Intervertebral Disc Displacement

椎间盘移位
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Modic变化(MC)被确定为下腰痛的独立危险因素。不同亚型的MC对术后疼痛缓解的影响不同。然而,对于具有不同MC亚型的患者术后MC分数的转变,缺乏共识。
    这项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析搜索了PubMed中的英语文章,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,和Embase数据库,直到2024年1月。研究的重点是椎间盘切除术后在各种微裂纹亚型之间过渡的患者。主要结果指标是术后不同微裂纹分数之间的转换。
    分析了8项689名参与者的研究。总的来说,有中等至高质量的证据表明不同MC亚型的MC转换发生率存在差异.MC转换的总发生率为27.7%,比率为37.0%,20.5%,MC0、MC1和MC2亚型为19.1%,分别。因此,术后MC型转变,特别是从术前MC0到MC1(17.7%)或MC2(13.1%),更常见,以MC1变换为主。术前合并症MC1型(19.0%)的患者比MC2型(12.4%)的患者术后转变更多。
    这项研究强调了分析腰椎间盘突出症患者椎间盘切除术后MC的重要性,显示腰椎椎间盘切除术后MC的发病率较高,特别是从术前缺乏MC到MC1或MC2。术前MC0型比MC1或MC2型组合更容易发生术后MC转化。这些发现对于提高手术效果和术后护理至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Modic changes (MCs) are identified as an independent risk factor for low back pain. Different subtypes of MCs vary in their impact on postoperative pain relief. However, consensus on the transformation of postoperative MC fractions in patients with distinct MC subtypes is lacking.
    UNASSIGNED: This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis searched English-language articles in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases until January 2024. Studies included focused on patients transitioning between various microcrack subtypes post-discectomy. The primary outcome measure was the transformation between different postoperative microcrack fractions.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight studies with 689 participants were analyzed. Overall, there is moderate to high-quality evidence indicating differences in the incidence of MC conversion across MC subtypes. The overall incidence of MC conversion was 27.7%, with rates of 37.0%, 20.5%, and 19.1% for MC0, MC1, and MC2 subtypes, respectively. Thus, postoperative MC type transformation, particularly from preoperative MC0 to MC1 (17.7%) or MC2 (13.1%), was more common, with MC1 transformation being predominant. Patients with preoperative comorbid MC1 types (19.0%) exhibited more postoperative transitions than those with MC2 types (12.4%).
    UNASSIGNED: This study underscores the significance of analyzing post-discectomy MCs in patients with lumbar disc herniation, revealing a higher incidence of MCs post-lumbar discectomy, particularly from preoperative absence of MC to MC1 or MC2. Preoperative MC0 types were more likely to undergo postoperative MC transformation than combined MC1 or MC2 types. These findings are crucial for enhancing surgical outcomes and postoperative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腰椎间盘突出症(HLDs)引起的下腰痛和坐骨神经痛是就诊于疼痛诊所的患者常见的主诉。在各种治疗方法中,盘内臭氧注射已成为HLDs的有效替代或额外治疗选择。
    这项荟萃分析旨在研究椎间盘内注射臭氧治疗HLDs的有效性。
    我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,以及截至2024年1月25日发表的相关研究的Scopus数据库。我们纳入了研究盘内臭氧注射对HLDs患者的疗效的研究。我们使用Cochrane协作工具评估了各个研究的方法学质量。
    治疗后6个月,对患有HLDs的患者进行盘内臭氧注射的治疗效果大于类固醇注射的治疗效果(治疗成功率,6个月:比值比=3.95,95%置信区间[CI][2.44,6.39],P<0.01)或常规药物(视觉模拟量表[VAS]的变化,6个月:标准化平均差[SMD]=1.65,95%CI[1.08,2.22],P<0.01;12个月:SMD=1.52,95%CI[0.96,2.08],P<0.01),但与显微椎间盘切除术相似(VAS的变化,18个月:SMD=-0.05,95%CI[-0.67,0.57],P=0.87)。治疗后<6个月,盘内臭氧注射后VAS评分的降低高于类固醇注射后(VAS的变化,1个月:SMD=2.53,95%CI[1.84,3.21],P<0.01)。
    盘内臭氧注射可能是HLDs患者的有用治疗工具。与类固醇注射和口服药物等其他常规治疗方法相比,盘内臭氧注射有很大的长期(6个月)的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: Low back pain and sciatica caused by herniated lumbar discs (HLDs) are common complaints among patients visiting pain clinics. Among the various therapeutic methods, intradiscal ozone injections have emerged as an effective alternative or additional treatment option for HLDs.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of intradiscal ozone injections in the treatment of HLDs.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for relevant studies published until January 25, 2024. We included studies that investigated the efficacy of intradiscal ozone injections in patients with HLDs. We evaluated the methodological quality of individual studies using the Cochrane Collaboration tool.
    UNASSIGNED: At ⩾ 6 months after treatment, the therapeutic effect of intradiscal ozone injections in patients with HLDs was greater than that of steroid injections (treatment success rate, 6 months: odds ratio = 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.44, 6.39], P< 0.01) or conventional medications (changes in the Visual Analog Scale [VAS], 6 months: standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.65, 95% CI [1.08, 2.22], P< 0.01; 12 months: SMD = 1.52, 95% CI [0.96, 2.08], P< 0.01) but similar to that of microdiscectomy (changes in VAS, 18 months: SMD =-0.05, 95% CI [-0.67, 0.57], P= 0.87). At < 6 months after treatment, the reduction in the VAS score after intradiscal ozone injections was higher than that after steroid injections (changes in VAS, 1 month: SMD = 2.53, 95% CI [1.84, 3.21], P< 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: Intradiscal ozone injections may be a useful therapeutic tool in patients with HLDs. Compared with other conventional treatment methods such as steroid injections and oral medications, intradiscal ozone injection has great long-term (⩾ 6 months) effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)通常通过手术治疗。酶化学核溶解术是一种非手术方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估化学核酸分解酶对LDH的疗效和安全性。主要目标是通过“治疗成功”(即,疼痛减轻)和严重不良事件(SAE)发生率。此外,探讨了化学核酸分解酶在疗效和安全性趋势上的差异.根据我们的PROSPERO注册协议(CRD42023451546)和PRISMA指南,截至2023年7月18日,对PubMed和WebofScience数据库进行了系统搜索。纳入标准涉及用酶化学核酸溶解试剂治疗人LDH,评估疼痛缓解,成像变化,并报告SAE,专注于过敏反应。质量评估采用Cochrane偏差源和MINORS工具。Meta分析利用比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。在纳入的62项研究(12,368例患者)中,化学核溶解术显示79%的治疗成功率,显著优于安慰剂对照组(OR3.35,95%CI2.41-4.65),评分与手术干预相似(OR0.65,95%CI0.20-2.10).严重不良事件发生在1.4%的病例中,木瓜蛋白酶队列中的比率略高。化学核溶解和对照组之间的“进行手术”率没有显着差异。局限性包括过时的和异质的研究,强调需要更高质量的试验。通过仔细的患者选择和治疗实施的进展进一步优化可以进一步增强结果。观察到的益处需要更广泛的临床探索和采用。这次审查没有收到任何资金。
    Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is often managed surgically. Enzymatic chemonucleolysis emerged as a non-surgical alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of chemonucleolytic enzymes for LDH. The primary objective is to evaluate efficacy through \"treatment success\" (i.e., pain reduction) and severe adverse events (SAEs) rates. Additionally, differences in efficacy and safety trends among chemonucleolytic enzymes are explored. Following our PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42023451546) and PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted up to July 18, 2023. Inclusion criteria involved human LDH treatment with enzymatic chemonucleolysis reagents, assessing pain alleviation, imaging changes, and reporting on SAEs, with focus on allergic reactions. Quality assessment employed the Cochrane Source of Bias and MINORS tools. Meta-analysis utilized odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among 62 included studies (12,368 patients), chemonucleolysis demonstrated an 79% treatment success rate and significantly outperformed placebo controls (OR 3.35, 95% CI 2.41-4.65) and scored similar to surgical interventions (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.20-2.10). SAEs occurred in 1.4% of cases, with slightly higher rates in chymopapain cohorts. No significant differences in \"proceeding to surgery\" rates were observed between chemonucleolysis and control cohorts. Limitations include dated and heterogeneous studies, emphasizing the need for higher-quality trials. Further optimization through careful patient selection and advances in therapy implementation may further enhance outcomes. The observed benefits call for wider clinical exploration and adoption. No funding was received for this review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    方法:一名52岁男子在一次摩托车事故后出现马尾综合症。磁共振成像显示外伤性椎间盘突出,在L2-L3和L5-S1水平无骨损伤。在2个月的随访中,他通过两个级别的广泛椎板切除术和显微椎间盘切除术成功治疗,神经系统完全恢复。
    结论:报告的发病率为0.4%,腰椎区域的外伤性椎间盘突出是一种罕见的现象,在急性创伤中可能类似于脊髓硬膜外血肿。尽管MRI可能无法可靠地区分脊髓硬膜外血肿和椎间盘突出症,严重的神经功能缺损可能需要紧急手术干预。
    METHODS: A 52-year-old man presented with cauda equina syndrome after a motorcycle accident. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed traumatic disc herniation, at L2-L3 and L5-S1 levels without bony injury. He was managed successfully by wide laminectomy and microdiscectomy at both levels with complete neurological recovery at 2-month follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: With a reported incidence of 0.4%, traumatic disc herniation in the lumbar region is an uncommon occurrence that may resemble a spinal epidural hematoma in acute trauma. Although MRI may not reliably differentiate spinal epidural hematoma from disc herniation, urgent surgical intervention may be required in profound neurological deficits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Brown-Séquard综合征(BSS)是一种罕见的不完全性脊髓损伤,其特征是同侧运动缺陷和对侧感觉丧失。BSS通常与创伤性病因有关,但也应考虑非创伤性原因。一名38岁的女性出现了3周的右上肢无力史,在过去的一个半星期里,她的左上肢和下肢出现了麻木和刺痛,还有一些运动困难。影像学显示C3-C4水平的右中旁椎间盘突出,导致严重的椎管狭窄并导致异常的脊髓信号。患者随后接受了C3-4宫颈全椎间盘置换术。手术期间放置的Hemovac在术后第一天被移除,并通过PT/OT对她进行了重新评估,并建议在术后第二天进行门诊治疗。我们的案子,以及对文献的回顾,强调BSS的非创伤性原因应被视为BSS的原因。由颈椎间盘突出产生的BSS极为罕见,经常被误诊。
    Brown-Séquard Syndrome (BSS) is a rare form of incomplete spinal cord injury and is characterized by ipsilateral motor deficit and contralateral sensory loss. BSS is commonly associated with traumatic etiologies, but non-traumatic causes should be considered as well. A 38-year-old woman presented with a 3-week history of weakness in her right upper extremity, and she has developed numbness and tingling in her left upper and lower extremities over the past week and a half, along with some motor difficulty. Imaging showed a large right paracentral disc protrusion at the C3-C4 level causing severe spinal canal narrowing and resulting in abnormal cord signal. The patient subsequently underwent a C3-4 cervical total disk replacement. Hemovac placed during surgery was removed on post-op day one, and she was re-evaluated by PT/OT and recommended for outpatient therapies on post-op day two. Our case, along with a review of the literature, highlights those non-traumatic causes of BSS should be considered as a cause of BSS. BSS produced by a herniated cervical disc is extremely rare and is often misdiagnosed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估全内镜经椎间孔髓核摘除术(FETD)对肥胖和非肥胖腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者临床结局和并发症的影响。
    方法:在2023年11月18日之前,对各种主要数据库进行了相关文献的系统搜索。评估手术时间和住院时间。临床结果包括术前和术后Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分,进行描述术后3个月和最后随访期间的改善情况,分别。并发症也有记录。
    结果:四项符合纳入标准的回顾性研究提供了258例患者的集体队列。与非肥胖患者相比,肥胖患者接受FETD的手术时间明显更长(P=0.0003)。相反,住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后3个月和最终随访时,VAS对背部和腿部疼痛评分的改善,术后3个月和最终随访时ODI的改善。此外,肥胖组术后并发症的总发生率较高(P=0.02).肥胖组的并发症总发生率为17.17%,显著高于非肥胖组中观察到的9.43%的较低比率。
    结论:与非肥胖人群相比,在肥胖人群中使用FETD治疗LDH与延长手术时间和较高的总并发症发生率相关。然而,它仍然是治疗肥胖背景下腰椎间盘突出症的安全有效的手术干预措施。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of full endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (FETD) on clinical outcomes and complications in both obese and non-obese patients presenting with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
    METHODS: A systematic search of relevant literature was conducted across various primary databases until November 18, 2023. Operative time and hospitalization were evaluated. Clinical outcomes included preoperative and postoperative assessments of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, conducted to delineate improvements at 3 months postoperatively and during the final follow-up, respectively. Complications were also documented.
    RESULTS: Four retrospective studies meeting inclusion criteria provided a collective cohort of 258 patients. Obese patients undergoing FETD experienced significantly longer operative times compared to non-obese counterparts (P = 0.0003). Conversely, no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in hospitalization duration, improvement of VAS for back and leg pain scores at 3 months postoperatively and final follow-up, improvement of ODI at 3 months postoperatively and final follow-up. Furthermore, the overall rate of postoperative complications was higher in the obese group (P = 0.02). The obese group demonstrated a total incidence of complications of 17.17%, notably higher than the lower rate of 9.43% observed in the non-obese group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of FETD for managing LDH in individuals with obesity is associated with prolonged operative times and a higher total complication rate compared to their non-obese counterparts. Nevertheless, it remains a safe and effective surgical intervention for treating herniated lumbar discs in the context of obesity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较单侧双孔内窥镜椎间盘切除术(UBED)与显微椎间盘切除术(MD)治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的疗效。
    方法:在Embase进行了全面的文献检索,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,CNKI,和WebofScience数据库从数据库开始到2023年4月,以确定比较UBED和MD治疗LDH的研究。本研究评估了视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),Macnab得分,操作时间,估计失血量,住院,和并发症,估计失血量,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),和Macnab评分在不同的术前和术后阶段。Meta分析采用RevMan5.4软件进行。
    结果:荟萃分析包括9项不同的研究,共1001名患者。术后1-3个月(P=0.09)和最终随访(P=0.13)两组之间下腰痛的VAS评分没有显着差异;但是,UBED组术后1~3天的VAS评分较低(P=0.02).基线时腿部疼痛VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P=0.05)。术后1-3天(P=0.24),术后1~3个月(P=0.78),或最终随访时(P=0.43)。ODI比较显示术前无显著差异(P=0.83),术后1周(P=0.47),或术后1-3个月(P=0.13),UBED组在最终随访时表现出更好的ODI(P=0.03)。UBED组的平均手术时间也较短(P=0.03),显著缩短住院时间(P<0.00001),和较少的估计失血(P=0.0002)。并发症和改良的MacNab评分在两组之间没有显着差异(分别为P=0.56和P=0.05)。
    结论:证据显示UBED和MD治疗LDH的疗效无显著差异。然而,UBED可能会提供潜在的好处,例如缩短住院时间,较低的估计失血量,和相当的并发症发生率。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBED) with microdiscectomy (MD) for treating lumbar disk herniation (LDH).
    METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Web of Science databases from database inception to April 2023 to identify studies comparing UBED and MD for treating LDH. This study evaluated the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Macnab scores, operation time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and complications, estimated blood loss, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Macnab scores at various pre- and post-surgery stages. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.
    RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 9 distinct studies with a total of 1001 patients. The VAS scores for low back pain showed no significant differences between the groups at postoperative 1-3 months (P = 0.09) and final follow-up (P = 0.13); however, the UBED group had lower VAS scores at postoperative 1-3 days (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in leg pain VAS scores at baseline (P = 0.05), postoperative 1-3 days (P = 0.24), postoperative 1-3 months (P = 0.78), or at the final follow-up (P = 0.43). ODI comparisons revealed no significant differences preoperatively (P = 0.83), at postoperative 1 week (P = 0.47), or postoperative 1-3 months (P = 0.13), and the UBED group demonstrated better ODI at the final follow-up (P = 0.03). The UBED group also exhibited a shorter mean operative time (P = 0.03), significantly shorter hospital stay (P < 0.00001), and less estimated blood loss (P = 0.0002). Complications and modified MacNab scores showed no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.56 and P = 0.05, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: The evidence revealed no significant differences in efficacy between UBED and MD for LDH treatment. However, UBED may offer potential benefits such as shorter hospital stays, lower estimated blood loss, and comparable complication rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous blood product containing growth factors and proteins, widely employed in the clinical setting for tissue repair. Robust evidence in basic science literature has facilitated clinical research involving PRP for patients with disc disease and lumbar pain. Degenerative disc disease (DDD) has been identified as a significant contributor to lower back pain, with approximately 40% of patients under 30 and 90% of those over 50 experiencing lumbar pain showing MRI findings consistent with degenerative changes in intervertebral discs. Regenerative medicine within the disc has primarily been studied in patients with chronic, untreatable lumbar pain. Objective: to understand the available evidence regarding the efficacy of PRP in lumbar disc herniation. By understanding the scientific evidence supporting PRP as a lumbar disc herniation treatment, a research project can be developed, providing the theoretical foundation for implementing this therapy in the Mexican population. A search was conducted using PUBMED, ClinicalKey (Elsevier), Medscape, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. Conclusions: despite promising results in several studies on intradiscal PRP injection, small sample sizes and non-standardized graft preparation procedures have hindered these research efforts.
    El plasma rico en plaquetas (PRP) es un producto sanguíneo autólogo que contiene factores de crecimiento y proteínas y se ha utilizado en todo el entorno clínico para la reparación de tejidos. La fuerte evidencia en la literatura de ciencias básicas ha permitido la investigación clínica que involucra PRP para pacientes con enfermedad del disco y dolor lumbar. La enfermedad degenerativa del disco (DDD) se ha establecido como un importante contribuyente a la causa del dolor lumbar: aproximadamente el 40% de los pacientes menores de 30 años y el 90% de los pacientes mayores de 50 años que tienen dolor lumbar también muestran hallazgos de imágenes de resonancia magnética (IRM) que son consistentes con cambios degenerativos dentro de los discos intervertebrales. La medicina regenerativa intradiscal se ha estudiado principalmente en pacientes con dolor lumbar crónico intratable. Objetivo: conocer la evidencia disponible sobre la eficacia del PRP en hernias de disco lumbar. Al conocer la evidencia científica disponible del PRP como tratamiento de hernia discal lumbar se podrá desarrollar un proyecto de investigación, lo cual sustentará las bases teóricas para realizar esta terapia en la población mexicana. Se realizó búsqueda en base de datos PUBMED, ClinicalKey (Elsevier), Medscape, Science Direct, Google Scholar. Conclusiones: aunque varias investigaciones han arrojado resultados prometedores con respecto a la inyección intradiscal de PRP los tamaños de muestra pequeños y los procedimientos de preparación de injertos no estandarizados obstaculizaron estos esfuerzos de investigación.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号