Indices

指数
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    犬淋巴瘤是狗中最常见的造血系统癌症。许多研究已经评估了血液学异常和比率在患有淋巴瘤的人和狗中的预后价值。
    比较受淋巴瘤影响的狗群体与健康狗之间的血液学参数和全血细胞计数比率,以确定淋巴瘤的潜在预后标志物。
    这项回顾性病例对照研究比较了受多中心大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)影响的114只狗和60只健康狗之间的血液学参数和全血细胞计数比。
    该研究发现LBCL犬和健康犬的血液学指标之间存在一些统计学上的显着差异,但是这些参数与接受麦迪逊威斯康星化疗方案治疗的78只狗的生存时间之间没有相关性。此外,血液学改变进行评估,如贫血,白细胞增多,和血小板减少症.
    血液学比值已被认为是犬LBCL的潜在预后标志物,但其真正的预后价值仍存在争议,需要进一步研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Canine lymphoma is the most common hematopoietic cancer in dogs. Numerous studies have evaluated the prognostic value of hematological abnormalities and ratios in both humans and dogs with lymphoma.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare hematological parameters and complete blood count ratios between a population of dogs affected by lymphoma and healthy dogs to identify potential prognostic markers for lymphoma.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective case-control study compares hematological parameters and complete blood count ratios between a population of 114 dogs affected by multicentric large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and 60 healthy dogs.
    UNASSIGNED: The study found several statistically significant differences between the hematological indices of LBCL dogs and healthy dogs, but no correlation between these parameters and the survival times of 78 dogs treated with chemotherapy Madison Wisconsin protocol. In addition, hematological alterations were evaluated such as anemia, leukocytosis, and thrombocytopenia.
    UNASSIGNED: Hematological ratios have been suggested as potential prognostic markers for canine LBCL but their real prognostic value remains controversial and requires future investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基础数据分析有助于评估关键问题,以辨别基本事实并引出以前看不见的证据。在这篇文章中,我们提供了在COVID-19大流行期间在癌症发病率中观察到的一个微妙现象。我们分析了美国癌症协会的癌症发病率数据[1]。我们将数据分为三组:前COVID-19年(2017年、2018年),在COVID-19年(2019年、2020年、2021年),以及后COVID-19年(2022年、2023年)。以一种新颖的方式,我们应用主成分分析(PCA),计算癌症发病率向量之间的角度,然后在我们的分析中加入对数正态概率概念。我们的分析结果表明,癌症发病率在每个时代都发生了变化(前,during,andpost),癌症发病率在2020年发生了有意义的变化,这是COVID-19时代的高峰。我们定义,计算,并解释了癌症类型在未来一年中在乳腺癌中发生1000例的超额概率,子宫颈,结直肠,子宫体,白血病,肺和支气管,黑色素瘤,霍奇金淋巴瘤,前列腺,和泌尿系癌症。我们还定义了,估计,并从乳腺癌的有利位置说明了其他癌症诊断的指标,during,和后COVID-19时代。COVID-19后的角度向量比大流行前少72%,比大流行期间少28%。癌症媒介的运动在这些时代之间是动态的,和运动因癌症类型而异。宫颈癌趋势图显示2019年和2021年的统计异常。根据我们的发现,指出了今后的研究方向。
    Fundamental data analysis assists in the evaluation of critical questions to discern essential facts and elicit formerly invisible evidence. In this article, we provide clarity into a subtle phenomenon observed in cancer incidences throughout the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed the cancer incidence data from the American Cancer Society [1]. We partitioned the data into three groups: the pre-COVID-19 years (2017, 2018), during the COVID-19 years (2019, 2020, 2021), and the post-COVID-19 years (2022, 2023). In a novel manner, we applied principal components analysis (PCA), computed the angles between the cancer incidence vectors, and then added lognormal probability concepts in our analysis. Our analytic results revealed that the cancer incidences shifted within each era (pre, during, and post), with a meaningful change in the cancer incidences occurring in 2020, the peak of the COVID-19 era. We defined, computed, and interpreted the exceedance probability for a cancer type to have 1000 incidences in a future year among the breast, cervical, colorectal, uterine corpus, leukemia, lung & bronchus, melanoma, Hodgkin\'s lymphoma, prostate, and urinary cancers. We also defined, estimated, and illustrated indices for other cancer diagnoses from the vantage point of breast cancer in pre, during, and post-COVID-19 eras. The angle vectors post the COVID-19 were 72% less than pre-pandemic and 28% less than during the pandemic. The movement of cancer vectors was dynamic between these eras, and movement greatly differed by type of cancer. A trend chart of cervical cancer showed statistical anomalies in the years 2019 and 2021. Based on our findings, a few future research directions are pointed out.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了识别美国铅暴露风险热点,我们从已发表的密歇根州案例研究中扩展了地理空间统计方法。使用五个铅指数对确定的热点进行评估,根据住房年龄和社会人口统计数据,与9份公共卫生部门报告中确定的高风险地点(45-78%)以及来自密歇根州和俄亥俄州的儿童血铅数据热点(例如,科恩的卡帕得分为0.49-0.63)。将地理空间聚类分析和第80-100百分位数方法应用于铅指数,美国人口普查区域的数量范围从8%(指数的交叉)到41%(指数的组合)。对居住在这些人口普查区中的6岁以下儿童数量的分析显示,各州(例如,伊利诺伊州,密歇根州,新泽西,纽约,俄亥俄州,宾夕法尼亚,马萨诸塞州,加州,德克萨斯州)和潜在铅暴露风险最高的县。结果支持使用可用的铅指数作为替代,以在没有一致的情况下确定位置,全美国的全血铅水平(BLL)数据。用当地知识进行实地调查,额外的BLL数据,和环境数据是必要的,以改善识别和分析铅暴露和BLL热点的干预措施。随着科学的发展,这些筛查结果可以为针对铅行动的“更深入的潜水”分析提供信息。
    To identify U.S. lead exposure risk hotspots, we expanded upon geospatial statistical methods from a published Michigan case study. The evaluation of identified hotspots using five lead indices, based on housing age and sociodemographic data, showed moderate-to-substantial agreement with state-identified higher-risk locations from nine public health department reports (45-78%) and with hotspots of children\'s blood lead data from Michigan and Ohio (e.g., Cohen\'s kappa scores of 0.49-0.63). Applying geospatial cluster analysis and 80th-100th percentile methods to the lead indices, the number of U.S. census tracts ranged from ∼8% (intersection of indices) to ∼41% (combination of indices). Analyses of the number of children <6 years old living in those census tracts revealed the states (e.g., Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, California, Texas) and counties with highest potential lead exposure risk. Results support use of available lead indices as surrogates to identify locations in the absence of consistent, complete blood lead level (BLL) data across the United States. Ground-truthing with local knowledge, additional BLL data, and environmental data is needed to improve identification and analysis of lead exposure and BLL hotspots for interventions. While the science evolves, these screening results can inform \"deeper dive\" analyses for targeting lead actions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在紧急医疗状况的初步诊断期间,其中包括急性传染病,尽快评估患者临床状态的严重程度非常重要。与个体生化或生理指标不同,推导出的指数可以更好地将复杂综合征描述为一组症状,因此迅速采取了一套适当的措施。最近,我们报道了含有丁酰胆碱酯酶(BChE)活性的新型诊断指标,在COVID-19患者中下降。此外,在这些患者中,血管性血友病因子(vWF)的分泌增加,导致微血管床上的血栓形成。这项研究的目的是确定COVID-19患者vWF的浓度和活性,并寻找新的诊断指标。主要目标之一是比较某些个体和新得出的指标的预后值。回顾性地将COVID-19患者分为两组:幸存者(n=77)和死亡(n=24)。根据临床症状和计算机断层扫描(CT)结果,病程以中度为主.入院时采集了第一份血样(第一点),第二个样本(第二点)-入院后4-6天内。随着生化指标的标准光谱,BChE活性(BChEa或BChEb用于乙酰硫代胆碱或丁酰硫代胆碱,分别),丙二醛(MDA),和vWF分析(其抗原水平,AGFW,和它的活动,确定ActWF)并得出新的诊断指标。汇集的敏感性,特异性,和接收器工作曲线下面积(AUC),计算似然比(LR)和赔率比(OR)。死亡组的vWF抗原水平比幸存者组高1.5倍。包括vWF抗原水平的指标优于使用vWF活性的指标。发现指数[Urea]×[AGWF]×1000/(BChEb×[ALB])预测COVID-19死亡率的判别力最好(AUC=0.91[0.83,1.00],p<0.0001;OR=72.0[7.5,689],p=0.0002)。此外,[尿素]×1000/(BChEb×[ALB])是死亡率的良好预测因子(AUC=0.95[0.89,1.00],p<0.0001;OR=31.5[3.4,293],p=0.0024)。[尿素]×[AGWF]×1000/(BChEb×[ALB])指数是COVID-19感染相关死亡率的最佳预测指标,其次是[尿素]×1000/(BChEb×[ALB])。在后续队列中验证后,这两个指数可以推荐给诊断实验室。
    During the initial diagnosis of urgent medical conditions, which include acute infectious diseases, it is important to assess the severity of the patient\'s clinical state as quickly as possible. Unlike individual biochemical or physiological indicators, derived indices make it possible to better characterize a complex syndrome as a set of symptoms, and therefore quickly take a set of adequate measures. Recently, we reported on novel diagnostic indices containing butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activity, which is decreased in COVID-19 patients. Also, in these patients, the secretion of von Willebrand factor (vWF) increases, which leads to thrombosis in the microvascular bed. The objective of this study was the determination of the concentration and activity of vWF in patients with COVID-19, and the search for new diagnostic indices. One of the main objectives was to compare the prognostic values of some individual and newly derived indices. Patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively divided into two groups: survivors (n = 77) and deceased (n = 24). According to clinical symptoms and computed tomography (CT) results, the course of disease was predominantly moderate in severity. The first blood sample (first point) was taken upon admission to the hospital, the second sample (second point)-within 4-6 days after admission. Along with the standard spectrum of biochemical indicators, BChE activity (BChEa or BChEb for acetylthiocholin or butyrylthiocholin, respectively), malondialdehyde (MDA), and vWF analysis (its antigen level, AGFW, and its activity, ActWF) were determined and new diagnostic indices were derived. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), as well as Likelihood ratio (LR) and Odds ratio (OR) were calculated. The level of vWF antigen in the deceased group was 1.5-fold higher than the level in the group of survivors. Indices that include vWF antigen levels are superior to indices using vWF activity. It was found that the index [Urea] × [AGWF] × 1000/(BChEb × [ALB]) had the best discriminatory power to predict COVID-19 mortality (AUC = 0.91 [0.83, 1.00], p < 0.0001; OR = 72.0 [7.5, 689], p = 0.0002). In addition, [Urea] × 1000/(BChEb × [ALB]) was a good predictor of mortality (AUC = 0.95 [0.89, 1.00], p < 0.0001; OR = 31.5 [3.4, 293], p = 0.0024). The index [Urea] × [AGWF] × 1000/(BChEb × [ALB]) was the best predictor of mortality associated with COVID-19 infection, followed by [Urea] × 1000/(BChEb × [ALB]). After validation in a subsequent cohort, these two indices could be recommended for diagnostic laboratories.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    综合指数已被广泛用于对国家的环境绩效进行排名。这种环境指数可用于将复杂的信息作为单一价值传达,并有可能引起政治和媒体对环境问题的认识。然而,构造差,或沟通不良的指数,可能会阻碍识别环境缺陷的努力,现有环境指数之间的排名差异很大。这里,我们对现有环境指数的概念框架和方法选择进行了审查,以增强我们对其准确性和适用性的理解。在本研究中,我们根据现有的全球指数的概念框架(包括指数的目标和指标集)和构建方法的选择(例如,加权和聚合)。我们研究了概念框架和方法的差异如何产生更多的,或更少,对一个国家的环境持乐观态度。我们的结果表明:(1)多维环境指数与与人类健康和福利或政策相关的指标呈正相关;(2)仅环境指数彼此呈正相关或根本不相关;(3)多维指数与仅环境指数彼此呈负相关或根本不相关。这表明所包含的概念框架和指标可能会影响一个国家在不同环境指数中的排名。我们的结果强调,在选择现有环境指数或制定新的环境指数时,重要的是评估概念框架(和相关指标)和方法选择是否适合正在衡量和报告的现象。这一点很重要,因为在环境指数中纳入混杂指标可能会对一个国家的环境质量产生误导。
    Composite indices have been widely used to rank the environmental performance of nations. Such environmental indices can be useful in communicating complex information as a single value and have the potential to generate political and media awareness of environmental issues. However, poorly constructed, or poorly communicated indices, can hinder efforts to identify environmental failings, and there are considerable differences in rank among existing environmental indices. Here, we provide a review of the conceptual frameworks and methodological choices used for existing environmental indices to enhance our understanding of their accuracy and applicability. In the present study, we review existing global indices according to their conceptual framework (objectives of the index and set of indicators included) and methodological choices made in their construction (e.g., weighting and aggregation). We examine how differences in conceptual frameworks and methodology may yield a more, or less, optimistic view of a country\'s environment. Our results indicate that (1) multidimensional environmental indices with indicators related to human health and welfare or policy are positively correlated; (2) environment-only indices are positively correlated with one another or are not correlated at all; (3) multidimensional indices and environment-only indices are negatively correlated with each other or are not correlated at all. This indicates that the conceptual frameworks and indicators included may influence a country\'s rank among different environmental indices. Our results highlight that, when choosing an existing environmental index-or developing a new one-it is important to assess whether the conceptual framework (and associated indicators) and methodological choices are appropriate for the phenomenon being measured and reported on. This is important because the inclusion of confounding indicators in environmental indices may provide a misleading view of the quality of a country\'s environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    准确的癌症预测允许有意识的决策。需要精确的指数,以及预测性生物标志物,有助于癌症预后。我们试图对胃肠道(GI)癌症评估中预后指标和生物标志物的现状进行概述。特别是食道,结肠和直肠。
    我们在2001年9月至2022年2月之间对PubMed数据库中的文章进行了全面审查。只包括用英语写的文章。我们回顾了回顾性分析和前瞻性观察性研究。
    列线图是描述良好的工具,可提供对特定癌症相关事件的估计,如总生存期(OS)。它们还可用于揭示特定的患者相关变量,这可能与癌症生存有关。为了辨别优越性,已经对某些预后指标进行了相互测试。最后,特异性生物标志物已成为有希望的预后指标.
    列线图在胃肠道癌症的预后中起重要作用。癌症预后中特定生物标志物的鉴定正在发展。当我们进入精准医学时代时,需要进一步研究可靠的预后指标和生物标志物.
    UNASSIGNED: Accurate cancer prognostication allows for conscious decision-making. There is a need for precise indices, along with predictive biomarkers, which aid cancer prognostication. We sought to conduct an overview of the current state of prognostic indices and biomarkers in the evaluation of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, specifically esophageal, colon and rectal.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a comprehensive review of articles in the PubMed database between September 2001 and February 2022. Only articles written in English were included. We reviewed retrospective analyses and prospective observational studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Nomograms are well-described tools that provide estimates of specific cancer-related events, such as overall survival (OS). They are also useful in unroofing specific patient-related variables, which may be associated with cancer survival. Certain prognostic indices have been tested against each other with the goal of discerning superiority. Finally, specific biomarkers have emerged as promising prognostic indicators.
    UNASSIGNED: Nomograms play a significant role in the prognostication of GI cancer. The identification of specific biomarkers in cancer prognostication is evolving. As we embark on the era of precision medicine, further investigation of reliable prognostic indices and biomarkers is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景和目的:本研究的目的是评估子宫多普勒指数(Ut)的差异,脐带缆(UA),通过对文献进行全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,糖尿病与非糖尿病妊娠的大脑中动脉(MCA)。材料与方法:PubMed,WebofScience,和SCOPUS搜索测量搏动指数(PI)的研究,阻力指数(RI),和脐动脉的收缩/舒张比指数(S/D比),大脑中动脉,糖尿病与非糖尿病妊娠的子宫动脉。两名评审员独立评估了研究的资格,抽象数据,并根据标准化方案进行质量评估。使用标准化平均差(SMD)作为效应大小的量度。使用I2统计量评估异质性。通过漏斗图评估出版偏倚。结果:共有62篇出版物被纳入定性分析,43篇被纳入定量分析。UA-RI,UtA-PI,与非糖尿病孕妇相比,糖尿病孕妇的UtA-S/D比率增加。亚组分析显示,在第三个阶段,UtA-PI水平显着升高,但不是在怀孕的头三个月期间糖尿病与非糖尿病妊娠。UA-PI没有发现差异,UA-S/D比,MCA-PI,MCA-RI,MCA-S/D比,或糖尿病和非糖尿病妊娠之间的UtA-RI。结论:这项荟萃分析显示子宫和脐动脉存在血流动力学变化,但在妊娠合并糖尿病的大脑中动脉中没有。
    Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the differences in Doppler indices of the uterine (Ut), umbilical (UA), and middle cerebral artery (MCA) in diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies by conducting a comprehensive systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched for studies that measured the pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and systolic/diastolic ratio index (S/D ratio) of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and uterine artery in diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies. Two reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of studies, abstracted data, and performed quality assessments according to standardized protocols. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as a measure of effect size. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated by means of funnel plots. Results: A total of 62 publications were included in the qualitative and 43 in quantitative analysis. The UA-RI, UtA-PI, and UtA-S/D ratios were increased in diabetic compared with non-diabetic pregnancies. Subgroup analysis showed that levels of UtA-PI were significantly higher during the third, but not during the first trimester of pregnancy in diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies. No differences were found for the UA-PI, UA-S/D ratio, MCA-PI, MCA-RI, MCA-S/D ratio, or UtA-RI between diabetic and non-diabetic pregnancies. Conclusions: This meta-analysis revealed the presence of hemodynamic changes in uterine and umbilical arteries, but not in the middle cerebral artery in pregnancies complicated by diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:正在比较各种级别的乳腺癌和作为核蛋白Ki-67和嗜银核仁组织区(AgNOR)的增殖指数。
    方法:在这项观察性横断面调查中,在制作组织块之前,收集了来自可疑乳房区域的42例乳房活检,并保存在福尔马林和石蜡中。记录了有关乳腺肿瘤的全面病史和全面的体格检查结果。制作了两个部分,一种用称为Ki-67的免疫组织化学标记染色,另一种用称为AgNOR的独特染色。
    结果:诺丁汉的I级在Ki-671%的受试者中最高,Ki-67为1-10%的科目为II级,Ki-67>10%的受试者为III级。因此,较高的Ki-67评分和较高的诺丁汉等级更密切相关.平均AgNOR评分在诺丁汉III级中最高,在诺丁汉I级中最低。与乳腺癌(CA)的I级和II级相比,其中Ki-67和AgNOR之间没有统计学上的显著关联,CA乳腺的III级显示Ki-67和AgNOR之间有统计学意义的联系.
    结论:增殖已被确定为癌症的一个显著特征,也是疾病预后的一个关键因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Various grades of breast carcinoma and proliferative indices used as nuclear protein Ki-67 and argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions (AgNOR) are being compared to each other.
    METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional investigation, 42 breast biopsies from questionable breast areas were collected and preserved in formalin and paraffin before the tissue blocks were made. A thorough medical history regarding the breast tumor and thorough physical examination results were recorded. Two sections were produced, one stained with an immunohistochemical marker called Ki-67 and the other with a unique stain called AgNOR.
    RESULTS: Grade I in Nottingham was found to be highest in subjects with Ki-67 1%, grade II in subjects with Ki-67 1-10%, and grade III in subjects with Ki-67>10%. Therefore, a higher Ki-67 score and a higher Nottingham grade were more closely associated. The mean AgNOR score was determined to be highest in Nottingham grade III and lowest in Nottingham grade I. In contrast to grade I and grade II of carcinoma (CA) breast, where there was no statistically significant association between Ki-67 and AgNOR, grade III of CA breast showed a statistically significant link between Ki-67 and AgNOR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Proliferation has been identified as a distinctive feature of cancer and as a key factor in the prognosis of the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    义齿牌匾,在义齿表面上形成的生物膜,可能导致许多口腔和全身疾病。因此,义齿菌斑的定量评估对于评估义齿佩戴者的义齿卫生非常重要,特别是预防斑块生物膜相关疾病。这次系统审查的目的是,因此,将使用义齿菌斑指数和文献中发表的平版印刷来回顾和总结视觉义齿卫生评估方法。截至2022年3月,英语语言研究在四个电子数据库中发表,PubMed,Medline,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆,被搜查,随后由两名评估人员手动搜索GoogleScholar。审查尽可能遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目。视觉评估方法的详细信息,包括评估的义齿类型,它的材料和表面,以及使用披露剂,是主要结果。在492项筛查研究中,根据纳入和排除标准纳入74项。其中,60项研究使用了各种义齿菌斑指数,而18项研究使用了平面图像。60项具有指数的研究中的43项和18项具有平面图像的研究中的17项使用了显示剂对斑块进行视觉评估。纳入的研究共描述了21项指标,其中七个对分开的义齿表面进行分级,其余的对整个义齿表面进行分级。在18项平面评估中,一项研究量化了义齿图像上公开的斑块的正方形,16项研究用计算机程序量化了这些像素,一项研究量化了点,像素,和斑块区域的轮廓。总之,由于其简单性,义齿菌斑指数在义齿菌斑评估中似乎很受欢迎。计算机平面评估,虽然更耗时,提供了一个更准确的斑块负荷的评估,因为它是不易主观性和评估者的错误。
    Denture plaque, a biofilm that develops on denture surfaces, could contribute to many oral and systemic afflictions. Hence, a quantitative assessment of denture plaque is important to evaluate the denture hygiene of denture wearers, particularly to prevent plaque biofilm-associated diseases. The aim of this systematic review, therefore, was to review and summarize the visual denture hygiene assessment methods using denture plaque indices and with planimetries published in the literature. English language studies published up to March 2022 in four electronic databases, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched, followed by a manual search of Google Scholar by two assessors. The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) whenever possible. Details of the visual assessment methods, including the types of denture assessed, its materials and its surfaces, as well as the use of a disclosing agent, were the main outcomes. Of 492 screened studies, 74 were included per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 60 studies utilized various denture plaque indices while 18 used planimetries. 43 out of 60 studies with indices and 17 out of 18 studies with planimetries used disclosing agents for visual evaluation of plaque. A total of 21 indices were described in the included studies, of which seven graded a divided denture surface, while the remainder graded entire denture surface. Of the 18 planimetric assessments, one study quantified squares of the disclosed plaques on denture images, 16 studies quantified such pixels with computer programs, and a single study quantified points, pixels, and contour of plaque areas. In summary, denture plaque indices appear to be popular in denture plaque assessment due to their simplicity. Computerized planimetric assessment, though more time-consuming, provides a more accurate assessment of plaque load as it is less prone to subjectivity and assessor errors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:当不良社会条件所传达的不利条件决定了一个人的生命和生计受到健康中特定和可识别事件的威胁的程度时,就会出现社会脆弱性,自然,或社会。估计社会脆弱性的一种常见方法是通过汇总社会因素的指数。此范围审查广泛旨在绘制有关社会脆弱性指数的文献。我们的主要目标是表征社会脆弱性指数,了解社会脆弱性指数的构成,并描述这些指数是如何在文献中使用的。
    方法:在六个电子数据库中进行了范围审查,以确定原始研究,以英文出版,法语,荷兰人,西班牙语或葡萄牙语,并解决了社会脆弱性指数(SVI)的开发或使用。标题,摘要,并对全文进行筛选和资格评估.提取指标数据,并使用简单的描述性统计和计数来产生叙述性摘要。
    结果:总计,纳入292项研究,其中126项研究来自环境,气候变化或灾害规划研究领域,156项研究来自健康或医学领域。每个指数的平均项目数为19(SD10.5),最常见的数据来源来自人口普查。这些指数的组成中有122个不同的项目,分为29个领域。SVIs中包含的前三个域是:处于风险人群(例如,%老年人,子女或家属),教育,和社会经济地位。在47.9%的研究中,SVIs用于预测结果,Covid-19感染率或死亡率是最常见的结果。
    结论:我们提供了截至2021年12月的文献中SVI的概述,为社会脆弱性指数的常用变量提供了新颖的总结。我们还证明了SVIs通常用于几个研究领域,尤其是2010年以来。无论是在灾害规划领域,环境科学或健康科学,SVI由类似的项目和域组成。SVIs可用于预测不同的结果,对未来作为跨学科合作工具的使用具有重要意义。
    Social vulnerability occurs when the disadvantage conveyed by poor social conditions determines the degree to which one\'s life and livelihood are at risk from a particular and identifiable event in health, nature, or society. A common way to estimate social vulnerability is through an index aggregating social factors. This scoping review broadly aimed to map the literature on social vulnerability indices. Our main objectives were to characterize social vulnerability indices, understand the composition of social vulnerability indices, and describe how these indices are utilized in the literature.
    A scoping review was conducted in six electronic databases to identify original research, published in English, French, Dutch, Spanish or Portuguese, and which addressed the development or use of a social vulnerability index (SVI). Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened and assessed for eligibility. Data were extracted on the indices and simple descriptive statistics and counts were used to produce a narrative summary.
    In total, 292 studies were included, of which 126 studies came from environmental, climate change or disaster planning fields of study and 156 studies were from the fields of health or medicine. The mean number of items per index was 19 (SD 10.5) and the most common source of data was from censuses. There were 122 distinct items in the composition of these indices, categorized into 29 domains. The top three domains included in the SVIs were: at risk populations (e.g., % older adults, children or dependents), education, and socioeconomic status. SVIs were used to predict outcomes in 47.9% of studies, and rate of Covid-19 infection or mortality was the most common outcome measured.
    We provide an overview of SVIs in the literature up to December 2021, providing a novel summary of commonly used variables for social vulnerability indices. We also demonstrate that SVIs are commonly used in several fields of research, especially since 2010. Whether in the field of disaster planning, environmental science or health sciences, the SVIs are composed of similar items and domains. SVIs can be used to predict diverse outcomes, with implications for future use as tools in interdisciplinary collaborations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号