Patient outcome assessment

患者结局评估
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自从生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物的开发以来,青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)儿童的药物治疗得到了根本改善。然而,儿童遭受痛苦和焦虑,父母经常感到孤独和缺乏支持。一些父母报告说,他们的孩子被诊断时提供的信息可能很难吸收。因此,这项研究的目的是为最近诊断为JIA的儿童及其父母制定青少年关节炎支持计划(JASP-1).此外,目的是探讨患者和父母使用JASP-1的经历及其对患者身体健康的潜在影响。
    方法:JASP-1包括从诊断时间和提前一年开始的7次以患者和家庭为中心的临床就诊。数据是从参加JASP-1后儿童及其父母回答的研究特定问卷以及儿科风湿病登记簿中收集的。针对研究的问卷探讨了参与者在JIA第一年接受护理的经验。将干预(JASP-1)组的注册表和问卷数据与对照组进行比较。
    结果:分析表明,完成JASP-1的儿童和父母对他们在使用JIA的第一年所接受的护理比对照组更满意。结果还表明,完成JASP-1的儿童在12个月后被评估为整体健康状况更好,对照组的儿童(JASP-1=平均4.33,95%置信区间(CI)4.17-4.46),(对照=平均值3.68,95%CI3.29-4.06),(p=0.002)。此外,JASP-1组的儿童对日常生活的疾病影响较小(JASP-1=平均0.15,95%CI0.07-0.24)(对照=平均0.40,95%CI0.13-0.67),(p=0.017),活动关节少于对照组(JASP-1=平均0.62,95%CI0.35-1.58),(对照=平均0.87,95%CI0.18-1.56),(p=0.054)。
    结论:像JASP-1这样的支持计划可能是一种有效的方法,不仅可以在心理上支持新诊断为JIA的儿童及其父母,而且还可以增加儿童的整体身体健康并改善儿科风湿病的护理质量。
    背景:在ClinicalTrials.gov中回顾性注册,2月13日,ID为NCT06284616。
    BACKGROUND: Medical treatment for children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) has improved radically since the development of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. However, children suffer from pain and anxiety, and parents often experience loneliness and lack of support. Some parents reported that information provided at the time their child was diagnosed could be difficult to assimilate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a Juvenile Arthritis Support Program (JASP-1) for children recently diagnosed with JIA and their parents. Moreover, the aim was to explore patients´ and parents´ experiences with JASP-1 and its potential impact on patients´ physical health.
    METHODS: JASP-1 included seven patient- and family-centered clinical visit from time of diagnose and one year ahead. Data were collected from a study-specific questionnaire answered by children and their parents after participation in JASP-1 and from the pediatric rheumatology register. The study-specific questionnaire explored participants´ experience with the care they received during their first year with JIA. Registry and questionnaire data from the intervention (JASP-1) group was compared to a control group.
    RESULTS: The analysis revealed that children and parents who completed JASP-1 were more satisfied with the care they had received during their first year with JIA than the control group. The results also showed that children who completed JASP-1 were assessed as having better overall health after 12 months, than children in the control group (JASP-1 = mean 4.33, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 4.17 - 4.46), (Control = mean 3.68, 95% CI 3.29 - 4.06), (p = 0.002). Moreover, children in the JASP-1 group had less disease impact on daily life (JASP-1 = mean 0.15, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.24) (Control = mean 0.40, 95% CI 0.13 - 0.67), (p = 0.017) and less active joints than the control group (JASP-1 = mean 0.62, 95% CI 0.35 - 1.58), (Control = mean 0.87, 95% CI 0.18 - 1.56), (p = 0.054).
    CONCLUSIONS: A support program like JASP-1 could be an effective way of not only supporting children newly diagnosed with JIA and their parents psychologically but may also increase children\'s overall physical health and improve quality of care within pediatric rheumatology.
    BACKGROUND: Retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, the 13th of February with ID NCT06284616.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article

    估计有14-23%的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者会发生多次终生TBI。先前的TBI与中度至重度TBI(msTBI)患者的预后之间的关系尚未得到很好的描述。我们检查了之前的TBI,住院死亡率,在前瞻性美国msTBI队列中,以及受伤后12个月的结果。
    来自格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3-12的住院受试者的数据来自创伤性脑损伤转化研究和临床知识研究(招募期:2014-2019年)。使用俄亥俄州立大学TBI鉴定方法评估患有健忘症或意识改变的先前TBI。竞争风险回归调整年龄,性别,精神病史,颅脑损伤和颅外损伤严重程度检查了既往TBI和院内死亡率之间的关系,活着出院是竞争的风险。报告了调整后的HR(aHR(95%CI))。多变量逻辑回归评估了先前TBI之间的关联,死亡率,和不利的结果(格拉斯哥结果量表-扩展评分1-3(vs.4-8))在受伤后3、6和12个月。
    在405名急性msTBI受试者中,21.5%以前有TBI,与男性相关(87.4%vs.77.0%,p=0.037)和精神病史(34.5%vs.20.7%,p=0.010)。住院死亡率为10.1%(先前的TBI:17.2%,没有先前的TBI:8.2%,p=0.025)。竞争性风险回归表明,先前的TBI与住院死亡率的可能性相关(aHR=2.06(1.01-4.22)),但不能活着出院.既往TBI在3、6和12个月时与死亡率或不利结局无关。
    急性msTBI后,既往TBI病史与院内死亡率独立相关,但与伤后12个月内的死亡率或不良结局无关.这种选择性关联强调了在急性住院后早期收集标准化的TBI病史数据以告知风险分层的重要性。需要进行前瞻性验证研究。
    IV.
    NCT02119182。
    UNASSIGNED:
    UNASSIGNED: An estimated 14-23% of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) incur multiple lifetime TBIs. The relationship between prior TBI and outcomes in patients with moderate to severe TBI (msTBI) is not well delineated. We examined the associations between prior TBI, in-hospital mortality, and outcomes up to 12 months after injury in a prospective US msTBI cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from hospitalized subjects with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3-12 were extracted from the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study (enrollment period: 2014-2019). Prior TBI with amnesia or alteration of consciousness was assessed using the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method. Competing risk regressions adjusting for age, sex, psychiatric history, cranial injury and extracranial injury severity examined the associations between prior TBI and in-hospital mortality, with hospital discharged alive as the competing risk. Adjusted HRs (aHR (95% CI)) were reported. Multivariable logistic regressions assessed the associations between prior TBI, mortality, and unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score 1-3 (vs. 4-8)) at 3, 6, and 12 months after injury.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 405 acute msTBI subjects, 21.5% had prior TBI, which was associated with male sex (87.4% vs. 77.0%, p=0.037) and psychiatric history (34.5% vs. 20.7%, p=0.010). In-hospital mortality was 10.1% (prior TBI: 17.2%, no prior TBI: 8.2%, p=0.025). Competing risk regressions indicated that prior TBI was associated with likelihood of in-hospital mortality (aHR=2.06 (1.01-4.22)), but not with hospital discharged alive. Prior TBI was not associated with mortality or unfavorable outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months.
    UNASSIGNED: After acute msTBI, prior TBI history is independently associated with in-hospital mortality but not with mortality or unfavorable outcomes within 12 months after injury. This selective association underscores the importance of collecting standardized prior TBI history data early after acute hospitalization to inform risk stratification. Prospective validation studies are needed.
    UNASSIGNED: IV.
    UNASSIGNED: NCT02119182.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于以人为中心的结果测量(PCOM)的质量改善(QI)计划在促进最佳姑息治疗方面发挥着重要作用。然而,PCOM的常规使用缓慢且难以实现,包括在QI计划中。
    目的:本研究旨在确定支持将PCOM作为医院姑息治疗常规实践的实施策略,以及实施理论,指导这些实施策略设计的模型和框架(TMF)。
    方法:根据JoannaBriggsInstitute(JBI)范围审查框架进行了范围审查。四个数据库(Medline,CINAHL,对Scopus和PubMed)进行了系统搜索,以查找1990年1月1日至2024年3月8日之间发表的文献。
    结果:115个独特的实施策略,从11项纳入的研究中确定,被映射到73项实施变更的专家建议(ERIC)离散实施策略上,涵盖52%的ERIC战略。最常用的类别是培训和教育利益相关者,并支持临床医生,然后发展利益相关者的相互关系,并使用评估和迭代策略。出现了三个关键主题:做什么;如何做;以及与谁一起做。在本次审查中,只有四项研究采用了TMF来指导实施策略的设计。
    结论:为了促进基于PCOM的QI计划的实施,应通过使用严格的TMF,根据已识别/潜在的障碍和促进因素制定策略。必须透明和一致地报告实施战略的组成部分,以便在未来的研究和实践中进行复制和衡量。
    此范围审查在其设计或执行中不直接涉及患者或公众。然而,这是一项实施研究的一部分,旨在将姑息治疗结果合作(PCOC)模式纳入中国一家癌症医院的常规临床实践.在正式实施之前,该医院的姑息治疗专业人员强调,需要对现有证据进行全面分析,以支持在其特定临床环境中有效采用PCOC模型。
    BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) programs based on person-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) play an important role in promoting optimal palliative care. However, routine use of PCOMs has been slow and difficult to implement, including within QI programs.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify implementation strategies that support the implementation of PCOMs as routine practice in hospital-based palliative care, as well as the implementation theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) guiding the design of these implementation strategies.
    METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review framework. Four databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus and PubMed) were systematically searched for literature published between 1 January 1990 and 8 March 2024.
    RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen unique implementation strategies, identified from 11 included studies, were mapped onto the 73 Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) discrete implementation strategies, covering 52% of the ERIC strategies. The most commonly used categories were train and educate stakeholders, and support clinicians, followed by develop stakeholder interrelationships and use evaluation and iterative strategies. Three key themes emerged: what to do; how to do it; and who to do it with. Only four studies employed TMFs to guide the design of the implementation strategies in this review.
    CONCLUSIONS: To promote the implementation of PCOM-based QI programs, strategies should be developed based on identified/potential barriers and facilitators by using rigorous TMFs. The components of the implementation strategies must be reported transparently and consistently to enable replication and measurement in future research and practice.
    UNASSIGNED: This scoping review does not directly involve patients or the general public in its design or execution. However, it is part of an implementation study aimed at integrating the Palliative Care Outcome Collaboration (PCOC) model into routine clinical practice at a cancer hospital in China. Before the formal implementation, palliative care professionals from this hospital highlighted the need for a comprehensive analysis of existing evidence to support the effective adoption of the PCOC model in their specific clinical setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)是腹腔镜胆囊切除术后常见的痛苦症状。我们报告费率,以及与术后恶心呕吐相关的因素,预防性止吐处方的模式,以及在JigmeDorjiWangchuck(JDW)国家转诊医院接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中使用的麻醉技术,不丹.
    方法:在JDW国家转诊医院进行了一项横断面研究,2018年1月至12月。全麻下行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者全部纳入研究。人口统计学变量,术前用药,诱导剂,肌肉松弛剂,用于维持的吸入剂,阿片类和辅助镇痛药,使用的逆转剂,并记录24h内PONV的发生情况。使用SPSS(版本23)分析数据。连续变量使用t检验或曼-惠特尼检验进行比较,分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。采用二元Logistic回归分析确定术后恶心呕吐的相关因素。
    结果:190例患者在全身麻醉下接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术。腹腔镜胆囊切除术后PONV的发生率为31.1%(59/190)。超过一半(53.7%,102/190)的研究人群年龄在21-40岁之间,超过80%(157/190)是女性,2/3为超重和肥胖。最常用的术前用药是雷尼替丁(39%,34/87)和甲氧氯普胺(31%,27/87)。超过一半(57.4%,109/190)的患者在诱导前接受了吗啡作为阿片类镇痛药。硫喷酮钠是一种常用的诱导剂(65.8%,125/190)。琥珀酰胆碱和阿曲库铵是最优选的肌肉松弛剂。异氟醚和空气是维持麻醉最常用的吸入麻醉剂。昂丹司琼是术中最优选的止吐药。既往晕动病史(OR5.8,95CI2.9-11.2,p<0.001),使用硫喷妥钠(OR4.1,95CI1.9-9.1,p<0.001)是PONV的独立危险因素。止吐药的使用(OR0.1,95CI0.0-0.4,p=0.002),异丙酚(OR0.2,95CI0.1-0.5,p<0.001),辅助镇痛对乙酰氨基酚(OR0.4,95CI0.2-0.8,p=0.026),静脉输液充分水化(OR0.9,95CI0.9-1.0,p=0.042)是PONV的预防因素。
    结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术后PONV的发生率较高。晕动史和使用硫喷妥钠诱导是PONV的独立危险因素。在预防PONV方面,多模式预防性止吐药的使用是稳健的,优于单一疗法。这一发现再次强调了风险分层和适当使用止吐剂和麻醉剂以预防PONV的必要性。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common distressing symptoms experienced after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We report the rate, and the factors associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting, the patterns of prophylactic antiemetic prescription, and the anesthetic techniques used among patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Jigme Dorji Wangchuck (JDW) National Referral Hospital, Bhutan.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the JDW National Referral Hospital, from January to December 2018. All the patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were included in the study. The demographic variables, premedication, induction agents, muscle relaxants, inhalational agents for maintenance, opioid and adjuvant analgesics, the reversal agents used, and the occurrence of PONV within 24 h were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 23). Continuous variables were compared using a t-test or Mann-Whitney test, categorical variables were tested using chi-square or Fisher\'s exact tests. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting.
    RESULTS: 190 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. The rate of PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 31.1% (59/190). Over half (53.7%, 102/190) of the study population were within 21-40 years of age, over 80% (157/190) were female, and 2/3rd were overweight and obese. The most frequently used premedication was ranitidine (39%, 34/87) and metoclopramide (31%, 27/87). More than half (57.4%, 109/190) of the patients received morphine as an opioid analgesic before induction. Sodium thiopentone was a commonly used induction agent (65.8%, 125/190). Succinylcholine and atracurium were mostly preferred muscle relaxants. Isoflurane and air were the most used inhalational anesthetic agents for the maintenance of anesthesia. Ondansetron was the most preferred anti-emetics during the intraoperative period. Previous history of motion sickness (OR 5.8, 95%CI 2.9-11.2, p < 0.001), and use of sodium thiopental (OR 4.1, 95%CI 1.9-9.1, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for PONV. The use of antiemetics (OR 0.1, 95%CI 0.0-0.4, p = 0.002), propofol (OR 0.2, 95%CI 0.1-0.5, p < 0.001), adjuvant analgesic paracetamol (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.2-0.8, p = 0.026), and adequate hydration with IV fluids (OR 0.9, 95%CI 0.9-1.0, p = 0.042) were preventive factors for PONV.
    CONCLUSIONS: The rate of PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was high. History of motion sickness and use of sodium thiopental for induction were independent risk factors of PONV. The use of multimodal prophylactic antiemetics was robust and superior to monotherapy in preventing PONV. This finding re-emphasizes the need for risk stratification and appropriate use of antiemetics and anesthetic agents to prevent PONV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这更正了文章DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1340385。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1340385.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述所做的改编,并检查评估者之间的可靠性和管理远程健康版本的多发性硬化功能复合材料(tele-MSFC)的可行性。
    多发性硬化功能复合材料(MSFC)是一种常用的,亲自临床结果评估。它由定时25英尺步行测试(T25FWT)组成,九孔钉试验(NHPT),和起搏听觉系列附加测试(PASAT)。作为大型临床试验的一部分,MSFC适用于视频会议管理。其中一项适应措施包括为没有足够空间容纳T25FWT的参与者进行定时12.5英尺步行测试(T12.5FWT)。参与者,考官,评估者在线完成了有关他们对tele-MSFC的满意度和经验的调查。
    参与者在家中使用笔记本电脑或智能手机进行tele-MSFC,而审查员则在远程位置对tele-MSFC进行实时评分。
    有轻度至中度多发性硬化症(MS)症状的社区居住成年人(n=61)。
    不适用。
    Tele-MSFC。
    类内部相关系数(ICC)评估了审查员和2个独立评估员之间的评估员之间的可靠性,后者后来对tele-MSFC的记录进行了评分。所有测试的中间可靠性都很好(ICC>0.90),包括T12.5FWT。参与者对tele-MSFC非常满意。然而,挑战包括为T25FWT提供足够的空间,技术难题,以及在测试过程中要求护理人员在场的中度损伤患者的安全和隐私考虑。
    tele-MSFC对于具有轻度至中度MS症状的社区居住成年人的适应性管理是可靠且可行的。需要进一步验证T12.5FWT。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe the adaptations made and to examine interrater reliability and feasibility of administering a telehealth version of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (tele-MSFC).
    UNASSIGNED: The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is a commonly used, in-person clinical outcome assessment. It is composed of the timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25FWT), Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). The MSFC was adapted for videoconference administration as part of a larger clinical trial. One of the adaptations included administering a timed 12.5-Foot Walk Test (T12.5FWT) for participants who did not have adequate space in their homes for the T25FWT. Participants, examiners, and raters completed surveys online about their satisfaction and experience with tele-MSFC.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants underwent the tele-MSFC in their homes using a laptop or smartphone while examiners scored the tele-MSFC in real-time at a remote location.
    UNASSIGNED: Community-dwelling adults (n=61) with mild-to-moderate multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: Not applicable.
    UNASSIGNED: Tele-MSFC.
    UNASSIGNED: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed interrater reliability between the examiner and 2 independent raters who later scored a recording of the tele-MSFC. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC>0.90) for all tests, including the T12.5FWT. Participants were highly satisfied with tele-MSFC. However, challenges included adequate space for T25FWT, technical difficulties, and safety and privacy considerations of individuals with moderate impairments who were requested to have their caregivers present during testing.
    UNASSIGNED: The tele-MSFC is reliable and feasible to administer with adaptations for community-dwelling adults with mild to moderate MS symptoms. Further validation of T12.5FWT is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)作为难治性COVID-19相关ARDS(C-ARDS)的抢救治疗的有效性仍存在争议。我们描述了在我们的ECMO中心接受VV-ECMO治疗的C-ARDS患者队列,重点关注可能影响院内死亡率的因素,并描述肺力学的时间过程以评估预后。方法:我们在都灵大学医院的重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,意大利,2020年3月至2021年12月。ECMO的适应症和管理遵循体外生命支持组织(ELSO)指南。结果:60天住院死亡率特别高(85.4%)。非幸存者患者在ECMO之前接受无创通气支持和类固醇治疗的频率更高(95.1%vs.57.1%,p=0.018和73.2%vs.28.6%,p=0.033,分别),而高血压是与住院死亡率独立相关的唯一ECMO前因素(HR:2.06,95CI:1.06~4.00).在ECMO期间记录了较高的出血率(85.4%)和超感染率(91.7%),可能影响ECMO的总长度(18天,IQR:10-24)和住院时间(32天,IQR:24-47)。非幸存者的静态肺顺应性较低(p=0.031),并且随着时间的推移而有所不同(p=0.049),与非幸存者的初始值相比,下降了48%。结论:我们的数据表明,在ECMO的通用合格标准中考虑NIS和ECMO期间肺顺应性的变化作为预后指标的重要性。
    Background: The efficacy of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) as rescue therapy for refractory COVID-19-related ARDS (C-ARDS) is still debated. We describe the cohort of C-ARDS patients treated with VV-ECMO at our ECMO center, focusing on factors that may affect in-hospital mortality and describing the time course of lung mechanics to assess prognosis. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study in the intensive care unit at the \"Città della Salute e della Scienza\" University Hospital in Turin, Italy, between March 2020 and December 2021. Indications and management of ECMO followed the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) guidelines. Results: The 60-day in-hospital mortality was particularly high (85.4%). Non-survivor patients were more frequently treated with non-invasive ventilatory support and steroids before ECMO (95.1% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.018 and 73.2% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.033, respectively), while hypertension was the only pre-ECMO factor independently associated with in-hospital mortality (HR: 2.06, 95%CI: 1.06-4.00). High rates of bleeding (85.4%) and superinfections (91.7%) were recorded during ECMO, likely affecting the overall length of ECMO (18 days, IQR: 10-24) and the hospital stay (32 days, IQR: 24-47). Static lung compliance was lower in non-survivors (p = 0.031) and differed over time (p = 0.049), decreasing by 48% compared to initial values in non-survivors. Conclusions: Our data suggest the importance of considering NIS among the common ECMO eligibility criteria and changes in lung compliance during ECMO as a prognostic marker.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估改良的保留肌肉后入路的效果;SPEIRE(保存梨状肌和内内肌,修复Externus),与标准外侧入路相比,半髋关节置换术治疗移位的囊内骨折对术后活动度和功能的影响。
    务实,优越性,多中心,平行组,随机对照试验(内部试点)。参与者,病房工作人员,进行术后评估的研究人员对分配不知情.CTU使用计算机生成的列表集中分配治疗。
    英格兰西南部的六家医院,招聘2019年11月25日-2022年4月25日。
    244名需要髋关节置换术的成年人(≥60岁)(每种入路分配122名)。分配给SPAIRE和横向的90名和85名参与者,分别,在预设的数据收集窗口内有主要结局数据.
    使用SPAIRE或标准外侧入路进行手术。术后3天和120天随访。
    牛津髋关节评分(OHS),通过电话在120天。次要结果:功能和流动性(3天),疼痛(3天,120天),排放目的地,住院时间,并发症和死亡率(120天内),生活质量和居住地(120天)。
    参与者的平均年龄为84.6岁(SD7.2);168名(69%)为女性。主要结果:120天时OHS差异的证据很少;调整后的平均差异(SPAIRE-侧向)-1.23(95%CI-3.96至1.49,p=0.37)。次要结果:在SPAIRE组3天时,参与者报告的疼痛程度较低;其余结果在两组之间没有差异。
    参与者\'的流动性和功能在短期(3天)和长期(120天)方面相似,无论是接收SPAIRE还是横向进近。在住院时间方面,这两种方法都不能比另一种方法受益。返回骨折前住所,在120天内存活,或120天的生活质量。接受SPAIRE方法的参与者在术后早期可能会经历较少的疼痛。在120天内,将髋关节置换术中的后入路修改为SPAIRE入路可使患者的预后与外侧入路相同。
    NCT04095611。
    UNASSIGNED: Assess the effect of a modified muscle sparing posterior approach; SPAIRE (Save Piriformis and Internus, Repairing Externus), in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures on postoperative mobility and function compared with a standard lateral approach.
    UNASSIGNED: Pragmatic, superiority, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (with internal pilot). Participants, ward staff, and research staff conducting postoperative assessments were blinded to allocation. A CTU allocated treatments centrally using computer-generated lists.
    UNASSIGNED: Six hospitals in Southwest England, recruiting November 25, 2019-April 25, 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: 244 adults (≥60 years) requiring hip hemiarthroplasty (122 allocated to each approach). 90 and 85 participants allocated to SPAIRE and lateral, respectively, had primary outcome data within the prespecified data collection window.
    UNASSIGNED: Surgery using SPAIRE or standard lateral approach. Follow-up 3 days and 120 days postoperation.
    UNASSIGNED: Oxford Hip Score (OHS), via telephone at 120 days. Secondary outcomes: function and mobility (3 days), pain (3 days, 120 days), discharge destination, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality (within 120 days), quality of life and place of residence (120 days).
    UNASSIGNED: Participants\' mean age was 84.6 years (SD 7.2); 168 (69%) were women. Primary outcome: little evidence of a difference in OHS at 120 days; adjusted mean difference (SPAIRE-lateral) -1.23 (95% CI -3.96 to 1.49, p=0.37). Secondary outcomes: indication of lower participant-reported pain at 3 days in SPAIRE arm; no differences between arms for remaining outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants\' mobility and function are similar in the short term (3 days) and longer term (120 days), whether receiving the SPAIRE or lateral approach. Neither approach confers benefit over the other in terms of length of hospital stay, return to prefracture residence, survival within 120 days, or quality of life at 120 days. Participants receiving SPAIRE approach may experience less pain in the early postoperative period. Modifying the posterior approach in hip hemiarthroplasty to the SPAIRE approach gives equivalent patient outcomes to the lateral approach within 120 days.
    UNASSIGNED: NCT04095611.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人口老龄化是医疗保健系统的挑战,必须确定满足其需求的策略。实践以患者为中心的护理已被证明对该患者群体有益。以患者为中心的护理的效果称为以患者为中心的结果,可以使用结果测量来评估。
    目的:主要目的是回顾和绘制与老年人以患者为中心的结果和以患者为中心的结果测量相关的现有知识,以及确定关键概念和知识差距。研究问题是:如何衡量老年人以患者为中心的结果,哪些以患者为中心的结果对老年人最重要?
    方法:范围综述。
    方法:搜索电子数据库中的相关出版物,2000年至2021年的灰色文献数据库和网站。两名审稿人独立筛选标题和摘要,接下来是全文回顾和使用数据提取框架提取数据。
    结果:纳入了18项研究,其中6名患者和/或专家参与了确定结果的过程。对老年人来说最重要的结果被解释为:获得护理和体验,自治和控制,认知,日常生活,情绪健康,falls,一般健康,药物,总生存率,疼痛,参与决策,物理功能,身体健康,死亡的地方,社会角色功能,症状负担,和在医院度过的时间。最常提及/使用的结果测量工具是成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT),EQ-5D,步态速度,Katz-ADL指数,患者健康问卷(PHQ9),SF/RAND-36和4项筛选Zarit负担访谈。
    结论:很少有研究调查老年人对他们最重要的事情的看法,这形成了该领域的知识鸿沟。未来的研究应该集中在为老年人提供他们认为对他们最重要的声音。
    BACKGROUND: The aging population is a challenge for the healthcare system that must identify strategies that meet their needs. Practicing patient-centered care has been shown beneficial for this patient-group. The effect of patient-centered care is called patient-centered outcomes and can be appraised using outcomes measurements.
    OBJECTIVE: The main aim was to review and map existing knowledge related to patient-centered outcomes and patient-centered outcomes measurements for older people, as well as identify key-concepts and knowledge-gaps. The research questions were: How can patient-centered outcomes for older people be measured, and which patient-centered outcomes matters the most for the older people?
    METHODS: Scoping review.
    METHODS: Search for relevant publications in electronical databases, grey literature databases and websites from year 2000 to 2021. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, followed by full text review and extraction of data using a data extraction framework.
    RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included, of which six with involvement of patients and/or experts in the process on determine the outcomes. Outcomes that matter the most to older people was interpreted as: access to- and experience of care, autonomy and control, cognition, daily living, emotional health, falls, general health, medications, overall survival, pain, participation in decision making, physical function, physical health, place of death, social role function, symptom burden, and time spent in hospital. The most frequently mentioned/used outcomes measurements tools were the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT), EQ-5D, Gait Speed, Katz- ADL index, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), SF/RAND-36 and 4-Item Screening Zarit Burden Interview.
    CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have investigated the older people\'s opinion of what matters the most to them, which forms a knowledge-gap in the field. Future research should focus on providing older people a stronger voice in what they think matters the most to them.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有一系列策略可以改善老年人的预后,特别是在急性护理(AC)发作期间和之后的日常生活基本活动方面。本文概述了以结果为导向的质量指标(QIs)与常见的老年综合征有关的原始发展以及对急性普通内科病房住院的虚弱老人的护理功能。
    方法:设计QI是使用文献证据开发的,专家意见,实地研究数据和正式的投票过程。对文献进行系统的文献回顾,确定了现有的QIs(没有结果QIs)和改善AC老年人预后的干预措施的证据。两个专家小组在审议证据后制定了初步指标。在分析了现场测试的数据(指标患病率,跨站点的可变性),小组会议在正式投票过程之前完善了合格中介机构。
    方法:收集了9个澳大利亚普通医疗病房的数据。
    方法:70岁及以上患者,在入住AC病房后24小时内同意。
    方法:在入院和出院时进行RAI急性护理-老年综合评估(interRAIAC-CGA);在医院进行每日风险评估;28天电话随访和图表审核。
    结果:建立了十个结局QIs,重点关注常见的老年综合征和功能,以护理在急性普通内科病房住院的虚弱老人。
    结论:得出了10个结果QIs。这些QIs可用于确定特定行动将导致改善医院老年人护理质量的领域。
    BACKGROUND: A range of strategies are available that can improve the outcomes of older persons particularly in relation to basic activities of daily living during and after an acute care (AC) episode. This paper outlines the original development of outcome-oriented quality indicators (QIs) in relation to common geriatric syndromes and function for the care of the frail aged hospitalized in acute general medical wards.
    METHODS: Design QIs were developed using evidence from literature, expert opinion, field study data and a formal voting process. A systematic literature review of literature identified existing QIs (there were no outcome QIs) and evidence of interventions that improve older persons\' outcomes in AC. Preliminary indicators were developed by two expert panels following consideration of the evidence. After analysis of the data from field testing (indicator prevalence, variability across sites), panel meetings refined the QIs prior to a formal voting process.
    METHODS: Data was collected in nine Australian general medical wards.
    METHODS: Patients aged 70 years and over, consented within 24 h of admission to the AC ward.
    METHODS: The interRAI Acute Care - Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (interRAI AC-CGA) was administered at admission and discharge; a daily risk assessment in hospital; 28-day phone follow-up and chart audit.
    RESULTS: Ten outcome QIs were established which focused on common geriatric syndromes and function for the care of the frail aged hospitalized in acute general medical wards.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ten outcome QIs were developed. These QIs can be used to identify areas where specific action will lead to improvements in the quality of care delivered to older persons in hospital.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号