BACKGROUND: Surgical penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) procedures have only recently been introduced to mainland China, with the overall number of such procedures having been conducted to date remaining relatively low. Accordingly, relatively little remains known with respect to the annual trends in PPI. Accordingly, this study was developed with the goal of clarifying these trends across different hospitals in mainland China, while also providing a single-center overview of post-PPI patient outcomes.
RESULTS: To identify males in mainland China who had undergone PPI, a retrospective review of data from January 2019 - October 2023 was conducted. This approach revealed an increase in the total PPI caseload from 120 in 2019 to 413 within the first 10 months of 2023. Over this same interval, the number of surgeons performing PPI rose from 33 to 74. A retrospective review of the 112 patients who had undergone PPI at Shanghai General Hospital from 2019-2023 revealed that these patients had a median age of 39 [27-63] years, and PPI treatment led to a significant increase in median International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) scores from a baseline value of 10.23 ± 1.26 to a post-treatment value of 22.6 ± 2.73. The underlying causes of erectile dysfunction for these patients included vasculogenic factors (58/112; 51.8%), diabetes mellitus (21/112; 18.8%), and injuries to the spinal cord or pelvis (14/112; 12.5%). The overall rates of satisfaction with the PPI reported by patients and their partners were 93.0% and 90.4%, respectively, and the 3-year PPI survival rate for this cohort was 87%.
CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight a rising trend in the number of PPI being performed in China, with these steadily increasing rates since 2019 emphasizing the increasingly high levels of acceptance of this procedure by patients and clinicians as a means of treating erectile dysfunction. However, the expertise is restricted to a small number of surgeons. Even so, it is a safe and efficacious approach to managing severe erectile dysfunction for patients in China, and when performed by experienced surgeons based on standardized protocols, low complication rates can be achieved while providing patients and their sexual partners with high levels of satisfaction.
RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Les procédures chirurgicales d’implantation de prothèses péniennes (IPP) n’ont été que récemment introduites en Chine continentale, le nombre total de procédures de ce type ayant été effectuées à ce jour restant relativement faible. On ne sait donc encore que relativement peu de choses sur les tendances annuelles de l’IPP. La présente étude a été développée dans le but de clarifier ces tendances dans différents hôpitaux de Chine continentale, tout en fournissant une vue d’ensemble des résultats des patients post-IPP dans un seul centre. RéSULTATS: Afin d’identifier les hommes de Chine continentale qui avaient subi un IPP, une recherche rétrospective des données a été effectuée de janvier 2019 à octobre 2023. Cette approche a révélé une augmentation du nombre total de cas d’IPP de 120 en 2019 à 413 au cours des 10 premiers mois de 2023. Au cours de cette même période, le nombre de chirurgiens pratiquant des IPP est passé de 33 à 74. L’étude rétrospective des 112 patients qui avaient subi un IPP à l’hôpital général de Shanghai de 2019 à 2023 a révélé qu’ ils avaient un âge médian de 39 [27–63] ans, et que le traitement par IPP a entraîné une augmentation significative des scores médians de l’indice international de la fonction érectile-5, qui sont passés d’une valeur de base de 10,2 ± 1,3 à une valeur post-traitement de 22,6 ± 2,7. Les causes sous-jacentes de la dysfonction érectile chez ces patients comprenaient des facteurs vasculogéniques (58/112; 51,8%), un diabète (21/112; 18,8%) et des lésions de la moelle épinière ou du bassin (14/112; 12,5%). Les taux globaux de satisfaction à l’égard de l’IPP, rapportés par les patients et leurs partenaires, étaient respectivement de 93,0% et 90,4%, et le taux de survie à 3 ans de l’IPP dans cette cohorte était de 87%. CONCLUSION: Ces données mettent en évidence une tendance à la hausse du nombre d’IPP pratiquées en Chine; ces taux en constante augmentation depuis 2019 soulignent les niveaux de plus en plus élevés d’acceptation de cette procédure par les patients et les cliniciens comme moyen de traitement de la dysfonction érectile. Cependant, l’expertise est limitée à un petit nombre de chirurgiens. Malgré cela, il s’agit d’une approche sûre et efficace pour gérer la dysfonction érectile sévère pour les patients en Chine, et lorsqu’elle est effectuée par des chirurgiens expérimentés sur la base de protocoles standardisés, de faibles taux de complications peuvent être atteints tout en offrant aux patients et à leurs partenaires sexuels des niveaux élevés de satisfaction.

Intestinal subepithelial lesions are often encountered during endoscopy. Etiologies can include lesions intrinsic or extrinsic to the gastrointestinal wall. They can present a diagnostic dilemma as simple mucosal biopsies are often nondiagnostic. The combination of characteristic radiographic, endoscopic, and endosonographic features can aid in a definitive diagnosis precluding the need for unnecessary tissue sampling of extrinsic compressive etiologies. The location of the space of Retzius which is the traditional site of penile prosthetic pump reservoir insertion can predispose to cecal compression. We present a rare case of a penile prosthetic pump reservoir presenting as a cecal subepithelial mass on endoscopy.

Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is an effective treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), but infections pose a significant threat to its success. Current guidelines lack antifungal recommendations, despite rising fungal infection rates post-IPP surgery. This review examines epidemiology, risk factors (including diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, and obesity), and pathogenesis, highlighting the role of biofilm formation in device contamination. Clinical manifestations vary from acute to delayed, with fungal biofilms presenting challenges in diagnosis. Prophylactic strategies, including broad-spectrum antibiotics and antifungals, are crucial, with evidence suggesting a 92% reduction in infections. With fungal infections showing lower salvage rates, management involves culture-guided treatment, irrigation, and oral antibiotics. Future research aims to understand biofilm mechanisms and develop biomaterials to reduce infection rates. Implementing antifungal therapy, along with standard practices like the no-touch technique and antibiotic dips, is crucial in preventing IPP infections.

Penile prosthesis implantation is an effective treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) with high patient satisfaction and effectiveness. Unfortunately, infections remain a dreaded complication, often necessitating device removal and imposing a substantial healthcare cost. Biofilms are communities of microorganisms encased in a self-produced polymeric matrix that can attach to penile prostheses. Biofilms have been demonstrated on the majority of explanted prostheses for both infectious and non-infectious revisions and are prevalent even in asymptomatic patients. Biofilms play a role in microbial persistence and exhibit unique antibiotic resistance strategies that can lead to increased infection rates in revision surgery. Biofilms demonstrate physical barriers through the development of an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) that hinders antibiotic penetrance and the bacteria within biofilms demonstrate reduced metabolic activity that weakens the efficacy of traditional antibiotics. Despite these challenges, new methods are being developed and investigated to prevent and treat biofilms. These treatments include surface modifications, biosurfactants, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and nitric oxide (NO) to prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Additionally, novel antibiotic treatments are currently under investigation and include antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), bacteriophages, and refillable antibiotic coatings. This article reviews biofilm formation, the challenges that biofilms present to conventional antibiotics, current treatments, and experimental approaches for biofilm prevention and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Penile prosthesis implantation is the last resort for refractory erectile dysfunction. Reservoir placement is one of the biggest challenges in inflatable penile prosthesis implant surgery in several cases, especially in patients with abnormal pelvic anatomy. Ectopic reservoir placement with supramuscular approach has many advantages in these cases.
RESULTS: No complications were encountered except wound site infection in 2 patients which could be controlled with antibiotic treatment. EDITS scores were not statistically different between patients divided into 2-year groups according to follow-up time. Median values of EDITS scores were high in all groups, suggesting that couples had high sexual satisfaction both in the long term and in the short term.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend placement of the supramuscular tube and reservoir through the incision described, especially in patients whose pelvic anatomy has been modified by lower abdominal surgery.
RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: L’implantation d’une prothèse pénienne est le dernier recours pour les dysfonctions érectiles réfractaires. La mise en place d’un réservoir est l’un des plus grands défis de la chirurgie d’implant de prothèse pénienne gonflable dans de nombreux cas, en particulier chez les patientes présentant une anatomie pelvienne anormale. RéSULTATS: Aucune complication n’a été rencontrée, à l’exception d’une infection du site de la plaie chez 2 patients, qui a pu être contrôlée par un traitement antibiotique. Les scores du questionnaire EDITS ne furent pas statistiquement différents entre les patients classés en groupes de 2 ans en fonction du temps de suivi. Les valeurs médianes des scores du questionnaire EDITS étaient élevées dans tous les groupes, ce qui suggère que les couples avaient une satisfaction sexuelle élevée à la fois à court et à long termes. CONCLUSIONS: Nous recommandons la mise en place du tube supramusculaire et du réservoir à travers l’incision décrite, en particulier chez les patients dont l’anatomie pelvienne a été antérieurement modifiée par une chirurgie abdominale basse.

UNASSIGNED: Implantation of a penile prosthesis is a reliable option for men with erectile dysfunction (ED) refractory to less invasive therapies. While the frequency of penile prosthesis infections have decreased, they remain a devastating complication. Herein we discuss why immediate salvage surgery is an essential technique for the management of implant infections. We will also describe the relevant advancements to this technique.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a narrative review via computer based search of PubMed for all relevant articles on penile prosthesis infection management, including guidelines, case series, reviews, and expert opinions. Search terms used included: \"inflatable penile prosthesis\", \"IPP\", \"penile prosthesis\", \"salvage\", \"treatment\", \"delayed\", \"immediate\". Only English peer-reviewed publications were included.
UNASSIGNED: Historically, patients who presented with penile prosthesis infections were exclusively managed with complete removal of the prosthesis without replacement. Although this strategy is safe, it hastens immediate ED and corporal fibrosis, resulting in loss of penile length and increased difficulty with subsequent prosthesis replacement. Previous case series have reported successful treatment of localized penile prosthesis infections with nonsurgical treatment, but the role of conservative treatment remains limited. The current standard of immediate salvage entails removal of the infected prosthesis and washout followed by immediate replacement with a new penile prosthesis. This technique has been demonstrated to be safe and effective, thus allowing patients to resume intercourse and maintain penile length.
UNASSIGNED: Immediate salvage surgery is safe and effective, and has emerged as the preferred strategy for the management of most patients with a penile prosthesis infection.

OBJECTIVE: About 10% of Peyronie\'s patients are complex cases with severe curvature (>60 degrees), ventral plaque, multiplanar curvature, hour-glass/hinge deformity, notching deformity, and ossified plaque. In patients with complex Peyronie\'s disease (PD), different techniques (shortening procedures, lengthening procedures, and penile prosthesis implantation (IPP)) may be necessary to achieve successful result. This review aims to analyze the various surgical techniques employed in the management of Peyronie\'s disease, with a specific focus on patients with complex deformity.
METHODS: Articles focusing on the surgical management of complex curvature in Peyronie\'s disease were searched in MEDLINE and PubMed published between 1990 and 2023.
RESULTS: Shortening procedures are linked to penile shortening and are not recommended for complex cases such as notching, hour-glass deformity, or ossified plaque. Lengthening procedures are suitable for addressing complex curvatures without erectile dysfunction (ED) and are a more appropriate method for multiplanar curvatures. Penile prosthesis implantation (IPP), with or without additional procedures, is the gold standard for patients with ED and Peyronie\'s disease. IPP should also be the preferred option for cases of penile instability (hinge deformity) and has shown high satisfaction rates in all complex cases.
CONCLUSIONS: While surgical interventions for complex curvature in Peyronie\'s disease carry inherent risks, careful patient selection, meticulous surgical techniques, and post-operative care can help minimize complications and maximize positive outcome.

BACKGROUND: Chronic post-penile prosthesis pain is de novo pain persisting > 2 months post-operatively. This pain is inadequately reported, poorly understood and undermanaged. The purpose of this current pilot study was to improvise a medical approach to alleviate the condition and assess the combination of Pregabalin and Amitriptyline in its management.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 9 patients complaining of idiopathic penile, pelvic, or scrotal pain persisting > 2 months after penile prosthesis implantation. Patients were prescribed pregabalin 75mg/12h (escalated after 1 week to 150mg/12h upon demand) and Amitriptyline 25mg once daily for 3 months. The pain was reassessed after 10, 30 and 100 days. The dose of pregabalin required and the side effects of the medication were noted. Findings revealed a significant decrease in pain duration (p = 0.007), frequency (p < 0.001), and intensity (p < 0.001); in glanular (p = 0.008), shaft pain (p = 0.046) but not scrotal (p = 0.112). Moreover, a significant decrease was found in sharp pain (p = 0.003) and pain aggravated by touch (p = 0.008) but not aching pain (p = 0.277). Additionally, significant improvement was reported in QoL (p < 0.001) and dose escalation of pregabalin to 150mg/12h was required in only 1 case (11%).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pregabalin and amitriptyline is very effective in the management of chronic idiopathic pain following penile prosthesis implantation. However, due to the ambiguity and lack of reporting of the condition, we recommend a multicentric contribution to acknowledge the condition, and weigh its prevalence accurately, whilst evaluating the efficacy of our approach. This study received ethical approval from Ain Shams University Research Ethics Committee (REC) FWA 000017585, on 04/13/2023 (REC-FMASU@med.asu.edu.eg).
BACKGROUND: no FMASU R98/2023.
RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La douleur chronique survenant après l’implantation d’une prothèse pénienne est une douleur de novo qui persiste plus de 2 mois après la chirurgie. Cette douleur est mal rapportée, mal comprise et mal gérée. L’objectif de cette étude pilote était d’improviser une approche médicale pour soulager cette douleur, et d’évaluer l’association de la prégabaline et de l’amitriptyline dans sa prise en charge. RéSULTATS: L’étude a inclut 9 patients se plaignant de douleurs idiopathiques au pénis, au bassin ou au scrotum, persistantes depuis plus de 2 mois après l’implantation d’une prothèse pénienne. Les patients se sont vu prescrire 75 mg/12 h de prégabaline (augmenté après 1 semaine à 150 mg/12 h sur demande) et 25 mg d’amitriptyline une fois par jour, pendant 3 mois. La douleur a été réévaluée après 10, 30 et 100 jours. La dose de prégabaline requise et les effets secondaires du médicament ont été notés. Les résultats ont montré une diminution significative de la durée de la douleur (p = 0,007), de sa fréquence (p < 0,001) et de son intensité (p < 0,001), au niveau du gland (p = 0,008), de la verge (p = 0,046) mais pas du scrotum (p = 0,112). De plus, une diminution significative a été observée en ce qui concerne la douleur vive (p = 0,003) et la douleur aggravée par le toucher (p = 0,008), mais pas la douleur aigüe (p = 0,277). Enfin, une amélioration significative de la qualité de vie (p < 0,001) a été rapportée et l’augmentation de la dose de prégabaline à 150 mg/12 h ne s’est avéré nécessaire que dans 1 cas (11 %). CONCLUSION: L’association de la prégabaline et de l’amitriptyline est très efficace dans la prise en charge de la douleur chronique idiopathique suite à l’implantation d’une prothèse pénienne. Cependant, en raison de l’ambiguïté et de l’absence de déclaration de la maladie, nous recommandons la mise en place d’une contribution multicentrique pour reconnaître la maladie et évaluer sa prévalence avec précision, tout en évaluant l’efficacité de notre approche. Cette étude a reçu l’approbation éthique du Comité d’éthique de la recherche (CER) de l’Université Ain Shams 44 FWA 000017585, le 13/04/2023 (REC46 FMASU@med.asu.edu.eg). N° D’ENREGISTREMENT DE L’ESSAI: FMASU R98/2023.

This article provides a comprehensive discussion of 3-piece inflatable penile implant surgery when performed through an infrapubic approach in patients presenting with challenging anatomy or corporal fibrosis. The infrapubic approach is one of the primary approaches for inflatable device placement with excellent long-term functional outcomes. While the literature is rich in descriptions of infrapubic placement in the primary, uncomplicated setting, its role in the management of complex patients presenting to centers of excellence is less elucidated. In uncomplicated cases, the infrapubic approach offers several theoretical advantages including shorter operative time and quicker return to sexual function. In addition to describing specific details of our infrapubic technique and perioperative management, I discuss scenarios in which an infrapubic approach may allow for better exposure for correction of dorsal deformity, facilitate secondary surgical maneuvers such as suprapubic lipectomy, or protect existing incontinence prosthetics already in place. Specific technique and surgical pearls from our prosthetic center of excellence are reviewed for each of these challenging scenarios. Ultimately, prosthetic surgeons should be adept at placing, revising, and removing devices through both approaches so that various forms of anatomical deformity and device failures can be addressed proficiently. In addition to my own clinical reflections, a critical review was performed using the Medline database to support our statements.

Penile prosthesis surgery is a definitive treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The two categories of penile prosthesis are endorsed by professional guidelines, inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and malleable penile prosthesis (MPP). Each modality of penile prosthesis offers distinct advantages and incorporates specific design features, allowing for personalized device selection that aligns with individual needs and preferences. While the overall complication rate of penile implant surgery remains low, surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for complications in the perioperative time period. Multimodal analgesic regimens including nerve blocks and narcotic-free pathways should be administered to manage perioperative pain. Finally, the high patient satisfaction after penile prosthesis surgery underscores the success of this ED treatment option.