Intervertebral Disc Displacement

椎间盘移位
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是从生物力学的角度探讨前路经皮经皮内窥镜颈椎间盘切除术(ATc-PECD)对颈椎的长期影响。
    方法:使用有限元方法建立了正常颈椎C2-T1的三维模型。随后,在正常模型的基础上构建椎间盘退变模型和手术退变模型。相同的加载条件用于模拟屈曲,扩展,颈椎的侧向弯曲和轴向旋转。我们计算了颈椎活动范围(ROM),椎间盘内压,不同运动下的椎体内压,观察颈椎术后生物力学的变化。同时,我们结合了ATc-PECD的长期随访结果,并使用成像方法测量椎骨和椎间盘的高度以及颈椎的活动度,使用日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估疼痛缓解和神经功能恢复.
    结果:长期随访结果显示,术前JOA评分,颈部VAS评分,手VAS评分,IDH,VBH,患者的ROM分别为9.49±2.16、6.34±1.68、5.14±1.48、5.95±0.22mm,15.41±1.68mm,和52.46±9.36°。变化为15.71±1.13(P<0.05),1.02±0.82(P<0.05),0.77±0.76(P<0.05),4.73±0.26mm(P<0.05),13.67±1.48mm(P<0.05),59.26±6.72°(P<0.05),分别,术后6年。有限元分析表明,建立颈椎病模型后,屈曲的整体运动范围,扩展,横向弯曲,旋转减少了3.298°,0.753°,3.852°,和1.131°。相反,建立骨隧道模型后,这些动作的运动范围增加了0.843°,0.65°,0.278°,和0.488°,与随访结果一致。此外,节段运动变化的分析表明,颈椎活动度的增加主要是由手术模型节段造成的。此外,有限元模型表明,骨隧道可能导致椎体和椎间盘内的应力增加手术段。
    结论:长期随访研究表明ATc-PECD具有良好的临床疗效,ATc-PECD可作为CDH治疗的补充方法。FEM表明,ATc-PECD可导致手术节段椎体和椎间盘内应力增加,与ATc-PECD术后颈椎退变直接相关。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term consequences on the cervical spine after Anterior transcorporeal percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy (ATc-PECD) from the biomechanical standpoint.
    METHODS: A three-dimensional model of the normal cervical spine C2-T1 was established using finite element method. Subsequently, a disc degeneration model and degeneration with surgery model were constructed on the basis of the normal model. The same loading conditions were applied to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation of the cervical spine. We calculated the cervical range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, and intravertebral body pressure under different motions for observing changes in cervical spine biomechanics after surgery. At the same time, we combined the results of a long-term follow-up of the ATc-PECD, and used imaging methods to measure vertebral and disc height and cervical mobility, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used to assess pain relief and neurological functional recovery.
    RESULTS: The long-term follow-up results revealed that preoperative JOA score, neck VAS score, hand VAS score, IDH, VBH, and ROM for patients were 9.49 ± 2.16, 6.34 ± 1.68, 5.14 ± 1.48, 5.95 ± 0.22 mm, 15.41 ± 1.68 mm, and 52.46 ± 9.36° respectively. It changed to 15.71 ± 1.13 (P < 0.05), 1.02 ± 0.82 (P < 0.05), 0.77 ± 0.76 (P < 0.05), 4.73 ± 0.26 mm (P < 0.05), 13.67 ± 1.48 mm (P < 0.05), and 59.26 ± 6.72° (P < 0.05), respectively, at 6 years postoperatively. Finite element analysis showed that after establishing the cervical spondylosis model, the overall motion range for flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation decreased by 3.298°, 0.753°, 3.852°, and 1.131° respectively. Conversely, after establishing the bone tunnel model, the motion range for these actions increased by 0.843°, 0.65°, 0.278°, and 0.488° respectively, consistent with the follow-up results. Moreover, analysis of segmental motion changes revealed that the increased cervical spine mobility was primarily contributed by the surgical model segments. Additionally, the finite element model demonstrated that bone tunneling could lead to increased stress within the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs of the surgical segments.
    CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up studies have shown that ATc-PECD has good clinical efficacy and that ATc-PECD can be used as a complementary method for CDH treatment. The FEM demonstrated that ATc-PECD can lead to increased internal stresses in the vertebral body and intervertebral discs of the operated segments, which is directly related to cervical spine degeneration after ATc-PECD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Modic变化(MC)被确定为下腰痛的独立危险因素。不同亚型的MC对术后疼痛缓解的影响不同。然而,对于具有不同MC亚型的患者术后MC分数的转变,缺乏共识。
    这项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析搜索了PubMed中的英语文章,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,和Embase数据库,直到2024年1月。研究的重点是椎间盘切除术后在各种微裂纹亚型之间过渡的患者。主要结果指标是术后不同微裂纹分数之间的转换。
    分析了8项689名参与者的研究。总的来说,有中等至高质量的证据表明不同MC亚型的MC转换发生率存在差异.MC转换的总发生率为27.7%,比率为37.0%,20.5%,MC0、MC1和MC2亚型为19.1%,分别。因此,术后MC型转变,特别是从术前MC0到MC1(17.7%)或MC2(13.1%),更常见,以MC1变换为主。术前合并症MC1型(19.0%)的患者比MC2型(12.4%)的患者术后转变更多。
    这项研究强调了分析腰椎间盘突出症患者椎间盘切除术后MC的重要性,显示腰椎椎间盘切除术后MC的发病率较高,特别是从术前缺乏MC到MC1或MC2。术前MC0型比MC1或MC2型组合更容易发生术后MC转化。这些发现对于提高手术效果和术后护理至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Modic changes (MCs) are identified as an independent risk factor for low back pain. Different subtypes of MCs vary in their impact on postoperative pain relief. However, consensus on the transformation of postoperative MC fractions in patients with distinct MC subtypes is lacking.
    UNASSIGNED: This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis searched English-language articles in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases until January 2024. Studies included focused on patients transitioning between various microcrack subtypes post-discectomy. The primary outcome measure was the transformation between different postoperative microcrack fractions.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight studies with 689 participants were analyzed. Overall, there is moderate to high-quality evidence indicating differences in the incidence of MC conversion across MC subtypes. The overall incidence of MC conversion was 27.7%, with rates of 37.0%, 20.5%, and 19.1% for MC0, MC1, and MC2 subtypes, respectively. Thus, postoperative MC type transformation, particularly from preoperative MC0 to MC1 (17.7%) or MC2 (13.1%), was more common, with MC1 transformation being predominant. Patients with preoperative comorbid MC1 types (19.0%) exhibited more postoperative transitions than those with MC2 types (12.4%).
    UNASSIGNED: This study underscores the significance of analyzing post-discectomy MCs in patients with lumbar disc herniation, revealing a higher incidence of MCs post-lumbar discectomy, particularly from preoperative absence of MC to MC1 or MC2. Preoperative MC0 types were more likely to undergo postoperative MC transformation than combined MC1 or MC2 types. These findings are crucial for enhancing surgical outcomes and postoperative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈椎病(CS),包括脊髓病和神经根病,是最常见的退行性颈椎疾病。本研究旨在评估与常规颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)相比,单侧双门静脉内窥镜(UBE)治疗单侧颈神经根病或单侧颈椎间盘突出症引起的并发颈脊髓病的临床疗效。
    方法:前瞻性,随机化,控制,进行了非劣效性试验.样本包括131例患者,他们在2021年9月至2022年9月期间接受了UBE或ACDF。将具有颈神经根或共存脊髓压迫症状和影像学定义的单侧颈神经根病或单侧颈椎间盘突出症引起的并发颈脊髓病的患者随机分为两组:UBE组(n=63)和ACDF组(n=68)。手术时间,失血,手术后住院时间,记录围手术期并发症。术前和术后改良日本骨科协会(mJOA)量表评分,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分,mJOA的恢复率(RR)用于评估临床结局。
    结果:接受UBE治疗的患者术后住院时间明显短于接受ACDF治疗的患者(p<0.05)。颈部或手臂VAS评分无显著差异,NDI得分,MJOA得分,或两组间mJOA的平均RR(p<0.05)。两组仅观察到轻度并发症,无显著性差异(p=0.30)。
    结论:UBE可显著缓解疼痛和残疾,无严重并发症,大多数患者对这种技术感到满意。因此,该手术可安全有效地替代ACDF用于治疗单侧颈神经根病或单侧颈椎间盘突出症引起的并发颈脊髓病.
    背景:这项研究于2023年2月08日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(http://www.chictr.org.cn,#ChiCTR2300074273)。
    BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylosis (CS), including myelopathy and radiculopathy, is the most common degenerative cervical spine disease. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) compared to those of conventional anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for treating unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy induced by unilateral cervical herniated discs.
    METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial was conducted. The sample consisted of 131 patients who underwent UBE or ACDF was conducted between September 2021 and September 2022. Patients with cervical nerve roots or coexisting spinal cord compression symptoms and imaging-defined unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy induced by unilateral cervical herniated discs were randomized into two groups: a UBE group (n = 63) and an ACDF group (n = 68). The operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay after surgery, and perioperative complications were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, neck disability index (NDI) scores, and recovery rate (RR) of the mJOA were utilized to evaluate clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: The hospital stay after surgery was significantly shorter in patients treated with UBE than in those treated with ACDF (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the neck or arm VAS score, NDI score, mJOA score, or mean RR of the mJOA between the two groups (p < 0.05). Only mild complications were observed in both groups, with no significant difference (p = 0.30).
    CONCLUSIONS: UBE can significantly relieve pain and disability without severe complications, and most patients are satisfied with this technique. Consequently, this procedure can be used safely and effectively as an alternative to ACDF for treating unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy induced by unilateral cervical herniated discs.
    BACKGROUND: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 02/08/2023 ( http://www.chictr.org.cn , #ChiCTR2300074273).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    椎间盘突出症(IVDH)是犬常见的脊柱疾病,显著影响他们的健康,移动性,和整体福祉。这项研究开始努力在兽医MRI扫描中自动检测和定位IVDH病变,利用先进的人工智能(AI)方法。一个全面的犬IVDH数据集,包括来自213只不同品种的宠物狗的T2加权矢状MRI图像,年龄,和尺寸,编译并用于训练和测试IVDH检测模型。实验结果表明,传统的两阶段检测模型可靠地优于一阶段检测模型,包括最近的你只看一次X(YOLOX)探测器。在方法论方面,这项研究引入了一种新颖的脊柱定位模块,成功集成到不同的对象检测模型中,以增强IVDH检测,达到平均精度(AP)高达75.32%。此外,研究了迁移学习以适应较小的猫科动物数据集的IVDH检测模型。总的来说,这项研究为推进兽医护理人工智能提供了见解,确定挑战并探索兽医放射学未来发展的潜在策略。
    Intervertebral Disc Herniation (IVDH) is a common spinal disease in dogs, significantly impacting their health, mobility, and overall well-being. This study initiates an effort to automate the detection and localization of IVDH lesions in veterinary MRI scans, utilizing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) methods. A comprehensive canine IVDH dataset, comprising T2-weighted sagittal MRI images from 213 pet dogs of various breeds, ages, and sizes, was compiled and utilized to train and test the IVDH detection models. The experimental results showed that traditional two-stage detection models reliably outperformed one-stage models, including the recent You Only Look Once X (YOLOX) detector. In terms of methodology, this study introduced a novel spinal localization module, successfully integrated into different object detection models to enhance IVDH detection, achieving an average precision (AP) of up to 75.32%. Additionally, transfer learning was explored to adapt the IVDH detection model for a smaller feline dataset. Overall, this study provides insights into advancing AI for veterinary care, identifying challenges and exploring potential strategies for future development in veterinary radiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的发病率呈逐年上升趋势,影响年轻年龄组的新兴趋势。本研究旨在探讨二仙汤联合耳穴贴压治疗LDH的临床疗效。我们的目标是提供证据支持在临床环境中纳入中医(TCM)康复技术。
    方法:这项随机对照试验纳入了102名诊断为LDH的患者,并将他们分为对照组和干预组。对照组进行为期2周的康复治疗,干预组在对照组的基础上接受二仙汤和耳穴贴压治疗。主要结局指标包括3个量表-视觉模拟量表(VAS),日本骨科协会(JOA),和Oswestry残疾指数-以及3种炎症标志物:C反应蛋白(CRP),白细胞介素-6(IL-6),和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)。此外,评估压力痛阈值和疼痛耐受阈值.参与者在基线时进行评估,在14天,治疗后28天。
    结果:治疗2周后,对照组和干预组均表现出VAS的显着改善,JOA,ODI,CRP,IL-6,TNF-α,压力痛阈值,和疼痛耐受阈值(P<0.05)。这些改善在VAS的28天中持续存在,JOA,和ODI得分(P<0.05)。在14天,在VAS方面,干预组显示出明显优于对照组的结果,JOA,ODI,CRP,TNF-α,和压力痛阈值(P<0.05)。
    结论:与常规康复治疗相比,二仙汤联合耳穴贴压治疗在缓解LDH患者症状方面具有明显的益处。这种方法提供了新的观点,并为未来LDH的治疗策略提供了证据。
    OBJECTIVE: The incidence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is on the rise annually, with an emerging trend of affecting younger age groups. This study aims to investigate the clinical effectiveness of combining Erxian decoction with auricular acupoint pressure therapy in treating LDH. Our objective is to furnish evidence supporting the incorporation of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) rehabilitation techniques in clinical settings.
    METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 102 patients diagnosed with LDH and allocated them into Control and Intervention groups. The Control group underwent a 2-week rehabilitation regimen, whereas the Intervention group received an augmented treatment comprising Erxian decoction along with auricular acupoint pressure therapy based on the Control group. Main outcome measures included 3 scales - visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and Oswestry Disability Index - as well as 3 inflammatory markers: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Additionally, pressure pain threshold and pain tolerance threshold values were evaluated. Participants were assessed at baseline, on 14-day, and on 28-day posttreatment.
    RESULTS: After 2 weeks of treatment, both the Control and Intervention groups exhibited significant improvements in the VAS, JOA, ODI, CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, pressure pain threshold, and pain tolerance threshold (P < .05). These improvements persisted at the 28-day in the VAS, JOA, and ODI scores (P < .05). On 14-day, the Intervention group showed significantly better outcomes compared to the Control group in terms of the VAS, JOA, ODI, CRP, TNF-α, and pressure pain threshold (P < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional rehabilitation therapy, the combination of Erxian decoction and auricular acupoint pressure therapy demonstrates clear benefits in alleviating symptoms in patients with LDH. This approach offers fresh perspectives and substantiates evidence for future treatment strategies in managing LDH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:目前,目前尚无针对腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的具体类型选择经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)或传统经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)的既定指南.基于密歇根州立大学(MSU)分类系统,这项研究首次对两种手术方法进行了5年以上的中长期随访分析,旨在提供经验证据,以协助在LDH治疗手术前做出更明智的决定。
    方法:这是一项回顾性研究,包括2016年1月1日至2018年12月31日在我院接受PELD或TLIF治疗的273例单水平LDH患者。详细指标包括术前和术后1天的视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),1周,1年,5年随访。并发症,复发,并记录术后5年改良的MacNab标准评分.统计方法包括独立样本t检验,重复测量方差分析(ANOVA),和χ2检验。
    结果:根据MSU分类分为七组,发现在4次术后随访中,VAS和ODI评分均有改善(p<0.001).PELD在减轻疼痛和改善3B分类中的ODI评分方面比TLIF表现出更好的结果,2B,和2C(p<0.05)。TLIF在2A中表现出优于PELD的一致优势,2AB,3A,和3AB分类(p<0.05)。PELD组术后5年内总复发率(11.05%)高于TLIF组(3.96%)。这些主要集中在2A,2AB,3A,和3AB类型。此外,PELD的优良率高于TLIF,但差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.0568,p=0.5895)。
    结论:这项研究表明PELD和TLIF可以缓解LDH,但在不同的MSU分类下具有优势。MSU分类具有特定的指导意义,可以帮助选择PELD或TLIF的手术方式,以实现腰椎间盘突出症患者的最佳治疗效果。
    OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no established guideline on whether to opt for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) or traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery based on specific types of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Based on the Michigan State University (MSU) classification system, this study conducted a medium- to long-term follow-up analysis of two surgical methods over 5 years for the first time, aiming to provide empirical evidence to assist in making more informed decisions before surgery for LDH treatment.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 273 patients with single-level LDH who underwent PELD or TLIF treatment at our hospital between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Detailed metrics included preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at 1-day, 1-week, 1-year, and 5-year follow-ups. Complications, recurrences, and 5-year postoperative modified MacNab criteria scores were also recorded. Statistical methods included independent sample t-tests, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and χ2 tests.
    RESULTS: Classified into seven groups according to the MSU classification, it was found that there was an improvement in the VAS and ODI scores at four postoperative follow-ups (p < 0.001). PELD showed better results than TLIF in reducing pain and improving the ODI scores in the classifications of 3B, 2B, and 2C (p < 0.05). TLIF demonstrated consistent superiority over PELD in 2A, 2AB, 3A, and 3AB classifications (p < 0.05). The total recurrence rate in the PELD group (11.05%) within 5 years after surgery was higher (p < 0.05) than that in the TLIF group (3.96%). These were mainly concentrated in the 2A, 2AB, 3A, and 3AB types. Moreover, the rate of excellent and good outcomes in the PELD was higher than in the TLIF but no significant difference (χ2 = 1.0568, p = 0.5895).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PELD and TLIF may relieve LDH, but have advantages under different MSU classifications. The MSU classification has specific guiding significance and could aid in the surgical selection of PELD or TLIF to achieve optimal treatment outcomes for patients with lumbar disc herniation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者的多节段椎间盘退变(IDD)与术后再突出和下腰痛有关。尽管许多研究人员认为椎旁肌肉变性和IDD之间存在相互依存关系,很少有研究关注LDH患者单水平和多水平IDD的椎旁肌脂肪浸润。本研究旨在探讨LDH患者单水平和多水平IDD之间椎旁肌脂肪浸润的差异。探讨LDH患者脂肪浸润是否是多水平IDD的潜在危险因素。
    方法:本研究对我院2020年1月1日至2020年12月30日收治的82例LDH患者进行回顾性观察分析。27例单级碘缺乏病(A组),55例患者出现多水平IDD(B组)。我们测量了椎旁肌肉的平均计算机断层扫描(CT)密度值,包括多裂(MF),从L1到S1,每个椎间盘的竖脊肌(ES)和腰大肌(PM)。设置亚组,进一步分析不同性别和BMI组的椎旁肌脂肪浸润比值比(OR)。我们测量了矢状角,并分析了这些角度与IDD之间的关系。最后,我们使用逻辑回归,调整了其他混杂因素,探讨脂肪浸润是否是多水平IDD的独立危险因素。
    结果:多水平IDD的平均年龄(51.40±15.47岁)明显高于单水平IDD(33.37±7.10岁)。MF的平均CT密度值,单水平IDD中ES和PM显著高于多水平IDD(均ps<0.001)。两组之间的角度平均值差异无统计学意义。无论是脂肪(体重指数[BMI]>24.0kg/m2)还是正常,MF和ES平均肌肉CT密度值低的患者明显更容易患多级IDD。在纯模型中,MF的平均CT密度值,ES和PM均与多IDD的发生显著相关。然而,在调整了各种混杂因素后,仅MF和ES的平均CT密度值的OR仍然具有统计学意义(OR分别为0.810、0.834)。
    结论:在LDH患者中,与单水平IDD患者相比,多水平IDD患者的MF和ES脂肪浸润更严重。MF和ES的脂肪浸润是LDH患者多水平IDD的独立危险因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Multiple-level Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is related to postoperative re-herniation and low back pain. Although many investigators believed that there is an interdependence between paraspinal muscles degeneration and IDD, few studies focused on the fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles on single- and multiple-level IDD in patients with LDH. This study aims to investigate the difference on the fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles between single- and multiple-levels IDD in patients with LDH. and to explore in patients with LDH whether fatty infiltration is a potential risk factor for multiple-level IDD.
    METHODS: This study was conducted as a retrospective observational analysis of 82 patients with LDH from January 1, 2020 to December 30, 2020 in our hospital were enrolled. Twenty-seven cases had single-level IDD (Group A), and 55 cases had multiple-level IDD (Group B). We measured the mean computed tomography (CT) density value of the paraspinal muscles, including multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES) and psoas muscle (PM) at each disc from L1 to S1. Subgroups were set to further analyze the odds ratio (OR) of fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles in different sex and BMI groups. We measured sagittal angles and analyzed the relationships between these angles and IDD. Finally, we use logistic regression, adjusted for other confounding factors, to investigate whether fatty infiltration is an independent risk factor for multi-level IDD.
    RESULTS: The average age in multi-level IDD (51.40 ± 15.47 years) was significantly higher than single-level IDD (33.37 ± 7.10 years). The mean CT density value of MF, ES and PM in single-level IDD was significantly higher than multi-level IDD (all ps < 0.001). There was no significant difference of the mean value of angles between the two groups. No matter being fat (body mass index [BMI] > 24.0 kg/m2) or normal, patients with low mean muscle CT density value of MF and ES are significantly easier to suffer from multiple-level IDD. In the pure model, the average CT density value of the MF, ES and PM is all significantly associated with the occurrence of multi-IDD. However, after adjusting for various confounding factors, only the OR of the average CT density value for MF and ES remains statistically significant (OR = 0.810, 0.834, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LDH, patients with multiple-level IDD have more severe fatty infiltration of MF and ES than those with single-level IDD. Fatty infiltration of MF and ES are independent risk factors for multiple-level IDD in LDH patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经皮内镜经椎间孔髓核摘除术(PELD)是治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的一种新型微创脊柱手术。根据3年的随访数据,通过回顾性队列研究分析PELD对LDH患者临床结局的影响,从而为临床选择手术方案提供指导。
    方法:回顾性分析我院2019年1月至2020年10月收治的150例LDH患者的临床资料。根据病历系统中记录的手术方法,将患者分为开放腰椎显微椎间盘切除术(OLM)组(n=50)和PELD组(n=100)。匹配后比较两组患者的手术及术后恢复指标。这些包括切口长度,术中失血,操作时间,术后下床时间和住院时间,回收率,短期并发症发生率,腰椎视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)得分。
    结果:与OLM组相比,PELD组切口长度较短,更短的操作时间,术后下床时间短,缩短住院时间,术中失血少,短期并发症发生率较低,3个月时腰部疼痛和功能障碍评分,6个月,手术后1年,较高的短期良好回收率,术后3年生活质量评分较高(p<0.05)。
    结论:与OLM相比,PELD治疗LDH患者可减少手术时间,失血,以及住院时间,提示术后短期恢复效果。与OLM相比,PELD还可以降低短期并发症的发生率,增强疼痛控制效果和改善中期功能障碍,并提高长期生活质量。
    OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PELD) is a new minimally invasive spine surgery for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Based on the 3-year follow-up data, the effect of PELD on the clinical outcomes of patients with LDH through a retrospective cohort study was analyzed in this article, so as to provide guidance for clinical selection of surgical options.
    METHODS: The clinical data of 150 patients with LDH admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical methods recorded in the medical record system, the patients were divided into the open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM) group (n = 50) and the PELD group (n = 100). The surgical and postoperative recovery indicators of the two groups were compared after matching. These included incision length, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative ambulation time and hospital stays, recovery rate, short-term complication rate, Lumbar visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score.
    RESULTS: Compared with the OLM group, the PELD group had shorter incision length, shorter operation time, shorter postoperative ambulation time, shorter hospital stays, less intraoperative blood loss, lower short-term complication rate, lower lumbar pain and dysfunction scores at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after operation, higher short-term excellent-and-good recovery rate, and higher quality-of-life scores at 3 years after operation (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OLM, PELD in the treatment of LDH patients can reduce the operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stays, suggesting a short-term postoperative recovery effect. Compared with OLM, PELD can also reduce the incidence of short-term complications, enhance the effect of pain control and improvement of dysfunction in the medium term, and improve the long-term quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通过杠杆定位手法(LPM)可以有效改善腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的临床症状,这与大脑的疼痛调节机制密切相关。磁共振成像(MRI)提供了一种客观和视觉的手段来研究大脑如何协调镇痛效果的特征。从多模态MRI的角度来看,应用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和磁共振波谱(MRS)技术,从脑结构方面综合评价LPM对LDH脑区的影响特点,脑功能和脑代谢。这种多模态MRI技术为LPM在LDH中的临床应用提供了生物学基础。
    方法:共60例LDH患者和30例健康对照,与性别相匹配,年龄,和多年的教育,将参加这项研究。使用随机数字表法将LDH患者分为两组(第1组,n=30;第2组,n=30)。第1组将每两天接受一次LPM治疗,在4周内共12次。第2组将在与第1组相同的时期内接受假LPM治疗。所有30名健康对照将被分为第3组。将在三个时间点(TP)对第1组和第2组进行多模态MRI:在LPM之前(TP1),在一个LPM会话(TP2)之后,经过整个疗程的LPM治疗。健康对照(组3)将不经历LPM并且将仅经受单个多模态MRI扫描。第1组和第2组的参与者将被要求完成临床问卷。这些评估将侧重于疼痛强度和功能障碍,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分系统,分别。
    结论:本研究的目的是探讨LDH患者LPM治疗后的多模态脑反应特征,目的是为临床应用提供生物学基础。
    背景:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05613179,标识符:NCT05613179。
    BACKGROUND: The clinical symptoms of Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH) can be effectively ameliorated through Lever Positioning Manipulation (LPM), which is closely linked to the brain\'s pain-regulating mechanisms. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) offers an objective and visual means to study how the brain orchestrates the characteristics of analgesic effects. From the perspective of multimodal MRI, we applied functional MRI (fMRI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectrum (MRS) techniques to comprehensively evaluate the characteristics of the effects of LPM on the brain region of LDH from the aspects of brain structure, brain function and brain metabolism. This multimodal MRI technique provides a biological basis for the clinical application of LPM in LDH.
    METHODS: A total of 60 LDH patients and 30 healthy controls, matched by gender, age, and years of education, will be enrolled in this study. The LDH patients will be divided into two groups (Group 1, n = 30; Group 2, n = 30) using a random number table method. Group 1 will receive LPM treatment once every two days, for a total of 12 times over 4 weeks. Group 2 will receive sham LPM treatment during the same period as Group 1. All 30 healthy controls will be divided into Group 3. Multimodal MRI will be performed on Group 1 and Group 2 at three time points (TPs): before LPM (TP1), after one LPM session (TP2), and after a full course of LPM treatment. The healthy controls (Group 3) will not undergo LPM and will be subject to only a single multimodal MRI scan. Participants in both Group 1 and Group 2 will be required to complete clinical questionnaires. These assessments will focus on pain intensity and functional disorders, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring systems, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of this study is to investigate the multimodal brain response characteristics of LDH patients after treatment with LPM, with the goal of providing a biological basis for clinical applications.
    BACKGROUND: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05613179 , identifier: NCT05613179.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号