Indices

指数
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    准确的癌症预测允许有意识的决策。需要精确的指数,以及预测性生物标志物,有助于癌症预后。我们试图对胃肠道(GI)癌症评估中预后指标和生物标志物的现状进行概述。特别是食道,结肠和直肠。
    我们在2001年9月至2022年2月之间对PubMed数据库中的文章进行了全面审查。只包括用英语写的文章。我们回顾了回顾性分析和前瞻性观察性研究。
    列线图是描述良好的工具,可提供对特定癌症相关事件的估计,如总生存期(OS)。它们还可用于揭示特定的患者相关变量,这可能与癌症生存有关。为了辨别优越性,已经对某些预后指标进行了相互测试。最后,特异性生物标志物已成为有希望的预后指标.
    列线图在胃肠道癌症的预后中起重要作用。癌症预后中特定生物标志物的鉴定正在发展。当我们进入精准医学时代时,需要进一步研究可靠的预后指标和生物标志物.
    UNASSIGNED: Accurate cancer prognostication allows for conscious decision-making. There is a need for precise indices, along with predictive biomarkers, which aid cancer prognostication. We sought to conduct an overview of the current state of prognostic indices and biomarkers in the evaluation of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, specifically esophageal, colon and rectal.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a comprehensive review of articles in the PubMed database between September 2001 and February 2022. Only articles written in English were included. We reviewed retrospective analyses and prospective observational studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Nomograms are well-described tools that provide estimates of specific cancer-related events, such as overall survival (OS). They are also useful in unroofing specific patient-related variables, which may be associated with cancer survival. Certain prognostic indices have been tested against each other with the goal of discerning superiority. Finally, specific biomarkers have emerged as promising prognostic indicators.
    UNASSIGNED: Nomograms play a significant role in the prognostication of GI cancer. The identification of specific biomarkers in cancer prognostication is evolving. As we embark on the era of precision medicine, further investigation of reliable prognostic indices and biomarkers is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景和目的:本研究的目的是评估子宫多普勒指数(Ut)的差异,脐带缆(UA),通过对文献进行全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,糖尿病与非糖尿病妊娠的大脑中动脉(MCA)。材料与方法:PubMed,WebofScience,和SCOPUS搜索测量搏动指数(PI)的研究,阻力指数(RI),和脐动脉的收缩/舒张比指数(S/D比),大脑中动脉,糖尿病与非糖尿病妊娠的子宫动脉。两名评审员独立评估了研究的资格,抽象数据,并根据标准化方案进行质量评估。使用标准化平均差(SMD)作为效应大小的量度。使用I2统计量评估异质性。通过漏斗图评估出版偏倚。结果:共有62篇出版物被纳入定性分析,43篇被纳入定量分析。UA-RI,UtA-PI,与非糖尿病孕妇相比,糖尿病孕妇的UtA-S/D比率增加。亚组分析显示,在第三个阶段,UtA-PI水平显着升高,但不是在怀孕的头三个月期间糖尿病与非糖尿病妊娠。UA-PI没有发现差异,UA-S/D比,MCA-PI,MCA-RI,MCA-S/D比,或糖尿病和非糖尿病妊娠之间的UtA-RI。结论:这项荟萃分析显示子宫和脐动脉存在血流动力学变化,但在妊娠合并糖尿病的大脑中动脉中没有。
    Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the differences in Doppler indices of the uterine (Ut), umbilical (UA), and middle cerebral artery (MCA) in diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies by conducting a comprehensive systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched for studies that measured the pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and systolic/diastolic ratio index (S/D ratio) of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and uterine artery in diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies. Two reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of studies, abstracted data, and performed quality assessments according to standardized protocols. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as a measure of effect size. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated by means of funnel plots. Results: A total of 62 publications were included in the qualitative and 43 in quantitative analysis. The UA-RI, UtA-PI, and UtA-S/D ratios were increased in diabetic compared with non-diabetic pregnancies. Subgroup analysis showed that levels of UtA-PI were significantly higher during the third, but not during the first trimester of pregnancy in diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies. No differences were found for the UA-PI, UA-S/D ratio, MCA-PI, MCA-RI, MCA-S/D ratio, or UtA-RI between diabetic and non-diabetic pregnancies. Conclusions: This meta-analysis revealed the presence of hemodynamic changes in uterine and umbilical arteries, but not in the middle cerebral artery in pregnancies complicated by diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    义齿牌匾,在义齿表面上形成的生物膜,可能导致许多口腔和全身疾病。因此,义齿菌斑的定量评估对于评估义齿佩戴者的义齿卫生非常重要,特别是预防斑块生物膜相关疾病。这次系统审查的目的是,因此,将使用义齿菌斑指数和文献中发表的平版印刷来回顾和总结视觉义齿卫生评估方法。截至2022年3月,英语语言研究在四个电子数据库中发表,PubMed,Medline,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆,被搜查,随后由两名评估人员手动搜索GoogleScholar。审查尽可能遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目。视觉评估方法的详细信息,包括评估的义齿类型,它的材料和表面,以及使用披露剂,是主要结果。在492项筛查研究中,根据纳入和排除标准纳入74项。其中,60项研究使用了各种义齿菌斑指数,而18项研究使用了平面图像。60项具有指数的研究中的43项和18项具有平面图像的研究中的17项使用了显示剂对斑块进行视觉评估。纳入的研究共描述了21项指标,其中七个对分开的义齿表面进行分级,其余的对整个义齿表面进行分级。在18项平面评估中,一项研究量化了义齿图像上公开的斑块的正方形,16项研究用计算机程序量化了这些像素,一项研究量化了点,像素,和斑块区域的轮廓。总之,由于其简单性,义齿菌斑指数在义齿菌斑评估中似乎很受欢迎。计算机平面评估,虽然更耗时,提供了一个更准确的斑块负荷的评估,因为它是不易主观性和评估者的错误。
    Denture plaque, a biofilm that develops on denture surfaces, could contribute to many oral and systemic afflictions. Hence, a quantitative assessment of denture plaque is important to evaluate the denture hygiene of denture wearers, particularly to prevent plaque biofilm-associated diseases. The aim of this systematic review, therefore, was to review and summarize the visual denture hygiene assessment methods using denture plaque indices and with planimetries published in the literature. English language studies published up to March 2022 in four electronic databases, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched, followed by a manual search of Google Scholar by two assessors. The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) whenever possible. Details of the visual assessment methods, including the types of denture assessed, its materials and its surfaces, as well as the use of a disclosing agent, were the main outcomes. Of 492 screened studies, 74 were included per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 60 studies utilized various denture plaque indices while 18 used planimetries. 43 out of 60 studies with indices and 17 out of 18 studies with planimetries used disclosing agents for visual evaluation of plaque. A total of 21 indices were described in the included studies, of which seven graded a divided denture surface, while the remainder graded entire denture surface. Of the 18 planimetric assessments, one study quantified squares of the disclosed plaques on denture images, 16 studies quantified such pixels with computer programs, and a single study quantified points, pixels, and contour of plaque areas. In summary, denture plaque indices appear to be popular in denture plaque assessment due to their simplicity. Computerized planimetric assessment, though more time-consuming, provides a more accurate assessment of plaque load as it is less prone to subjectivity and assessor errors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:当不良社会条件所传达的不利条件决定了一个人的生命和生计受到健康中特定和可识别事件的威胁的程度时,就会出现社会脆弱性,自然,或社会。估计社会脆弱性的一种常见方法是通过汇总社会因素的指数。此范围审查广泛旨在绘制有关社会脆弱性指数的文献。我们的主要目标是表征社会脆弱性指数,了解社会脆弱性指数的构成,并描述这些指数是如何在文献中使用的。
    方法:在六个电子数据库中进行了范围审查,以确定原始研究,以英文出版,法语,荷兰人,西班牙语或葡萄牙语,并解决了社会脆弱性指数(SVI)的开发或使用。标题,摘要,并对全文进行筛选和资格评估.提取指标数据,并使用简单的描述性统计和计数来产生叙述性摘要。
    结果:总计,纳入292项研究,其中126项研究来自环境,气候变化或灾害规划研究领域,156项研究来自健康或医学领域。每个指数的平均项目数为19(SD10.5),最常见的数据来源来自人口普查。这些指数的组成中有122个不同的项目,分为29个领域。SVIs中包含的前三个域是:处于风险人群(例如,%老年人,子女或家属),教育,和社会经济地位。在47.9%的研究中,SVIs用于预测结果,Covid-19感染率或死亡率是最常见的结果。
    结论:我们提供了截至2021年12月的文献中SVI的概述,为社会脆弱性指数的常用变量提供了新颖的总结。我们还证明了SVIs通常用于几个研究领域,尤其是2010年以来。无论是在灾害规划领域,环境科学或健康科学,SVI由类似的项目和域组成。SVIs可用于预测不同的结果,对未来作为跨学科合作工具的使用具有重要意义。
    Social vulnerability occurs when the disadvantage conveyed by poor social conditions determines the degree to which one\'s life and livelihood are at risk from a particular and identifiable event in health, nature, or society. A common way to estimate social vulnerability is through an index aggregating social factors. This scoping review broadly aimed to map the literature on social vulnerability indices. Our main objectives were to characterize social vulnerability indices, understand the composition of social vulnerability indices, and describe how these indices are utilized in the literature.
    A scoping review was conducted in six electronic databases to identify original research, published in English, French, Dutch, Spanish or Portuguese, and which addressed the development or use of a social vulnerability index (SVI). Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened and assessed for eligibility. Data were extracted on the indices and simple descriptive statistics and counts were used to produce a narrative summary.
    In total, 292 studies were included, of which 126 studies came from environmental, climate change or disaster planning fields of study and 156 studies were from the fields of health or medicine. The mean number of items per index was 19 (SD 10.5) and the most common source of data was from censuses. There were 122 distinct items in the composition of these indices, categorized into 29 domains. The top three domains included in the SVIs were: at risk populations (e.g., % older adults, children or dependents), education, and socioeconomic status. SVIs were used to predict outcomes in 47.9% of studies, and rate of Covid-19 infection or mortality was the most common outcome measured.
    We provide an overview of SVIs in the literature up to December 2021, providing a novel summary of commonly used variables for social vulnerability indices. We also demonstrate that SVIs are commonly used in several fields of research, especially since 2010. Whether in the field of disaster planning, environmental science or health sciences, the SVIs are composed of similar items and domains. SVIs can be used to predict diverse outcomes, with implications for future use as tools in interdisciplinary collaborations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    粮食贫困是一种现象,目前在全球南方和全球北方都受到越来越多的社会关注。它通常等同于粮食不安全,存在许多评估工具和报告。然而,关于粮食贫困的具体数据有限。从粮食贫困的理论概念出发,本文在范围界定审查中,通过粮食不安全指数和指标以及一般贫困评估,研究了粮食贫困的哪些方面。审查特别侧重于粮食贫困的社会层面,并指出,粮食贫困报告不足,迄今为止还没有适当的评估工具。对粮食不安全和一般贫困评估的现有指数和指标进行了严格审查,并为政策和实践评估社会粮食贫困提出了建议。
    Food poverty is a phenomenon that is currently receiving increasing social attention in both the Global South and the Global North. It is often equated with food insecurity, for which numerous assessment tools and reports exist. However, only limited specific data can be found on food poverty. Starting from a theoretical concept of food poverty, this article examines in a scoping review which dimensions of food poverty are captured by indices and indicators of food insecurity and general poverty assessments. The review focuses particularly on the social dimension of food poverty and points out that it is under-reported and that no adequate assessment tools exist so far. Existing indices and indicators of food insecurity and general poverty assessments are critically reviewed and suggestions for the assessment of social food poverty for policy and practice derived.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The present critical review was conducted to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), an assessment tool designed specifically to predict long-term mortality, with regard to its reliability, concurrent validity, sensitivity, incremental and predictive validity. The original version of the CCI has been adapted for use with different sources of data, ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. The inter-rater reliability of the CCI was found to be excellent, with extremely high agreement between self-report and medical charts. The CCI has also been shown either to have concurrent validity with a number of other prognostic scales or to result in concordant predictions. Importantly, the clinimetric sensitivity of the CCI has been demonstrated in a variety of medical conditions, with stepwise increases in the CCI associated with stepwise increases in mortality. The CCI is also characterized by the clinimetric property of incremental validity, whereby adding the CCI to other measures increases the overall predictive accuracy. It has been shown to predict long-term mortality in different clinical populations, including medical, surgical, intensive care unit (ICU), trauma, and cancer patients. It may also predict in-hospital mortality, although in some instances, such as ICU or trauma patients, the CCI did not perform as well as other instruments designed specifically for that purpose. The CCI thus appears to be clinically useful not only to provide a valid assessment of the patient\'s unique clinical situation, but also to demarcate major diagnostic and prognostic differences among subgroups of patients sharing the same medical diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The pandemic of overweight and obesity has become a major clinical and public health concern worldwide. Anthropometric indices are indirect and quantitative tools used to identify individuals at increased risk of body fat-related morbidity. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the concordances and correlations between anthropometric indices of obesity in adults and whether these indices can be used interchangeably.
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: A literature search was conducted in three databases of peer-reviewed publications (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase). Further, the first 10 pages of Google Scholar were also searched for relevant studies.
    RESULTS: There were strong correlations between body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) and between BMI and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and a weak correlation between BMI and neck circumference (NC). There was a very strong correlation between WC and WHtR and a moderate correlation between WC and NC. There were moderate concordances between BMI and WC and between BMI and WHtR and good concordance between WC and WHtR.
    CONCLUSIONS: BMI, WC, and WHtR indices can be moderately used interchangeably with caution. More studies in adult populations using statistical tests of concordance and adjusting for differences in ethnicity, age, gender, and weight quantiles are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:Liveability是一个多维和分层的概念,由各种标准和子标准组成,可以以不同的方式进行评估。这项研究的目的是系统地回顾文献中用于评估城市宜居性的指标和方法。
    背景:使用Arksey和O\'Malley的五阶段方法框架进行了这项范围审查。对电子数据库的系统搜索,包括Scopus,Medline(通过PubMed),Embase,WebofScience和EBSCO的工作一直持续到2019年5月29日。Web搜索,还进行了搜索参考列表和手工搜索,以检索更多相关文章。两名审稿人根据入选标准筛选了论文的资格,并提取了他们的关键数据并描述性报告。
    结论:3599篇论文中有67篇(67篇)符合选择标准。这篇综述显示了五个不同的领域,被认为是宜居性的重要组成部分。这些是经济的,Environmental,机构,社会,治理(政治)领域。在各种研究中经常应用的最重要的子域(指标)是环境友好性和可持续性,社会文化条件与经济活力和竞争力。我们还确定了用于评估城市宜居性的七种不同方法和六种排名工具。在定量方法中,三种方法占文章的89.6%。这些方法是层次分析法和熵(AHP;n=24;50%),因子分析和主成分分析(FA&PCA;n=12;25%)和空间多准则决策方法(空间;n=7;14.6%)。在使用的排名工具中,三个排名工具占文章的65.4%。这些工具是宜居城市科学评估标准(LCSES;n=9;34.6%),全球宜居城市指数(GLCI;n=4;15.4%)和经济学人智库(EIU;n=4;15.4%)。
    结论:本文讨论并总结了用于确定城市宜居性的最新指标和方法。审查中提供的信息可以帮助未来的调查人员更好地决定哪种方法适合他们的目的和情况,并比以前更系统地测量城市宜居性。
    OBJECTIVE: Liveability is a multi-dimensional and hierarchical concept which consists of various criteria and sub-criteria and may be evaluated in different ways. The aim of this study was to systematically review indicators and methods used for the evaluation of urban liveability in literature.
    BACKGROUND: The five-stage methodological framework of Arksey and O\'Malley was used to conduct this scoping review. A systematic search of electronic databases, including Scopus, Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and EBSCO was done until May 29, 2019. Web searching, searching reference lists and hand searching was also conducted to retrieve more relevant articles. Two reviewers screened the papers for eligibility based on the inclusion criteria and extracted their key data and reported them descriptively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Sixty seven (67) out of 3,599 papers met the selection criteria. This review showed five distinct domains considered to be important components of liveability. These were Economical, Environmental, Institutional, Social, and Governance (Political) domains. The most important subdomains (indices) which were frequently applied in various studies were Environmental friendliness and Sustainability, Socio-Cultural Conditions and Economic Vibrancy and Competitiveness. We also identified seven different methodologies and six ranking tools used for assessing urban liveability. Among the quantitative methods, three methods accounted for 89.6% of the articles. These methods were the Analytical hierarchy process and entropy (AHP; n=24; 50%), Factor analysis & Principle Component Analysis (FA & PCA; n=12; 25%) and Spatial Multi-criteria Decision-making Method (Spatial; n=7; 14.6%). Among the ranking tools used, three ranking tools accounted for 65.4% of the articles. These tools were the Livable City Scientific Evaluation Standards (LCSES; n=9; 34.6%), The Global Liveable Cities Index (GLCI; n=4; 15.4%) and the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU; n=4; 15.4%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This paper discusses and summarizes the latest indicators and methods used for determining urban liveability. The information offered in the review can help future investigators to decide which method suits their purpose and situation better and measure urban liveability more systematically than before.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    地球的生态系统面临着与人口增长相关的不可持续的社会经济发展带来的严重环境压力,城市化,和工业化。世界各国政府对解决这些问题的可持续性措施感兴趣。遥感允许测量,一体化,并提供有用的信息,以便在不同的时间和空间尺度上进行有效的决策。科学家和决策者赞同广泛使用遥感来弥合学科之间的差距并实现可持续发展。本文对用于支持可持续发展努力的遥感技术进行了广泛的回顾,重点是自然资源管理和自然灾害评估。我们进一步探讨了遥感如何用于交叉领域,以跨学科的方式支持旨在应对可持续发展挑战的决策。遥感技术在传感器分辨率方面有了显著提高,数据采集时间,以及过去几年的可访问性。这项技术也被广泛应用于解决可持续发展中的关键问题和挑战。此外,对文献中提出的用于评估可持续发展目标的各种卫星衍生指数的适用性和局限性的评估表明,这些较旧的指数仍然表现良好。然而,随着传感器辐射测量和分辨率的进步,它们被较少利用,新指数被较少探索。
    The Earth\'s ecosystems face severe environmental stress from unsustainable socioeconomic development linked to population growth, urbanization, and industrialization. Governments worldwide are interested in sustainability measures to address these issues. Remote sensing allows for the measurement, integration, and presentation of useful information for effective decision-making at various temporal and spatial scales. Scientists and decision-makers have endorsed extensive use of remote sensing to bridge gaps among disciplines and achieve sustainable development. This paper presents an extensive review of remote sensing technology used to support sustainable development efforts, with a focus on natural resource management and assessment of natural hazards. We further explore how remote sensing can be used in a cross-cutting, interdisciplinary manner to support decision-making aimed at addressing sustainable development challenges. Remote sensing technology has improved significantly in terms of sensor resolution, data acquisition time, and accessibility over the past several years. This technology has also been widely applied to address key issues and challenges in sustainability. Furthermore, an evaluation of the suitability and limitations of various satellite-derived indices proposed in the literature for assessing sustainable development goals showed that these older indices still perform reasonably well. Nevertheless, with advancements in sensor radiometry and resolution, they were less exploited and new indices are less explored.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Indicators of ecosystem health are effective tools to assess freshwater ecosystem impairment. However, they are scarcely used as a monitoring tool by local environmental agencies in Argentina. Here, we review the literature to analyze the use of ecosystem health indicators in freshwaters from Argentina. We found 91 scientific articles relating to the use of ecological indices to assess the impact of different environmental stressors in aquatic environments published between 1996 and 2019. We generated Google Earth map where we deployed the sampling sites and type of indices reported by each article. As biological indices were the most used, we also surveyed bioindication experts to gather information on their application. We found that most studies were concentrated mainly in Pampas (34%), Dry Chaco (20%), Espinal (12%), and Patagonian Steppe (10%) ecoregions. Biological indices (mainly with invertebrates) were more used than geomorphological or physico-chemical indices. Indices resulted useful to evaluate the impact of stressors in 63% of cases, being land use the most studied stressor. However, sampling design varied greatly among studies, making their comparison difficult. The information compiled here could help to the design of monitoring protocols, the adoption of regional indices, and the creation of a national inventory of ecosystem health status, which are mandatory to propose well-grounded conservation and management policies for freshwaters in Argentina.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号