这篇文章是关于“开放性”的系列文章的一部分,\"\"非线性,“和”体现健康“在后物理中,信息(虚拟)社会时代。这是至关重要的,因为人工智能的进步带来的威胁需要一个整体,体现的方法。通常,健康分为不同的类别,例如,(心理)心理健康,生物/身体健康,遗传健康,环境卫生,或生殖健康。然而,这种分离只会破坏健康;不能将健康分成亚组(心身,例如)。体现的健康不包含虚假的分裂,并依赖于“乐观”作为关键框架值。乐观只能通过开放的机制/有利条件来实现。开放对于确保个人和社会的具体健康至关重要。乐观主义要求人们成为自己生活中的积极参与者,而不仅仅是空白的石板,以物理决定论的颜色绘制(因此摆脱了虚无主义-这是自由/自治/质量的毁灭)。建立一个具体的健康账户,分析了以下主题/目标,已建成,并得到验证:(1)对德国唯心主义(许多法律伦理体系的症结)和弗洛伊德的现代重新解释和验证;(2)确定开放的有限理性和概念语义(这是热力学的基础,心理社会关系,个人自主,伦理,并且作为许多监管系统的中央宪法政府价值);(3)开放性与社会/个人体现的健康之间的联系,自由,和自主性;(4)确保个人主义/主观性在构成开放性中的作用;(5)非线性动力学在确保乐观和体现健康方面的重要作用;(6)通过从(i)信息和计算机科学中汲取证据,使用不变性的方法论科学价值(概括价值)来验证论点,(二)量子理论,和(iii)生物遗传进化证据;(7)验证和促进理论哲学在构成具体健康方面的不可剥夺的作用,以及现代社会如何贬低体现健康,通过误解和破坏理论。因此,本文通过创建心理-物理-生物-计算-哲学结构,提供并捍卫了对具体健康的最新非物理描述。因此,本文还为经验科学关于技术性的法律和伦理辩论带来了宝贵的连贯性,证明每个领域都在说同样的事情。
This article forms part of a series on \"openness,\" \"non-linearity,\" and \"embodied-health\" in the post-physical, informational (virtual) era of society. This is vital given that the threats posed by advances in artificial intelligence call for a holistic, embodied approach. Typically, health is separated into different categories, for example, (psycho)mental health, biological/bodily health, genetic health, environmental health, or reproductive health. However, this separation only serves to undermine health; there can be no separation of health into subgroups (psychosomatics, for example). Embodied health contains no false divisions and relies on \"optimism\" as the key framing value. Optimism is only achieved through the mechanism/enabling condition of openness. Openness is vital to secure the embodied health for individuals and societies. Optimism demands that persons become active participants within their own lives and are not mere blank slates, painted in the colors of physical determinism (thus a move away from nihilism-which is the annihilation of freedom/autonomy/quality). To build an account of embodied health, the following themes/aims are analyzed, built, and validated: (1) a modern re-interpretation and validation of German idealism (the crux of many legal-ethical systems) and Freud; (2) ascertaining the bounded rationality and conceptual semantics of openness (which underlies thermodynamics, psychosocial relations, individual autonomy, ethics, and as being a central constitutional governmental value for many regulatory systems); (3) the link between openness and societal/individual embodied health, freedom, and autonomy; (4) securing the role of individualism/subjectivity in constituting openness; (5) the vital role of nonlinear dynamics in securing optimism and embodied health; (6) validation of arguments using the methodological scientific value of invariance (generalization value) by drawing evidence from (i)
information and computer sciences, (ii) quantum theory, and (iii) bio-genetic evolutionary evidence; and (7) a validation and promotion of the inalienable role of theoretic philosophy in constituting embodied health, and how modern society denigrates embodied health, by misconstruing and undermining theoretics. Thus, this paper provides and defends an up-to-date non-physical account of embodied health by creating a psycho-physical-biological-computational-philosophical construction. Thus, this paper also brings invaluable coherence to legal and ethical debates on points of technicality from the empirical sciences, demonstrating that each field is saying the same thing.