BACKGROUND: Chronic post-penile prosthesis pain is de novo pain persisting > 2 months post-operatively. This pain is inadequately reported, poorly understood and undermanaged. The purpose of this current pilot study was to improvise a medical approach to alleviate the condition and assess the combination of Pregabalin and Amitriptyline in its management.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 9 patients complaining of idiopathic penile, pelvic, or scrotal pain persisting > 2 months after penile prosthesis implantation. Patients were prescribed pregabalin 75mg/12h (escalated after 1 week to 150mg/12h upon demand) and Amitriptyline 25mg once daily for 3 months. The pain was reassessed after 10, 30 and 100 days. The dose of pregabalin required and the side effects of the medication were noted. Findings revealed a significant decrease in pain duration (p = 0.007), frequency (p < 0.001), and intensity (p < 0.001); in glanular (p = 0.008), shaft pain (p = 0.046) but not scrotal (p = 0.112). Moreover, a significant decrease was found in sharp pain (p = 0.003) and pain aggravated by touch (p = 0.008) but not aching pain (p = 0.277). Additionally, significant improvement was reported in QoL (p < 0.001) and dose escalation of pregabalin to 150mg/12h was required in only 1 case (11%).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pregabalin and amitriptyline is very effective in the management of chronic idiopathic pain following penile prosthesis implantation. However, due to the ambiguity and lack of reporting of the condition, we recommend a multicentric contribution to acknowledge the condition, and weigh its prevalence accurately, whilst evaluating the efficacy of our approach. This study received ethical approval from Ain Shams University Research Ethics Committee (REC) FWA 000017585, on 04/13/2023 (REC-FMASU@med.asu.edu.eg).
BACKGROUND: no FMASU R98/2023.
RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La douleur chronique survenant après l’implantation d’une prothèse pénienne est une douleur de novo qui persiste plus de 2 mois après la chirurgie. Cette douleur est mal rapportée, mal comprise et mal gérée. L’objectif de cette étude pilote était d’improviser une approche médicale pour soulager cette douleur, et d’évaluer l’association de la prégabaline et de l’amitriptyline dans sa prise en charge. RéSULTATS: L’étude a inclut 9 patients se plaignant de douleurs idiopathiques au pénis, au bassin ou au scrotum, persistantes depuis plus de 2 mois après l’implantation d’une prothèse pénienne. Les patients se sont vu prescrire 75 mg/12 h de prégabaline (augmenté après 1 semaine à 150 mg/12 h sur demande) et 25 mg d’amitriptyline une fois par jour, pendant 3 mois. La douleur a été réévaluée après 10, 30 et 100 jours. La dose de prégabaline requise et les effets secondaires du médicament ont été notés. Les résultats ont montré une diminution significative de la durée de la douleur (p = 0,007), de sa fréquence (p < 0,001) et de son intensité (p < 0,001), au niveau du gland (p = 0,008), de la verge (p = 0,046) mais pas du scrotum (p = 0,112). De plus, une diminution significative a été observée en ce qui concerne la douleur vive (p = 0,003) et la douleur aggravée par le toucher (p = 0,008), mais pas la douleur aigüe (p = 0,277). Enfin, une amélioration significative de la qualité de vie (p < 0,001) a été rapportée et l’augmentation de la dose de prégabaline à 150 mg/12 h ne s’est avéré nécessaire que dans 1 cas (11 %). CONCLUSION: L’association de la prégabaline et de l’amitriptyline est très efficace dans la prise en charge de la douleur chronique idiopathique suite à l’implantation d’une prothèse pénienne. Cependant, en raison de l’ambiguïté et de l’absence de déclaration de la maladie, nous recommandons la mise en place d’une contribution multicentrique pour reconnaître la maladie et évaluer sa prévalence avec précision, tout en évaluant l’efficacité de notre approche. Cette étude a reçu l’approbation éthique du Comité d’éthique de la recherche (CER) de l’Université Ain Shams 44 FWA 000017585, le 13/04/2023 (REC46 FMASU@med.asu.edu.eg). N° D’ENREGISTREMENT DE L’ESSAI: FMASU R98/2023.

OBJECTIVE: Among the many treatments for erectile dysfunction, implantation of a penile prosthesis has been associated with high patient satisfaction rates. However, patients with coexistent Peyronie\'s disease (PD) and refractory erectile dysfunction and/or severe deformities may show different results. The aim of our study was to assess and to compare the level of satisfaction, with an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP), in men with/without coexistent PD.
METHODS: A survey study based on a five-item satisfaction questionnaire was submitted to all those live patients implanted in the period 1992-2022 at our center (n=570) and their partners. Ninety-two percent of implants were inflatable devices. Surgeries were mainly performed by two surgeons. The main outcome measure used was the level of patient and partner satisfaction with sexual intercourse after IPP.
RESULTS: Of the 570 eligible patients, 479 (84%) completed the survey (393 Non-PD: GROUP 1; 70 non-complex PD-Group 2; 16 complex PD). Eighty-six per cent of patients in Group 1 reported satisfactory sexual intercourse (very or moderately satisfied). Non-complex PD implanted patients (Group 2) reported a global 81% satisfactory sexual intercourse (very or moderately satisfied) (p>0.05). However, when we evaluated the PD subgroup of patients with severe PD who require incision/excision/grafting at the time of implant (Group 3: n=20), only 61% reported satisfactory sexual intercourse (p<0.01) with predominance of moderately satisfied patients over very satisfied: 78% vs. 22%). Additionally, 84% (Group 1), 80% (Group 2) and 54% (Group 3) of partners reported satisfactory intercourses, respectively (p<0.01). Overall, 84% of Group 1 implants and 79% of Group 2 reported that they would undergo the procedure again if the IPP failed (p>0.05; ns). Only 50% of Group 3 patients would do it again. With regard to cosmetic aspects, 48% of the Group 3 implant reported penile shortness or soft glans as the main causes of their dissatisfaction. Only 2.4% of total PP patients expressed difficulty in manipulating the device.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of PD alone may not impact PP patient and partner satisfaction, but patients with more severe baseline deformity who require incision/grafting may be less satisfied with outcomes including penile length and glans sensation.

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive infrapubic approach (MIIA) for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement has shown favorable peri-operative safety and efficacy profile, but scarce data exist on long-term follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the safety and efficacy of IPP implantation via the MIIA after a minimum 5-year follow-up.
METHODS: We identified data of implanted patients prospectively included in our institutional database. Complications and functional outcomes were assessed by using validated tools. Specifically, quality of life and patient satisfaction were evaluated by the Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) questionnaire. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze IPP survival (defined as a working IPP).
RESULTS: Overall, 67 patients implanted by MIIA with a median (IQR) age of 64 years (61-70) were included. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 71 months (63-80). Fifteen (22%) patients experienced complications: minor (Clavien ≤2) events included changes in penile sensitivity (n = 1; 1.5%), orgasmic dysfunction (n = 1; 1.5%), pain (n = 5; 7%), urinary tract infection (n = 2; 3%), and chronic discomfort (n = 1; 1.5%); major (Clavien 3) complications were represented by mechanical failure (n = 3; 4.5%), IPP infection (n = 1; 1.5%), and cylinder protrusion (n = 1; 1.5%). The estimated IPP survival was 94% (95% CI, 91.4-96.6), 92.5% (95% CI, 89.7-95.3), and 92.5% (95% CI, 89.7-95.3) at 3, 5, and 7 years after implantation, respectively. In patients using the device at follow-up (n = 61; 91%), median (IQR) scores for QoLSPP domains demonstrated favorable functional outcomes and patient satisfaction: functional 21 (19-23), personal 16 (15-18), relational 14 (12-15), and social 12 (11-14).
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the longest follow-up using validated tools to assess the outcomes of IPP implantation via MIIA so far. IPP placement via MIIA confirms to be safe and to offer high satisfaction to both patients and partners at mid-term evaluation.

The utility of penile suspensory ligament release (SLR) in the setting of penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) has received limited attention in the literature.
To assess the efficacy and safety of penile SLR release, pubic lipectomy (PL), and the utility of penopubic Z-plasty (ZP) during malleable PPI in improving sexual satisfaction compared to that achieved with the conventional method.
Between August 2018 and April 2020, 61 patients with refractory erectile dysfunction were prospectively randomized into 2 groups; group A included 31 patients who underwent PPI with SLR and PL via ZP, and group B included 30 patients who underwent conventional PPI via a penoscrotal incision.
Penile length was assessed at 3 months, and sexual satisfaction was assessed up to 1 year after PPI using both validated and non-validated tools.
The median operative time was higher in group A than in group B (170 min; interquartile range [IQR] [160-190] vs 97.5 min; IQR [90-110] P < .001).The median pre- to postoperative differences in functional and visible penile lengths for group A were 1.5 cm; IQR [0-2] and 2.5 cm; IQR [1-3.5], respectively, while those in group B were both 0 cm; IQR [-1 to 0] P < .001). Group A patients reported higher scores in the International Index of Erectile Function satisfaction domains than the group B patients did (13; IQR [12-14] and 9; IQR [8-10] vs 11; IQR [9.5-12] and 8; IQR [6.5-8.5], respectively, P < .001). Moreover, the postoperative Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction score was higher in group A than that in group B (95.40; IQR [91-97.7] vs 85.20; IQR [72.7-91], respectively, P < .001). Common complications in group A were penile edema (77.4%), penile instability (9.7%) and glans numbness (9.7%).
The benefit in patient satisfaction following SLR and PL via ZP during PPI may outweigh the incremental increase in complications.
To our knowledge, this is the first prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SLR, PL, and ZP during PPI. However, because an optimal tool for assessing sexual satisfaction after PPI is lacking at this time, we alternatively adopted the most used assessment tools. Further, our data applies only to malleable penile prosthesis.
SLR and PL via ZP during PPI resulted in a substantial improvement of the patients\' sexual satisfaction without serious complications.

Extended reality-assisted urologic surgery (XRAS) is a novel technology that superimposes a computer-generated image on the physician\'s field to integrate common elements of the surgical process in more advanced detail. An extended reality (XR) interface is generated using optical head-mounted display (OHMD) devices.
To present the first case of HoloLens-assisted complex penile revision surgery.
We describe our pilot study of HoloLens-assisted penile revision surgery and present a thorough review of the literature regarding XRAS technology and innovative OHMD devices.
The ability of XRAS technology to superimpose a computer-generated image of the patient and integrate common elements of the surgical planning process with long-distance experts.
XRAS is a feasible technology for application in complex penile surgical planning processes.
XRAS and OHMD devices are novel technologies applicable to urological surgical training and planning.
Evidence suggests that the potential use of OHMD devices is safe and beneficial for surgeons. We intend to pioneer HoloLens technology in the surgical planning process of a malfunctioning penile implant due to herniation of the cylinder. This novel technology has not been used in prosthetic surgery, and current data about XRAS are limited.
OHMD devices are effective in the operative setting. Herein, we successfully demonstrated the integration of Microsoft HoloLens 2 into a penile surgical planning process for the first time. Further development and studies for this technology are necessary to better characterize the XRAS as a training and surgical planning tool.

With the infrapubic approach (IPA) for penile prosthesis implantation, lateral corporotomies carry the risk of injury to the laterally coursing dorsal nerves.
We sought to describe for the first time Shaeer\'s IPA, a modification of the IPA whereby malleable penile prosthesis cylinders are implanted through a single midline corporotomy in the bed of the deep dorsal vein, anatomically off the course of the dorsal nerves of the penis.
We compared semirigid penile prosthesis implantation via the single midline corporotomy IPA (IPA-S, n = 11) to the classic IPA with laterally placed dual corporotomies (IPA-D, n = 11) and to the penoscrotal approach (PSA; n = 13). Shaeer\'s IPA is performed through an infrapubic incision. A 3- to 5-cm length of the deep dorsal vein is stripped. A single 3- to 5-cm midline corporotomy is cut along the bed of the vein. Dilation, sizing, and implantation are performed through the single corporotomy on either side of the midline septum. Patients are discharged the same day and are allowed to bend the implant after 2 weeks and to commence intercourse after 3 weeks.
Operative time, postoperative satisfaction, International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5), and possible complications were recorded.
There were no statistically significant differences in age, postimplantation IIEF-5, or satisfaction between the 3 groups. Average operative time for the IPA-S group was 21.8% shorter than that for the IPA-D group, and 34.5% shorter than for the PSA group. Those differences were statistically significant. No complications were recorded in the IPA-S group. Infection occurred in 1 PSA case, and partial hypoesthesia in 1 IPA-D case.
The midline corporotomy confers an anatomical advantage that may help avoid nerve injury, thereby increasing the safety of the IPA.
The main limitation of this study is the limited sample number, considering that this is a pilot study.
The Shaeer\'s Midline-Corporotomy IPA is a minimally invasive technique for implantation of a semirigid penile prosthesis, with an anatomical advantage that may decrease the possibility of dorsal nerve injury.

The PICS technique (penile implant in combination with the sealing) was recently described as a valuable option to correct residual curvature during inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation in patients with complex Peyronie disease (PD).
To report the surgical and functional outcomes of the PICS technique in a multicentric series of patients.
A consecutive series of patients with complex PD who underwent PICS were recruited. Patients were from 2 European tertiary referral centers. Data regarding baseline characteristics and perioperative, postoperative, and functional outcomes were retrospectively evaluated.
Complete penile straightness, duration of operative time and hospital stay, as well as postoperative complications (including hematoma, IPP infection, and IPP mechanical failure) were recorded, whereas functional outcomes were evaluated through the administration of validated questionnaires at baseline and 12 months postoperatively: International Index of Erectile Function-5, Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP-2 and SEP-3), and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction.
Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 62 years (IQR, 57-70 years) were enrolled. Median preoperative curvature was 75° (IQR, 65°-77°). Median residual curvature after IPP implantation was 60° (IQR, 50°-70°). Overall, 31 patients (84%) achieved a totally straight penis. Only 6 patients (16%) experienced a residual penile curvature (<20° in all cases) after the procedure. No intraoperative complications were detected. Nine patients (24%) developed an early postoperative complication, 3 (8%) a transient fever, and 6 (16%) a genital hematoma. A single case of IPP acute infection requiring device explantation was recorded. The survey response rate was 100%. At the 12-month follow-up evaluation, the median IIEF-5 score was 23.5 (IQR, 22.2-25) with evident improvement vs the baseline value of 10 (IQR, 8-12). Accordingly, 92% of the patients responded positively to SEP-2 and SEP-3. For the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction, patients recorded a median postoperative value of 25 (IQR, 21-30) 1 year after PICS.
Complex PD is an end-stage disease featured by severe penile curvature, penile shortening, and erectile dysfunction: the gold standard approach is deemed to be penile prosthesis implantation, aiming to address penile curvature and erectile dysfunction, but in a limited percentage of cases, additional maneuvers are deemed necessary to manage residual penile curvature.
Our study has some limitations: the retrospective nature, relatively short follow-up, and limited number of patients.
The PICS technique may represent a reliable and effective treatment option to address significant residual curvature after IPP implantation.

Extended reality-assisted urologic surgery (XRAS) is a novel technology that superimposes a computer-generated image on the physician\'s field to integrate common elements of the surgical process in more advanced detail. An extended reality (XR) interface is generated using optical head-mounted display (OHMD) devices.
To present the first case of HoloLens-assisted complex penile revision surgery.
We describe our pilot study of HoloLens-assisted penile revision surgery and present a thorough review of the literature regarding XRAS technology and innovative OHMD devices.
The ability of XRAS technology to superimpose a computer-generated image of the patient and integrate common elements of the surgical planning process with long-distance experts.
XRAS is a feasible technology for application in complex penile surgical planning processes.
XRAS and OHMD devices are novel technologies applicable to urological surgical training and planning.
Evidence suggests that the potential use of OHMD devices is safe and beneficial for surgeons. We intend to pioneer HoloLens technology in the surgical planning process of a malfunctioning penile implant due to herniation of the cylinder. This novel technology has not been used in prosthetic surgery, and current data about XRAS are limited.
OHMD devices are effective in the operative setting. Herein, we successfully demonstrated the integration of Microsoft HoloLens 2 into a penile surgical planning process for the first time. Further development and studies for this technology are necessary to better characterize the XRAS as a training and surgical planning tool. Quesada-Olarte J, Carrion RE, Fernandez-Crespo R, et al. Extended Reality-Assisted Surgery as a Surgical Training Tool: Pilot Study Presenting First HoloLens-Assisted Complex Penile Revision Surgery. J Sex Med 2022;19:1580-1586.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) can lead to reduced sexual intimacy in men. The external penile prosthesis (EPP) is a device to help them participate in penetrative sex.
OBJECTIVE: We investigate factors that may affect the willingness of individuals with ED to try an EPP and explore how the EPP could be presented most effectively to such patients to enhance their willingness to try an EPP.
METHODS: Recruitment for this cross-sectional study occurred in-person and online. 147 participants (60.0 ± 14.3 years old; all experiencing self-reported ED) completed a survey containing both validated measures and questions specific to this study. The survey was open to English-speakers over the age of 18 who self-reported experiencing ED.
METHODS: The primary outcome was participants\' willingness to try an EPP based on their level of knowledge about using the EPP. Secondary outcomes included the influence of the sexual function, sexual distress, ED history, age, relationship duration, sexual flexibility on willingness to try an EPP. We also collected feedback from participants\' on how and where they would like to be introduced to the EPP option.
RESULTS: Most participants indicated a preference for being introduced to the EPP after trying some ED treatments (51.0%). Participants did not have strong preference regarding the setting where they were informed about the EPP. The majority however preferred having a sexual health therapist/counsellor (28.6%) or physician (25.9%) as the person introducing the EPP to them. Participants\' willingness to try the EPP increased with more information about the EPP presented to them (P < .001). Personalization of the EPP to match one\'s own penis was preferred by 38.7% of participants. Referring to this aid as an \'external penile prosthesis\' was significantly more preferred over alternative labels, such as a \"belted prosthetic phallus\" or \"strap-on dildo\" (Ps < .001 for both). Multiple regression analyses showed that only sexual script flexibility was associated with the initial willingness to try an EPP (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider presenting the EPP to men with ED, who desire maintaining penetrative sexual intercourse with their partners.
UNASSIGNED: This is the first study to explore factors influencing the willingness to try an EPP. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy of EPPs for maintaining sexual activity and satisfaction in the real-life setting.
CONCLUSIONS: This study informs clinicians about effective ways to introduce the EPP to patients with ED who wish to maintain insertive/receptive sex. Fu F, Duthie CJ, Wibowo E, et al. Openness to Using an External Penile Prosthesis for Maintaining Sexual Intimacy by Individuals with Erectile Dysfunction: A Cross-Sectional Study. Sex Med 2022;10:100559.

The utility of penile suspensory ligament release (SLR) in the setting of penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) has received limited attention in the literature.
To assess the efficacy and safety of penile SLR release, pubic lipectomy (PL), and the utility of penopubic Z-plasty (ZP) during malleable PPI in improving sexual satisfaction compared to that achieved with the conventional method.
Between August 2018 and April 2020, 61 patients with refractory erectile dysfunction were prospectively randomized into 2 groups; group A included 31 patients who underwent PPI with SLR and PL via ZP, and group B included 30 patients who underwent conventional PPI via a penoscrotal incision.
Penile length was assessed at 3 months, and sexual satisfaction was assessed up to 1 year after PPI using both validated and non-validated tools.
The median operative time was higher in group A than in group B (170 min; interquartile range [IQR] [160-190] vs 97.5 min; IQR [90-110] P < .001).The median pre- to postoperative differences in functional and visible penile lengths for group A were 1.5 cm; IQR [0-2] and 2.5 cm; IQR [1-3.5], respectively, while those in group B were both 0 cm; IQR [-1 to 0] P < .001). Group A patients reported higher scores in the International Index of Erectile Function satisfaction domains than the group B patients did (13; IQR [12-14] and 9; IQR [8-10] vs 11; IQR [9.5-12] and 8; IQR [6.5-8.5], respectively, P < .001). Moreover, the postoperative Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction score was higher in group A than that in group B (95.40; IQR [91-97.7] vs 85.20; IQR [72.7-91], respectively, P < .001). Common complications in group A were penile edema (77.4%), penile instability (9.7%) and glans numbness (9.7%).
The benefit in patient satisfaction following SLR and PL via ZP during PPI may outweigh the incremental increase in complications.
To our knowledge, this is the first prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SLR, PL, and ZP during PPI. However, because an optimal tool for assessing sexual satisfaction after PPI is lacking at this time, we alternatively adopted the most used assessment tools. Further, our data applies only to malleable penile prosthesis.
SLR and PL via ZP during PPI resulted in a substantial improvement of the patients\' sexual satisfaction without serious complications. Fotouh El Gharably MA, Ghoneima W, Lotfi MR, et al. The Efficacy of Suspensory Ligament Release and Pubic Lipectomy Via Penopubic Z Plasty During Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Improving Sexual Satisfaction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Sex Med 2022;19:852-863.