Intervertebral Disc Displacement

椎间盘移位
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是从生物力学的角度探讨前路经皮经皮内窥镜颈椎间盘切除术(ATc-PECD)对颈椎的长期影响。
    方法:使用有限元方法建立了正常颈椎C2-T1的三维模型。随后,在正常模型的基础上构建椎间盘退变模型和手术退变模型。相同的加载条件用于模拟屈曲,扩展,颈椎的侧向弯曲和轴向旋转。我们计算了颈椎活动范围(ROM),椎间盘内压,不同运动下的椎体内压,观察颈椎术后生物力学的变化。同时,我们结合了ATc-PECD的长期随访结果,并使用成像方法测量椎骨和椎间盘的高度以及颈椎的活动度,使用日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估疼痛缓解和神经功能恢复.
    结果:长期随访结果显示,术前JOA评分,颈部VAS评分,手VAS评分,IDH,VBH,患者的ROM分别为9.49±2.16、6.34±1.68、5.14±1.48、5.95±0.22mm,15.41±1.68mm,和52.46±9.36°。变化为15.71±1.13(P<0.05),1.02±0.82(P<0.05),0.77±0.76(P<0.05),4.73±0.26mm(P<0.05),13.67±1.48mm(P<0.05),59.26±6.72°(P<0.05),分别,术后6年。有限元分析表明,建立颈椎病模型后,屈曲的整体运动范围,扩展,横向弯曲,旋转减少了3.298°,0.753°,3.852°,和1.131°。相反,建立骨隧道模型后,这些动作的运动范围增加了0.843°,0.65°,0.278°,和0.488°,与随访结果一致。此外,节段运动变化的分析表明,颈椎活动度的增加主要是由手术模型节段造成的。此外,有限元模型表明,骨隧道可能导致椎体和椎间盘内的应力增加手术段。
    结论:长期随访研究表明ATc-PECD具有良好的临床疗效,ATc-PECD可作为CDH治疗的补充方法。FEM表明,ATc-PECD可导致手术节段椎体和椎间盘内应力增加,与ATc-PECD术后颈椎退变直接相关。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term consequences on the cervical spine after Anterior transcorporeal percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy (ATc-PECD) from the biomechanical standpoint.
    METHODS: A three-dimensional model of the normal cervical spine C2-T1 was established using finite element method. Subsequently, a disc degeneration model and degeneration with surgery model were constructed on the basis of the normal model. The same loading conditions were applied to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation of the cervical spine. We calculated the cervical range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, and intravertebral body pressure under different motions for observing changes in cervical spine biomechanics after surgery. At the same time, we combined the results of a long-term follow-up of the ATc-PECD, and used imaging methods to measure vertebral and disc height and cervical mobility, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used to assess pain relief and neurological functional recovery.
    RESULTS: The long-term follow-up results revealed that preoperative JOA score, neck VAS score, hand VAS score, IDH, VBH, and ROM for patients were 9.49 ± 2.16, 6.34 ± 1.68, 5.14 ± 1.48, 5.95 ± 0.22 mm, 15.41 ± 1.68 mm, and 52.46 ± 9.36° respectively. It changed to 15.71 ± 1.13 (P < 0.05), 1.02 ± 0.82 (P < 0.05), 0.77 ± 0.76 (P < 0.05), 4.73 ± 0.26 mm (P < 0.05), 13.67 ± 1.48 mm (P < 0.05), and 59.26 ± 6.72° (P < 0.05), respectively, at 6 years postoperatively. Finite element analysis showed that after establishing the cervical spondylosis model, the overall motion range for flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation decreased by 3.298°, 0.753°, 3.852°, and 1.131° respectively. Conversely, after establishing the bone tunnel model, the motion range for these actions increased by 0.843°, 0.65°, 0.278°, and 0.488° respectively, consistent with the follow-up results. Moreover, analysis of segmental motion changes revealed that the increased cervical spine mobility was primarily contributed by the surgical model segments. Additionally, the finite element model demonstrated that bone tunneling could lead to increased stress within the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs of the surgical segments.
    CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up studies have shown that ATc-PECD has good clinical efficacy and that ATc-PECD can be used as a complementary method for CDH treatment. The FEM demonstrated that ATc-PECD can lead to increased internal stresses in the vertebral body and intervertebral discs of the operated segments, which is directly related to cervical spine degeneration after ATc-PECD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Modic变化(MC)被确定为下腰痛的独立危险因素。不同亚型的MC对术后疼痛缓解的影响不同。然而,对于具有不同MC亚型的患者术后MC分数的转变,缺乏共识。
    这项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析搜索了PubMed中的英语文章,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,和Embase数据库,直到2024年1月。研究的重点是椎间盘切除术后在各种微裂纹亚型之间过渡的患者。主要结果指标是术后不同微裂纹分数之间的转换。
    分析了8项689名参与者的研究。总的来说,有中等至高质量的证据表明不同MC亚型的MC转换发生率存在差异.MC转换的总发生率为27.7%,比率为37.0%,20.5%,MC0、MC1和MC2亚型为19.1%,分别。因此,术后MC型转变,特别是从术前MC0到MC1(17.7%)或MC2(13.1%),更常见,以MC1变换为主。术前合并症MC1型(19.0%)的患者比MC2型(12.4%)的患者术后转变更多。
    这项研究强调了分析腰椎间盘突出症患者椎间盘切除术后MC的重要性,显示腰椎椎间盘切除术后MC的发病率较高,特别是从术前缺乏MC到MC1或MC2。术前MC0型比MC1或MC2型组合更容易发生术后MC转化。这些发现对于提高手术效果和术后护理至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Modic changes (MCs) are identified as an independent risk factor for low back pain. Different subtypes of MCs vary in their impact on postoperative pain relief. However, consensus on the transformation of postoperative MC fractions in patients with distinct MC subtypes is lacking.
    UNASSIGNED: This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis searched English-language articles in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases until January 2024. Studies included focused on patients transitioning between various microcrack subtypes post-discectomy. The primary outcome measure was the transformation between different postoperative microcrack fractions.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight studies with 689 participants were analyzed. Overall, there is moderate to high-quality evidence indicating differences in the incidence of MC conversion across MC subtypes. The overall incidence of MC conversion was 27.7%, with rates of 37.0%, 20.5%, and 19.1% for MC0, MC1, and MC2 subtypes, respectively. Thus, postoperative MC type transformation, particularly from preoperative MC0 to MC1 (17.7%) or MC2 (13.1%), was more common, with MC1 transformation being predominant. Patients with preoperative comorbid MC1 types (19.0%) exhibited more postoperative transitions than those with MC2 types (12.4%).
    UNASSIGNED: This study underscores the significance of analyzing post-discectomy MCs in patients with lumbar disc herniation, revealing a higher incidence of MCs post-lumbar discectomy, particularly from preoperative absence of MC to MC1 or MC2. Preoperative MC0 types were more likely to undergo postoperative MC transformation than combined MC1 or MC2 types. These findings are crucial for enhancing surgical outcomes and postoperative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经皮腰椎髓核成形术(PLN)和椎间盘内电热疗法(IDET)是治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛(D-LBP)的有效方法。我们评估了PLN和IDET的有效性以及与椎间盘内手术相关的阳性预测因素。我们回顾了205例接受IDET或PLN治疗的D-LBP患者的病历,然后进行了积极的激发性椎间盘造影。成功的结果被定义为在6个月随访时,在数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分上疼痛缓解≥50%。使用多变量分析研究了椎间盘内手术的结果与临床变量之间的关系。在142例患者中(89例PLN和53例IDET),86(60.5%)经历了成功的结果,PLN(n=61,68.5%)比IDET(n=25,47.2%;P=.010)更大。激发椎间盘造影的高级别改良达拉斯椎间盘量表和L3/L4脊柱水平的手术是成功结局的独立阳性预测因素(分别为P=.023和.010)。并存的精神疾病,比如抑郁和焦虑,是成功治疗的阴性预测因子(P=0.007)。在6个月的随访期间,未报告与椎间盘内手术相关的严重并发症。PLN和IDET可能对治疗内部椎间盘破裂(IDD)引起的下腰痛(LBP)有效。高级改良达拉斯迪斯科格拉姆,L3/4脊髓水平的手术,并且没有神经精神疾病可能是椎间盘内手术成功结局的积极因素。
    Percutaneous lumbar nucleoplasty (PLN) and intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) are effective treatment options for discogenic low back pain (D-LBP). We evaluated the effectiveness of PLN and IDET and the positive predictive factors associated with intradiscal procedures. We reviewed the medical records of 205 patients who underwent IDET or PLN in patients with D-LBP followed by positive provocation discography. A successful outcome was defined as ≥ 50% pain relief on the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at the 6-month follow-up visit. The relationship between the outcome of the intradiscal procedure and clinical variables was investigated using multivariate analyses. Of the 142 patients (89 with PLN and 53 with IDET), 86 (60.5%) experienced a successful outcome, which was more substantial in PLN (n = 61, 68.5%) than in IDET (n = 25, 47.2%; P = .010). The high-grade Modified Dallas Discogram Scale in provocation discography and a procedure at the L3/L4 spinal level were independent positive predictors of successful outcomes (P = .023 and .010, respectively). Coexisting psychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety, were negative predictors of successful treatment (P = .007). No serious complications related to the intradiscal procedures were reported during the 6-month follow-up period. PLN and IDET might be effective for managing low back pain (LBP) from internal disc disruption (IDD). The high-grade Modified Dallas Discogram, a procedure at the L3/4 spinal level, and the absence of neuropsychiatric disorders could be positive factors for the successful outcome of the intradiscal procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这次回顾,横截面,和描述性研究旨在分析腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)和/或腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者使用韩国传统医学服务的趋势。在这项研究中,根据健康保险审查和评估服务(HIRA)提供的全国患者样本数据,调查了韩国医药服务利用的趋势,包括以下信息:患者的人口统计学特征,总支出,每个类别的索赔声明数量,每个类别的医疗支出,以及访问韩国传统医疗机构的路线。研究人群包括从2010年1月至2019年12月至少一次访问韩国医疗机构的患者,以LSS和LDH为主要诊断。使用韩国传统医学服务进行治疗的LDH患者增加了约1.36倍。45岁以下的LDH和LSS患者更可能是男性,但是在45岁以上的人群中,女性所占的比例更高。总的来说,女性在这两种疾病中的比例略高于她们的同龄人。从索赔数据中提取的治疗细节,两种疾病的针灸治疗比例最高。此外,50.7%到韩国医疗机构治疗这两种疾病的患者也访问了常规的西医机构。这些病人,他们在一家韩国医疗机构被诊断出患有这种疾病,参观了传统机构,然后返回;传统机构主要用于检查(40.5%)。在LDH和/或LSS患者中证实了对韩国传统医学服务的利用增加;特别是,在LSS患者中观察到急剧增加.这项研究的结果将作为临床医生的基础研究数据,研究人员,和政策制定者。
    This retrospective, cross-sectional, and descriptive study aimed to analyze the trend of utilizing traditional Korean medicine services in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and/or lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In this study, based on the national patient sample data provided by Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), the trend of Korean medicine service utilization was investigated, including the following information: demographic characteristics of the patients, the total expenditure, number of claim statements per category, medical care expenditure per category, and routes of visiting traditional Korean medicine institutions. The study population comprised patients who visited Korean medicine institutions at least once from January 2010 to December 2019, with LSS and LDH as the primary diagnosis. LDH patients who used traditional Korean medicine services for treatment increased by about 1.36 times. LDH and LSS patients under 45 years of age were more likely to be males, but women accounted for a higher percentage among those over 45 years of age. Overall, women accounted for a slightly higher percentage than their counterparts for both diseases. From details of treatments received that were extracted from the claims data, acupuncture treatment accounted for the highest percentage for both disorders. Moreover, 50.7% of the patients who visited Korean medicine institutions to treat the two diseases also visited conventional Western medicine institutions. These patients, who were diagnosed with their condition at a Korean medicine institution, visited a conventional institution and then returned; the conventional institutions were primarily used for examination (40.5%). Increased utilization of traditional Korean medicine services was confirmed among patients with LDH and/or LSS; in particular, a sharp increase was noted among patients with LSS. The results of this study will be useful as basic research data for clinicians, researchers, and policy makers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈椎病(CS),包括脊髓病和神经根病,是最常见的退行性颈椎疾病。本研究旨在评估与常规颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)相比,单侧双门静脉内窥镜(UBE)治疗单侧颈神经根病或单侧颈椎间盘突出症引起的并发颈脊髓病的临床疗效。
    方法:前瞻性,随机化,控制,进行了非劣效性试验.样本包括131例患者,他们在2021年9月至2022年9月期间接受了UBE或ACDF。将具有颈神经根或共存脊髓压迫症状和影像学定义的单侧颈神经根病或单侧颈椎间盘突出症引起的并发颈脊髓病的患者随机分为两组:UBE组(n=63)和ACDF组(n=68)。手术时间,失血,手术后住院时间,记录围手术期并发症。术前和术后改良日本骨科协会(mJOA)量表评分,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分,mJOA的恢复率(RR)用于评估临床结局。
    结果:接受UBE治疗的患者术后住院时间明显短于接受ACDF治疗的患者(p<0.05)。颈部或手臂VAS评分无显著差异,NDI得分,MJOA得分,或两组间mJOA的平均RR(p<0.05)。两组仅观察到轻度并发症,无显著性差异(p=0.30)。
    结论:UBE可显著缓解疼痛和残疾,无严重并发症,大多数患者对这种技术感到满意。因此,该手术可安全有效地替代ACDF用于治疗单侧颈神经根病或单侧颈椎间盘突出症引起的并发颈脊髓病.
    背景:这项研究于2023年2月08日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(http://www.chictr.org.cn,#ChiCTR2300074273)。
    BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylosis (CS), including myelopathy and radiculopathy, is the most common degenerative cervical spine disease. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) compared to those of conventional anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for treating unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy induced by unilateral cervical herniated discs.
    METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial was conducted. The sample consisted of 131 patients who underwent UBE or ACDF was conducted between September 2021 and September 2022. Patients with cervical nerve roots or coexisting spinal cord compression symptoms and imaging-defined unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy induced by unilateral cervical herniated discs were randomized into two groups: a UBE group (n = 63) and an ACDF group (n = 68). The operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay after surgery, and perioperative complications were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, neck disability index (NDI) scores, and recovery rate (RR) of the mJOA were utilized to evaluate clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: The hospital stay after surgery was significantly shorter in patients treated with UBE than in those treated with ACDF (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the neck or arm VAS score, NDI score, mJOA score, or mean RR of the mJOA between the two groups (p < 0.05). Only mild complications were observed in both groups, with no significant difference (p = 0.30).
    CONCLUSIONS: UBE can significantly relieve pain and disability without severe complications, and most patients are satisfied with this technique. Consequently, this procedure can be used safely and effectively as an alternative to ACDF for treating unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy induced by unilateral cervical herniated discs.
    BACKGROUND: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 02/08/2023 ( http://www.chictr.org.cn , #ChiCTR2300074273).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:选择性神经根阻滞(SNRB)可作为腰椎神经根性疼痛的治疗和诊断工具。大多数研究仅通过其与疼痛减轻的关系来评估SNRB的效果。众所周知,疼痛与抑郁等其他因素有关,焦虑,不活动和睡眠障碍,但这些与患者相关的结局很少被评估.这项研究评估了SNRB对疼痛相关结果的影响,包括抑郁症。焦虑,疲劳,疼痛干扰,活动和睡眠。
    方法:用SNRB治疗130例腰椎神经根性疼痛患者。SNRB后12周(84天)用PROMIS-29评估患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。在14天的随访中,根据患者的疼痛减轻情况将患者分层为响应者(疼痛减轻≥30%)和非响应者(疼痛减轻<30%)。使用Kaplan-Meier分析估计治疗后持续时间,其中返回基线作为事件。使用配对t检验以特定的时间间隔比较治疗前和治疗后的反应。
    结果:44%(n=45)的患者是应答者,在整个84天的随访中,所有参数均有显着改善。唯一的例外是在第70天失去意义的睡眠。应答者的平均治疗后持续时间为59(52-67)天。无反应者在第35天之前的疼痛干扰和疼痛强度以及在21天之前的社会参与能力方面显示出显着改善。
    结论:SNRB可以改善疼痛强度,疼痛干扰,物理功能,疲劳,焦虑,抑郁症,睡眠障碍和参与社会角色的能力。
    OBJECTIVE: Selective nerve root blocks (SNRB) are used both as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool for lumbar radicular pain. Most studies evaluate the effect of SNRB simply by its relation to pain reduction. It is well known that pain is associated with other factors such as depression, anxiety, inactivity and sleeping disorders, but these patient-related outcomes are seldom evaluated. This study evaluated the influence of SNRB on pain-related outcomes including depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, activity and sleep.
    METHODS: One hundred three patients with lumbar radicular pain were treated with a SNRB. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed with the PROMIS-29 for 12 weeks (84 days) following the SNRB. Patients were stratified based on their pain reduction at the 14-day follow up as responders (≥ 30% pain reduction) and non-responders (< 30% pain reduction). Post-treatment duration was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis with return to baseline as an event. A paired t-test was used to compare pre- and post-treatment responses at specific time intervals.
    RESULTS: Forty-four percent (n = 45) of the patients were responders and showed significant improvement in all parameters throughout the 84-days follow-up, the exception was sleep that lost significance at day 70. The mean post-treatment duration among responders was 59 (52-67) days. Non-responders showed significant improvements in pain interference and pain intensity until day 35 and in ability for social participation until 21-day.
    CONCLUSIONS: SNRB can improve pain intensity, pain interference, physical function, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and the ability to participate in social roles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    椎间盘突出症(IVDH)是犬常见的脊柱疾病,显著影响他们的健康,移动性,和整体福祉。这项研究开始努力在兽医MRI扫描中自动检测和定位IVDH病变,利用先进的人工智能(AI)方法。一个全面的犬IVDH数据集,包括来自213只不同品种的宠物狗的T2加权矢状MRI图像,年龄,和尺寸,编译并用于训练和测试IVDH检测模型。实验结果表明,传统的两阶段检测模型可靠地优于一阶段检测模型,包括最近的你只看一次X(YOLOX)探测器。在方法论方面,这项研究引入了一种新颖的脊柱定位模块,成功集成到不同的对象检测模型中,以增强IVDH检测,达到平均精度(AP)高达75.32%。此外,研究了迁移学习以适应较小的猫科动物数据集的IVDH检测模型。总的来说,这项研究为推进兽医护理人工智能提供了见解,确定挑战并探索兽医放射学未来发展的潜在策略。
    Intervertebral Disc Herniation (IVDH) is a common spinal disease in dogs, significantly impacting their health, mobility, and overall well-being. This study initiates an effort to automate the detection and localization of IVDH lesions in veterinary MRI scans, utilizing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) methods. A comprehensive canine IVDH dataset, comprising T2-weighted sagittal MRI images from 213 pet dogs of various breeds, ages, and sizes, was compiled and utilized to train and test the IVDH detection models. The experimental results showed that traditional two-stage detection models reliably outperformed one-stage models, including the recent You Only Look Once X (YOLOX) detector. In terms of methodology, this study introduced a novel spinal localization module, successfully integrated into different object detection models to enhance IVDH detection, achieving an average precision (AP) of up to 75.32%. Additionally, transfer learning was explored to adapt the IVDH detection model for a smaller feline dataset. Overall, this study provides insights into advancing AI for veterinary care, identifying challenges and exploring potential strategies for future development in veterinary radiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术下背痛是普通人群中的常见问题。对于没有严重疼痛和严重运动无力的患者,药物治疗是首选。如果患者不能从保守治疗中获益,建议进行微创治疗。臭氧核溶解最近被用于减轻椎间盘突出和其他脊柱疾病中的疼痛和炎症。这项来自单个中心的回顾性研究旨在评估2022年至2024年149例腰椎间盘突出症患者的臭氧椎间盘核溶解治疗效果。材料与方法2022年至2024年间,149例接受药物治疗和物理治疗但无手术指征但未受益的患者在手术室C臂镜检查下进行了盘内臭氧核溶解,并对结果进行回顾性评估.术前记录视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分,在1个月时,3个月,6个月,和1年。结果本研究纳入149例患者,包括61名男性和88名女性,总体平均年龄为43.9±4.7岁。该程序在138例患者中为1级,在11例患者中为2级。在根据腰椎MRI检查结果接受手术的患者中,15涉及L3-L4椎间盘,3涉及L3-L4和L4-L5光盘,90涉及L4-L5光盘,31涉及L5-S1光盘。术后1个月和6个月VAS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后ODI评分在1个月和6个月也有显著差异。结论由于其并发症发生率低,治疗腰椎间盘突出症的有效性,对于没有手术指征或不接受手术干预且未从药物治疗和物理治疗中受益的患者,应考虑使用臭氧化学核溶解术。
    BACKGROUND Lower back pain is a common problem in the general population. Medical treatment is the first choice for patients without severe pain and major motor weakness. If patients do not benefit from conservative treatment, minimally invasive treatment is recommended. Ozone nucleolysis has recently been used to reduce pain and inflammation in herniated discs and other spinal conditions. This retrospective study from a single center aimed to evaluate the effects of ozone disc nucleolysis in the management of 149 patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs from 2022 to 2024. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2022 and 2024, intradiscal ozone nucleolysis was performed under operating room C-arm scopy in 149 patients who received medical treatment and physical therapy without surgical indication but did not benefit, and the results were evaluated retrospectively. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were recorded before the procedure, and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS The study enrolled 149 patients, comprising 61 males and 88 females, with an overall mean age of 43.9±4.7 years. The procedure was performed as 1 level in 138 patients and 2 levels in 11 patients. Among patients who underwent procedures based on lumbar MRI findings, 15 involved the L3-L4 intervertebral disc, 3 involved both the L3-L4 and L4-L5 discs, 90 involved the L4-L5 disc, and 31 involved the L5-S1 disc. Post-procedure VAS scores were significantly different at 1 month and 6 months (P<0.05). Post-procedure ODI scores were also significantly different at 1 month and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS Due to its low complication rate and effectiveness in treating lumbar disc herniation, ozone chemonucleolysis should be considered for use in patients who do not have a surgical indication or do not accept surgical intervention and did not benefit from medical treatment and physical therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的发病率呈逐年上升趋势,影响年轻年龄组的新兴趋势。本研究旨在探讨二仙汤联合耳穴贴压治疗LDH的临床疗效。我们的目标是提供证据支持在临床环境中纳入中医(TCM)康复技术。
    方法:这项随机对照试验纳入了102名诊断为LDH的患者,并将他们分为对照组和干预组。对照组进行为期2周的康复治疗,干预组在对照组的基础上接受二仙汤和耳穴贴压治疗。主要结局指标包括3个量表-视觉模拟量表(VAS),日本骨科协会(JOA),和Oswestry残疾指数-以及3种炎症标志物:C反应蛋白(CRP),白细胞介素-6(IL-6),和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)。此外,评估压力痛阈值和疼痛耐受阈值.参与者在基线时进行评估,在14天,治疗后28天。
    结果:治疗2周后,对照组和干预组均表现出VAS的显着改善,JOA,ODI,CRP,IL-6,TNF-α,压力痛阈值,和疼痛耐受阈值(P<0.05)。这些改善在VAS的28天中持续存在,JOA,和ODI得分(P<0.05)。在14天,在VAS方面,干预组显示出明显优于对照组的结果,JOA,ODI,CRP,TNF-α,和压力痛阈值(P<0.05)。
    结论:与常规康复治疗相比,二仙汤联合耳穴贴压治疗在缓解LDH患者症状方面具有明显的益处。这种方法提供了新的观点,并为未来LDH的治疗策略提供了证据。
    OBJECTIVE: The incidence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is on the rise annually, with an emerging trend of affecting younger age groups. This study aims to investigate the clinical effectiveness of combining Erxian decoction with auricular acupoint pressure therapy in treating LDH. Our objective is to furnish evidence supporting the incorporation of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) rehabilitation techniques in clinical settings.
    METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 102 patients diagnosed with LDH and allocated them into Control and Intervention groups. The Control group underwent a 2-week rehabilitation regimen, whereas the Intervention group received an augmented treatment comprising Erxian decoction along with auricular acupoint pressure therapy based on the Control group. Main outcome measures included 3 scales - visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and Oswestry Disability Index - as well as 3 inflammatory markers: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Additionally, pressure pain threshold and pain tolerance threshold values were evaluated. Participants were assessed at baseline, on 14-day, and on 28-day posttreatment.
    RESULTS: After 2 weeks of treatment, both the Control and Intervention groups exhibited significant improvements in the VAS, JOA, ODI, CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, pressure pain threshold, and pain tolerance threshold (P < .05). These improvements persisted at the 28-day in the VAS, JOA, and ODI scores (P < .05). On 14-day, the Intervention group showed significantly better outcomes compared to the Control group in terms of the VAS, JOA, ODI, CRP, TNF-α, and pressure pain threshold (P < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional rehabilitation therapy, the combination of Erxian decoction and auricular acupoint pressure therapy demonstrates clear benefits in alleviating symptoms in patients with LDH. This approach offers fresh perspectives and substantiates evidence for future treatment strategies in managing LDH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:目前,目前尚无针对腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的具体类型选择经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)或传统经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)的既定指南.基于密歇根州立大学(MSU)分类系统,这项研究首次对两种手术方法进行了5年以上的中长期随访分析,旨在提供经验证据,以协助在LDH治疗手术前做出更明智的决定。
    方法:这是一项回顾性研究,包括2016年1月1日至2018年12月31日在我院接受PELD或TLIF治疗的273例单水平LDH患者。详细指标包括术前和术后1天的视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),1周,1年,5年随访。并发症,复发,并记录术后5年改良的MacNab标准评分.统计方法包括独立样本t检验,重复测量方差分析(ANOVA),和χ2检验。
    结果:根据MSU分类分为七组,发现在4次术后随访中,VAS和ODI评分均有改善(p<0.001).PELD在减轻疼痛和改善3B分类中的ODI评分方面比TLIF表现出更好的结果,2B,和2C(p<0.05)。TLIF在2A中表现出优于PELD的一致优势,2AB,3A,和3AB分类(p<0.05)。PELD组术后5年内总复发率(11.05%)高于TLIF组(3.96%)。这些主要集中在2A,2AB,3A,和3AB类型。此外,PELD的优良率高于TLIF,但差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.0568,p=0.5895)。
    结论:这项研究表明PELD和TLIF可以缓解LDH,但在不同的MSU分类下具有优势。MSU分类具有特定的指导意义,可以帮助选择PELD或TLIF的手术方式,以实现腰椎间盘突出症患者的最佳治疗效果。
    OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no established guideline on whether to opt for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) or traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery based on specific types of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Based on the Michigan State University (MSU) classification system, this study conducted a medium- to long-term follow-up analysis of two surgical methods over 5 years for the first time, aiming to provide empirical evidence to assist in making more informed decisions before surgery for LDH treatment.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 273 patients with single-level LDH who underwent PELD or TLIF treatment at our hospital between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Detailed metrics included preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at 1-day, 1-week, 1-year, and 5-year follow-ups. Complications, recurrences, and 5-year postoperative modified MacNab criteria scores were also recorded. Statistical methods included independent sample t-tests, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and χ2 tests.
    RESULTS: Classified into seven groups according to the MSU classification, it was found that there was an improvement in the VAS and ODI scores at four postoperative follow-ups (p < 0.001). PELD showed better results than TLIF in reducing pain and improving the ODI scores in the classifications of 3B, 2B, and 2C (p < 0.05). TLIF demonstrated consistent superiority over PELD in 2A, 2AB, 3A, and 3AB classifications (p < 0.05). The total recurrence rate in the PELD group (11.05%) within 5 years after surgery was higher (p < 0.05) than that in the TLIF group (3.96%). These were mainly concentrated in the 2A, 2AB, 3A, and 3AB types. Moreover, the rate of excellent and good outcomes in the PELD was higher than in the TLIF but no significant difference (χ2 = 1.0568, p = 0.5895).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PELD and TLIF may relieve LDH, but have advantages under different MSU classifications. The MSU classification has specific guiding significance and could aid in the surgical selection of PELD or TLIF to achieve optimal treatment outcomes for patients with lumbar disc herniation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号