Internal jugular vein

颈内静脉
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迅速评估和快速更换血管内液是复苏低血容量患者的关键步骤。通过直接中心静脉压(CVP)测量来评估血管内容积是一种侵入性的,耗时,和劳动密集型程序。如今,床旁超声引导下颈内静脉(IJV)或下腔静脉(IVC)容积评估通常作为直接CVP的替代指标.因此,我们研究了CVP与IJV和IVC的塌陷指数(CI)之间的关联强度,以评估危重患者的容量状态.
    测量了床边USG引导的A-P直径和右侧IJV和IVC的横截面积,并推导了它们相应的坍落度指数。IJV和IVC指数的结果与CVP相关。
    对70名入选患者中的60名进行了分析。患者的基线临床参数如表1所示。对于CSA和AP直径,0°时CVP与IJV-CI的相关性分别为r=-0.107(p=0.001)和r=-0.092(p=0.001).CSA在30°时CVP与IJV-CI的相关性与直径,然而,分别为(r=-0.109,p=0.001)和(r=-0.117,p=0.001),分别。表2描述了CVP和IVC-CIr=-0.503,对于CSA,p=0.001,对于直径,r=-0.452,p=0.001之间的相关性。
    可以使用IVC和IJV塌陷指数代替侵入性CVP监测来评估危重患者的液体状态。
    库马尔A,BhartiAK,HussainM,KumarS,KumarA.重症患者颈内静脉和下腔静脉塌陷指数与直接中心静脉压测量的相关性:一项观察性研究。印度J暴击护理中心2024;28(6):595-600。
    UNASSIGNED: Prompt assessments and quick replacement of intravascular fluid are critical steps to resuscitate hypovolemic patients. Intravascular volume assessment by direct central venous pressure (CVP) measurement is an invasive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive procedure. Nowadays, bedside ultrasound-guided volume assessment of the internal jugular vein (IJV) or inferior vena cava (IVC) is commonly employed as a proxy for direct CVP.Therefore, we examined the strength of association between CVP and collapsibility index (CI) of the IJV and IVC for evaluating the volume status of critically ill patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Bedside USG-guided A-P diameter and cross-sectional area of the right IJV and IVC were measured, and their corresponding collapsibility indices were deduced. The results of the IJV and IVC indices were correlated with CVP.
    UNASSIGNED: About 60 out of 70 enrolled patients were analyzed. The baseline clinical parameters of patients are shown in Table 1. For CSA and AP diameter, the correlations between CVP and IJV-CI at 0° were r = -0.107 (p = 0.001) and r = -0.092 (p = 0.001). Correlations between CVP and IJV-CI at 30° for CSA and diameter, however, were (r = -0.109, p = 0.001) and (r = -0.117, p = 0.001), respectively. Table 2 depicts the correlation between CVP and IVC-CI r = -0.503, p = 0.001 for CSA and r = -0.452, p = 0.001 for diameter.
    UNASSIGNED: The IVC and IJV collapsibility indices can be used in place of invasive CVP monitoring to assess fluid status in critically ill patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Kumar A, Bharti AK, Hussain M, Kumar S, Kumar A. Correlation of Internal Jugular Vein and Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index with Direct Central Venous Pressure Measurement in Critically-ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(6):595-600.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)是一种罕见的常染色体显性遗传病,具有广泛的临床表现。NF1血管病变占发现的0.4%至6.4%,它们通常在动脉循环中发展,而静脉受累很少。我们介绍了一例73岁的NF1男性,偶然发现右颈部肿胀2个月。进行了不同的放射学模式,确定病变为颈内动脉瘤。患者因肿胀而无症状,因此接受了保守治疗。NF1静脉血管病变很少见,但鉴于动脉瘤壁的脆性和神经纤维瘤渗入血管,它们具有有害的后果,例如破裂和严重出血。因此,临床高度怀疑和选择性的影像学检查和随访对医师来说是明智的.
    Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder that has a wide array of clinical manifestations. NF1 Vasculopathies constitute 0.4% to 6.4% of the findings and they often develop in the arterial circulation while venous involvement is rare. We present a case of a 73-year-old male with NF1 with an incidental finding of right neck swelling for 2 months. Different radiological modalities were performed, identifying the lesion as an internal jugular vein aneurysm. The patient was managed conservatively as he was asymptomatic in relation to the swelling. NF1 venous vasculopathies are rare but they have detrimental consequences such as rupture and severe hemorrhage in view of the fragility of the aneurysmal wall and the infiltration of the neurofibroma into the vessel. Hence, high clinical suspicion and selective imaging and follow-up is advisable for physicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    中心静脉压(CVP)是右心房压力的直接近似值,并且受诸如总血容量等因素的影响。静脉顺应性,心输出量,和矫正。正常CVP在8-12mmHg范围内,但随容量状态和静脉顺应性而变化。对于患有循环性休克或液体紊乱的患者,监测和管理CVP的紊乱至关重要。CVP升高会导致间隙中的液体积聚,损害静脉回流和减少心脏预负荷。虽然肺动脉导管插入术和中心静脉导管获得的测量被认为更准确,他们有并发症的风险,他们的使用没有显示出临床改善。基于超声的颈内静脉评估(IJV)提供实时,用于估计CVP的静态和动态参数的非侵入性测量。IJV参数,包括直径和比率,与CVP具有良好的相关性。尽管在非侵入性CVP测量方面取得了重大进展,还没有找到可靠的工具。目前的方法可以为评估CVP提供合理的指导,只要他们的局限性得到承认。
    Central venous pressure (CVP) serves as a direct approximation of right atrial pressure and is influenced by factors like total blood volume, venous compliance, cardiac output, and orthostasis. Normal CVP falls within 8-12 mmHg but varies with volume status and venous compliance. Monitoring and managing disturbances in CVP are vital in patients with circulatory shock or fluid disturbances. Elevated CVP can lead to fluid accumulation in the interstitial space, impairing venous return and reducing cardiac preload. While pulmonary artery catheterization and central venous catheter obtained measurements are considered to be more accurate, they carry risk of complications and their usage has not shown clinical improvement. Ultrasound-based assessment of the internal jugular vein (IJV) offers real-time, non-invasive measurement of static and dynamic parameters for estimating CVP. IJV parameters, including diameter and ratio, has demonstrated good correlation with CVP. Despite significant advancements in non-invasive CVP measurement, a reliable tool is yet to be found. Present methods can offer reasonable guidance in assessing CVP, provided their limitations are acknowledged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    本文报告一例症状有限的患者颈内静脉畸形(IJVM)和治疗途径。经过历史和影像学研究,我们决定手术切除以排除可能的恶性肿瘤和未来的血栓形成等问题.肿块被切除了,部分IJVM被结扎。肿块没有可识别的恶性肿瘤,患者完全康复,无并发症。本文强调了识别静脉畸形的重要性,并强调了行动过程背后的原因。
    This paper reports a case of an internal jugular venous malformation (IJVM) and route of treatment in a patient with limited symptoms. After history and imaging studies, a determination of surgical excision was made to rule out possible malignancy and future problems such as thrombosis. The mass was resected, and part of the IJVM was ligated. The mass had no identifiable malignancy, and the patient recovered fully with no complications. The paper highlights the importance of identifying venous malformations and highlights the reasoning behind the course of action.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们分析了放化疗程序,以评估感染发病率和引起感染的因素。这项单中心回顾性研究包括2017年1月至2020年12月期间的1690例Chemoport植入病例。总的来说,在1582名患者中插入了化学端口。化疗的平均使用时间为481天(范围为1-1794,中位数为309天)。感染80例(4.7%),每1000个导管天0.098。在80例因疑似感染而移除趋化因子的病例中,细菌被鉴定为48(60%)。在感染组中,左颈内静脉穿刺的病例明显增多(15[18.8%]vs.147[9.1%];p=0.004)。肺栓塞在感染组之间有显着差异(3[3.8%]vs.19(1.2%),p=0.048)。左颈内静脉的风险比为2.259(95%置信区间[CI]1.288-3.962),3.393(95%CI1.069-10.765)用于肺栓塞,慢性阻塞性肺疾病为0.488(95%CI0.244-0.977)。使用右颈内静脉而不是左颈内静脉时进行化疗插入可能会减少随后的感染。
    We analyzed chemoport insertion procedures to evaluate infectious morbidity and factors causing infection. This single-center retrospective study included 1690 cases of chemoport implantation between January 2017 and December 2020. Overall, chemoports were inserted in 1582 patients. The average duration of chemoport use was 481 days (range 1-1794, median 309). Infections occurred in 80 cases (4.7%), with 0.098 per 1000 catheter-days. Among the 80 cases in which chemoports were removed because of suspected infection, bacteria were identified in 48 (60%). Significantly more cases of left internal jugular vein punctures were noted in the infected group (15 [18.8%] vs. 147 [9.1%]; p = 0.004). Pulmonary embolism was significantly different between the infection groups (3 [3.8%] vs. 19 (1.2%), p = 0.048). The hazard ratio was 2.259 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.288-3.962) for the left internal jugular vein, 3.393 (95% CI 1.069-10.765) for pulmonary embolism, and 0.488 (95% CI 0.244-0.977) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Using the right internal jugular vein rather than the left internal jugular vein when performing chemoport insertion might reduce subsequent infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    脊髓副神经的保留是选择性颈清扫术中头颈部肿瘤外科手术的关键目标。本研究旨在说明XI颅神经的解剖变异,研究脊神经与颈内静脉的关系,以及手术的影响。描述了2例接受颈淋巴结清扫术的肿瘤手术患者。两种情况下都发现脊髓副神经穿过颈内静脉开窗。除了这个案例系列,使用Medline和PubMed数据库进行独立文献综述.在大多数情况下(67%-96%),脊髓副神经向颈内静脉的外侧延伸。不那么频繁,XI颅神经向颈内静脉内侧延伸。很少,如这个案例系列所述,神经穿过静脉开窗(0.48%-3.3%)。
    The preservation of the spinal accessory nerve represents a key goal in head and neck oncologic surgery during selective neck dissection. This study aims to illustrate the anatomical variants of the XI cranial nerve, delving into the relationship between the spinal nerve and the internal jugular vein, as well as the surgical implications. Two cases of patients who underwent oncologic surgery with neck dissection are described. Both cases found the spinal accessory nerve passing through the fenestration of the internal jugular vein. Alongside this case series, an independent literature review was conducted using the Medline and PubMed databases. In the majority of cases (67% - 96%), the spinal accessory nerve traces a lateral course to the internal jugular vein. Less frequently, the XI cranial nerve courses medial to the internal jugular vein. More rarely, as described in this case series, the nerve crosses through the fenestration of the vein (0.48% - 3.3%).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    通常,颈外静脉(EJV)位于胸锁乳突肌的表面上,并连接锁骨下静脉或静脉角。颈内静脉(IJV)与颈总动脉和迷走神经密切相关,被颈动脉鞘包围.通常,这些船只之间没有直接联系。在例行的颈部解剖中,我们发现IJV和EJV之间罕见的吻合。吻合位于环状软骨的水平上。它大约有1厘米长,腔的直径为0.3厘米。沿着血管的长度没有阻塞。方向倾斜,并跟随从IJV到EJV的血流。观察到的变异具有与在颈部区域执行的许多程序相关的高临床重要性。如肾衰竭患者血液透析导管的放置,在危重病人的护理中插入中心静脉管线,和根治性颈淋巴结清扫术。
    Usually, the external jugular vein (EJV) is located superficially over the sternocleidomastoid muscle and joins the subclavian vein or the venous angle. The internal jugular vein (IJV) lies deeply in close relation with the common carotid artery and vagus nerve, enveloped by the carotid sheath. Normally, there is no direct connection between those vessels. During a routine neck dissection, we found a rare anastomosis between IJV and EJV. The anastomosis was localized on the level of the cricoid cartilage. It was approximately 1 cm long, with the diameter of the lumen being 0.3 cm. There was no obstruction along the length of the vessel. The direction was oblique and followed the blood flow from IJV to EJV. The observed variation has high clinical importance related to numerous procedures executed in the neck region, such as placement of hemodialysis catheter in patients with renal failure, insertion of central venous line in the care of critically ill patients, and radical neck dissections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颈内静脉(IJV)的护理点超声(POCUS)提供了一种估计右心房压力(RAP)的非侵入性手段,尤其是在由于肝病或腹部手术等原因导致下腔静脉无法进入或不可靠的情况下。虽然许多临床医生熟悉通过颈内静脉视觉评估颈静脉压,这种方法缺乏灵敏度。POCUS的利用显着增强了静脉的可视化,导致更准确的识别。已经证明,将IJVPOCUS与体格检查相结合可以增强RAP评估的特异性。这篇综述旨在提供可用于从颈内静脉估计RAP的各种超声技术的全面总结,利用现有数据。
    Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the internal jugular vein (IJV) offers a non-invasive means of estimating right atrial pressure (RAP), especially in cases where the inferior vena cava is inaccessible or unreliable due to conditions such as liver disease or abdominal surgery. While many clinicians are familiar with visually assessing jugular venous pressure through the internal jugular vein, this method lacks sensitivity. The utilization of POCUS significantly enhances the visualization of the vein, leading to a more accurate identification. It has been demonstrated that combining IJV POCUS with physical examination enhances the specificity of RAP estimation. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the various sonographic techniques available for estimating RAP from the internal jugular vein, drawing upon existing data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心室分流术是治疗脑积水最常用的技术之一。脑室-腹腔分流术(VPS)是最常用的手术,心室心房分流术(VAS)是大多数医疗中心的第二选择。这项研究的主要目的是介绍和描述VAS的手术方法,概述我们的经验,并将其与传统的分流技术进行比较。
    方法:在这项回顾性队列比较研究中,我们纳入了2010年1月至2021年2月在单一学术机构接受手术治疗的脑积水患者.我们将手术分为两组:VPS患者和常规VAS患者一起分为常规技术(CT)组,第二组是我们在颈内静脉完全闭塞(IJVOT)的情况下进行VAS的患者.我们比较了手术时间,术后并发症,通过使用Fisher精确检验进行单变量分析,以及各组间分流失败的发生。
    结果:在分析的106名患者中,在66名患者中进行了IJVOT,40例患者的CT。IJVOT的中位手术时间为60分钟(IQR60-90),而CT的中位手术时间为100分钟(IQR60-120)(p<0.01)。在手术后一个月的随访中,83.3%的IJVOT患者和62.5%的CT患者不需要分流切除或分流翻修(p<0.01)。手术后1个月和6个月,CT的分流翻修率为12.5%和1.5%,而IJVOT的分流翻修率为1.5%和2.5%。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,采用IJVOT进行VAS是一种安全的方法,其手术时间短,结果与CT相当。然而,由于本研究代表了第一个评估IJVOT的队列,必须进行更大的前瞻性研究,随着临床试验,为了充分探索和建立功效,长期结果,并对调车技术进行了深入的比较。
    BACKGROUND: Ventricular shunts are one of the most frequent techniques used for the management of hydrocephalus. The ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is the most commonly performed procedure, and the ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) is the second option in most medical centers. The main objective of this study is to introduce and describe a surgical approach for VAS outlining our experience and comparing it with traditional shunting techniques.
    METHODS: In this retrospective cohort comparison study, we included patients with hydrocephalus treated with a surgical procedure between January 2010 and February 2021 at a single academic institution. We categorized the procedures into two groups: patients with VPS and conventional VAS grouped together into the conventional technique (CT) group, and the second group was patients with whom we performed VAS with complete internal jugular vein occlusion (IJVOT). We compared the surgical time, postoperative complications, and occurrence of shunt failure among the groups by performing univariate analysis using the Fisher exact test.
    RESULTS: Out of the 106 patients included in the analysis, IJVOT was performed in 66 patients, and CT in 40 patients. The median surgical time was 60 min (IQR 60-90) for IJVOT versus 100 min (IQR 60-120) for CT (p < 0.01). In the follow-up a month after the procedure, 83.3% of patients with IJVOT and 62.5% of patients with CT did not require shunt removal or shunt revision (p < 0.01). Shunt revision rates were 12.5% and 1.5% for CT while 1.5% and 2.5% for IJVOT at 1 and 6 months after the procedure.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that VAS with IJVOT is a safe method that exhibited shorter surgical times and outcomes comparable to CT. However, since the present study represents the first cohort evaluating IJVOT, it is imperative to conduct larger prospective studies, along with clinical trials, to fully explore and establish efficacy, long-term outcomes, and an in-depth comparison among shunting techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超声(US)引导的血管插管有两种方法:短轴(SA)方法和长轴(LA)方法。然而,哪种方法更好还有待观察。因此,我们进行了本系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估US引导下SA和LA技术之间的血管插管术的有效性和安全性.
    我们在PubMed中进行了全面的电子数据库搜索,Embase,Cochrane图书馆和WebofScience从开始到2022年6月进行相关研究。在这项更新的荟萃分析中纳入了比较SA方法和LA方法用于US引导的血管通路的随机对照试验。首次尝试成功率是主要结果。次要结果是总体成功率,插管时间,尝试次数和并发症的发生率。使用RevMan软件(5.4版;北欧Cochrane中心,科克伦合作组织,哥本哈根,丹麦)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估每个研究的潜在偏倚风险。
    总共,由1885名参与者组成的16项研究纳入了这项更新的荟萃分析。SA和LA血管通路技术的首过成功率无统计学差异(风险比=1.07,95%置信区间:0.94-1.22)。整体插管成功率,并发症发生率,SA组和LA组的平均置管时间和平均尝试次数无显著差异.
    这项更新的荟萃分析表明,美国引导的血管插管的SA和LA方法在首过成功方面相似,总体插管成功率,总并发症发生率,插管时间和尝试次数。
    UNASSIGNED: There are two approaches for ultrasound (US)-guided vessel cannulation: the short axis (SA) approach and the long axis (LA) approach. However, it remains to be seen which approach is better. Therefore, we performed the present updated systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of US-guided vascular cannulation between the SA and LA techniques.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a comprehensive electronic database search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for the relevant studies from inception to June 2022. Randomised controlled trials comparing the SA approach and the LA approach for US-guided vascular access were incorporated in this updated meta-analysis. The first-attempt success rate was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were the overall success rate, cannulation time, number of attempts and the incidence of complications. The statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan software (version 5.4; the Nordic Cochrane Centre, the Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate each study\'s potential risk for bias.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 16 studies consisting of 1885 participants were incorporated in this updated meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference was found between the SA and LA vascular access techniques for first-pass success rate (risk ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-1.22). The overall cannulation success rate, complication rate, average cannulation time and average number of attempts were not significantly different between the SA and LA groups.
    UNASSIGNED: This updated meta-analysis demonstrated that the SA and LA approaches of US-guided vessel cannulation are similar regarding first-pass success, overall cannulation success rate, total complication rate, cannulation time and the number of attempts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号