear cell morphology. In our case, there are no evident basaloid or plasmacytoid/rhabdoid tumor cells, which are typical histopathological features of SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma. SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is prone to recurrence and has a very poor prognosis. As the development of molecularly targeted agents progresses, therapeutic efficacy is expected to improve. Simultaneously, the importance of early and accurate diagnosis of SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma will increase. With the limited information provided by biopsy specimens, it is necessary to confirm the loss of SMARCB1 expression by immunohistochemistry and investigate the presence of SMARCB1 gene deletion by molecular genetics, considering the possibility of SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma even in atypical cases without basaloid or plasmacytoid/rhabdoid cell morphology, as in our case.

A 77-year-old-man with arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus type II presented at our clinic for a routine ophthalmological exam. He complained of intermittent double vision. The ophthalmic examination revealed paralysis of III (n. oculomotorius) and VI (n. abducens) cranial nerves with ptosis, deficit in elevation and abduction of the left eye. The patient underwent urgent MRI imaging of the brain/orbits and paranasal sinuses, and urgent neurological assessment. MRI revealed a volume-occupying process, starting from the posterior wall of the left maxillary sinus with perineural diffusion and involvement of the homolateral trigeminal nerve, intracranial spread in the medial cranial fossa and involvement of the cavernous, sphenoidal sinuses and the orbital apex on the left side. Biopsy was performed, and the histology resulted in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma with intracranial spread.

OBJECTIVE: To present a case report of sinonasal glomangiopericytoma (GPC) in a female patient in her thirties and to highlight the importance of collecting pathology specimens even in routine sinus surgery cases.
METHODS: A case report detailing the diagnosis of GPC in a female in her thirties, including her initial presentation, treatment, and follow-up, along with a brief review of the literature.
RESULTS: Pathology of the collected specimen revealed sinonasal GPC along with chronic rhinosinusitis. Immunohistochemistry was positive for SMA, beta-catenin, and cyclin D1; and negative for STAT6, ERG, pankeratin, SOX10, and S100.
CONCLUSIONS: This diagnosis expands the knowledge around the demographic profile of GPC patients. GPC should be included in the differential diagnosis of sinonasal masses, even in younger patients. The case highlights the importance of collecting the entire pathology specimen in all cases, even of ones that seem routine and benign.

Classification of tumors of the head and neck has evolved in recent decades including a widespread application of molecular testing in tumors of the sinonasal tract, salivary glands, and soft tissues with a predilection for the head and neck. The availability of new molecular techniques has allowed for the definition of multiple novel tumor types unique to head and neck sites. Moreover, an expanding spectrum of immunohistochemical markers specific to genetic alterations facilitates rapid identification of diagnostic molecular abnormalities. As such, it is currently possible for head and neck pathologists to benefit from a molecularly defined tumor classification while making diagnoses that are still based largely on histopathology and immunohistochemistry. This review covers the principal molecular alterations in sinonasal malignancies, such as alterations in DEK, AFF2, NUTM1, IDH1-2, and SWI/SNF genes in particular, that are important from a practical standpoint for diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of response to treatment.

UNASSIGNED: Sinonasal hamartomas, according to the 5th edition of the World Health Organisation classification of head and neck tumours are divided into respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH), seromucinous hamartoma and chondromesenchymal hamartoma. Seromucinous hamartoma are benign proliferations of small eosinophilic glands surrounded by fibrous stroma and cuboidal cells. Hamartomas of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are rare entities, clinically presenting as sinonasal polyposis.
UNASSIGNED: A 79- year-old female patient was referred to our emergency room due to severe dyspnea. Anterior rhinoscopy revealed unilateral greyish polypoid mass obstructing the middle, inferior and common nasal meatus. Systemic corticosteroids and oxygen therapy were administered under observation. Computerized tomographic imaging of the paranasal sinuses with contrast on all three planes showed an opacified polypoid mass in all meatus and the maxillary, anterior ethmoidal and sphenoidal sinus posteriorly extending to the choanae. On the coronal plane a widening of the olfactory clefts about 12 mm was described. FESS visualized that the polypoid mass originated from the posterior septum and extended to all meatus anteriorly and to the choanae posteriorly. The polypoid lesion was endoscopically completely excised. Histopathological analysis revealed a seromucinous hamartoma.
UNASSIGNED: Seromucinous hamartoma are rare benign tumors of the sinonasal region with potential of malignant alteration. Unfortunately, they share symptoms and clinical appearance with other benign conditions of the sinonasal region. Therefore, it is even more important to consider them as a differential diagnose.

Glomangiopericytoma (GPC) is a rare benign sinonasal tumor originating from Zimmerman\'s Pericytes surrounding capillaries and accounting for less than 0.05% of all sinonasal tumors. Glomangiopericytoma has low malignant potential (5-10%) and is mostly diagnosed in the 6th or 7th decade of age with slight female preponderance. We presented here a case series of 5 patients with sinonasal GPC. This research was conducted at a tertiary healthcare centre in North India. In our case series, all the patients were evaluated and underwent endoscopic surgical resection. All patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and preoperative embolization. The coblation technique used for haemostasis proved very effective and time-saving. All patients exhibited cytoplasmic SMA positivity (a marker of GPC) and CD34 negativity, while one patient exhibited a high Ki-67 index (> 10%), which is a predictor of aggressive tumor behavior. None of the patients showed any recurrence in follow-up. We recommend performing complete endoscopic surgical excision to prevent recurrence. The use of DSA, preoperative embolization, and intraoperative use of the coblation technique provides a cleaner surgical field and reduced operating time.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal adenocarcinoma accounts for less than 0.1-4% of all malignancies in the region. It is common among woodworkers and leather workers. Sinonasal adenocarcinoma usually arises from the ethmoid sinus (40%) or nasal cavity (25%). Extension to nearby structures is common, but intracranial spread is very rare. These tumors are usually treated with surgery, with a reported 5-year survival rate of 59% to 80%.
METHODS: This is a 60-year-old Black African male patient who presented with globalized headache, nasal obstruction with snoring during sleep, anosmia, change in mentation, sometimes agitation and left-side visual loss of one-year duration with worsening his above symptoms over the last one month. He couldn\'t smell soap bilaterally; in his left eye he could see only hand movement at nearly 30 cm. On brain magnetic resonance imaging, there was a T1 hypo- and T2 hyper-intense anterior cranial fossa mass arising from the left ethmoid sinuses and sphenoid sinuses and compressing the left optic structures, and brain computed tomography demonstrated heterogeneous hypo- to isodense mass. Complete tumor excision achieved and discharged with significant improvement and linked to oncology unit for radiotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The management of these patients is multidisciplinary, involving neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, oncologists, and maxillofacial surgeons. Surgical resection is the main treatment strategy, followed by radiotherapy, particularly intensity-modulated therapy. Chemotherapy is used in highly advanced, metastatic, and unresectable tumors.

BACKGROUND: Poorly differentiated sinonasal small round cell tumors (SRCTs) are rare and heterogeneous, posing challenges in diagnosis and treatment.
METHODS: Recent advances in molecular findings and diagnostic refinement have promoted better understanding and management of these tumors.
RESULTS: The newly defined and emerging sinonasal entities demonstrate diverse morphologies, specific genomic signatures, and clinical behavior from conventional counterparts. In this review of SRCTs, emphasis is placed on the diagnostic approach with the employment of a pertinent panel of immunohistochemistry studies and/or molecular tests, fine-tuned to the latest WHO 5 classification of sinonasal/paranasal tumors and personalized treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Specifically, this review focuses on tumors with epithelial and neuroectodermal derivation.